Teeth Its: Vital Pulp Therapy Cariously Exposed Permanent and Limitations
Teeth Its: Vital Pulp Therapy Cariously Exposed Permanent and Limitations
Teeth Its: Vital Pulp Therapy Cariously Exposed Permanent and Limitations
By Dr Jeff Ward BDS, Postgraduate, Endodontics, School of Dental Science, The University of
Melbourne, 71 1 Elizabeth Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000.
Bacterial Contamination
References
Bacterial contamination is the main factor that determines the I . Koncke A. Treatment of deep carious lesions. Int Dent J 1970;
prognosis of vital pulp therapy (26). Bacterial contamination of 20: 338-43.
the pulp can occur directly through caries or through exposure to 2. @o$kan M.K. Pulpotomy of carious vital teeth with periapical
salivary contamination. Following caries removal and the aseptic involvemet. Int Endod J 1995; 28: 172-6.
removal of superficial pulp, it is important to control bacterial 3. Nosrat I.V. Nosrat C.A. Reparative hard tissue formation
contamination of the pulp by microleakage at the tooth restoration following calcium hydroxide application after partial pulpotomy
interface (8 I). Cox et al (62) showed that three weeks after res- in cariously exposed pulps of permanent teeth. Int Endod J
torations were placed over a pulp exposure, pulpal reorganisation 1998; 3 I : 22 1-6.
I 0 years: a retrospective study. J Endod 2000; 26: 525-8. be done? Is it worth it?Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989;
15. Cameron A.C., Widrner R.P A Handbook of paediatric dentistry. 68: 628-39.
Westmead Hospital, Sydney, 1996; pp. 65-76. 37. Strindberg L.Z. The dependence of the results of pulp therapy
16. Kakehashi S.,Stanley H.R., Fitzgerald R.L. The effects of surgical on certain factors. An analytical study based on radiographic
exposures of dental pulps in germ-free and conventional and clinical follow-up examinations.Acta Odontol Scand 1956;
laboratory rats. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1965; 20: 14: I75 Suppl 21.
340-9. 38. Matsuo T , Nakanishi T , Shimizu H., Ebisu 8.A clinical study of
17. 0ntavik D., fitt Ford TR. Essential endodontology: prevention direct pulp capping applied to carious-exposed pulps. J Endod
and treatment of apical periodontitis. Blackwell Science, 1996; 22: 55 1-6.
Oxford, 1998; pp. 192-2 10. 39. Langeland K. Tissue response to dental caries. Endod Dent
18. Heys D.R., Fitzgerald R.J., Cox C.F, Avery / . K . The inherent Traumatol 1987; 3: 149-7 I .
healing capacity of the dental pulp. J Dent Res 1985; 64: 22 I . 40. Reeves R . . Stanley H.R. The relationship of bacterial
19. Walton R.E., Torabinepd M . Principles and practice of penetration and pulpal pathosis in carious teeth. Oral Surg
endodontics. W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, 1989; Oral Med Oral Pathol 1966; 22: 59-65.
pp. 353-70. 41. Longeland K., Longeland L.K. Indirect capping and the
20. Seltzer S.,Bender I . b , Ziontz M . The dynamics of pulpal treatment of deep carious lesions. Int Dent J 1968; 18:
inflammation: correlations between diagnostic data and actual 326-80.
histologic findings in the pulp. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 42. Trowbridge H.O. Pathogenesis of pulpitis resulting from dental
1963; 16: 846-7 I , caries. J Endod I98 I ; 7: 52-60.
2I . Waterhouse g., Numm J.H.. Whitworth J.M., Soames / . V . 43. Lin L., Langeland K. Light and electron microscopic study of
Primary molar pulp therapy - histological evaluation of failure. teeth with carious pulp exposures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
Int J Paed Dent 2000; 10: 3 13-2 I . Pathol I98 I ; 5 I : 292-3 16.
22. Cohen S.,Burns R.C. Pathways of the pulp. Mosby Year Book, 44. Gruythuysen R.J., Weerheijm K.L. Calcium hydroxide
6th ed., St Louis, 1994; pp. 682-7 19. pulpotomy with a light-cured cavity-sealing material after two
23. Dannenberg J.L. Pedodontic-endodontics. Dent Clin North years. J Dent Child 1997; 64: 25 1-53,
Am 1974; 18: 367-77. 45. Hosseini A.A. A clinical evaluation of root resorption by
24. Fairbourn D.R., Charbeneau G.1, Loesche W / . Effect of formocresol treatment in 120 cases of pulpotomy in
improved Dycal and I.R.M. on bacteria in deep carious lesions. permanent molars. J Clin Paed Dent 1992; 17: I I - 13.
J Am Dent Assoc 1980; 100: 547-52. 46. Teplitsky FIE. Formocresol pulpotomies on posterior per-
25. Ninchl R E , Avery D.R. Evaluation of new pulp capping agent in manent teeth. J Can Dent Assoc 1984; 50: 623-7.
indirect pulp therapy. J Dent Child 1983; 50: 25-30. 47. Willard R.M. Radiographic changes following formocresol
26. Lim K.C., ffirk E.E.J. Direct pulp capping: a review. Endod Dent pulpotomy in primary molars. J Dent Child 1976; 43: 4 14-6.
Traumatol 1987; 3: 2 13-9. 48. Fuks A.B., Bimstein E. Clinical evaluation of diluted formocresol
27. Baume L.J. Dental pulp conditions in relation to carious lesions. pulpotomies in primary teeth of school children. Paed Dent
Int Dent J 1970; 20: 309-37. 1981; 3: 321-4.