ISSN 2349-7831

International Journal of Recent Research in Social Sciences and Humanities (IJRRSSH)

Vol. 2, Issue 2, pp: (14-18), Month: April 2015 - June 2015, Available at: www.paperpublications.org

Ethics and Religion

Shefali Naranje

1. INTRODUCTION

Ethics and Religion go side by side, is what a person will say to clarify on this subject. So the question arises as to why
one needs to be ethical or religious, or in other words why everyone wants a label of being good and just or term
themselves as ethical or religious.Most of the moral philosophers would say this is not the case,yet it can really be helpful
to understand this concept. This means that people can maintain certain ethical perspectives,principles and behavior
without engaging oneself in religious or spiritual beliefs, institutions, or practices.
Ethics, or moral philosophy as we say, asks some very fundamental questions of how human beings should live: what
goals and values should one strive for, what is right and what is wrong, what is virtuous and what is wicked.On the other
hand Religion can be understood as a belief system that gives meaning to people's lives and professes their existence, the
ultimate supremacy of a supernatural power or a divine realm that transcends the material reality of the day-to-day life.
The realms of ethics and religious belief do overlap but are not identical. Mostly though not all religions provide their
faithful way of carrying out the instructions to give guidance as to ethical conduct. Much to say but by no means all
moral philosophy has roots in or connections to religious belief.

2. ETHICS AND ITS REVEALATION

Many religious systems adopt a super-naturalist, or God-based, ethics. The deity or some natural power or an idol is the
only source of moral rules, and people must do what God wants, to lead a good and prosperous life. God speaks directly
to people through the prophets and recorded texts. This approach is notable in the Abrahamic religions: Judaism,
Christianity and Islam. God's rules are passed directly to the people and recorded in the holy scriptures. The Ten
Commandments of Moses, much of Christ's preaching in the Gospels and many of the Quran's ayats and suras are such
direct teachings concerning ethical conduct. Hindu Vedas are another example of a words of the deity revealed directly.
Interpretation of Ethics:
Direct communication from the deity is only one way religions teach about ethics. The best ways to live one's life and
solve moral dilemmas are explored indirectly in many sacred books and texts of religious significance, from the Hindu
epic Ramayana to the whole tradition of Christian apologetics to the Taoist Tao Te Ching. Besides the written word, the
priests, monks and teachers of most religions, from the Zen Buddhist gurus to Judaistic rabbis are considered to be moral
authorities, who are able to provide with ethical guidance through their deep understanding and study of the spiritual
realm and their devotion to God.
But still the Question arises why be Good:
Most people would agree that one should lead a good life, whatever the definition of the good life their particular belief
systems or religion proposes. There is less agreement on actually why this is desirable. A supernaturalist approach
dominates the Abrahamic religions and refers to God's will as the ultimate moral authority:It generally states that people
should do what God desires, and what God desires is always good. This still leaves the problem of finding out what does
God actually wants us to do? This is then usually approached through a combination of routes, from sacred texts or holy
words to spiritual authorities and individual's direct communication with God. Such rules of conduct are usually quite
specific and absolute in almost all religions and transgressions of any of this means a punishment, often in the afterlife.
Other religious systems, for example Taoism, Zen Buddhist or Shinto, concentrate on the general principles that help one

Page | 14
Paper Publications
 ISSN 2349-7831

International Journal of Recent Research in Social Sciences and Humanities (IJRRSSH)

Vol. 2, Issue 2, pp: (14-18), Month: April 2015 - June 2015, Available at: www.paperpublications.org

attain spiritual balance. The ethical rules are seen as supplement than as absolute prescriptions and is considered more of
an expression of the best way to progress on the spiritual journey.

3. ETHICS WITHOUT RELIGION

Much moral philosophy is rooted in religious belief, although some secular ethics have a tradition going back to the
ancient times. Many thinkers who subscribed to some form of a religious belief system recognize that it is possible to live
a good life without recourse to religion. That includes the Apostle Paul in the New Testament and the current Dalai Lama,
who called for promotion of universal “human values” with “no relationship with any particular religion.” Although it is
clear that atheists can live ethical existence, the difficulty they grapple with is to find out justification for their ethics, the
question of where the morality ultimately comes from. The most common answer point to this is to share social
convention and the universal human nature which are its evolutionary roots.
On the other hand religion and Religious organizations and practices have a wide variety of comprehensive services,
programming, groups, lectures, readings, models, and so forth that can regularly impart, support, and provide corrective
feedback about ethical principles and guidelines to their members. The secular community just doesn't seem to have the
organizational structure to do so. There are some exceptions of course to these situations.These groups highlight virtues
such as honesty, integrity, and responsibility. So, it appears that one doesn't have to be religious or spiritual to be ethical
but it might help having the organizational structure that religion offers to encourage and reinforce ethical principles and
behavior. On the other hand Religious engagement and practices encourages and supports "clean and clear living."
Research has consistently found that religious people are less likely to engage in criminal behavior, like marital
infidelity,alcoholism,murder,rape etc to some extent,but on the contrary will engage themselves in social behaviors such
as volunteerism and charityeg.Mother Terresa. In a nutshell,to say people in the church choir usually don't do criminal
conspiracy.Harold Koenig's Handbook of Religion andHealth as well as his Handbook of Religion and Mental Health are
examples for this scholarly support.
Religion and spirituality encourages ethical behavior in their sacred scripture readings.The point is that, research supports
the view that spiritual and religious practices like, meditation, Church sponsored social ministries, religious services talks
have certain physical, mental, community health, and ethical benefits.
Of course there are many examples of religious beliefs and practices being terribly harmful to oneself and others in the
society, and there are many examples of outstanding non religious and completely secular organizations and individuals
who are outstanding models for ethical behavior, community engagement, and physical and mental health. So, there are
exception to these general principles for sure but the overall trend suggests that religion does assist and support people in
living more ethically.
So, to answer the question, "do we need religion to be ethical?" The answer appears to be no but it could be helpful under
the right circumstances.
According to Mathew Arnold, "Religion is nothing but morality touched with emotion." This view does not; in anyway,
distinguish between religion and ethics.
In Samuel Alexander's words, "There is infact no duty to be religious any more than there is a duty to be hungry."
Religion is a very natural human tendency and it may take any form of manifestation. Thus from the above statement, it is
inferred that religion is based upon emotion but ethical sense is based upon reason. People who believe in the identity of
religion and ethics should forget their differences.

4. RELIGION AND MORALITY

Scholars like Descartes, Locke, Paley believe that religion precedes morality, that the latter arises from the former. It is
God's will which decides what is good or bad.
God's laws are the ethical laws. God himself creates ethics of his own desire and is not bound by any other ethical law.
God himself is a source of treasure house for ethical qualities. He receives good and rejects evil. Ethics is based not on his
absolute desire but on his ethical nature.

Page | 15
Paper Publications
 ISSN 2349-7831

International Journal of Recent Research in Social Sciences and Humanities (IJRRSSH)

Vol. 2, Issue 2, pp: (14-18), Month: April 2015 - June 2015, Available at: www.paperpublications.org

Activities are not good or bad because religious texts say so. It is the goodness or badness of activities to know what
pleases God. Therefore neither religion nor ethics can stay in the world if God is believed to be either unethical or
different in morality.
Religion satisfies the emotional aspect of man whereas Ethics satisfies the volitional aspect of man. If the complete and all
round development of man is desirable, ethics and religion should be complementary.

5. RELIGION SUCCEEDS MORALITY

According to Kant the philosopher, religion is mostly based upon ethics and the existence of God is due to existence of
ethics. Kant believes that happiness invariably accompanies the virtue of goodness to complete it. Thus virtue is the
ultimate good but without happiness or joy it is not complete good.
But in the ultimate analysis virtues are not always accompanied by happiness. It is seen quite often that while good people
suffer in a number of ways, and most of the times, the bad enjoys themselves throughout. But if the ethical order is true it
should not be so.
Thus, Kant imagines that God is the one who arranges virtue with pleasure and vice with pain in this world. It is God
who conjoins pleasure with virtue.We may see this or not but it is true. Thus according to Kant, God is a postulate of
ethics.

6. THE BASIS OF RELIGION AND ETHICS ARE TOTALLY DIFFERENT

God exists not only in the soul but also in the world created by him. It is this urge for realisation of God, the first step
towards an ethical attitude.
Thus a person trying to be ethical must serve all living beings because all the living beings are God's creation. In this way,
as the author of Gita has said, God is the source of moral obligation.
The basis of moral obligation cannot be man or society. The individual is the source of moral obligation when he realises
the true soul. When the soul is truly recognised, no difference remains between that soul and god; everything in the world
appears to be Godly in nature. At that stage man himself becomes ethical. Moral obligation becomes the normal law of
everything internal and external.
In such stage the volitions of the individual become identical with God's will. But this does not destroy his freedom. Real
freedom lies in becoming God's instrument and fulfilling God’s will. This is true religion in itself. His law is the law of
self and real freedom is in proceeding along the law of self.
Being based on emotion rather than reason, the religion, maybe beyond the ethical one but it is still a state of good filled
with goodness desired by everyone. Hence its path passes through ethics. A man with vices or having bad qualities in him
cannot be religious. Unethical religion is merely a blind faith. An immoral God is as good as the devil.
Thus, ethics is essential for religion. On the contrary religion does not follow ethics, because both are found on dissimilar
grounds. Reasons and emotions should develop simultaneously, not successively. A person is not first religious and then
ethical or vice-versa but he is both ethical and religious at the same time. Only an integral outlook can carry man to
perfection.

7. RELIGION AND MORALITY ARE INTERDEPENDENT

Thus, the view, that Religion is the ideal basis of the Ethics. Moral is the expression in society, of our spiritual
consciousness.
A person, who sees God in every object unconsciously, turns to social service. A truly religious person sees the entire
world permeated with goodness. Religion and ethics both make important contributions to the development of the human
personality, though their sources are different.
Religion is concerned with the relations between God and the individual. Ethics depends upon volitions and religion upon
psychic emotions. In human development, both ethics and religion develop side by side and influence each other. It is
Page | 16
Paper Publications
 ISSN 2349-7831

International Journal of Recent Research in Social Sciences and Humanities (IJRRSSH)

Vol. 2, Issue 2, pp: (14-18), Month: April 2015 - June 2015, Available at: www.paperpublications.org

possible that in some circumstances religion may be unreasoanable or illogical, in such a case it would be inappropriate to
call it as a true religion. A true religion is faith in the realisation that there exist God and the state of God’s existence
cannot be unethical. Religious fulfilment satisfies our whole personality. Thus, it must be ethical, because without being
ethical it cannot satisfy our volition aspect.
Emotion without action is only one sided and lifeless and thus not true . Religion is incomplete without ethics. Thus ethics
acts upon religion and makes it pure and refind. Religion reacts upon ethics and motivates it. Neither ethics can replace
religion nor can religion substitute ethics. Both religion and ethics are indispensable for the complete and integral
development of the relations between the individual, society and God.

8. RESOURCES
 The Christian Research Institute: Atheists and the Quest for Objective Morality.

REFERENCES
[1] Magda Healey , Encyclopaedia Britannica:Ethics
[2] Magda Healey , Encyclopaedia Britannica: Religion
[3] Magda Healey , BBC: Ethics Guide
[4] Magda Healey , The Progressive: The Dalai Lama Interview
[5] Bormann, J. E., Gifford, A. L., Shively, M., Smith, T. L., Redwine, L., Kelly, A., Becker, S., Gershwin, M., Bone,
P., and Belding, W. (2006). Effects of spiritual mantram repetition on HIV outcomes: A randomized controlled
trial. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 29, 359-376.
[6] Hackney, C. H., & Sanders, G. S. (2003). Religiosity and mental health: A meta-analysis of recent studies. Journal
for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42, 43-55.
[7] Hill, T. D., Ellison, C. G., Burdette, A. M., & Musick, M. A. (2007). Religious involvement in a healthy lifestyles:
Evidence from the survey of Texas adults. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 34, 217-222.
[8] Kendler, K. S., Gardner, C. O., & Prescott, C. A. (1996). Religion, psychopathology, and substance use and abuse:
A multi-measure, genetic-epidemiologic study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 322-329.
[9] Koenig, H. G., McCullough, M. E., & Larson, D. B. (2001). Handbook of religion and health. New York: Oxford.
[10] Leigh, J., Bowen, S., & Marlatt, G. A. (2005). Spirituality, mindfulness, and substance abuse. Addictive behavior,
30, 1335-1341.
[11] Marks, L. (2005). Religion and bio-psycho-social health: A review of and conceptual model. Journal of Religion
and Health, 44, 173-186.
[12] Marsden, P., Karagianni, E., & Morgan, J.F. (2007). Spirituality and clinical care in eating disorders: A qualitative
study. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 40, 7-12.
[13] Masters, K.S., Spielmans, G. I., & Goodson, J. T. (2006). Are there demonstrable effects of distant intercessory
prayer? A meta-analytic review. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 32, 337-342.
[14] McClain, C., Rosenfeld, B., & Breitbart, W. (2003). Effect of spiritual well-being on end-of-life despair in
terminally ill cancer patients. The Lancet, 361, 1603-1607.
[15] McCullough, M. E., Hoyt, W. T., Larson, D. B., Koenig, H. G., & Thoresen, C. E. (2000). Religious
involvement and mortality: A meta-analytic review. Health Psychology 19, 211-221.
[16] Michalak, L., Trocki, K., & Bond, J. (2007). Religion and alcohol in the U.S. national Alcohol Survey: How
important is religion for abstention and drinking? Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 87, 268-280.

Page | 17
Paper Publications
 ISSN 2349-7831

International Journal of Recent Research in Social Sciences and Humanities (IJRRSSH)

Vol. 2, Issue 2, pp: (14-18), Month: April 2015 - June 2015, Available at: www.paperpublications.org

[17] Miller, L., Warner, V., Wickramaratne, P., & Weissman, M. (1997). Religiosity anddepression: Ten-year
follow-up of depressed mothers and offspring. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent
Psychiatry, 36, 1416-1425.
[18] Oman, D., Shapiro, S. L., Thoresen, C. E., Plante, T. G., & Flinders, T. (2008). Meditation lowers stress and
supports forgiveness among college students: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of American College Health,
56, 569-578.
[19] Pardini, D., Plante, T. G., Sherman, A., & Stump, J. E. (2000). Religious faith and spirituality in substance
abuse recovery: Determining the mental health benefits. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 19, 347-354.
[20] Plante, T. G., & Sherman, A. S. (Eds.) (2001). Faith and health: Psychological perspectives. New York:
Guilford.
[21] Plante, T. G., & Thoresen, C. E. (Eds.) (2007). Spirit, science and health: How the spiritual mind fuels physical
wellness. Westport, CT: Praeger/Greenwood.
[22] Powell, L., Shahabi, L. & Thoresen, C. E. (2003). Religion and spirituality: Linkages to
physical health. American Psychologist, 58, 36-52.
[23] Seeman, T. E., Dubin, L. F., & Seeman, M. (2003). Religiosity/spirituality and health: A critical review of the
evidence for biological pathways. American Psychologist, 58, 53-63.
[24] Shreve-Neiger, A. K., & Edelstein, B. A. (2004). Religion and anxiety: A critical review of the literature. Clinical
Psychology Review, 24, 379-397.
[25] Siegrist, M. (1996). Church attendance, denomination, and suicide ideology. Journal of Social Psychology, 136,
559-566.
[26] Stewart, C. (2001). The influence of spirituality on substance abuse of college students. Journal of Drug Education,
31, 343-51.
[27] Worthington, E. L., Kurusu, T. A., McCullough, M. E., & Sandage, S. J. (1996). Empirical research on religion
and psychotherapeutic processes and outcomes: A ten-year review and research prospectus. Psychological Bulletin,
119, 448-487.

Page | 18
Paper Publications