Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 13 views

    A Nested Case-Control Study

    Uploaded by

    Shoe
    EP717 Module 5 - Epidemiologic StudyDesigns – Part 2: Case-Control Studies

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    A Nested Case-Control Study

    Uploaded by

    Shoe
    13 views2 pages
    EP717 Module 5 - Epidemiologic StudyDesigns – Part 2: Case-Control Studies

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    EP717 Module 5 - Epidemiologic StudyDesigns – Part 2: Case-Control Studies

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    13 views2 pages

    A Nested Case-Control Study

    Uploaded by

    Shoe
    EP717 Module 5 - Epidemiologic StudyDesigns – Part 2: Case-Control Studies

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 2

    EP717 Module 5 - Epidemiologic Study

    Designs – Part 2:
    Case-Control Studies

    A Nested Case-Control Study


    Now consider a hypothetical prospective cohort study among 89,949 women in whom the investigators took blood samples and froze
    them at baseline for possible future use. After following the cohort for 12 years the investigators wanted to investigate a possible
    association between the pesticide DDT and breast cancer. Since they had frozen blood samples collected at baseline, they had the
    option of having the samples tested for DDT levels. If they had done this, the table below shows what they would have found.

    Br. Cancer No Br. Cancer Total Exposed

    DDT high 360 13,276 13,636

    DDT low 1,079 75,234 76,313

    Column Totals 1,439 88,510 89,949

    If they had had this data, they could have calculated the risk ratio:

    RR = (360/13,636) / (1,079/76,313) = 1.87

    However, the cost of analyzing each sample for DDT was $20, and to analyze all of them would have cost close to $1.8 million. So, like
    the previous study, the exposure data was very costly.

    Although this was a prospective cohort study, we could regard the cohort as a source population and conduct a case-control study
    drawing samples from the cohort. We could, for example, analyze the blood samples on all of the women who had developed breast
    cancer during the 12 year follow up and on 2,878 randomly selected samples from the women without breast cancer (i.e., twice as
    many controls as cases). This would be described as a nested case-control study, i.e., nested within a cohort study.

    The results might have looked like this:

    Br. Cancer No Br. Cancer Total Exposed

    DDT high 360 432 Unknown

    DDT low 1,079 2,446 Unknown

    Column Totals 1,439 2,878 -

    Odds Ratio = (a/c) / (b/d) = (360/1,079) / (432/2,446)

    = 1.89 during the 12 year follow up study

    So, they could achieve an odds ratio that is very close to what the risk ratio would have been at a much lower cost: (1,439+2,878) x $20
    = $86,340.

    Key Concept:
    It is useful to think of all case-control studies as being nested, i.e., nested
    within a particular source populations.

    Interpretation of the Odds Ratio


    The odds ratio is a legitimate measure of association, and, when the outcome of interest is uncommon, it provides a good estimate of
    what the risk ratio would have been if a cohort study had been possible. When looking at increasingly common outcomes, the odds
    ratio gives estimates that are more extreme than the risk ratio, i.e., further away from the null value.

    Not surprisingly, the interpretation of an odds is therefore similar to the interpretation of a risk ratio.

    The null value (no difference) is 1.0.


    Odds ratios > 1 suggest an increase in risk
    Odds ratios < 1 suggest a decrease in risk
    The odds ratio above would be interpreted as follows:

    "Women with high DDT blood levels at baseline had 1.89 times the odds of developing breast cancer compared to women with low
    blood levels of DDT during the 12 year observation period."

    Test Yourself

    A case-control study examined the association between playing video games versus not playing video games, and
    development of high blood pressure among adolescents from 2012-2015. The data from the study is presented in the
    contingency table below.

    Played Video Did Not Play Video Games Total


    Games

    Cases 57 33 90
    Controls 108 162 270

    Calculate the odds ratio for the association between playing video games and development of hypertension. Interpret the odds ratio
    you calculate in a sentence. See if you can do both of these correctly before looking at the answer.

    Answer

    Recap of Case-Control Design


    Case-Control Studies have the same goal as other analytic studies: to compare the incidence of disease in the exposed and
    unexposed groups, but the strategy is different, making them much more efficient for:

    rare outcomes
    dynamic populations
    when information on past exposures is difficult to get.

    When conducting case-control studies, investigators begin by finding cases with the health outcome of interest and then find a sample
    of non-diseased controls who came from the same source population that produced the cases. The magnitude of association is
    expressed as the odds ratio, which is the odds of disease among the exposed subjects relative to the odds of disease among the non-
    exposed subjects.

    You might also like