Module 5 - Beam Element
Module 5 - Beam Element
Module 5 - Beam Element
Beam Element
2 Beam Element
Beam Element
Assumptions:
• The beam is loaded only in the y direction (eventually we will extend the
concepts for z direction loading).
• The beam is prismatic, and the cross section has an axis of symmetry in the
plane of bending.
Center of curvature
Radius of curvature
Neutral surface
𝑼𝒏𝒅𝒆𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒎𝒆𝒅 𝒍𝒆𝒏𝒈𝒕𝒉 → 𝒅𝒙 = 𝝆𝒅𝜽
Engineer Renato Carvalho | Page 7
1 Elementary Beam Theory Strain is calculated as the variation in length divided by
the initial length of the small piece in study
Normal strain in the direction of the longitudinal axis as a result of bending is:
−𝑦 −𝑦 𝑑2 𝑣
𝜀𝑥 = = = −𝑦 2
𝜌 1 𝑑𝑥
𝑑2 𝑣
𝑑𝑥 2
𝑑2 𝑣
𝜎𝑥 = 𝐸𝜀𝑥 = −𝐸𝑦 2
𝑑𝑥
𝑑2 𝑣
𝜎𝑥 = 𝐸𝜀𝑥 = −𝐸𝑦 2
𝑑𝑥
Exercise
Calculate axial
stress due to
bending here
𝑭 = 𝟏𝟎 𝒌𝑵
A
ℎ = 80 𝑚𝑚
𝑦
𝑥
𝑧
𝑏 = 100 𝑚𝑚
𝑥 = 1000 𝑚𝑚
𝐿 = 1500 𝑚𝑚
Exercise
ℎ = 80 𝑚𝑚
𝑦
𝑏ℎ3 100 ∗ 803
𝐼𝑧 = = = 4266666.67 𝑚𝑚4 𝑧
12 12
𝑏 = 100 𝑚𝑚
Exercise
Calculate axial
stress due to
bending here
𝑭 = 𝟏𝟎 𝒌𝑵
A
𝑀 𝑥 = 1000 𝑚𝑚 = −10000 ∗ 1000 = −107 𝑁. 𝑚𝑚
𝑥
𝑀𝑦 −107
A 𝜎=− =− 𝑦 = 2.34𝑦
𝐼𝑧 4266666.67
𝑥 = 1000 𝑚𝑚
𝐿 = 1500 𝑚𝑚
Exercise
𝜎 = 2.34𝑦
2 Beam Element
Assumptions:
• The element is of length L and has two nodes, one at each end.
𝑥1 = 0
𝑥2 = 𝐿
Considering the four boundary conditions and the one-dimensional nature of the problem
in terms of the independent variable, we assume the displacement function in the form:
For the flexure element, it is convenient to introduce the dimensionless length coordinate
So that we get the following equation for deflection along the length of the element
𝑑𝑣 6𝑥 6𝑥 2 4𝑥 3𝑥 2 6𝑥 6𝑥 2 3𝑥 2 2𝑥
= − 2 + 3 𝑣1 + 1 − + 2 𝜃1 + 2 − 3 𝑣2 + − 𝜃2
𝑑𝑥 𝐿 𝐿 𝐿 𝐿 𝐿 𝐿 𝐿2 𝐿
𝑑2 𝑣 6 12𝑥 4 6𝑥 6 12𝑥 6𝑥 2
= − 2 + 3 𝑣1 + − + 2 𝜃1 + 2 − 3 𝑣2 + 2 − 𝜃
𝑑𝑥 2 𝐿 𝐿 𝐿 𝐿 𝐿 𝐿 𝐿 𝐿 2
2 Beam Element
𝐿
𝑭
𝑭 = 𝒌𝜹
𝛿
𝑭
𝜹𝟎
𝛿0 𝛿0
1 2
𝑊 = න 𝐹 . 𝑑𝛿 = න 𝑘𝛿𝑑𝛿 = 𝑘𝛿0 = 𝑈𝑒
0 0 2
2
1 2 1 𝐴𝐸 𝑃𝐿 1 𝑃 𝑃 1
𝑈𝑒 = 𝑘𝛿 = = 𝐴𝐿 = 𝜎𝜀𝑉
2 2 𝐿 𝐴𝐸 2 𝐴 𝐴𝐸 2
𝟏
𝑼𝒆 = 𝝈𝜺 𝑽
𝟐
𝑭𝒏
Castigliano’s First Theorem
𝑭𝟐
𝑑2 𝑣 𝑑2 𝑣
𝜎𝑥 = 𝐸𝜀𝑥 = −𝐸𝑦 2 𝜀𝑥 = −𝑦 2
𝑑𝑥 𝑑𝑥
Applying the first theorem of Castigliano to the strain energy function with respect to
nodal displacement 𝑣1 gives the transverse force at node 1 as:
while application of the theorem with respect to the rotational displacement gives
the moment as
The previous equations relate the four nodal displacement values to the four applied
nodal forces (here we use force in the general sense to include applied moments) and
are of the form
Prior to computing the stiffness coefficients, it is convenient to convert the integration to the
dimensionless length variable 𝝃 = 𝒙/𝑳 by noting
𝑥 𝑑𝜉 1
𝜉= → = → 𝑑𝑥 = 𝐿𝑑𝜉
𝐿 𝑑𝑥 𝐿
𝑥 𝑑 1 𝑑
𝜉= → =
𝐿 𝑑𝑥 𝐿 𝑑𝜉
Engineer Renato Carvalho | Page 39
3 Beam Element Stiffness Matrix Prior to computing the stiffness coefficients, it is convenient to
convert the integration to the dimensionless length variable
𝑥 𝑑 1 𝑑
𝜉= → =
𝐿 𝑑𝑥 𝐿 𝑑𝜉
2 Beam Element
Exercise
The figure depicts a statically indeterminate beam subjected to a transverse load applied
at the midspan. Using two flexure elements, obtain a solution for the midspan deflection.
Since the flexure element requires loading only at nodes, the elements are taken to be of length L/2, as shown.
The individual element stiffness matrices are then:
𝑣1 = 𝜃1 = 𝑣3 = 0
B.C
𝑣1 = 𝜃1 = 𝑣3 = 0
Substitution of the nodal displacement values into the constraint equations gives the reactions as
Attention!
2 Beam Element
The objective here is to determine the equivalent nodal loads so that the work
expressed by the previous equation is the same as
𝐹1𝑞 𝐹2𝑞
𝑀1𝑞 𝑀2𝑞
For example, for a uniform load q(x) = q = constant, integration of these equations yields:
Exercise
The simply supported beam shown in the figure below is subjected to a uniform transverse load, as
shown. Using two equal-length elements and work-equivalent nodal loads, obtain a finite element
solution for the deflection at midspan and compare it to the solution given by elementary beam theory.
B.C
𝑣1 = 𝑣3 = 0
Attention!
• The nodal displacement results from the finite element analysis of this
example are exactly the results obtained by a strength of materials
approach.
• However, the general deflected shape as given by the finite element
solution is not the same as the strength of materials result.
• The equation describing the deflection of the neutral surface is a
quartic function of x and, since the interpolation functions used in the
finite element model are cubic, the deflection curve varies somewhat
from the exact solution.
2 Beam Element
𝐴𝐸 1 −1
𝑘𝑒 =
𝐿 −1 1
Attention!
Stress Stiffening
For the present purpose, we assume the axial loads are such that these secondary effects are
not of concern and the axial loading is independent of bending effects. This being the case,
we can simply add the spar element stiffness matrix to the flexure element stiffness matrix
to obtain the 6 × 6 element stiffness matrix for a flexure element with axial loading as
Transformation Matrix
Before proceeding, note that it is convenient here to reorder the element stiffness matrix so that
the element displacement vector in the element reference frame is given as
In a manner exactly analogous to that of the bar element, it is readily shown that the 6 × 6 element
stiffness matrix in the global system is given by
Assembly of the system equations for a finite element model using the beam-axial
element is accomplished in an identical fashion to the procedures followed for trusses
Exercise
The frame shown in the figure below is composed of identical beams having a 1-in. square cross section and a
modulus of elasticity of 10 𝑥 106 𝑝𝑠𝑖. The supports at O and C are to be considered completely fixed. The
horizontal beam is subjected to a uniform load of intensity 10 lb/in., as shown. Use two beam-axial elements to
compute the displacements and rotation at B.
Choosing the global coordinate system and displacement numbering as in the figure of the problem
specification, we observe that element 2 requires no transformation, as its element coordinate system is
aligned with the global system. However, element 1 requires transformation. Using 𝜓 = 𝜋/2, we have:
Taking the constraints into account, the equations to be solved for the active
displacements are then
For the beam element with axial capability, the stress computation must take into account the
superposition of bending stress and direct axial stress. For element 1, for example, we use the
transformation matrix with 𝜓 = 𝜋/2 to compute the element displacement as:
𝑑2 𝑣 6 12𝑥 4 6𝑥 6 12𝑥 6𝑥 2
= − 2 + 3 𝑣1 + − + 2 𝜃1 + 2 − 3 𝑣2 + 2 − 𝜃
𝑑𝑥 2 𝐿 𝐿 𝐿 𝐿 𝐿 𝐿 𝐿 𝐿 2
2 Beam Element
12 6𝐿 −12 6𝐿
𝐸𝐼𝑦 6𝐿 4𝐿² −6𝐿 2𝐿²
𝑘𝑒 𝑥𝑦 = 3
𝐿 −12 −6𝐿 12 −6𝐿
𝑦 6𝐿 2𝐿² −6𝐿 4𝐿²
𝑣1 𝑞𝑦 (𝑥) 𝑣2
𝜃𝑧2
𝜃𝑧1
𝑥
Combining the spar element stiffness matrix, the xy plane flexure stiffness matrix, and the xz plane
flexure stiffness matrix, the element equilibrium equations for a two-plane bending element with axial
stiffness are written in matrix form as
[𝒌𝒆 ]
From elementary strength of materials, it is well known that the angle of twist per unit length of a uniform,
elastic circular cylinder subjected to torque T is given by
where J is polar moment of inertia of the cross-sectional area and G is the shear modulus of the material.
As the angle of twist per unit length is constant, the total angle of twist of the element can be expressed
in terms of the nodal rotations and twisting moments as
Consideration of the equilibrium condition 𝑀𝑥1 + 𝑀𝑥2 = 0 lead directly to the element equilibrium
equations:
Adding the torsional characteristics to the general beam element, the element equations become