IJERT A Review On Solar Photovoltaic Pow
IJERT A Review On Solar Photovoltaic Pow
IJERT A Review On Solar Photovoltaic Pow
iii. Summarization of performance assessment and are not extracted from the earth layers and do not return
optimization methods of SPVWPS. any harmful pollutant to the surroundings(Chandel et
al.,2015)(Sharma et al., 2019).SPVWPSs consist of solar
2. STUDIES ON SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC WATER photovoltaic panels, a motor and a pump, which is depicted
PUMPING SYSTEMS in figure 1.
The photovoltaic power generation systems have invariable
nature. They did not produce any harmful by-product. They
Figure1. Schematic diagram of a generalized solar powered water pumping system(Aliyu et al., 2018).
Depending on the system design, it requires storage and off sunshine hours. The addition of a water storage
batteries and a charge regulator, the current output of the tank in SPVWPS is more economical than battery storage
system. If the motor uses AC, it is necessary to install a DC backup. The use of solar photovoltaic energy is considered
to AC converter. Battery-less SPVWPS are low-cost, to be a primary resource for the countries located in
which requires less maintenance compared to battery tropical regions, where direct solar radiation may reach
powered systems. However, the storage batteries have the upto1000W/m2(Gopal et al., 2013).
advantage of providing consistent performance during lean
A brief discussion no the studies reported with the this subsection. The components used in SPVWPS should
performance, the types of motors and pumps, the optimal conform to the national/international specifications,
sizing of the photovoltaic panels, the cooling of the solar whichever is applicable in a country.
photovoltaic panels, the control of SPWPS, economic and
environmental considerations are discussed in
Direct coupled DC solar pumping was first introduced in applications. Direct coupled DC solar pumps are simple
the field in the late 1970s. Earlier PV water pumping and reliable but cannot operate at maximum power point of
systems have limitations of overall performance of the PV generator as the solar radiation varies during the day
system due to lack of proper design. Since then, from morning till evening.However, adding maximum
manufacturers have refined their products to improve the power point tracker(MPPT) andcontrols/protections
performance and reliability. The steady fall in prices of PV improve the performance of a PV pump(Chandel et al.,
panels have resulted in making solar pumping 2015)(Muhsen et al., 2017).
economically viable for an increasingly wide range of
Table 3.Comparison between water pumping systems powered by PV and diesel generator.
PVPS Pumping system based on DG
High initial cost Moderate initial cost
Low maintenance and operation cost High maintenance and operation cost
Low environmental pollution High environmental pollution
Low life cycle cost in remote areas High life cycle cost
Does not require fuel Required fuel continuously
Does not require frequent site visits Required frequent site visits
Rapid installation and movable technology Rapid installation and movable technology
strongly depends upon the configuration of PV array.
2.1 Photovoltaic array Photovoltaic configuration refers to the series-parallel
PV technology is used for generating electricity from the arrangement of PV modules in the collector array. Several
incoming solar radiation. Numerous attempts have been PV modules can be connected in series whereas several
made to evaluate, monitor and improve the performance of series modules can be connected in parallel to achieve the
different components of a PV systems: a PV desired current and voltage from the array(Aliyu et al.,
module(Shinde & Wandre, 2015).The source of electrical 2018).The design of the PV array depends upon the desired
energy of the SPVWPSs is the PV arrays(Errouha et al., power supply to the pump and energy losses. It may be
2020). The maximum power point (MPP) depends on designed in such a way that it could provide the required
several factors including on site solar radiation, power to the pump in every hour of the day. If the regulator
temperature, and the connected load if the load is directly and batteries are also used, the PV array sizing will be
connected(Zaghba et al., 2017). For the same amount of larger. Further the addition of an inverter to run an AC
power, array size depends on the efficiency of the cell. motor would also increase the demand of power. A
Solar cells could be divided into three categories according tracking system may also be used in connection with PV
to the type of crystal: mono-crystalline, polycrystalline and array to optimize the system performance. The whole
amorphous. The level of efficiencies in production is about system is assembled on a moving framework which
7%, 15%, and 17% for amorphous, polycrystalline, and follows the sun path or aimed at the brightest area of the
mono-crystalline silicon, respectively(Li et al., 2017).The sky during partly cloudy weather(Li et al., 2017).
performance of solar PV powered water pumping systems
2.2 Power control system and load matching(Muhsen et al., 2017)(Poompavai &
In general, it is important to control SPVWPS optimally so Kowsalya, 2020).
as to achieve optimal operation of the system and Maximum power point tracking(MPPT) controllers can
consequently reliable system.It consists of charge track maximum possible power from the Photovoltaic
controller, energy storage unit, inverter, etc. The charge panel array. Inverterconverts the direct current of PV
controller is used to charge batteries from solar panels. system into alternating current whichenables the use of AC
They prevent the battery to be over charged and stops operated instruments. Apart from these, fewsimple
charging process when battery is fully charged. In large interconnections are also used like switches, cables,
scale PV panel systems, advanced charge controllers are connectors (Nyein & Ya, 2019).The MPPT algorithms can
used. They give complete statistics of volt and ampere be classified into conventional(normally effective in the
while charging battery. They automatically disconnect the case of not having any shading objectives) algorithms and
battery when it is going to be empty. Many control algorithms that are based on stochastic and Artificial
approaches have been developed by researchers intelligence (AI) techniques(Chand & Kalamkar,
toefficiently operate SPVWPS.These approaches include 2016)(Terki et al., 2012).
MPPT algorithms, voltage regulation, frequency control
In (Muhsen et al., 2017) an electronic circuit is used to drive a volumetric/centrifugal pump which is directly
produce a fixed duty cycle ratio for the step-up converter to coupled with a photovoltaic is demonstrated by
enable the PV array to operate at MPP regardless of solar comparinginstantaneous conductance characteristics of PV
radiation variations. The quality of matching DC motor array and motor-pump(Elia et al., 2014).
2.3 Motors and pumps alternative than a DC motor for low power direct coupled
The studies reported on different types of motors and PV water pumping systems. This type of motor is small in
pumps used in SPWPSs are discussed in this section. size and rugged as compared to an AC motor. The cost and
2.3.1 Motors for PV based pumps maintenance problems of DC motors have resulted in the
Several types of DC motors (i.e., brushed and brushless use of induction motors (IM) which require an inverter to
permanent magnet, variable switch reluctance) and AC be used between PV array and the motor. PV pumping
motors (synchronous and a synchronous) are available for system based on induction motor is rugged, reliable and
SPWPSs(Short & Oldach, 2015).The selection maintenance free with increased efficiency and provides
ofthemotorisdependentonthesize,the efficiency more possibilities
requirements,theprice,thereliabilityandtheavailability. DC forcontrolstrategiesincomparisontoDCmotors(Chandel et
motorsareattractivebecausetheycandirectlyconnecttothephot al., 2015)(Poompavai & Kowsalya, 2020).
ovoltaicarray.PV modules produce direct current so DC The studyon performance characteristics of a brushless
motors are most commonly used in a low power solar asynchronous reluctance motor run by a PV generator
water pumping system(S. Kumar et al., 2020). Solar pump under different insolation levels and proposed a control
systems below 5kW generally use DC motors. These strategy to maintain the motor voltage within a permissible
motors are of two types: DC motor with brushes and range and PV array to operate as close to the maximum
without brushes. DC motor with brushes requires frequent power point (MPP).They have found that using this type of
maintenance due to commutator and sliding brush contacts motor leads to improvement in the performance of PV
especially in submersible applications where the pump has pumping system(Micheli et al.,2013)(Meunier et al.,
to be removed frequently from the water well for replacing 2019).Table 5below consolidates the study investigations
brushes(Periasamy et al., 2015). reported on different types of motors used in SPWPSs.
A permanent magnet synchronous (PMSM) brushless DC
motor coupled to a centrifugal pump is found to be a better
(Poompavai & Kowsalya, 2019) Asynchronous AC motor and Brushless DC SPVWPS using brushless DC motor was superior and
motor more efficient than the system using conventional ASM.
(Elia et al., 2014) Permanent Magnet Brushless Cost of drive system to drive SPV pump has reduced
DC(PMBLDC) using PMBLDC. Efficiency of SPVWPS was more
even at low value of solar radiation.
(Errouha et al., 2020) Permanent magnet DC induction motor and Pumping system using permanent magnet DC(PMDC)
AC induction motor. motor had more efficiency than system usinginduction
motor(IM).
(Hamidat & Benyoucef, 2009)and ASM The SPVWPS using asynchronous motor found suitable
(Koreboina et al., 2016) to fulfill drinking water demand and irrigation water
requirement of small crops in Sahara region.
(Periasamy et al., 2015) DC motor and induction motor. Induction motor gave more mechanical power by
drawing more power from PV array and hence efficient
compare to DC motor
(Ebaid et al., 2013) Induction motor Overall efficiency of SPVWPS found to increase more
than 3% by using induction motor
(V. Kumar & Hundal, 2019) Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor ASM machine drive and speed controller had shown
(PMSM) and ASM good transient and steady state performance.
2.3.2 Solar water pump flow, and power to the pump. For design purposes pressure
Solar water pumping is based on PV technology that can be regarded as the work done by a pump to lift a
converts sunlight into electricity to pump water. The PV certain amount of water up to the storage tank. The
panels are connected to a motor (DC or AC) which elevation difference between the water source and storage
converts electrical energy supplied by the PV panel into tank determines the work, a pump has to do. The water
mechanical energy which is converted to hydraulic energy pump will draw a certain power which a PV array needs to
by the pump.The capacity of a solar pumping system to supply(Chand & Kalamkar, 2016).
pump water is a function of three main variables: pressure,
Table 7. Summary of reported investigation on performance assessment of solar pump with different ratings of PV panel.
Authors Aim of the study Outcome
(Sontake et al., 2020) Development of algorithm showing the relation Using this algorithm 22%, cost-saving of
between balancing parameter, array size and battery SAPS has been reported
size
(Abdolzadeh & Ameri, 2009) Investigation of the effect of water spraying over Overall efficiency of SPVWPS is improved
Solar PV panel on the performance of SPVWPS.
(Elrefai & Hamdy, 2016) Study to assess the energy losses due to mismatching Because of losses actual work from PV array is
between the PV array and the pump motor. 84% of the work potential available from PV
array.
(Hassan & Kamran, 2018) TRNSYS based simulation model to investigate Selection of optimum array size ensures better
SPVWPS performance under different operating efficiency and economy of SPVWPS.
conditions and PV array size.
(Kordzadeh, 2010) Investigation of the effect of cooling solar PV panel Daily volume of water and pumping head has
by a thin film of water. been stated to increase.
(Phiri et al., 2020) Design procedure to estimate most optimum size of Procedure can be adopted for drip irrigation
solar panels required to power a water pumping system for any crop in any county's
system for the drip irrigation system of an Olive tree geographical location, provided soil
characteristics and specific crop parameters are
well known.
(Bakelli et al., 2011) Investigation of effect of solar radiation correction to Significant difference was reported in the solar
the PV array sizing and power output. PVarray system sizing withmeasured data and
most appropriate correction to the solar
radiation.
2.4 Optimization of overall solar PV water pumping different PV array orientations. The system is found to be
system capableof pumping 24.06 l/day, 21.47 l/day and 12.12 l/day
The efficiency of solar PV panel is usually very low (10- in summersolstice, equinoxes and winter clear sky days
18%), hence the PV power should be utilized very respectively. Thecalculated PV array efficiency ranges
efficiently.This can be achieved by selecting each from 13.86% in winters to13.91% in summers.
component of SPVWPS with optimum operating (Bora et al., 2017)analyzed the performance of a solar
parameters.Investigations are discussed in subsequent waterpumping system consisting of a PV array, sun-
paragraphs. tracker, apermanent-magnet (PM) DC motor, a helical rotor
(Mazouz & Midoun, 2011)investigated the performance of pump andfound that the performance of the system is
commercially available mono block CP connected to DC enhanced whenmaximum power point tracker (MPPT) and
series motor to utilize PV energy. They tested 3 a sun-tracker areadded to the system. The analysis of the
optimization techniques, namely (i) Optimum Value of PV array was carriedout using PSPICE software.
Motor Constant (ii) Reconfiguration of photovoltaic Theoretical results are verified byfield tests.
modules and (iii) Changing the water head. They reported (Caton, 2014)developed and tested an algorithm toestimate
that none of the optimization techniques was viable for the long-term monthly performance of a solar photovoltaic
existing pump sets. water pumping system without any battery storage
(Bouzidi, 2011)used the LLP method to optimize the PVPS systemfor fourlocations by using average monthly solar
for the different sites of Algeria. The LLP was defined as insolationinput data and estimated the total monthly
the ratio of time of water deficit divided by the total time of volume of waterpumped with hourly simulation.
water supply requirement. This technique presented a (Senol, 2012)designed a solarphotovoltaic water pump by
generalized and practical graphical tool for sizing of adding a DC-DC buck converter toprovide current boosting
SPVWPS. They reported that the PV array size for to the DC pump. No battery and inverterare used in the
southern location was smaller than the northern location system so as to reduce the cost and maintenance.The
due to availability of high solar radiations. Furthermore, it highest no-load speed goes up to 3000-3200 revolutions
was suggested that LLP method could be effectively used perminute (rpm). The results from the no load test revealed
in any geographical area for sizing the PVPS. that theintegration of DC motor with the centrifugal pump
(Bakelli et al., 2011)developed size optimization model has matchedquite perfectly. A direct coupled system
using MATLAB for SPVWPS under the meteorological without a Power Conditioning Unit (PCU) is compared
conditions of Ghardaia, Algeria.This model was based on with DC-DC convertor typesystem. The DC motor
different configurations (number of PV modules and operating voltage, operating current, shaftrpm and the
number of storage days) by loss of power supply discharge rate at different pressures during differenttimes
probability (LPSP) and LCC analysis. of a day for both systems are measured and improvement
2.5 Overview of performance analysis research inthe electrical power output is found in the designed DC
In this section performance evaluation methodologies used waterpumping system(Chandel et al., 2015).
in various studies are reviewed to provide further insight to (Boutelhig et al., 2017)analyzed the performance of
the researcher. different PVwater pumping systems for four different
(Chandel et al., 2015)developed a methodology for locations in Algeria using typical meteorological
performance predictionof a direct coupled PV water year(TMY) data. The study is carried out for three different
pumping system in South Sinai, Egyptusing a computer profiles: threetank capacities; two PVmodules types; two
simulation program. The program simulates thehourly PV array configurations and several pumping heads applied
performance of the system at any day of the year, under to two centrifugal pumpsand concluded that PV generator
costs can decrease if the simulation program accounts for utilizationefficiency is close to maximum at all insolation
the type of pump, pumping head anddaily load profile. The levels with nopeak-power tracking.
system can be optimized by studyingindividual The proposed arrangement is useful as partof an integrated
requirements using computer program based on renewable energy system.
mathematical models of a motor pump, PV generator. (Micheli et al., 2013)presented control system of
(Odesola, 2019)designed and developed a PV pump electricalpower supplied by PV to a single-phase induction
operateddrip irrigation system for arid regions considering motor which isused for water pumping applications. The
different designparameters like pump size, water overall performance of aphotovoltaic system can be
requirement, diurnal variation inpump pressure due to improved with dynamic models for the Z-source inverter,
change in irradiance and pressure compensation in the single phase induction motor and neural network based
drippers. Authors reported that a PV system with(900 Wp maximum power point tracking.
PV array, 800 W DC motor-pump mono-blocks) (Pansal et al., 2020)highlighted the potential of solar PV
canprovide 70-100 kPa pressure at the delivery side with a water pumping systems in Indiaand concluded that there is
dischargeof 3.4-3.8 l/h from each dripper during different a vast scope of replacing traditionaland diesel pumps with
hours of the day.The emission uniformity was found to be solar pumps for low and medium headpumping
92-96% in a field of 1ha.It is suggested that PV water applications but the capital costs are very high. Solarwater
pumping systems need to beextensively tested for water pumping systems are found to be more suitable for
harvesting tanks with lower suctionhead for growing drinkingwater and minor irrigation requirements due to
orchards in arid region. their cost, sizefactors considerations
(Sontake et al., 2020)studied and analyzed the performance (Hassan & Kamran, 2018)studied the performance of a PV
of aPV-powered DC motor coupled with a centrifugal waterpumping system in a village at 30 km of Keita
pump atdifferent solar intensities and corresponding cell (Niger) to meet thewater needs of 500 persons and reported
temperatures.The experimental results obtained are that the cost of one cubicmeter of water pumped by the PV
compared with calculatedvalues, and found that this system system is more advantageousthan other systems. PV water
has a good match between thePV array and the electro- pumping is found to be well suitedfor arid and semi-arid
mechanical system characteristics. Theauthors reported that areas due to the existence of undergroundwater potential,
through manual tracking i.e., changing theorientation of PV and large solar energy potential of more than6 kWh/m².
array, three times a day to face Sun, the outputobtained is (Jafar, 2000)presented a simple method for modeling the
20% more as compared to the fixed tilted PV array. outputof a solar photovoltaic water pumping system, which
(Errouha et al.,2020)investigated the steady-state relies oneasily measurable data. The procedure is applied to
performance of a PV powered DC motor driving an a Solar Star1000 pumping system to develop a model that
isolated three-phaseself-excited induction generator (SEIG) predicts thevolume flow rate for a given head and
and found that SEIG is aperfect load match for a PV irradiance. The modelpredicts the flow rates within 8% of
powered DC motor with the PVgenerator formaximum the measured values. Thesmall deviation is attributed to
utilization of efficiency. The use of a SEIGavoids the need fluctuations in the solar irradianceand unsteady module
for matching devices or peak power trackerswhich temperatures during the measurements.The highlights and
increases the total system cost. It is found that due to research findings of performance evaluation studies of PV
theunique torque speed characteristics of the SEIG, the based water pumps in different countries are summarized
in Table 8.
Table 8.Summary of PV water pumping system performance evaluation studies.
Authors Applications Outcomes
(Tawfik et al., 2014.) Domestic use Computer simulation program is used to simulate the performance of a
proposed PV water pumping system.
(Bouzidi, 2011) Irrigation Algorithm is developed to estimate the water pumped as per insolation.
(Bora et al., 2017) Domestic use System efficiency increases with MPPT and sun tracker.
(Caton, 2014) Irrigation System efficiency increased by orientation and sizing of PV array and
motor pump system.
(Senol, 2012) Domestic use System efficiency is increased by adding DC-DC buck converter for a
direct coupled PV water pumping system
(Boutelhig et al., 2017) Domestic use Predicted monthly water pumped by a system within 6% of software
prediction based on hourly data.
(Odesola, 2019) Irrigation System efficiency increased by orientation and sizing of PV array and
motor pump system.
(Sontake et al., 2020) Irrigation Two important design aspects for PV water pumping system are
identified; analyzing piping system to determine the type of pump to be
used and power system planning.
(Pansal et al., 2020) Domestic Configuration of the photovoltaic system can be improved with dynamic
models for inverter, single phase induction motor and neural network
based maximum power point tracking.
(Hassan & Kamran, 2018) Domestic use System performance and efficiency can be improved by matching the
output characteristics.
2.6 Cooling of solar photovoltaic panels climatic condition and soil type characteristic, (b) due to
The solar photovoltaic cells become heated during energy the depth of the aquifer sources pumping estimating the
conversion and also due to the effect of solar radiation. The hydraulic analysis and (c) ultimately calculating the peak
performance of the system is highly affected by heat photovoltaic power required for irrigation. With refer to
generation. Thus, it is essential to maintain the temperature their analysis, it was shown that photo-irrigation system
of photovoltaic cells to attain the maximum power output has the potential of being the immense strategies in
(Teo et al., 2012). Many investigations have been reported irrigation and improves crop production, efficiency of
with cooling of solar photovoltaic panels(Gopal et al., using the source of solar energy and water in order to make
2013),(Micheli et al., 2013). a suitable occasion for rural sustainable development.
To attain a good performance of SPWPSs,(Abdolzadeh & (Elia, Li, et al., 2015)studied the techno-economic aspects
Ameri, 2009) made an attempt by spraying water over the of different components of SPVWPS in remote regions. He
frontpanels of photovoltaic panels. It has been reported that carried out extensive experimentation with submerged,
the solarPhotovoltaic efficiency, the subsystem efficiency surface and piston pump sets run by DC or AC motor. The
and the total efficiency were improved by 3.26%, 1.40% pump was a critical component and had associated losses
and1.35%, respectively, at a head of 16m. The study also during its operation. Also, there is limit of conversion of
reported that a maximum solar Photovoltaic efficiency of solar energy by PV system. The author concluded that
approximately13.5% was achieved in their work.In similar required size of PV system and pump rating should always
work,(Kordzadeh, 2010) studied the performance of a be more than the design value to get desired volume flow
SPVWPS with a film layer of water over the cell surface. rate for given head Author emphasized that the complete
The performance of the system was evaluated under the knowledge of the energy flow and losses during the
meteorological conditions of Kerman city in Iran. It has operation, helped the designer to arrive at optimum size of
been reported thatthe performance of the SPVWPS was components of SPVWPS.
increased significantly byproviding a film layer of water (Boutelhig et al., 2017)investigated some factors affect the
over the photovoltaic cells.A recent review of work on feasibility of the system such as type of crop, geographic
cooling of solar photovoltaic panels reported that carbon location, climatic condition, depth and the rate of
Nano-tubes and a high conductive coating provide the best recharging water, costs of conventional energy,
cooling performance for solar photovoltaic panels(Gopal et government procedures and rule i.e. the taxes of carbon and
al., 2013). as the same as other, studies proved that solar irrigation
3. TECHNO-ECONOMIC ASPECT system is feasible when low power needed, which means
According to the high price of the PV panels in irrigations that from shallow wells or low flow rate pumping from
and domestic use by considering the characteristic of the deep wells. Following the method of sizing the PV panel,
soil-type, crop and the elevation of pumping(Elia, Li, et al., they concluded the area of solar array necessary land either
2015). which is the only important parameters for the technical
(Mekhilef et al., 2013) reviewed techno-economic aspect feasibility of the system. On the other hand, geographic
SPVWPS and came up with photo- irrigation theory for the location and the type of crop verify economic feasibility of
first time which is the arrangement with three main levels: the system.
(a) settling the requirements of irrigation based on the
There are two commonly used methods to determine the install. Anotherimportant characteristic is that, as they use
COE. One is the “discounting” method; second is the the sun astheir energy source, the periods of maximum
“annuitizing” method. In the discounting method as demand forwater coincide with the periods of maximum
exhibited in Eq. (2), the present value of all expenditures, solarradiation. When compared to diesel powered
i.e. investment and O&M cost incurred during lifetime, C t pumpingsystems, the cost of solar PV water pumping
is divided by the present value of electricity production systemwithout any subsidy works out to be 64.2% of the
during lifetime, Mt. Since, the discounting or present value cost ofthe diesel pump, over a life cycle of ten years.
of power generation seems unintelligible and therefore, the Solarpumps are available to pump from anywhere in the
idea can be understood that the electricity produced rangeof up to 200m head and with outputs of up to
indirectly corresponds to the revenue from the sale of this 250m³/day. In general, photovoltaic pumps are
energy(Bhayo et al., 2019). economiccompared to diesel pumps up to approximately
𝑃𝑟𝑉𝑎𝑙(𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑠) ∑𝑛 (𝐶𝑡 /(1+𝑟)𝑡 ) 3kWp forvillage water supply and to around 1kWp for
𝐶𝑂𝐸𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 = = ∑𝑛𝑡=0 𝑡 (2)
𝑃𝑟𝑉𝑎𝑙(𝑂𝑢𝑡𝑝𝑢𝑡) 𝑡=0(𝑀𝑡 /(1+𝑟) ) irrigation.SPVWPS sets represent an environmentfriendly,
In the “annuitizing” method as exhibited in Eq.(3), the low-maintenance and cost effective alternative toirrigation
present value of all expenditures incurred during project pump sets which run on grid electricity or diesel.A solar
lifetime is determined and further converted to an irrigation pump system method needs to takeaccount of the
equivalent annuity, using standard annuity formula such as fact that demand for irrigation systemwater will vary
capital recovery factor (CRF). throughout the year. Peak demand duringthe irrigation
𝐴𝑛𝑛(𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑠) (∑𝑛 𝑡
𝑡=0(𝐶𝑡 /(1+𝑟) ))×𝐶𝑅𝐹
𝐶𝑂𝐸𝐴𝑛𝑛𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑧𝑖𝑛𝑔 = = (3) system seasons is often more than twice theaverage
𝐴𝑣𝑔(𝑂𝑢𝑡𝑝𝑢𝑡) (∑𝑛
𝑡=1(𝑀𝑡 )/𝑛) demand. This means that solar pumps forirrigation are
The capital recovery factor (CRF) is determined as follows under-utilized for most of the year. The irrigationpump
𝑟×(1+𝑟)𝑡
𝐶𝑅𝐹 = (4) system should minimize water losses, withoutimposing
(1+𝑟)𝑡 −1
significant additional head on the irrigationpumping system
The annuitizing methods convert the expenditure costs to a and be of low cost. Therefore, by permanent increasing in
constant flow over time. This leads to appropriate results, the cost of conventional energy, majority of governments
when the flow of electricity output is constant. Generally, it become more interested to associate with renewable energy
is presumed that the annual electricity output is constant. sources to support their industries and society
However, the electricity output from renewable energy requirements,which causes a considerable improvement in
technologies varies drastically from day to-day due to the solar sector.
variations in the metrological conditions. Therefore, it can
be justified that discounting method is more appropriate 6. SCOPE FOR FURTHER RESEARCH
than the annuitizing methods for the COE calculations PERSPECTIVE
especially for the renewable energy systems(Bouzidi, From the cited literatures in this review paper, the
2011). following research avenues are identified in the field of
One of the misconceptions in COE calculation is that the SPVWPS and can be broadly classified in following three
summation does not begin from zero (0) i.e. t=0 to consider areas:
the project cost at the beginning of the first year(Bhayo et 1. Research on pump improvement.
al., 2019).The cost incurred in the first year should not be (i) Development of hybrid pump (auto setup ability) which
discounted to reflect present value and there is no system has characteristics of both centrifugal and helical rotor
energy output to be degraded.Therefore, the investment pumps to utilize PV electricity efficiently.
cost which is one-off payment and that occurs at the (ii) Reduction of losses by manufacturing pump from zero
beginning of first year should be taken out from friction resistance material.
discounting. In this regard, the COEDiscounting and (iii) Development of small capacity pumps for nuclear
COEAnnuitizingcan be written as follows: family, requiring low power input and hence requires low
𝐼0 +∑𝑛
𝐴𝑡 wattage PV panels.
𝑡=0(
(1+𝑟)𝑡
)
𝐶𝑂𝐸𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 = 𝑀 (5) 2. Research on power source improvement.
∑𝑛 𝑡
𝑡=0(1+𝑟)𝑡 (i) Development of cheap and simple tracking mechanisms
𝐴𝑡 for PV panel.
𝐼0+∑𝑛
𝑡=0( )∗𝐶𝑅𝐹
(1+𝑟)𝑡
𝐶𝑂𝐸𝐴𝑛𝑛𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑧𝑖𝑛𝑔 = 𝑛
(∑𝑡=1 𝑀𝑡 )
(6) (ii) Enhancement of SPVWPS performance by
𝑛 theapplication of different coolants over the PV panel
5. CONCLUSIONS fronts.
A review of current status of solar photovoltaic water (iii)Development of cheap techniques to prevent/clean
pumping system technology research and applications is formation of dust on the PV panel front surface.
presented.Photovoltaic water pumping systems are 3. Research on power management/matching improvement.
especially designed to supply water and irrigation in areas (i) Development of cheap and simple technology MPPT/
where there is no mainselectricity supply. Their main controllers
advantages over handpumps or internal combustion engine (ii) Development of new optimization methods for sizing
pumps are theirpractically zero maintenance, their long solar PV panel.
useful life, thatthey do not require fuel, that they do not
contaminate,and finally that they are straightforward to
REFERENCES [18] Elia, P., Zhu, Y., Brugiati, E., Li, H., & Yan, J. (2014). PV
[1] Ã, K. M., Fletcher, S., & Ula, S. (2008). Solar photovoltaic water pumping for irrigation equipped with a novel control
water pumping for remote locations. 12, 472–487. system for water savings. Energy Procedia, 61, 949–952.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2006.10.008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.1002
[2] Abdolzadeh, M., & Ameri, M. (2009). Improving the [19] Elrefai, M., & Hamdy, R. A. (2016). Design and Performance
effectiveness of a photovoltaic water pumping system by Evaluation of a Solar Water Pumping
spraying water over the front of photovoltaic cells. 34, 91–96. System :CaseStudy.December.https://doi.org/10.1109/MEPCO
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2008.03.024 N.2016.7837005
[3] Al-smairan, M. (2012). Application of photovoltaic array for [20] Errouha, M., Derouich, A., Motahhir, S., & Zamzoum, O.
pumping water as an alternative to diesel engines in Jordan (2020). Optimal Control of Induction Motor for Photovoltaic
Badia , Tall Hassan station : Case study. Renewable and Water Pumping System. 9.
Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(7),4500– [21] Fiaschi, D., Graniglia, R., & Manfrida, G. (2005). Improving
4507.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.033 the effectiveness of solar pumping systems by using modular
[4] Aliyu, M., Hassan, G., Elamin, I. M., Said, S. A., Siddiqui, M. centrifugal pumps with variable rotational speed. 79, 234–244.
U., & Alawami, A. T. (2018). A review of solar-powered water https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2004.11.005
pumping systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy [22] Gopal, C., Mohanraj, M., Chandramohan, P., & Chandrasekar,
Reviews, 87(February), 61–76. P. (2013). Renewable energy source water pumping systems-A
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.02.010 literature review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,
[5] Bakelli, Y., Hadj, A., & Azoui, B. (2011). Optimal sizing of 25, 351–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.04.012
photovoltaic pumping system with water tank storage using [23] Hamidat, A., & Benyoucef, B. (2009). Systematic procedures
LPSP concept. Solar Energy, 85(2), 288–294. for sizing photovoltaic pumping system , using water tank
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2010.11.023 storage. 37, 1489–1501.
[6] Bhayo, B. A., Al-kayiem, H. H., & Gilani, S. I. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.014
Assessment of standalone solar PV-Battery system for [24] Hassan, W., & Kamran, F. (2018). A hybrid PV / utility
electricity generation and utilization of excess power for water powered irrigation water pumping system for rural agricultural
pumping. Solar Energy, 194(November),766–776. areas A hybrid PV / utility powered irrigation water pumping
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.11.026 system for rural agricultural areas. Cogent Engineering, 5(1),
[7] Bora, B., Prasad, B., Sastry, O. S., Kumar, A., & Bangar, M. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2018.1466383
(2017). Optimum sizing and performance modeling of Solar [25] Jafar, M. (2000). A model for small-scale photovoltaic solar
Photovoltaic(SPV) water pumps for different climatic water pumping. 19, 4–9.
conditions. Solar Energy, 155, 1326–1338. [26] Kordzadeh, A. (2010). The effects of nominal power of array
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2017.07.058 and system head on the operation of photovoltaic water
[8] Boutelhig,A.,Hanini,S.,&Hadj,A.(2017).Performances’ pumping set with array surface covered by a film of water.
investigation of di ff erent photovoltaic water pumping system Renewable Energy, 35(5), 1098–1102.
con fi gurations for proper matching the optimal location , in https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2009.10.024
desert area. Energy Conversion and Management, [27] Koreboina, V. B., Narasimharaju, B. L., & Kumar, D. M. V.
151(August),439–456. (2016). Performance Evaluation of Switched Reluctance Motor
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.09.012 PWM Control in PV-fed Water Pump System. 6(3).
[9] Bouzidi, B. (2011). Viability of solar or wind for water [28] Kumar, S., Kumar, S., & Engineering, E. (2020). SOLAR PV
pumping systems in the Algerian Sahara regions – case study POWERED WATER PUMPING SYSTEM USING DC MOTOR
Adrar. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(9), DRIVE : A. V(Iv), 1–8.
4436–4442. [29] Kumar, V., & Hundal, B. S. (2019). Factors affecting
[10] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.108 consumer buying behaviour of solar water pumping system.
[11] Caton, P. (2014). ScienceDirect Design of rural photovoltaic 8(4), 351–364. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-10-2018-0052
water pumping systems and the potential of manual array [30] Li, G., Jin, Y., Akram, M. W., & Chen, X. (2017). Research
tracking for a West-African village. Solar Energy, 103, 288– and current status of the solar photovoltaic water pumping
302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2014.02.024 system – A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy
[12] Chand, V., & Kalamkar, V. R. (2016). Solar photovoltaic Reviews, 79(December 2016), 440–458.
water pumping system - A comprehensive review. Renewable https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.055
and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 59, 1038–1067. [31] López-luque, R., Reca, J., & Martínez, J. (2015). Optimal
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.021 design of a standalone direct pumping photovoltaic system for
[13] Chandel, S. S., Naik, M. N., & Chandel, R. (2015). Review of deficit irrigation of olive orchards. 149, 13–23.
solar photovoltaic water pumping system technology for https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.107
irrigation and community drinking water supplies. Renewable [32] Mazouz, N., & Midoun, A. (2011). Electrical Power and
and Sustainable Energy Reviews,49,1084–1099. Energy Systems Control of a DC / DC converter by fuzzy
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.083 controller for a solar pumping system. International Journal of
[14] Chandel, S. S., Naik, M. N., & Chandel, R. (2017). Review of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 33(10), 1623–1630.
performance studies of direct coupled photovoltaic water https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2011.06.016
pumping systems and case study. Renewable and Sustainable [33] Mekhilef, S., Faramarzi, S. Z., Saidur, R., & Salam, Z. (2013).
Energy Reviews, 76(November 2016), 163–175. The application of solar technologies for sustainable
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.019 development of agricultural sector. Renewable and Sustainable
[15] Ebaid, M. S. Y., Qandil, H., & Hammad, M. (2013). A unified Energy Reviews, 18, 583–594.
approach for designing a photovoltaic solar system for the https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.10.049
underground water pumping well-34 at Disi aquifer. Energy [34] Meunier, S., Heinrich, M., Quéval, L., Cherni, J. A., Vido, L.,
Conversion and Management, 75, 780–795. Darga, A., Dessante, P., Multon, B., Kitanidis, P. K., &
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.07.083 Marchand, C. (2019). A validated model of a photovoltaic
[16] Elia, P., Leduc, S., Kim, M., & Liu, J. (2015). Optimal water pumping system for off-grid rural communities. Applied
grassland locations for sustainable photovoltaic water pumping Energy, 241(March), 580–591.
systems in China. Energy Procedia, 75, 301–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.035
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.355 [35] Micheli, L., Sarmah, N., Luo, X., Reddy, K. S., & Mallick, T.
[17] Elia, P., Li, H., & Yan, J. (2015). Techno-economic feasibility K. (2013). Opportunities and challenges in micro- and nano-
of the irrigation system for the grassland and farmland technologies for concentrating photovoltaic cooling : A review.
conservation in China : Photovoltaic vs . wind power water Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 20, 595–610.
pumping. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.051
103, 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.06.034
[36] Muhsen, D. H., Khatib, T., & Nagi, F. (2017). crossmark. [47] Senol, R. (2012). An analysis of solar energy and irrigation
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 68(September systems in Turkey. Energy Policy, 47, 478–486.
2016), 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.129 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.05.049
[37] Narvarte-ferna, L. (2010). Improvement of photovoltaic [48] Sharma, R., Sharma, S., & Tiwari, S. (2019). Materials Today :
pumping systems based on standard frequency converters by Proceedings Design optimization of solar PV water pumping
means of programmable logic controllers. 84, 101–109. system. Materials Today: Proceedings, xxxx.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2009.10.013 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.322
[38] Nisha, R., & K, G. S. (2020). ScienceDirect Review of PV fed [49] Shinde, V. B., & Wandre, S. S. (2015). Solar photovoltaic
water pumping systems using BLDC Motor. Materials Today: water pumping system for irrigation : A review. 10(22), 2267–
Proceedings, 24, 1874–1881. 2273. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2015.9879
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.612 [50] Short, T. D., & Oldach, R. (2015). Solar Powered Water
[39] Nyein, Y. M., & Ya, A. Z. (2019). Design of Solar Pumping Pumps : The Past , the Present — and the
System for Rural Area. June 2011. Future ?125(February 2003).
[40] Odesola, I. F. (2019). Design of A Small Scale Solar Powered https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1528923
Water Pumping System. 8(03), 471–478. [51] Siecker, J., Kusakana, K., & Numbi, B. P. (2017). A review of
[41] Pansal, K., Ramani, B., & Panchal, H. (2020). Groundwater for solar photovoltaic systems cooling technologies. Renewable
Sustainable Development Use of solar photovoltaic with active and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 79(July 2016), 192–203.
solar still to improve distillate output : A review. Groundwater https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.053
for Sustainable Development, 10(November 2019), 100341. [52] Sontake, V. C., Tiwari, A. K., & Kalamkar, V. R. (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2020.100341 PERFORMANCE INVESTIGATIONS OF SOLAR
[42] Periasamy, P., Jain, N. K., & Singh, I. P. (2015). A review on PHOTOVOLTAIC WATER PUMPING SYSTEM USING.
development of photovoltaic water pumping system. 24(5), 2915–2927.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 43, 918–925. [53] Tawfik, E., Shenawy, E., & Sharawy, H. H. (n.d.). Economic
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.019 Analysis of Stand-Alone Hybrid Wind / PV / Diesel Water
[43] Phiri, E., Kasambara, A., & Rowley, P. N. (2020). Energy and Pumping System : A Case Study in Egypt. 1–19.
Water Needs Analysis : Towards Solar Photovoltaic Water [54] Teo, H. G., Lee, P. S., & Hawlader, M. N. A. (2012). An active
Pumping in Rural Areas of Malawi Energy and Water Needs cooling system for photovoltaic modules. Applied Energy,
Analysis : Towards Solar Photovoltaic Water Pumping in 90(1), 309–315.
Rural Areas of Malawi. March. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.01.017
https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20200013 [55] Terki, A., Moussi, A., Betka, A., & Terki, N. (2012). An
[44] Poompavai, T., & Kowsalya, M. (2019). Control and energy improved efficiency of fuzzy logic control of PMBLDC for PV
management strategies applied for solar photovoltaic and wind pumping system. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 36(3),
energy fed water pumping system : A review. Renewable and 934–944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2011.07.042
Sustainable Energy Reviews, 107(February), 108–122. [56] Tiwari, A. K., & Kalamkar, V. R. (2016). Performance
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.02.023 investigations of solar water pumping system using helical
[45] Poompavai, T., & Kowsalya, M. (2020). Investigation of pump under the outdoor condition of Nagpur , India.
Standalone Solar Photovoltaic Water Pumping System With Renewable Energy, 97, 737–745.
Reduced Switch Multilevel Inverter. 8(February), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.06.021
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2020.00009 [57] Vick, B. D., & Clark, R. N. (2011). Experimental investigation
[46] Rawat, R., Kaushik, S. C., & Lamba, R. (2016). A review on of solar powered diaphragm and helical pumps. Solar Energy,
modeling , design methodology and size optimization of 85(5), 945–954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2011.02.011
photovoltaic based water pumping , standalone and grid [58] Zaghba, L., Khennane, M., Terki, N., Borni, A., Bouchakour,
connected system. Renewable and Sustainable Energy A., & Fezzani, A. (2017). The Effect of Seasonal Variation on
Reviews, 57, 1506–1519. the Performances of Grid Connected Photovoltaic System in
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.228 Southern of Algeria. 020005.
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4976224