Grab Breaking Load and Elongation of Geotextiles: Standard Test Method For
Grab Breaking Load and Elongation of Geotextiles: Standard Test Method For
Grab Breaking Load and Elongation of Geotextiles: Standard Test Method For
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
--``,,`,``,`,`,,,``,`,,`,```,,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
or constant-rate-of-extension (CRE) type tension machines. 8.1.1 Reliable Estimate of v—When there is a reliable
However, there may be no overall correlation between the estimate of v based upon extensive past records for similar
results obtained with the CRT machine and the CRE machine. materials tested in the user’s laboratory as directed in the
Consequently, these two tension testers cannot be used inter- method, calculate the required number of specimens using Eq
changeably. In case of controversy, the CRE machine shall 1, as follows:
prevail. n 5 ~ tv/A ! 2
(1)
--``,,`,``,`,`,,,``,`,,`,```,,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
NOTE 1—It is recognized that in practice geotextile materials are
frequently not weighed to determine when moisture equilibrium has been the result falls markedly below the average for the set of
reached. While such a procedure cannot be accepted in cases of dispute, specimens, discard the result and take another specimen.
it may be sufficient in routine testing to expose the material to the standard Continue this procedure until the required number of accept-
atmosphere for testing for a reasonable period of time before the able breaks have been obtained.
specimens are tested. A time of at least 24 h has been found acceptable in
most cases. However, certain fibers may exhibit slow moisture equaliza- NOTE 2—The decision to discard a break shall be based on observation
tion rates from the “as received” wet side. When this is known, a of the specimen during the test and upon the inherent variability of the
preconditioning cycle, as described in Practice D1776/D1776M, may be fabric. In the absence of other criteria for rejecting a so-called jaw break,
agreed upon between contractual parties. any break occurring within 5 mm [1⁄4 in.] of the jaws which results in a
value below 80 % of the average of all the other breaks shall be discarded.
No other break shall be discarded unless it is known to be faulty.
TABLE 1 Values of Student’s t for One-Sided Limits NOTE 3—It is difficult to determine the precise reason for breakage of
and the 95 % ProbabilityA test specimens near the edge of the jaws. If breaks are caused by damage
to the specimen by the jaws, then the results should be discarded. If,
df One- df One- df One-
Sided Sided sided
however, they are merely due to randomly distributed weak places in
specimens, the results should be considered perfectly legitimate. In some
1 6.314 11 1.796 22 1.717
cases, breaks may be caused by a concentration of stress in the area
2 2.920 12 1.782 24 1.711
3 2.353 13 1.771 26 1.706
adjacent to the jaws. If this occurs, the specimen is prevented from
4 2.132 14 1.761 28 1.701 contracting in width as the load is applied. In such cases, a break near the
5 2.015 15 1.753 30 1.697 edge of the jaws is inevitable and shall be accepted as a characteristic of
6 1.943 16 1.746 40 1.684 the geotextile when tested by this test method.
7 1.895 17 1.740 50 1.676
8 1.860 18 1.734 60 1.671
10.5 Start the tensile testing machine and the area measur-
9 1.833 19 1.729 120 1.658 ing device, if used, and continue running the test to rupture.
10 1.812 20 1.725 1.645 Stop the machine and reset to the initial gage position. Record
A
Values in this table were calculated using Hewlett Packard HP 67/97 Users’ and report the test results for each direction separately.
Library Programs 03848D, “One-Sided and Two-Sided Critical Values of Stu-
dent’s t” and 00350D, “Improved Normal and Inverse Distribution.” For values at 10.6 If fabric manifests slippage in the jaws, the jaw faces,
other than the 95 % probability level, see published tables of critical values of but not the jaw dimensions, may be modified. If a modification
Student’s t in any standard statistical text. Further use of this table is defined in
Practice D2905. is used, the method of modification should be stated in the
report.
--``,,`,``,`,`,,,``,`,,`,```,,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
uct(s) sampled and the method of sampling used. 13.1.3 The above terms (repeatability limit and reproduc-
12.1.2 The average grab breaking load for specimens cut in ibility limit) are used as specified in Practice E177.
each direction, for all specimens giving acceptable breaks. 13.1.4 Any judgment in accordance with statements 13.1.1
12.1.3 The average grab percent apparent elongation of and 13.1.2 would have an approximate 95 % probability of
specimens cut in each direction, for all specimens giving being correct.
acceptable breaks, if required. Identify this as “apparent
13.2 Bias—At the time of the study, there was no accepted
breaking elongation,” or “apparent elongation at x lb load,” as
reference material suitable for determining the bias for this test
required by the test specifications.
method, therefore no statement on bias is being made.
12.1.4 Number of specimens tested in each direction.
12.1.5 Condition of specimens (wet or dry).
12.1.6 Type of testing machine used. 4
Supporting data have been filed at ASTM International Headquarters and may
12.1.7 Maximum load obtainable in the range used for be obtained by requesting Research Report RR:D35-1021. Contact ASTM Customer
testing. Service at [email protected].
13.3 The precision statement was determined through sta- 13.4 To judge the equivalency of two test results, it is
tistical examination of 240 reported results, from ten recommended to choose the material closest in characteristics
laboratories, on four materials. These four materials were to the test material.
identified as the following:
Woven Slit Tape Stabilization Geotextile
Light Weight Nonwoven Geotextile
Heavy Weight Nonwoven Geotextile
Woven Mono/Slit Tape Reinforcement Geotextile
ASTM International takes no position respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with any item mentioned
in this standard. Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the risk
of infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility.
This standard is subject to revision at any time by the responsible technical committee and must be reviewed every five years and
if not revised, either reapproved or withdrawn. Your comments are invited either for revision of this standard or for additional standards
and should be addressed to ASTM International Headquarters. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the
responsible technical committee, which you may attend. If you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you should
make your views known to the ASTM Committee on Standards, at the address shown below.
This standard is copyrighted by ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959,
United States. Individual reprints (single or multiple copies) of this standard may be obtained by contacting ASTM at the above
address or at 610-832-9585 (phone), 610-832-9555 (fax), or [email protected] (e-mail); or through the ASTM website
(www.astm.org). Permission rights to photocopy the standard may also be secured from the Copyright Clearance Center, 222
Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, Tel: (978) 646-2600; http://www.copyright.com/
--``,,`,``,`,`,,,``,`,,`,```,,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---