Research On Key Technology and Equipment For Zhangbei 500kV DC Grid
Research On Key Technology and Equipment For Zhangbei 500kV DC Grid
Research On Key Technology and Equipment For Zhangbei 500kV DC Grid
3 5 Fengning
Pumped-storage Kangbao
Power Station
Positive pole Positive pole
0.4kA
0.4kA
AC
Chengde
DC
2 Fengning
L12
L24 1500MW 4 6 1500MW
DC AC 3.0kA 3.0kA
AC
1
L13 L34 DC
4
Changping
AC
DC
3
2.6kA
Kangbao
Zhangbei
7 8
Beijing Zhangbei Beijing
Zhangjiakou
Positive pole Positive pole
Figure 3. Power flow distribution of Zhangbei four-terminal DC grid
2344
The 2018 International Power Electronics Conference
1 2
9 10
3 5 Fengning
Kangbao
4 6
2345
The 2018 International Power Electronics Conference
2346
The 2018 International Power Electronics Conference
0
(a) Centralized configuration mode 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
·Figure 13. The maximum transient current to be cut off by DC breaker at 6ms
after failure
2347
The 2018 International Power Electronics Conference
2348
The 2018 International Power Electronics Conference
extinguishing and the deionization of a DC fault, and then the circuit breaker to check whether their designs meet all the
semiconductor modules of the transfer branch turn on. If the specified engineering requirements.
DC fault still exists, the modules block immediately at t7 when
A. Test for Converter Valve
the current exceeds the protection threshold (ITH) to reduce the
inrush fault current. Otherwise, the main branch will be closed IEC 62501 has defined all the electrical type tests for
and the breaker is put into operation. converter valves, mainly including operational test,
short-circuit test, IGBT overcurrent turn-off test, EMC test and
dielectric test.
Among the aforementioned test items, the operational test is
to check the adequacy of converter valves under the worst
repetitive conditions and to demonstrate correct interaction
between valve electronics and power circuits. The operational
Figure 18. Schematic voltage and current waveforms during current breaking test mainly includes maximum continuous operating duty test,
and reclosing maximum temporary over-load operating duty test, minimum
DC voltage test. The maximum continuous operating duty test
The features of the proposed hybrid HVDC breaker are as is to reproduce the maximum continuous IGBT/diode junction
follows: temperatures based on the worst operating conditions of the
Excellent fault current breaking capability converter in service. The maximum temporary over-load
Better voltage distribution operating duty test is for the valve specified for temporary
UFD arc-less separation over-load conditions. The minimum DC voltage test is to verify
Fast reclosing capability the correct performance of the valve designs in which energy
Free scalability assured by modular design for the valve electronic circuits is extracted from the voltage
In order to reduce the footprint of the breaker, components appearing between the valve terminals. As required by IEC
including the UFDs, the semiconductor switches and the 62501, the test conditions shall represent the worst scenarios of
MOVs, are all integrated and installed at a 500kV high potential a valve in service, such as the operating voltage and current,
platform as shown in Figure 19. Thanks to the frame structure coolant flow rate and inlet temperature, switching frequency
design of valve support, the seismic performance can reach up and modulating pattern, etc. All these test conditions are to
to 9.0 on the Richter scale. With the modular design, this ensure that the maximum IGBT junction temperature could be
breaker can be easily scaled for higher voltage levels. achieved during the test. A safety factor, 1.05, needs to be
considered when deriving the testing voltage and current for the
maximum continuous operating duty test and similarly, a safety
factor, 0.95, needs to be considered for the testing voltage of the
minimum DC voltage test. The minimum duration required for
both tests are 30 minutes and 10 minutes, respectively.
2349
The 2018 International Power Electronics Conference
2350
The 2018 International Power Electronics Conference
REFERENCES
[1] Chengyu Li, Chengyong Zhao, Jianzhong Xu, et al. “A Pole-to-Pole
Short-Circuit Fault Current Calculation Method for DC Grids”, IEEE
Transactions on Power Systems, 2017, 11pages.
[2] Leterme W, Hertem D V. “Classification of Fault Clearing Strategies for
HVDC Grids”, Cigre Lund Symposium 2015, Sweden.
[3] Li, Rui, et al. “Continuous operation of radial multi-terminal HVDC
systems under DC fault”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2016,
11pages.
[4] Sano, Kenichiro, and Masahiro Takasaki. “A surge-less solid-state DC
circuit breaker for voltage-source-converter-based HVDC systems”,
IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2014, 10.
[5] Cui S, Sul S K. “A Comprehensive DC Short-Circuit Fault Ride Through
Strategy of Hybrid Modular Multilevel Converters (MMCs) for Overhead
Line Transmission”, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2016,
17pages.
[6] Oliveira R, Yazdani A. “A Modular Multilevel Converter with DC Fault
Handling Capability and Enhanced Efficiency for HVDC System
Applications”, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2016, 12pages.
[7] ADAM G P,ANAY A O,BURT G.Multi-terminal DC transmission
system based on modular multilevel converter[C]//Proceedings of the
44th International Universities Power Engineering Conference,Glasgow,
Scotland,UK, 2009:1-5.
[8] NAMI A,LIANG J,DIJKHUIZEN F,et al.Analysis of modular
multilevel converters with DC short circuit fault blocking capability in
bipolar HVDC transmission systems[C]//17th Power Electronics and
Applications of Conference,Geneva, 2015, 1-10.
[9] G.F. TANG, X. G. WEI, W.D. ZHOU, “Research and Development of a
Full-bridge Cascaded Hybrid HVDC Breaker for VSC-HVDC
Applications,” CIGRE 2016 Session, Paris, paper A3-117, Sep.2016.
[10] X. Ding, G. F. Tang, and M. X. Han, “Current-breaking test method based
on LC source for hybrid HVDC circuit breaker,” Electric Power
Construction, vol.38, no. 08, pp. 2-9, 2017.
[11] Ding, G. F. Tang, and M. X. Han, “Characteristic parameters extraction
and application of the hybrid DC circuit breaker in MMC-HVDC,”
Proceedings of the CSEE, vol.38, no. 01, pp. 32-39, 2018.
[12] X. Ding, G. F. Tang, and M. X. Han, “Design and equivalence evaluation
of type test for hybrid DC circuit breaker,” Power System Technology,
vol.42, no. 01, pp. 72-78, 2018.
2351