The Incidence of AGN in Galaxies With Different Stellar Population Ages
The Incidence of AGN in Galaxies With Different Stellar Population Ages
The Incidence of AGN in Galaxies With Different Stellar Population Ages
ABSTRACT
It has been argued that recycled gas from stellar mass loss in galaxies might serve as an important fuelling source for black holes
(BHs) in their centers. Utilizing spectroscopic samples of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) at 𝑧 = 0–0.35 and
the Large Early Galaxy Astrophysics Census (LEGA-C) survey at 𝑧 = 0.6–1 that have X-ray coverage from XMM-Newton or
Chandra, we test this stellar mass loss fuelling scenario by investigating how AGN activity and BH growth vary with the break
strength at 4000 Å, Dn 4000 (which is closely related to the age of stellar populations), as younger galaxies are considered to
have higher stellar mass loss rates. We found that when controlling for host-galaxy properties, the fraction of log 𝐿 X /𝑀★ > 32
(which roughly corresponds to Eddington ratios ≳ 1%) AGN and sample-averaged black hole accretion rate (BHAR) decrease
with Dn 4000 among Dn 4000 ≲ 1.9 galaxies, suggesting a higher level of AGN activity among younger galaxies, which supports
the stellar mass loss fuelling scenario. For the oldest and most massive galaxies at 𝑧 = 0–0.35, this decreasing trend is not present
anymore. We found that, among these most massive galaxies at low redshift, the fraction of low specific-accretion-rate (31 <
log 𝐿 X /𝑀★ < 32) AGNs increases with Dn 4000, which may be associated with additional fuelling from hot halo gas and/or
enhanced accretion capability.
Key words: galaxies: active – galaxies: evolution – galaxies: nuclei – X-rays: galaxies
1 http://www.mpa-garching.mpg.de/SDSS/DR7/
2 Galaxies in the SDSS Legacy Survey are observed with 3′′ -diameter fibers. 3 Galaxies in the LEGA-C survey are observed with 1′′ × 8′′ slits.
Table 1. Summary of sample properties. (1) Name of the sample. (2) Redshift Dn 4000 measurements is small for AGNs in our sample, and will not
range of the sample. (3) 𝑀★ range of the sample. (4) Number of galaxies in materially affect our results.
the sample. (5) Number of log 𝐿X /𝑀★ > 32 AGNs.
4XMM 0–0.35 log𝑀★ > 9 22576 89 2.4 Obtaining AGN fraction and sample-averaged black-hole
COSMOS 0.6–1.0 log𝑀★ > 10 1496 38 accretion rate
The AGN fraction is defined in terms of 𝐿 X /𝑀★ (as advocated by
Bongiorno et al. 2016; Aird et al. 2018, 2019, 2022; Birchall et al.
sources within both the COSMOS and UltraVISTA regions utiliz- 2022), which measures the rate of black hole growth relative to the
ing photometric data in 38 bands (including 24 broad bands) from stellar mass of the host galaxy (i.e. the “specific black hole accretion
NUV to FIR (Laigle et al. 2016) and the SED-fitting code CIGALE rate”) and thus accounts for the overall stellar-mass-selection bias
(e.g. Boquien et al. 2019; Yang et al. 2020). X-ray counterparts from whereby weakly accreting AGN in more massive galaxies have a
Chandra are also matched for this photometric sample of galaxies in higher 𝐿 X and are thus easier to detect (see Aird et al. 2012). AGN
Ni et al. (2021b). The detailed process to obtain 𝑀★ and SFR mea- fractions throughout this work, unless otherwise stated, refer to ob-
surements can be seen in section 2.1 of Ni et al. (2021b). An AGN jects with log 𝐿 X /𝑀★ ⩾ 32, which roughly corresponds to Eddington
component is included in the SED fitting, in addition to the galaxy ratios of ≳ 1% following the conversion factors from Equation 2 of
component. As discussed in Ni et al. (2021b), adding the X-ray infor- Aird et al. (2018). For the 4XMM sample, we adopt the X-ray fluxes
mation or not during the SED fitting does not significantly affect the of detected XMM-Newton sources from the 4XMM DR11 catalog
Bayesian 𝑀★ and SFR measurements. Uncertainties of the 𝑀★ and (Webb et al. 2020). We convert the X-ray fluxes to 𝐿 X assuming a
SFR values obtained are also discussed in section 2.1 and appendix power-law model with Galactic absorption and Γ = 1.7 following
A of Ni et al. (2021b). We note that 𝑀★ measurements are generally the preference order of 4.5–12 keV band, and 0.2–12 keV band, thus
robust when comparing results from different SED fitting methods, minimizing the effects of X-ray obscuration. About 90% of the X-ray
with a scatter of ≈ 0.1 dex; the scatter of SFR measurements can be sources in our 4XMM sample have 4.5–12 keV band flux measure-
up to ≈ 0.4 dex. This finally provides a sample of 1792 galaxies in ments available. For the COSMOS sample, we adopt 𝐿 X calculated
the COSMOS field. from Ni et al. (2021b), which is converted from X-ray fluxes fol-
lowing the 2–7 keV, 0.5–7 keV, and 0.5–2 keV order, also assuming
the Γ = 1.7 power-law model. For X-ray sources in the COSMOS
sample, ≈ 70% of them have 2–7 keV band flux measurements avail-
2.3 Sample properties
able, and 0.5–7 keV/0.5–2 keV band flux measurements are used
In Figure 1, we present the 𝑀★ vs. 𝑧 distributions for the selected for ≈ 27%/3% of them. In the left panels of Figure 4, we present
SDSS galaxies and LEGA-C galaxies. For SDSS galaxies with the 𝐿 X /𝑀★ distribution of X-ray detected sources which have 𝐿 X
XMM-Newton coverage, we plot the 90% 𝑀★ completeness curve of values greater than the contributions from X-ray binaries (XRBs) in
galaxies in the SDSS main galaxy sample. The limiting 𝑀★ is derived our samples. The XRB luminosity (𝐿 X,XRB ) is estimated through
following section 3.2 of Ilbert et al. (2013) given the 𝑟-band Petrosian a redshift-dependent function of 𝑀★ and SFR (model 269, Fragos
magnitude limit of 17.77 of the SDSS main galaxy sample (Strauss et al. 2013), which is derived utilizing observations in Lehmer et al.
et al. 2002). In our study, we only utilize SDSS galaxies above this (2016).
mass-completeness curve, and we refer to this galaxy sample as the When deriving the AGN fraction, we correct 𝐿 X to account for
4XMM sample throughout the remainder of this work. The LEGA-C the modest systematic effect from obscuration with correction factors
primary targets are drawn from a 𝐾 𝑠 -band selected parent sample; detailed below. Utilizing X-ray sources in Chandra Deep Field-South
these targets are representative of the parent sample when taking into (Luo et al. 2017) that have similar X-ray flux level as Chandra COS-
account the selection correction factor SCOR provided in the LEGA-C MOS sources but with more counts, Yang et al. (2018) compared the
catalog (see Appendix A of van der Wel et al. 2021 for details). This intrinsic 𝐿 X from spectral modeling with 𝐿 X calculated following
selection correction factor is utilized in our analyses to weight each the scheme mentioned above, and found that the overall underesti-
galaxy, although we find that excluding this factor does not impact mation of X-ray emission due to obscuration is ≈ 20%. We apply
our results materially (see Section 3.1 for details). The 90% 𝑀★ com- this correction factor throughout this work for all the 𝐿 X values of
pleteness curve for the parent sample (which has a redshift-dependent X-ray detected sources in the COSMOS sample when calculating
𝐾 𝑠 -band limiting magnitude of 20.7−7.5×log((1+𝑧)/1.8)) is shown the AGN fraction. The obscuration correction factor is obtained in a
on the plot. In our study, we only utilize LEGA-C galaxies above this similar manner for the 4XMM sample, utilizing the XMMFITCAT-Z
mass-completeness curve of the parent sample, and we refer to this spectral fit catalag (Ruiz et al. 2021) that provides intrinsic 𝐿 X mea-
galaxy sample as the COSMOS sample throughout the remainder of surements for 3XMM-DR6 sources. We match X-ray sources in our
this work. We carry out our studies with mass-complete samples to sample with sources in the XMMFITCAT-Z catalog that have spec-𝑧
avoid any potential bias associated with an incomplete characteriza- available. With this matched sample, we derive the obscuration cor-
tion of galaxy populations. In Table 1, we present the properties of rection factor needed by obtaining the average value of the intrinsic
the 4XMM sample and the COSMOS sample. In Figures 2 and 3, 𝐿 X reported divided by 𝐿 X calculated in this work; 𝐿 X -dependent
we present how galaxies/AGNs in our samples distribute on the SFR weights are applied to the matched sample to recover the 𝐿 X distribu-
vs. 𝑀★ plane, SFR vs. Dn 4000 plane, and Dn 4000 vs. 𝑀★ plane; tion of the X-ray AGNs in the whole 4XMM sample. We found that
we also present the Dn 4000 distribution of galaxies/AGNs. In Ap- the overall underestimation of X-ray emission due to obscuration is
pendix A, we show that the contamination from AGN emission to ≈ 10%. We apply this correction factor throughout this work for all
Figure 1. 𝑀★ as a function of 𝑧 for SDSS main sample galaxies in the MPA-JHU catalog with XMM-Newton coverage (blue dots) and galaxies included the
LEGA-C survey (green dots). X-ray AGNs with log 𝐿X /𝑀★ > 32 are marked as orange stars. The dashed curve indicates the 90% 𝑀★ completeness limit as a
function of redshift.
the 𝐿 X values of X-ray detected sources in the 4XMM sample when sample with replacement) 1000 times. For each bootstrapped sample,
calculating the AGN fraction.4 the AGN fraction is calculated, and the 16th and 84th percentiles of
When deriving the AGN fraction, we have also taken into account the obtained AGN fraction distribution give the estimation of the 1𝜎
the varying sensitivity of X-ray observations that provide X-ray cov- uncertainty. When no AGN is detected in a sample, we report the 1𝜎
erage to our samples. For the 4XMM sample, we derive the sensitivity confidence upper limits derived following Cameron (2011).
upper limit of the relevant RapidXMM HealPix from the background We also estimate the long-term average BH growth from BHAR of
level reported at the position of each MPA-JHU galaxy. Following a given sample of galaxies sharing similar properties, following the
Equations 3 and 4 of Chen et al. (2018), we derive the minimum num- method described in Ni et al. (2019, 2021b) that includes contribu-
ber of counts required for a source to be detected in the 0.2–12 keV tions from both X-ray detected sources and X-ray undetected sources.
band given the background level, and derive the corresponding flux We apply the obscuration correction factor mentioned earlier (1.1 for
sensitivity with the corresponding energy conversion factor (ECF) the 4XMM sample and 1.2 for the COSMOS sample) when taking
which are derived assuming a power-law spectrum with Γ = 1.7.5 into account the X-ray emission from X-ray detected sources.6 The
Since the 4XMM catalog uses DET_ML = 6 in the 0.2–12 keV band X-ray emission of a group of X-ray undetected sources is taken into
as the source detection criterion, we set the probability of the detected account via X-ray stacking techniques in the 0.2–12 keV band for the
source being a random Poisson fluctuation due to the background as 4XMM sample and the 0.5–7 keV band for the COSMOS sample.
2.5 × 10 −3 when utilizing the equations. For the COSMOS sample, With the source counts rate and background counts rate reported in
we derive the sensitivity map following the method in Aird et al. RapidXMM, the net 0.2–12 keV count rate at each galaxy position
(2017). in the 4XMM sample can be obtained, which is then converted to
Combining with the redshift information, the lower limit of the 𝐿 X the 0.2–12 keV flux with the corresponding energy conversion factor
of a source in order to be detected, 𝐿 X,limit , can be obtained for every derived assuming a power-law spectrum with Γ = 1.7. For the COS-
galaxy in both the 4XMM sample and the COSMOS sample. We MOS sample, the stacking process is described in Ni et al. (2021b),
note that a power-law model with Galactic absorption and Γ = 1.7 is which gives the 0.5–7 keV net count rate/flux at each galaxy position.
assumed through the whole conversion process. In the right panels We derive the average X-ray luminosity 𝐿 X,stack from the average
of Figure 4, we present the 𝐿 X,limit /𝑀★ distribution of galaxies in flux and the average redshift of the stacked sample.
the 4XMM and COSMOS samples. We only derive AGN fraction With 𝐿 X for individual X-ray detected sources and 𝐿 X,stack for X-
utilizing galaxies with log 𝐿 X,limit /𝑀★ ⩽ 32, i.e. these where we ray undetected sources, we can obtain sample-averaged AGN bolo-
have the sensitivities to detect an AGN with log 𝐿 X /𝑀★ > 32, if it metric luminosity following Equation 3 of Ni et al. (2021b) assuming
exists in the given galaxy: the 𝐿 X -dependent bolometric correction from Hopkins et al. (2007):
𝑁det,log 𝐿X /𝑀⋆ >32
𝑓AGN,log 𝐿X /𝑀⋆ >32 = . (1) 𝑁
𝑁galaxy,log 𝐿X,limit /𝑀⋆ ⩽32 Ídet
(𝐿 X − 𝐿 X,XRB )𝑘 bol + (𝐿 X,stack − 𝐿 X,XRB )𝑁non 𝑘 bol
The uncertainty of the AGN fraction is obtained via bootstrapping the 𝑛=0
𝐿 bol =
sample (i.e. randomly drawing the same number of objects from the 𝑁det + 𝑁non
(2)
4 We note that the change in AGN fraction associated with applying the We also subtract the contributions from X-ray binaries (XRBs) from
obscuration correction factor is generally much smaller than the statistical
uncertainty of AGN fraction. Thus, X-ray absorption should not bias our
results materially. 6 We note that the change in BHAR associated with applying the obscuration
5 https://www.cosmos.esa.int/web/xmm-newton/ correction factor is generally smaller than the statistical uncertainty of BHAR.
epic-upper-limits Thus, X-ray absorption should not bias our results materially.
4XMM sample
2 2
log SFR
log SFR
0 0
2 2
9 10 11 12 1.0 1.5 2.0
log M Dn4000
2.0 2
Density
Dn4000
1.5
1
1.0
9 10 11 12 0 1.0 1.5 2.0
log M Dn4000
Figure 2. Galaxies in the 4XMM sample in the SFR vs. 𝑀★ plane (upper-left), SFR vs. Dn 4000 plane (upper-right), and Dn 4000 vs. 𝑀★ plane (bottom-left).
The contours encircle 68 per cent, 80 per cent, 90 per cent, and 95 per cent of galaxies. Log 𝐿X /𝑀★ > 32 AGNs are represented by the orange stars. In the
bottom-right panel, the Dn 4000 distribution of galaxies is represented by the blue histogram; the Dn 4000 distribution of log 𝐿X /𝑀★ > 32 AGNs is represented
by the orange histogram.
𝐿 X and 𝐿 X,stack before applying the bolometric correction. The con- Dn 4000 (see Figure 5c), which shows an overall similar trend as
tributions from XRBs are generally small compared to the overall BHAR.
X-ray luminosity. Then, sample-averaged AGN bolometric luminos- Similarly, we bin objects in the COSMOS sample into 4 bins
ity can be converted to BHAR adopting a constant radiative efficiency according to their Dn 4000 values, with equal number of objects per
of 0.1 following Equation 4 in Ni et al. (2021b). The uncertainty of bin. For the COSMOS sample, when we calculate AGN fraction
BHAR is obtained via bootstrapping the sample 1000 times. For each as well as BHAR for a given subsample in this study, we weight
bootstrapped sample, BHAR is calculated, and the 16th and 84th per- the contribution from each object by the SCOR parameter in the
centiles of the obtained BHAR distribution give the estimation of the LEGA-C catalog, which accounts for the selection effects from the
1𝜎 uncertainty associated with BHAR of the sample. parent sample; we also verified that the analysis results do not vary
materially when we do not weight each object by SCOR. Figure 5d
shows that, at the Dn 4000 range we probe (Dn 4000 ≈ 1.25–1.9),
3 ANALYSIS RESULTS AGN fraction decreases with Dn 4000 in general. In terms of BHAR
as well as BHAR/𝑀★ (see Figure 5e and Figure 5f), similarly, a
3.1 AGN fraction and BHAR as a function of Dn 4000 decreasing trend in general is observed with increasing Dn 4000. We
For objects in the 4XMM sample, we bin them into 6 bins with equal note that, at Dn 4000 ≲ 1.5, this decreasing trend of AGN fraction,
number of objects per bin according to their Dn 4000 values. Figure 5a BHAR, and BHAR/𝑀★ is not very significant – the large error bars
shows that the AGN fraction presents a clear decreasing trend with as a result of the limited sample size prohibits us from drawing any
Dn 4000 at Dn 4000 ≲ 1.85, and slightly increases at Dn 4000 ≳ significant conclusion.
1.85. We note that this result will not be materially affected by We further investigate AGN fraction and BHAR in different 𝑀★
the 𝐿 X /𝑀★ threshold we adopt (see Appendix B for details). We ranges for both the 4XMM sample and the COSMOS sample; the
further plot BHAR as a function of Dn 4000 for the 4XMM sample results can be seen in Figure 6. We can see that for different 𝑀★
(see Figure 5b). We can see that BHAR also decreases as Dn 4000 ranges in the 4XMM sample, AGN fraction, BHAR, and BHAR/𝑀★
increases from ∼ 1.25 to ∼ 1.85. At Dn 4000 ≳ 1.85, the trend also decrease with Dn 4000 at Dn 4000 ≲ 1.9. The increasing trend
appears to reverse, and BHAR significantly increases with increasing of BHAR at larger Dn 4000 is more prominent among objects with
Dn 4000. To account for differences in the average 𝑀★ for galaxies 11 < log 𝑀★ ⩽ 12. For different 𝑀★ ranges in the COSMOS sample,
across our Dn 4000 bins, we also plot BHAR/𝑀★ as a function of we also observe decreasing trends of AGN fraction, BHAR, and
COSMOS sample
log SFR 2 2
log SFR
0 0
2 2
10.0 10.5 11.0 11.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
log M Dn4000
2.0 3
Density
Dn4000
1.5 2
1
1.0
10.0 10.5 11.0 11.5 0 1.0 1.5 2.0
log M Dn4000
Figure 3. Galaxies in the COSMOS sample in the SFR vs. 𝑀★ plane (upper-left), SFR vs. Dn 4000 plane (upper-right), and Dn 4000 vs. 𝑀★ plane (bottom-left).
The contours encircle 68 per cent, 80 per cent, 90 per cent, and 95 per cent of galaxies. Log 𝐿X /𝑀★ > 32 AGNs are represented by the orange stars. In the
bottom-right panel, the Dn 4000 distribution of galaxies is represented by the green histogram; the Dn 4000 distribution of log 𝐿X /𝑀★ > 32 AGNs is represented
by the orange histogram.
BHAR/𝑀★ with Dn 4000, though we note that for Dn 4000 ≲ 1.5 right. We then select the nearest neighbour of objects in the reference
objects with 10 < log 𝑀★ ⩽ 11, the decreasing trend is not very bin among objects in its left/right bin in the 𝑀★, SFR, and 𝑧 space
significant, which might be caused by the limited sample size. utilizing the NearestNeighbors algorithm in the scikit-learn
python package, to constitute two comparison samples with similar
𝑀★, SFR, and 𝑧 properties, but one with smaller Dn 4000 and one
3.2 AGN fraction and BHAR as a function of Dn 4000 when with larger Dn 4000. In Figure 7, we show AGN fractions of all these
controlling for other host-galaxy parameters subsamples, with each set of subsamples sharing similar 𝑀★, SFR,
and 𝑧 values represented by different colors and symbols. Compar-
We note that, while in Section 3.1 we characterized the incidence of
ing within each subsample set reveals how AGN fraction varies with
X-ray AGNs among galaxies with different stellar ages (as Dn 4000
Dn 4000 when controlling for other host-galaxy parameters, and a
is closely associated with the age of the stellar populations), we can
significant decreasing trend is observed within each subsample set
still not quantify how the difference in Dn 4000 (which indicates the
at Dn 4000 ≲ 1.9.8 We also demonstrate that our results hold when
difference in the mean stellar population age) directly affects AGN
defining the AGN fraction by an 𝐿 X limit of 1042 erg s −1 in the Ap-
activity and BH growth, as host-galaxy properties such as 𝑀★ and
pendix C. We show BHAR and BHAR/𝑀★ of all these subsamples
SFR vary across different Dn 4000 bins, which are known to closely
as well in Figure 7, with each set of subsamples sharing similar 𝑀★,
related with AGN activity and BH growth.
SFR, and 𝑧 values represented by different colors and symbols. Com-
We thus would like to study AGN fraction and BHAR as a func-
paring within each subsample set shows that BHAR and BHAR/𝑀★
tion of Dn 4000 when controlling for other host-galaxy parameters.
also decrease with Dn 4000 at Dn 4000 ≲ 1.9 when controlling for
To achieve this, for each bin (except the first and last bins) of galaxies
in the 4XMM sample in Figure 5, we sort this subsample with their
Dn 4000 values, and keep the central 1/3 of the objects to form a
reference bin.7 The first 1/3 of the objects are merged with the bin on are necessary to ensure sufficient sources with similar 𝑀★ , SFR and 𝑧 values
the left, and the last 1/3 of the objects are merged with the bin on the in the adjacent bins that are used to create the comparison samples.
8 We note that while AGN fraction varies with D 4000, it also varies when
n
other host-galaxy properties change, so that at a fixed Dn 4000, the AGN
7 While choosing this relatively small subsample size reduces the statistical fraction from different subsamples differs due to the differences in 𝑀★ and
power compared to the larger bin size used in Section 3.1, these narrower bins SFR.
Number of sources
Number of sources
200 15000
150
10000
100
5000
50
0 029 30 31 32 33 34
30 32 34
log(LX/M ) log(LX, limit/M )
COSMOS AGN COSMOS AGN/galaxies
1200
20 1000
Number of sources
Number of sources
15 800
10 600
400
5 200
0 30 029 30 31 32 33 34
31 32 33 34
log(LX/M ) log(LX, limit/M )
Figure 4. Left panels: The observed distribution of log 𝐿X /𝑀★ for X-ray detected sources in the 4XMM (top left) and COSMOS (bottom left) samples. Right
panels: The cumulative distribution of the detection limit, log 𝐿X,limit /𝑀★ above which an AGN could be detected for all galaxies in the 4XMM (top right)
and COSMOS (bottom right) samples. The vertical lines represent the 𝐿X /𝑀★ limit adopted in our work when calculating AGN fraction. While a significant
number of AGNs detected have log 𝐿X /𝑀★ < 32, we note that a large fraction of galaxies in both samples have log 𝐿X,limit /𝑀★ ⩽ 32 to enable an unbiased
characterization of AGN fraction.
𝑀★, SFR, and 𝑧.9 At Dn 4000 ≳ 1.9, BHAR and BHAR/𝑀★ increase at Dn 4000 ≳ 1.85, the AGN fraction does not increase significantly,
with Dn 4000 when controlling for 𝑀★, SFR, and 𝑧. which might be caused by our definition for AGNs, as we only look at
Similarly, we study how AGN fraction and BH growth vary with log 𝐿 X /𝑀★ > 32 AGNs in Section 3.1 and do not take low-accretion-
Dn 4000 within subsample sets when controlling for other host-galaxy rate AGNs into account when calculating the AGN fraction. This
parameters for the COSMOS sample. The results are shown in Fig- inspired us to examine the incidence of low-accretion-rate AGN as a
ure 8. We also observe a trend of decreasing AGN fraction, BHAR function of Dn 4000. As stated in Section 2.4, we only consider an X-
and BHAR/𝑀★ with Dn 4000, similar to that seen at lower redshifts ray detected source as AGN when 𝐿 X is greater than the contribution
in our 4XMM sample, although at Dn 4000 ≲ 1.5 this trend has a from XRBs. As can be seen in Figure 4, we have a considerable num-
relatively low significance level. ber of AGNs with log 𝐿 X /𝑀★ ⩽ 32 detected in the 4XMM sample,
We also show that host morphological properties do not affect the and there are also a large number of galaxies in the 4XMM sample
results in this subsection materially in Appendix D. with log 𝐿 X,limit /𝑀★ ⩽ 32. We thus use these objects to study how
the fraction of AGNs with 31 < log 𝐿 X /𝑀★ < 32 varies as a function
of Dn 4000, and the result is shown in Figure 9. We can see that the
3.3 The incidence of low-accretion-rate AGN as a function of fraction increases at Dn 4000 ≳ 1.85 obviously.
Dn 4000 compared with log 𝐿 X /𝑀★ > 32 AGN
In Section 3.1, we find that for objects in the 4XMM sample, We further probe if this increase of low-accretion-rate AGN frac-
while BHAR and BHAR/𝑀★ significantly increase with Dn 4000 tion with Dn 4000 is linked with 𝑀★, by studying the low-accretion-
rate AGN fraction as a function of Dn 4000 in different 𝑀★ bins. As
9 While X-ray emission from normal star-forming galaxies has potential we can see in Figure 10, for galaxies/AGN with log 𝑀★ < 11.5, AGNs
dependence on stellar ages (e.g. Gilbertson et al. 2022), the XRB contribution tend to live among younger galaxies. In contrast, for galaxies/AGNs
is little among the objects we investigated (∼ 5–15%), so should not bias our with log 𝑀★ > 11.5, the fraction of AGNs with 31 < log 𝐿 X /𝑀★ <
results. 32 increases with Dn 4000. When we perform the same analyses for
1.0 logM :
logSFR:
10.5
0.3
10.8
-0.3
10.8 10.9 10.9 11.1
-1.0 -1.2 -1.2 -1.2 1.0 logM :
logSFR:
10.9
1.3
11.0
0.5
11.1
-0.6
11.2
-1.3
1.5 1.5
log BHAR (M /yr)
3.0
4.0
3.5
log BHAR/M (Gyr 1)
4.5 4.0
4.5
5.0 5.0
5.5 5.5
6.0
6.0 6.5
1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
Dn4000 Dn4000
(c) (f)
Figure 5. (a): AGN fraction as a function of Dn 4000 among galaxies in the 4XMM sample. The horizontal position of each data point represents the median
Dn 4000 of the sources in each bin, with 𝑥-axis error bars demonstrating the 16th and 84th percentiles of the Dn 4000 values in each bin. The 𝑦-axis error bars
represent the 1𝜎 confidence interval of AGN fraction from bootstrapping. We also list the median log 𝑀★ and log SFR of each bin on the top of the plot. The
numbers in the bottom of the plot represent the number of galaxies in each bin used to derive the AGN fraction (with log 𝐿X,limit /𝑀★ ⩽ 32). (b): BHAR as
a function of Dn 4000 among galaxies in the 4XMM sample. The horizontal position of each data point represents the median Dn 4000 of the sources in each
bin, with 𝑥-axis error bars demonstrating the 16th and 84th percentiles of the Dn 4000 values in each bin. The 𝑦-axis error bars represent the 1𝜎 confidence
interval of BHAR from bootstrapping. We also list the median log 𝑀★ and log SFR of each bin on the top of the plot. (c): BHAR/𝑀★ a function of Dn 4000
among galaxies in the 4XMM sample. The horizontal position of each data point represents the median Dn 4000 of the sources in each bin, with 𝑥-axis error
bars demonstrating the 16th and 84th percentiles of the Dn 4000 values in each bin. The 𝑦-axis error bars represent the 1𝜎 confidence interval of BHAR/𝑀★
from bootstrapping. (d): Similar to panel (a), but for AGN fraction as a function of Dn 4000 among galaxies in the COSMOS sample. (e): Similar to panel (b),
but for BHAR as a function of Dn 4000 among galaxies in the COSMOS sample. (f): Similar to panel (c), but for BHAR/𝑀★ as a function of Dn 4000 among
galaxies in the COSMOS sample.
MNRAS 000, 1–21 (2015)
AGNs in the lifecycle of galaxies 9
1.0 1.0
1.5 1.5
2.0
log BHAR (M /yr)
3 3
log BHAR/M (Gyr 1)
4 4
5 5
6 6
1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
Dn4000 Dn4000
(c) (f)
Figure 6. (a): AGN fraction as a function of Dn 4000 among galaxies in two 𝑀★ bins (represented by different colors and symbols) in the 4XMM sample.
The horizontal position of each data point represents the median Dn 4000 of the sources in each bin, with 𝑥-axis error bars demonstrating the 16th and 84th
percentiles of the Dn 4000 values in each bin. The 𝑦-axis error bars represent the 1𝜎 confidence interval of AGN fraction from bootstrapping. (b): BHAR as
a function of Dn 4000 among galaxies in the 4XMM sample. The horizontal position of each data point represents the median Dn 4000 of the sources in each
bin, with 𝑥-axis error bars demonstrating the 16th and 84th percentiles of the Dn 4000 values in each bin. The 𝑦-axis error bars represent the 1𝜎 confidence
interval of BHAR from bootstrapping. (c): BHAR/𝑀★ as a function of Dn 4000 among galaxies in the 4XMM sample. The horizontal position of each data
point represents the median Dn 4000 of the sources in each bin, with 𝑥-axis error bars demonstrating the 16th and 84th percentiles of the Dn 4000 values in each
bin. The 𝑦-axis error bars represent the 1𝜎 confidence interval of BHAR/𝑀★ from bootstrapping. (d): Similar to panel (a), but for AGN fraction as a function
of Dn 4000 among galaxies in two 𝑀★ bins in the COSMOS sample. (e): Similar to panel (b), but for BHAR as a function of Dn 4000 among galaxies in two 𝑀★
bins in the COSMOS sample. (f): Similar to panel (c), but for BHAR/𝑀★ as a function of Dn 4000 among galaxies in two 𝑀★ bins in the COSMOS sample.
5.00 3.5
5.25
4.0
5.50
5.75 4.5
6.00 5.0
6.25 5.5
6.50 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8
Dn4000 Dn4000
Figure 7. Top: AGN fraction as a function of Dn 4000 among galaxies in the Figure 8. Top: Similar to the top panel of Figure 7, but for AGN fraction as
4XMM sample when controlling for 𝑀★ , SFR, and 𝑧. Different symbols and a function of Dn 4000 when controlling for 𝑀★ , SFR, and 𝑧 among galaxies
colors represent a set of subsamples with similar 𝑀★ , SFR, and 𝑧 values (as in the COSMOS sample. Middle: Similar to the middle panel of Figure 7,
listed on top of the panel with the same color). The horizontal position of but for BHAR as a function of Dn 4000 when controlling for 𝑀★ , SFR, and 𝑧
each data point represents the median Dn 4000 of the sources in each sample, among galaxies in the COSMOS sample. Bottom: Similar to the middle panel
with 𝑥-axis error bars demonstrating the 16th and 84th percentiles of the of Figure 7, but for BHAR/𝑀★ as a function of Dn 4000 when controlling for
Dn 4000 values. The 𝑦-axis error bars represent the 1𝜎 confidence interval 𝑀★ , SFR, and 𝑧 among galaxies in the COSMOS sample.
of AGN fraction from bootstrapping. Middle: Similar to the top panel, but for
BHAR as a function of Dn 4000 among galaxies in the 4XMM sample when
controlling for 𝑀★ , SFR, and 𝑧. Bottom: Similar to the top panel, but for
BHAR/𝑀★ as a function of Dn 4000 among galaxies in the 4XMM sample
when controlling for 𝑀★ , SFR, and 𝑧.
16
31 < log LX/M < 32 AGN fraction (%)
3.0 2.5
Figure 12. Left panel: Radio AGN fraction as a function of Dn 4000 among SDSS galaxies when controlling for 𝑀★ , SFR, and 𝑧. Different colors represent a
set of subsamples with similar 𝑀★ , SFR, and 𝑧 values (as listed on top of the panel with the same color). The horizontal position of each data point represents
the median Dn 4000 of the sources in each sample, with 𝑥-axis error bars demonstrating the 16th and 84th percentiles of the Dn 4000 values. The 𝑦-axis error
bars represent the 1𝜎 confidence interval of AGN fraction from bootstrapping. Middle panel: Similar to the left panel, but for LERGs. Right panel: Similar to
the left panel, but for HERGs.
4XMM sample, BHAR/𝑀★ does not track stellar mass loss well of the accumulated hot recycled gas is not a process that happens
among log 𝑀★ > 11 galaxies. This might be due to the fact that in a less than 1 Gyr timescale, it could explain the high BHAR/𝑀★
the accretion efficiency from recycled gas is closely related to other among the relatively young massive galaxies in the 4XMM sample.
factors in addition to 𝑀★, or there are other gas sources for the most If this is the case, it is also plausible that recycled gas contributes
massive galaxies at low redshift. It is also plausible that the onset significantly to the fuel of BHs among star-forming galaxies in the
of the cooling of recycled gas takes several Gyrs to happen among COSMOS sample (see the right panel of Figure 14).
these most massive galaxies due to, e.g., AGN feedback (more mas- We note that it is also plausible that metallicity plays a role here,
sive galaxies tend to host more luminous AGNs that drive stronger as the higher the Dn 4000, the higher the metallicity (e.g. Gallazzi
outflows and exhibit more powerful jets), so that BHAR/𝑀★ does et al. 2005), and it has been argued that BH growth might be more
not track instantaneous stellar mass loss rate at the scale of ≲ 100 efficient in the low-metallicity regime (e.g. Toyouchi et al. 2019).
Myrs, but stellar mass loss accumulated in the past several Gyrs. In Disentangling the effects of age and metallicity would need a large
the background of Figure 14, we also plot the average stellar mass and complete high-signal-to-noise spectroscopic sample from future
loss rate of stellar populations with different star formation histories surveys (e.g. DESI Collaboration et al. 2016; de Jong et al. 2019).
over the past 1 Gyr, 2 Gyrs, and 3 Gyrs, represented by the yellow, Since Dn 4000 is primarily utilized as an age-sensitive parameter
orange, and red dots. We can see that if the cooling and accretion (e.g. Kauffmann et al. 2003; Gallazzi et al. 2005; Kauffmann &
Heckman 2009; Wu et al. 2018) and we do not observe similarly
significant trends when utilizing more metallicity-sensitive parame-
calibration with Dn 4000 ≈ 1.9, the BHAR/𝑀★ is below the prediction from ters (e.g. [MgFe]’, [Mg2 Fe]; see Gallazzi et al. 2005 and references
stellar mass loss rate due to AGN feedback from jets. therein), we interpret the link between AGN activity/BH growth with
log M /M (Gyr 1)
0.5 0.5
1.0 1.0
1.5 1.5
2.0 2.0
2.5 2.5
1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
Dn4000 Dn4000
Figure 14. Left panel: Scaled BHAR/𝑀★ as a function of Dn 4000 among galaxies in 4XMM sample in different 𝑀★ ranges (the scaling factor is selected to
align the Dn 4000 bin with the lowest BHAR/𝑀★ value with stellar mass loss rate), plotted against stellar mass loss rate per stellar mass unit per Gyr (grey
dots), as well as the average stellar mass loss rate over the past 1 Gyr (yellow dots), 2 Gyrs (orange dots), and 3 Gyrs (red dots). The horizontal position of each
data point represents the median Dn 4000 of the sources in each bin, with 𝑥-axis error bars demonstrating the 16th and 84th percentiles of the Dn 4000 values in
each bin. The 𝑦-axis error bars represent the 1𝜎 confidence interval of BHAR/𝑀★ from bootstrapping. Right panel: Similar to the left panel, but for scaled
BHAR/𝑀★ as a function of Dn 4000 among galaxies in the COSMOS sample in different 𝑀★ ranges.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Boquien M., Burgarella D., Roehlly Y., Buat V., Ciesla L., Corre D., Inoue
A. K., Salas H., 2019, A&A, 622, A103
We thank the anonymous referee for constructive feedback. We thank Boroson B., Kim D.-W., Fabbiano G., 2011, ApJ, 729, 12
Johan Comparat for the helpful discussion. QN and JA acknowl- Brandt W. N., Alexander D. M., 2015, A&ARv, 23, 1
edge support from a UKRI Future Leaders Fellowship (grant code: Brandt W. N., Yang G., 2021, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2111.01156
MR/T020989/1). KLB acknowledges funding from a Horizon 2020 Brinchmann J., Charlot S., White S. D. M., Tremonti C., Kauffmann G.,
grant (XMM2Athena). For the purpose of open access, the authors Heckman T., Brinkmann J., 2004, MNRAS, 351, 1151
have applied a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence to any Cameron E., 2011, Publ. Astron. Soc. Australia, 28, 128
Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission. Chabrier G., 2003, PASP, 115, 763
Chen C. T. J., et al., 2018, MNRAS, 478, 2132
Ciotti L., Ostriker J. P., 2007, ApJ, 665, 1038
Civano F., et al., 2016, ApJ, 819, 62
DATA AVAILABILITY Conroy C., Gunn J. E., 2010, ApJ, 712, 833
Conroy C., Gunn J. E., White M., 2009, ApJ, 699, 486
The data underlying this article were accessed from the XMM-Newton DESI Collaboration et al., 2016, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:1611.00036
Science Archive, SDSS data releases, Chandra data archive, and ESO Dekel A., Sarkar K. C., Jiang F., Bournaud F., Krumholz M. R., Ceverino D.,
data portal. The derived data generated in this research will be shared Primack J. R., 2019, MNRAS, 488, 4753
upon reasonable request to the corresponding author. Evans I. N., et al., 2010, ApJS, 189, 37
Faber S. M., et al., 2007, ApJ, 665, 265
Fragos T., Lehmer B. D., Naoz S., Zezas A., Basu-Zych A., 2013, ApJ, 776,
L31
REFERENCES
Gallazzi A., Charlot S., Brinchmann J., White S. D. M., Tremonti C. A., 2005,
Adelman-McCarthy J. K., et al. 2011, VizieR Online Data Catalog, p. II/306 MNRAS, 362, 41
Aird J., et al., 2010, MNRAS, 401, 2531 Gaspari M., Brighenti F., Temi P., 2015, A&A, 579, A62
Aird J., et al., 2012, ApJ, 746, 90 Georgantopoulos I., Pouliasis E., Mountrichas G., Van der Wel A., Marchesi
Aird J., Coil A. L., Georgakakis A., 2017, MNRAS, 465, 3390 S., Lanzuisi G., 2023, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2302.00530
Aird J., Coil A. L., Georgakakis A., 2018, MNRAS, 474, 1225 Gilbertson W., et al., 2022, ApJ, 926, 28
Aird J., Coil A. L., Georgakakis A., 2019, MNRAS, 484, 4360 Hopkins P. F., Hernquist L., 2006, ApJS, 166, 1
Aird J., Coil A. L., Kocevski D. D., 2022, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2201.11756 Hopkins P. F., Richards G. T., Hernquist L., 2007, ApJ, 654, 731
Assef R. J., Stern D., Noirot G., Jun H. D., Cutri R. M., Eisenhardt P. R. M., Hopkins P. F., Wellons S., Anglés-Alcázar D., Faucher-Giguère C.-A., Grudić
2018, ApJS, 234, 23 M. Y., 2022, MNRAS, 510, 630
Balogh M. L., Morris S. L., Yee H. K. C., Carlberg R. G., Ellingson E., 1999, Ilbert O., et al., 2013, A&A, 556, A55
ApJ, 527, 54 Kauffmann G., Heckman T. M., 2009, MNRAS, 397, 135
Barro G., et al., 2017, ApJ, 840, 47 Kauffmann G., et al., 2003, MNRAS, 341, 33
Best P. N., Heckman T. M., 2012, MNRAS, 421, 1569 Kocevski D. D., et al., 2017, ApJ, 846, 112
Best P. N., Kauffmann G., Heckman T. M., Brinchmann J., Charlot S., Ivezić Kormendy J., Ho L. C., 2013, ARA&A, 51, 511
Ž., White S. D. M., 2005, MNRAS, 362, 25 Laigle C., et al., 2016, ApJS, 224, 24
Birchall K. L., Watson M. G., Aird J., Starling R. L. C., 2022, MNRAS, 510, Land K., et al., 2008, MNRAS, 388, 1686
4556 Lehmer B. D., et al., 2016, ApJ, 825, 7
Bongiorno A., et al., 2016, A&A, 588, A78 Lintott C. J., et al., 2008, MNRAS, 389, 1179
4XMM sample
Normalized F
COSMOS sample
Normalized F
Dn4000 = 1.2
Dn4000 = 1.3
Normalized F
Dn4000 = 1.4
Dn4000 = 1.5
Dn4000 = 1.7
Dn4000 = 1.8
Normalized F
Dn4000 = 1.9
Dn4000 = 2.0
Dn4000 = 1.3
Dn4000 = 1.4
Dn4000 = 1.5
Normalized F
Dn4000 = 1.6
Dn4000 = 1.7
3800 3900 4000 4100 4200 4300 4400 4500 4600 4700
rest (Å)
Figure A5. Similar to Figure A3, but for galaxies or AGNs in the COSMOS sample. The synthetic spectra represented by black lines show excess emission
around the broad H𝛾 wings (indicated by the grey regions) compared to galaxy composite spectra. All the spectra presented are normalized at 4285 Å.
0.15
0.10
Dn4000
0.05
0.00
1.8
Calibrated Dn4000
1.6
1.4
1.2
1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8
Dn4000
Figure A7. Similar to Figure A6, but for AGNs in the COSMOS sample.
10 1
10 2
10 3
Dn4000: 1.4 Dn4000: 1.6 Dn4000: 1.8 Dn4000: 1.9 Dn4000: 1.9 Dn4000: 2.0
logM : 10.5 logM : 10.8 logM : 10.8 logM : 10.9 logM : 10.9 logM : 11.1
10 4 logSFR: 0.3 logSFR: -0.3 logSFR: -1.0 logSFR: -1.2 logSFR: -1.2 logSFR: -1.2
30 32 30 32 30 32 30 32 30 32 30 32
log(LX/M ) log(LX/M ) log(LX/M ) log(LX/M ) log(LX/M ) log(LX/M )
Figure B1. Distributions showing the probability of finding an AGN as a function of specific black hole accretion rate. Different panels have different Dn 4000.
logM : 18 logM :
4
logSFR: 16 logSFR:
14
AGN fraction (%)
Elliptical galaxies in the 4XMM sample Spiral galaxies in the 4XMM sample
logM : 2.0 logM :
1.25 logSFR: logSFR:
AGN fraction (%)
4 7.5
5.0
2
2.5
0 0.0
1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6
Dn4000 Dn4000
logM : 1.0 logM :
2.0 logSFR: logSFR:
2.5 1.5
log BHAR (M /yr)