Introduction

India, being one of the biggest countries in the world with a fabulous
population has a very strong judiciary system which is inherent with the
structure of the courts and its hierarchy and the judicial system. This system
provides livelihood to huge number of professionals attached with the system
of judiciary in different forms and thus serve the nation with the service. In
this essay, the structural pattern of judiciary system will be narrated with the
hierarchical type of courts effectively take part in the judiciary system and
the different personalities engaged in this profession to play different roles
assigned to them.

Because of the size of the country, the judiciary system is planned as

per the requirement of the citizen of India with the location of courts
as per status to serve the community of India with efficiency. India
has a rich tradition of providing justice to the affected and the courts in
various levels are there to serve the purpose of extending highest level of
efficient juridical system all over the country.

The court structure is set as per the judiciary system prevailing in

India with differentiation of applicability as per the merit of the
case. The normal trend of the judiciary system is to start any general
dispute in the lower court which is being escalated as per the satisfaction of
the parties to the higher courts.

The hierarchical structure of court is being endorsed by the

Constituency of India with the level of power exercised by the different
level of courts. The judgments can be challenged in the higher courts if the
parties to the cases are not satisfied. The process of escalation is systematic
and thus the system of providing maximum level of satisfaction to the parties
is sincerely tried by the judiciary system.

In this present essay, we will highlight the two aspects of judiciary system in
India –

• Hierarchy of courts in India

• The judicial system of India

Hierarchy of Indian Courts

The feature Indian judiciary system is its hierarchical structure of courts.
There are different levels of judiciary system in India empowered with
distinct type of courts. The courts are structured with very strong judiciary
and hierarchical system as per the powers bestowed upon them. This
system is strong enough to make limitation of court with its
jurisdiction and exercise of the power. The Supreme Court of India is
placed at the top of the hierarchical position followed by High Courts in the
regional level and lower courts at micro level with the assignment of power
and exercising of the same for the people of India.

Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court of India is the highest level of court of Indian
juridical system which was established as per Part V, Chapter IV of the
Constitution of India which endorses the concept of Supreme Court as the
Federal Court to play the role of the guardian of the esteemed constitution of
India with the status of the highest level of court in the status of appeal
cases.

• Constitution Regulation
As conferred by Articles 124 to 147 of Indian Constituency, the jurisdiction
and composition of the Supreme Court is being fixed. This court is
primarily of the status of appellate court. This court is accepting the
appeals of cases which are being heard in the High courts situated in
different states and union territories with dissatisfaction of related parties.
This court also accepts writ petitions with the suspected occurrence of
activities which may infer about violation of human rights and subsequent
petitions are accepted to hear and judge the consequences of such
happenings.

These types of petitions are accepted under Article 32 of Indian

constitution. This article confers the right to ensure remedies through
constitution. This court also hears about such serious issues which need to be
attended with immediate attention.

• History
This court has started its operation since 28th January 1950 with the
inaugural sitting, the day since when the constitution of independent India
had been effectively applicable. The court had already taken care of more
than 24,000 judgments as per report of the Supreme Court.

• Structure and Application

This court is comprised of the Chief Justice along with 30 other
judges to carry on the operation of the court. The proceeding of the
Supreme Court is being heard only in the language of English. The Supreme
Court is governed by the Supreme Court Rules which was published in
the year 1966.

The same had been fixed under the Article number 145 of the Constitution of
India to ensure the regulation of procedures and practices of the Supreme
Court. This article is passing through the process of upgrading with the
presently enforced Article as per the Supreme Court Rules, 2013.

High Court of India

• Constitution
High Courts are second Courts of Importance of the democracy of
India. They are run by Article 141 of the Constitution of India. They are
governed by the bindings conferred by the Supreme Court of India so far
judgments and orders are concerned. The Supreme Court of India is the
highest level of courts and is responsible for fixing the guidance to the High
Courts set by precedence.

High courts are the types of courts which are instituted as the courts
powered by constitution with the effect of Article 214 Part IV Chapter V of
the Indian Constitution. There are 24 high courts in India taking care of the
regional juridical system of India out of which Kolkata High Court is the
oldest.

• Jurisdiction
These courts are mainly confined to the jurisdiction of state, group of
states or Union Territory. They are being empowered to govern the
jurisdiction of lower courts like family, civil and criminal courts with other
different courts of the districts. These courts are of the statute of principal
civil courts so far originality of jurisdiction is concerned in the related domain
of the states and the other district courts.

These courts are treated as subordinate to High Courts by status. But High
Courts are mainly exercising their jurisdiction related to civil or criminal
domain if the lower courts are proved incapable of exercising their power as
per authorization extended by law. These situations may be generated
through the inability of financial or territorial jurisdiction. There are specific
areas in which only High Courts can exercise the right for hearing like cases
related to Company Law as it is designated specially in a state or federal law.

But normally the high courts are involved in the appeals raised in the
cases of lower courts with the writ petitions as conferred in Article 226 of
the Constitution of India. The area of writ petitions is also the sole
jurisdiction of high courts. The jurisdiction of High Court is varying so far
territorial jurisdiction is considered.

• Official structure and application

The appointment of the judges of High Courts are being executed by
the President of India with the consultation of the Chief Justice of India,
the Chief Justice of High Court and the Governor of the state or union
territory.

Decision on the number of judges in High Court is mainly dictated

considering the higher number of either the average of organization of main
cases for the last years as per the average nationally calculated or the
average rate of main cases disposed per judge per year in the respective
high court.

The high courts with handling of most of the cases of a particular area are
provided with the facility of permanent benches or branches of the court
situated there only. To serve the complainants of remote regions the
establishment of circuit benches had been made to facilitate the service with
the schedule of operation as per the occurrence of visit of the judge.

Lower Courts of India

• District Courts

• Constitution
The basis of structuring of district courts in India is mainly
depending upon the discretion of the state governments or the union
territories. The structure of those courts is mainly made considering several
factors like the number of cases, distribution of population, etc. Depending
upon those factors the state government takes the decision of numbers of
District Courts to be in operation for single district or clubbing together
different adjacent districts.

Normally these types of courts exercise their power of juridical

service in district level. These courts are covered by the administrative
power of the High Courts under which the district courts are covered. The
judgments of the district courts are subject to review to the appellate
jurisdiction of the respective high court.

•Structure and Jurisdiction

The district courts are mainly run by the state government appointed
district judges. There are additional district judges and assistant district
judges who are there to share the additional load of the proceedings of
District Courts. These additional district judges have equal power like the
district judges for the jurisdiction area of any city which has got the status of
metropolitan area as conferred by the state government. These district
courts have the additional jurisdictional authority of appeal handling over the
subordinate courts which are there in the same district specifically in the
domain of civil and criminal affairs.

The subordinate courts covering the civil cases, in this aspect are considered
as Junior Civil Judge Court, Principal Junior and Senior Civil Judge
Court, which are also known as Sub Courts, Subordinate Courts. All
these courts are treated with ascending orders. The subordinate courts
covering the criminal cases are Second Class Judicial Magistrate Court,
First Class Judicial Magistrate Court, and Chief Judicial Magistrate
Court along with family courts which are founded to deal with the issues
related to disputes of matrimonial issues only. The status of Principal Judge
of family court is at par with the District Judges.

There are in total 351 district courts in operation out of which 342 are of
states while 9 are of union territories.

• Village Courts

• Constitution Structures and Features

The village courts are named as Lok Adalat or Nyaya Panchyat which
means the service of justice extended to the villagers of India. This is the
system for resolving disputes in micro level. The need of these courts is
justified though the Madras Village Court Act of 1888. This act is followed
by the development post 1935 in different provinces, which are re-termed as
different states after the independence of 1947.

This conceptual model had been started to be sued from the state of Gujarat
consisting of a judge and two assessors since 1970s. The Law Commission
had recommended in 1984 to form the Nyaya Panchayats in the rural areas
with the people of educational attainment. The latest development had been
observed in 2008 through initiation of Gram Nyaylayas Act which had
sponsored the concept of installation of 5000 mobile courts throughout the
country. These courts are assigned to judge the petty cases related to civil
and criminal offence which can generate the penalty of up to 2 years
imprisonment.

So far the available statistics of 2012 there are only 151 Gram Nyaylayas
which are functional in this big country which is far below the targeted
figures of 5000 mobile courts. While trying to find the basic reasons for this
non achievement, it was found as financial constraints followed by shown
reluctance by the lawyers, respective government officials and police.
The Hierarchical Structure of Indian Courts

Judicial System of India

The present judicial system of India is being made effective through the
Constitution of India. The judicial system of India is mainly consisting of
three types of courts- the Supreme Court, The High Courts and the
subordinate courts. The effective rules and regulations are made of the
Constitution and other laws and regulation structured mainly upon the basis
of British Law with the improvised version suitable for India.

These rules and regulation along with the Constitution are elementary in
fixing the composition, jurisdiction and power of the respective courts. The
below discussion will highlight the features and the roles of the three types of
courts so far the judicial system of India is concerned.
Supreme Court- Its role in the judicial system
This court is with the status of the highest level of courts as per Chapter IV
of Part V of the Indian Constitution. This court is situated in the capital of
India, New Delhi. The panel of judges is comprised of Chief Justice and
twenty other Judges.

• Appointment of Judges
The judges of Supreme Court are being appointed by the President of
India. The system is to send the panel of probable judges by the Chief
Justice of Supreme Court through collegiums to the President of India with
the approval of the Central Government.

The qualifications and the conditions of the judges so far appointment and
the tenure of service are fixed as per below:

• He should be the citizen of India.

• He should have the experience of serving as the Judge of High
Court for a minimum period of at least five years or he should be
an advocate of High Court for at least ten years or he should be
considered by the President as a distinctive jurist.
• The Judge of the Supreme Court is eligible for performing his duties
by holding office up to the age of sixty five year if he has not
resigned or disqualified on the basis of any act of misbehavior or
proving incapable of holding his duties.

• Jurisdiction of Supreme Court

The jurisdiction of Supreme Court is classified under different types:

Original jurisdiction: The Supreme Court exercises original jurisdiction

exclusively to hear the cases of disputes between the Central Government
and the State Governments or the interest of the States. The Supreme Court
has original but not exclusive jurisdiction for enforcement of Fundamental
Rights as per the provision of Constitution of India through the way of writs.

Appellate Jurisdiction: The Supreme Court has the jurisdiction of hearing

the appeal raised against the judgment of all High Courts of India provided
the respective High Court grants the certificate related to the query about
the interpretation of the Constitution of India. In case of any civil dispute, if
the High Court thinks that the intervention of Supreme Court is required to
resolve substantial query of law regarding importance in general is there and
the High Court infers that the specific query is to be decided by the Supreme
Court.

In case of any criminal dispute, if the High Court thinks that the same is
to be heard by the Supreme Court. It is the discretionary power of the
Supreme Court to hear any criminal case without the certificate of High Court
against the judgment conferred by High Court through which any verdict of
death sentence is being pronounced while reversing the original judgment of
the lower court of release order to the accused or in case of withdrawal of
case from the lower court.

Supreme Court has the power to exercise extra ordinary

jurisdiction to hear any appeal related to any matter for which any court or
tribunal had decided with judgment through the option of special leave
petition except the case of tribunal related to armed Forces. Supreme Court
has the power to withdraw or transfer any case from any High Court. The
Supreme Court has the authority to review any verdict ordered. The law of
Supreme Court is put the binding on all courts across India. Even the
Supreme Court has the authority to create any rule of government with the
approval from the President of India. Supreme Court is defined as the Court
of record with the right to make punishment for the contempt of court.

Advisory jurisdiction: The Supreme Court has the option to report its
opinion to the President about any questions raised of public importance
referred by the President.

The High Courts- Its role in the judicial system

The Constitution of India has conferred the provision regarding the judicial
system through Chapter V of Part Vi for high courts. The main features are
discussed below:

• Establishment
The Constitution conferred that each state or more than one state should
have one High Court. The Union Territories of Manipur, Goa and Tripura
have the judicial Commissioner Courts. The Constitution has made
provision for the other Union Territories to establish high courts.

• Court of Record
All the High Courts have the power to pronounce punishment for contempt of
court and thus, they will be treated as Court of Record.
 • Appointment of Judges
The appointment of the Judges of High Court is done by the President of
India with the consultation of the Chief Justice of India, the Chief Justice of
respective high Court and the Governor of the state.

• Number of Judges
The President of India has the authority to fix the number of judges of the
High Court as per requirement. The basic factor for this purpose is being
settled though the central executive which can decide about the number of
judges in High Court which is being decided with flexible attitude.

• Qualification of Judges
A person, being the citizen of India with holding the judicial office in India for
10 years or an advocate of High Court for 10 years is eligible for being the
Judge of High Court.

• Tenure of service
The judges of the High Court have the maximum period of service up to
sixty-two years. Till then they cannot be removed from their duties if any
occurrence of misbehaviour or incapability is proved and seconded by two
third of members of both houses of parliament through voting.

• Salary of Judges
This is done as per prescribed declaration in the second schedule of the
Constitution and cannot be changed without any amendment of the
Constitution.

• Revenue
The old-fashioned restriction since 1915 regarding revenue is being outdated
on the original jurisdiction of the High Courts of Kolkata, Chennai and
Mumbai.

• Writ Jurisdiction and Superintendence

Except for High Courts of Kolkata, Chennai and Mumbai none has the
power to issue the privileged writs. At present Article 226 of Constitution
of India has given the power to the high Courts to issue different writs.
Article 227 of Indian Constitution has empowered all high courts to
practice superintendence over all the courts of tribunal effective within the
regional jurisdiction of the High Court.

Subordinate Courts of India

Chapter VI of Part VI of the Indian Constitution has made provisions
for subordinate courts related to the judicial system. These courts are
in the state level under the direct superintendence of High Court. The
activities like appointment promotion and posting of judges are made by the
Governor of the state by consulting respective High Court.

The criterion of eligibility of district judge is that he must be an advocate for

minimum seven years with the recommendation of the respective high court.
Respective High Court has the sole discretionary power related to the
administrative matters like posting, promotion or leave which can be
conferred by the conditions of service as per the law applicable for
subordinate courts.

Panchayats
As per the provisions made in Part IV of the Constitutions, the
directive of panchayats is fixed which endorses the concept of self-
governance through Article 40 of this part. The panchayats are there in the
rural area to resolve the issues related to civil or criminal issues by following
the simple system of informal application to enhance to scope of compromise
between the parties. Article 50 had made provision separating the judiciary
from the administrative executive deployed in the public services of the
state.

Conclusion
With the above essay, the hierarchy of the courts and justice system in India
had been properly discussed with the emphasis given on the judicial system
of the country. It is evident that the role of the Constitution of India plays a
major role in this aspect with the help of other rules and laws enforced from
time to time to strengthen the judiciary system of the country.

It is often questioned if the three-layer judicial system is at all necessary or

not for the purpose of running the judicial system of the country. It is evident
from the strong base and the proven utility of the courts, that a big country
like India does need this existing system of judiciary process to ensure the
best possible judiciary to the citizen of India.
It is to be kept in mind the numbers of human resources deployed in the
system through direct or ancillary services related to judicial system and with
their constant endeavour, the judiciary system proves to be efficient keeping
in mind the number of disputes raised every day and the level of response
extended by the courts refer to the disputes.