AMO Model, Hofstede, Cultural Shock Cycle, HPWS
AMO Model, Hofstede, Cultural Shock Cycle, HPWS
AMO Model, Hofstede, Cultural Shock Cycle, HPWS
Name:
Student ID:
1
Table of Contents
Question 2. Total Reward...........................................................................................................3
References................................................................................................................................12
2
Question 2. Total Reward
The total reward approach can be beneficial for CregTech to motivate employees, pool
talented candidates in the workforce, and retain employees for a long time in the
organization. Especially, when it is facing issues to attract young Ph.D. students who like to
work in vibrant and cosmopolitan cities for better opportunities. Now, the total reward system
can help the company to create job opportunities through learning and training for the youths.
The key benefit of the concept is to design a suitable reward program that supports the
distinct needs of the employees (Kaur et al., 2019). According to the case study, the current
employee turnover rate is 5% for the company. This seemed to be low but actually, it is
concerning as the company is in its initial stage and operating with only fifty employees.
Moreover, it must lower its employee turnover as the number of employees will increase in
the future. This issue could be solved with the help of the total reward approach. For
additional benefits, this approach could be added to the employee value proposition of the
company to retain and attract individuals (Mascarenhas, 2019). However, the benefits of this
system can only be enjoyed when both the financial and non-financial needs of the employees
are addressed. For example, monetary payments, and benefits can be considered financial
rewards. On the other hand, non-financial rewards include career growth opportunities and a
positive working environment (Madhani, 2017).
Rewards
Financial Non-Financial
Career
Variable Pay PMI Job design
planning
There are high chances of failure of international assignments especially when the
responsibilities are on the employees of a local organization like CregTech. Some of the key
reasons are lack of knowledge of different cultures and business processes in an international
environment (Suutari et al., 2018). There are many other reasons for the failure of an
5
international assignment. For example, the selection of the wrong person in the first place has
ensured failure in the first place. On the other hand, if the meeting of the international
assignment is held in the location of another company, then lack of knowledge of local
culture and support from the locals can be big issues. This is because; the research manager
send to another country and the company is unaware of the changing business conditions
(Rantakeisu, 2015). International assignments between companies from different nations
might also be failed due to the different weightage of cultural dimensions in the countries. In
the study by Cole and Nesbeth (2014), most of the respondents stated that cross-cultural
issues, lack of preparation for the assignment, and lack of organizational support were the key
reasons behind the failure of international assignments. For organizational support, an expat
in the host country must keep continuous communication with their home country and
colleagues. Communication is also required to support family and not led by domestic issues
that will bring the end of the international assignment without success. An isolated expat is
more likely to reject the assignment quickly. In this case, long-term international assignments
are more likely to be failed than short-term international assignments. The probability of
underperformance of the ex-pat in international assignment increases with the period the
expat needs to spend in the host country (Kumarika Perera et al., 2017). Moreover, the
organization might fail to meet the psychological needs of the employees. Though, this could
be done by both the host and parent organization. In both cases, the lack of perceived support
has impacted the working engagement, commitment, and performance of the employees
negatively. Job dissatisfaction due to this also led to turnover intention and obvious failure of
the assignment. At last, it is difficult to comply with the laws of the host country which might
lead to project delay, cost overrun, and failure of the assignment. Most employment laws in
the host country have created most of the problems (Burgess, 2018).
One of the positive points for CregTech to do business with Kodeshi is the similar business
profile of both companies. That means, the organizations can understand the business
operations of each other. Still, they did not encounter one another in the past. Which
CregTech must ensure that the research manager must know Koeshi's business operations and
Japanese culture as well. For this, the application of Hofstede's cultural dimensions is
recommended to the company. CregTech is from the UK though, cultural changes occurred
as BVCC is from the USA. Thus, the differences in the cultural dimensions between the UK,
the USA, and Japan are shown below.
6
Figure 4: Cultural differences between the UK, the USA, and Japan
(Hofstede-Insight, 2022)
The image showed the cultural differences between the UK and Japan are more than that
between the USA and the UK. Hence, the differences between Japan and the UK are more
convenient even though Japan is the host company and the UK is the parent company in this
case. For example, Japan is a high uncertainty-avoiding nation in the world though, the
British people like to deal with uncertainties in their life. That is why; the Research Manager
from CregTech must be punctual at meetings and plan the presentations before meeting as the
Japanese hate late comers and surprises. Similarly, the personal and emotional issues of the
Japanese must be treated with respect else it could lead to dissatisfaction with the host
company. For this expat training to the Research Manager is recommended to CregTech. For
the training, the company can use a multidimensional model for the success of the expatriate.
This model includes contextual performance, retention, and relationship building (DeNisi and
Sonesh, 2016). That means it could not result in the turnover intention of the Research
Manager. On the other hand, the cultural shock model is recommended for the Research
Manager so the manager can deal with long-term living in the host country without any issues
of communication with the parent company and domestic difficulties. The cultural shock
model will help to deal with the psychological issues in Japan. According to this model, the
first six months will spend happily but adjustments are required after six months to master the
time issue.
7
Figure 5: Cultural shock model
(Source: Mansor et al., 2013)
Thus, knowledge of Japanese culture and training to deal with the issue including language
training are required for both the company and the Research Manager.
AMO theory where AMO stands for ability, motivation, and opportunity which are used to
enhance the performance of employees. However, the application and outcomes of AMO
theory depend on the team size (Dasí et al., 2021). Hence, the application of AMO theory in
CregTech with 50 employees at present and 150 employees in the future will be different.
Moreover, the application of this theory must include the five expectations from BVCC. This
is because; the expectations will help to motivate employees and improve their performance
as well. Development of leadership team, succession plan, talent acquisition, continuous
development, and performance-drive culture are demanded by BVCC. Bailey who developed
the model has identified three elements for enhancing employee performance which are
appropriate motivation, required skills, and participating opportunity. The company must
develop a human resource department effectively which focused on creating a sustainable
working environment for the employees as the first step of applying the AMO model (Pak et
al., 2019). Now, sustainable business strategies cannot be created with the help of traditional
human resource management only. For this, CregTech needs to apply Green Human
Resource Management strategies or GHRM (Yu et al., 2020). Although, the AMO model was
very old and it is improved at present and it is called a high-performance work system
(HPWS). Hence, CregTech must focus on developing HPWS in the organization to gain the
most from the AMO model. For this, the organization needs to incorporate high involvement
8
working programs or HIWP for its employees. The recommended design of HIWP as per the
AMO model is given below.
Opportunities or
Abilities or Skills Motivation
empowerments
9
Figure 7: Functional Group for group payment
(Source: Created by Researcher)
However, to implement AMO successfully, the company needs to create another functional
group of HR management. This could be done with the employees from business
development and senior management. Though, new recruitment is needed for these functions
so far.
However, the creation of the self-directed working team is also pointed to as the succession
plan for leadership in the organization. However, only human resource strategies are not
enough to motivate employees and create opportunities for them. This is because the
company needs to implement HPWS to gain most of the benefits from the AMO model.
Besides Human Resource activities, the company also needs to involve employees in
organizational decision-making and get feedback from them. In this way, the employee will
participate in decision-making activities and develop a strong sense of engagement (Raby,
2017). Similarly, commitment from the employees is required apart from rewarding them.
The success of the AMO model relies on these factors as given below.
10
Involvement and
participation
Reward and
Human Resources
Commitment
11
References
12
Mahmudi, B. and Elmi, F., 2020. Effect of Leader Member Exchange, Organizational Culture
and Employee Engagement on Organizational Citizenship Behavior (Case Study Gen Y In
Perum Lppnpi). Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting, 1(1),
pp.71-82.
Mansor, M., Hamid, N., Kamil, S. and Abu, N., 2013. The determinant factors of expatriate
manager failure in the international assignment. In International Conference on Business
Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Engineering 2013, 574 (Vol. 581).
Mascarenhas, B.G., 2019. Employer branding, employee value proposition, and employee
experience: New approaches for people management in organizations. In Strategic Employee
Communication (pp. 97-103). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Pak, K., Kooij, D.T., De Lange, A.H. and Van Veldhoven, M.J., 2019. Human Resource
Management and the ability, motivation and opportunity to continue working: A review of
quantitative studies. Human Resource Management Review, 29(3), pp.336-352.
Raby, S., 2017. What Drives SME Growth? Introducing the Leader's Growth Mindset. Bissett
School of Business, Mount Royal University. (pp. 47). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Rantakeisu, H., 2015, These are the 5 main reasons why international assignments fail.
Available at: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/5-main-reasons-why-international-
assignments-fail-h%C3%A5kan-rantakeisu/ [Accessed on 4th July 2022]
Ray, V., 2019. A theory of racialized organizations. American Sociological Review, 84(1),
pp.26-53.
Suutari, V., Brewster, C., Mäkelä, L., Dickmann, M. and Tornikoski, C., 2018. The effect of
international work experience on the career success of expatriates: A comparison of assigned
and self‐initiated expatriates. Human Resource Management, 57(1), pp.37-54.
Verma, L., 2019, Total Rewards – the challenges and a winning strategy. Available at:
https://sightsinplus.com/insight/benifits/total-rewards-the-challenges-and-a-winning-strategy/
[Accessed on 1st July 2022]
Wamweru, T.J. and Makokha, S., 2018. Relationship between total reward management
systems and employee engagement: a case study of Bamburi cement limited, Kenya. Journal
of Human Resource and Leadership, 3(1), pp.29-51.
Werner, S. and Balkin, D.B., 2021. Strategic benefits: How employee benefits can create a
sustainable competitive edge. The Journal of Total Rewards, 31(1), pp.8-22.
Yu, W., Chavez, R., Feng, M., Wong, C.Y. and Fynes, B., 2020. Green human resource
management and environmental cooperation: An ability-motivation-opportunity and
contingency perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 219, pp.224-235.
13