FM Assignment
FM Assignment
FM Assignment
Question 1
1.1
Evaluate the importance of the supplementary budget as presented by the
Minister of Finance on the 24 of June 2020.
1.2
Question 2
Question 3
Question 4
1.1
Introduction
The Minister also noted the economic impact of the pandemic, with South
Africa's economy projected to contract by 7.2% in 2020. As a result, the
supplementary budget included various measures to support the economy
and mitigate the impact of the pandemic, such as increased healthcare
spending, additional social grants, and tax relief for individuals and
businesses (Mboweni, 2020).
Conclusion
1.2
Introduction
The budget allocation prioritized funding for healthcare, social protection, and
economic support. The healthcare sector received R21.5 billion for medical
supplies, equipment, and health services, while R50 billion was allocated for
social grants to support vulnerable households. The budget also allocated
R100 billion for job creation, support to small and medium-sized enterprises
(SMEs), and relief for firms affected by the pandemic. Other priorities included
funding for education, infrastructure, and public employment programs.
The government secured funding for the relief package by drawing down
surplus funds from institutions such as the Unemployment Insurance Fund
(UIF) and reallocating resources from existing programs. However, some
critics have argued that the budget could have been more ambitious in terms
of its funding priorities and the scale of the relief package. For example, some
have argued that the budget should have allocated more funds for healthcare
and education, while others have called for more support for informal workers
and low-income households.
Conclusion
Introduction
To finance the increased spending, the government drew down on its cash
balances, including the use of R95 billion from the Unemployment Insurance
Fund (UIF), and borrowed extensively from both domestic and international
markets. The budget also included measures to reduce spending, including a
reduction in the public sector wage bill, a freeze on non-critical vacancies, and
a reduction in the goods and services budget.
The revised fiscal framework has been subject to some criticism, with
concerns raised about the sustainability of the increased deficit and debt
levels, as well as the potential impact on inflation and interest rates. Some
critics have also questioned the prioritization of spending, arguing that more
support should have been provided for small businesses and vulnerable
households.
Conclusion
Introduction
ZBB has several advantages that could improve public finances. Firstly, ZBB
ensures that all expenses are justified, and funds are allocated according to
priorities. This helps in identifying low-priority items and eliminating them, thus
reducing the government's overall expenditure (Drury, 2015). Secondly, ZBB
promotes transparency in budgeting since it requires justifying all expenses,
which can help in reducing corruption and misappropriation of funds
(Mashenene & Ngobeni, 2021). Thirdly, ZBB encourages participation and
involvement of stakeholders, such as citizens, in the budgeting process. This
helps in aligning the budget with the needs of the public, thus improving public
finances (Bogdan, 2016).
However, ZBB has some limitations that could hinder its effectiveness as a
strategic budget reform. Firstly, the process of justifying all expenses can be
time-consuming and resource-intensive, especially for large and complex
organizations like the government (Drury, 2015). Secondly, ZBB may be
challenging to implement since it requires a cultural shift in the organization's
mindset, which can be resistant to change (Mashenene & Ngobeni, 2021).
Thirdly, ZBB may not be suitable for all types of organizations, as some may
have fixed costs that cannot be reduced, making it challenging to implement
ZBB (Bogdan, 2016).
Conclusion
In conclusion, ZBB is a strategic budget reform that could improve public
finances by ensuring that funds are allocated according to priorities,
promoting transparency, and encouraging stakeholder participation. However,
the process of justifying all expenses can be time-consuming, and ZBB may
not be suitable for all types of organizations. Therefore, it is essential to
consider the advantages and limitations of ZBB when deciding whether to
adopt it as a strategic budget reform.
Question 4
Introduction
Impact on the fiscal framework: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a severe
impact on South Africa's fiscal framework. According to the 2020
Supplementary Budgetary Review, the sharp reductions in collections for
South Africa's two largest revenue items, domestic VAT and pay-as-you-earn,
were evident in April and May of 2020 (National Treasury, 2020). This
reduction in revenue can be attributed to the economic downturn caused by
the pandemic, which led to reduced economic activity and job losses.
The widening budget deficit has also increased the country's debt levels. The
National Treasury projected that the country's gross debt-to-GDP ratio would
increase from 63.3% in 2019/2020 to 82.6% in 2020/2021 (National Treasury,
2020). The increase in debt levels has raised concerns about the
sustainability of the country's fiscal framework in the long term.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on South
Africa's fiscal framework. The reduction in revenue due to the pandemic's
economic downturn, coupled with increased government spending, has
widened the country's budget deficit and increased its debt levels. In the long
term, this may pose a challenge to the sustainability of the country's fiscal
framework.
References