2 PQRI 2021 - KASA Update Rosencrance FINAL v1

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 18

An Overview of FDA’s

KASA System

Susan Rosencrance, PhD


Director, OLDP/OPQ/CDER/FDA
Chair, FDA KASA Steering Committee
Introduction
Background • In the Office of Pharmaceutical Quality (OPQ)
we evaluate how a drug is formulated, how it
is manufactured, and the facilities used in the
manufacturing process to ensure a safe and
effective medication is being delivered to the
intended population.

• We also look at formulation and


Quality manufacturing changes made after a drug is
approved to ensure quality is maintained
throughout the product’s lifecycle.

2
Introduction
Background • For a regulatory assessment focused on
quality, a lifecycle approach that
underscores good knowledge management
is essential.

• And to be most efficient its important we


take advantage of modern IT tools and
platforms that emphasize structured data*
and the ability to capture critical
information.

* Structured data is highly specific and is stored in a predefined format so that its easily searchable, whereas unstructured
data is a conglomeration of many varied types of data that are stored in their native formats making it difficult to collect,
process, and analyze 3
Current Challenges to Assessing Quality

External Challenges:

• Volume of INDs, applications/supplements for new and generic


drugs, plus biologics;
• Expectations related to user fee programs; and
• Being accountable to the Commissioner, Congress, the
pharmaceutical industry, and the public.

4
Current Challenges to Assessing Quality

Internal Challenges:

• Regulatory assessments • Encumbers best practices for


traditionally based on knowledge sharing and

X
freestyle narratives (or managing critical information
unstructured text) and a across a product’s lifecycle.
summarization of
application information • An outdated approach that
with cut/paste data hinders the use of modern
tables. technology and our ability to
maximize efficiency.
5
Current Challenges to Assessing Quality

• The risk assessment and evaluation of the


applicant’s mitigation approaches gets
dispersed in lengthy text;
A narrative
• Knowledge management becomes
based quality cumbersome and the assessor’s ability to
assessment compare relative quality and risk across
drug products and facilities is hindered;
means
• The quality assessment becomes subjective
and based on the assessor’s expertise and
knowledge at hand which can lead to
inconsistent application of quality standards

6
Advancing Forward
We recognize the need to modernize
(20th → 21st century technology)

Move from narrative information to structured


data* in order to best capture/manage knowledge

* Structured data is highly specific and is stored in a predefined format so that its easily searchable, whereas unstructured
data is a conglomeration of many varied types of data that are stored in their native formats making it difficult to collect,
process, and analyze 7
Advancing Forward

The KASA System:


A data-based platform
N B
for structured quality
G
E
N
E
W
I
O assessments and
E L
R
I
D
R
O
G applications that
U
supports knowledge
C I
S G C
S S
management and
advanced analytics

KASA = Knowledge-aided Assessment and Structured Application


8
Objectives of the KASA System
The KASA system is being designed to:

1. Capture and manage knowledge


during the lifecycle of a drug product

2. Include established rules and


algorithms to measure the risk
associated with how a product is
designed and manufactured;

9
Objectives of the KASA System
The KASA system is being designed to:
3. Perform computer-aided analyses of
applications for a comparison of
regulatory standards and quality risk
across the repository of approved drug
products and facilities

4. Provide a structured assessment that


radically eliminates text-based narratives
and summarization of information from
the applications

10
An IT template allows FDA to capture
critical assessment information as
highly specific structured data in a
predefined format

11
The KASA Tool
The knowledge captured in KASA:
• Promotes objectivity and consistency in FDA’s
regulatory assessments by providing a broad view of
critical real-time information across the repository of
FDA approved drugs (e.g., controls on impurities across a
drug product line from brand to generic)
• Aids in identifying outliers in applications and facilities
so that emerging problems can be addressed quickly
(e.g., the need for inspection based on assessed
manufacturing capability)
• Improves overall efficiency and excels regulatory
decision making by assuring drugs dependably meet
high quality standards

12
What KASA Means for the FDA Quality Assessor

This is a more
efficient tool
for the
assessor

KASA captures and manages


knowledge and facilitates access
to internal data

13
The Development Process
• The first KASA prototype developed in 2016 was implemented in the
generic space given the large volume of submissions.
• Multiple iterations and improvements were made and tested
throughout 2017-2019
• Throughout 2020-21 FDA worked to transfer KASA to the cloud where it
is stored on FDA servers under a FISMA high environment, the strictest
level of control to ensure protection
• Moving forward there are plans to expand KASA to:
• Drug substances
• New drugs (INDs and NDAs)
• Post-approval changes (i.e., supplements)
• Biologics (BLAs and biosimilars)

14
The Future KASA System

= Knowledge-Aided Assessment
KASA (represents the internal piece)
Knowledge Management

= Structured Application
Generics New Drugs Biologics
(represents the external piece)

Two separate but linked initiatives that


Knowledge-Aided Assessment and
Structured Application
will facilitate the “SA” part of KASA:
• ICH M4Q (R1)
• PQ-CMC
The Future KASA System

ICH M4Q PQ-CMC


• Provides recommendations for applicants • A term used to describe
preparing the quality section (Modules 2 and 3) of manufacturing and quality control
a drug application information submitted to FDA in
• First drafted in 2002 by the International support of drug applications
Conference of Harmonization (ICH) • Actively establishing electronic
• Planning a revision process that advances the standards (data elements and
format of quality information to a structured terminologies) that will facilitate
format for easy access, analysis, and knowledge the FDA’ transition to a
management by regulatory bodies across the streamlined electronic review
globe environment
• Will facilitate a structured regulatory assessment
in FDA’s KASA system

16
The Future KASA System

KASA Structured Application


Knowledge Management

Generics New Drugs Biologics

What information is submitted? ICH M4Q


How is information organized?
revision
Knowledge-Aided Assessment and
Structured Application
Electronic data standards PQ-CMC

integrated set of tools and framework to aid content and organization of submission
regulatory assessment and knowledge and electronic data standards
management
The End Game

Leads to quality
Structured data drugs that are reliable
FDA is making IT throughout their
and knowledge
advancements to lifecycle
management will
modernize how
ensure consistency
regulatory
and objectivity in
assessments are
regulatory
conducted
decision making

18

You might also like