Complex Number Primer The Definition

2 The Definition

As I’ve already stated, I am assuming that you have seen complex numbers to this point and that
√
you’re aware that i = −1 and so i2 = −1. This is an idea that most people first see in an algebra
√
class (or wherever they first saw complex numbers) and i = −1 is defined so that we can deal
with square roots of negative numbers as follows,
√ p √ √ √
−100 = (100) (−1) = 100 −1 = 100 i = 10 i

What I’d like to do is give a more mathematical definition of a complex numbers and show that i2 = −1
√
(and hence i = −1 can be thought of as a consequence of this definition. We’ll also take a look
at how we define arithmetic for complex numbers.
What we’re going to do here is going to seem a little backwards from what you’ve probably already
seen but is in fact a more accurate and mathematical definition of complex numbers. Also note
that this section is not really required to understand the remaining portions of this document. It is
here solely to show you a different way to define complex numbers.
So, let’s give the definition of a complex number.
Given two real numbers a and b we will define the complex number z as,

z = a + bi

Note that at this point we’ve not actually defined just what i is at this point. The number a is called
the real part of z and the number b is called the imaginary part of z and are often denoted as,

Rez = a Imz = b

There are a couple of special cases that we need to look at before proceeding. First, let’s take a
look at a complex number that has a zero real part,

z = 0 + bi = bi

In these cases, we call the complex number a pure imaginary number.

Next, let’s take a look at a complex number that has a zero imaginary part,

z = a + 0i = a

In this case we can see that the complex number is in fact a real number. Because of this we can
think of the real numbers as being a subset of the complex numbers.
We next need to define how we do addition and multiplication with complex numbers. Given two
complex numbers z1 = a + bi and z2 = c + di we define addition and multiplication as follows,

z1 + z2 = (a + c) + (b + d) i
z1 z2 = (ac − bd) + (ad + cb) i

© Paul Dawkins –3–

Complex Number Primer Arithmetic

Now, if you’ve seen complex numbers prior to this point you will probably recall that these are the
formulas that were given for addition and multiplication of complex numbers at that point. However,
the multiplication formula that you were given at that point in time required the use of i2 = −1 to
completely derive and for this section we don’t yet know that is true. In fact, as noted previously
i2 = −1 will be a consequence of this definition as we’ll see shortly.
Above we noted that we can think of the real numbers as a subset of the complex numbers. Note
that the formulas for addition and multiplication of complex numbers give the standard real number
formulas as well. For instance, given the two complex numbers,

z1 = a + 0i z2 = c + 0i

the formulas yield the correct formulas for real numbers as seen below.

z1 + z2 = (a + c) + (0 + 0) i = a + c
z1 z2 = (ac − (0) (0)) + (a (0) + c (0)) i = ac

The last thing to do in this section is to show that i2 = −1 is a consequence of the definition
of multiplication. However, before we do that we need to acknowledge that powers of complex
numbers work just as they do for real numbers. In other words, if n is a positive integer we will
define exponentiation as,
z n = z| · z{z
· · · · z}
n times

So, let’s start by looking at i2 , use the definition of exponentiation and the use the definition of
multiplication on that. Doing this gives,

i2 = i · i
= (0 + 1i) (0 + 1i)
= ((0) (0) − (1) (1)) + ((0) (1) + (0) (1)) i
= −1

So, by defining multiplication as we’ve done above we get that i2 = −1 as a consequence of the
√
definition instead of just stating that this is a true fact. If we now take to be the standard square
√
root, i.e. what did we square to get the quantity under the radical, we can see that i = −1.

3 Arithmetic

Before proceeding in this section let me first say that I’m assuming that you’ve seen arithmetic with
complex numbers at some point before and most of what is in this section is going to be a review for
you. I am also going to be introducing subtraction and division in a way that you probably haven’t
seen prior to this point, but the results will be the same and aren’t important for the remaining
sections of this document.

© Paul Dawkins –4–

Complex Number Primer Arithmetic

In the previous section we defined addition and multiplication of complex numbers and showed that
i2 = −1 is a consequence of how we defined multiplication. However, in practice, we generally
don’t multiply complex numbers using the definition. In practice we tend to just multiply two complex
numbers much like they were polynomials and then make use of the fact that we now know that
i2 = −1.
Just so we can say that we’ve worked an example let’s do a quick addition and multiplication of
complex numbers.

Example 1
Compute each of the following.
(a) (58 − i) + (2 − 17i)

(b) (6 + 3i) (10 + 8i)

(c) (4 + 2i) (4 − 2i)

Solution
As noted above, I’m assuming that this is a review for you and so won’t be going into great
detail here.
(a) (58 − i) + (2 − 17i) = 58 − i + 2 − 17i = 60 − 18i

(b) (6 + 3i) (10 + 8i) = 60 + 48i + 30i + 24i2 = 60 + 78i + 24 (−1) = 36 + 78i

(c) (4 + 2i) (4 − 2i) = 16 − 8i + 8i − 4i2 = 16 + 4 = 20

It is important to recall that sometimes when adding or multiplying two complex numbers the result
might be a real number as shown in the third part of the previous example!
The third part of the previous example also gives a nice property about complex numbers.

(a + bi) (a − bi) = a2 + b2 (1)

We’ll be using this fact with division and looking at it in slightly more detail in the next section.
Let’s now take a look at the subtraction and division of two complex numbers. Hopefully, you recall
that if we have two complex numbers, z1 = a + bi and z2 = c + di then you subtract them as,

z1 − z2 = (a + bi) − (c + di) = (a − c) + (b − d) i (2)

© Paul Dawkins –5–

Complex Number Primer Arithmetic

And that division of two complex numbers,

z1 a + bi
= (3)
z2 c + di
can be thought of as simply a process for eliminating the i from the denominator and writing the
result as a new complex number u + vi.
Let’s take a quick look at an example of both to remind us how they work.

Example 2
Compute each of the following.
(a) (58 − i) − (2 − 17i)

6+3i
(b) 10+8i

5i
(c) 1−7i

Solution
(a) (58 − i) − (2 − 17i)
There really isn’t too much to do here so here is the work,

(58 − i) − (2 − 17i) = 58 − i − 2 + 17i = 56 + 16i

6 + 3i
(b)
10 + 8i
Recall that with division we just need to eliminate the i from the denominator and using
Equation 1 we know how to do that. All we need to do is multiply the numerator and
denominator by 10 − 8i and we will eliminate the i from the denominator.

6 + 3i (6 + 3i) (10 − 8i)

=
10 + 8i (10 + 8i) (10 − 8i)
60 − 48i + 30i − 24i2
=
100 + 64
84 − 18i
=
164
84 18
= − i
164 164
21 9
= − i
41 82

© Paul Dawkins –6–

Complex Number Primer Arithmetic

5i
(c)
1 − 7i
We’ll do this one a little quicker.

5i 5i (1 + 7i) −35 + 5i 7 1
= = =− + i
1 − 7i (1 − 7i) (1 + 7i) 1 + 49 10 10

Now, for the most part this is all that you need to know about subtraction and division of complex
numbers for this rest of this document. However, let’s take a look at a more precise and mathe-
matical definition of both of these. If you aren’t interested in this then you can skip this and still be
able to understand the remainder of this document.
The remainder of this document involves topics that are typically first taught in a Abstract/Modern
Algebra class. Since we are going to be applying them to the field of complex variables we won’t
be going into great detail about the concepts. Also note that we’re going to be skipping some of the
ideas and glossing over some of the details that don’t really come into play in complex numbers.
This will especially be true with the “definitions” of inverses. The definitions I’ll be giving below are
correct for complex numbers, but in a more general setting are not quite correct. You don’t need to
worry about this in general to understand what were going to be doing below. I just wanted to make
it clear that I’m skipping some of the more general definitions for easier to work with definitions that
are valid in complex numbers.
Okay, now that I’ve got the warnings/notes out of the way let’s get started on the actual topic...
Technically, the only arithmetic operations that are defined on complex numbers are addition and
multiplication. This means that both subtraction and division will, in some way, need to be defined
in terms of these two operations. We’ll start with subtraction since it is (hopefully) a little easier to
see.
We first need to define something called an additive inverse. An additive inverse is some element
typically denoted by −z so that
z + (−z) = 0 (4)

Now, in the general field of abstract algebra, −z is just the notation for the additive inverse and in
many cases is NOT given by −z = (−1) z ! Luckily for us however, with complex variables that
is exactly how the additive inverse is defined and so for a given complex number z = a + bi the
additive inverse, −z, is given by,
−z = (−1) z = −a − bi

It is easy to see that this does meet the definition of the additive inverse and so that won’t be
shown.
With this definition we can now officially define the subtraction of two complex numbers. Given two
complex numbers z1 = a + bi and z2 = c + di we define the subtraction of them as,

z1 − z2 = z1 + (−z2 ) (5)

© Paul Dawkins –7–

Complex Number Primer Arithmetic

Or, in other words, when subtracting z2 from z1 we are really just adding the additive inverse of z2
(which is denoted by −z2 ) to z1 . If we further use the definition of the additive inverses for complex
numbers we can arrive at the formula given above for subtraction.

z1 − z2 = z1 + (−z2 ) = (a + bi) + (−c − di) = (a − c) + (b − d) i

So, that wasn’t too bad I hope. Most of the problems that students have with these kinds of topics
is that they need to forget some notation and ideas that they are very used to working with. Or, to
put it another way, you’ve always been taught that −z is just a shorthand notation for (−1) z, but
in the general topic of abstract algebra this does not necessarily have to be the case. It’s just that
in all of the examples where you are liable to run into the notation −z in “real life”, whatever that
means, we really do mean −z = (−1) z. Okay, now that we have subtraction out of the way, let’s
move on to division. As with subtraction we first need to define an inverse. This time we’ll need
a multiplicative inverse. A multiplicative inverse for a non-zero complex number z is an element
denoted by z −1 such that
z z −1 = 1

Now, again, be careful not to make the assumption that the “exponent” of -1 on the notation is in
fact an exponent. It isn’t! It is just a notation that is used to denote the multiplicative inverse. With
real (non-zero) numbers this turns out to be a real exponent and we do have that
1
4−1 =
4
for instance. However, with complex numbers this will not be the case! In fact, let’s see just what
the multiplicative inverse for a complex number is. Let’s start out with the complex number z = a+bi
and let’s call its multiplicative inverse z −1 = u + vi. Now, we know that we must have

z z −1 = 1

so, let’s actual do the multiplication.

zz −1 = (a + bi) (u + vi)
= (au − bv) + (av + bu) i
=1

This tells us that we have to have the following,

au − bv = 1 av + bu = 0

Solving this system of two equations for the two unknowns u and v (remember a and b are known
quantities from the original complex number) gives,

a b
u= v=−
a2 + b2 a2 + b2

© Paul Dawkins –8–

Complex Number Primer Arithmetic

Therefore, the multiplicative inverse of the complex number z is,

a b
z −1 = − i (6)
a2 + b2 a2 + b2

As you can see, in this case, the “exponent” of −1 is not in fact an exponent! Again, you really
need to forget some notation that you’ve become familiar with in other math courses.
So, now that we have the definition of the multiplicative inverse we can finally define division of
two complex numbers. Suppose that we have two complex numbers z1 and z2 then the division of
these two is defined to be,
z1
= z1 z2−1 (7)
z2

In other words, division is defined to be the multiplication of the numerator and the multiplicative
inverse of the denominator. Note as well that this actually does match with the process that we
used above. Let’s take another look at one of the examples that we looked at earlier only this time
let’s do it using multiplicative inverses. So, let’s start out with the following division.
6 + 3i
= (6 + 3i) (10 + 8i)−1
10 + 8i

We now need the multiplicative inverse of the denominator and using Equation 6 this is,
10 8 10 − 8i
(10 + 8i)−1 = − 2 i=
102 +8 2 10 + 8 2 164

Now, we can do the multiplication,

6 + 3i 10 − 8i 60 − 48i + 30i − 24i2 21 9

= (6 + 3i) (10 + 8i)−1 = (6 + 3i) = = − i
10 + 8i 164 164 41 82

Notice that the second to last step is identical to one of the steps we had in the original working of
this problem and, of course, the answer is the same.
As a final topic let’s note that if we don’t want to remember the formula for the multiplicative inverse
we can get it by using the process we used in the original multiplication. In other words, to get the
multiplicative inverse we can do the following
1 10 − 8i 10 − 8i
(10 + 8i)−1 = = 2
(10 + 8i) (10 − 8i) 10 + 82

As you can see this is essentially the process we used in doing the division initially.

© Paul Dawkins –9–

Complex Number Primer Conjugate and Modulus

4 Conjugate and Modulus

In the previous section we looked at algebraic operations on complex numbers.There are a couple
of other operations that we should take a look at since they tend to show up on occasion.We’ll also
take a look at quite a few nice facts about these operations.
Complex Conjugate
The first one we’ll look at is the complex conjugate, (or just the conjugate).Given the complex
number z = a + bi the complex conjugate is denoted by z and is defined to be,

z = a − bi (8)

In other words, we just switch the sign on the imaginary part of the number.
Here are some basic facts about conjugates.

z=z (9)
z1 ± z2 = z 1 ± z 2 (10)
z 1 z2 = z 1 z 2 (11)
 
z1 z1
= (12)
z2 z2
The first one just says that if we conjugate twice we get back to what we started with originally and
hopefully this makes some sense.The remaining three just say we can break up sum, differences,
products and quotients into the individual pieces and then conjugate.
So, just so we can say that we worked a number example or two let’s do a couple of examples
illustrating the above facts.

Example 1
Compute each of the following.
(a) z for z = 3 − 15i

(b) z1 − z2 for z1 = 5 + i and z2 = −8 + 3i

(c) z1 − z2 for z1 = 5 + i and z2 = −8 + 3i

Solution
There really isn’t much to do with these other than to so the work so,
(a) z = 3 + 15i ⇒ z = 3 + 15i = 3 − 15i = z
Sure enough we can see that after conjugating twice we get back to our original num-
ber.

© Paul Dawkins – 10 –
Complex Number Primer Conjugate and Modulus

(b) z1 − z2 = 13 − 2i ⇒ z1 − z2 = 13 − 2i = 13 + 2i

(c) z 1 − z 2 = 5 + i − −8 + 3i = 5 − i − (−8 − 3i) = 13 + 2i
We can see that results from (b) and (c) are the same as the fact implied they would
be.

There is another nice fact that uses conjugates that we should probably take a look at.However,
instead of just giving the fact away let’s derive it.We’ll start with a complex number z = a + bi and
then perform each of the following operations.

z + z = a + bi + (a − bi) z − z = a + bi − (a − bi)
= 2a = 2bi

Now, recalling that Re z = a and Im z = b we see that we have,

z+z z−z
Rez = Imz = (13)
2 2i

Modulus
The other operation we want to take a look at in this section is the modulus of a complex num-
ber.Given a complex number z = a + bi the modulus is denoted by |z| and is defined by
p
|z| = a2 + b2 (14)

Notice that the modulus of a complex number is always a real number and in fact it will never be
negative since square roots always return a positive number or zero depending on what is under
the radical.
Notice that if z is a real number (i.e. z = a + 0i) then,
√
|z| = a2 = |a|

where the | · | on the z is the modulus of the complex number and the | · | on the
√ a is the absolute
value of a real number (recall that in general for any real number a we have a2 = |a|).So, from
this we can see that for real numbers the modulus and absolute value are essentially the same
thing.
We can get a nice fact about the relationship between the modulus of a complex number and its
real and imaginary parts.To see this let’s square both sides of Equation 14 and use the fact that
Re z = a and Im z = b.Doing this we arrive at

|z|2 = a2 + b2 = (Re z)2 + (Im z)2

Since all three of these terms are positive we can drop the Im z part on the left which gives the
following inequality,
|z|2 = (Re z)2 + (Im z)2 ≥ (Re z)2

© Paul Dawkins – 11 –
Complex Number Primer Conjugate and Modulus

If we then square root both sides of this we get,

|z| ≥ |Re z|

where the | · | on the z is the modulus of the complex number and the | · | on the Re z are absolute
value bars. Finally, for any real number a we also know that a ≤ |a| (absolute value...) and so we
get,
|z| ≥ |Re z| ≥ Re z (15)

We can use a similar argument to arrive at,

|z| ≥ |Im z| ≥ Im z (16)

There is a very nice relationship between the modulus of a complex number and its conjugate.Let’s
start with a complex number z = a + bi and take a look at the following product.

z z = (a + bi) (a − bi) = a2 + b2

From this product we can see that

z z = |z|2 (17)

This is a nice and convenient fact on occasion.

Notice as well that in computing the modulus the sign on the real and imaginary part of the complex
number won’t affect the value of the modulus and so we can also see that,

|z| = |z| (18)

and
|−z| = |z| (19)

We can also now formalize the process for division from the previous section now that we have
the modulus and conjugate notations.In order to get the i out of the denominator of the quotient
we really multiplied the numerator and denominator by the conjugate of the denominator.Then
using Equation 17 we can simplify the notation a little.Doing all this gives the following formula for
division,
z1 z1 z 2 z1 z 2
= =
z2 z2 z 2 |z2 |2

Here’s a quick example illustrating this,

© Paul Dawkins – 12 –
Complex Number Primer Conjugate and Modulus

Example 2
6 + 3i
Evaluate .
10 + 8i

Solution
In this case we have z1 = 6 + 3i and z2 = 10 + 8i.Then computing the various parts of the
formula gives,
z 2 = 10 − 8i |z2 |2 = 102 + 82 = 164

The quotient is then,

6 + 3i (6 + 3i) (10 − 8i) 60 − 48i + 30i − 24i2 21 9

= = = − i
10 + 8i 164 164 41 82

Here are some more nice facts about the modulus of a complex number.

If |z| = 0 then z = 0 (20)

|z1 z2 | = |z1 | |z2 | (21)

z1 |z1 |
= (22)
z2 |z2 |

Property Equation 20 should make some sense to you.If the modulus is zero then a2 + b2 = 0, but
the only way this can be zero is if both a and b are zero.
To verify Equation 21 consider the following,

|z1 z2 |2 = (z1 z2 ) (z1 z2 ) using property (17)

= (z1 z2 ) (z 1 z 2 ) using property (11)
= z1 z 1 z2 z 2 rearranging terms
2 2
= |z1 | |z2 | using property (17) again (twice)

So, from this we can see that

|z1 z2 |2 = |z1 |2 |z2 |2

Finally, recall that we know that the modulus is always positive so take the square root of both
sides to arrive at
|z1 z2 | = |z1 | |z2 |

Property Equation 22 can be verified using a similar argument.

© Paul Dawkins – 13 –
Complex Number Primer Conjugate and Modulus

Triangle Inequality and Variants

Properties Equation 21 and Equation 22 relate the modulus of a product/quotient of two complex
numbers to the product/quotient of the modulus of the individual numbers.We now need to take a
look at a similar relationship for sums of complex numbers.This relationship is called the triangle
inequality and is,
|z1 + z2 | ≤ |z1 | + |z2 | (23)

We’ll also be able to use this to get a relationship for the difference of complex numbers.
The triangle inequality is actually fairly simple to prove so let’s do that. We’ll start with the left side
squared and use Equation 17 and Equation 10 to rewrite it a little.

|z1 + z2 |2 = (z1 + z2 ) (z1 + z2 ) = (z1 + z2 ) (z1 + z2 )

Now multiply out the right side to get,

|z1 + z2 |2 = z1 z 1 + z1 z 2 + z2 z 1 + z2 z 2 (24)

Next notice that,

z2 z 1 = z 2 z1 = z 2 z1
and so using Equation 13, Equation 15 and Equation 18 we can write middle two terms of the right
side of Equation 24 as

z1 z 2 + z2 z 1 = z1 z 2 + z1 z 2 = 2Re (z1 z 2 ) ≤ 2 |z1 z 2 | = 2 |z1 | |z 2 | = 2 |z1 | |z2 |

Also use Equation 17 on the first and fourth term in Equation 24 to write them as,

z1 z 1 = |z1 |2 z2 z 2 = |z2 |2

With the rewrite on the middle two terms we can now write Equation 24 as

|z1 + z2 |2 = z1 z 1 + z1 z 2 + z2 z 1 + z2 z 2
= |z1 |2 + z1 z 2 + z2 z 1 + |z2 |2
≤ |z1 |2 + 2 |z1 | |z2 | + |z2 |2
= (|z1 | + |z2 |)2

So, putting all this together gives,

|z1 + z2 |2 ≤ (|z1 | + |z2 |)2

Now, recalling that the modulus is always positive we can square root both sides and we’ll arrive
at the triangle inequality.
|z1 + z2 | ≤ |z1 | + |z2 |

There are several variations of the triangle inequality that can all be easily derived.

© Paul Dawkins – 14 –
Complex Number Primer Polar & Exponential Form

Let’s first start by assuming that |z1 | ≥ |z2 |.This is not required for the derivation, but will help to
get a more general version of what we’re going to derive here.So, let’s start with |z1 | and do some
work on it.

|z1 | = |z1 + z2 − z2 |
≤ |z1 + z2 | + |−z2 | Using triangle inequality
= |z1 + z2 | + |z2 |

Now, rewrite things a little and we get,

|z1 + z2 | ≥ |z1 | − |z2 | ≥ 0 (25)

If we now assume that |z1 | ≤ |z2 | we can go through a similar process as above except this time
switch z1 and z2 and we get,

|z1 + z2 | ≥ |z2 | − |z1 | = − (|z1 | − |z2 |) ≥ 0 (26)

Now, recalling the definition of absolute value we can combine Equation 25 and Equation 26 into
the following variation of the triangle inequality.

|z1 + z2 | ≥ | |z1 | − |z2 | | (27)

Also, if we replace z2 with −z2 in Equation 23 and Equation 27 we arrive at two more variations of
the triangle inequality.
|z1 − z2 | ≤ |z1 | + |z2 | (28)
|z1 − z2 | ≥ ||z1 | − |z2 || (29)

On occasion you’ll see Equation 29 called the reverse triangle inequality.

5 Polar & Exponential Form

Most people are familiar with complex numbers in the form z = a + bi, however there are some
alternate forms that are useful at times. In this section we’ll look at both of those as well as a couple
of nice facts that arise from them.
Geometric Interpretation
Before we get into the alternate forms we should first take a very brief look at a natural geometric
interpretation of complex numbers since this will lead us into our first alternate form.
Consider the complex number z = a + bi. We can think of this complex number as either the point
(a, b) in the standard Cartesian coordinate system or as the vector that starts at the origin and ends
at the point (a, b). An example of this is shown in the figure below.

© Paul Dawkins – 15 –
Complex Number Primer Polar & Exponential Form

In this interpretation we call the x-axis the real axis and the y-axis the imaginary axis. We often
call the xy-plane in this interpretation the complex plane.
Note as well that we can now get a geometric interpretation of the modulus. From the image above,
√
we can see that |z| = a2 + b2 is nothing more than the length of the vector that we’re using to
represent the complex number z = a + bi. This interpretation also tells us that the inequality
|z1 | < |z2 | means that z1 is closer to the origin (in the complex plane) than z2 is.
Polar Form
Let’s now take a look at the first alternate form for a complex number. If we think of the non-zero
complex number z = a + bi as the point (a, b) in the xy-plane we also know that we can represent
this point by the polar coordinates (r, θ), where r is the distance of the point from the origin and θ
is the angle, in radians, from the positive x-axis to the ray connecting the origin to the point.

© Paul Dawkins – 16 –
Complex Number Primer Polar & Exponential Form

When working with complex numbers we assume that r is positive and that θ can be any of the
possible (both positive and negative) angles that end at the ray. Note that this means that there
are literally an infinite number of choices for θ.
We excluded z = 0 since θ is not defined for the point (0,0). We will therefore only consider the
polar form of non-zero complex numbers.
We have the following conversion formulas for converting the polar coordinates (r, θ) into the corre-
sponding Cartesian coordinates of the point, (a, b).

a = r cos(θ) b = r sin(θ)

If we substitute these into z = a + bi and factor an r out we arrive at the polar form of the complex
number,
z = r (cos(θ) + i sin(θ)) (30)

Note as well that we also have the following formula from polar coordinates relating r to a and
b. p
r = a2 + b2
but, the right side is nothing more than the definition of the modulus and we see that,

r = |z| (31)

So, sometimes the polar form will be written as,

z = |z| cos(θ) + i sin(θ) (32)

The angle θ is called the argument of z and is denoted by,

θ = arg z

The argument of z can be any of the infinite possible values of θ each of which can be found by
solving
b
tan(θ) = (33)
a
and making sure that θ is in the correct quadrant.
Note as well that any two values of the argument will differ from each other by an integer multiple
of 2π. This makes sense when you consider the following.
For a given complex number z pick any of the possible values of the argument, say θ. If you
now increase the value of θ, which is really just increasing the angle that the point makes with the
positive x-axis, you are rotating the point about the origin in a counter-clockwise manner. Since
it takes 2π radians to make one complete revolution you will be back at your initial starting point
when you reach θ + 2π and so have a new value of the argument. See the figure below.

© Paul Dawkins – 17 –
Complex Number Primer Polar & Exponential Form

If you keep increasing the angle you will again be back at the starting point when you reach θ + 4π,
which is again a new value of the argument. Continuing in this fashion we can see that every time
we reach a new value of the argument we will simply be adding multiples of 2π onto the original
value of the argument.
Likewise, if you start at θ and decrease the angle you will be rotating the point about the origin in a
clockwise manner and will return to your original starting point when you reach θ−2π. Continuing in
this fashion and we can again see that each new value of the argument will be found by subtracting
a multiple of 2π from the original value of the argument.
So, we can see that if θ1 and θ2 are two values of arg z then for some integer k we will have,

θ1 − θ2 = 2πk (34)

Note that we’ve also shown here that z = r cos(θ) + i sin(θ) is a parametric representation for
a circle of radius r centered at the origin and that it will trace out a complete circle in a counter-
clockwise direction as the angle increases from θ to θ + 2π.
The principal value of the argument (sometimes called the principal argument) is the unique
value of the argument that is in the range −π < arg z ≤ π and is denoted by Arg z. Note that the
inequalities at either end of the range tells that a negative real number will have a principal value
of the argument of Arg z = π.
Recalling that we noted above that any two values of the argument will differ from each other by a
multiple of 2π leads us to the following fact.

arg z = Arg z + 2πn n = 0, ±1, ±2, . . . (35)

© Paul Dawkins – 18 –
Complex Number Primer Polar & Exponential Form

We should probably do a couple of quick numerical examples at this point before we move on to
look the second alternate form of a complex number.

Example 1
Write down the polar form of each of the following complex numbers.
√
(a) z = −1 + i 3

(b) z = −9

(c) z = 12 i

Solution
√
(a) z = −1 + i 3
Let’s first get r.
√
r = |z| = 1+3=2

Now let’s find the argument of z. This can be any angle that satisfies Equation 33, but
it’s usually easiest to find the principal value so we’ll find that one. The principal value
of the argument will be the value of θ that is in the range −π < θ ≤ π, satisfies,
√  √ 
3
tan(θ) = ⇒ θ = tan−1 − 3
−1
and is in the second quadrant since that is the location the complex number in the
complex plane.
If you’re using a calculator to find the value of this inverse tangent make sure that you
understand that your calculator will only return values in the range − π2 < θ < π2 and
so you may get the incorrect value. Recall that if your calculator returns a value of
θ1 then the second value that will also satisfy the equation will be θ2 = θ1 + π. So, if
you’re using a calculator be careful. You will need to compute both and the determine
which falls into the correct quadrant to match the complex number we have because
only one of them will be in the correct quadrant.
In our case the two values are,
π π 2π
θ1 = − θ2 = − +π =
3 3 3

The first one is in quadrant four and the second one is in quadrant two and so is the
one that we’re after. Therefore, the principal value of the argument is,
2π
Arg z =
3

© Paul Dawkins – 19 –
Complex Number Primer Polar & Exponential Form

and all possible values of the argument are then

2π
arg z = + 2πn n = 0, ±1, ±2, . . .
3

Now, let’s actually do what we were originally asked to do. Here is the polar form of
√
z = −1 + i 3.     
2π 2π
z = 2 cos + i sin
3 3

Now, for the sake of completeness we should acknowledge that there are many more
equally valid polar forms for this complex number. To get any of the other forms we
just need to compute a different value of the argument by picking n. Here are a couple
of other possible polar forms.
    
8π 8π
z = 2 cos + i sin n=1
3 3
    
16π 16π
z = 2 cos − + i sin − n = −3
3 3

(b) z = −9
In this case we’ve already noted that the principal value of a negative real number is π
so we don’t need to compute that. For completeness sake here are all possible values
of the argument of any negative number.

arg z = π + 2πn = π (1 + 2n) n = 0, ±1, ±2, . . .

Now, r is,
√
r = |z| = 81 + 0 = 9

The polar form (using the principal value) is,

z = 9 cos (π) + i sin (π)

Note that if we’d had a positive real number the principal value would be Arg z = 0

© Paul Dawkins – 20 –
Complex Number Primer Polar & Exponential Form

(c) z = 12 i
This another special case much like real numbers. If we were to use Equation 33
to find the argument we would run into problems since the real part is zero and this
would give division by zero. However, all we need to do to get the argument is think
about where this complex number is in the complex plane. In the complex plane purely
imaginary numbers are either on the positive y-axis or the negative y-axis depending
on the sign of the imaginary part.
For our case the imaginary part is positive and so this complex number will be on
the positive y-axis. Therefore, the principal value and the general argument for this
complex number is,
 
π π 1
Argz = arg z = + 2πn = π + 2n n = 0, ±1, ±2, . . .
2 2 2

Also, in this case r = 12 and so the polar form (again using the principal value) is,
 π   π 
z = 12 cos + i sin
2 2

Exponential Form
Now that we’ve discussed the polar form of a complex number we can introduce the second alter-
nate form of a complex number. First, we’ll need Euler’s formula,

ei θ = cos(θ) + i sin(θ) (36)

With Euler’s formula we can rewrite the polar form of a complex number into its exponential form
as follows.
z = rei θ
where θ = arg z and so we can see that, much like the polar form, there are an infinite number of
possible exponential forms for a given complex number. Also, because any two arguments for a
give complex number differ by an integer multiple of 2π we will sometimes write the exponential
form as,
z = rei (θ+2πn) n = 0, ±1, ±2, . . .
where θ is any value of the argument although it is more often than not the principal value of the
argument.
To get the value of r we can either use Equation 32 to write the exponential form or we can take a
more direct approach. Let’s take the direct approach. Take the modulus of both sides and then do
a little simplification as follows,
p q
|z| = re = |r| e = |r| |cos(θ) + i sin(θ)| = r + 0 cos2 (θ) + sin2 (θ) = r
iθ iθ 2

and we see that r = |z|.

© Paul Dawkins – 21 –
Complex Number Primer Polar & Exponential Form

Note as well that because we can consider z = r (cos(θ) + i sin(θ)) as a parametric representation
of a circle of radius r and the exponential form of a complex number is really another way of writing
the polar form we can also consider z = rei θ a parametric representation of a circle of radius
r.
Now that we’ve got the exponential form of a complex number out of the way we can use this
along with basic exponent properties to derive some nice facts about complex numbers and their
arguments.
First, let’s start with the non-zero complex number z = rei θ . In the arithmetic section we gave
a fairly complex formula for the multiplicative inverse, however, with the exponential form of the
complex number we can get a much nicer formula for the multiplicative inverse.
 −1  −1 1
z −1 = rei θ = r−1 ei θ = r−1 e−i θ = ei (−θ)
r

Note that since r is a non-zero real number we know that r−1 = 1r . So, putting this together the
exponential form of the multiplicative inverse is,
1
z −1 = ei (−θ) (37)
r
and the polar form of the multiplicative inverse is,
1
z −1 = cos (−θ) + i sin (−θ)


(38)
r
We can also get some nice formulas for the product or quotient of complex numbers. Given two
complex numbers z1 = r1 ei θ 1 and z2 = r2 ei θ 2 , where θ1 is any value of arg z1 and θ2 is any value
of arg z2 , we have
  
z1 z2 = r1 ei θ 1 r2 ei θ 2 = r1 r2 ei (θ 1 +θ 2 ) (39)

z1 r1 ei θ 1 r1
= = ei (θ 1 − θ 2 ) (40)
z2 r2 ei θ 2 r2

The polar forms for both of these are,

z1 z2 = r1 r2 (cos (θ 1 + θ 2 ) + i sin (θ 1 + θ 2 )) (41)

z1 r1
= (cos (θ 1 − θ 2 ) + i sin (θ 1 − θ 2 )) (42)
z2 r2

We can also use Equation 39 and Equation 40 to get some nice facts about the arguments of a
product and a quotient of complex numbers. Since θ1 is any value of arg z1 and θ2 is any value of
arg z2 we can see that,
arg (z1 z2 ) = arg z1 + arg z2 (43)

 
z1
arg = arg z1 − arg z2 (44)
z2

© Paul Dawkins – 22 –
Complex Number Primer Powers and Roots

Note that Equation 43 and Equation 44 may or may not work if you use the principal value of the
argument, Arg z. For example, consider z1 = i and z2 = −1. In this case we have z1 z2 = −i and
the principal value of the argument for each is,
π π
Arg (i) = Arg (−1) = π Arg (−i) = −
2 2

However,
3π π
6= −
Arg (i) + Arg (−1) =
2 2
and so Equation 43 doesn’t hold if we use the principal value of the argument. Note however, if
we use,
π
arg (i) = arg (−1) = π
2
then,
3π
arg (i) + arg (−1) =
2
3π
is valid since 2 is a possible argument for -i, it just isn’t the principal value of the argument.
As an interesting side note, Equation 44 actually does work for this example if we use the principal
arguments. That won’t always happen, but it does in this case so be careful!
We will close this section with a nice fact about the equality of two complex numbers that we will
make heavy use of in the next section. Suppose that we have two complex numbers given by their
exponential forms, z1 = r1 ei θ 1 and z2 = r2 ei θ 2 . Also suppose that we know that z1 = z2 . In this
case we have,
r1 ei θ 1 = r2 ei θ 2

Then we will have z1 = z2 if and only if,

r1 = r2 and θ2 = θ1 + 2πk for some integer k (i.e. k = 0, ±1, ±2, . . .) (45)

Note that the phrase “if and only if” is a fancy mathematical phrase that means that if z1 = z2 is
true then so is Equation 45 and likewise, if Equation 45 is true then we’ll have z1 = z2 .
This may seem like a silly fact, but we are going to use this in the next section to help us find the
powers and roots of complex numbers.

6 Powers and Roots

In this section we’re going to take a look at a really nice way of quickly computing integer powers
and roots of complex numbers.
We’ll start with integer powers of z = reiθ since they are easy enough. If n is an integer then,
 n
z n = reiθ = rn ei nθ (46)

There really isn’t too much to do with powers other than working a quick example.

© Paul Dawkins – 23 –
Complex Number Primer Powers and Roots

Example 1
Compute (3 + 3i)5 .

Solution
Of course, we could just do this by multiplying the number out, but this would be time con-
suming and prone to mistakes. Instead we can convert to exponential form and then use
Equation 46 to quickly get the answer.
Here is the exponential form of 3 + 3i .
√ √ 3 π
r= 9+9=3 2 tan(θ) = ⇒ Arg z =
3 4
√ π
3 + 3i = 3 2ei 4

Note that we used the principal value of the argument for the exponential form, although we
didn’t have to.
Now, use Equation 46 to quickly do the computation.
 √ 5 5π
5
(3 + 3i) = 3 2 ei 4
√
    
5π 5π
= 972 2 cos + i sin
4 4
√ √ !
√ 2 2
= 972 2 − − i
2 2
= −972 − 972i

So, there really isn’t too much to integer powers of a complex number.
Note that if r = 1 then we have,

n
z n = eiθ = ei nθ and if we take the last two terms and convert to polar form we arrive at a
formula that is called de Moivre’s formula.

(cos(θ) + i sin(θ))n = cos (n θ) + i sin (n θ) n = 0, ±1, ±2, . . .

We now need to move onto computing roots of complex numbers. We’ll start this off “simple” by
finding the nth roots of unity. The nth roots of unity for n = 2, 3, . . . are the distinct solutions to the
equation,
zn = 1

Clearly (hopefully) z = 1 is one of the solutions. We want to determine if there are any other
solutions. To do this we will use the fact from the previous sections that states that z1 = z2 if and

© Paul Dawkins – 24 –
Complex Number Primer Powers and Roots

only if
r1 = r2 and θ2 = θ1 + 2πk for some integer k (i.e. k = 0, ±1, ±2, . . .)

So, let’s start by converting both sides of the equation to complex form and then computing the
power on the left side. Doing this gives,
 n
reiθ = 1 ei(0) ⇒ rn ei nθ = 1 ei(0)

So, according to the fact these will be equal provided,

rn = 1 nθ = 0 + 2πk k = 0, ±1, ±2, . . .

Now, r is a positive integer (by assumption of the exponential/polar form) and so solving gives,

2πk
r=1 θ= k = 0, ±1, ±2, . . .
n

The solutions to the equation are then,

 
2πk
z = exp i k = 0, ±1, ±2, . . .
n

Recall from our discussion on the polar form (and hence the exponential form) that these points
will lie on the circle of radius r. So, our points will lie on the unit circle and they will be equally
spaced on the unit circle at every 2π n radians. Note this also tells us that there are n distinct roots
corresponding to k = 0, 1, 2, . . . , n − 1 since we will get back to where we started once we reach
k=n
Therefore, there are n nth roots of unity and they are given by,
     
2πk 2πk 2πk
exp i = cos + i sin k = 0, 1, 2, . . . , n − 1 (47)
n n n

There is a simpler notation that is often used to denote nth roots of unity. First define,
 
2π
ωn = exp i (48)
n

then the nth roots of unity are,

  k  
2π 2πk
ωnk = exp i = exp i k = 0, 1, 2, . . . n − 1
n n

Or, more simply the nth roots of unity are,

1, ωn , ωn2 , . . . , ωnn−1 (49)

where ωn is defined in Equation 48.

© Paul Dawkins – 25 –
Complex Number Primer Powers and Roots

Example 2
Compute the nth roots of unity for n = 2, 3, and 4.

Solution
We’ll start with n = 2.  
2π
ω2 = exp i = ei π
2

This gives,

1=1 and ω2 = e i π
= cos (π) + i sin (π)
= −1

So, for n = 2 we have -1, and 1 as the nth roots of unity. This should not be too surprising
as all we were doing was solving the equation

z2 = 1

and we all know that -1 and 1 are the two solutions.

While the result for n = 2 may not be that surprising that for n = 3 may be somewhat surpris-
ing. In this case we are really solving
z3 = 1
and in the world of real numbers we know that the solution to this is z = 1. However, from the
work above we know that there are 3 nth roots of unity in this case. The problem here is that
the remaining two are complex solutions and so are usually not thought about when solving
for real solution to this equation which is generally what we wanted up to this point.
So, let’s go ahead and find the nth roots of unity for n = 3.
 
2π
ω3 = exp i
3

This gives,
   
2π 4π
1=1 ω3 = exp i ω32 = exp i
3 3
       
2π 2π 4π 4π
= cos + i sin = cos + i sin
3 3 3 3
√ √
1 3 1 3
=− + i =− − i
2 2 2 2

I’ll leave it to you to check that if you cube the last two values you will in fact get 1.

© Paul Dawkins – 26 –
Complex Number Primer Powers and Roots

Finally, let’s go through n = 4. We’ll do this one much quicker than the previous cases.
 
2π  π
ω4 = exp i = exp i
4 2

This gives,
 π  
3π
1=1 ω4 = exp i ω42 = exp (i π) ω43 = exp i
2 2
=i = −1 = −i

Now, let’s move on to more general roots. First let’s get some notation out of the way. We’ll define
1/n
z0 to be any number that will satisfy the equation

z n = z0 (50)

1/n
To find the values of z0 we’ll need to solve this equation and we can do that in the same way
that we found the nth roots of unity. So, if r0 = |z0 | and θ0 = arg z0 (note θ0 can be any value of
the argument, but we usually use the principal value) we have,
 n
reiθ = r0 ei θ0 ⇒ rn ei nθ = r0 ei θ0

So, this tells us that,

√ θ0 2πk
r= n
r0 θ= + k = 0, ±1, ±2, . . .
n n

The distinct solutions to Equation 50 are then,

  
√ θ0 2πk
ak = r0 exp i
n
+ k = 0, 1, 2, . . . , n − 1 (51)
n n

So, we can see that just as there were n nth roots of unity there are also n nth roots of z0 .
Finally, we can again simplify the notation up a little. If a is any of the nth roots of z0 then all the
roots can be written as,
a, aωn , aωn2 , . . . , , aωnn−1
where ωn is defined in Equation 48.

© Paul Dawkins – 27 –
Complex Number Primer Powers and Roots

Example 3
Compute all values of the following.
1
(a) (2i) 2

√
1
(b) 3 −i 3

Solution
1
(a) (2i) 2
The first thing to do is write down the exponential form of the complex number we’re
taking the root of.  π
2i = 2 exp i
2
π
So, if we use θ0 = 2 we can use Equation 51 to write down the roots.
√  π 
ak = 2 exp i + πk k = 0, 1
4

Plugging in for k gives,

√ √
 π   
5π
a0 = 2 exp i a1 = 2 exp i
4 4
√  √
π   π      
5π 5π
= 2 cos + i sin = 2 cos + i sin
4 4 4 4
=1+i = −1 − i

I’ll leave it to you to check that if you square both of these will get 2 i.

√
1
(b) 3 −i 3
Here’s the exponential form of the number,
√   π 
3 − i = 2 exp i −
6

Using Equation 51 the roots are,

√
  
3 π 2πk
ak = 2 exp i − + k = 0, 1, 2
18 3

© Paul Dawkins – 28 –
Complex Number Primer Powers and Roots

Plugging in for k gives,

√
3
  π  √ 
3
 π  π 
a0 = 2 exp i − = 2 cos − + i sin − = 1.24078 − 0.21878 i
18 18 18
√ √
      
3 11π 3 11π 11π
a1 = 2 exp i = 2 cos + i sin = −0.43092 + 1.18394 i
18 18 18
√ √
      
3 23π 3 23π 23π
a2 = 2 exp i = 2 cos + i sin = −0.80986 − 0.96516 i
18 18 18

As with the previous part I’ll leave it to you to check that if you cube each of these you
√
will get 3 − i .

© Paul Dawkins – 29 –