2022-06-24 Fourth Amended Petition Cause No. 22-CCV-070378
2022-06-24 Fourth Amended Petition Cause No. 22-CCV-070378
2022-06-24 Fourth Amended Petition Cause No. 22-CCV-070378
6/24/2022 8:39 AM
Laura Richard
County Clerk
Fort Bend County, Texas
NO. 22-CCV-070378
1
See TRCP 37 and 39.
2
See TRCP 37 and 39.
3
See TRCP 37 and 39.
4
See TRCP 37 and 39.
5
See TRCP 37 and 39.
Page -1-
TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
LLC, Imperial Lofts LLC owner, David Oubre, Chinasa Ogbureke, and
formed under the laws of, and registered with, the Texas Secretary of
located and doing business in Fort Bend County, Texas. Imperial Lofts
LLC “Owner” are the true “shills” used by NRES services (Nolan) to do
Page -2-
business, as Imperial Lofts, David Oubre, and Chinasa Ogbureke, on
conduct business in Fort Bend County, Texas using the Plaintiff LLP’s
3. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over the claims raised
by Plaintiffs in that all or part of the torts and crimes alleged in this
exceeds the minimal amount required by law, and does not, at this time
6
Because criminal conduct as defined by the laws of this state and
the laws of the United States was committed by the Defendants, the
statutory cap on punitive damages does not apply.
Page -3-
II. CITATIONS AND SERVICE
June 23rd 2022, by appearing and filing a written pleading in the case.
Texas, under the guise of they registered the disputed LLP “first”.
That alone joins the issue, and sets the stage under Chapter 37 of
Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code as the Plaintiffs cannot be the
Street, Suite 900, Dallas, Texas, 75201. The clerk is requested to issue
Page -4-
one citation for Imperial Lofts OWNER LLC for service on CT.
business in Texas.
14. Nolan Real Estate Services, Inc., forfeited its right to do business
15. To get around that slight issue, Nolan Red retained and used the
various frauds, crimes, and torts against not only the State of Texas,
Page -5-
16. As part and parcel to these continuing and never ending circular
recourse.
who dares to question this very profitable, and very illegal relationship.
18. As just one recent example, Plaintiffs would show that from
scam, and both Jones and Bitgood were the victims of a crime, where
20. To carry out the process of protecting the true corporate criminal,
Page -6-
Nolan Real Estate, Hoover Slovacek apparently directed Nolan Red’s
to:
and frauds upon not only the Plaintiffs, but also upon the integrity of
the Courts, they doubled down on December 17,th 2021, after being
Page -7-
would not be readily located, under the mistaken belief that this
wipe clean their frauds, felonies, and the torts inflicted on Plaintiffs.
22. Plaintiffs would further show that Martinez and Sullivan, with
Page -8-
attached to the Plaintiff’s third amended petition as if
Code that the Defendants have engaged in a scheme and plan and have
identity, stolen the identity of Plaintiff domestic LLP to carry out and
Texas which has visited harm, not only on these Plaintiffs, but also on
Plaintiff named Lewis, Brisbois, Bisgaard & Smith LLP (from herein
after the Lewis LLP), and a set of imposters, Oubre and Ogbureke,
the LLP. This is tantamount to the Lewis LLP, suing itself, something
Page -9-
For these reasons, Plaintiffs seek both a temporary and permanent
injunction to enjoin all the defendants from using the Plaintiff LLP’s
name anywhere in the State of Texas, along with all the proceeds that
were billed and collected by the phoney Lewis Brisbois since May 26th,
2022, along with a declaration that the phoney Lewis Brisbois has no
Martinez and Sullivan brought before justice of the peace Justin Joyce
of Fort Bend Precinct Three (pre-2022, now Precinct 4), evicted the
conduct purported to invoke the jurisdiction of the court and, when the
issue of jurisdiction was raised in at least one case, the justice of the
7
By way of clear explanation, the phoney Lewis Brisbois
voluntarily gave up it’s right to do business in Texas under that name,
when despite repeated warnings from the secretary of state directed at
Oubre, and to it’s California office to renew, Oubre did nothing, as the
secretary of state allowed him to do to surrender the name, and allowed
the foreign LLP to expire, thereby allowing the domestic LLP to
formed, registered and approved by the Texas Secretary of State. Like
any other race in the world, the first to the “finish line” is declared the
“winner” by the Secretary of State.
Page -10-
25. Plaintiffs’ will further show that Sullivan/Martinez and Imperial,
concessions, and other gifts given to, routinely use, by way of bribery,
intimidate, and to threaten anyone who opposes them with the threat
against them, and to divert attention away from the serious felony
Oubre, Martinez and Sullivan set out to interfere with the core
the false narrative being put out by Sullivan and Martinez, Easton
that discussed the very substance and truth of the matters at Imperial
Page -11-
Lofts which also exposed the viciousness of Sullivan, and the mental
pleadings, while the City of Sugar Land was resisting all attempts to
8
Officer Spencer has created his own set of problems for himself,
for while manufacturing a non-existent criminal offense, Spencer
knowingly and willfully placed false information in the offense report
knowing the entries were false, and then tendered the false entries to
the district attorney’s office. His actions constitute the felony offense of
tampering with governmental records, and because Texas is a law of
the parties state, that offense was also committed by Edmunds,
Sullivan and Martinez. See Tex P. Code 37.10.
Page -12-
28. In Jones’ case, and after Jones prevailed in his illegal eviction
so that they could once again evict Jones, and then have their
Jones, for the offense of criminal trespass under Tex. P. Code 30.05 (a)
(2).
Jones with more illegal action if he fails to capitulate to the will of the
Defendants.
fees, pre and post judgement interest, and punitive damages as the
Page -13-
conscience of the good citizens of Fort Bend County will allow. In
addition under Chapter 37, Plaintiffs’ pray for declaratory relief as set
Respectfully submitted,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
On June 24th 2022, I certify that I served a true and correct copy
of Plaintiffs’ Amended Petition via the Texas e-filing system
Page -14-
Automated Certificate of eService
This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system.
The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system
on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing
certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a
certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules.
Case Contacts
Name
Karina Martinez
Brice Beale
Marianna Sullivan
Steven RLewis
Jana Lubert
Melissa Singer
Automated Certificate of eService
This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system.
The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system
on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing
certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a
certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules.