UT Exam
UT Exam
UT Exam
1. Any changes in the procedure which are identified as essential variables require
requalification of the procedure?
c. Any change in nonessential variables and essential variable requires requalification of the procedure.
d. Not specified.
a. Essential variable.
b. Nonessential variable.
c. Not specified.
3. On what metal surfaces Couplants used with more than 250 ppm of halides can be
detrimental?
b. Titanium
4. What actions can be taken if the calibration block is not the same material form or has not
received the same heat treatment on which ultrasonic testing need to be performed?
b. Transfer correction for acoustical property differences is used. Nonmandatory Appendices S and U (as
applicable) may be used.
c. Cannot use as there will be acoustical property differences in the calibration block and material.
d. Not specified.
5. The calibration block surface is deterred and the surface of the component being examined is
smooth is there will be any consequences?
a. As the frequency and velocity will be same in the component and calibration block there will be no
differences in the sensitivity of the ultrasonic examination.
b. The calibration block surface shall be representative of the component’s surface for maximum
sensitivity and similarities in acoustical properties.
c. Surface of the calibration block and component should be smooth only to stop wear and tear of the
transducers.
6. For examinations in materials where the examination surface diameter is greater than 20 in.
(500 mm) which blocks can be used?
d. Both flat basic calibration and same curvature calibration blocks may be used.
7. The allowable range limit for the use of curved basic calibration blocks for materials with
surface diameter less than 20 in. (500 mm) is?
c. Any curvature block can be used for material blocks for materials with surface diameter less than 20
in. (500mm).
8. For example, an 8 in. (200 mm) diameter block may be used to calibrate for examinations on
surfaces in the range of curvature from?
9. From Figure T-434.2.1 Non-piping Calibration Blocks for a material thickness of 21 mm what
can be the calibration block thickness?
b. 19 mm or more.
10. During ultrasonic raster scanning all indications on the display should be considered
relevant?
a. Yes, any indication from the material volume shall be considered relevant indication.
b. No, since certain metallurgical discontinuities and geometric conditions may produce indications that
are not relevant.
c. Any indication can be considered relevant if it’s orientation is perpendicular to the ultrasound beam.
d. Any indication’s length crossing the acceptance standard shall be considered relevant.
11. The Indications which are crossing _______ amplitude shall be evaluated?
a. Indications crossing 20 %
12. For Scanning with weld reinforcement the Reflectors which are Transverse to the Weld
Seam can be found by?
c. The angle beam shall be directed from 0 deg to 60 deg with respect to the weld axis in both axial
directions.
d. The angle beam shall be directed from 0 deg to 90 deg with respect to the weld axis in both axial
directions.
13. The scanning sensitivity level shall be set a minimum of?
14. If the sensitivity setting levels changes by 2dB what steps can be followed?
b. If sensitivity decreases the area covered by the voided data shall be reexamined.
c. No need of any changes in the examination pattern as the sensitivity changes does not make any
differences.
a. Follow the same examination pattern without any changes in the sensitivity settings.
b. Calibration check shall be made on the basic calibration block to verify that distance range points and
sensitivity setting satisfy the requirements.
c. New range points and sensitivity setting need to be correlated with old examination system.
d. Once the range points and sensitivity setting no change in the examination pattern shall be allowed.
16. The minimum distance increments necessary to generate the distance range calibration and
the distance–amplitude correction?
a. Up to T (thickness)
b. Up to 2T (thickness)
c. Up to 3T (thickness)
d. Up to 0.5T (thickness)
17. The minimum number of points required generating the distance–amplitude correction?
b. 3 points
c. 2 points
d. Not specified
18. When any points of the distance–amplitude correction fell below 20% FSH then _____?
19. For contact examination, the temperature differential between the calibration block and
examination surfaces shall be within______?
a. 5°C to 52°C
b. 14°C.
c. 14°C to 28°C
d. 10°C
20. For the Linearity checks of the equipment with two holes at 1 /2T and 3 /4T thickness
ranges the ratio of amplitudes between the indications shall be___?
a. 1:1
b. 2:1
c. 1:1
d. 4:1
21. From mandatory appendix II if the change is -6dB the signal drops from 80% FSH to 25%
then the linearity is acceptable?
a. 11% to 8%
b. 8% to 11%
c. 10% to 20%
d. Not specified
23. From Figure T-434.3-1 Calibration Block for Piping for OD < 4 in. the minimum arc length
shall be?
a. 8 in.
b. 3T
e. Both c & d.
24. 14 In. diameter curvature calibration block has a thickness of 19 mm up to what range of
thickness and diameter this block can be used in reference to Figure T-434.3-1 Calibration Block
for Piping?
25. From Figure T-434.1.7.2 Ratio Limits for Curved Surfaces a total of how many calibration
blocks are needed for a diameter curvature of 0.94 in. to 20 in.?
d. Contain an indication from the beam paths required to reach the various calibration reflectors.
b. The base metal shall be scanned by straight beam for laminar flaws.
c. Only the weld metal without reinforcement shall be scanned by straight beam.
28. If the search unit position within the scanner has changed more than 1 /16 in. (1.5 mm), all
data since the last valid search unit position check shall be marked void and the area covered by
the voided data shall be reexamined?
a. True.
b. False.
c. Not specified.
29. The calibration shall not provide which of the following measurements?
b. Distance–amplitude
c. Echo amplitude measurement from the surface notch in the basic calibration block.
30. When reflector signal-to-noise ratio precludes effective indication evaluation and
characterization?