Excellent Good Satisfactory Needs Improvement

Criteria TOTAL
(95-100) (90-94) (85-89) (80-84)
The group demonstrates a deep
understanding of the topic, The group exhibits a good grasp of The group demonstrates basic The group's understanding is
Content
showcasing comprehensive and the topic with accurate information, understanding, but there are notable limited, and there are significant
Knowledge
accurate knowledge. though some details may be lacking. gaps in knowledge and clarity. inaccuracies or misunderstandings.

The presentation is exceptionally The presentation is well-structured, The presentation has some The presentation lacks a clear
Presentation well-organized, with a clear featuring a clear introduction, organizational issues, making it structure, making it difficult for the
Structure introduction, coherent main logically arranged main points, and a somewhat challenging to follow. audience to follow the content.
points, and a strong conclusion. satisfactory conclusion.

All members actively contribute

Most team members actively Some team members are less Limited collaboration is evident,
Team to the presentation, demonstrating
contribute, though there may be engaged, impacting the overall affecting the quality of the
Collaboration excellent teamwork and
minor lapses in collaboration. cohesion of the presentation. presentation.
collaboration.

The group responds confidently, The group responds effectively to The group responds adequately to The group has difficulty responding
Response to addressing questions with clarity questions, showcasing a good questions but may struggle with to questions, indicating gaps in
Questions and demonstrating a deep understanding of the topic and the some aspects or require clarification. understanding.
understanding of the topic. ability to think critically.

OVERALL GRADE

PRE-ORAL DEFENSE 2023-2024

GROUP NO. ________ Section: _____________________
Panelist Name: __________________________ Date: ________________________________

FEEDBACK:
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________
Panelist Signature
 Excellent Good Satisfactory Needs Improvement
Criteria TOTAL
(95-100) (90-94) (85-89) (80-84)
The group demonstrates a deep
understanding of the topic, The group exhibits a good grasp of The group demonstrates basic The group's understanding is
Content
showcasing comprehensive and the topic with accurate information, understanding, but there are notable limited, and there are significant
Knowledge
accurate knowledge. though some details may be lacking. gaps in knowledge and clarity. inaccuracies or misunderstandings.

The presentation is exceptionally The presentation is well-structured, The presentation has some The presentation lacks a clear
Presentation well-organized, with a clear featuring a clear introduction, organizational issues, making it structure, making it difficult for the
Structure introduction, coherent main logically arranged main points, and a somewhat challenging to follow. audience to follow the content.
points, and a strong conclusion. satisfactory conclusion.

All members actively contribute

Most team members actively Some team members are less Limited collaboration is evident,
Team to the presentation, demonstrating
contribute, though there may be engaged, impacting the overall affecting the quality of the
Collaboration excellent teamwork and
minor lapses in collaboration. cohesion of the presentation. presentation.
collaboration.

The group responds confidently, The group responds effectively to The group responds adequately to The group has difficulty responding
Response to addressing questions with clarity questions, showcasing a good questions but may struggle with to questions, indicating gaps in
Questions and demonstrating a deep understanding of the topic and the some aspects or require clarification. understanding.
understanding of the topic. ability to think critically.

OVERALL GRADE

FINAL DEFENSE 2023-2024

GROUP 2 ST. CECILIA
Name: EDHEN A. BOISER, LPT Date: March 22, 2024

FEEDBACK:
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________
Panelist Signature
 Excellent Good Satisfactory Needs Improvement
Criteria TOTAL
(95-100) (90-94) (85-89) (80-84)
The group demonstrates a deep
understanding of the topic, The group exhibits a good grasp of The group demonstrates basic The group's understanding is
Content
showcasing comprehensive and the topic with accurate information, understanding, but there are notable limited, and there are significant
Knowledge
accurate knowledge. though some details may be lacking. gaps in knowledge and clarity. inaccuracies or misunderstandings.

The presentation is exceptionally The presentation is well-structured, The presentation has some The presentation lacks a clear
Presentation well-organized, with a clear featuring a clear introduction, organizational issues, making it structure, making it difficult for the
Structure introduction, coherent main logically arranged main points, and a somewhat challenging to follow. audience to follow the content.
points, and a strong conclusion. satisfactory conclusion.

All members actively contribute

Most team members actively Some team members are less Limited collaboration is evident,
Team to the presentation, demonstrating
contribute, though there may be engaged, impacting the overall affecting the quality of the
Collaboration excellent teamwork and
minor lapses in collaboration. cohesion of the presentation. presentation.
collaboration.

The group responds confidently, The group responds effectively to The group responds adequately to The group has difficulty responding
Response to addressing questions with clarity questions, showcasing a good questions but may struggle with to questions, indicating gaps in
Questions and demonstrating a deep understanding of the topic and the some aspects or require clarification. understanding.
understanding of the topic. ability to think critically.

OVERALL GRADE

FINAL DEFENSE 2023-2024

GROUP 3 ST. JOHN
Name: EDHEN A. BOISER, LPT Date: March 22, 2024

FEEDBACK:
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________
Panelist Signature
 Excellent Good Satisfactory Needs Improvement
Criteria TOTAL
(95-100) (90-94) (85-89) (80-84)
The group demonstrates a deep
understanding of the topic, The group exhibits a good grasp of The group demonstrates basic The group's understanding is
Content
showcasing comprehensive and the topic with accurate information, understanding, but there are notable limited, and there are significant
Knowledge
accurate knowledge. though some details may be lacking. gaps in knowledge and clarity. inaccuracies or misunderstandings.

The presentation is exceptionally The presentation is well-structured, The presentation has some The presentation lacks a clear
Presentation well-organized, with a clear featuring a clear introduction, organizational issues, making it structure, making it difficult for the
Structure introduction, coherent main logically arranged main points, and a somewhat challenging to follow. audience to follow the content.
points, and a strong conclusion. satisfactory conclusion.

All members actively contribute

Most team members actively Some team members are less Limited collaboration is evident,
Team to the presentation, demonstrating
contribute, though there may be engaged, impacting the overall affecting the quality of the
Collaboration excellent teamwork and
minor lapses in collaboration. cohesion of the presentation. presentation.
collaboration.

The group responds confidently, The group responds effectively to The group responds adequately to The group has difficulty responding
Response to addressing questions with clarity questions, showcasing a good questions but may struggle with to questions, indicating gaps in
Questions and demonstrating a deep understanding of the topic and the some aspects or require clarification. understanding.
understanding of the topic. ability to think critically.

OVERALL GRADE

FINAL DEFENSE 2023-2024

GROUP 4 ST. JOHN
Name: EDHEN A. BOISER, LPT Date: March 22, 2024

FEEDBACK:
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________
Panelist Signature
 Excellent Good Satisfactory Needs Improvement
Criteria TOTAL
(95-100) (90-94) (85-89) (80-84)
The group demonstrates a deep
understanding of the topic, The group exhibits a good grasp of The group demonstrates basic The group's understanding is
Content
showcasing comprehensive and the topic with accurate information, understanding, but there are notable limited, and there are significant
Knowledge
accurate knowledge. though some details may be lacking. gaps in knowledge and clarity. inaccuracies or misunderstandings.

The presentation is exceptionally The presentation is well-structured, The presentation has some The presentation lacks a clear
Presentation well-organized, with a clear featuring a clear introduction, organizational issues, making it structure, making it difficult for the
Structure introduction, coherent main logically arranged main points, and a somewhat challenging to follow. audience to follow the content.
points, and a strong conclusion. satisfactory conclusion.

All members actively contribute

Most team members actively Some team members are less Limited collaboration is evident,
Team to the presentation, demonstrating
contribute, though there may be engaged, impacting the overall affecting the quality of the
Collaboration excellent teamwork and
minor lapses in collaboration. cohesion of the presentation. presentation.
collaboration.

The group responds confidently, The group responds effectively to The group responds adequately to The group has difficulty responding
Response to addressing questions with clarity questions, showcasing a good questions but may struggle with to questions, indicating gaps in
Questions and demonstrating a deep understanding of the topic and the some aspects or require clarification. understanding.
understanding of the topic. ability to think critically.

OVERALL GRADE

FINAL DEFENSE 2023-2024

GROUP 1 ST. CECILIA
Name: MA LYN A. TUGAP Date: March 22, 2024

FEEDBACK:
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________
Panelist Signature
 Excellent Good Satisfactory Needs Improvement
Criteria TOTAL
(95-100) (90-94) (85-89) (80-84)
The group demonstrates a deep
understanding of the topic, The group exhibits a good grasp of The group demonstrates basic The group's understanding is
Content
showcasing comprehensive and the topic with accurate information, understanding, but there are notable limited, and there are significant
Knowledge
accurate knowledge. though some details may be lacking. gaps in knowledge and clarity. inaccuracies or misunderstandings.

The presentation is exceptionally The presentation is well-structured, The presentation has some The presentation lacks a clear
Presentation well-organized, with a clear featuring a clear introduction, organizational issues, making it structure, making it difficult for the
Structure introduction, coherent main logically arranged main points, and a somewhat challenging to follow. audience to follow the content.
points, and a strong conclusion. satisfactory conclusion.

All members actively contribute

Most team members actively Some team members are less Limited collaboration is evident,
Team to the presentation, demonstrating
contribute, though there may be engaged, impacting the overall affecting the quality of the
Collaboration excellent teamwork and
minor lapses in collaboration. cohesion of the presentation. presentation.
collaboration.

The group responds confidently, The group responds effectively to The group responds adequately to The group has difficulty responding
Response to addressing questions with clarity questions, showcasing a good questions but may struggle with to questions, indicating gaps in
Questions and demonstrating a deep understanding of the topic and the some aspects or require clarification. understanding.
understanding of the topic. ability to think critically.

OVERALL GRADE

FINAL DEFENSE 2023-2024

GROUP 2 ST. CECILIA
Name: MA LYN A. TUGAP Date: March 22, 2024

FEEDBACK:
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________
Panelist Signature
 Excellent Good Satisfactory Needs Improvement
Criteria TOTAL
(95-100) (90-94) (85-89) (80-84)
The group demonstrates a deep
understanding of the topic, The group exhibits a good grasp of The group demonstrates basic The group's understanding is
Content
showcasing comprehensive and the topic with accurate information, understanding, but there are notable limited, and there are significant
Knowledge
accurate knowledge. though some details may be lacking. gaps in knowledge and clarity. inaccuracies or misunderstandings.

The presentation is exceptionally The presentation is well-structured, The presentation has some The presentation lacks a clear
Presentation well-organized, with a clear featuring a clear introduction, organizational issues, making it structure, making it difficult for the
Structure introduction, coherent main logically arranged main points, and a somewhat challenging to follow. audience to follow the content.
points, and a strong conclusion. satisfactory conclusion.

All members actively contribute

Most team members actively Some team members are less Limited collaboration is evident,
Team to the presentation, demonstrating
contribute, though there may be engaged, impacting the overall affecting the quality of the
Collaboration excellent teamwork and
minor lapses in collaboration. cohesion of the presentation. presentation.
collaboration.

The group responds confidently, The group responds effectively to The group responds adequately to The group has difficulty responding
Response to addressing questions with clarity questions, showcasing a good questions but may struggle with to questions, indicating gaps in
Questions and demonstrating a deep understanding of the topic and the some aspects or require clarification. understanding.
understanding of the topic. ability to think critically.

OVERALL GRADE

FINAL DEFENSE 2023-2024

GROUP 3 ST. JOHN
Name: MA LYN A. TUGAP Date: March 22, 2024

FEEDBACK:
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________
Panelist Signature
 Excellent Good Satisfactory Needs Improvement
Criteria TOTAL
(95-100) (90-94) (85-89) (80-84)
The group demonstrates a deep
understanding of the topic, The group exhibits a good grasp of The group demonstrates basic The group's understanding is
Content
showcasing comprehensive and the topic with accurate information, understanding, but there are notable limited, and there are significant
Knowledge
accurate knowledge. though some details may be lacking. gaps in knowledge and clarity. inaccuracies or misunderstandings.

The presentation is exceptionally The presentation is well-structured, The presentation has some The presentation lacks a clear
Presentation well-organized, with a clear featuring a clear introduction, organizational issues, making it structure, making it difficult for the
Structure introduction, coherent main logically arranged main points, and a somewhat challenging to follow. audience to follow the content.
points, and a strong conclusion. satisfactory conclusion.

All members actively contribute

Most team members actively Some team members are less Limited collaboration is evident,
Team to the presentation, demonstrating
contribute, though there may be engaged, impacting the overall affecting the quality of the
Collaboration excellent teamwork and
minor lapses in collaboration. cohesion of the presentation. presentation.
collaboration.

The group responds confidently, The group responds effectively to The group responds adequately to The group has difficulty responding
Response to addressing questions with clarity questions, showcasing a good questions but may struggle with to questions, indicating gaps in
Questions and demonstrating a deep understanding of the topic and the some aspects or require clarification. understanding.
understanding of the topic. ability to think critically.

OVERALL GRADE

FINAL DEFENSE 2023-2024

GROUP 4 ST. JOHN
Name: MA LYN A. TUGAP Date: March 22, 2024

FEEDBACK:
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________
Panelist Signature
 Excellent Good Satisfactory Needs Improvement
Criteria TOTAL
(95-100) (90-94) (85-89) (80-84)
The group demonstrates a deep
understanding of the topic, The group exhibits a good grasp of The group demonstrates basic The group's understanding is
Content
showcasing comprehensive and the topic with accurate information, understanding, but there are notable limited, and there are significant
Knowledge
accurate knowledge. though some details may be lacking. gaps in knowledge and clarity. inaccuracies or misunderstandings.

The presentation is exceptionally The presentation is well-structured, The presentation has some The presentation lacks a clear
Presentation well-organized, with a clear featuring a clear introduction, organizational issues, making it structure, making it difficult for the
Structure introduction, coherent main logically arranged main points, and a somewhat challenging to follow. audience to follow the content.
points, and a strong conclusion. satisfactory conclusion.

All members actively contribute

Most team members actively Some team members are less Limited collaboration is evident,
Team to the presentation, demonstrating
contribute, though there may be engaged, impacting the overall affecting the quality of the
Collaboration excellent teamwork and
minor lapses in collaboration. cohesion of the presentation. presentation.
collaboration.

The group responds confidently, The group responds effectively to The group responds adequately to The group has difficulty responding
Response to addressing questions with clarity questions, showcasing a good questions but may struggle with to questions, indicating gaps in
Questions and demonstrating a deep understanding of the topic and the some aspects or require clarification. understanding.
understanding of the topic. ability to think critically.

OVERALL GRADE

FINAL DEFENSE 2023-2024

GROUP 1 ST. CECILIA
Name: MA. VICTORIA M. MACATO, LPT Date: March 22, 2024

FEEDBACK:
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________
Panelist Signature
 Excellent Good Satisfactory Needs Improvement
Criteria TOTAL
(95-100) (90-94) (85-89) (80-84)
The group demonstrates a deep
understanding of the topic, The group exhibits a good grasp of The group demonstrates basic The group's understanding is
Content
showcasing comprehensive and the topic with accurate information, understanding, but there are notable limited, and there are significant
Knowledge
accurate knowledge. though some details may be lacking. gaps in knowledge and clarity. inaccuracies or misunderstandings.

The presentation is exceptionally The presentation is well-structured, The presentation has some The presentation lacks a clear
Presentation well-organized, with a clear featuring a clear introduction, organizational issues, making it structure, making it difficult for the
Structure introduction, coherent main logically arranged main points, and a somewhat challenging to follow. audience to follow the content.
points, and a strong conclusion. satisfactory conclusion.

All members actively contribute

Most team members actively Some team members are less Limited collaboration is evident,
Team to the presentation, demonstrating
contribute, though there may be engaged, impacting the overall affecting the quality of the
Collaboration excellent teamwork and
minor lapses in collaboration. cohesion of the presentation. presentation.
collaboration.

The group responds confidently, The group responds effectively to The group responds adequately to The group has difficulty responding
Response to addressing questions with clarity questions, showcasing a good questions but may struggle with to questions, indicating gaps in
Questions and demonstrating a deep understanding of the topic and the some aspects or require clarification. understanding.
understanding of the topic. ability to think critically.

OVERALL GRADE

FINAL DEFENSE 2023-2024

GROUP 2 ST. CECILIA
Name: MA. VICTORIA M. MACATO, LPT Date: March 22, 2024

FEEDBACK:
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________
Panelist Signature
 Excellent Good Satisfactory Needs Improvement
Criteria TOTAL
(95-100) (90-94) (85-89) (80-84)
The group demonstrates a deep
understanding of the topic, The group exhibits a good grasp of The group demonstrates basic The group's understanding is
Content
showcasing comprehensive and the topic with accurate information, understanding, but there are notable limited, and there are significant
Knowledge
accurate knowledge. though some details may be lacking. gaps in knowledge and clarity. inaccuracies or misunderstandings.

The presentation is exceptionally The presentation is well-structured, The presentation has some The presentation lacks a clear
Presentation well-organized, with a clear featuring a clear introduction, organizational issues, making it structure, making it difficult for the
Structure introduction, coherent main logically arranged main points, and a somewhat challenging to follow. audience to follow the content.
points, and a strong conclusion. satisfactory conclusion.

All members actively contribute

Most team members actively Some team members are less Limited collaboration is evident,
Team to the presentation, demonstrating
contribute, though there may be engaged, impacting the overall affecting the quality of the
Collaboration excellent teamwork and
minor lapses in collaboration. cohesion of the presentation. presentation.
collaboration.

The group responds confidently, The group responds effectively to The group responds adequately to The group has difficulty responding
Response to addressing questions with clarity questions, showcasing a good questions but may struggle with to questions, indicating gaps in
Questions and demonstrating a deep understanding of the topic and the some aspects or require clarification. understanding.
understanding of the topic. ability to think critically.

OVERALL GRADE

PRE-ORAL DEFENSE 2023-2024

GROUP NO. ________ Section: _____________________
Panelist Name: _______________________________ Date: ________________________________

FEEDBACK:
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________
Panelist Signature
 Excellent Good Satisfactory Needs Improvement
Criteria TOTAL
(95-100) (90-94) (85-89) (80-84)
The group demonstrates a deep
understanding of the topic, The group exhibits a good grasp of The group demonstrates basic The group's understanding is
Content
showcasing comprehensive and the topic with accurate information, understanding, but there are notable limited, and there are significant
Knowledge
accurate knowledge. though some details may be lacking. gaps in knowledge and clarity. inaccuracies or misunderstandings.

The presentation is exceptionally The presentation is well-structured, The presentation has some The presentation lacks a clear
Presentation well-organized, with a clear featuring a clear introduction, organizational issues, making it structure, making it difficult for the
Structure introduction, coherent main logically arranged main points, and a somewhat challenging to follow. audience to follow the content.
points, and a strong conclusion. satisfactory conclusion.

All members actively contribute

Most team members actively Some team members are less Limited collaboration is evident,
Team to the presentation, demonstrating
contribute, though there may be engaged, impacting the overall affecting the quality of the
Collaboration excellent teamwork and
minor lapses in collaboration. cohesion of the presentation. presentation.
collaboration.

The group responds confidently, The group responds effectively to The group responds adequately to The group has difficulty responding
Response to addressing questions with clarity questions, showcasing a good questions but may struggle with to questions, indicating gaps in
Questions and demonstrating a deep understanding of the topic and the some aspects or require clarification. understanding.
understanding of the topic. ability to think critically.

OVERALL GRADE

FINAL DEFENSE 2023-2024

GROUP 4 ST. JOHN
Name: MA. VICTORIA M. MACATO, LPT Date: March 22, 2024

FEEDBACK:
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________
Panelist Signature