MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: MONTES, DAISYREE LORRAINE J. Name of Rater: VENUS SHEILA O. AYADO
Position: TEACHER III Position: HT IV
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: BUTUAN CITY Date of Review: February 8, 2023
Rating Period: SY 2022-2023

Mid-year
Review

Timeline
Mid-year Review Rating
Weight Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Means of Verification
per KRA
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education Knowledg knowledge of (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services e and content inter-observer agreement
Pedagogy within and form about knowledge of
across content within and across 5 4 0.9 4 0.9 0.9
curriculum curriculum teaching areas
teaching 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
areas. developed highlighting
integration of content
knowledge within and across
subject areas
Efficiency
3. Instructional materials
highlighting mastery of
content and its integration in
other subject areas
5 4 0.9 4 0.9 0.9
4. Performance tasks/test
material(s) highlighting
integration of content
knowledge within and across
subject areas
5. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)

Timeliness
 Mid-year
Review

Timeline
Mid-year Review Rating
Weight Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Means of Verification
per KRA
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 2. Used a 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education range of (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services teaching inter-observer agreement
strategies form about teaching
that enhance strategies that enhance 4 0.9 4 0.9 0.9
learner learner achievement in
achievement literacy and numeracy skills
in literacy 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
and used in teaching highlighting
numeracy learner-centered strategies
skills. that promote literacy and/or
numeracy skills
3. Instructional materials
highlighting learner-centered Efficiency
strategies that promote
literacy and/or numeracy
skills
4. Performance tasks/test 5 4 0.9 4 0.9 0.9
material(s) used in teaching
5. Results of assessment used
in teaching
6. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations) Timeliness
Basic 3. Applied a 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education range of (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services teaching inter-observer agreement
strategies to form about teaching
develop strategies to develop critical 5 4 0.9 4 0.9 0.9
critical and and creative thinking, as
creative well as other higher-order
thinking, as thinking skills
well as other 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
higher-order used in teaching highlighting
thinking different teaching strategies
skills. that develop critical and
creative thinking and/or
other HOTS
 Mid-year
Review

Timeline
Mid-year Review Rating
Weight Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Means of Verification
per KRA
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
3. Instructional materials Efficiency
highlighting different
teaching strategies that
develop critical and creative
thinking and/or other HOTS 5 4 0.9 4 0.9 0.9
4. Performance tasks/test
material(s) used in
demonstration teaching
5. Results of assessment used
in teaching
6. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations) Timeliness
Basic 2. 4. Managed 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education Learning classroom (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services Environme structure to inter-observer agreement
nt and engage form about managing
Diversity learners, classroom structure that 5 4 0.9 4 0.9 0.9
of individually engages learners in various
Learners or in groups, activities
in meaningful 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs Efficiency
exploration, highlighting various
discovery classroom management
and hands- strategies that engage
on activities learners in activities/tasks in 5 4 0.9 4 0.9 0.9
within a different physical learning
range of environments
physical 3. Others (Please specify and
learning provide annotations) Timeliness
environment
s.
Basic 5. Managed Classroom observation tool Quality
Education learner (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-
Services behavior observer agreement form about
constructivel teacher management of learner
y by applying behavior using the following 0.9
0.9 0.9
positive and strategies: 4 4
non-violent 1. Providing motivation
discipline to 2. Praising the learners/Giving
ensure positive feedback
learning- 3. Setting house
 Mid-year
Review

Timeline
Mid-year Review Rating
Weight Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Means of Verification
per KRA
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
focused rules/guidelines Efficiency
environment 4. Ensuring learners’ active
s. participation
5. Allowing learners to express
their ideas/opinions 5 4 0.9 4 0.9 0.9
6. Giving equal opportunities
to learners
7. Encouraging learners to ask
questions
8. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)

Timeliness
Basic 6. Used 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education differentiated (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services , inter-observer agreement
development form about using
ally differentiated, 5 4 0.9 4 0.9 0.9
appropriate developmentally appropriate
learning learning experiences
experiences 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
to address developed highlighting
learners’ differentiation in content,
gender, product, process, learning Efficiency
needs, environment or others
strengths, according to learners’
interests and gender, needs, strengths,
experiences. interests and experiences 5 4 0.9 4 0.9 0.9
3. Instructional materials
developed highlighting
differentiation in content,
product, process, learning
environment or others
according to learners’
gender, needs, strengths,
interests and experiences
4. Others (Please specify and Timeliness
provide annotations)
 Mid-year
Review

Timeline
Mid-year Review Rating
Weight Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Means of Verification
per KRA
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 3. 7. Planned, 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education Curriculu managed (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services m and and inter-observer agreement
Planning implemented form about using
development developmentally sequenced 5 4 0.9 4 0.9 0.9
ally teaching and learning
sequenced process
teaching and 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
learning highlighting
processes to developmentally sequenced
meet instruction that meet
curriculum curriculum goals and varied Efficiency
requirements teaching contexts
and varied 3. Instructional materials used
teaching to implement
contexts. developmentally sequenced 5 4 0.9 4 0.9 0.9
teaching and learning
process to meet curriculum
requirements and varied
teaching contexts
4. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)

Timeliness
8. 1. Personal notes of teachers Quality
Participated on LACs/FGDs/meetings
in collegial with proof of attendance
discussions 2. Minutes of LAC/FGD
that use sessions on use of teacher 5 4 0.9 4 0.9 0.9
teacher and and learner feedback to
learner enrich teaching practice with Efficiency
feedback to proof of attendance
enrich 3. Others (Please specify and
teaching provide annotations)
practice. 5 4 0.9 4 0.9 0.9

Timeliness
 Mid-year
Review

Timeline
Mid-year Review Rating
Weight Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Means of Verification
per KRA
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 9. Selected, 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education developed, (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services organized inter-observer agreement
and used form about using appropriate
appropriate teaching and learning 5 4 0.9 4 0.9 0.9
teaching and resources, including ICT
learning Examples:
resources,  Activity sheets/task
including sheets/work sheets Efficiency
ICT, to  PowerPoint presentations
address  Video clips
learning  Module
goals.  SIMs-Strategic 5 4 0.9 4 0.9 0.9
Intervention Materials
 Others
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
with appropriate instructional
materials appended
3. Others (Please specify and Timeliness
provide annotations)
 Mid-year
Review

Timeline
Mid-year Review Rating
Weight Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Means of Verification
per KRA
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 4. 10. 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education Assessme Designed, (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services nt and selected, inter-observer agreement
Reporting organized form about using diagnostic,
and used formative and summative 5 4 0.9 4 0.9 0.9
diagnostic, assessment strategies
formative 2. Prepared lesson
and plans/modified DLLs
summative highlighting appropriate use
assessment of formative assessment
strategies strategies
consistent 3. Developed diagnostic tests:
with (a) with TOS reviewed by
curriculum superior; (b) with sample
requirements accomplished
. questionnaire/answer
sheets
4. Developed summative tests:
(a) with TOS reviewed by
superior; (b) with sample
accomplished
questionnaire/answer
sheets
Efficiency
5. Developed performance
tasks: (a) with rubrics
reviewed by superior; (b)
with sample accomplished
5 4 0.9 4 0.9 0.9
rubrics
6. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)

Timeliness
 Mid-year
Review

Timeline
Mid-year Review Rating
Weight Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Means of Verification
per KRA
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 11. 1. Compilation of a learner’s Quality
Education Monitored written work with summary
Services and of results and with signature
evaluated of parents
learner 2. Formative/summative 5 4 0.9 4 0.9 0.9
progress and assessment tools with TOS
achievement and frequency of errors with Efficiency
using learner identified least mastered
attainment skills
data. 3. Class records/grading
sheets 5 4 0.9 4 0.9 0.9
4. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
showing index of mastery Timeliness
5. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)

5 4 0.9 4 0.9 0.9

Basic 12. 1. At least 3 samples of Quality
Education Communicat corrected test papers of the
Services ed promptly same 3 learners in the same
and clearly learning area with parents’ or
the learners’ guardians’ signature and 5 4 0.9 4 0.9 0.9
needs, date of receipt
progress and
2. Minutes of PTA meetings or
achievement
Parent-Teacher conferences
to key Efficiency
stakeholders, in all quarters with proof of
including parent’s/guardian’s
parents/guar attendance
dians. 3. Report cards with parent’s or 5 4 0.9 4 0.9 0.9
guardian’s signature in all
quarters supported by
minutes of meeting
4. Communication with
parents/guardians using
various modalities Timeliness
5. Anecdotal record showing
entries per quarter
6. Other documents showing
learner needs, progress and 5 4 0.9 4 0.9 0.9
achievement submitted to
 Mid-year
Review

Timeline
Mid-year Review Rating
Weight Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Means of Verification
per KRA
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
other stakeholders

Basic 5. Plus 13. 10% 1. Certificate of Recognition or Quality

Education Factor Performed Participation
Services various 2. Certificate of Training
related 3. Certificate of Speakership
works/activiti 4. Committee involvement 5 4 0.4 4 0.4 0.4
es that 5. Advisorship of Co-curricular
contribute to activities
the teaching- 6. Book or Journal Efficiency
learning Authorship/Co-authorship/C
process. ontributorship
7. Coordinatorship/
Chairpersonship 5 4 0.4 4 0.4 0.4
8. Coaching and mentoring
learners in competitions
9. Mentoring pre-service/in-
service teachers
10. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
Timeliness

VENUS SHEILA O. AYADO, HT IV DAISYREE LORRAINE J. MONTES, PhD, T III DENNIS R. ROA, DPA

Rater Ratee Approving Authority