Speed Dam & Vis RCC Tech
Speed Dam & Vis RCC Tech
Speed Dam & Vis RCC Tech
Nilotpol Kar
Regional Marketing, BASF Construction Chemicals Asia Pacific
Jan Kluegge
Development Center, BASF Construction Chemicals Asia Pacific
Sven Asmus
Regional Marketing, BASF Construction Chemicals Asia Pacific
ABSTRACT
The accelerated economic growth in China and a few South Asian
countries is one of the key drivers of mega hydel projects to harness rivers and
generate power current and future demands of electricity. Mass concrete with
large aggregates makes up the concrete of dams. Typically this is a low slump
concrete – about 2 – 4 cm and requires a significant amount of intensive labour
and time to complete mega dams in tune of concrete above 0.5 or 1.0 million
cubic metres. Roller Compacted Concrete (RCC) – originating in Japan (for Asia
Pacific) reduced the time by about 15 – 20%.
To meet the deadlines for power generating companies or clients, the need
of the hour is to enable construction at a rapid pace and at the same time meet
durability criteria for concrete under various climatic / geographical conditions.
Today this is possible with advanced concrete technologies aided with special
admixture solutions to help accelerate and sustain speed of construction. These
revolutionary admixtures enable other distinct advantages – lower cementitious
content in concrete to help in reducing heat of hydration in mass concrete as well
improve quality of paste (improving impermeability) all of which help to increase
service life of the dam.
This paper provides an overview into two “paradigm-shifts” – one in
enhancing conventional Roller Compacted Concrete (RCC) more vibration
sensitive and generate better paste quality to respond to the vibatory rollers
faster and in the long run enable faster completeion of a RCC dam; the other is a
revolutionary step in enabling a ultra-low fines self consolidating concrete with
120 mm aggregates for rapid dam placement (referred to here as Speed Dam
Technology)
1. INTRODUCTION
Mass concrete poses many challenges, among them the generation of high
heat and problems that can stem from it. Careful design of mass concrete can
minimize or eliminate such issues enabling us to create bigger projects than ever
before. This will enable reduction of labour and time significantly for mega dams
in terms of concrete volumes above 0.5 million cubic metres.
Table 2: Analysis of cement applied in Jinghong Dam Project (Pu’er cement OPC 42.5)
Fineness [% retained on 45 μm sieve] 2.6
Density [g/cm3] 3.15
Physical analysis
Initial 2:50
Setting time [hr:min]
Final 4:30
SiO2 20.60
Fe2O3 3.08
Al2O3 5.31
CaO 65.91
Chemical analysis [mass %]
MgO 0.50
Ignition loss 0.90
SO3 2.09
K2O 0.33
Na2O 0.05
Alkali cont. 0.27
Compressive 3 days 24.5
Cement mortar strength [MPa] 28 days 57.3
GB/T17671-1999 3 days 4.8
Tensile [MPa] 28 days 8.2
1 day 179.65
2 days 228.57
3 days 254.01
Heat of hydration of cement [kJ/kg] 4 days 267.63
5 days 278.37
6 days 286.86
7 days 294.12
Fe-Mn slag 25.6 0.59 17.5 39.1 1.72 -0.88 0.10 0.82 0.15 0.69 11.0 0.35 364
Lime-stone powder 0.17 0.15 0.38 54.9 0.30 43.46 0.01 0.04 0.02 0.05 - - 340
For the RCC operation, the layers are placed in 30 cm thickness, and 12
cycles (2 cycles without vibration, 8 cycles with vibration, 2 cycles without
vibration – see Figure 3) are applied for compaction, in order to achieve a
specified in-situ density of > 2400 kg/m3. The air content is specified to the range
of 2-4%.
Setting time should be more than 10 hrs for initial and less than 14 hrs for
final at ambient temperatures of 30-40ºC. Two classes of RCC were designed,
where compressive strengths of 15 MPa at 90 days (mixture 1) and 20 MPa at 90
days (mixture 2) should be achieved, respectively.
For mixture class C9015, the maximum aggregate size is 80mm, and the
aggregates proportion:
small[5-20mm]:medium[20-40mm]:big[40- 80mm] is 30:40:30.
Table 4: Mix proportion and selected properties of concrete for test of admixtures
Mixture type
3 4 5 6 7 8
Ambient temperature [ºC] 38
W/B ratio 0.5
S/A ratio 0.31
Water [kg/m3] 75
3
Cement [kg/m ] 75
3
Fly Ash [kg/m ] -- 75
JMH supplementary
cementitious material [kg/m3] 75 --
Sand [kg/m3] 691
Aggregate (5-20mm) [kg/m3] 477
3
Aggregate (20-40mm) [kg/m ] 593
Aggregate (40-80mm) [kg/m3] 477
NS (92% solid) [Cx%] 0.6 -- -- 0.6 -- --
PCE-N [Cx%] -- 0.5 -- -- 0.5 --
PCE-RCC [Cx%] -- -- 0.5 -- -- 0.5
Air entraining admixture [Cx%] 0.015
Initial setting time [hr:min] 6:20 8:00 8:20 8:00 9:40 10:10
Final setting time [hr:min] 9:10 10:45 11:10 12:00 13:50 14:10
Based on optimization work done on the mix design and the admixture
technology developed, the mixture proportions given in Table 1, have been used
in the actual construction of the Jinhong Dam Project. Mix proportions 3, 4 and 5
include the JMH supplementary cementitious material but no fly ash, while
mixtures 6, 7 and 8 are incorporating fly ash only as a powder substitute for
cement.
To reduce the temperature increase of the mass concrete pours during setting
(hardening), the hydration heat has to be minimized . From the definition of mass
concrete as embodied in ACI 116 R.1 - “any volume of concrete with dimensions
large enough to require that measures be taken to cope with generation of heat
from hydration of the cement and attendant volume change, to minimizing
cracking.”, ther are various methods, viz., by using big size aggregates, typically
40 to 150 mm and a lean mix design with low combination of powder content
(cement, fly ash and others). The total powder content is typically less than
280 kg*m-3 for mass concrete.
5 – 10mm 272 50
40
aggregates
10 – 20mm 335 30
Coarse
20
20 – 40 mm 431 462 10
0
40 – 80 mm 579 0.1 1 10 100
IS Sieves Combined Grading
80 – 120 mm 337 141 Typ Lower Limit
Typ Upper Limit
The concrete is tested for its flowability through a slump flow test. The test is
carried out as per standard slump measurement test with the variation that the
slump cone used has the dimension of rsmall = 10 cm, rbig = 20 cm and h = 60 cm,
where rsmall is the smaller radius of the cone, rbig is the bigger radius of the cone
and h is height of the cone. Slump test gives a spread of the concrete of 110 x
115 cm for the mix done in China whereas for the case in India is 100 x 110 cm.
The concrete flows without segregation or bleeding as shown in Fig 1
Additionally, in the China experiment, a second slump test the concrete is sieved
to separate aggregate bigger than 50 mm. For the remaining concrete a slump
test according to Chinese standard GB/T 50080-2002 is done. A slump of 18 cm
and a spread of 35 x 37 cm is measured.
Comparision:
a)
Both concrete mixes were then compared with a commercially available BNS
water reducer is used at 1.5% dosage by weight of cement and tested for slump
in a similar slump cone as desribed earlier. The concrete lacks cohesion. Upon
lifting the cone the concrete collapses exhibiting segregation and heavy bleeding.
To over come the bleeding and segregation as described above, the dosage is
reduced to 1% by weight of cement, keeping other parameters constant. The
resulting concrete lacks cohesiveness. It is dry and has low workability.
For a standard slump test the China mix is sieved to separate aggregate above
50 mm is sieved. Slump of 12 cm is measured, however the slump test is not
regular due to collapsing slump cone (Scheme 2)
FIELD DEMONSTRATION
Both the above mixes were tried out in field using a special pump from a reputed
manufacturer. In the case of the mix design from China perspective, it was
possible to use pumps for transferring the concrete. Concrete of the mix design
given in table 1 has been pumped continuously without any blockage of delivery
line or pump inspite of using 120 mm maximum size aggregates with very low
cementitious fines (< 250 kg/m3 ). The pumping distance was about 200 m. After
pumping, consistency of concrete is unchanged. It was still highly workable and
flowed, without segregation. Figure 3 shows pump set up and fresh concrete after
flowing out of the pumping pipeline.
For the case with Indian aggregates, a similar set up – Fig 4 – was used for about
100 m of delivery line which showed pumpability and flowability without
segregation still using 120 mm maximum size of aggregates as well as a low
pozzolannic cement content (260 kg/m3).
DISCUSSIONS
Mass concrete is typically used in large size concrete structures, like bridge
anchorages, dams and nuclear power plant foundations. The consumption of the
mass concrete in these structures is comparably large and with poor workability
of conventional mass concrete, the placement and compaction contributes
significantly to the overall construction time.
Mass concrete is very low in powder and containing large size aggregates. The
typical mix is dry and not workable. The first technical obstacle to overcome is to
employ the same or similar mix design of the mass concrete with good flowability
and without segregation of the concrete mix. This is to achieve a fast and efficient
placement of the concrete and to reduce manual labor required in that process.
i
V. I. Teleshev, V. M. Danilov, M. V. Komarinskii, Power Technology and
Engineering 1986, 20, 345-351.