KTB-QA-013-V01 Data Analysis Procedure

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 6

Data Analysis Procedure

KTB-QA-013-V01

Prepared by: QHSE Manager Issue Date: 02.07.2013


Elmar Sultanov

Reviewed by: HR &Admin Manager Next Revision Date: 02.07.2014


Asker Hasanov

Approved by: Director, Revision: A


Idris Musayev

UNCONTROLLED IF PRINTED
Title: Data Analysis Page: 2 of 4
Rev: A
Doc Number: KTB-QA-013-V-01 Date: 02 July 2013

Amendments History
Rev Date Description
B 28.10.2013 Clause 3.0 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

TABLE OF CONTENT

1.0 PURPOSE ........................................................................................................................................ 3


2.0 SCOPE.............................................................................................................................................. 3
3.0 DEFINITIONS .................................................................................................................................. 3
4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES....................................................................................................................... 3
5.0 PROCEDURE .................................................................................................................................. 3
5.1 Process Overview Table.......................................................................................................... 3
6.0 MANAGEMENT REVIEW.............................................................................................................. 5

UNCONTROLLED IF PRINTED
Title: Data Analysis Page: 3 of 4
Rev: A
Doc Number: KTB-QA-013-V-01 Date: 02 July 2013

1.0 PURPOSE
The purpose of this procedure is to provide a process to identify gaps and areas for improvement in the company
Integrated Management System through analyzing performance indicators.

2.0 SCOPE

This document applies across all KTB activities and describes the process for obtaining, reporting, recording,
managing performance data.

3.0 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

ISO 9001:2008 – Quality Management System, clause 8.4 Analysis of data.

4.0 DEFINITIONS

CI: Continual Improvement


TRC: Total Recordable Cases
DAFWC: Day Away From work Case
SVAR: Severe Vehicle Accident Rate
TVAR: Total Vehicle Accident Rate
BOSS: Behavioral Observation Safety System
SOC: Safety Observations Conversation

5.0 RESPONSIBILITIES

It is the responsibility of the Business Development Manager to comply with the relevant section of this procedure
and conduct Supplier Satisfaction and Complaints Data Analysis
It is responsibility of the QHSE Manager to comply with the relevant section of this procedure and conduct HSE
and Quality Data Analysis;
It is responsibility of the Human Resources Coordinator to comply with the relevant section of this procedure
and conduct Human Resources and Training Data Analysis;
It is responsibility of the Procurement Officer to comply with the relevant section of this procedure and conduct
Supplier Evaluation Data Analysis;

6.0 PROCEDURE

5.1 Process Overview Table


Performance indicators to be analyzed and responsible departments are show in Table 1 below:

7.0 MANAGEMENT REVIEW

Data analysis shall be discussed at the monthly management meeting and the progress of corrective or
preventative actions followed.

END OF PROCEDURE

UNCONTROLLED IF PRINTED
Title: Data Analysis Page: 4 of 4
Rev: A
Doc Number: KTB-QA-013-V-01 Date: 02 July 2013

Table 1. Performance indicators to be analyzed and responsible departments

Data Analysis Ownership by


# Frequency Methodology Particular Data Required
Item Department

1. Total number of completed Customer Satisfaction Questionnaires


Customer Business Analysis of Customer 2. Overall average score – improvement or reduction
1 Annual 3. Main client comments/suggestions for improvement
Satisfaction Development Satisfaction Questionnaires

Analysis and review of


1. Total number of customer complains, breakdown per processes / department
Customer Business customer complaints (any
2 Quarterly 2. Effectiveness in closeout of actions established as result of review customer
Complains Development received by phone, e-mail,
complaints within target date.
verbal, non-conformance)

1. Effectiveness (in % per department; total) in closeout of actions established as a


Internal Audits result of audits (Level 1, 2, 3) within target date.
2. Compliance to established annual audit plan

1. Overall compliance of legal and other requirements (in %)


Legal Compliance
3 Quality QHSE Quarterly 2. Compliance of legal and other requirements per department (in %)

1. Categories of raised continual improvement: occurrence, suggestion/improvement,


Continual Improvement
commendation (in %)
System
2. Effectiveness of close out of CI within period established by procedure (in %)

1. Lagging indicators: TRC & DAWFC frequencies, First Aid, SVAR & TVAR. Actual and
Target
Analysis of monthly HSE 2. Leading indicators: BOSS, SOC, Safety Meetings, Near Miss reported, Training
4 HSE QHSE Monthly
performance Hours (including Safety Meetings, Trainings, Drills, Exercises etc.).
3. SOC / BOSS Categorisation (break down in Percentage),
4. Pollution incidents and Prevention initiatives.

Review of employees Review of employees absenteeism, dynamics of increased sick leaves, comparison with
Human absenteeism previous month, average days on sick leave
Resources,
5 HR Monthly
Training and Review of trainings provided Training matrix compliance in %
Competency
Employee complaints Total number of employees complaints, their categorisation (in %), solving in time (in %)

Analysis of purchased items


Items (services) that were not delivered in agreed timescale (total % of all items)
delivery time
6 Supplier
Procurement Quarterly
Evaluation Analysis rejection of
Number of purchased items (services) rejected (total % of all items)
purchased items

UNCONTROLLED IF PRINTED

You might also like