The document discusses vital pulp therapy for cariously exposed permanent teeth and its limitations. It outlines that in mature permanent teeth, pulpectomy and root canal treatment is usually preferred over vital pulp therapy. For young permanent teeth with incomplete root development, pulpotomy may be attempted to encourage continued root development, but it does not have long term success comparable to root canal treatment. Major limitations of vital pulp therapy include unpredictability, lack of long term success, and difficulty accurately diagnosing a pulp's ability to repair.
The document discusses vital pulp therapy for cariously exposed permanent teeth and its limitations. It outlines that in mature permanent teeth, pulpectomy and root canal treatment is usually preferred over vital pulp therapy. For young permanent teeth with incomplete root development, pulpotomy may be attempted to encourage continued root development, but it does not have long term success comparable to root canal treatment. Major limitations of vital pulp therapy include unpredictability, lack of long term success, and difficulty accurately diagnosing a pulp's ability to repair.
The document discusses vital pulp therapy for cariously exposed permanent teeth and its limitations. It outlines that in mature permanent teeth, pulpectomy and root canal treatment is usually preferred over vital pulp therapy. For young permanent teeth with incomplete root development, pulpotomy may be attempted to encourage continued root development, but it does not have long term success comparable to root canal treatment. Major limitations of vital pulp therapy include unpredictability, lack of long term success, and difficulty accurately diagnosing a pulp's ability to repair.
The document discusses vital pulp therapy for cariously exposed permanent teeth and its limitations. It outlines that in mature permanent teeth, pulpectomy and root canal treatment is usually preferred over vital pulp therapy. For young permanent teeth with incomplete root development, pulpotomy may be attempted to encourage continued root development, but it does not have long term success comparable to root canal treatment. Major limitations of vital pulp therapy include unpredictability, lack of long term success, and difficulty accurately diagnosing a pulp's ability to repair.
By Dr Jeff Ward BDS, Postgraduate, Endodontics, School of Dental Science, The University of Melbourne, 71 1 Elizabeth Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000.
Vital Pulp Therapy In Cariously
Exposed Permanent Teeth And Its Limitations Abstract permanent teeth, pulpectomy and obturation of the root canal system is usually the treatment of choice. Vital pulp therapy for cariously exposed permanent In young permanent teeth, pulpotomy is classically undertaken teeth remains one of the most controversial areas in to promote apexogenesis (5). Apexogenesis refers to a vital pulp dentistry. Because a vital, functioning pulp is capable therapy procedure performed to encourage physiological develop- of initiating several defence mechanisms to protect ment and formation of the root end (6). The objective is to pro- the body from bacterial invasion, it is beneficial to mote root development and apical closure. An open, divergent preserve the vitality and health of an exposed pulp apex presents the challenge of producing an apical stop or rather than replace it with a root filling material constriction for placement of a hermetically sealed root canal filling (6). Because the pulp is necessary for the formation of dentine, the following pulp exposure. There is no consensus on loss of vitality in young permanent teeth before completion of root the survival rate of formerly cariously exposed pulps. formation leaves a thin, weak root that is prone to fracture and Observation time, judgement criteria, difficult to treat endodontically (7). The prognosis for permanent pulpotomy/pulp capping technique and, most retention is limited when compared with fully developed teeth. importantly, pulpal status at the time of treatment, Every effort must be made to maintain the vitality of the pulp in vary to a great extent amongst studies. teeth with incomplete apices to achieve root development. Once In mature teeth, a pulp exposed by caries is usually root development is achieved and apices have closed, root canal treatment is completed. The need for root canal treatment was removed and the root canals are cleaned, shaped and based on the premise that possible necrosis, continued calcification filled. Amongst the methods for preservation of a or internal resorption will occur following pulpotomy. Recent cariously exposed pulp, partial pulpotomy has yielded studies have proposed that as long as a hermetic seal is ensured, a markedly high success rate in young teeth. Major root canal treatment is not needed following pulpotomy (8). limitations in the success of vital pulp therapy in Partial pulpotomy aimed at preserving pulpal vitality has been cariously exposed permanent teeth exist. The lack of shown to be successful in traumatically exposed permanent teeth predictability and long-term success greatly influence (9). This treatment regimen has been applied and showed some decision-making. The decision-making itself is success in the treatment of cariously exposed young permanent unreliable primarily due to the difficulty of accurately molars ( 10, I I ). The excellent blood supply of a young permanent diagnosing the ability of the pulp to repair. tooth with incompletely formed roots may contribute towards this success (7). In contrast, the decreased resistance of the aged pulp While there are indications for vital pulp therapy in may become significant when one considers that the vascular young permanent molars, it must be remembered reaction to inflammation is considered a protective mechanism of that ultimately, none of these procedures enjoy the the pulp against invading factors ( 12). From the clinical point of view, long-term success of complete root canal therapy. the vitality of the dental pulp of an aged person appears to be weaker than that of a young person ( I 2). Considerable literature emphasises the negative aspects of vital Introduction pulp therapy and discourages its practice. Many clinicians and The treatment of the cariously exposed permanent tooth should researchers continue to condemn vital pulp therapy for the same result in arrestingthe carious process and keepingthe vital pulp free reasons reported in the literature 80 years ago, despite the of inflammation ( I ) The aim of vital pulp therapy is to preserve the advances made in pulp biology ( I 3). vitality and function of the coronal or remaining radicular pulp tissue The immediate and long-term success of root canal therapy is (2) Carious lesions involving the pulp, if not treated will lead to well known, but clinicians are less certain of the success of vital pulp pulpal necrosis and often involvement of the periradicular tissues, therapy. Cvek ( 9 ) reported a 96% success rate for partial with pain and discomfort for the patient (3) The treatment of the pulpotomy in traumatically fractured teeth with an open apex that cariously exposed pulp is dependent upon the maturity of the were healthy before trauma. Barthel et al (14) in comparison, tooth In deciduous teeth, treatment is aimed at removing the found a success rate of only 13% ten years after capping cariously infected, coronal pulp and fixing or mummifying the radicular pulpal exposed, asymptomatic, vital pulps. Whilst observation time, tissue, thereby preserving the tooth, not the pulp (4) In mature pulpotomy technique and judgement criteria vary between studies,
AUSTMLIAN ENDODONTIC JOURNALVOLUME 28 No. I APRIL 2002 29