ReversibleRemovalofNatOccurringOrganics Sodium-1-1
ReversibleRemovalofNatOccurringOrganics Sodium-1-1
ReversibleRemovalofNatOccurringOrganics Sodium-1-1
3 OH
resins, as measured by the TOC test, is at least under- OH OH O O
O
O
100
review some of these relationships.
10
Table 1 shows the selectivity coefficients of the various
Selectivity reversal ions for gelular Type 1 and Type 2 anion resins compared
1
to the hydroxide ion. Those substances with the higher
selectivities are more difficult to regenerate off of the resin
0.1
1 10 100 1000 10000 with hydroxide. However, these resins are more easily
TDS, PPM as CaCO3 regenerated with sodium chloride because the relative
affinities of all the substances are lower against the chlo-
Figure 3 APPARENT SELECTIVITY- SULFATE / CHLORIDE ride ion. For the Type 1's, the affinity of the chloride is
from 11 (ResinTech SBG1P) to 25 (ResinTech SBG1)
times higher than the affinities for the hydroxide ion.
Symons work was focused on ways of reducing THM Therefore the selectivity coefficients for the listed sub-
precursors. His study included activated carbon. When stances against the chloride ion is 11 to 25 times lower.
used alone granular activated carbon (GAC) could only This makes the chloride ion significantly more effective as
treat about 1,000 bed volumes removing about 80% of a regenerant than the hydroxide ion. Note the high val-
the TOC before the onset of increased leakage. This is ues for lignosulfonate and benzene sulfonate. These are
believed to be due to its limited capacity and because of similar to the basic structure of the naturally occurring
surface blockage by large sized organics. The use of ion organics. It is believed that they have similar affinities for
exchange ahead of the GAC let the GAC exclusively deal the resin as the humic substances and are therefore use-
with the lower molecular weight unionized material pass- ful as models.
ing through the resin. This combination removed 93% to
mons11 showed that the same brine could be reused up
Table 1 to 9 times without loss of capacity or quality in TOC re-
ductions. So it is obvious that much longer relative re-
Relative Affinities generation times are needed for organic ions.
(OH=1)
Before discussing the importance of contact time to the
regeneration of the organic acid form anion resin, let us
first review the effect of contact time on the regeneration
Type 1 Type 1 Type 2 of softeners. The common cations come to 80 to 90% of
Standard Porous Standard equilibrium in about 5 minutes(10). It is standard practice
Gel Gel Gel to design softeners with regenerant times of about 30
minutes.
Lignosulfonate 800 400 120
Benzenesulfonate 500 253 75 Figure 5 shows how the change in regenerant contact
Salicylate 450 358 65 time affects operating capacities of softeners. Signifi-
Citrate 220 110 23
cantly the effect on operating capacity is about the same
Iodine 175 97 17
degree as the relative attainment of equilibrium versus
Nitrate 65 42 8
Bromide 50 31.1 6 time.
Chloride 22 11.1 3
Bicarbonate 6 3.6 2.3 Due to their slower diffusion rates, the regeneration of
Hydroxide 1 1 1 organics is considerably more rate sensitive than for com-
mon inorganic ions. It has been shown that the
equilibration times for aquatic organic matter is measured
in hours (12), not minutes. For example, aromatic amines
The separation factor, which is the same as the selectivity (10), like diphenylamine, reached less than 10% of final
coefficient for monovalent exchange, is what determines equilibrium after 4 hours. The same phenomenon has
the efficiency of a regenerant. It can be used to calculate been shown to apply to anion resins (5, 6).
the theoretical regeneration level per unit of regenerant.
In the case of multivalent ions the separation factor is
more closely related to the apparent selectivity coefficient,
•Chloride versus Hydroxide Regenerants
which varies with the total ionic concentration as shown
for the sulfate/hydroxide ion pair in Figure 3. When the •1
•TYPE 1 CHLORIDE K=30 TO 36
regenerant concentration is about 10% the apparent se- •0.9 •Salt regeneration
lectivity and the selectivity coefficient are about the same. •0.8 •TYPE 2 CHLORIDE K=50
So we can use the selectivity coefficient as parameters.
•0.7
•0.6 •TYPE2 OH K=120
The relative separation factor of chloride for the resin,
•0.5 •Hydroxide regeneration
during regeneration of a Type 1 resin with 10% brine ver-
sus 4% NaOH, is about 11 to 25 times higher than hy- •0.4
•TYPE1 Porous Gel OH K=400
droxide. Therefore it is much more effective in removing •0.3
•TYPE 1 Std Gel OH K=800
organics. •0.2
•0.1
•K= Separation factor, organic / regenerant
The chloride cycle regeneration of organics can be seen •0
to be as effective for Type 1 resins as for the Type 2's.
The Type 1's are more chemically stable and can be
made with higher water retentions (low crosslinker levels)
•Figure 4
therefore they can remove higher molecular weight or-
ganics than the Type 2's. This can best be seen in Fig-
ure 4, which shows the theoretical regeneration versus Large molecular sizes make for slower gel phase diffu-
dose levels based on selectivity coefficients for chloride sion rates, so does higher selectivity and valence. Wil-
and hydroxide regenerations of lignosulfonate. son12 studied Type 2 resins that had been fouled, by
equilibrating them with brine/caustic solutions in batch
This gives a good picture of the effect on regeneration equilibrium experiments. He studied the amount of
efficiency of the relative selectivity coefficients. Keep in organics removed from the resin as a function of time. It
mind these curves are based on the assumption that was found that over 16 hours was required for what only
enough contact time has been given for the regenerant appeared to be equilibration. However, it took only 4 to 6
and resin to reach equilibrium. So we see that the porous hours to reach 70% to 80% of the 16 hour amount. Wil-
Type 1 gel resins can remove TOC substances and be son's data is shown in Figure 6. Data such as this could
well regenerated with chloride regenerants. In reality this be used to construct an operating capacity factor curve
is not the case. For example, when brine regeneration similar to that of Figure 5.
was carried out in the same time as for inorganic ions
(using short contact times and no prolonged soak) Sym- A comparison of Figures 5 and 6 shows remarkable simi-
was very beneficial. The more NaOH that was added the
higher the amount of organic matter regenerated off of
Parameter 100% NaCl Levels (applied @ 10%) the resin.
1.1
FRACTION OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY
1
The pK of the carboxylic groups in humic acids has been
0.9
determined to be between 1 and 6 (Gjessing4). When the
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
50 ML SOLN. 1 GR. 18 hr. FOULED TYPE 2
0.4 150
0.3 140
130
0.2 120
Wilson varied the concentration of the brine and found At ResinTech Inc. we have developed a test protocol for
that the amount of organics pushed off of the resin varied fouled anion resins. First we determine total and salt
directly with the concentration of the regenerant his re- splitting capacity in the normal manner. Then the sample
sults are presented in Figure 7. This shows the impor- undergoes a comprehensive organic fouling treatment
tance of equilibrium relationships. process, which includes hot brine and caustic. Then we
retest the resin and make a before and after comparison.
pH not only affects ionization levels in weakly acid mate- Typically the only difference we see is in salt splitting ca-
rial, it can also affect solubility. For example phenol, an pacity. The total capacity usually stays the same while
aromatic carboxylic acid, is soluble to about able 7.5% in the salt splitting capacity increases after treatment.
cold water as the acid, but as the sodium salt its solubility
reaches almost 20%. Wilson also changed the regener- The total capacity test requires the resin to be treated
ant formulas by adding various levels of either NaOH or with hydrochloric acid followed by elution with NaNO3.
hydrochloric acid. The effects of these factors on organic The low pH created by the acid forces the organic acids
elution are presented in graphical form in Figure 8. The to recombine with hydrogen and become unionized but
acidification of the brine regenerant significantly reduced they still remain inside the resin due to either lack of sol-
the regeneration. Adding sodium hydroxide to the brine ubility or insufficient contact time, or both. This allows the
fouled salt splitting site to be converted to its chloride
form, which is then measured by the nitrate elution step.
50 M L 2 N N aC l/1N N a O H 2 G R fld T Y P E
11 0% 2
The organics are not very soluble and diffuse slowly (4, 8,
100 % 9, 10),otherwise the acid treatment would be an easy way
P erce nt H U M IC acid
90%
80% to remove fouling. In the salt splitting capacity test the
resin is converted to the chloride form under alkaline con-
re m o ved
70%
60% ditions before the nitrate elution step so the organics re-
50%
40%
main ionically active and fixed to the salt splitting sites
30%
they are attached too. Therefore these sites cannot be
20% converted to the chloride form so they are not measured
10% by the nitrate elution step.
0%
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
COEFFICIENT, K
coefficient of the anion portion of the regenerants is quite
SELECTIVITY
good. Figure 9 also confirms the importance of selectiv-
ity in regeneration effectiveness. Indirectly this shows the
importance of proper concentration control in order to en-
hance the regeneration of the multivalent TOC sub-
stances (see Figure 3 also).
Chloride Bromide Iodine Nitrate
Affinities (Type 2) Humic acid elution (NaCl)
TYPE OF SALT
50 ML 1N NaCl 1 GR. 18h. fouled TYPE 2
170 Figure 9 HUMIC ACID REMOVAL & SELECTIVITY COEFFICIENTS
160
150
140
130
120 weight ranges that were studied. Figure 11 contains the
PPM HUMIC ACID
110
100
90
data for all 4 ranges from Figure 10 in a single graph.
80
70
60 The resins Symons11 used included gel and macroporous
50
40 types, styrenic and acrylics. Figures 10 and 11 show
30
20 that from below 1,000 to over 10,000 molecular weight,
10
0 the Preuss factor provides an excellent correlation of in-
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
creasing absorption capabilities (less leakage).The idea
NORMALITY OF ALKALINITY OR ACID
NaOH acid
that the bigger the lake each ion exchange group has
surrounding it, the more effective it was in removing the
Figure 8 ALKALINITY/ ACID VS HUMIC ACID REMOVED various ions holds up well.
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
MOLES GEL PHASE WATER PER EXCHANGE SITE MOLES GEL PHASE WATER PER EXCHANGE SITE
Figure 10
Figure 11
The Type 2 resin has the lowest selectivity for lignosulfi- Water retention, %
nate and gives 3 times the regenerable removal rate at
10 pounds of NaOH regeneration than the standard Type Figure 12 Water Retention vs Relative Water
1 resin. This shows why Type 2 resins resist fouling better
than the Type 1's.
When resins become fouled they are usually rejuvenated
The higher water retention Type 1 resins have lower se-
using salt. As you can see in Figure 4 the use of salt,
Ta b le 2
and enhanced biological activity has not been determined.
M o le c u la r w e ig h t d is tr ib u t io n o f T .O . C There is not enough information to say any more.
80 0.9
70 0.8
60 0.7
50 0.6
40 0.5
30 0.4
over 10 K 1 - 10 K less than 1 K
0.3
MOLECULAR WEIGHT RANGES
SOUTHWEST MID ATLANTIC 0.2
1/2 PHENOL Phenol 1K - 5K
>10K 5K - 10K Dicarboxylic
Figure 13 TOC MOLECULAR WEIGHT DISTRIBUTION
Molecular equivalent sizes
Figure 14 CaCO 3Equivalency to TOC
Compared to the normal sodium hydroxide regeneration It has been shown that the lower molecular weight portion
this salt treatment can elute an order of magnitude more of the organic matter breaks through at the same time as
organics from a Type 1 resin. The importance of the post the sulfates (7, 11, 14, 15). After the sulfate breakthrough,
injection contact time has also been noted by others (7, 14, the net organic removal rate dropped by 70% during Sy-
15). This explains why "brine squeezes" for organic fouling
mons' study. The sulfates at the bottom of the column
treatments, when done properly, can be so effective. were displacing some of the previously loaded TOC.
Symons11, and before him Wiser13, determined the mo- If the goal is reduction of the higher molecular weight
lecular weight distribution of the natural organics their re- TOC's, then the service cycle can extend past the sulfate
sults are shown in Table 2 and Figure 13. Figure 13 may break. For example, if you are trying to protect the work-
also show something about the geographical or climatic ing D.I. resin from fouling, you should be able to go well
influences on the molecular weight distribution. It is ap- past the sulfate break. However, this should not be done
parent that the more northern water (the Virginia water) if the resin is protecting a high purity water system and
has a higher molecular weight distribution than the water you want the maximum amount of TOC reduction. In this
in Houston, Texas. Whether this is because of a higher case, the system should have an activated carbon bed
residence time of the organics in the water, or longer after the salt cycle strong base resin bed.
sunlight hours to supply more UV or warmer temperature
Therefore it is recommended that a minimum temperature
Table 3 of 120o F (not to exceed the design temperature of the
vessel, internals or salt cycle temperature limit of the resin
Ionic Strengths of T.O.C. *
being treated) and a minimum dose level of 15 pounds of
salt per cubic foot be used. The minimum injection time
Equivalency
should be 2 hours followed by a minimum 10-hour soak
meq of COOH per before beginning the displacement rinse.
ppm as CaCO 3
gram of T.O.C.
M.W. per ppm T.O.C.
10 K 11.03 .55
Multiple treatments can be used as a preventative meas-
1-10K 13.13 .66 ure when performed on a regular basis. A 5 pound mini-
1- 5K 15.05 .75 mum dose level with 1 hour injection time and a combined
< 1K ND displacement rinse and soak time of 1 hour is recom-
*Calculated from Symons' data of carboxylic content of mended. The frequency of this treatment depends on the
T.O.C. values in Lake Houston Water percent of TOC of the anion load. It is suggested that for
standard resins the TOC loading factor be kept to a small
We have found that for maximum reduction of organics it fraction, probably less than 25% of the total resin capacity.
is best to limit the service cycle to the sulfate breaks, and We intend to provide more specific information in the fu-
to polish with activated carbon to remove non-ionics. We ture.
compute the resins' throughput capacity based on the sul-
fate plus the TOC loading. We recommend a minimum
one hour brine injection time and use a rating factor of SUMMARY and FUTURE WORK
45% or less of the total capacity of the resin depending on
the resin. The regenerant solution should be 10 pounds of I have shown, through historical developments, how we
salt in a 10% solution with an additional 2% of sodium hy- come to know that naturally occurring organic substances
droxide applied at a temperature of 120o F to a pre- are best dealt with by ion exchange resins. In this paper
warmed bed, not less than 70o F. these substances were examined only as ions. We have
reviewed recent and historical work to demonstrate that
If only partial reduction or maximum throughput is desired, equilibrium and kinetic factors, especially time, are as im-
the service cycle can be run past the sulfate break. Once portant in defining regeneration (desorption) effectiveness
sulfate breakthrough occurs, the resin will continue to re- as the dose level of the regenerant. It has been shown
move the higher molecular weight organics. However, all that the naturally occurring organic substances have affini-
or most of the lower molecular weight organics, those with ties for the resin similar in degree to sulfate.
lower selectivities than sulfate, will be discharged as they
are displaced by sulfates and the high molecular weight From the information presented in this paper, we can de-
TOC's. During the later stage of the exhaustion cycle, the scribe the properties of what would make an efficient or-
overall removal of organics may drop to as low as 30%, ganic scavenger:
depending on the molecular weight distribution. After the A. It must have sufficient gel phase water to physically
sulfate breakthrough, TOC levels will rise and the concen- accommodate the organic matter.
tration of the lower molecular weight TOC's may rise B. It must have sufficient ion exchange functionality to
above their influent levels. This style of operation could provide acceptable capacity.
be useful for using a scavenger resin ahead of or as a
separate layer in the same vessel on top of a cation resin C. It must have excellent osmotic shock characteris-
in a softener to remove or reduce color. However, unless tics to withstand the internal stresses during load-
the water is presoftened, the regenerant should not in- ing and regeneration.
clude sodium hydroxide, in order to avoid hardness pre-
cipitation. The operating capacity will be less than 20% of ResinTech SIR-22P is an example of such a product. It
the total resin capacity. has a gel phase water retention of approximately 75% and
a total capacity over 10 Kgrs. per cubic foot. ResinTech
Let us look at how the information presented here can be SIR-22P has a Preuss factor of over two and one half
used to reclaim fouled resins. An organically fouled resin times the standard resins, including the acrylic types. In
by definition is an anion resin that is no longer working an ongoing trial it has already demonstrated its ability to
well because it is loaded with too many organics for it to run to complete organic breakthrough without fouling and
continue to be operated as an exchanger of inorganic ions provide consistently high TOC reduction while operated in
in an efficient manner. The goal of the treatment is to re- the chloride cycle. Its detailed performance characteris-
move enough organics to return the resin to successful tics will be the topic in a future chapter of this work.
operation. This requires sufficient dose, temperature,
concentration, and contact time. This then concludes the first portion of this endeavor.
ResinTech Inc. is continuing the study of ways to further
Time is the most important of these parameters, but all quantify the kinetic and equilibrium factors discussed here.
must be properly controlled. If the regenerant and resin Our studies include an ongoing full-scale trial of SIR-22P.
are too cold it will decrease the kinetics to the point where
the necessary contact time will increase significantly.
Bibliography 9. Kunin, Robert, The Role of Organic Matter in Water
Treatment - A Universal Theory, Amber-hi-Lites,
1. Anderson, Robert E., Estimation of Ion Exchange 179 (Spring, 1986)
Process Limits by Selectivity Calculations, Jour-
nal of Chromatography, 201 (1980) 10. Kunin, Robert, Ion Exchange Resin, Robert Krieger
Publishing Co. (1972)
2. Abrams, I.M., Removal of Organics from Water by
Synthetic Resinous Adsobents, Chemical Engi- 11. Symons, J.M., Fu, P.L-K, Kim, P. H-S, The Use of
neering Progress Symposium Series, 106-112 (1969) Anion Exchange Resins for the Removal of Natu-
ral Organic Mater from Municipal Water, Interana-
3. Fisher, S., personal communication, August, 1993 tion Water Conference Proceedings Book, 92-120
(Pittsburgh, PA, October, 1992)
4. Gjessing, E.T., Gel- and Ultramembrane Filtration of
Aquatic Humus; A Comparison of the Two Meth- 12. Wilson, A.L., Organic Fouling of Strongly Basic
ods, Schw. Z. Hydrol, 286-293, (1973) Anion Exchange Resin, J. Applied Chemicstry, Vol.
9, 352-359 (1959)
5. Kressman, T.R., and J.A. Kitchener, J. Chem. Soc.,
1201 (1949) 13. Wiser, S.L., Lee, Y.H., Stroh, C.R., O'Brien, Mr. Re-
moval of Organics from Secondary Makeup Water
6. Kunin, R., and R.J. Myers, Discussions Faradya -- Case Study, International Water Conference Pro-
Soc., 114 (1949) ceedings Book, 1-17 (Pittsburgh, PA, November,
1985)
7. Kunin, R.F., Suffet, I., Activated Carbon Adsorption
of Organics from the Aqueous Phase, Ann Arbor 14. Wolff, J.J., Strong Base Anion Exchangers and
Science: Ann Arbor, Vol. 2, 425. (1980) Organic Matters, Dia-prosium Bulletin, 68.C.2
(1968)
8. Kunin, Robert, The Role of Organics in Water
Treatment, Amber-hi-lites, 168 (Autum, 1968) 15. Wolff, J.J., Organic Matters Scavengers, Dia-
prosium Bulletin, 68.C.3.A (1968)