Isolation of Fungal Edited
Isolation of Fungal Edited
Isolation of Fungal Edited
Fruits spoilage causes threat to human health and responsible for great economic
loss worldwide. This study was conducted to isolate and identify fungi responsible
for spoilage of fruit commonly sold in University of Maiduguri commercial Area.
A total of 9 spoiled fruits, 3 samples from each different fruit Orange (Citrus
sinensis), papaya (Carica papaya), and melon (Cucumismelo), were collected
aseptically in sterile polyethene bag and delivered to Biological Science Research
Laboratory. Fungi were isolated and identifiedby using culturing and microscopic
methods. Seventy seven fungal isolates belonging to five different genera,
Aspergillus spp., Penicillium spp., Alternaria spp., Rhizopus spp., and Yeastwere
isolated from spoiled fruits. Aspergillus spp. had the highest occurrence in all the
fruits tested with a frequency of 40.26% followed by Penicillium spp. (24.67%),
Alternaria spp. (20.78%), Rhizopus spp. (9.1%), and Yeast (5.19%). The results of
this study suggest that fruits are spoiled with variety of fungi which causes great
economic loss of country. In addition, isolation of pathogenic fungi in this study
highlights the risk to human and animal health associated with spoiled fruits.
Therefore improved preservation methods are required to prolong the shelf life of
fruits and minimize the health hazard. * Corresponding Author: Dr. Sham Lal
[email protected]
Article published on January 15, 2020 , Sapna2, Pardeep Kumar1, Javed Ahmed
Ujjan2 , 244 Qureshi et al.Int. J. Biosci.
2020
Introduction
Due to containing high amount of sugar, low pH, andideal water activity fruits are
prone to bacterial andfungal spoilage (Droby, 2006; Singh and Sharma,2007). On
fruits, fungi overgrow bacteria, since theyprefer to grow at low pH. Some fungi
can startspoilage of fruits from the fields, while others canonly contaminate and
proliferate after harvestingwhen the plant natural defense system is
reduced(Tournas and Katsoudas, 2005). It has been reportedpreviously that about
20% of the harvested fruits isspoiled even in developed countries (Droby,
2006;Zhu, 2006). In developing countries, a post-harvest loss of fruit is more
severe due to less storagefacilities.
Fungi are known to destroy fruits, thereby reducing the quantity for consumption
and the profits obtained from sales of fruits. There is need to identify this fungi
especially those that are pathogenic to humans so as to reduce the risk of
contamination and infection arising from handling and consumption of fruits.
Fungi have been identified with the major cause of spoilage in fruits due to their
high water content, proper isolation in Fruit will greatly reduce the spoilage of
those perishable fruit and as such producers and consumers will be able to protect
their Fruit and also identify spoiled Fruit that have been attacked by fungi.
There is little or no work has been done on the isolation and identification of fungi
on spoiled Fruits in the University of Maiduguri Commercial Area.Therefore, the
major Fungi responsible for spoiled of fruit will be majorly identified and checked.
This research work is aimed to Isolate the various fungi associated with the
spoilage of fruits in University of Maiduguri Commercial Areaand to determine the
effects of the isolated fungi on the spoiled fruits.
Objectives
3.1.1 Equipment
Petri dishes, Inoculate needle, burner, conical flasks, beakers, test tubes, filter
papers, culture plate with suitable nutrition media, retort stand, centrifuge,
incubator, microscope.
3.1.2 Reagent
The wet mount technique by using lactophenol cotton blue will be performed as
suggested by Oyeleke and Manga, (2008). Concisely, lactophenol cotton blue (one
drop) will be placed on the clean glass slide, where a small portion of mycelia of
fungal culture will be placed with the help of mycological needle. A cover-slip will
be placed over the specimen by applying a little pressure.
The slide will be observed on 10x and 40x objective lenses of microscope for mold
side identifications in accordance with Samson and Varga, (2007), Adebayo-Tayo
et al., (2012), Tafinta et al., (2013) and Samuel et al.,(2015).
No
Fungi
No. of isolates
(2017).
Statistical analysis
percentage.
Occurrence (%)
Fruit sample
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Aspergillus spp.
Penicillium spp.
Alternaria spp.
Rhizopus spp.
31 it
19
16
Yeast
07
04
40.26
24.67
20.78
9.1
5.19
+
+
+
+
Strawberry
Orange
Papaya
Melon
Apple
GuavaInt. J. Biosci.
2020
2020
Conclusion
isrecommendedto prevent
andimproveshelf life of fruits.
fungal spoilage
Acknowledgements
Conflict of interest
interest.”
References
http://www.sciencepub.net/nature
Biotechnology 2(4).
http://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijeab/2.4.10
81.
https://doi.org/10.4489/MYCO.2009.37.2.077
2(4), 178-81.
http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR
Foods 3, 251-63.
http://dx.doi.org/10.21448/ijsm.398367
in
Bukar A, Mukhtar MD, Adamu S. 2009.
2020
2(1), 43-50.
45-51.
http://dx.doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2006.709.5
http://dx.doi.org/10.20431/2455-4316.0402001
4(2), 146-9.
501-512.
http://www.ijomas.com/vol-3-5/S.Mbajiuka,etalpdf.\
http://dx.doi.org/10.13189/bb.2015.030303
http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/njbas.v21i3.4
Professional 2.
Biodiversity Centre.
Tournas VH, Stack ME. 2001. Production of alternariol and alternariol methyl
ether by Alternariaalternata grown on fruits at various temperatures. Journal of
Food Protection 64(4), 528-32. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-64.4.52.8
Tournas VH, Katsoudas E. 2005. Mould and yeast flora in fresh berries, grapes and
citrus fruits.International Journal of Food Microbiology 105(1), 11-7.