Railway Bridge Inspection Using CNN
Railway Bridge Inspection Using CNN
Railway Bridge Inspection Using CNN
Fathimabi Shaik
2023 7th International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC) | 978-1-6654-6408-6/23/$31.00 ©2023 IEEE | DOI: 10.1109/ICCMC56507.2023.10083695
Abstract— The key issue for the railway department has requirements. Prev iously, such problems were solved using
been to examine and monitor railway bridges, as urbanization various methods and technologies outside of India.
expands, the availability of railways grows, and the railway
1.2 Basic Definitions and Background
system has greatly expanded throughout the nation. The
1.2.1 CNN:
expense of maintaining railroad bridges and associated costs
with personnel have been a burden on the railroads. To ensure
CNN (Convolutional neural networks) is a deep learning
transportation safety, concrete bridge crack detection is algorith m used to identify the image by comparing with the
critical. Deep learning technology has made it possible to other related images or previous images. The algorith m used
automatically and accurately detect faults in bridges. The here is the CNN sequential model. Different layers will be
present methods are not accurate and they require a large size added to the model and then the model will be trained with
of dataset for model training and they require a high the labelled data.
computational power model training. The proposed model is a
convolutional neural network (CNN) based end-to-end crack
detection model. The proposed model achieved a 95%
detection accuracy.
I. INTRO DUCTIO N
This research work provides a general overview o f
its objectives, origins, and applications. It outlines the
requirements and scope of the research work and includes Fig 1.1 CNN Algorithm
stoppers, wh ich specify the conditions under which the 1.2.2 Image processing:
research work is appropriate. With technology such as Initially, the image is processed using grey and negat ive
remote sensing, it is now possible to monitor bridges even image p rocessing. It is observed that the cracks are
without physically present and receive results promptly. The identified in both the image processing. Image p rocessing
analysis focuses mainly on model-based finite element plays a crucial ro le in identification o f cracks in the
update techniques, non-model-based (data-driven) defect bridges. It is necessary to avoid those types of railway
detection techniques such as artificial neural networks, and problems. Image processing helps in the identification o f
structural health monitoring techniques based on Bayesian cracks in the structure.
belief networks. The main focus is on issues related to 1.2.3 VGG 19:
bridge cracking. VGG19 is a deep learning arch itecture developed by
Cracks on concrete surfaces are one of the earliest signs of Oxfo rd Un iversity in 2014. It features 19 layers, including
structural degradation, which is crucial fo r maintenance. 16 convolutional and 3 fully connected layers. Th is model
Continued exposure can lead to significant environ mental is often used fo r image classificat ion tasks and has been
damage. The rev iew p rovides analysis based on image pre-trained on the ImageNet dataset for t ransfer learning .
processing techniques, objectives, accuracy levels, erro r VGG-19 is recognized for its high accuracy in image
levels, and image datasets. Finally, this paper present recognit ion and its use of s mall convolut ional filters,
various research issues that can be useful for future research resulting in a large nu mber of parameters. Although its
on crack detection. accuracy is impressive, the model requires a substantial
1.1 Origin of the Problem amount of co mputational power, making it challenging to
Railways play a crucial role in the GDP o f the deploy in resource-limited env iron ments. Despite these
Indian economy. It has been identified that the Indian limitat ions, VGG-19 remains a favored choice fo r image
Railways recently mentioned a problem in their portal, classificat ion because of its performance and the
which included both technical and non-technical availability of pre-trained weights.
10. The model is trained with the train and validation data Fro m the observations conclude that CNN gave best results
ratio is 80:20. The t rain dataset contains 3864 images and in terms of accuracy and training time.
validation dataset contains 966 images.
REFERENCES
[1] Ayele, Yonas Zewdu, Mostafa Aliyari, David Griffiths, and Enrique
Lopez Droguett. "Automatic crack segmentation for UAV-assisted bridge
Fig 4.5 VGG 19 model accuracy inspection." Energies 13, no. 23 (2020): 6250.
In this research work, the co mparison of model performance [2] Wang, Haoyu, Ling Chang, and Valeri Markine. "Structural health
based on accuracy suggests that the CNN with 95% monitoring of railway transition zones using satellite radar
accuracy is a better model than the VGG19 with 80% data." Sensors 18, no. 2 (2018): 413.
accuracy. However, it is important to take into consideration [3] Endsley, Arthur, Colin Brooks, Devin Harris, T ess Ahlborn, and
other factors such as computation cost, training time, and Khatereh Vaghefi. "Decision support system for integrating remote sensing
generalization to new data. The simp ler and faster CNN is in bridge condition assessment and preservation." In Sensors and Smart
easier to train, deploy, and is well suited for research works Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems
2012, vol. 8345, pp. 1181-1195. SPIE, 2012.
that prioritize these aspects. On the other hand, VGG19,
with its deeper architecture, is better equipped to capture [4] Xu, Hongyan, Xiu Su, Yi Wang, Huaiyu Cai, Kerang Cui, and
complex features in data and excel in tasks that require high Xiaodong Chen. "Automatic bridge crack detection using a convolutional
accuracy. Ultimately, the choice of arch itecture should be neural network." Applied Sciences 9, no. 14 (2019): 2867.
based on a balanced evaluation of accuracy, co mputational
[5] Mohan, Arun, and Sumathi Poobal. "Crack detection using image
resources, and other relevant factors. processing: A critical review and analysis." Alexandria Engineering
Journal 57, no. 2 (2018): 787-798.
[7] Ali L, Alnajjar F, Jassmi HA, Gocho M, Khan W, Serh ani MA.
Performance evaluation of deep CNN-based crack detection and
localization techniques for concrete structures. Sensors. 2021 Mar
1;21(5):1688.
[11] Li, Ruoxian, Jiayong Yu, Feng Li, Ruitao Yang, Yudong Wang, and
Zhihao Peng. "Automatic bridge crack detection using Unmanned aerial
vehicle and Faster R-CNN." Construction and Building Materials 362
(2023): 129659.
[12] Inam, Hina, Naeem Ul Islam, Muhammad Usman Akram, and Fahim
Ullah. "Smart and Automated Infrastructure Management: A Deep
Learning Approach for Crack Detection in Bridge
Images." Sustainability 15, no. 3 (2023): 1866.
[13] Li, Haotian, Hongyan Xu, Xiaodong T ian, Yi Wang, Huaiyu Cai,
Kerang Cui, and Xiaodong Chen. "Bridge crack detection based on
SSENets." Applied Sciences 10, no. 12 (2020): 4230.
[14] Xu, Hongyan, Xiu Su, Huaiyuan Xu, and Haotian Li. "Autonomous
bridge crack detection using deep convolutional neural networks." In 3rd
International Conference on Computer Engineering, Information Science
& Application Technology (ICCIA 2019), pp. 274-284. Atlantis Press,
2019.