Petrophysical Analysis of Well Logs and Core Sampl
Petrophysical Analysis of Well Logs and Core Sampl
Petrophysical Analysis of Well Logs and Core Sampl
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10420-x
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Received: 6 December 2020 / Accepted: 15 April 2022 / Published online: 18 June 2022
© The Author(s) 2022
Abstract
Understanding basic petrophysical properties may enhance the recovery of residual oil saturation and help in reservoir man-
agement. Reservoir oil saturation is the fraction of the porosity of a zone occupied by oil. The trapping may increase with
the increase of porosity. Oil reservoirs represent a significant fraction of the reservoirs in the world-wide. We try to make a
reservoir evaluation using petrophysical analysis of well logs and core samples at Issaran Field, South Gharib Formation,
West of the Gulf of Suez, southeast Egypt. This area was heavily influenced by the structural setting of the Gulf of Suez’s
central province, which is characterized by major SW dipping faults with a regional stratigraphic dip toward the NE. The
high structural blocks are located in the center of the research area, and the low structural region is located in the southwest.
South Gharib Formation is primarily composed of carbonates with few sulfates that grade upwards into sulfate-rich beds in
the upper part. Laminated dolomitic limestone, with evaporites grades, changes downward into laminated dolomitic lime-
stone and marly limestone, in the lower part. The anhydrite and dolomite units near the bottom have spotty oil stains. The
structural setup is continued by the spread and deposition of this formation. We try to make analytical examination, of some
reservoirs, accomplished by analyzing both well log data and core rock samples, vertically and laterally. According to the
study of the horizontal permeability to vertical permeability ratio (Permeability anisotropy; 𝜆k ), the reservoir is laminated
rock ( 𝜆k = 1.1 − 5 ), with a few data samples nearly isotropic ( 𝜆k = 1∕1.1–1.1) and fractured ( 𝜆k = 1∕2.5–1/1.1). Reservoir
data histograms show that the most typical values of the data are 20–30% oil saturation and 7–10% porosity. The net-pay
zone varies from four to 71 feet at different depths (897–1414 feet). Due to low shale content, water saturation, high effec-
tive porosity values, hydrocarbon saturation, may show higher net-pay thickness. These results may help to enhance the
oil recovery. The area in the middle of the research area is suggested for future hydrocarbon development and using more
petrophysical analysis.
Keywords South Gharib reservoir · Petrophysical characterization · Hydrocarbon saturation · Shale content · Isoparametric
maps · Gulf of Suez
Introduction
13
Vol.:(0123456789)
Geologic setting
The Gulf of Suez rift is divided into three major units that
are organized from bottom to top as pre-rift, syn-rift, and
post-rift sedimentary periods (Fig. 2). Precambrian base-
ment rocks, Nubia Sandstone, Nezzazat Group (mixed-facies
portion), and broad carbonate layer make up the pre-rift
sedimentary sequence. This sedimentary sequence ascends
stratigraphically as Uppermost Cretaceous chalk, Paleocene
shale, and Eocene limestones.
A red-bed clastic part of Abu Zenima Formation (Oligo-
cene–Early Miocene age) covers Miocene sediments with
two facies. The first facies is a clastic-dominant section of
the Nukhul, Rudeis, and Kareem Formations, and the second
Fig. 1 Location map showing the studied wells and seismic sections, is an evaporate-rich layer that is largely anhydrite and salt
Issaran Field, Gulf of Suez, Egypt (Belayim, South Gharib and Zeit formations). Finally, car-
bonate and clastic sediments are found in post-rift deposits
(Abul-Nasr 1990; Garfunkel and Bartov 1977). The Miocene
latitudes 28 44′ 4.26"–28 45′ 22.40" N. (Fig. 1). It is roughly portion covers peripheral facies in the Issaran Field region,
140 km south of Suez City and about 50 km northwest of which primarily consists of five reservoir zones organized
Ras Gharib Oil Field. The studied region is geomorpho- from top to bottom as Zeit sand, South Gharib, two dolo-
logically defined as the clysmic gulf, with slightly NW–SE mite units (Belayim comparable), Gharandal, and Nukhul
trending, taphrogenic (rift producing), and regenerated Formations. The core investigation reveals that the South
depression (EGPC 1996; Alsharhan 2003). The tectonic Gharib Formation is primarily composed of carbonates with
history of the Gulf of Suez rift system resulted in the super- few sulfates, which grade upward into sulfate-rich beds in
position of two distinct sedimentary units: (1) pre-rift sedi- the upper part, and laminated dolomitic limestone with
ments (Pre-Miocene) deposited prior to normal block fault- evaporites, which grades downward into laminated dolo-
ing, and (2) syn-rift deposition during rifting. Because of mitic limestone and marly limestone in the lower part. In the
13
Fig. 2 Simplified stratigraphic section of the Suez rift with detailed Syn-rift Miocene stratigraphic section of the Issaran Field (Modified after
Saoudi et al. 2014)
base anhydrite and dolomite units, there is patchy oil stain- intertidal, shallow lagoonal and supratidal sabkha cycles.
ing (Scimictar 2009).The depositional environment of the South Gharib Formation rests conformably under the Zeit
South Gharib Formation could be differentiated into seven Formation and unconformably above the top dolomitic rock
zones. These zones are arranged from base to top as shal- layer (Fig. 2).
low subtidal, shallow lagoonal, intertidal, shallow lagoonal,
13
13
13
Fig. 8 Interpreted (SW–NE) Seismic line (L 12,070) showing formation tops of the syn-rift Miocene rocks and structural elements in the study
area of Issaran oil Field
Structural setting of the Issaran Field the lateral principal seals for the trapping of hydrocarbons,
and the most productive wells occur inside the field around
The structural setting of the Gulf of Suez is controlled by the faults (Scimitar 2009). The traps found in the research
two major alignments: the clysmic trend, which is directed region are classified as stratigraphic, structural, or combi-
northwest–southeast and follows the Gulf of Suez, and the nation traps (Saoudi et al. 2014). Selected twenty depth-
Aqaba trend, which is oriented northeast–southwest and par- domain seismic lines traversing the research region were
allels the Gulf of Aqaba (Robson 1971; Khalil and Mesheref chosen to identify features and clarify the structure of whole
1988; EGPC 1996).The structure of the central province of areas. Along these sections, a collection of normal faults is
the Gulf of Suez has a greater impact on the study region, detected, with structural throws mostly to the SW but a few
with significant faults dipping toward the southwest SW structures dipping to the NE, forming tilted fault blocks with
and strata dipping toward the NE (Fig. 7).It is classified step-like faults that encircled a small graben. The structural
as a tilted fault block with a massive downthrown block to contour map constructed on top of the South Gharib Forma-
the southwest and a normal fault on the southwest flank. tion is defined as a tilted fault block. This fault block has a
The downthrown normal fault block is often to the south- significant downthrown block to the SW that is separated by
west and displaces oil–water contacts (EGPC 1996). The a NW–SE fault (clysmic trend) in the west and N–S oriented
region was shaped by a complicated tectonic history and faults generating trap structures in the NE half (Emad 2019;
a sequence of extensional releases during the Eocene and Gomaa and Sedeek 2021; Gomaa et al. 2020; Gomaa 2020
Miocene epochs. The area is dominated by fault connec- Gomaa et al. 2019). The high structural blocks can be found
tion and growth structure occurrences. The fault creates in the center of the research area between fault 3 (F3) and
13
Fig. 9 Depth map drawn on top of the South Gharib Formation, Issaran Field, Western shore of the Gulf of Suez, Egypt, C. I. = 100 ft, (After
Emad 2019)
fault 5 (F5), while the low structural region can be found in numerous litho-saturation cross plots (CPI).The litho-sat-
the southwestern half of the study area between fault 1 (F1) uration cross plot of the studied wells shows that the shale
and fault 3 (F3) (Figs. 8, 9). content of the South Gharib reservoir (Upper Miocene)
oscillates by an average amount not exceeding 16 percent
along the studied section, and the porosity is not greater than
Discussion and results 30 percent with mean values equal to 7 percent in all studied
wells. It is obvious from the dramatic rise in resistivity val-
The work's findings are mostly based on a petrophysical ues caused by cementation or compaction in the absence of
study of the South Gharib reservoir. This is illustrated verti- water content under this situation (Ali et al. 2019).Because
cally by litho-saturation cross plots, which show the overall of the cyclic steam injection project in this field, water satu-
nature of the analyzed wells’ petrophysical properties in ration has reached 70% on average. Significant incidences
terms of porosity, fluid saturation, and lithology fractiona- of hydrocarbon saturation (heavy oil) are found along the
tion. These data are supported by CSS-38 well core sample examined reservoir (Fig. 10).The histograms of core samples
analysis (Core No. 1: 960.00'–1021.06' = 61.5 feet, Core from the CSS-38 well show that 20–30% of oil saturation
No. 2: 1021.06'–1066.00' = 44.5 feet), and represented by ( So ) is the dominant value with a median value of 22.4 per-
literally constructing from a group of iso-parametric maps cent and an arithmetical value of 21.8 (Fig. 11A), whereas
including iso-shaliness, iso-effective porosity, net-pay thick- 7–10% is the common porosity value with a median value
ness, hydrocarbon, and water saturation. of 9 percent and an arithmetical value of 11.7 in the studied
reservoir (Fig. 11B).
Vertical variation of petrophysical parameters The laboratory examination of the core samples indicates
that the porosities documented in the carbonate layers are
Litho‑saturation cross plots (CPI) mostly of the linked inter-crystalline type, particularly in
the dolomitized portions, and predominantly of the uncon-
The vertical distribution of the analyzed reservoir's petro- nected moldic type in beds rich in bioclasts or fossils. Minor
physical properties is illustrated by the production of unconnected inter-crystalline holes can be seen contained
13
Fig. 10 Litho-saturation cross plot of South Gharib Formation in CSS-38 well, southern Issaran Field, Gulf of Suez, Egypt
between anhydrite or gypsum laths, although significantly the lithology of anhydrite, dolomite, and limestone. The
more typically linked inter-crystalline pores can be seen in grain density rises as the bulk density rises, until the cor-
carbonate stringers enclosed between nodules. Minor quan- relation coefficient between them reaches r = 0.64 (Fig. 13).
tities of fracture porosity are also observed, particularly in
dolomite and calcite strata. In the carbonate and evaporitic – Permeability ( k)
strata, replacements by secondary fibrous rose gypsum, por-
phyritic anhydrite, and gypsum blocked the porosity. The The permeability is tested in two dimensions in the labo-
laboratory study revealed that there were low to moderate ratory to demonstrate the uniformity of the examined reser-
levels of hydrocarbons present (Fig. 12). voir in horizontal and vertical directions. Permeability meas-
urements vary from 1.4 to 84 md in the horizontal direction,
Integration of petrophysical parameters with an average of 6.5 md. In the vertical direction, it varies
from 0.8 to 54 md, with an average of 4.26 md. For the CSS-
The petrophysical measurement findings of the analyzed 38 well, the relation coefficient (r) between horizontal and
core samples are combined to understand reservoir proper- vertical core permeabilities is 0.65, indicating a heteroge-
ties, which are graphically depicted shortly below; neous reservoir impacted by diagenetic processes. Further-
more, the horizontal permeability to vertical permeability
– Bulk density ( 𝜌b ) and grain density ( 𝜌g) ratios (Permeability Anisotropy; λk) are thought to reflect
the texture of the rock, with the majority of plotted points
The bulk density of the examined reservoir varied from being close to laminated rock ( 𝜆k = 1.1–5), and a few points
2.79 to 3.04 gm/cc, with an average of 2.88 gm/cc, reflecting
13
The effective porosity map reveals that the values vary from
10.3 percent in the CSS-288 well to 18.7 percent in the CSS-
347 well and steadily rise toward the south, indicating that
there are no abnormalities in the studied region (Fig. 16A).
The primary variables influencing the porosity distribution
within the examined reservoir are the sedimentary facies and
post-diagenetic processes (Fig. 12).
Iso‑shaliness map
13
Fig. 12 Porosity types of South Gharib reservoir; A Partly connected Inter-crystalline porosity, Depth: 1031.11 ft. E Dissolved pelletal
inter-crystalline, Depth: 1022.07 ft. B Disconnected inter-crystalline, dolomitic L.st. causing connected inter-granular porosity, Depth:
Depth: 1026.06 ft. C Micro-facture porosity, Depth: 1028.05 ft. D 1038.05 ft. F Moldic porosity, Depth: 1042.07 ft
the center of the research region and decrease outward for hydrocarbon accumulations, confirming the relationship
(Fig. 16D).Finally, the South Gharib Formation exhibits a between hydrocarbon potentiality and the structural setting
large number of pay zone intervals. of the study area (Fig. 16E).
The net-pay thickness distribution map shows that it ranges The isochore map shows that the thickness of the South
from 3.9 ft (ISS-100 well) to 71.1 ft (CSS-38 well), with the Gharib Formation gradually from southern parts toward
middle portion of the studied area being the most favorable northwestern parts, with no anomalous trend in thickness
13
2.70
Quartz, σg= 2.65
2.65
2.60
2.55
1.60 1.70 1.80 1.90 2.00 2.10 2.20 2.30 2.40 2.50 2.60 2.70 2.80 2.90 3.00
Bulk Density, σb (g/cm3)
Fig. 14 Horizontal permeability
(Kh) versus vertical perme-
ability (Kv) of the South Gharib
reservoir, southern Issaran
Filed, Gulf of Suez, Egypt
is observed in the studied area, and the depocenter of the area close to the downthrown side of major faults. Gener-
studied formation lies in the northwestern part of the study ally, the distribution and deposition of the studied formation
13
B
Conclusion
13
3180600
A
3180600
B
3180200
3180200 Phi
CSS-288 (%) CSS-288 Vsh
(%)
3180000 3180000
19
18.5
19
ISS-94 18 ISS-94
3179800 17.5 3179800
17 17.5
16.5
16
16
3179600 CSS-38 15.5 3179600 CSS-38
15
14.5 14.5
14
3179400 13.5 3179400
13
13
12.5
12 11.5
3179200 CSS-347 11.5 3179200 CSS-347
11
10
10.5 0 200 400 m
0 200 400 m
10
3179000 9.5 3179000 8.5
475000 475200 475400 475600 475800 476000 476200 476400 476600 475000 475200 475400 475600 475800 476000 476200 476400 476600
D
3180600
C
3180600
3180200 3180200
CSS-288 Sw CSS-288 So
(%) (%)
3180000 3180000
19.7 85.7
18.2 84.2
17.2 83.2
15.7 81.7
3179200 CSS-347 3179200 CSS-347
15.2 81.2
0 200 400 m
0 200 400 m 80.7
14.7
F
3180600
E
3180600
3180200
Net 3180200
CSS-288
pay CSS-288 Thick.
(ft) (ft)
3180000 3180000
75
70 194
ISS-94 ISS-94
3179800 65 3179800
60 172
55
50 150
3179600 CSS-38 3179600 CSS-38
45
40 128
35
3179400 3179400
30 106
25
20 84
3179200 CSS-347 15 3179200 CSS-347
10 62
0 200 400 m 0 200 400 m
5
3179000 0 3179000 40
475000 475200 475400 475600 475800 476000 476200 476400 476600 475000 475200 475400 475600 475800 476000 476200 476400 476600
13
Acknowledgements I would like to send a great thanks to the Egyptian as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source,
General Petroleum Corporation (EGPC) and Scimitar Production Egypt provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes
Ltd. for great helpful and providing me the required data. were made. The images or other third party material in this article are
included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated
Funding Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in
and Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not
Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB). permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will
need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a
copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Declarations
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attri- Abul-Nasr RA (1990) Re-evaluation of the upper eocene rock units
bution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adapta- in west central Sinai, Egypt Ain Shams Univ, Earth Sci Series
tion, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long 4 234 247
13
Ali M, Khan MJ, Ali M, Iftikhar S (2019) Petrophysical analysis of Gomaa MM, Elnasharty M, Rizzo E (2019) Electrical properties
well logs for reservoir evaluation: a case study of BKadanwari speculation of contamination by water and gasoline on sand
gas field, middle Indus basin, Pakistan Arab J Geosci 12 215 12 and clay composite. Arab J Geosci. https://doi.org/10.1007/
Alsharhan AS (2003) Petroleum geology and potential hydrocarbon s12517-019-4767-4
plays in the Gulf of Suez rift basin, Egypt AAPG Bull 87 143 180 Gomaa MM, Melegy A, Metwally H, Hassan S (2020) Geochemical
Amaefule JO et al (1993) Enhanced reservoir description: using core and electrical characterization of heavy metals in contaminated
and log data to identify hydraulic (flow) units and predict perme- soils. Heliyon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04954
ability in uncored intervals/wells. In: SPE annual technical confer- Gomaa MM, Elshenawy A, Basheer A, Kotb A, Moawad M (2021)
ence and exhibition, Houston, Oct 1993, pp 205–220. https://doi. Electrical properties of a dry mixture of sand and shale. The
org/10.2118/26436-MS 6th Int Conf Eng Geophy, 25–28 Oct 2021, Virtual Conference,
Ammar AI, Gomaa MM, Kamal KA (2021) Applying of SP, DC- Al Ain, UAE, P10, p 299–302. https://doi.org/10.1190/iceg2
Resistivity, DC-TDIP and TDEM soundings in high saline coastal 021-076.1
aquifer. Heliyon 7(7):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon. Khalil B, Mesheref WM (1988) Hydrocarbon occurrences and struc-
2021.e07617 tural style of the southern Suez rift basin, Egypt 9th Petrol Expl
Burke JA, Campbell RL, Schmidt AW (1969) The litho-porosity cross Prod Conf, EGPC Cairo, Egypt 1 86 109
plot a method of determining rock characteristics for computation Nazeer A, Abbasi SA, Solangi SH (2016) Sedimentary facies interpre-
of log data. In: Paper presented at the SPE Illinois Basin Regional tation of gamma ray (GR) log as basic well logs in Central and
Meeting, Evansville, Indiana, Oct 1969. https://doi.org/10.2118/ lower indus basin of Pakistan Geodesy Geodyn 7 432 443 https://
2771-MS doi.org/10.1016/j.geog.2016.06.006
Cudjoe S, Vinassa M, Gomes JH, Barati R (2016) A comprehensive Patton TL, Moustafa AR, Nelson RA, Abdine AS (1994) Tectonic
approach to sweet-spot mapping for hydraulic fracturing and CO2 evaluation and structural setting of Gulf of Suez rift SM Lon-
huff-n-puff injection in chattanooga shale formation. J Nat Gas don Eds Interior rift basin 59 American association of petroleum
Sci Eng 33:1201–1218 Geologists USA 9 55
Emad AA (2019) Seismic and petrophysical analysis for detecting Pickett GR (1973) Pattern recognition as a mean of formation evalu-
hydrocarbon occurrences of the fractured dolomite reservoir in ation. Paper A in 14th annual Logging symposium transactions:
Issaran Field, Western Shore of the Gulf of Suez, Egypt. Ph.D. society of professional well log analysis, paper A 1–21
Al Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt Robson DA (1971) The structural of the Gulf of Suez clysmic rift with
Emad AA, Gomaa MM (2022) Electrical properties of sedimentary special reference to the Eastern side J Geol Soc 127 247 276
microfacies and depositional environment deduced from core Saoudi A, Moustafa AR, Farag RI, Omara MM, Wally H, Fouad A, Tag
analysis of the syn-rift sediments, Northwestern shore of Gulf of A, Ragab RZ. (2014) Dual-porosity fractured miocene syn-rift
Seuz, Egypt. J Pet Explor Prod Technol, in print dolomite reservoir in the Issaran Field (Gulf of Suez, Egypt): a
Egyptian general petroleum corporation (1996). Gulf of Suez oil and case history of the zonal isolation of highly fractured water car-
gas fields, a comprehensive overview. Cairo, Egypt 520–528 rier bed Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 374,
Garfunkel RL, Bartov Y (1977) The tectonic of the suez rift: geological first published on September 5, 2012, doi:https://doi.org/10.1144/
survey of Israel Bulletin 71 1 44 SP374.7
Gomaa MM (2020) Kaolinite under pressure at audio frequency range Scimitar company, Egypt (2009) Special core analysis study, Issaran
and its electrical features NRIAG J Astronomy Geophys 9 1 176 Field-Egypt. Internal reports
189 Schlumberger (1972) Log interpretation, charts. Stumberger limited,
Gomaa MM (2021a) Grain shape and texture effect on electrical New York, NY 10017, USA, p 92
characterization of semi-conductor semi-insulator mixture Arab Schlumberger (1984) Log interpretation charts, schlumberger well
J Geosci, Special Issue Geol Africa, 9th and 10th Conf, Egypt. services, USA, p 285
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-08517-x Schlumberger (1989) Log interpretation principles and applications,
Gomaa MM (2021b) Using electrical properties of some subsurface p 241
sedimentary rocks as a tool to detect bedding direction J Earth Schlumberger (1998) Schlumberger log interpretation principle-appli-
Space Phys 46 4 13 26 ISSN: 2538-3906 cations. Schlumberger educational services, Houston, Texas, p
Gomaa MM (2022) Frequency response of electrical properties of some 222
granite samples physics J Earth Space Phys 47 4 75 86
Gomaa MM, Sedeek H (2021) Prediction of heterogeneity and ani- Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to
sotropy of oxidised pyrite crystals using electrical measurements jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
NRIAG J Astronomy Geophys 10 1 244 257
13
1. use such content for the purpose of providing other users with access on a regular or large scale basis or as a means to circumvent access
control;
2. use such content where to do so would be considered a criminal or statutory offence in any jurisdiction, or gives rise to civil liability, or is
otherwise unlawful;
3. falsely or misleadingly imply or suggest endorsement, approval , sponsorship, or association unless explicitly agreed to by Springer Nature in
writing;
4. use bots or other automated methods to access the content or redirect messages
5. override any security feature or exclusionary protocol; or
6. share the content in order to create substitute for Springer Nature products or services or a systematic database of Springer Nature journal
content.
In line with the restriction against commercial use, Springer Nature does not permit the creation of a product or service that creates revenue,
royalties, rent or income from our content or its inclusion as part of a paid for service or for other commercial gain. Springer Nature journal
content cannot be used for inter-library loans and librarians may not upload Springer Nature journal content on a large scale into their, or any
other, institutional repository.
These terms of use are reviewed regularly and may be amended at any time. Springer Nature is not obligated to publish any information or
content on this website and may remove it or features or functionality at our sole discretion, at any time with or without notice. Springer Nature
may revoke this licence to you at any time and remove access to any copies of the Springer Nature journal content which have been saved.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, Springer Nature makes no warranties, representations or guarantees to Users, either express or implied
with respect to the Springer nature journal content and all parties disclaim and waive any implied warranties or warranties imposed by law,
including merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose.
Please note that these rights do not automatically extend to content, data or other material published by Springer Nature that may be licensed
from third parties.
If you would like to use or distribute our Springer Nature journal content to a wider audience or on a regular basis or in any other manner not
expressly permitted by these Terms, please contact Springer Nature at