20240227line5 Tribal Biden Letter
20240227line5 Tribal Biden Letter
20240227line5 Tribal Biden Letter
Re: Seventh Circuit Request to the United States for its Views Regarding the Transit
Pipeline Treaty and Tribal Sovereignty in Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe
of Chippewa Indians v. Enbridge Energy Company, Inc.
On December 12, 2023, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
requested the United States submit its views in a case squarely implicating your Administration’s
commitment to Tribal sovereignty, Tribal treaty rights, the protection of our Nation’s precious
waterways, and the transition away from a fossil fuel economy. Despite this request being made
over two months ago and oral argument having been held on February 8, 2024, the United States
has yet to substantively respond to the Circuit Court. The undersigned Tribal Leaders, who
represent Tribal Nations across Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin respectfully urge your
Administration to weigh in forcefully in support of our sovereignty and way of life.
As explained in the attached letter from Bad River Band and Bay Mills Indian
Community, for over a decade, Enbridge Inc., a Canadian pipeline company, has illegally
pumped petroleum products across the Bad River Reservation in northern Wisconsin through a
pipeline known as Line 5, which transports oil and natural gas produced in western Canada
principally to its terminal point in Sarnia, Ontario. Enbridge has continued to do so despite the
2013 expiration of the easements it held to cross the Reservation, the Bad River Band’s repeated
requests that it leave, and the uniquely high risk of a rupture where Line 5 crosses and lies
directly within the Bad River’s natural migration. If such a rupture were to occur, nearly one
1
million gallons of oil would spill into the river, flowing into Lake Superior and devasting the
wild rice beds and fishing populations central to the Band’s way of life.
Last June, a federal district court held that Enbridge has knowingly trespassed on the Bad
River Reservation since 2013 and is creating a public nuisance at the river crossing, and it
ordered Enbridge to cease operating Line 5 on the Reservation by June 2026. Although the
district court gave Enbridge three more years to operate its pipeline in violation of the Band’s
sovereignty, Enbridge appealed the ruling to the Seventh Circuit and argued that it must be
allowed to trespass indefinitely. Specifically, Enbridge has argued that the 1977 Transit Pipeline
Treaty between the United States and Canada prohibits any State, Tribal Nation, or arm of the
Federal Government, including a Federal court, from taking any action that would impede the
flow of oil through a cross-border pipeline. Canada has vociferously supported Enbridge
throughout the litigation, including through the filing of an amicus curiae brief in the Seventh
Circuit endorsing Enbridge’s radical interpretation of the Transit Treaty. The Seventh Circuit has
asked the United States to file an amicus brief with its views on the Transit Treaty and any other
issues in the case it wishes to discuss. If the court adopts Enbridge’s and Canada’s interpretation
of the Transit Treaty while the United States remains silent, the decision will fundamentally
undermine bedrock principles of Tribal sovereignty for all Tribal Nations throughout the United
States. The Bad River Band should not be left to wage an existential fight against Enbridge and
Canada while its trustee and treaty partner, the United States, remains on the sidelines.
Tribal Nations are separate sovereign governments that exercise inherent sovereign
authority. One aspect of the inherent sovereign authority that Tribal Nations have retained is
their absolute right and power to exclude non-Indians from, condition non-Indians’ entry on, and
expel trespassing non-Indians from Tribal lands. This right is a core aspect of Tribal sovereignty
and has been repeatedly affirmed by the United States Supreme Court for over two centuries.
Moreover, many Tribal Nations, like the Bad River Band, have entered into treaties with the
United States guaranteeing them permanent homelands and reserving for them the right to
exclude non-Indians from their homelands. These treaties are the supreme law of the land.
If the Seventh Circuit does not hear from the United States, and it adopts Enbridge and
Canada’s interpretation of the Transit Treaty, that would have devastating consequences for
Tribal Nations and Tribal sovereignty. Multiple federal statutes categorically protect Tribal land
from condemnation, and that protection has been critical to preserving what remains of Tribal
land bases. But Enbridge and Canada’s preferred interpretation of the Transit Treaty would
effectively grant condemnation power to transit pipeline companies by allowing them to trespass
indefinitely without regard for Tribal sovereignty. Enbridge and Canada’s interpretation of the
Transit Treaty attempts to abrogate Tribal treaties and undermine Tribal Nations’ most
fundamental sovereign obligations to provide for the health, welfare, and security of their Tribal
members. And their arguments, if wrongly accepted, would impair the ability of the United
States, as trustee, to remove trespassing transit pipelines from lands held in trust for Tribal
Nations.
Enbridge and Canada’s interpretation not only aims to eviscerate Tribal Nations’ inherent
sovereign authority to protect and manage their lands and resources, but also would do the same
for the Federal Government and every State and private landowner along the Canadian border
2
with a cross-border pipeline traversing its lands. Any effort to enforce the property rights of a
State, Tribal Nation, local government, or private party would be forbidden. This radical
interpretation of the Transit Treaty would even prevent Tribal Nations, as well as the Federal
Government, States, and private individuals from refusing to have their lands used in the
rerouting of cross-border pipelines.
The United States’ silence on this issue, in the face of the Seventh Circuit’s request and
Canada’s vociferous support of Enbridge, is deeply concerning. By remaining silent and not
forcefully refuting Enbridge’s and Canada’s radical interpretation of the Transit Treaty, the
United States is abdicating its trust responsibility to the Bad River Band and to all Tribal
Nations, in favor of a foreign country and foreign corporation. This issue is of great significance
to all Tribal Nations in Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin, transversed, as our region is, with
numerous cross-border pipelines. We are all keenly watching to see what the United States will
do.
We urge your Administration to voice its unequivocal support for the Bad River Band
and more generally for Tribal rights, the rule of law, and the protection of some of our Nation’s
most precious waterways.
3
Ken Meshigaud, Chairman Rebecca Richards, Chairwoman
Hannahville Indian Community Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians