Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 31 views

    MRR 3

    Uploaded by

    errolcostales1590
    The document discusses political self-deception and how it relates to political leaders and judgment. It explores how the reader's views changed from thinking political self-deception only affected individuals to understanding it can influence broader political decisions and morality. The document also presents ideas on how political judgment considers various conditions and perspectives to solve issues.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    MRR 3

    Uploaded by

    errolcostales1590
    31 views2 pages
    The document discusses political self-deception and how it relates to political leaders and judgment. It explores how the reader's views changed from thinking political self-deception only affected individuals to understanding it can influence broader political decisions and morality. The document also presents ideas on how political judgment considers various conditions and perspectives to solve issues.

    Original Title

    mrr3

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document discusses political self-deception and how it relates to political leaders and judgment. It explores how the reader's views changed from thinking political self-deception only affected individuals to understanding it can influence broader political decisions and morality. The document also presents ideas on how political judgment considers various conditions and perspectives to solve issues.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    31 views2 pages

    MRR 3

    Uploaded by

    errolcostales1590
    The document discusses political self-deception and how it relates to political leaders and judgment. It explores how the reader's views changed from thinking political self-deception only affected individuals to understanding it can influence broader political decisions and morality. The document also presents ideas on how political judgment considers various conditions and perspectives to solve issues.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Errol M.

    Costales
    GED101

    MRR3
    What is political about political self-deception?

    1. What are the three (3) things that you significantly learned from the reading? Please start by
    saying ' Before reading the article, I used to think that (insert thought). After reading the article,
    I now think that (insert thought)'.

    Before reading the article, I used to think that Political Self-Deception was just a personal
    deception regarding the political aspect of the article community. After reading the article, I now
    think that it concentrates more on the political leader than the broader audience. The argument
    made in this article is that political self-deception can be identified by how political morality and
    decisions are manifested as well as evaluated.

    Before reading the article, I used to think that political judgment had an impact on one's political
    aspirations. After reading the article, I now think that Political Judgment offers the solution to
    the conundrum of what to do. The first fundamental idea presented in this article is a
    generalization of the concept that political judgment considers the conditions and variables that
    surround an issue.

    Before reading the article, I used to think that in the Political World, leaders are responsible for
    being intelligent officers who make decisions for the general public. After reading the article, I
    now think that it is understandable to have reasons to doubt the advice of the intelligence
    officers and assess the decision-makers choice in order to obtain an understanding of political
    self-deception. This is something that I should have thought about before reading the article.

    2. What three (3) things about the reading are unclear to you?

     When it comes to politics, there are no institutional penalties or evaluations for political self-
    deception.

     From a realist's perspective, institutional constraints are widely understood but rarely, if
    ever, implemented or acted upon in the modern era.
     Even though the modern era offers explanations and evaluations of the viewpoints held
    by realists and leaders in moral education, politicians continue to be unaffected by these
    teachings despite their availability.

    3. What three (3) questions that you want to ask about the reading?

     To begin, which tangible and points of view should the general people incorporate into
    their political opinions? Since moral education for leaders and realism have pros and
    cons, it is important to consider both perspectives.

     The second question is this: where will the road leading to political self-deception arrive
    soon? What kind of an effect would it have on the lives of those at the very top?

     And finally, what steps can the general public take to lessen the impact of political self-
    deception and poor judgment?

    You might also like