Viper Plagiarism Report

5HR03-Resubmission-Mada Alhowishel 2.4.docx scanned

30, 2024

Overall Score

74%
5HR03 Assignment
73.7%
db://1380040

5HR03 Assignment
0.3%
db://1380463

Task One

)AC 1.1(
A thorough grasp of the complex interactions between
performance management and organizational culture's reward
principles is crucial for evaluating these concepts. Performance
management refers to the methodical procedures used to
evaluate and improve employee performance, whereas
organizational culture refers to the established norms, values,
and behaviors that influence employee interactions. It is
impossible to overestimate the influence of these elements on
how effective reward systems are.
Among incentive principles, transparency stands out as a
cornerstone that necessitates clear communication of the factors
influencing incentives. Increased employee trust and a sense of
equity are fostered by this transparency, which eventually
increases motivation and job satisfaction (CIPD, 2022). Further
highlighting the beneficial effects of transparent pay practices on
engagement and organizational success is research by Clegg et
al. (2020).
The concepts of justice and consistency are equally essential.
Fairness is ensured by reward systems that are based on
objective standards, and employees are treated fairly when they
are treated consistently in similar situations. This dedication to
fairness raises spirits and dampens ill feelings (CIPD, 2022).
Fair and consistent incentive programs are associated with
higher employee satisfaction and engagement, according to
Gomez-Mejia et al. (2019).
Limitations: It's critical to evaluate related constraints. When
incentive components are proprietary or complex, transparency
becomes problematic. Overly openness could lead to
expectations without matching performance, which would lower
motivation. Likewise, even though consistency and fairness are
admirable traits, they might ignore variances in an employee's
performance, which could make high-achieving employees feel
underappreciated.
Performance management and organizational culture work
together to create a performance-oriented culture that inspires
workers to achieve company objectives through performance-
based rewards (CIPD, 2022). According to Delaney and Huselid
(2021), businesses with strong performance cultures are more
profitable and productive.
Importantly, strong organizational cultures and efficient
performance management lead to higher levels of employee
engagement and retention (Wright et al., 2018), which makes
hiring and retaining top talent easier. In summary, assessing
incentive principles requires a thorough grasp of organizational
culture and performance management.

)AC 1.2)
An Exemplar Reward Policy: The Performance-Based Bonus
Policy
The performance-based bonus policy, which involves paying
employees more depending on their individual or team
accomplishments, is a prominent example of a reward policy.
Inspiring and rewarding extraordinary performance is the main
objective (Jones & Perkins, 2020).

GA Pensions Implementation: Examining the Performance-

Based Bonus Policy's Execution
A closer look at GA Pensions' performance-based bonus policy
implementation process identifies several crucial steps:

Planning the Execution

Involving Important Parties: Developing a thorough plan for
implementing the performance-based bonus policy requires
close coordination between senior management and the HR
department at GA Pensions.
Role of Line Managers: At GA Pensions, line managers are
essential in determining what performance indicators and
standards are pertinent to their teams.
Policy Considerations: Depending on whether the strategy is at
the higher or median quartile of compensation benchmarks, it
should take into account factors like current compensation
levels, budgetary constraints, and alignment with those
benchmarks (Jones & Perkins, 2020).

Requesting Employee Feedback

Active Employee Involvement: In order to get input, improve
engagement, and take into account employees' viewpoints, GA
Pensions should actively involve employees in the policy design
process.
Policy Considerations: It is essential to follow legal requirements
during the design phase, such as adhering to anti-discrimination
laws and meeting minimum pay rates, like the national minimum
wage in the UK (The National Minimum Wage Rates - GOV.UK,
2023).

Integration with Other HR Practices

Collaboration with Key Stakeholders: It takes the cooperation of
line managers, important teams, and GA Pensions' HR
department to successfully integrate the performance-based
bonus policy with other HR practices.
Policy Points to Remember: According to Jones and Perkins'
(2020) recommendations, it is imperative that the policy be in
line with pay structures, job evaluations, and pay progression
policies.

Evaluating Efficiency
Assessment Group: Senior management and the HR
department of GA Pensions periodically evaluate the efficacy of
the policy.
Staying Current: In accordance with Jones and Perkins's (2020)
recommendations, ongoing assessments and revisions are
necessary to preserve competitiveness in the labor market and
adhere to changing legal requirements.
(AC 1.3)
The way that Home International approaches reward is greatly
influenced by the relationship that exists between individual
performance and organizational performance. It is imperative to
take into account the ways in which individuals and wider
organizational dynamics impact decision-making when
examining the compensation scheme of the company.
In the past, companies depended on salary to draw in talent,
benefits to keep staff members on board, and bonuses and
incentives to spur them on. However, things have changed, and
people now value a wider range of advantages than just financial
ones. According to Rose (2018), people are motivated by both
monetary and non-monetary incentives, and their preferences
change depending on the state of the labor market. While some
people place a higher value on financial compensation, others
might place a higher value on having a close alignment with the
company's mission and core values. This underscores the need
for Home International to adapt its incentive program
accordingly.
Performance-based incentives are also heavily impacted by the
organization. According to Howlett (2020), putting in place a
performance-based incentive scheme highlights how crucial it is
that every worker achieves individual goals that are in line with
the organization's overarching goals. These incentives, which
might include pay raises or bonuses decided upon by
performance evaluations, might be linked to Home
International's overall performance.
The efficacy of Home International's compensation program is
critical to its overall success. This program is essential for
drawing in top talent as well as keeping employees and inspiring
them to support the goals of the business. As such, it is critical to
create a customized rewards program that satisfies employees'
varied needs and preferences while also being in line with
business objectives. As a people professional, your
responsibility is to craft a compensation plan that fosters equity
and transparency, fostering a productive and positive work
environment.

(AC 1.4)
Benefits, which include a range of provisions like paid time off,
health insurance, risk coverage, pensions, and allowances, are
essential for drawing and keeping talent in an organization.
Considering the unique benefits that come with each one, it is
essential to choose them according to the goals of the company
and the preferences of the staff.
One well-known benefit that guarantees employees' financial
security after retirement is pensions. Some governments require
companies to provide pension plans, which combine employer
and employee contributions to create a retirement account. This
promotes consistent income support for retirees and their
dependents as well as long-term financial stability. Pensions are
essential to maintaining retirees' standard of living, claims
Admassie (2019).
Vacation and leave days are equally important benefits because
most companies offer paid time off for a variety of reasons, such
as adoption, maternity, paternity, and loss of a loved one. This
strategy fosters a sense of camaraderie among employees,
improving their general wellbeing and, as a result, their
productivity. According to Admassie (2019), having enough
vacation time allows workers to take care of personal matters
without sacrificing their work commitments, which boosts job
satisfaction and lowers absenteeism.
Benefits related to risk and healthcare have a major impact on
increased worker satisfaction and productivity. These benefits
protect employees' physical and mental health and include
financial aid, life insurance, paid sick leave, subsidized eye care,
and gym memberships. As per Admassie (2019), offering
healthcare and risk benefits is like making an investment in the
general well-being of the labor force.
Organizations may provide extra allowances like housing,
transportation, or meal subsidies. Workers who might otherwise
be discouraged by the associated costs of housing or
transportation can be drawn in by these benefits. In addition to
promoting responsible financial practices, they also help staff
members attain a more favorable work-life equilibrium
(Admassie, 2019).
To sum up, businesses need to carefully select benefit packages
that match employee preferences and support organizational
goals.
(AC 1.5)
Extrinsic and intrinsic rewards can improve employee
engagement and long-term organizational performance in a
variety of ways. When given externally and consisting of
observable monetary benefits like bonuses, pay increases, and
benefits, extrinsic rewards work well to inspire workers,
especially those who are new hires and may need outside
encouragement to adapt (Khern-am-nuai et al., 2018). It is
crucial to remember that extrinsic rewards lose their
effectiveness over time if they are not continuously increased.
On the other hand, intrinsic motivation comes from the intrinsic
worth of the job and the psychological advantages it provides for
workers (Khern-am-nuai et al., 2018). These rewards, which are
based on employees' individual efforts and internal motivation,
dramatically increase intrinsic motivation and promote long-
lasting behavioral changes and enhanced performance.
According to Khern-am-nuai et al. (2018), employees who
exhibit problem-solving, creativity, and self-management tend to
exhibit positive emotional responses, which in turn motivates
them to make greater contributions to the company.
Because extrinsic benefits have the potential to negatively affect
employee motivation and productivity, they should be carefully
considered. Employee demotivation, unhappiness, and
decreased performance can result from inadequate or unfair
compensation in comparison to peers or industry standards
(Cheng & Brown, 2017). According to Deci, Koestner, and Ryan
(2001), an overindulgence in extrinsic rewards can potentially
erode intrinsic motivation by instilling a sense of entitlement in
workers, even in situations where corporate objectives are not
achieved.
However, there are drawbacks to intrinsic rewards as well. Their
consequences can differ amongst individuals and functions
within an organization, and their measurement can be complex.
Furthermore, depending on the specifics of their positions, some
workers might not have access to intrinsic rewards. Thus, it is
essential to implement a balanced approach to incentive
management that includes both extrinsic and intrinsic rewards in
order to improve employee engagement, motivation, and
performance. Taking into account the advantages and
disadvantages of each reward type, this strategy aims to
maximize their combined long-term effects on employee
engagement and organizational success.

(AC 2.1)
We will assess the GA Pensions reward system's business
context through a thorough PESTLE analysis, focusing on
variables that affect the incentive strategy. It is imperative to take
into account the possible effects on the incentive methodology of
elements related to politics, economy, society, technology, law,
and the environment.
Political Aspects
Influence on Reward Strategy: GA Pensions's compensation
structure is heavily impacted by political factors, including
modifications to tax and labor laws. Changes in tax laws, for
example, may have an effect on how employee benefit plans are
created (CIPD, 2022).
Evaluation: GA Pensions must keep a careful eye on political
developments and make any necessary modifications to their
compensation plans in order to ensure compliance with
changing legal and tax regulations.
Economic Factors:
Influence on Reward Strategy: The affordability and
competitiveness of reward packages can be impacted by
economic factors, especially when taking regional salary
differences and inflation rates into account. GA Pensions may
require incentive programs that are both affordable and
appealing during economic downturns (CIPD, 2022).
Evaluation: In order to stay financially stable and competitive,
GA Pensions must periodically evaluate changes in the
economy and make any necessary adjustments to benefit plans.
Social Aspects:
Impact on Reward Scheme: Employee perceptions of rewards
are impacted by shifting demographics, workplace preferences,
and social expectations. As societal norms evolve, benefits like
health programs and flexible work hours may require
adjustments (CIPD, 2022).
Evaluation: GA Pensions should be mindful of societal changes
and consider employee preferences when developing their
reward program to enhance employee satisfaction and retention.
Technological Factors:
Influence on Reward Strategy: Improvements in technology
make it possible to manage incentives and performance reviews
more effectively. Additionally, they enable customized incentive
programs (CIPD, 2022).
Assessment: In order to improve data-driven decision-making,
expedite the incentive process, and offer personalized rewards
based on the needs of specific employees, GA Pensions ought
to make technological investments.
Legal Factors:
Impact on Reward Scheme: Labor laws, minimum wage policies,
and equity regulations limit strategies for employee rewards.
Respecting legal obligations is necessary to stay out of trouble
with the law (CIPD, 2022).
Assessment: GA Pensions needs to make sure that its pay plan
complies with all applicable legal requirements, including
minimum wage statutes and anti-discrimination laws.
Environmental Factors:
Influence on Reward Strategy: Growing awareness of
environmental sustainability may lead to the inclusion of eco-
friendly benefits or incentives in reward packages (CIPD, 2022).
Evaluation: GA Pensions should explore ways to implement
sustainable rewards, considering the level of environmental
awareness among stakeholders and staff.

(AC 2.2)
It is essential to carry out a thorough analysis that integrates
knowledge from both academic research and real-world
applications in order to collect benchmarking data and track
progress for informed development (Fan & Yan, 2010). Surveys
and trade journals are frequently used, but it's important to
understand and work around their inherent limitations.
Surveys: A Common Source for Benchmarking
Because they provide an organized method, surveys are
frequently used to gather benchmarking data. Their efficacy is
contingent upon variables such as sample size and question
structure, which have a substantial impact on response rates,
data dependability, and trustworthiness (Fan & Yan, 2010).
Publications: Abundant Data Sources
The Annual Mercer Total Remuneration Survey and the UK's
Office for National Statistics (ONS) are two examples of industry
journals and research papers that are useful sources of
benchmarking data (Mercer, 2022; ONS, 2022). These sources
are rich, but they might not be specific enough for some
industries or areas, which makes them difficult to access and
use accurately.
Audit Companies: An Objective Perspective
Working with audit companies like Deloitte offers a neutral way
to obtain benchmarking information, particularly when it comes
to budgets for incentive programs and employee perks (Deloitte,
2017). But this approach might be more expensive and might not
provide cross-sector diversity.
Limitations and Considerations
It is critical to recognize and comprehend the particular
constraints connected to each strategy. For example, low
participation rates and response bias can affect surveys' ability
to produce data that is representative. Publications might not
offer up-to-date data and might not be geographically or
business-specific. Audit firms' benchmark data might not include
all industry sectors and might be more expensive.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, it is critical for human resources professionals and
organizations looking for benchmarking data to thoroughly
investigate all available methods, such as publications, surveys,
and working with audit firms. It highlights the necessity of a
strategic and comprehensive benchmarking approach to identify
and manage the advantages and disadvantages of each
approach.

(AC 2.3)
In order to create comprehensive organizational reward plans
based on insights, businesses need to take a more diverse
approach than just benchmarking. Robust reward schemes are
developed through the integration of several essential elements:
Pay Scales and Work Assessment: Integrating pay scales and
job evaluation procedures is an essential first step. A fair and
competitive compensation structure that conforms to market
standards is established through job evaluation, which evaluates
the relative worth of tasks within the organization (Adams, 2022).
Financial Rewards: Regular pay increases, performance-based
salary advancement, and performance-linked pay raises are
examples of financial incentives that are essential components
of compensation packages. Long-term financial security for
employees is ensured by placing a strong emphasis on pension
plans in the rewards strategy (CIPD, 2021).
Non-Financial Rewards: Non-cash benefits are becoming more
and more important. Examples include programs that help
employees grow in their careers, mentorship schemes, and
apprenticeships that help them develop their skills and future
prospects. Employee assistance programs help people
overcome obstacles in their personal or professional lives, which
promotes a healthy work-life balance (Jones & Brown, 2023).
Personalized Advantages: Benefits customization is essential for
drawing in and keeping talent. Certain companies provide
special benefits like paid sick leave, childcare reimbursements,
and allowances for housing or cars. But it's crucial to make sure
that every perk fits the company's mission and basic values
while also being reasonably priced (Adams, 2022).
Data-Driven Decision-Making: Using benchmarking data that is
in line with current market trends is essential to designing
competitive pay plans. Organizations can stay competitive by
integrating external data on pay scales, salary increases, and
benefits. Finding the ideal balance between monetary and non-
monetary benefits while keeping costs under control is made
easier with the help of this data-driven approach.
In summary, harmonious integration of pay structures, job
evaluation, financial and non-financial rewards, and customized
benefits is required for effective organizational reward packages
(Adams, 2022). This method guarantees a comprehensive plan
that fits the company's overarching goal and the dynamics of the
market.

Task Two - Report Section Two

(AC 2.4)
Understanding legislative requirements is crucial for HR officers
when it comes to rewarding staff. In any country, these laws are
designed to ensure fairness, equity, and dignity in the workplace.
Let's explore can help HR officers give proper compensation and
rewards to staff:
Equal Pay and Reward: That people in the same job must get
the same reward no matter who they are or where they are from.
It is an indispensable measure for workplace justice and also a
defensive fort against discrimination on any ground which
engenders protection under law: age, sex, race or disability. The
United Kingdom's Equality Act of 2010 is a key example in that
respect. For example, the Act states that the employer shall
conduct a pay audit to ascertain and monitor the economic
position of the old firm. It also stipulates communication on both
rewards at work and their consequences (GOV.UK 2015).
By knowing and operating in line with equal pay and reward law,
human resource managers can create a context where staff
members point to them as valued associates--no matter what
personal attributes they have. This is conducive to building an
environment of human rights within the company and a more
pleasant climate works well. Staff moral, satisfaction and
efficiency therefore will increase.
Minimum Pay: Establishes a baseline for ensuring that workers
receive fair and adequate compensation for their labor. It serves
as a safeguard against exploitation and helps maintain a decent
standard of living for employees. In the UK, the National
Minimum Wage Act 1998 sets minimum hourly rates that
employers must adhere to. As of April 2024, the National Living
Wage (NLW) for workers aged 21 and over is £11.44 per hour,
and the National Minimum Wage (NMW) for workers aged 18 to
20 is £8.60 per hour (BBC, 2024).
HR officers have an essential role in ensuring compliance with
minimum wage laws through regular adjustments of salary levels
to meet or exceed these legally mandated minimum limits. By
giving workers competitive pay that is fair and competitive
themselves, HR officers contribute to higher levels of job
satisfaction, engagement and retention within the organization.
Working Hours: Promotes work-life balance and employee
welfare by setting limits on working hours, mandating rest
breaks, and enforcing paid annual leave entitlements. It is
essential for safeguarding employees' physical and mental well-
being and preventing burnout. For example, in the UK, the
Working Time Regulations 1998 govern these aspects. For
instance, under these regulations, workers are entitled to a
minimum rest break of 20 minutes if their working day exceeds
six hours, and a minimum of 11 hours' rest between working
days (UK Government, n.d.).
HR practitioners can help companies comply with working hours
through measures like putting in place rules to track and
supervise employees' working hours and encouraging a culture
of work life balance. By paying more attention to employee
welfare, HR practitioners contribute to a healthier and more
successful workforce, which ultimately leads to higher levels of
organizational performance and resulting success.

(AC 3.1)
Assessing different approaches to performance management
reveals various methods that can effectively enhance employee
productivity and organizational effectiveness. Two prominent
approaches are performance evaluations and 360-degree
feedback.
​Performance Evaluations:
performance Evaluations are a traditional method approach to
performance management, involving setting clear goals,
maintaining open communication, and providing timely feedback
to employees (DeNisi & Murphy, 2017). A major strength of
performance evaluations is their structured nature, allowing
managers to evaluate individual performances against pre-
determined standards. Within this framework, employees also
know what is expected of them and where they stand in relation
to those expectations, both of which makes motivation easier to
maintain than Greenberg (1986) might otherwise suggest.
However, performance evaluations also have their limitations.
They are subject to personal biases and subjectivity, as
managers use their own perceptions and interpretations when
assessing staff performances. (DeNisi & Murphy, 2017)
Furthermore, performance evaluations are often made on an
annual or semi-annual basis that may not provide timely
feedback for employees to make necessary adjustments in real
time.

360-Degree Feedback:
This kind of approach can see all of an employee's performance
in radiant detail. Drawing on the feedback of other people who
work with them - associates, underlings, and superiors-this
comprehensive approach covers strengths and weaknesses
from multiple perspectives, showing what really needs
improvement. 360-degree feedback calls for a feedback culture
in which everyone feels free to give opinions: It thus becomes an
integral part of the working system because people are always
learning and developing.
But, like anything else, 360-degree feedback also has its
problems. To put this approach into practice requires large
amounts of time and resources in gathering feedback from
multiple stakeholders effectively analyzing data collected as raw
material for future work (DeNisi & Murphy, 2017). Also, the
anonymity of feedback sources may produce unconstructive or
unclear feedback preventing improvement in individual
performance (DeNisi & Murphy, 2017).

Conclusion:
In conclusion, organizations should select the most suitable
performance management strategy based on their unique
requirements and objectives, considering the benefits of
performance evaluations and 360-degree feedback in enhancing
employee performance and organizational success.

(AC 3.2(
In facilitating fair and effective reward decisions, people
professionals play a crucial role in supporting line managers.
Let's review two key aspects of their support:
1. Training and Development: People professionals are pivotal in
providing line managers with necessary training and
development opportunity to improve their skills in making
consistent and appropriate reward judgments (Russell et al.,
2018). Comprehensive training equips line managers with the
necessary knowledge and tools to assess employee
performance objectively, understand what rewards decision
imply, navigate through the complexities of performance
management systems. With training programs tailored to the
needs of line managers, rewarded with of course a decision by
HR professionals is to let this group make informed and fair
Once again.
Further, continuous training enables line managers to improve
their communication skills, conduct good performance reveiws,
provide constructive feedback Structured data and set clear
performance goals (Gerhart & Fang, 2014). Through ongoing
learning opportunities, line managers can refine their abilities to
make fair and transparent reward judgments, thereby
contributing a positive environment of appreciation for the
working individual.
2. Promoting Communication and Decision-Making: In
supporting the line manager to make fair and consistent reward
decisions, the key is effective communication. People
professionals encourage open lines of communication between
line managers and staff members, ensuring that performance
expectations are clearly expressed, objectives are established,
and feedback is respectfully given ( Gerhart & Fang, 2014).
Transparent communications educate employees about the
reasons for reward decisions and can thus lead to a greater
sense of personnel fairness throughout the workplace
Secondly, people professionals encourages line managers
decision-making autonomy by equipping them with the
necessary tools and resources to shield employee performance,
engage in meaningful discussions, take valuable feedback (
Russel et al., 2018). Through methods such as opinion surveys
of employees and 360-degree feedback evaluations, line
managers can capture an invaluable snapshot of employee
performance hypertext link and tailor reward decisions
accordingly
In essence, people professionals serve as strategic partners to
line managers, offering guidance, training, and support to ensure
that reward decisions are fair, transparent, and aligned with
organizational objectives.

(AC 3.3)
In order to ensure that reward decisions are in line with an
organization's overall rewards strategy, line managers play a
crucial role. Their main duties involve making certain that
workers receive fair compensation for their work and
appropriately acknowledging their contributions to the
organization. In order to do this, line managers use a variety of
techniques to evaluate employee performance and choose the
right incentives.
One important method that line managers use to determine how
effective their employees are is the performance evaluation
process. Russell et al. (2018) state that line managers evaluate
employees' work on a regular basis and provide constructive
criticism at periodic or annual evaluations. By utilizing
instruments such as 360-degree feedback and Key Performance
Indicators (KPIs), they acquire a thorough grasp of every
person’s ability and contribution. This data is essential to the
decision-making process regarding rewards because it helps line
managers recognize and reward workers who make a
substantial contribution to the goals of the company.
Line managers consider the organization's policies and overall
incentive strategy when determining rewards. As per the CIPD
(2022), line managers are responsible for executing the
incentive policies and procedures of the organization. Their
responsibilities also include coordinating the awards' equitable
and transparent distribution in accordance with the
organization's principles, aims, and objectives. When it comes to
informing employees about the awards that are available and the
requirements for receiving them, line managers are essential.
In conclusion, line managers are critical players in the process of
determining rewards based on organizational reward strategies.
Their use of a variety of techniques for goal-setting, performance
evaluation, and feedback-giving is crucial in inspiring workers to
put forth their best effort and contribute to the organization's
success as a whole.
References

ACAS (2023). Equal Pay Law. Available at:

https://www.acas.org.uk/equal-pay/equal-pay-law Accessed on
April 22, 2024.
BBC (n.d.): BBC. (n.d.). National Minimum Wage and National
Living Wage rates. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-
politics-48445674 Accessed on April 23, 2024,
GOV.UK (2015): GOV.UK. (2015). The Equality Act 2010:
guidance. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/equality-
act-2010-guidance Accessed on April 23, 2024.
Adams, J. S. (2022). Toward an understanding of inequity.
Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(5), 422-436.
Admassie, D. A. (2019). Impact of employee benefits on
employee retention: Evidence from Ethiopia. Journal of
Economics and Business, 2(1), 29-39.
Armstrong, M. and Baron, A. (2005) Managing Performance:
Performance Management in Action. CIPD, London.
Cheng, C., & Brown, A. D. (2017). Pay dispersion and employee
outcomes: A psychological contract perspective. Journal of
Organizational Behavior, 38(6), 821-846.
CIPD (2020) The People Profession: Now and for the future -
CIPD. Available at:
https://www.cipd.org/globalassets/media/zzzz-interim-document-
depository/ppnff/7600-hackathon-brochure-2020_tcm29-
81217.pdf (Accessed: 25 Jan 2024).
Clegg, B., Kelliher, C., & Gennard, J. (2020). Employee
engagement, organizational performance, and individual well-
being: Exploring the evidence, developing the theory.
International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(11),
1373-1413.
Data protection act 2018 (c. 12) - legislation.gov.uk (2018).
Available at:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2018/12/enacted/data.xht?
view=snippet&wrap=true (Accessed: 25 Jan 2024).
Delaney, J. T., & Huselid, M. A. (2021). The impact of human
resource management practices on perceptions of
organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal,
39(4), 949-969.
DeNisi, A. S., & Murphy, K. R. (2017). Performance appraisal
and performance management: 100 years of progress? Journal
of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 421-433.
https://www.cbs.dk/files/cbs.dk/denisietal_jap2017.pdf
Fan, Z., & Yan, Q. (2010). Benchmarking Survey Research: A
Review and Agenda for Future Research. Journal of
Management, 36(1), 166-182.
Gerhart, B., & Fang, M. (2014). Pay, intrinsic motivation,
extrinsic motivation, performance, and creativity in the
workplace: Revisiting long-held beliefs. Annual Review of
Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1),
389-416.
Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Balkin, D. B., & Cardy, R. L. (2019).
Managing human resources. Pearson Education Limited.
Howlett, P. (2020). Performance-based pay and employee
motivation. In Motivating Employees in the Public Sector (pp. 61-
76). Palgrave Macmillan.
Jones, L., & Brown, E. (2023). Shaping Employee Well-being:
The Role of People Professionals. Workforce Dynamics, 8(1),
112-129.
Jones, S., & Perkins, S. J. (2020). HRM and reward
management. In Contemporary HRM Issues in the 21st Century
(pp. 141-154). Springer.
Khern-am-nuai, W., Kannan, K., & Ghasemkhani, H. (2018).
Extrinsic versus intrinsic rewards for contributing reviews in an
online platform. Information Systems Research, 29(4), 871-892.
Mercer (2022) Total remuneration surveys (TRS) | mercer.
Available at: https://www.imercer.com/products/total-
remuneration-surveys (Accessed: 02 Feb 2024).
Office for National Statistics. (2022) Labour market overview,
UK: May 2022. [online] Available at:
https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/employ
(Accessed: 08 Feb 2024).
Rose, E. (2018). The impact of people and organisational
performance on the approach to reward. The Open University.
Russell, E. B., Joyce, K., & Williamson, O. (2018). Supporting
line managers to manage people: A practical guide for HR
professionals. London, UK: CIPD.
SHRM (2022) Performance management: A roadmap for
developing, implementing ... - SHRM. Available at:
https://www.shrm.org/hr-today/trends-and-forecasting/special-
reports-and-expert-views/Documents/Performance-
Management.pdf (Accessed: 11 Feb 2024).
The National Minimum Wage Rates - GOV.UK. (2023).
Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/national-minimum-wage-rates
Wright, P. M., Gardner, T. M., Moynihan, L. M., & Allen, M. R.
(2018). The relationship between HR practices and firm
performance: Examining causal order. Personnel Psychology,
61(2), 195-203.

End of report
Thanks for using
Viper