Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    Project Criteria

    Uploaded by

    Ehsas Alward
    This document outlines the criteria that will be used to assess projects for Dr. Farah Bahrouni's fall 2023 course. It includes 9 criteria rated on a scale from 1-5: research question/objectives, literature review, methodology, data collection, discussion/conclusion, organization/clarity, writing quality, references/citations, and a total score out of 50. Descriptors are provided for scores of 5 (excellent), 4 (good), 3 (satisfactory), 2 (needs improvement), and 1 (inadequate).

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Project Criteria

    Uploaded by

    Ehsas Alward
    5 views2 pages
    This document outlines the criteria that will be used to assess projects for Dr. Farah Bahrouni's fall 2023 course. It includes 9 criteria rated on a scale from 1-5: research question/objectives, literature review, methodology, data collection, discussion/conclusion, organization/clarity, writing quality, references/citations, and a total score out of 50. Descriptors are provided for scores of 5 (excellent), 4 (good), 3 (satisfactory), 2 (needs improvement), and 1 (inadequate).

    Original Description:

    How to assess project

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document outlines the criteria that will be used to assess projects for Dr. Farah Bahrouni's fall 2023 course. It includes 9 criteria rated on a scale from 1-5: research question/objectives, literature review, methodology, data collection, discussion/conclusion, organization/clarity, writing quality, references/citations, and a total score out of 50. Descriptors are provided for scores of 5 (excellent), 4 (good), 3 (satisfactory), 2 (needs improvement), and 1 (inadequate).

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    5 views2 pages

    Project Criteria

    Uploaded by

    Ehsas Alward
    This document outlines the criteria that will be used to assess projects for Dr. Farah Bahrouni's fall 2023 course. It includes 9 criteria rated on a scale from 1-5: research question/objectives, literature review, methodology, data collection, discussion/conclusion, organization/clarity, writing quality, references/citations, and a total score out of 50. Descriptors are provided for scores of 5 (excellent), 4 (good), 3 (satisfactory), 2 (needs improvement), and 1 (inadequate).

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    UoN-CAS-DFL

    Fall 2023- Project Assessment Criteria – Dr. Farah Bahrouni


    Criteria Excellent (5) Good (4) Satisfactory (3) Needs Inadequate (1)
    Improvement (2)
    Research Clearly defined and Well-defined research Adequate research Vague or unclear Absent or completely
    Qs/Objectives focused research question or objective question or objective, but research question or unclear research question
    question(s) or with clear relevance may lack precision objective or objective
    objective(s) with
    relevance to the area at
    hand

    Literature Review Comprehensive literature Good literature review Adequate literature Superficial or Absent or completely
    review demonstrating a with a clear synthesis of review, but may lack incomplete literature inadequate literature
    deep understanding of relevant theories and depth or miss some key review review
    relevant theories and research sources
    previous research

    Methodology Rigorous/Accurate and Sound research design Adequate research Methodology is weak or Inadequate or completely
    well-justified research with appropriate design, but with some lacks clear justification inappropriate
    design, including justification gaps in justification methodology
    sampling, data
    collection, and analysis
    methods

    Data Collection Thorough and well- Good data collection Adequate data collection, Data collection methods Inadequate or completely
    executed data collection methods with some room but with noticeable flaws are weak, leading to flawed data collection
    methods, ensuring for improvement in affecting reliability and significant issues in
    reliability and validity reliability and validity validity reliability and validity

    Discussion & Well-developed Good discussion linking Adequate discussion, but Superficial or disjointed Inadequate or completely
    Conclusion discussion, connecting findings to the research may lack some discussion. Conclusion is absent discussion and
    findings to the research question and literature. connections or depth. unclear or missing conclusion
    question and broader Conclusion is clear Conclusion is somewhat
    literature. Clear and unclear
    concise conclusion

    Organization & Project is exceptionally Good organization and Adequate organization, Poor organization and Inadequate or completely
    Clarity well-organized, with a clarity, with a mostly but may lack clarity or unclear presentation of chaotic organization and
    logical flow and clear logical flow of ideas have some disruptions in ideas lack of clarity
    presentation of ideas the flow

    Writing Exceptional Good Adequate Numerous Inadequate or completely


    Quality/Presentation writing/Presentation writing/Presentation writing/Presentation writing/speaking errors unprofessional
    skills quality, demonstrating a quality with few minor skills, but may contain affecting clarity and writing/Presentation.
    high level of errors some errors or lack a style
    professionalism and consistent academic style
    academic style

    References and Accurate and Good use of references Adequate use of Significant errors in Inadequate or completely
    Citations comprehensive use of with minor errors in references, but with referencing, affecting absent references and
    academic references, accuracy or consistency noticeable errors in the credibility of the citations
    following a consistent accuracy or consistency project
    citation style

    Total ----- / 50 : 5 = ----- / 10

    You might also like