Flex Master
Flex Master
Flex Master
FlexMasters NiTi files have been in successful application for some years, not only in Germany but also worldwide,
and their use is becoming increasingly widespread. The cutting blade design of K-type files provides for efficient
working and effective removal of dentinal debris. Due to their convex cross-sectional profile, these instruments are
moreover equipped with a more solid instrument core which reduces the risk of fractures and deformations.
FlexMasters instruments are among the most comprehensively investigated rotary NiTi instruments. Very good
results have been reported both in numerous in vitro studies and in an in vivo setting. The present article elucidates
and assesses both the scientific setting and the clinical aspects of the system.
183
Sonntag
184
FlexMaster
Conclusions
Curved root canals can be prepared without difficulty
with FM NiTi instruments by both experienced
Fig. 5. Same as Fig. 4. practitioners and by novices. In particular the positive
results of numerous studies with inexperienced opera-
torque limit provides adequate warning before wed- tors demonstrate that this system is simple and user-
ging in the canal occurs. As a result, the automatic friendly.
reverse function with acoustic signal on reaching the
programmed resistance value is only seldom required. Further Reading
Both features are helpful in avoiding fractures and
enhance the safety of an instrument considerably. 1. Barthel CR, Gruber S, Roulet JF. A new method to assess
In addition to the preprogrammed file sequences for the results of instrumentation techniques in the root
large, medium and narrow canals, the motor offers canal. J Endod 1999: 25: 535–538.
individually programmable sequences with instruments 2. Chanteaux M, Baumann-Giedziella UA, Hellmich M,
Baumann MA. Cleaning and shaping efficiency of
from different manufacturers. FlexMasters evaluated by SEM. Int Endod J 2001: 35:
99 (abstract R 60).
3. Hübscher W, Barbakow F, Peters OA. Root canal
preparation with FlexMaster: assessment of torque and
Recent findings with FM force in relation to canal anatomy. Int Endod J 2003: 36:
883–890.
FM instruments are among the most comprehensively 4. Hübscher W, Barbakow F, Peters OA. Root-canal
investigated rotary NiTi instruments. Very good results preparation with FlexMaster: canal shapes analysed by
185
Sonntag
micro-computed tomography. Int Endod J 2003: 36: 9. Sonntag D, Delschen S, Stachniss V. Root-canal shaping
740–747. with manual and rotary Ni–Ti files performed by
5. Hülsmann M, Gressmann G, Schäfers F. A comparative students. Int Endod J 2003: 36: 715–723.
study of root canal preparation using FlexMaster and 10. Sonntag D, Guntermann A, Kim SK, Stachniss V. Root
HERO 642 rotary Ni–Ti instruments. Int Endod J 2003: canal shaping with manual stainless steel files and rotary
36: 358–366. Ni–Ti files performed by students. Int Endod J 2003: 36:
6. Schäfer E, Lohmann D. Efficiency of rotary nickel– 246–255.
titanium FlexMaster instruments compared with stainless 11. Sonntag D, Kook K, Hannig M, Stachniss V. Clinical
steel hand K-Flexofile – Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and study of root canal preparation during undergraduate
instrumentation results in severely curved root canals of dental training 2005, in press.
extracted teeth. Int Endod J 2002: 35: 514–521. 12. Turpin YL, Chagneau F, Vulcain JM. Impact of two
7. Schäfer E, Lohmann D. Efficiency of rotary nickel- theoretical cross-sections on torsional and bending
titanium FlexMaster instruments compared with stainless stresses of nickel–titanium root canal instrument models.
steel hand K-Flexofile – Part 1. Shaping ability in J Endod 2000: 26: 414–417.
simulated curved canals. Int Endod J 2002: 35: 505–513. 13. Weiger R, Bruckner M, ElAyouti A, Löst C. Preparation
8. Schäfer E, Schulz-Bongert U, Tulus G. Comparison of of curved root canals with rotary FlexMaster instruments
hand stainless steel and nickel titanium rotary instru- compared to Lightspeed instruments and NiTi hand
mentation: a clinical study. J Endod 2004: 30: 432–435. files. Int Endod J 2003: 36: 483–490.
186