FM Assignment

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 10

Table of Contents

Question 1

1.1
Evaluate the importance of the supplementary budget as presented by the
Minister of Finance on the 24 of June 2020.

1.2

Critically discuss the spending priorities of the 2020 Supplementary Budget.

Question 2

Evaluate the revised fiscal framework for 2020/21.

Question 3

Critically discuss the zero based budgeting approach as a strategic budget


reform that could improve public finances.

Question 4

Evaluate the impact of the Covid-19 on the fiscal framework.


Question 1

1.1

Introduction

The supplementary budget presented by Minister of Finance, Tito Mboweni on


24 June 2020, was of utmost importance for South Africa in the midst of the
COVID-19 pandemic. The Minister acknowledged the fast-evolving nature of
the pandemic and the need for the country to adapt quickly to protect its
citizens. He highlighted the measures that South Africans have taken, such as
wearing masks, washing hands frequently, and maintaining social distancing,
as crucial in saving lives and flattening the curve of the virus (Mboweni, 2020).

The Minister also noted the economic impact of the pandemic, with South
Africa's economy projected to contract by 7.2% in 2020. As a result, the
supplementary budget included various measures to support the economy
and mitigate the impact of the pandemic, such as increased healthcare
spending, additional social grants, and tax relief for individuals and
businesses (Mboweni, 2020).

Furthermore, the supplementary budget also included measures to address


the country's long-term structural challenges, such as the high debt-to-GDP
ratio and weak economic growth. These measures included reducing
government spending, implementing structural reforms, and improving the
efficiency of state-owned enterprises (Mboweni, 2020).

Conclusion

Overall, the importance of the supplementary budget presented by the


Minister of Finance lies in its ability to provide support for the country during a
time of crisis and uncertainty, while also addressing long-term structural
challenges. It reflects the government's commitment to protecting the health
and well-being of its citizens and supporting the economy during this
challenging time.

1.2

Introduction

The 2020 Supplementary Budget Review outlined the government's response


to the COVID-19 pandemic through a relief package worth R500 billion, aimed
at mitigating the impact of the pandemic on the economy and households.
The budget aimed to provide temporary support to those most affected by the
restrictions on economic activity, and to ensure efficient and effective use of
the funds, without waste.

The budget allocation prioritized funding for healthcare, social protection, and
economic support. The healthcare sector received R21.5 billion for medical
supplies, equipment, and health services, while R50 billion was allocated for
social grants to support vulnerable households. The budget also allocated
R100 billion for job creation, support to small and medium-sized enterprises
(SMEs), and relief for firms affected by the pandemic. Other priorities included
funding for education, infrastructure, and public employment programs.

The government secured funding for the relief package by drawing down
surplus funds from institutions such as the Unemployment Insurance Fund
(UIF) and reallocating resources from existing programs. However, some
critics have argued that the budget could have been more ambitious in terms
of its funding priorities and the scale of the relief package. For example, some
have argued that the budget should have allocated more funds for healthcare
and education, while others have called for more support for informal workers
and low-income households.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the 2020 Supplementary Budget Review outlined a


comprehensive relief package aimed at mitigating the impact of the COVID-19
pandemic on the economy and households. The budget allocation prioritized
funding for healthcare, social protection, and economic support, and the
government secured funding by drawing down surplus funds and reallocating
resources from existing programs. However, the budget could have been
more ambitious in terms of its funding priorities and the scale of the relief
package.
Question 2

Introduction

The revised fiscal framework for 2020/21, announced in response to the


COVID-19 pandemic, aimed to provide support for the economy and
households while ensuring fiscal sustainability. Table 2.3 in the Main Budget
framework document shows the adjustments made to the 2020/21 Budget.

The revised fiscal framework included a substantial increase in government


spending, with total spending increasing from R1.8 trillion to R2.2 trillion. The
budget also included a significant increase in the budget deficit, which rose
from 6.8% to 14.6% of GDP, and a sharp increase in government borrowing.

To finance the increased spending, the government drew down on its cash
balances, including the use of R95 billion from the Unemployment Insurance
Fund (UIF), and borrowed extensively from both domestic and international
markets. The budget also included measures to reduce spending, including a
reduction in the public sector wage bill, a freeze on non-critical vacancies, and
a reduction in the goods and services budget.

The revised fiscal framework has been subject to some criticism, with
concerns raised about the sustainability of the increased deficit and debt
levels, as well as the potential impact on inflation and interest rates. Some
critics have also questioned the prioritization of spending, arguing that more
support should have been provided for small businesses and vulnerable
households.

Conclusion

Overall, the revised fiscal framework for 2020/21 represented a significant


response to the COVID-19 pandemic, with a substantial increase in
government spending aimed at mitigating the impact of the pandemic on the
economy and households. However, the sustainability of the increased deficit
and debt levels remains a concern, and the budget may require further
adjustments in the future.
Question 3

Introduction

Zero-based budgeting (ZBB) is a budgeting approach that requires justifying


all expenses from scratch every budget cycle, unlike incremental budgeting,
which starts from the previous year's budget. ZBB has been adopted as a
strategic budget reform in several countries to enhance public finances. This
essay will critically discuss ZBB as a strategic budget reform that could
improve public finances.

ZBB has several advantages that could improve public finances. Firstly, ZBB
ensures that all expenses are justified, and funds are allocated according to
priorities. This helps in identifying low-priority items and eliminating them, thus
reducing the government's overall expenditure (Drury, 2015). Secondly, ZBB
promotes transparency in budgeting since it requires justifying all expenses,
which can help in reducing corruption and misappropriation of funds
(Mashenene & Ngobeni, 2021). Thirdly, ZBB encourages participation and
involvement of stakeholders, such as citizens, in the budgeting process. This
helps in aligning the budget with the needs of the public, thus improving public
finances (Bogdan, 2016).

However, ZBB has some limitations that could hinder its effectiveness as a
strategic budget reform. Firstly, the process of justifying all expenses can be
time-consuming and resource-intensive, especially for large and complex
organizations like the government (Drury, 2015). Secondly, ZBB may be
challenging to implement since it requires a cultural shift in the organization's
mindset, which can be resistant to change (Mashenene & Ngobeni, 2021).
Thirdly, ZBB may not be suitable for all types of organizations, as some may
have fixed costs that cannot be reduced, making it challenging to implement
ZBB (Bogdan, 2016).

Conclusion
In conclusion, ZBB is a strategic budget reform that could improve public
finances by ensuring that funds are allocated according to priorities,
promoting transparency, and encouraging stakeholder participation. However,
the process of justifying all expenses can be time-consuming, and ZBB may
not be suitable for all types of organizations. Therefore, it is essential to
consider the advantages and limitations of ZBB when deciding whether to
adopt it as a strategic budget reform.
Question 4

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on economies


worldwide, including South Africa. This impact has been felt not only on the
economy but also on the country's fiscal framework. This essay will evaluate
the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on South Africa's fiscal framework, with
a focus on the reduction of domestic VAT and pay-as-you-earn in April and
May of 2020. In-text references and a bibliography will be included to support
the evaluation.

Impact on the fiscal framework: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a severe
impact on South Africa's fiscal framework. According to the 2020
Supplementary Budgetary Review, the sharp reductions in collections for
South Africa's two largest revenue items, domestic VAT and pay-as-you-earn,
were evident in April and May of 2020 (National Treasury, 2020). This
reduction in revenue can be attributed to the economic downturn caused by
the pandemic, which led to reduced economic activity and job losses.

Furthermore, the pandemic has resulted in increased government spending


on healthcare, social protection measures, and economic relief efforts. This
increased spending, coupled with the reduction in revenue, has widened the
country's budget deficit. The National Treasury estimated that the budget
deficit for the fiscal year 2020/2021 would increase from 6.8% to 14.6% of
GDP (National Treasury, 2020).

The widening budget deficit has also increased the country's debt levels. The
National Treasury projected that the country's gross debt-to-GDP ratio would
increase from 63.3% in 2019/2020 to 82.6% in 2020/2021 (National Treasury,
2020). The increase in debt levels has raised concerns about the
sustainability of the country's fiscal framework in the long term.

Conclusion
In conclusion, the COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on South
Africa's fiscal framework. The reduction in revenue due to the pandemic's
economic downturn, coupled with increased government spending, has
widened the country's budget deficit and increased its debt levels. In the long
term, this may pose a challenge to the sustainability of the country's fiscal
framework.
References

Mboweni, T. (2020). Supplementary Budget Speech by Tito Titus Mboweni,


MP Minister of Finance. Retrieved from
https://www.gov.za/speeches/minister-tito-mboweni-2020-supplementary-
budget-speech-23-jun-2020-0000., [Accessed 02 April 2023].

Makhaya, M. (2020, June 25). South Africa's COVID-19 response: A case of


too little, too late? Brookings Institution. Retrieved from
https://www.brookings.edu/blog/africa-in-focus/2020/06/25/south-africas-
covid-19-response-a-case-of-too-little-too-late/, [Accessed 02 April 2023].

National Treasury. (2020). Supplementary Budget Review 2020. Government


of South Africa. Retrieved from https://www.treasury.gov.za/default.aspx,
[Accessed 02 April 2023].

You might also like