Nonsurgical Jawline Rejuvenation Using Injectable Fillers
Nonsurgical Jawline Rejuvenation Using Injectable Fillers
Nonsurgical Jawline Rejuvenation Using Injectable Fillers
DOI: 10.1111/jocd.13277
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Aria Vazirnia MD, MAS1 | André Braz MD2 | Sabrina G. Fabi MD, FAAD, FAACS3
1
Department of Dermatology,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Abstract
MA, USA Background: A well-defined jawline is a critical component in the perception of facial
2
Dermatology Division, Policlínica Geral do
attractiveness in both men and women. Dermal fillers offer a nonsurgical, temporary
Rio de Janeiro (PGRJ), Rio de Janiero, Brazil
3
Cosmetic Laser Dermatology, La Jolla, CA,
method of correcting mild-to-moderate mandibular bone resorption.
USA Aims: The authors discuss pertinent aspects of anatomy, pathophysiology of aging,
Correspondence
patient evaluation, gender considerations, injection technique, and complications in
Aria Vazirnia, MD, MAS, Department of jawline augmentation using injectable fillers.
Dermatology, Massachusetts General
Hospital, 50 Staniford St #250, Boston, MA
Methods: A brief review of the literature surrounding jawline augmentation using
02114, USA. injectable fillers in both men and women, as well as the authors’ experience in this
Email: [email protected]
area, is provided.
Funding information
Results: Nonsurgical jawline augmentation using injectable fillers can be performed
Dr Aria Vazirnia has no conflicts of interest
to disclose. Dr André Braz is an advisor & effectively and safely with adequate background knowledge of the regional anatomy
speaker for Allergan and Merz. Dr Sabrina
and appropriate patient selection. The authors discuss both injection techniques in the
Fabi is an investigator, advisor & speaker for
Allergan, Galderma, and Merz. published literature and their own approach. Potential complications are also reviewed.
Conclusion: Jawline rejuvenation is a key component to global facial aesthetic reju-
venation. Therefore, it is important for physicians to understand how to safely and
effectively perform nonsurgical jawline rejuvenation using injectable fillers.
KEYWORDS
1 | I NTRO D U C TI O N volume and structural support.1,2 There is a shift in the 3-dimen-
sional structure of the face resulting from subcutaneous fat redistri-
The jawline is integral to the perception of attractiveness and facial bution and atrophy as well as skeletal remodeling and resorption.3,4
youth, as well as key to defining masculine vs feminine facial features. In the lower face, age-associated resorption of the mandibular
The aging face is a function of facial volume loss, resulting from a com- bone and the gravitational descent of the superficial mid-facial fat
bination of bony resorption, fat repositioning, and tissue laxity.1 In the compartments result in loss of the youthful jawline definition with
lower face, this age-associated volume loss leads to loss of definition of ptosis of the skin, jowling, and formation of prominent Marionette
the jawline.2 Therefore, a comprehensive approach to facial rejuvena- lines.1,2,5,6 Blunting of the jawline is worsened by the downward pull
tion should include an evaluation of the jawline in both men and women. of the depressor labii inferioris, depressor anguli oris, and platys-
mal muscle fibers, which find resting tone on resorbing mandibular
bone.3,7
2 | LOS S O F JAW LI N E D E FI N ITI O N & To combat the signs of aging and help restore a more youthful
J OW L FO R M ATI O N appearance, multiple nonsurgical techniques have been utilized to
improve skin texture, skin laxity, and underlying volume and struc-
Facial aging is a multifactorial process that reflects gradual changes tural support. Ablative and nonablative lasers, microfocused ultra-
in skin texture, soft tissue volume and elasticity, and underlying bone sound, and subsurface monopolar radiofrequency have been shown
(A)
(B)
(C)
VAZIRNIA et al. |
3
F I G U R E 3 Cadaveric dissections showing the vasculature of the lower face. The facial artery and facial vein cross the mandible anterior
to the masseter muscle and are located in the deep fat, deep to the platysma (A & B). The masseteric veins (C)
of the gland and then runs in between the masseter muscle and the injectable fillers. Special focus should be given to the prominence
parotideo-masseteric fascia. At the anterior border of the masseter, of the mandibular angle, jawline, chin projection and length, prejowl
the parotid duct then passes through the buccinator muscle where it sulcus, and Marionette line. 21 There should be awareness of impor-
18-20
then enters the oral cavity. tant neurovascular and anatomical structures near injection sites,
which include the facial artery and vein, the marginal mandibular
nerve, the parotid gland and duct, and the masseter muscle. 21
4 | E VA LUATI O N Patients should be examined at rest and in animation while in
an upright position.6 The examiner should have flexibility in mov-
As with most facial rejuvenation procedures, it is important to ing around the patient to analyze the face from different angles. 21
conduct a careful aesthetic evaluation of the patient prior to using Photographs at baseline and after treatment should be taken at the
VAZIRNIA et al. |
5
F I G U R E 5 Supraperiosteal injection
at the inferoposterior aspect of the
mandibular angle in a patient (A) and
cadaveric section (B). In the cadaveric
section (B), note the location of the
parotid gland, parotid duct, and masseter
muscle in relation to the injection point
anterior, oblique, and lateral positions. Validated scales, such as the men have a bizygomatic to bigonial distance that is approximately 1:1,
Merz Jawline Grading Scale and the Global Aesthetic Improvement a youthful woman's face is characterized by the inverted “triangle of
Scale, may be used to evaluate the jawline and objectively assess youth,” with a bizygomatic distance that is wider than the bigonial dis-
treatment efficacy. 22,23 tance (Figure 4). In women, this is considered the ideal and should be
The aesthetic goal in jawline rejuvenation is to straighten the jaw- maintained to avoid masculinizing the female face.24
line, to smooth the transition between the mentum and the jowls, and As with other cosmetic procedures, it is important to set realistic
to lift the jowls upwards and posteriorly.18 However, gender differ- expectations of results with patients. Jawline rejuvenation with in-
ences must be taken into account. The aesthetic endpoint in men and jectable fillers may not achieve the same results as a surgical neck or
women differ in that the male jaw is more angular and more prominent face lift procedure, and therefore there should be a discussion about
than that in women.2,18 Other masculine facial features include a wider combination procedures with monopolar radiofrequency, microfo-
interorbital distance, wider nose, more prominent mental subunit, cused ultrasound, and laser devices in those who prefer noninvasive
thicker and lower-positioned eyebrows, and thinner lips.24,25 While treatment modalities.18
|
6 VAZIRNIA et al.
Fillers used for jawline rejuvenation include hyaluronic acid (HA), cal-
cium hydroxylapatite (CaHA), poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA), and autologous
fat.6,18 The authors recommend use of HA or CaHA fillers (Juvederm
Voluma XC, Allergan, Inc; Restylane Lyft; Galderma SA; Radiesse (+),
Merz North America, Inc) due to the stiffer gel characteristics of
these products that allow them to provide more structure along the
jaw. Of note, Juvederm Voluma XC has less elasticity and viscosity than
Restylane Lyft and Radiesse (+) yet is more significantly cross-linked.
It is important to thoroughly cleanse the face with an antiseptic
preparation that extends below the jawline and onto the preauricu-
lar region. The authors begin with a supraperiosteal depot injection
of HA or CaHA filler at the inferoposterior aspect of the mandibular
angle (Figure 5), followed by small 0.1 mL-0.2 mL supraperiosteal ali-
quots injected superiorly along the ramus of the mandible. Aspiration
is recommended to avoid intravascular injection. In female patients,
a blunt-tipped 22-gauge, 1.5-inch cannula is then used to create a
sweep along the mandibular angle that has now been augmented
to the earlobe, within the subdermal plane to avoid injection into
the parotid (Figure 6). The cannula entry point is 4 cm medial to the
mandibular angle (as the facial artery and vein are ~3 cm medial or
anterior to the mandibular angle). In male patients, the cannula is not
directed toward the earlobe but superiorly directed in the direction
F I G U R E 7 Authors' injection strategy for fillers along the male
of the ramus from the mandibular angle to create a squarer, angular
jawline, where larger dots indicate larger depots supraperiosteally
appearance (Figure 7). A blunt-tipped 22-gauge, 1.5-inch cannula along the mandibular angle and up the ramus, black arrows indicate
is used to deposit product in the subcutaneous plane, immediately linear threads of product in the subdermal plane and broken arrows
subdermal, as there are many veins that course over the masseter. indicate the optional placement of product in the subdermal
From the same entry point along the jawline, the cannula can be di- plane in men to widen the jawline and add to a more masculine
appearance (maintaining a bizygomatic distance that is the same as
rected anteriorly in both men and women. Special care should be
the bigonial distance)
taken to avoid broadening the jaw in a woman by avoiding placing
filler over the masseter, which is more of an aesthetic endpoint in
the male face (Figure 8). However, to masculinize and widen the male
face, filler can be placed subdermally over the masseter with caution glabella, nasal bridge, and nasolabial folds, yet filler-induced vascular
to avoid inadvertent injection into the parotid gland or facial vein.6,18 injury can occur anywhere on the face.18,26 At the onset of any warning
sign of vascular occlusion, the practitioner should immediately infiltrate
the area of pending necrosis with injectable hyaluronidase, apply warm
6 | CO M PLI C ATI O N S compresses, and consider administering aspirin, topical nitroglycerin,
hyperbaric oxygen, and/or low molecular weight heparin.18,26 Aside
The most common complications from nonsurgical rejuvenation of from vascular injury, superficial injections over the masseter muscle
the jawline with injectable fillers include redness, bruising, ten- carry risk of injury to the parotid gland and duct. Trauma to the parotid
1,5
derness, and swelling. Other potential complications, although gland may result in infection or injury to branches of the facial nerve
rarer, include infection and foreign body granuloma formation. running through the gland.5,6 Injury to the parotid duct may result in
Granulomas can develop months to years after the original injec- infection, ductal obstruction, mucocele formation, and/or or salivary
tion.1 Although the subdermal plane along the jawline is relatively fistulas.27 No intravascular occlusion, infection, granuloma formation,
free of important neurovascular structures, the facial artery and or parotid gland/duct injury has been experienced by patients using
vein as well as the marginal mandibular nerve traverse the lower the “Authors’ Technique” as described above.
border of the mandible supraperiosteally; therefore, it is impor-
tant to be aware of the dangers of vascular occlusion with intra-
vascular injection of filler. 5 7 | CO N C LU S I O N
Intravascular injection of filler results in pain and blanching along
the distribution of the artery, which leads to tissue ischemia, necro- Use of injectable dermal fillers is an effective nonsurgical treatment
sis, and rarely stroke and blindness.18,26 High-risk areas include the modality in jawline rejuvenation. Treatments may be combined with
VAZIRNIA et al. |
7
other noninvasive modalities, such as neuromodulators, radiofre- 8. Dendle J, Wu DC, Fabi SG, Melo D, Goldman MP. A retrospective
evaluation of subsurface monopolar radiofrequency for lifting of
quency devices, and ultrasound devices, to not only improve con-
the face, neck, and jawline. Dermatol Surg. 2016;42(11):1261-1265.
touring but also skin laxity and tone. 28 9. Meland M, Groppi C, Lorenc ZP. Rheological properties of cal-
cium hydroxylapatite with integral lidocaine. J Drugs Dermatol.
ORCID 2016;15(9):1107-1110.
10. Lee HJ, Won SY, O J, et al. The facial artery: a comprehensive ana-
Aria Vazirnia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5421-7323
tomical review. Clin Anat. 2018:99-108.
11. Markiewicz MR, Ord R, Fernandes RP. 43 - local and regional flap
REFERENCES reconstruction of maxillofacial defects. In: Brennan PA, Schliephake
1. Dallara JM, Baspeyras M, Bui P, Cartier H, Charavel MH, Dumas H, Ghali GE, Cascarini L, eds. Maxillofacial surgery (Third Edition).
L. Calcium hydroxylapatite for jawline rejuvenation: consensus rec- London, UK:Churchill Livingstone; 2017:616-635.
ommendations. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2014;13(1):3-14. 12. Sykes JM, Suárez GA, Trevidic P, Cotofana S, Moon HJ. Chapter 2 -
2. Baspeyras M, Dallara JM, Cartier H, Charavel MH, Dumas L. applied facial anatomy. In: Azizzadeh B, Murphy MR, Johnson CM,
Restoring jawline contour with calcium hydroxylapatite: a prospec- Massry GG, Fitzgerald R, eds. Master techniques in facial rejuvena-
tive, observational study. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2017;16(3):342-347. tion (Second Edition). London, UK:Elsevier; 2018:6-14.
3. Coleman SR, Grover R. The anatomy of the aging face: volume 13. Kenkel JM, Jones DH, Fagien S, et al. Anatomy of the cervicomental
loss and changes in 3-dimensional topography. Aesthetic Surg J. region: insights from an anatomy laboratory and roundtable discus-
2006;26(1_Supplement):S4-S9. sion. Dermatol Surg. 2016;42(Suppl 1):S282-S287.
4. Cohen SR, Womack H. Injectable tissue replacement and regener- 14. Baker DC, Conley J. Avoiding facial nerve injuries in rhytidec-
ation: anatomic fat grafting to restore decayed facial tissues. Plast tomy. Anatomical variations and pitfalls. Plast Reconstr Surg.
Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019;7(8):e2293. 1979;64(6):781-795.
5. Juhasz MLW, Marmur ES. Examining the efficacy of calcium hy- 15. Dingman RO, Grabb WC. Surgical anatomy of the mandibular ramus
droxylapatite filler with integral lidocaine in correcting volume loss of the facial nerve based on the dissection of 100 facial halves. Plast
of the jawline-a pilot study. Dermatol Surg. 2018;44(8):1084-1093. Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull. 1962;29:266-272.
6. Vanaman Wilson MJ, Jones IT, Butterwick K, Fabi SG. Role of non- 16. Van Sickels JE. Management of parotid gland and duct injuries. Oral
surgical chin augmentation in full face rejuvenation: a review and Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2009;21(2):243-246.
our experience. Dermatol Surg. 2018;44(7):985-993. 17. Almukhtar RM, Fabi SG. The masseter muscle and its role in fa-
7. Suwanchinda A, Rudolph C, Hladik C, et al. The layered anatomy of cial contouring, aging, and quality of life: a literature review. Plast
the jawline. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2018;17(4):625-631. Reconstr Surg. 2019;143(1):39e-48e.
|
8 VAZIRNIA et al.
18. Braz A, Humphrey S, Weinkle S, et al. Lower face: clinical anatomy 25. Mitteroecker P, Windhager S, Muller GB, Schaefer K. The
and regional approaches with injectable fillers. Plast Reconstr Surg. morphometrics of "masculinity" in human faces. PLoS One.
2015;136(5 Suppl):235s-257s. 2015;10(2):e0118374.
19. Marur T, Tuna Y, Demirci S. Facial anatomy. Clin Dermatol. 26. Yeh LC, Fabi SG, Welsh K. Arterial penetration with blunt-tipped
2014;32(1):14-23. cannulas using injectables: a false sense of safety? ,Dermatol Surg.
20. Lee JY, Kim JN, Yoo JY, et al. Topographic anatomy of the mas- 2017;43(3):464-467.
seter muscle focusing on the tendinous digitation. Clin Anat. 27. Steinberg MJ, Herrera AF. Management of parotid duct injuries. Oral
2012;25(7):889-892. Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;99(2):136-141.
21. Moradi A, Watson J. Current concepts in filler injection. Facial Plast 28. Vanaman M, Fabi SG, Cox SE. Neck rejuvenation using a combi-
Surg Clin North Am. 2015;23(4):489-494. nation approach: our experience and a review of the literature.
22. Jones DM, Moradi A, Narins R, Narurkar V, Flynn T, Verma A. Dermatol Surg. 2016;42(Suppl 2):S94-S100.
Development and reliability of a new merz jawline grading scale
for photographic and live assessments. J Am Acad Dermatol.
2017;76(6):AB98.
How to cite this article: Vazirnia A, Braz A, Fabi SG.
23. Corduff N. The 12-point revitalization guide to pan-facial applica-
Nonsurgical jawline rejuvenation using injectable fillers. J
tion of injectable fillers in older women. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol.
2018;11(8):35-40. Cosmet Dermatol. 2019;00:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/
24. Frisenda JL, Nassif PS. Correction of the lower face and neck. Facial jocd.13277
Plast Surg. 2018;34(5):480-487.