Project: PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT BLOCK

Client: Made By: Date: Page

OB 16-Jun-23 1
Checked By: Drg No: Job No
PRINT
OB 05/2020/OB/OB 1
Design of Steel Column
REF CALCULATION OUTPUT
Column design information
Column location and configuration- Edge column
Total design load NEd (kN)= 1101.36 Beam reactions R (kN)
Heigth between restrains, Lcr,y (m) 7.5 R1 = 15.77 R3 = 43.16
Heigth between restrains, Lcr,z (m) 5 R2 = 21.82 0
Applied Moments
My,Ed (kNm)= 0
Mz,Ed (kNm)= 0
Member selection
EC3 Assume nominal thickness tf (of flange) and tw (of web) less than 40mm
Pt. 1.1 = Yield strength of steel, fy, given as; fy = 275N/mm² 275
Required area for axial loading A;
A = NEd/fy = 1101.36×10 / 275
A = 40.1cm² 40.1
Trial section
Try 254x254x73 UC
A= 93.1cm² 93.1
Section properties and dimension
Dimension Properties
Steel h (mm)= 254.1 Iy (cm⁴)= 11400
section b (mm)= 254.6 Iz (cm⁴)= 3910
Tables tw (mm)= 8.6 i y (cm)= 11.1
SCI tf (mm)= 14.2 iz (cm)= 6.48
P364 r (mm)= 12.7 W pl,y (cm³)= 992
d (mm)= 200.3 Wpl,z (cm³)= 465
cf/tf = 8.96 A (cm²)= 93.1 93.1
cw/tw = 23.3 Weight (kg/m) = 73.1
Section classification
For flange thickness tf < 40mm; therefore from Table 7 of BS EN10025-2;
Strength of steel; fy = 275N/mm² 275
Table 5.2 ɛ = √ 235/fy = √(235/275) = 0.92 0.92
Table 5.2 Outstand flange classification
Sheet 2/3 From Table 5.2 of BS EN 1993-1-1: -Class 1 limit for an outstand flange
c = (b - tw - 2r) /2 = (254.6 - 8.6 - 2×12.7)/2 = 110.3mm 110.3
c/tf ≤ 9ɛ = 110.3/14.2 < 9×0.92
c/tf = 7.77 < 8.28 OK
7.77 < 8.28, therefore the outstand flange is Class 1 cross-section
Table 5.2 Internal compression part / web classification
Sheet 1/3 From Table 5.2 of BS EN 1993-1-1: -Class 1 limit for an internal compression element
c = h - 2tf - 2r = 254.1 - 2×14.2 - 2×12.7 = 200.3mm 200.3
c/tw ≤ 33ɛ = 200.3/8.6 < 33×0.92
c/tw = 23.3 < 30.36 OK
23.3 < 30.36, therefore the web in compression is Class 1 cross-section
Overal section is Class 1 under compression

Page 1
Project: PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
Client: Made By: Date: Page
OB 16-Jun-23 1
Checked By: Drg No: Job No
PRINT
OB 05/2020/OB/OB 1
Design of Steel Column
REF CALCULATION OUTPUT
Design moment on column due to beam reaction
For column in simple construction the beam reactions are assumed to act at 100mm from
face column.
R1-R2
tw
y
R3-R4
z

My,Ed = [h/2 + 100 ]×[R3 - R4] Mz,Ed = [tw/2 + 100 ]×[R1 - R2]
My,Ed = [254.1/2+100]×[43.16-0]× 10⁻³ Mz,Ed = [8.6/2+100]×[15.77-21.82]× 10⁻³
= 9.8 kNm = 0.64 kNm
Total design moments
My,Ed = 0 + 9.8 = 9.8kNm 9.8
Mz,Ed = 0 + 0.64 = 0.64kNm 0.64
6.3.1.1 Buckling resistance, Nb,Rd
Eq. 6.46 NEd /Nb, Rd ≤ 1.0
(1) NEd = 1101.36kN 1101.36
Eq. 6.47(3) b,Rd = ꭓAfy/γM1
N
Eq. 6.49 ꭓz = 1/[Φ + √ (Φ² - ƛz²)]
Φ = 0.5 [ 1+ α (ƛz - 0.2) + ƛz²]
Determination of slenderness coefficient
6.3.1.3 λ1 = 93.9ɛ = 93.9 × √(235/275) = 86.8 86.8
ƛy = LEy/iy /λ1 = 7500/(111 × 86.8) >> ƛy = 0.78 0.78
ƛz = LEz/iz /λ1 = 5000/(64.8 × 86.8) >> ƛz = 0.89 0.89
Therefore slenderness factor = 0.89 (about z-z axis) 0.89
Reduction factor
Table 6.2 h/b = 254.1 / 254.6 = 1 < 1.2 and tf = 14.2
Table 6.1 =>for y-y axis, use bucling curve b =>imperfection factor, αLT = 0.34 0.34
Table 6.1 =>for z-z axis, use bucling curve c =>imperfection factor, αLT = 0.49 0.49
Therefore imperfection factor a = 0.49 0.49
Eq. 6.49 Φ = 0.5 [1 + 0.49 (0.89 - 0.2) + 0.89²] = 1.066
Φ = 1.066 1.066
Eq. 6.49 ꭓz = 1/ [1.066 + √ (1.066² - 0.89²)] = 0.606
ꭓz = 0.606 0.606
Eq. 6.47 Nb,z,Rd = 0.606 × 9310 × 275 × 10⁻³ =
= 1551kN
Therefore buckling resistance, Nb,z,Rd = 1551kN 1551
NEd /Nb, Rd = 1101.36 / 1551 = 0.72 0.72
= 0.72 < 1.0 OK
Lateral Torsional Buckling Resistance Moment
Eq. 6.55 Moment resistance, Mb,y,Rd (major axis)
6.3.2.1(3) Mb,y,Rd = ꭓLT Wpl, y fy/γM1
Eq. 6.57 Determination of Reduction factor, ꭓLT

Page 2
Project: PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
Client: Made By: Date: Page
OB 16-Jun-23 1
Checked By: Drg No: Job No
PRINT
OB 05/2020/OB/OB 1
Design of Steel Column
REF CALCULATION OUTPUT
6.3.2.3 ꭓLT = 1/[ΦLT +√(Φ²LT -βƛ²LT)]
(1) ΦLT = 0.5 [ 1 + αLT (ƛLT - ƛLT,0) + βƛ²LT]
ƛLT,0 = 0.4 0.4
β = 0.75 0.75
Table 6.5 h/b = 254.1 / 254.6 = 1 < 2.0 1
>> for I or H rolled sections; >> from Table 6.5, use buckling curve: b b
Table 6.3 From Table 6.3, imperfection factor, αLT = 0.34 0.34
Steel ƛLT = (1/√C1)uvƛz√βw u = 1.0 or 0.9 (for rolled section) 0.9
manual v = 1.0 (conservatively for non-destabilizing loading) 1
Eq. 6.50 ƛz = Lcr/λ1 iz
λ1 = = 93.9×0.92 = 86.38 iz = = 6.48×10 = 64.8
ƛz = Lcr/λ1 iz = 7500/ (86.38 × 64.8) =
ƛz = 1.34 1.34
√βw = 1 1
Table 6.6 1/√C1 = 1. 0 (connection factor) 1
ƛLT = 1×0.9×1×1.34 = 1.21
ƛLT = 1.21 1.21
Eq. 6.57 ΦLT = 0.5 [ 1 + 0.34 (1.21 - 0.4) + 0.75 × 1.21²] = 1.187
ΦLT = 1.187 1.187
Eq. 6.57 ꭓLT = 1/ [1.187 + √ (1.187² - 0.75 × 1.21²)] = 0.58
ꭓLT = 0.58 0.58
Eq. 6.55 Mb,y,Rd = 0.58 × 992 × 275 × 10⁻³/1.0 = 158.22kNm
Mb,y,Rd = 158.22kNm 158.22
Eq. 6.54 My,Ed/Mb,y,Rd = 9.8 / 158.22 = 0.07 0.07
My,Ed/Mb,y,Rd = 0.07 < 1.0 OK
Moment resistance, Mpl,z,Rd (minor axis)
6.3.2.1 Mb,z,Rd = Wpl,z fy/γM0
= 465 × 275 × 10⁻³/1.0 = 127.87kNm
Mb,z,Rd = 127.87kNm 127.87
Eq. 6.54 Mz,Ed/Mb,z,Rd = 0.64 / 127.87 = 0.01 0.01
Mz,Ed/Mb,z,Rd = 0.01 < 1.0 OK
Combine bending & axial compression buckling(simplified)
SCI NEd/Nb,z,Rd + My,Ed/Mb,y,Rd +1.5 Mz,Ed/Mpl,z,Rd ≤ 1.0
SN 048b = (1101.36/1551) + (9.8/158.22) + (1.5×0.64/127.87) = 0.78
Therefore the ratio, 0.78 < 1.0 OK
ADOPT- 254x254x73 UC, S275

Page 3