Pre Mid - Educ 70
Pre Mid - Educ 70
Pre Mid - Educ 70
- Frankfurt Germany
- one can be an effective facilitator of - Jewish
learning if one has a good working - Taught @ Harvard Medical School,
knowledge of the learners’ UC Berkley, Yale, San Francisco
development. Psychoanalytic Institute, Austen
- Child and Adolescent Development Riggs Center, Center for Advanced
course, the foundational theories Studies
related to learners’ development
- module aims to help you think about Erikson’s Psycho-Social Development
the and review these theories that Age ( Years), Stage, Psychosocial Crisis,
you have taken up and connects Psychosocial Strength & environmental
them to learning. influence.
2. Erik Erikson
5. Bronfenbrenner’s bio-ecological
3. Jean Piaget theory
- Piaget’s cognitive development
theory
- was born in Switzerland in 1986.
- He was a psychologist.
- He concluded that children were not
less intelligent than adults, they
simply think differently.
4. Lawrence Kohlberg
- Kohlberg’s
theory of moral development
- Born in 1927.He died on January
17th ,1987 at the age of 59.
- His book on moral development is
used by teachers around the world
to promote moral reasoning.
- Believes that our ability to choose
right from wrong is tied with our
ability to understand & reason
logically.
- In his research, he presented moral
dilemmas( difficult problems) to the
individuals and asked for their
responses. He was interested in
analyzing the moral reasoning
behind that responses.
LESSON 4: Student Diversity provide multiple contexts relevant to
students from diverse backgrounds.
FACTORS THAT BRING ABOUT
STUDENT DIVERSITY - Adapt to the students’ diverse
1. Socioeconomic Status backgrounds and learning styles by
(lower income, middle income or higher) allowing them personal choice and
decision-making opportunities.
2. Thinking/ Learning style
(better in seeing, listening or manipulating - Diversify your method of assessing
something) and evaluating student learning.
Behaviorist
1. Ivan Pavlov -classical conditioning
(stimulus-response)
2. Edward Thorndike - experimental 🞭 Pavlov discovered classical conditioning
approach only almost by accident. Originally, he wanted to
3. John B. Watson - experimental study the role of salivation in digestion. He
approach only measured how much saliva dogs produce
4. B.F Skinner - Operant Conditioning when given meat. After a few days in the
experiment, Pavlov noticed that the dogs in
JOHN BROADUS WATSON his laboratory started salivating when the
🞭 Born Jan 9, 1878 lab attendant entered the room with the
🞭 Died Sept 25, 1958 meat dish, before meat was placed in their
🞭 Born in Greenville, South Carolina mouth.
🞭 American psychologist
🞭 Established the psychological school of
behaviourism
🞭 “Little Albert” experiment
J. WATSON
🞭 The first to study how the process of
learning affects our behavior, and he 🞭 A STIMULUS is an observable
formed the school of thought known as environmental event that has a potential to
BEHAVIORISM. exert control over a behavioral response.
E. THORNDIKE
🞭 Thorndike specified three conditions that
maximize learning:
- The Law of Effect states that the
likely recurrence of a response is
generally governed by its
consequence or effect generally in
the form of reward or punishment.
- The Law of Exercise stated that
stimulus-response associations are
strengthened through repetition.
- The Law of Readiness states that,
the more readiness the learner has
to respond to stimulus, the stronger
will the bond between them.
PAVLOV’S EXPERIMENT
TYPES OF REINFORCEMENT AND
PUNISHMENT
2. Operant Conditioning
BURRHUS FREDERIC SKINNER
🞭 Born March 20, 1904
🞭 Died August 18, 1990 SCHEDULE OF REINFORCEMENT
🞭 Born in Susquehanna, Pennsylvania 🞭 Reinforces are more effective when they
🞭 American psychologist, author, inventor, are given as soon as possible after a
advocate for social reform and poet. student performs the target behavior. In
🞭 Innovated his own philosophy of science continuous reinforcement like this, a
called Radical Behaviorism student learns very rapidly but when the
🞭 Operant or instrumental conditioning is a reinforcement stops, the behavior
form of learning in which the consequences decreases rapidly too. Therefore, the
of behavior lead to changes in the schedule of reinforcement was developed.
probability that the behavior will occur. The schedule will determine when a
behavior will be reinforced.
4 TYPES
🞭 Fixed-ratio schedule
🞭 Variable-ratio schedule
🞭 Fixed-interval schedule
🞭 REINFORCEMENT is a consequence 🞭 Variable-internal schedule
that increases the probability that a
behavior will occur.
🞭 PUNISHMENT is a consequence that
decreases the probability a behavior will
occur.
🞭 Put it another way, reinforcement will
strengthen a behavior while punishment will
weaken a behavior.
DANGERS OF PUNISHMENT Tolman’s Key Concepts
🞭 Punishment can be abusive. 1. Learning is always purposive and
- For example, a teacher might goal – directed
become so aroused when he is - Individuals do more than merely
punishing a student that he respond to stimuli; they act on
becomes abusive. beliefs, attitudes, changing
conditions, and they strive towards
🞭 Punishment may create a new problem, a goal.
that is aggression.
- Students commonly react to 2. Cognitive Maps
physical punishment by learning to - Famous experiment on rats
dislike the punisher and perhaps by concluded that organisms or
reacting aggressively toward that individuals to be exact learned the
person. location and will select the shortest
or easiest path to achieve the goal.
Thus, punishment does not convey any - Ex. Going to school everyday.
information about what an alternative and 3. Latent Learning
more appropriate behavior might be. - Learning that remains or stays with
the individual until needed.
It may suppress one inappropriate behavior - Learning that is outwardly
only to be replaced by another one. manifested at once.
Punishment can turn out to be reinforcing. - Ex. A 2 yr. old handling remote for
the first time.
A student might learn that misbehaving will 4. The Concept of Intervening Variable
get the teacher’s attention. - Variables that are not readily seen
but serves as determinants of
LESSON 7: Neo Behaviorism: Tolman behavior.
and Bandura - Learning is mediated or influenced
Neo Behaviorism by expectations, perceptions,
representations, needs and other
Tolman’s Purposive Bandura’s Social
Behaviorism Learning Theory internal or environmental variables.
- Ex. Experiment on Rats - Hunger
Goal- Directedness Principles 5. Reinforcement Not Essential for
Learning
Cognitive maps Modeling
- Reinforcement is not essential for
Latent learning 4 Conditions for learning, although it provides an
effective Modeling incentive for performance.
- Ex. Rats acquired knowledge of the
Interviewing way through maze in the absence of
Variables
reinforcement.