GEK 116403 PG 7121 Estimating Gas Turbine Performance
GEK 116403 PG 7121 Estimating Gas Turbine Performance
GEK 116403 PG 7121 Estimating Gas Turbine Performance
GEK 116403
June 2009
GE Energy
These instructions do not purport to cover all details or variations in equipment nor to provide for every possible contingency to
be met in connection with installation, operation or maintenance. Should further information be desired or should particular
problems arise which are not covered sufficiently for the purchaser's purposes the matter should be referred to the GE Company.
© General Electric Company, 2009. GE Proprietary Information. All Rights Reserved.
GEK 116403 Estimating Gas Turbine Performance
The below will be found throughout this publication. It is important that the significance of
each is thoroughly understood by those using this document. The definitions are as follows:
NOTE
CAUTION
Indicates a potentially hazardous situation, which, if not avoided, could result in minor
or moderate injury or equipment damage.
WARNING
***DANGER***
TABLE OF CONTENTS
The following is a method for estimating gas turbine performance using performance correction curves
and site data (i.e., elevation, ambient temperature, inlet and exhaust pressure drops, and the type of fuel).
Both full load and part load performance calculations are described and illustrated. Typical examples are
provided for packaged power plants.
Performance curves are based on the ISO standard (59°F/15°C, 60% relative humidity and 14.7
psia/1.013 bar a) with normal inlet and exhaust system losses for a simple cycle unit. These curves do not
include the water or steam injection for NOx control. However, the effect of a known water or steam flow
can be calculated separately per the diluent effects curves.
Inlet conditioning can have a significant effect on performance. Below describe some inlet treatment
devices and the correction curves (if applicable) pertaining to them:
Inlet bleed heat (IBH): IBH is typically used for compressor control and part load emissions
compliance, and as such its effects have been included.
Evaporative Coolers: Evaporative coolers and fogger systems will have specific corrections pertaining
to operation of the unit with these devices activated.
Chillers: Effects of chiller coils or inlet heating are not included in these curves.
Instead, correction curve for ambient conditions are used along with the conditions measured at the gas
turbine inlet downstream of the treatment device.
This procedure should be used only for the approximation of performance at site conditions and not for
performance guarantees. Performance guarantees are shown in the “Performance Data” section. The
performance curves included are to illustrate the calculation procedure and do not reflect current
ratings.
Project Specific Gas Turbine Performance Curves are provided by GE Energy Application
Engineering/Operability & Performance Services. Contact your local GE representative for copies of the
applicable performance curves.
*Corrections D4, E4, and E6 have not been included as their correction impacts are negligible.
Sample Conditions:
2. Calculation of factors.
The ratings for the package power plant include a standard inlet and exhaust pressure drop as
stated with the ratings. Therefore the pressure drops used to calculate resultant output, heat rate,
exhaust flow, and exhaust temperature impacts are the pressure drops in excess of the standard
pressure drops.
The final correction is the multiplied effects of all the input parameters for output, heat rate, and
exhaust flow, as shown in the example below.
Exhaust temperature is calculated by adding the temperature increase due to ambient temperature
and pressure drops to the design value read from Curve 553H1228:
Part load output, heat rate and heat consumption are calculated in a similar manner as base load using the
part load heat consumption curve. Before using the output percent from the heat consumption curve, all
part load performance must be referenced to 59°F/15°C sample performance kWO
A. Method
1. At sample barometric pressure with sample inlet and exhaust pressure drops and at 59°F/15°C
ambient temperature, calculate the following base load performance parameters:
Output, kWO
This data then becomes the corrected values on which to base the part load calculations.
3. From the applicable performance curve, at the percent of load calculated from (2) above and at
the compressor inlet temperature, read the percent of design heat rate.
4. Exhaust flow and temperature are calculated in an analogous manner using corrected design
outputs as shown above, and the Part Load Effects (of Modulated Inlet Guide Vanes Curve) at
the appropriate ambient. The extreme right hand point of each ambient curve on the Part Load
Effects Curve represents the full open IGV position, the knee point in each curve represents the
closed IGV position, Note that this curve is for combined cycle machines only. Sample Part
Load Calculation.
The following sample part load calculations are for the MS7001 (EA) simple cycle package
power plant used previously.
Sample conditions:
kWO = kWi x A3 x A4 x A5 x A6 x A7
HRO = HRi x B3 x B4 x B5 x B6 x B7
HRO = 10296 x 1.0 x 1.0 x 1.0 x 1.007 x 1.0008=10376 Btu/kWh or 10945 kJ/kWh (LHV)
HCO = 88703 x 10296 x 1.0 x 1.0 x 1.0 x 0.997 x 0.978=890.51 x 106Btu/h or 939.3 x 106 kJ/h
(LHV)
Tx0 = Txi + D3 + D4 + D5 + D6 + D7
Wx0 = Wxi x E3 x E5 x E7
3. From Curve 553H1228 Sheet 34 at 66.6% design load and 90°F/32.2°C, Heat Rate-Ratio =
113.9%
4. Entering the Part Load Effects Curve (553H1228 Sheet 35 & 35) at the 66.6% output calculated
in Step 2 and, for the 90°F/32.2°C ambient curve;
WxS = Wx0 x Exhaust Flow-Ratio= 2326.7 x 0.736 = 1712 x 103 lb/h or 776.6 x 103 kg/h
The amount of steam or water injection required to meet a given NOx emission level is not available
from a curve because of the many variables impacting this value. In fact, the exact flow is typically
not finalized until the field Emissions Compliance Testing. However, given a specific flow value, the
resulting effect on output and Heat Rate can be determined using the Injection Effects Curves.
For example, taking the “dry” Output and Heat Rate Performance calculated from Example I and,
assuming GE has reported (for the specific conditions given) an estimated steam flow of 64760 lb/h
or 29370 kg/h (18 lb/s or 8.16 kg/s); The resulting output and heat rate would be:
= 83008 kW
Conversion Factors
To Convert To Multiply By
Atm kg/cm2 1.0333
Atm lb/in2 = PSI 14.7
Bars atm 0.9869
Bars lb/in2 14.5
Btu/h kcal/h 0.2520
Btu/h kJ/h 1.0548
Btu/hph kJ/kWh 1.4148
Btu/lb kJ/kg 2.326
ºF ºR ºF + 459.7
ºC ºF (ºC x 9/5) + 32
ºC ºK ºC + 273.2
Ft3/min l/s 0.4720
Ft3/min m3/min 0.02832
gal/mln l/s 0.06308
In. of mercury kg/cm2 0.03453
In. of water
(at 4ºC) kg/cm2 0.00254
in. of water
(at 4ºC) lb/in2 0.03613
J Btu 9.478 x 10–4
kg lb 2.205
kg/cm2 lb/in2 14.22
kg/m3 lb/ft3 0.06243
kW hp 1.341
lb/in2 Pa 6894.8
l/min ft3/s 5.886 x 10–4
l/min gal/s 0.004403
scf Nm3 0.0268
W Btu/h 3.4129
g GE Energy
General Electric Company
www.gepower.com