Devlin 2018
Devlin 2018
Devlin 2018
PII: S0304-3894(18)30917-8
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.10.017
Reference: HAZMAT 19837
Please cite this article as: Ryan Devlin T, Kowalski MS, Pagaduan E,
Zhang X, Wei V, Oleszkiewicz JA, Electrocoagulation of raw wastewater using
aluminum, iron, and magnesium electrodes, Journal of Hazardous Materials (2018),
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.10.017
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication.
As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript.
The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof
before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process
errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that
apply to the journal pertain.
Electrocoagulation of raw wastewater using aluminum, iron, and magnesium
electrodes
Tanner Ryan Devlin, Maciej S. Kowalski, Efren Pagaduan, Xugang Zhang, Victor Wei, Jan
PT
A. Oleszkiewicz
RI
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada, R3T 5V6
SC
*
Email: [email protected]
U
Highlights
N
A
Max. COD removal at 600 mA for 30 min:Al-Al=68±9%; (Fe-
M
Fe)+air=6.8; Mg-Mg=0.9.
ABSTRACT
Primary influent from a municipal wastewater treatment plant was electrochemically treated
with sacrificial aluminum, iron, and magnesium electrodes. The influence of sacrificial
1
anodes on the removal of chemical oxygen demand, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and
on treated supernatant and biogas production was monitored on settled solids. Changes in
alkalinity, conductivity, and pH were also recorded. Aluminum and iron electrodes provided
PT
high rates of orthophosphate removal (i.e., 6.8 mg-P/mmol-e). Aluminum and iron electrodes
RI
also provided similar treatment to equivalent doses of alum and ferric salts (i.e., 38-68%
chemical oxygen demand, 10-13% total nitrogen, and 67-93% total phosphorus). The
SC
estimated stochiometric ratio of aluminum and iron dosed to orthophosphate removed was
approximately 1.3:1 and 4.1:1, respectively. Magnesium electrodes, on the other hand,
U
removed orthophosphate at rates 8-9 times slower than aluminum and iron (i.e., 0.9 mg-
N
P/mmol-e). Magnesium had to be dosed at a ratio of 13.5:1 orthophosphate for phosphorus
A
removal. Orthophosphate removal by magnesium electrodes was most likely limited by
M
Magnesium electrodes removed 49% chemical oxygen demand and 21% total nitrogen at the
TE
Keywords
1. Introduction
organic/inorganic pollutants from both municipal and industrial sources. Economies of scale
allow for large urban centres to apply advanced treatment technologies with less of a burden
on residents [1]. Therefore, most large WWTPs are adequately designed to remove the
2
pollutant load from wastewaters before they enter the environment. In contrast, smaller
communities, do not benefit from the same economies of scale [2,3]. Compounding factors
PT
personnel drives the cost of WWTPs up in small communities. Deficiencies in WWTPs and
RI
sanitation in general create exposure pathways by which transmissible enteric, skin, eye, and
other disease can be contracted and subsequently spread among the community [4]. This has
SC
resulted in millions of preventable deaths each year among populations at risk [5]. Thus,
U
material capable of inflicting harm through unintentional direct contact, cross contamination
N
of drinking water sources, or bioaccumulation of contaminants such as metals in the food
A
chain [6,7].
M
development of reliable processes that minimize external requirements (i.e., chemicals and
TE
electricity) and have a high degree of robustness to address daily, seasonal, and irregular
EP
but require regular shipments of metal salts or other chemical mixtures. Especially for remote
communities, the shipment of conventional chemicals such as alum and ferric may be an
A
expensive and unreliable endeavour. The ideal chemical process for wastewater treatment in
remote communities would operate with low consumables while significantly improving the
3
wetlands by diverting more of the organic load to stabilization processes such as composting
or digestion [11,12]. Diversion of particulate organics could also improve nitrification since
less oxygen would be required for the oxidation of organic material [13]. Furthermore,
PT
biodegradability of the diverted stream compared to biomass that would have been generated
RI
if the particulate organics were not diverted [14].
SC
Electrocoagulation processes generate coagulants in situ through electrolytic
U
removes colloidal matter while entrapping additional compounds such as orthophosphates
N
[15]. The advantages of electrocoagulation include simple and easily operated equipment,
A
reliable and effective treatment, as well as the formation of flocs that settle well and are easily
M
dewatered [16]. Previous studies have demonstrated chemical oxygen demand (COD)
removal of up to 75% during primary treatment [17]. It has also been demonstrated to be an
D
energy efficient option to achieve low orthophosphate residuals, with iron electrodes
TE
providing the lowest cost [18]. Electrocoagulation processes should therefore be of interest
EP
to remote communities for their low power requirements, capabilities to enhance primary
sedimentation, use of dense material that is more convenient to transport, and minimal impact
CC
on water chemistry such as alkalinity and pH that will not affect downstream processes such
as nitrification [19]. Furthermore, novel electrode materials such as magnesium may provide
A
4
In this study, primary influent (PI) from a WWTP in Winnipeg, Canada was subjected
electrodes in 10 L batch tests. Removal efficiencies for organics and nutrients were measured
PT
quantified in the treated supernatants and anaerobic stabilization of settled solids was
RI
analyzed by volatile solids destruction and biogas potential. The objective was to elucidate
SC
a novel sacrificial anode material with potential for mainstream phosphorus recovery.
U
2. Material and methods
N
2.1. Reactor, electrochemical device, and wastewater characteristics
A
An acrylic continuously stirred-tank reactor (CSTR) with a working volume of 10 L
M
was used for experimentation. The CSTR was mixed with a magnetic mixer and stirring bar
at approximately 120 rpm. Batch tests were conducted using 10 L of freshly collected PI grab
D
samples from a municipal wastewater treatment plant in Winnipeg, Canada. The PI was
TE
sampled from a concrete channel post-grit removal – Table 1. Each set of conditions was
EP
Alkalinity
270 340 ± 30 390
(mg-CaCO3/L)
Conductivity
2.0 2.4 ± 0.3 2.8
(mS/cm2)
5
pH
7.0 7.5 ± 0.2 7.9
(-)
COD
180 300 ± 80 490
(mg/L)
TN
35 40 ± 3 47
PT
(mg/L)
TP
3.9 4.5 ± 0.3 5.0
RI
(mg/L)
SC
The electrochemical cell consisted of a submerged anode and cathode, both the same
material (i.e., either aluminum, iron, or magnesium) as flat sheets, in the 10 L CSTR. Iron
U
electrodes were examined with and without aeration (i.e., 2 L/min air, or 1 liquid volume
N
every 5 min), since oxygen can convert ferrous iron to ferric iron and thereby change the
A
chemistry of removal. The submerged dimensions were 10 cm wide by 20 cm deep, resulting
M
in a submerged surface area of 200 cm2. The anode and cathode were electrically connected
D
via copper wire and a DC power supply (Model BOP 100-2D, KEPCO Inc., USA). The
TE
applied current was maintained at a fixed rate, which varied from 200 mA to 3.8 A during
the study. The resulting current densities were therefore 1-20 mA/cm2. The following half-
EP
Al(s) → Al3+ + 3 ∙ e−
A
Once aluminum has solubilized, longer-chain aluminum hydroxides can develop depending
6
Al3+ + H2 O → Al(OH)2+ + H +
Al(OH)2+ + H2 O → Al(OH)+
2 +H
+
Al(OH)+
2 + H2 O → Al(OH)3 + H
+
PT
Al(OH)3 + H2 O → Al(OH)−
4 +H
+
RI
At the anode with iron:
SC
Fe(s) → Fe2+ + 2 ∙ e−
U
Ferrous iron generated at the anode can be oxidized to ferric iron in the presence of oxygen:
N
A
4 ∙ Fe2+ + O2 + 4 ∙ H + → 4 ∙ Fe3+ + 2 ∙ H2 O
M
Mg (s) → Mg 2+ + 2 ∙ e−
TE
2 ∙ H + + 2 ∙ e− → H2 (g) ↑
CC
The dissolved metals could remove COD, TN, and TP through many mechanisms,
including but not limited to: 1) direct precipitation of ionic species such as orthophosphate
A
phosphate); 2) entrapment of both ionic and organic species in larger flocs such as
7
hydroxides; and 3) micro-flocculation of colloidal particles via destabilization with metal
PT
Samples were analyzed for COD, total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP;
TNTplus, Hach, CA), total ammonia nitrogen (TAN), nitrite nitrogen, nitrate nitrogen, and
RI
orthophosphate (OP; Lachat QuikChem 8500, HACH, CA). The removal of organic,
SC
nitrogen, and phosphorus fractions was calculated according to Equation 1.
𝐶𝑂 −𝐶
𝑅𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑣𝑎𝑙 = ∙ 100 (1)
𝐶𝑂
U
Where removal (i.e., %) was calculated as the difference between initial (i.e., CO, mg/L) and
N
final (i.e., C, mg/L) concentrations divided by the initial concentration multiplied by 100.
A
Samples for total suspended solids (TSS), volatile suspended solids (VSS), and
M
conductivity were performed using probes (accumet Excel XL50, Fisher Scientific, USA).
TE
Nitrification rates were quantified twice; once as the ammonium utilization rate (AUR) and
then again as the nitrite/nitrate production rate (NPR). The only difference between AUR and
EP
NPR is that the AUR included incorporation of ammonium nitrogen into new biomass and
was therefore not a true representation of autotrophic nitrogen removal. However, for these
CC
experiments the AUR served as an additional level of certainty. NPR (i.e., Equation 2) was
calculated from kinetic test data (i.e., the slope of nitrite/nitrate production) and was
A
concentration in a unit of time with respect to the amount of biomass. Analogically, AUR
(i.e., Equation 3) was calculated from t kinetic test data (i.e., the slope of ammonium removal)
8
and was expressed as mg-NH4-N/(g-VSS•h). AUR describes the decrease in ammonia
𝑚𝑁𝐻4 −𝑁 𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑣𝑎𝑙
𝐴𝑈𝑅 =
PT
(3)
𝑉𝑆𝑆𝑏𝑖𝑜𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠
Where m was the slope of nutrient concentration versus time and VSS biomass was the
RI
concentration of biomass in the kinetic test.
SC
The production of biogas from anaerobic digestions of settled solids was quantified
U
using a waterbath (PolyScience®, USA). All samples that required filtration were run through
N
medium porosity Q5 filter paper (Fisher Scientific, CA). Solids destruction and biogas yield
A
were calculated according to Equation 4 and Equation 5, respectively.
M
𝑉𝑆𝑆𝑂 −𝑉𝑆𝑆
𝑆𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 = ∙ 100 (4)
𝑉𝑆𝑆𝑂
D
𝑉𝑏𝑖𝑜𝑔𝑎𝑠
𝐵𝑖𝑜𝑔𝑎𝑠 𝑦𝑖𝑒𝑙𝑑 = (5)
(𝑉𝑆𝑆𝑂 −𝑉𝑆𝑆)∙𝑉𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟
TE
Where solids destruction (i.e., %) was calculated as the difference between initial (i.e., VSSO,
mg/L) and final (i.e., VSS, mg/L) concentrations divided by the initial concentration
EP
multiplied by 100. Biogas yield (i.e., L-biogas/g-VSS destroyed) was calculated as the total
CC
volume of biogas produced (i.e., Vbiogas, L) divided by the product of reactor volume (i.e.,
Vreactor, L) and the difference between initial (i.e., VSSO, g/L) and final (i.e., VSS, g/L)
A
concentrations.
9
The first set of experiments performed at 600 mA with an electrolysis time of 30 min
and settling time of 45 min provided insight on how aluminum, iron, and magnesium
electrodes performed under similar conditions – Figure 1. Aluminum electrodes provided the
best and most reliable removal of COD. Observed removal of COD with aluminum
PT
electrodes was 68±9%, while observed TN and TP removals were 10±20% and 70±20%,
RI
respectively. Aluminum electrodes also removed 28±5% of sCOD, -12±5% of TAN (i.e.,
negative value represents potentially hydrolysis of organic nitrogen), and 92±2% of OP.
SC
Observed COD, TN, and TP removal with iron electrodes ranged from 40±30%, 10±30%,
and 90±20%, respectively. Iron electrodes also removed 30±20% of sCOD, -5±8% of TAN,
U
and 92±4% of OP.
N
Overall, magnesium electrodes provided the worst treatment. At 600 mA applied for
A
30 min, the observed removal of COD, TN, and TP with magnesium electrodes ranged from
M
27±3%, 5±2%, and 18±2%, respectively. Magnesium electrodes removed 8±5% of sCOD,
D
2±3% of TAN, and 21±7% of OP. All treatments with electrodes enhanced the removal of
TE
COD, TN, and TP during sedimentation compared to the control, which removed 14±2% of
COD, 3±4% of TN, and 6±8% of TP. The control also removed -3±5% sCOD, 2±3% TAN,
EP
and 3±5% OP (i.e., negligible removal of soluble species). In all cases COD and TP removals
CC
were the most improved in all cases, compared to the control, while the least benefit was
10
PT
RI
SC
U
N
A
M
D
TE
EP
CC
A
Figure 1. Top – Removal of COD, TN, and TP with aluminum, iron, and magnesium
electrodes at 600 mA applied for 30 min followed by a 45 min settling period; Bottom –
Removal of sCOD, TAN, and OP with aluminum, iron, and magnesium electrodes at 600
11
mA applied for 30 min followed by a 45 min settling period. The control included only the
Compared to an equivalent dose of alum and ferric as metal salts (i.e., 0.6 mmol-
Me/L), aluminum and iron electrodes with 600 mA applied for 30 min provided similar COD,
PT
TN, and TP removals – Figure 2. Alum salt removed 70±30% of COD, 10±20% of TN, and
RI
70±20% of TP. Compared to aluminum electrodes, alum was only capable of removing up
to an additional 3.4% of TN and 18.3% of TP. Alum salt did not remove additional COD.
SC
Similarly, ferric salt was observed to remove 50±10% of COD, 11±1% of TN, and 91±5%
of TP. Compared to iron electrodes, ferric salt removed up to an additional 12% of COD, 1%
U
of TN, and 2.2% of TP. Compared to aluminum and iron electrodes, alum salt and ferric salt
12
PT
RI
SC
U
N
Figure 2. Top – Removal of COD, TN, and TP with aluminum and iron electrodes at 600
A
mA applied for 30 min followed by a 45 min settling period. Shown with COD, TN, and TP
M
removals for an equivalent dose (0.6 mmol-Me/L) of metal salt; Bottom – Removal of sCOD,
D
TAN, and OP with aluminum and iron electrodes at 600 mA applied for 30 min followed by
TE
a 45 min settling period. Shown with sCOD, TAN, and OP removals for an equivalent dose
(0.6 mmol-Me/L) of metal salt. Error bars represent one standard deviation.
EP
achieve comparable results to metal salt addition. It is interesting to note that alum salt
CC
removed more TP than aluminum electrodes, while ferric salt removed more COD that iron
electrodes. The reason for alum salt’s increased TP removal performance may be pH related.
A
The pH of the raw wastewater was 7.6±0.1, while the pH of wastewater treated with alum
salt was 6.3±0.2 and the pH of wastewater treated with aluminum electrodes was 7.6±0.7.
Minimum solubility of aluminum occurs at pH 6-7 [22], thus aluminum would have been
13
less soluble when alum salt was used. The lower solubility of aluminum with alum salt
addition may explain the higher TP removal, since more aluminum would have been
available for precipitation/entrapment. Similarly, the improved COD removal by ferric salt
may be explained by pH. The minimum solubility of ferric iron occurs at pH 8 [23] and
PT
ferrous iron occurs at pH >11 [24]. Without aeration, the iron electrodes would have been
RI
generating ferrous iron [25], which would have been more soluble than the ferric dosed as
salt. It may be that ferric removed more COD due to its lower solubility at the final pH of
SC
reaction and thereby more adsorption/entrapment of organic matter by ferric. Furthermore,
the higher charge of ferric compared to ferrous may have contributed to enhanced
U
destabilization of the electrical double layer, thereby resulting in micro-flocculation of
N
colloidal particles and their removal. Although ferric has a higher charge than ferrous, there
A
would be significantly less soluble ferric iron than soluble ferrous iron at the pH of reaction
M
and therefore enhanced particle destabilization was not likely a contributing factor to the
D
It should be noted that there was a significant difference in pH and alkalinity between
aluminum and iron electrodes and their metal salt counterparts. During electrocoagulation,
EP
the pH and alkalinity slightly increased during treatment. However, metal salt addition
CC
resulted in a significant decrease in both pH and alkalinity. The initial and final pH for alum
salt treatment ranged from 7.60-7.64 and 6.67-6.73, respectively. Similarly, the initial and
A
final pH for ferric salt treatment ranged from 7.61-7.70 and 7.04-7.18, respectively.
Regarding alkalinity, the initial and final values with alum salt ranged from 340-350 mg-
CaCO3/L and 160-190 mg-CaCO3/L, respectively. The initial and final alkalinity for ferric
14
salt ranged from 350-355 mg-CaCO3/L and 270-280 mg-CaCO3/L, respectively. In general,
the alum salt had the greatest impact on pH and alkalinity. Overall, the electrocoagulation
PT
removed [26].
RI
The performance of iron electrodes was also examined in the absence and presence
SC
or TP with iron electrodes. However, COD removal did increase significantly. In the presence
of 2 L/min air (i.e., 1 liquid volume every 5 min), iron electrodes removed 60±30% of COD,
U
12±3% TN, and 93±5% of TP. Thus, the speciation of iron generated during
N
electrocoagulation did have a significant impact on COD removal during sedimentation. In
A
fact, COD removal with iron electrodes in the presence of aeration was like COD removal
M
with ferric salt, suggesting that ferric was better at removing COD than ferrous. As previously
D
mentioned, this was likely because ferric was less soluble than ferrous at the pH of solution,
TE
15
PT
RI
SC
U
N
A
M
D
TE
EP
CC
A
Figure 3. Top – Removal of COD, TN, and TP with iron electrodes in the absence or presence
of aeration at 600 mA applied for 30 min followed by a 45 min settling period. Shown with
COD, TN, and TP removals for an equivalent dose (0.6 mmol-Me/L) of metal salt; Bottom
16
– Removal of sCOD, TAN, and OP with iron electrodes in the absence or presence of aeration
at 600 mA applied for 30 min followed by a 45 min settling period. Shown with sCOD, TAN,
and OP removals for an equivalent dose (0.6 mmol-Me/L) of metal salt. Error bars represent
PT
3.2. Orthophosphate removal rates
RI
Aluminum, iron, and magnesium electrodes were studied under various current
intensities and electrolysis times for OP removal – Figure 4. The removal rate of OP per
SC
electron moles dosed (i.e., product of current intensity and electrolysis time divided by
Faraday’s constant) were similar for aluminum and iron electrodes. In fact, the combined
U
dataset for OP residual as a function of electron dose for aluminum and iron electrodes, with
N
and without aeration, had a strong correlation (i.e., R2 = 0.7972). The overall removal rate of
A
OP for aluminum and iron electrodes, with and without aeration, was observed to be 6.8 mg-
M
P/mmol-e. It was interesting to note that below 0.1 mmol-e/L, there appeared to be
D
insignificant OP removal with aluminum and iron electrodes. This may be due to several
TE
reasons, including aluminum and iron still being within solubility limits or the fact that
aluminum and iron hydroxides had to develop before OP was removed. Unlike the other
EP
electrode materials, magnesium electrodes had a much slower rate of OP removal per
electron moles dosed. The observed OP removal rate was only 0.9 mg-P/mmol-e (i.e., R2 =
CC
0.8255). This was almost 8 times slower than the OP removal rates observed for aluminum
A
17
PT
RI
SC
U
N
A
M
D
TE
EP
CC
A
Figure 4. Top – OP residual as a function of electron dose for aluminum and iron electrodes;
electrodes (i.e., oxygen oxidizes Fe2+(aq) to Fe3+(aq) after it is generated at the anode),
respectively, the theoretical molar ratio of metal dosed to OP removed for aluminum would
be 1.3 and for iron would be 4.1. Assuming Mg2+(aq) was produced at the anode, the molar
PT
ratio of metal dosed to OP removed was approximately 13.5. These results indicated that OP
RI
removal with magnesium electrodes was not dose dependent, since the molar ratios of
SC
phosphate are 1 and 1.5, respectively [27]. These are much lower than the observed molar
ratio of 13.5.
U
The lower OP removal rates observed for magnesium electrodes may be explained by
N
pH dependent solubility relationships – Figure 5. For instance, the pH never increased more
A
than 1 unit before the OP was completely removed with aluminum or iron electrodes. In fact,
M
the pH never rose above 8 with aluminum or iron electrodes to completely remove OP.
D
Minimum solubility of aluminum occurs at pH 6-7 [22], while minimum solubility of ferric
TE
iron occurs at pH 8 [23] and ferrous iron occurs at pH >11 [24]. Thus, aluminum electrodes
and iron electrodes, with aeration (i.e., ferric production), would have been producing metal
EP
species within the range of their minimum solubility, since pH varied from 7 to 8 for complete
CC
surface of electrodes, was likely the major removal mechanism in these cases. Due to the
A
short run time of the experiments, phosphorus precipitation on the surface of the electrodes
was not visually observed. Experiments with longer run times and probably continuous flow
would be required to asses the details of precipitation on electrodes. However, iron electrodes
19
without aeration would have been producing ferrous iron, which would not have been near
minimum solubility. Regardless, the removal of OP was not impacted by the lower solubility
PT
RI
SC
U
N
A
M
D
TE
EP
CC
A
20
PT
RI
SC
U
N
A
Figure 5. Top – pH as a function of electron dose for aluminum and iron electrodes; Bottom
M
On the other hand, complete OP removal with magnesium electrodes required a final
D
pH of 8.5-9. This may be explained by the fact that minimum solubility of magnesium occurs
TE
as pH rises above 8 [23]. Therefore, significant magnesium precipitation reactions may not
EP
have occurred until the pH rose above 8.5. It should also be noted that COD and TN removal
with magnesium electrodes also increased with pH. The maximum observed COD and TN
CC
removals with magnesium electrodes occurred at pH greater than 8.5 and were 49% and 21%,
respectively (i.e., at an electron dose of 2.3 mmol-e/L). The initial results for magnesium,
A
performed at 600 mA for 30 min (i.e., electron dose of 1.11 mmol-e/L) were 27±3% COD
21
It is interesting to note that the rate of increase in pH was similar between aluminum,
iron, and magnesium electrodes. The grouped dataset had a rate of increase in pH of 0.39 pH
units/mmol-e (i.e., R2 = 0.23). The rate of pH increase with magnesium electrodes was 0.52
PT
was comparable between aluminum, iron, and magnesium electrodes. The observed rate of
RI
increase in alkalinity with aluminum, iron, and magnesium electrodes was 11.4 mg-
CaCO3/mmol-e (i.e., R2 = 0.0592), 21.7 mg-CaCO3/mmol-e (i.e., R2 = 0.1816), and 39.6 mg-
SC
CaCO3/mmol-e (i.e., R2 = 0.5612), respectively. The similarity in pH and alkalinity trends
between all electrodes was likely a result of a single reaction dominating the cathode (i.e.,
U
Equation 9).
mA applied for 15 min followed by 45 min of settling was examined for nitrification rates at
D
20 °C and saturated dissolved oxygen – Figure 7. AUR was 1.20±0.05 mg-N/(g-VSS•h) for
TE
with iron electrodes, and 1.29±0.06 mg-N/(g-VSS•h) with magnesium electrodes. NPR was
EP
electrodes, 1.3±0.1 mg-N/(g-VSS•h) with iron electrodes, and 1.2±0.1 mg-N/(g-VSS•h) with
control and iron electrodes (i.e., P-value of 0.6782) or between the control and magnesium
nitrification rates between the control and aluminum electrodes (i.e., P-value of 0.0016).
22
Therefore, aluminum electrodes had a significant positive on nitrification rates, most likely
due to the higher COD removal by aluminum electrodes (i.e., 5 times higher than the control,
1.8 times higher than iron electrodes, 2.6 times higher than magnesium electrodes). Thus,
nitrifiers may have had less competition for oxygen while removing ammonia from the
PT
wastewater treated with aluminum electrodes [13]. Long-term studies would be required to
RI
further assess the impact of electrocoagulation during primary treatment on microbial
SC
U
N
A
M
D
TE
EP
Figure 7. AUR and NPR at 20 °C and saturated dissolved oxygen on supernatant from
CC
Settled solids from the same treatments (i.e., 200 mA applied for 15 min followed by
45 min settling) were examined for solids destruction and biogas yields under anaerobic
conditions at 35 °C – Figure 8. The solids destruction ranged from 7-15% in all cases. The
23
average volatile solids destruction for the control was observed to be 7±6%, while the average
solids destruction for treatment with aluminum electrodes was 10±15%, with iron electrodes
was 15±5%, and with magnesium electrodes was 10±10%. Although solids destruction was
higher in the samples with electrocoagulation, the difference in solids destruction between
PT
the control and any of the treatments was not statistically different (i.e., P-value = 0.3083 for
RI
aluminum, 0.0663 for iron, and 0.4613 for magnesium). Biogas yields ranged from 0.12-0.44
L/g-VSS destroyed in all cases. The average biogas yield for the control was observed to be
SC
0.4±0.4 L/g-VSS destroyed while the average biogas yield for treatment with aluminum
electrodes was 0.3± 0.4 L/g-VSS destroyed, with iron electrodes was 0.12±0.05 L/g-VSS
U
destroyed, and with magnesium electrodes was 0.2±0.2 L/g-VSS destroyed. The difference
N
in biogas yield between the control and any of the treatments were not determined to be
A
statistically different (i.e., P-value = 0.3849 for aluminum, 0.0950 for iron, and 0.9295 for
M
magnesium).
D
TE
EP
CC
A
24
Figure 8. Solids destruction and biogas yields at 35 °C on settled solids from primary influent
min settling.
4. Conclusions
PT
Electrocoagulation was used to enhance the removal of COD, TN, and TP during
RI
sedimentation. Electrocoagulation with sacrificial aluminum or iron anodes provided similar
treatment to equivalent metal doses of alum and ferric salts. The maximum observed OP
SC
removal rates with aluminum and iron electrodes were 6.8 mg-P/mmol-e. Magnesium
electrodes required higher electron doses (i.e., ~2.7 mmol-e/L) to remove equivalent amounts
U
of OP when aluminum or iron electrodes were used (i.e., 0.3 mmol-e/L). As well, the
N
maximum observed OP removal rate with magnesium electrodes was only 0.9 mg-P/mmol-
A
e, which was more than 7 times lower than the rates observed with aluminum or iron
M
electrodes. The estimated molar ratio of metal dosed to OP removed was determined to be
D
approximately 1.3 for aluminum electrodes, 4.1 for iron electrodes, and 13.5 for magnesium
TE
electrodes. While the removal of OP by aluminum and iron electrodes occurred within the
significantly higher magnesium. This was probably due to the minimum solubility of
CC
magnesium increasing as pH rises to 10.5. Thus, cathodic reactions, which raise the pH, were
likely the rate limiting step for magnesium electrodes. Thus, future studies may examine pH
A
25
nitrification rates. If electrocoagulation with iron and magnesium electrodes was optimized
for COD removal, it is possible that they would have had a positive impact on nitrification
as well.
PT
RI
SC
U
N
A
M
D
TE
EP
CC
A
26
References
[1] J. Oleszkiewicz, D. Kruk, T. Devlin, Options for improved nutrient removal and
[2] K. Daley, H. Castleden, R. Jamieson, C. Furgal, L. Ell, Water systems, sanitation, and
PT
public health risks in remote communities: Inuit resident perspectives from the
RI
Canadian Arctic, Soc. Sci. Med. 135 (2015) 124–132.
doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.04.017.
SC
[3] M. Anda, K. Mathew, G. Ho, Evapotranspiration for domestic wastewater reuse in
U
[4] N. Ashbolt, Microbial contamination of drinking water and disease outcomes in
N
developing regions, Toxicology. 198 (2004) 229–238.
A
[5] A. Prüss, L. Fewtrell, J. Bartam, Estimating the burden of diseases from water,
M
sanitation, and hygeine at a global level, Envrionmental Heal. Perspect. 110 (2002)
D
537–542.
TE
[6] Environment Canada, The state of municipal wastewater effluents in Canada, 2001.
[7] G.E. Üstün, Occurrence and removal of metals in urban wastewater treatment plants,
EP
[8] M.I. Badawy, R.A. Wahaab, A.S. El-Kalliny, Fenton-biological treatment processes
for the removal of some pharmaceuticals from industrial wastewater, J. Hazard. Mater.
A
[9] J.H. Chang, T.J. Yang, C.H. Tung, Performance of nano- and nonnano-catalytic
27
152–157. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.06.072.
doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.06.057.
PT
[11] R. Gupta, V.K. Garg, Stabilization of primary sewage sludge during vermicomposting,
RI
J. Hazard. Mater. 153 (2008) 1023–1030. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.09.055.
[12] S. Chen, N. Li, B. Dong, W. Zhao, L. Dai, X. Dai, New insights into the enhanced
SC
performance of high solid anaerobic digestion with dewatered sludge by thermal
U
342 (2018) 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.08.012.
N
[13] J.M. Gálvez, M.A. Gómez, E. Hontoria, J. González-López, Influence of hydraulic
A
loading and air flowrate on urban wastewater nitrogen removal with a submerged
M
3894(03)00173-0.
TE
[14] H. Carrère, C. Dumas, A. Battimelli, D.J. Batstone, J.P. Delgenès, J.P. Steyer, I.
163–169. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.09.032.
[16] M.Y. Mollah, R. Schennach, J.R. Parga, D.L. Cocke, Electrocoagulation (EC)--
28
3894(01)00176-5.
PT
soluble phosphorus from surface water using iron (Fe-Fe) and aluminum (Al-Al)
RI
Electrodes, Environ. Sci. Technol. 51 (2017). doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b02353.
[19] B. Zhang, B. Sun, M. Ji, H. Liu, Population dynamic succession and quantification of
SC
ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in a membrane bioreactor treating municipal wastewater,
U
[20] D.J. Kruk, M. Elektorowicz, J.A. Oleszkiewicz, Struvite precipitation and phosphorus
N
removal using magnesium sacrificial anode, Chemosphere. 101 (2014) 28–33.
A
doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.12.036.
M
[21] APHA, AWWA, WEF, Standard methods for the examination of water & wastewater,
D
emulsions using aluminium plate electrodes, J. Hazard. Mater. 152 (2008) 423–430.
EP
doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.06.121.
CC
[24] B. Morgan, O. Lahav, The effect of pH on the kinetics of spontaneous Fe(II) oxidation
29
Chemosphere. 68 (2007) 2080–2084. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.02.015.
[26] B. Li, S. Irvin, The comparison of alkalinity and ORP as indicators for nitrification
PT
and denitrification in a sequencing batch reactor (SBR), Biochem. Eng. J. 34 (2007)
RI
248–255. doi:10.1016/j.bej.2006.12.020.
[27] D.C. Pedemonte, J.M. Garrido, Struvite crystallization versus amorphous magnesium
SC
and calcium phosphate precipitation during the treatment of a saline industrial
U
N
A
M
D
TE
EP
CC
A
30
A
CC
EP
TE
D
M
A
N
U
SC
RI
31
PT