Fedex Corporation, 2015: Final Group Case Study
Fedex Corporation, 2015: Final Group Case Study
Fedex Corporation, 2015: Final Group Case Study
SEMESTER 2 2017/2018
Prepared by : GROUP 1
Prepared by : GROUP 1
Group’s Members
1
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2.2.2 Table Competitive Force – United States Postal Service (USPS) .......................... 16
2
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
3
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
5.1.1 SO STRATEGY...................................................................................................... 81
5.7.1 STRENGTH............................................................................................................ 92
4
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
5.7.4 THREATS............................................................................................................... 95
5
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
Headquartered in Memphis, Tennessee, and founded in 1971, FedEx is one of the largest express
freight delivery companies in the world, having about 57,000 drop-off locations, 700 aircraft, and
62,000 vehicles. FedEx does business in over 220 countries and employs over 220,000 workers.
FedEx primary business segments are FedEx Express, FedEx Ground, and FedEx Freight. (Page
436 para 7) FedEx reported 2015 revenues of $47.4 billion with net income of over $1 billion
FedEx acquired GENCO Distribution System, Inc. in January 2015. The GENCO acquisition is
expected to further FedEx’s commitment to its customers by improving logistics offerings. (Page
442 para 3) FedEx is flying high. In mid-2015, the company signed a deal to buy 50 additional
Boeing Co (BA.N) 767-300 freighters in the biggest order ever for the plane, allowing Boeing to
extend its production line well into the next decade. (Page 442 para 4)
6
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
1973 Company officially began operating with 14 small aircraft. (Page 434
para 3)
1975 FedEx first turned a profit in 1975 and was instrumental in lobbying for
the deregulation of air cargo that was passed in 1977. (Page 434 para
History 4)
1983 The firm reached $1 billion in sales, marking the first ever for a US
7
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
2015 FedEx offered to acquire Dutch delivery firm TNT Express N.V. for
FedEx appears not to have a written vision statement. (Page 436, paragraph 1)
FedEx Corporation will produce superior financial returns for its shareowners
Vision/
by providing high… …will be the first consideration in all operations.
Mission
Corporate activities will be conducted to the highest ethical and professional
Operating FedEx does business in over 220 countries (Page 434 para 1)
Location
Business world)
Segment by FedEx Ground (principle player in the United States and Canada ground
services.)
US - $11.6billion
Revenue by
International - $8.7 billion
Division
FedEx Total Revenue (2014) - $45.5 billion
8
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
A vision statement should answer the basic question, “What we want to become”, that the firm
strives to achieve in the long term. At a minimum, a vision statement should reveal the type of
business the firm engages. A clear vision provides the foundation for developing a comprehensive
mission statement.
FedEx’s vision is "To be the leader in worldwide courier services by providing universally
philosophy, and basic technology. There are few components that FedEx should consider in
5. Concern for survival, growth, and profitability - Is the firm committed to growth and
financial soundness?
6. Philosophy - What are the basic beliefs, values, aspirations, and ethical priorities of the firm?
9
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
8. Concern for public image - Is the firm responsive to social, community, and environmental
concerns?
FedEx Corporation will produce superior financial returns for its shareowners by providing high
value added logistics, transportation and related business services through focused operating
companies. Customer requirements will be met in the highest quality manner appropriate to each
market segment served. FedEx will strive to develop mutually rewarding relationships with its
employees, partners, and suppliers. Safety will be the first consideration in all operations.
Corporate activities will be conducted to the highest ethical and professional standards.
We are committed to meet the needs of individual, business and institutional customer (1) with the
latest technology innovation (4) in courier delivery services. (2) We believe in treating our
customer first, with highest possible service. (6) We will provide efficient and timely delivery
service (7) into the worldwide market (3) for the superior financial returns to our shareowner. (5)
We provide opportunities for employees to grow and succeed (9) as safety will be the first
(72 words)
10
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
1. Political
2. Economic
11
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
para 1)
Demand for air cargo rose over 2 percent from May 2013
12
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
Annual revenues in the LTL are over $50 billion. (Page 441
para 5)
Only in select parts of the South and West are there reliable
6)
4. Technology
13
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
5. Legal
6. Environment
TOTAL 12 5
440 para 1)
14
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
4)
TOTAL 2 3
15
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
440 para 5)
440 para 5)
para 5)
16
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
TOTAL - 6
TOTAL - 1
17
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
Competitive Force
No Case Facts
Strong Moderate Weak
Total 1 1 -
Competitive Force
No Case Facts
Strong Moderate Weak
18
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
Competitive Force
No Case Facts
Strong Moderate Weak
Total 2 - -
Competitive Force
No Case Facts
Strong Moderate Weak
1. However, with e-commerce growing, new delivery
Total - 1 -
Competitive Force
No Case Facts
Strong Moderate Weak
Total 1 - -
19
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
Competitive Force
No Case Facts
Strong Moderate Weak
440 para 6)
Total - - 1
Competitive Force
No Case Facts
Strong Moderate Weak
1. Rivalry among existing firms 1 1 -
Total 4 2 1
PESTEL Political - -
Economic 12 3
Technology - 1
20
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
Legal - 1
Total (P) 12 5
Competitive United Parcel Service (UPS) 2 3
Total (C) 2 10
From the summary table of opportunities and threats, there are 14 opportunities that already
identified in external analysis both in PESTEL and competitive analysis. All the opportunities are
listed as below to be ranked (1-10) based on their priority. The 10 key external factors of
43, para 5)
21
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
increase.(Page 44 para 3)
22
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
44, para 6)
para 2)
From the summary table of opportunities and threats, there are 15 threats that already identified
in external analysis both in PESTEL and competitive analysis. All the opportunities are listed as
below to be ranked (1-10) based on their priority. The 10 key external factors of threat later will
6)
23
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
440 para 3)
24
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
Opportunities
para 3)
25
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
para 4)
para 3)
para 4)
26
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
Threats
44, para 2)
who mail 50,000 parcels a year. (Page 440 para 0.02 2 0.04
6)
27
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
1)
A total weight score of 2.70 out of 4.00 indicates that FedEx is responding in an outstanding way
28
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
In the delivery service, FedEx has few competitors in the markets. Because of limitation inputs of
scale in their operating system, FedEx need to aggressively compete with UPS, USPS and
Deutsche Post (DPW.DE) as they all have a large number of employees, efficient transport systems
and offer the best services to customers through various. Therefore, we will look at employees and
income generation in producing mapping for the shipping industry for FedEx, UPS and USPS.
29
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
$45.5 Billion
$67.8 Billion
30
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
$2.1 Billion
$4.4 Billion
2 Net income
$5.5 Billion
231,500
213,200
Number of
3
Employee
488,000
488,000
440 para 1)
31
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
436 para 5)
32
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
440 para 5)
Number of
0.15 3 0.45 3 0.45 4 0.60
Employees
Number of
0.15 2 0.30 4 0.60 4 0.60
Vehicles
33
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
The CPM provided above shows that the most important factor is the business segment which is
can be said the service that each company offer to customers. As USPS received the highest
number, can be seen that USPS provides first class mail and letters, where customers have little
choice or bargaining power on who to do business with. However, it does not mean that FedEx is
doing a less better than UPS and USPS. It is just showing that USPS is doing better in certain area.
34
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
than-truckload (LTL)
freight services.
35
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
36
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
37
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
4. • FedEx operates in a
business where large
carbon footprints are
the norm. (Page 436,
Belief para 2)
Understanding
38
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
12,000 pick-up
to expand to over
20,000 in Europe
alone by year-end
2)
39
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
increase in expenses in
40
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
Genco is expected to
further FedEx’s
commitment to its
customers by improving
GENCO to operate as
442 para 2)
a deal to bu 50 additional
Boeing Co 767-300
para 3)
41
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
12,000 pick-up
to expand to over
20,000 in Europe
alone by year-end
2)
42
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
constantly
downsizing
operations, replacing
machines and
consolidating mail
1)
infrastcuture, the
investment is designed to
of consumer goods
para 4)
43
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
transport of shipments
Motivating - -
study case study
involves efforts
directed
toward shaping
44
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
Carriers Association;
45
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
46
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
Total 13 1
Competitors
No Items Strength Weakness
FedEx (UPS, USPS &
DPW.DE)
delivery in anywhere
based on client
47
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
Competitors
No Items Strength Weakness
FedEx (UPS, USPS &
DPW.DE)
6)
attractive shipping
customers..(Page 439
para 2)
$40 annual
membership,
48
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
Competitors
No Items Strength Weakness
FedEx (UPS, USPS &
DPW.DE)
at a specified pick-up
location.(Page 440
para 1)
attractive shipping
customers..(Page 439
para 2)
$40 annual
membership,
at a specified pick-up
location.(Page 440
para 1)
49
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
Competitors
No Items Strength Weakness
FedEx (UPS, USPS &
DPW.DE)
attractive shipping
customers..(Page 439
para 2)
$40 annual
membership,
at a specified pick-up
location.(Page 440
para 1)
attractive shipping
customers..(Page 439
para 2)
50
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
Competitors
No Items Strength Weakness
FedEx (UPS, USPS &
DPW.DE)
$40 annual
membership,
at a specified pick-up
location.(Page 440
para 1)
attractive shipping
customers..(Page 439
para 2)
Total 8 4
51
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
the case
Total 1 4
52
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
para 1)
20 percent reduction by
53
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
added logistics,
focused operating
para 3)
case
54
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
2) 440 para 6)
55
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
20 percent reduction by
Total 5 1
Culture Assessment 14 -
Marketing Assessment 8 4
Production/Operation Assessment 5 1
Total 41 10
56
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
From the summary table of opportunities and threats, there are 41 strengths that already identified
in internal analysis through all the assessments involved (culture, management function,
marketing, financial/accounting, production/operation and MIS) . All the strengths are listed as
below to be ranked (1-10) based on their priority. The 10 key internal factors of strengths later will
1. FedEx has 700 aircrafts (Page 434 para 1), In mid 2015, FedEx signed a deal
2. FedEx opened a hub in Mexico City and Osaka Japan to better facilitate the
4
delivery of shipments (Page 436 para 4)
4. The declines are partly from newer more fuel-efficient engines, but also from
building more strategically located hubs and dispatch facilities. (Page 436 10
para 3)
6. FedEx Ground is a principle player in the United States and Canada ground
5
package delivery system. (Page 436 para 6)
57
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
8. FedEx Express covers many services focused on timely delivery but also on
3
cost savings (Page 436 para 7)
9. Working with customers on their supply chain has help reduced fuel usage
8
(Page 436 para 2)
para 2)
From the summary table of opportunities and threats, there are 10 weaknesses that already
identified in internal analysis through all the assessments involved (culture, management function,
marketing, financial/accounting, production/operation and MIS) . All the weaknesses are listed as
below to be ranked (1-10) based on their priority. Only 7 key internal factors of weaknesses later
1. The firm paid 35% taxes in fiscal year 2015, and has over $3 billion in
7
goodwill on the balance sheet (Page 437, para 4)
58
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
2. FedEx net profit margin in 2015, 0.022 lower than in 2014 (0.046) (Page 436
5
Exhibit 3)
3. FedEx total liabilities in 2015, $22 billion increased than in 2014 ($17 billion)
4
(Page 436 Exhibit 3)
4. FedEx net income in 2015, $1.05 billion lower than in 2014 ($2.1 billion)
6
(Page 436 Exhibit 3)
5. FedEx has 62,000 vehicles, which is lower than UPS who owns 103,000
1
vehicles (Page 434, para 1) (Page 440, para 1)
6. As FedEx Ground compete with UPS in the LTL (Less than Truck Load),
LTL requires a large hub structure and also high costs at labor (Page 441, 2
para 4)
7. FedEx operating income in 2015, $1.8 billion lower than in 2014 ($3.4
3
billion) (Page 436 Exhibit 3)
59
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
Strengths
60
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
para 4)
Weaknesses
UPS who owns 103,000 vehicles (Page 434 para 0.07 1 0.07
para 4)
61
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
Exhibit 3)
Exhibit 3)
A total weight score of 3.11 out of 4.00 indicates that FedEx have a strong internal position to be
62
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
Inbound logistic
1. FedEx is one of the largest express freight delivery companies in the world, having about
Outbound logistic
1. FedEx SmartPost business uses the United States Postal Service (USPS) to deliver
smaller packages that are less time sensitive. (Page 437 para 2)
Marketing/ sales
2. FedEx also has recycling programs in place for a variety of items, including batteries,
printer ink cartridges, lights, paper, oil, tires, plastics, and many other product. (Page
436 para 4)
Operational
1. FedEx is comprised of subsidiaries; FedEx ground, FedEx express, FedEx freight, and
Service
1. FedEx Ground offers services to nearly 100 percent of all U.S. residences and most
63
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
Firm infrastructure
1. FedEx have about 700 aircraft, and 62,000 vehicles. (Page 434 para 1)
2. FedEx opened a new hub in Mexico City in 2014; FedEx also opened a new hub in Osaka
Human resource
1. FedEx uses a divisional by product organizational structure, but the firm does not appear
to have executives with popular titles such as COO, CTO, CSO, HRM, or R&D. (Page
434, paragraph 6)
Technology advancement
1. The declines are partly from newer more fuel-efficient engines, but also from building
more strategically located hubs and dispatch facilities. In addition, working with
customers on their own supply chain has helped reduced fuel usage. (Page 436,
paragraph 3)
Based from the value chain analysis, there were several recommendations that we can suggest to
improve its work process. Under outbound logistic, FedEx can introduce pickup location as their
competitor done. It will help their customer to collect their items based on their time and flexibility,
Second suggestion is under technology advancement where FedEx can implement e-commerce
payment method, it will help the consumer since that the world payment method are heading to
cashless systems. The technology advancement recommendation will affect the FedEx market
64
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
grow in future in-term of branding of the company and will increase the sale due to better payment
method.
Remarks:
No. Long Term Objectives Short Term Objectives Successful/
Unsuccessful
Smith named his new company
65
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
Remarks:
No. Long Term Objectives Short Term Objectives Successful/
Unsuccessful
ever for a U.S. company to reach
para 4)
para 2)
66
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
Remarks:
No. Long Term Objectives Short Term Objectives Successful/
Unsuccessful
and the United States. Currently,
4)
436, para 5)
67
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
Remarks:
No. Long Term Objectives Short Term Objectives Successful/
Unsuccessful
a growing European market as
68
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
Remarks:
No. Long Term Objectives Short Term Objectives Successful/
Unsuccessful
FedEx Express is continuing its
acquisition of foreign companies
to establish domestic services for
those areas. Freight accounted for
$4.1 billion of FedEx Express’s
1 Successful
2014 revenues. FedEx Express
plans on an increase in expenses in
2015 and 2016 as the segment
modernizes its airline and
trucking fleet. (Page 437, para 1)
As Christmas approached, the
69
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
434, para 5)
2 Backward Integration FedEx traces its history to 1971, when Frederick Smith (the
70
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
3 Horizontal Integration FedEx is also acquiring firms around the world in locations such
4 Market Penetration Across Europe, FedEx opened 100 new stations across 11
para 5)
5 Market Development Continuing its global expansion, FedEx opened a new hub in
Diversification
71
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
3 Differentiation Also, the company uses recycled paper in most all of their
72
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
73
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
commitment to its
customers by improving
74
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
GENCO to operate as
442 para 2)
provider of less-than-
75
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
outside the United States SO1. Open more new store WO1. As International
currently are a $200 billion in Mexico over the next three rates tend to offer a higher
industry with 3 to 4 percent years. (S2, S4, S6, O4, O7) margin, and customers
billion by 2020. (Page 439 the business are growing and develop and offer premium
O2. With oil prices falling smooth the business process both net income and net
dramatically in 2014–2015, while reduce time delivery that profit margin (W5, W6,
76
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
para 4)
dramatically in 2014–2015,
rising.(Page 44 para 3)
increase.(Page 44 para 3)
3)
77
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
internationally
commerce growing, new ST1. Since FedEx the most WT1. FedEx will
T2. Mail volume continues to additional aircraft), FedEx reduce cost of labor which
decrease, due to the also could penetrate China this plan will help to
78
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
increased use of email, and Vietnam market to increase the net income
bank draft billing, and the compete UPS. (S1, T7) and net profit margin.
advertising to internet.
T3. Even with an improving ST2. FedEx could imitate WT2. FedEx collaborate
outlook for international if they are not at home during China and Vietnam to
murky due to competition avoid missing packages and both countries as a new
from large ocean shipping theft. This new approach approach to increase its
companies, new ports, and seems aligned with its operating income and
quicker shipping times. culture; provides worldwide overall net income. (W3,
2)
79
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
downsizing operations;
para 1)
para 6)
80
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
consolidate mail-
5.1.1 SO STRATEGY
SO Strategies Factors
Market Penetration
SO1. Open more new store in Mexico over the next three years. (S2, S4, S6, O4,
O7)
Product Development
SO2. FedEx introduce e-commerce payment services as the business (S2, S3, O3, O10)
are growing and this help the company to smooth the business
market.
81
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
6.1.2 WO STRATEGY
WO Strategies Factors
Product Development
WO1. As International rates tend to offer a higher margin, and (W5, W6, O10)
Market Development
WO2. With the latest development that Africa will more of a global (W5, W6, O8)
player in the future, FedEx should open its new hub in Africa to
competitor, UPS.
5.1.3 ST STRATEGY
ST Strategies Factors
Market Penetration
ST1. Since FedEx the most strength is having more aircraft than its (S1, T7)
Product Development
ST2. FedEx could imitate UPS by introducing customers pick up (S2, S3, T4)
82
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
ST Strategies Factors
5.1.4 WT STRATEGY
WT Strategies Factors
Product Development
WT1. FedEx will complete their operation in efficiency by using (W5, W6, T5)
carriage machine to reduce cost of labor which this plan will help
Market Penetration
WT2. FedEx collaborate with Alibaba.com for market acquisition in (W3, W6, T7)
income.
83
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
FP
Conservative 7.0 Aggressive
5.0
UPS
3.0
FedEx
1.0
CP IP
-7.0 -5.0 -3.0 -1.0
-1.0 1.0 3.0 5.0
USPS 7.0
-3.0
-5.0
84
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
FedEx falls under Aggressive which is a financially strong firm that has achieved major
competitive advantages in a growing and stable industry. They are in excellent position to use its
internal strengths to take advantage of external opportunities, overcome internal weaknesses, and
Based on the analysis, below are the strategies that we can suggest for FedEx:
Horizontal Integration: to acquire or in hand with other company that may help increase market
share. FedEx should acquire or acquisition with competitor to increase their market share in the
market.
Product development: Variety of the services, FedEx sould follow the segment by USPS to
business segments: (1) First Class Mail, (2) Standard Mail, (3) Packages, (4) International, and (5)
Market penetration: FedEx is acquiring firms around the world in locations such as the United
Kingdom, Poland, China, South Africa, India, Brazil, and many others. It is FedEx’s strategy to
establish a strong footprint in these areas for domestic package delivery. (page 436 para 5)
Market Development: FedEx should open/increase its new hub inside and outside of USA. New
Mexico City hub is expected to expedite service to Latin America, where revenues are growing
rapidly. FedEx also opened a new hub in Osaka, Japan, in 2014 to better facilitate transport of
85
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
Internaltional
Domestic
Freight Account
Services
Services
Low -0.20
Cash Cows Dogs
As shown in the chart above, FedEx and UPS have high revenues within it business. However,
USPS have low revenue compared with both company FedEx and UPS and USPS also have
different market share position. Thus, result shows that FedEx recorded to be in the star position
Stars is one of the division located in quadrant 2 at the upper left side on the BCG matrix. Stars
represents the organization’s best long-run opportunities for growth and profitability. Thus, stars
operate in high growth industries and maintain high market share. Stars are both cash generators
and cash users. They are the primary units in which the company should invest its money, because
stars are expected to become cash cows and generate positive cash flows. Yet, not all stars become
cash flows. This is especially true in rapidly changing industries, where new innovative products
cash cow, becomes a dog. Refer to the result above, only FedEx and UPS in the column star.
86
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
Question marks is the division in Quadrant I at the upper right side have a low relative market
share position, yet they compete in a high-growth industry. Generally, these firms’ cash needs are
high and their cash generation is low. These businesses are called question marks because the
organization must decide whether to strengthen them by pursuing an intensive strategy (market
penetration, market development, or product development) or to sell them. This question marks
87
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
High
4.0
THE EFE WEIGHTED SCORES
FedEx
Low
1.0
88
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
Market Penetration
III, V, VII Maintain and Hold
Product Development
Based from the IE Matrix above, FedEx was located in IV quadrant which is “Grow and Build”
strategies. In this strategy the suitable for the particular quadrant are intensive strategies which
consist of market penetration, market development and product development and also integrative
89
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
Quadrant II Quadrant I
FedEx
FedEx Ground
Freight
Weak Competitive Strong Competitive
FedEx Express
Position
From the matrix above, it shows that all division within FedEx are located at Quadrant 1 in Grand
Strategy Matrix except FedEx Express that doesn’t have really strong market growth. However,
FedEx Ground and FedEx Freight have strong market position and strong competitive position. In
Therefore, the strategies that could be proposed for such strong firm are:
1. Market development
2. Market penetration
3. Product development
4. Forward integration
5. Backward integration
6. Horizontal integration
7. Related diversification
90
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
SPACE ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
IE ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 2.
BCG 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.
TOTAL 3 3 4 4 4 4 1
91
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
5.7.1 STRENGTH
FedEx has 700 aircrafts (pg 434, para 1), In mid 2015, FedEx signed
0.10 4 0.40 1 0.10
a deal to buy 50 additional Boeing Co 767-300 freighters to extend
1 its production line well into the next decade (pg 442, para 3)
The business segment provides worldwide delivery in anywhere 0.09 4 0.36 3 0.27
2 from 1 to 5 business days based on client needs.(pg 437 para 1)
FedEx Express covers many services focused on timely delivery
0.08 3 0.24 4 0.32
3 but also on cost savings (pg 436, para 7)
FedEx opened a hub in Mexico City and Osaka Japan to better
0.06 4 0.24 2 0.12
4 facilitate the delivery of shipments (pg 436, para 4)
FedEx Ground is a principle player in the United States and
0.06 2 0.12 4 0.24
5 Canada ground package delivery system (pg 436, para 6)
Between 2011 and 2012, revenues from “international domestic” 0.06 4 0.24 3 0.18
6 operations rose from $650 million ro $1.4 billion. (pg 436, para 5)
FedEx acquisition with Genco is expected to further FedEx’s
commitment to its customers by improving logistics offerings.
0.07 0 0.00 0 0.00
FedEx also plans to allow GENCO to operate as subsidiary and
7 keep its management team (pg 442, para 2)
Working with customers on their supply chain has help reduced
0.07 3 0.21 1 0.07
8 fuel usage (pg 436, para 2)
FedEx freight is a top U.S. provider of less-than-truckload (LTL)
0.07 3 0.21 2 0.14
9 freight services (pg 436, para 6)
The declines are partly from newer more fuel-efficient engines,
but also from building more strategically located hubs and 0.05 4 0.20 1 0.05
10 dispatch facilities (Page 436 para 3)
92
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
5.7.2 WEAKNESSES
93
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
5.7.3 OPPORTUNITIES
94
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
5.7.4 THREATS
Based on the strategy selection table above, the most strategies in common are taken into
consideration, but two of the most common are chosen for QSPM analysis. The strategies are:
Strategy 1:
Market Penetration; Open more new store in Mexico over the next three years.
95
Group Case Study: FedEx Corporation, 2015
Strategic Management MBSA1213
Strategy 2:
Product Development; FedEx introduce e-commerce payment services as the business are
growing and this help the company to smooth the business process while reduce time delivery that
6.0 CONCLUSION
According to the QSPM Matrix, the sum total attractiveness score of Strategy 1 – Market
Penetration is 4.95 while Strategy 2 – Product Development is 3.14. The chosen strategy in this
analysis is S1 -Market Penetration by way that FedEx open more new store in Mexico over the
next three years. (S2, S4, S6, O4, O7). This strategy is related to the fact that FedEx in year between
2011 and 2012, revenues from “international domestic” operations rose from $650 million to $1.4
billion (Page 436 para 5). From this strength it is also supported that FedEx opened a hub in
Mexico City and Osaka Japan to better facilitate the delivery shipments (Page 436 para 4). In
addition, it is also stated the opportunity in Mexico is the third-largest U.S trade partner, accounting
for 13.5 percent of all U.S trade (Page 436 para 5). There is, possibly Mexico will become a larger
player as manufacturing plants want to relocate closer to United States, as fuel prices and labor
wages in Asia increase (Page 440 para3). Therefore, the chosen strategy can be considered by
96