Man Repo Art
Man Repo Art
Man Repo Art
BRIEF INTRODUCTION: -
The Workmen's Compensation Act (Act VIII of 1923) came into force
from 1st July, 1924. It applies to the whole of India, including the
State of Jammu and Kashmir. The Act provides for the payment of
compensation by certain. classes of employers to their workmen, for
injury by accidents. The Workmen's Compensation Act does not
apply to factories covered by the Employees State Insurance Act.The
Amendment of 1976. The Workmen's Compensation (Amendment)
Act, 1976, was passed with the object of providing suitable scales of
compensation for the higher wage levels beyond Rs. 500. The reason
is that all wages have been increased. Before the amendment, the
Act covered workmen whose wages did not exceed Rs. 500 per
month.Prior to the passing of this Act, the employer was liable to pay
compensation only if he was guilty of negligence. Even in case of
proved negligence, the employer could get rid of his liability by using
any of the following defences. The Doctrine of Assumed Risks. If the
employee knew the nature of tte risks he was undertaking when
working in a factory, the employer had no liability for injuries. The
court assumed in such case that the workman had voluntarily
accepted the risks incidental to his work. The doctrine followed from
the rule V olenti Non Fit Injuria, which means that one, who has
volunteered to take a risk of injury, is not entitled to damages if
injury actually occurs.The Doctrine of Common Employment. Under
this rule, when several Persons work together for a common purpose
and one of them is injured by some act or omission of another, the
employer is not liable to pay compensation for the injury.The
Doctrine of Contributory Negligence: Under this rule' a person is not
entitled to damages for injury if he was himself guilty of negligence
and such negligence contributed to the injury.The three aforesaid
defences and the rule "no negligence no liability made It almost
impossible for an employee to obtain relief in cases of accident. The
Workmen's Compensation Act of 1923 radically changed the law.
According to this Act, the employer is liable to pay compensation
irrespective of negligence. The Act looks upon compensation as relief
to the workman and not as damages payable by the employer for a
wrongful act or tort. Hence contributory negligence by the employee
does not disentitle him from relief. For the same reason, it is not
possible for the employer to plead to the defence of common
employment or assumed risks for the purpose of avoiding liability.An
injured workman may, if he wishes, file a civil suit for damages
against the employer. Section 3(5) of the Workmen's Compensation
Act, however, provides that if such a suit is filed, compensation
cannot be claimed under the Act and if compensation has been
claimed under the Act, or if an agreement has been entered into
between the employer and the workman for the payment
of .compensation, no suit can be filed in the civil court. Thus the
workman has to choose between two reliefs civil suit for damages
and (ii) claim for compensation under the Act.
PROPOSED METHODOLOGY: -
If you're looking to propose a methodology related to the implementation or
analysis of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, you might want to
consider the following steps:
Understanding the Act:Begin by thoroughly studying the provisions of the
Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923. Understand the eligibility criteria, types
of compensations, and the obligations of employers under the Act.
Stakeholder Identification:Identify and categorize the stakeholders involved,
including employers, employees, insurance providers, and regulatory
authorities. Understanding their perspectives is crucial for effective
implementation.
Legal Compliance Check:Conduct a comprehensive review of existing practices
within organizations to ensure compliance with the Act. Identify any gaps or
areas that need improvement.
Amount of compensation