Item Analysis Table Sem. Jonathan Racelis
Item Analysis Table Sem. Jonathan Racelis
Item Analysis Table Sem. Jonathan Racelis
It em Options Upper Lower Difference D value Interpretation Middle R P value Interpretation Decision
27% 27% 46%
1 A 3 6 5
B*** 15 9 6 .261 Discriminating 16 40 .470 Moderately Accept
Difficult
C 4 6 10
D 1 2 8
2 A*** 15 4 11 .478 Discriminating 33 52 .605 Easy Needs Revision
B
C
D
3 A
B
C*** 13 11 2 0.086 Moderately 31 55 .647 Easy Needs Revision
Discriminating
D
4 A
B
C
D*** 11 19 8 0.347 Discriminating 28 58 .682 Easy Needs Revision
5 A
B*** 17 14 3 0.13 Moderately 25 56 .658 Easy
Discriminating
C
D
6 A*** 15 15 0 0 Moderately 33 63 .741 Easy Needs Revision
Discriminating
B
C
D
7 A
B
C
D*** 14 7 7 0.304 Discriminating 30 51 .6 Easy Needs Revision
8 A
B*** 11 9 2 0.086 Moderately 25 45 .529 Moderately May Need Revision
Discriminating Difficult
C
D
To compute d value: Index of Discrimination (Goodness)
D value = RU – RL / NU or NL
D value = The number of examinees who got the correct answer in the Upper 27% minus the number of examinees who got the correct answer from
the lower 27% divide the number of students who belong to upper 27% or lower 27%.
P value = R/N
P value = the total number of examinees from the upper 27%, lower 27% and from the middle 46% divide the total number of examinees