Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 10 views

    April 14-27 DLLL pr1

    Uploaded by

    Race De Villa
    This document is a daily lesson log for a class on research in daily life. It outlines the objectives, content, procedures, and evaluation for lessons on selecting, citing, and synthesizing related literature. The objectives are for students to properly select, cite, synthesize, and write a review of related literature while following ethical standards. The content focuses on learning from others and reviewing literature. The procedures describe priming activities, discussions, and workshops to introduce and discuss the concepts. Formative evaluations include written outputs from the students. Reflection notes the attainment of objectives and the mastery levels of students.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    April 14-27 DLLL pr1

    Uploaded by

    Race De Villa
    10 views3 pages
    This document is a daily lesson log for a class on research in daily life. It outlines the objectives, content, procedures, and evaluation for lessons on selecting, citing, and synthesizing related literature. The objectives are for students to properly select, cite, synthesize, and write a review of related literature while following ethical standards. The content focuses on learning from others and reviewing literature. The procedures describe priming activities, discussions, and workshops to introduce and discuss the concepts. Formative evaluations include written outputs from the students. Reflection notes the attainment of objectives and the mastery levels of students.

    Original Description:

    Lesson Plan in Practical Research 1

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document is a daily lesson log for a class on research in daily life. It outlines the objectives, content, procedures, and evaluation for lessons on selecting, citing, and synthesizing related literature. The objectives are for students to properly select, cite, synthesize, and write a review of related literature while following ethical standards. The content focuses on learning from others and reviewing literature. The procedures describe priming activities, discussions, and workshops to introduce and discuss the concepts. Formative evaluations include written outputs from the students. Reflection notes the attainment of objectives and the mastery levels of students.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    10 views3 pages

    April 14-27 DLLL pr1

    Uploaded by

    Race De Villa
    This document is a daily lesson log for a class on research in daily life. It outlines the objectives, content, procedures, and evaluation for lessons on selecting, citing, and synthesizing related literature. The objectives are for students to properly select, cite, synthesize, and write a review of related literature while following ethical standards. The content focuses on learning from others and reviewing literature. The procedures describe priming activities, discussions, and workshops to introduce and discuss the concepts. Formative evaluations include written outputs from the students. Reflection notes the attainment of objectives and the mastery levels of students.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    School RAMON NATIONAL HIGH Grade Level XI

    DAILY LESSON LOG SCHOOL


    Teacher RACEPER ROMULUS B. DE VILLA Learning Areas Research in Daily Life 1
    Teaching Week 8 Quarter Third Quarter
    Session 1 Session 2 Session 3 Session 4 Session 5
    (Remedial
    Time : 7:30-8:30
    Dates: April 17-20, 2023
    I. OBJECTIVES
    A. Content Standard The learner demonstrates understanding of:
    1. the criteria in selecting, citing, and synthesizing related literature
    2. ethical standards in writing the related literature
    B. Performance standard The learner is able
    1. select, cite, and synthesize properly related literature
    2. use sources according to ethical standards
    3. present written review of related literature
    C. Learning Competencies The learner…
    /Objectives. Write the 1. selects relevant literature CS_RS11-IIIf-j-1
    LC Code for each 2. cites related literature using standard style (APA, MLA or Chicago Manual of Style) CS_RS11-IIIf-j-2
    3. synthesizes information from relevant literature CS_RS11-IIIf-j-3
    4. writes coherent review of literature CS_RS11-IIIf-j-4
    5. follows ethical standards in writing related literature CS_RS11-IIIf-j-5
    6. presents written review of literature CS_RS11-IIIf-j-6
    II. CONTENT Learning from Others and Reviewing the Literature
    III. REFERENCES
    D. Teacher’s Guide pages
    E. Learner’s materials Pages
    F. Other references Baraceros, E. L. (2016). Practical Research 1 pp. . Manila: Rex Bookstore.
    Prieto, N. G. et. al. (2017). Practical Research 1 pp. . Lorimar Publishing, Inc.
    IV. PROCEDURES
    G. Review of the previous  Recall of how  Review of the group Examination Day Examination Day Holiday
    lesson related literature is output
    to be cited
    H. Priming activities to  After our lesson on
    introduce the day’s lesson how literature is to
    be cited and written,
    you are now ready
    to write the related
    literature of your
    study.
    I. Discussion of the  Reports on the  Critiquing the written
    concepts/skills(Anchor on progress of the related literature
    the 4A’s) study per group
     Group workshop on
    writing the related
    literature.
    V. EVALUATION/FORMATIVE  Written output  Written output
    (Any form of summative
    test/performance test)
    Give brief description & Sample
    Questions

    VI. REFLECTION

    J. Are all objectives


    attained?
    Why? Why not?

    K. What went well and what


    went wrong?

    L. Mastery level of the


    Learner
     %. of learners who did not
    master the
    competency/ies (80%
    below)
     % of those who averagely
    mastered the
    competency/ies (at 81-
    90%)
     % of those who
    proficiently mastered the
    competency/ies (at 91-
    100%)

    VII. UTILIZED LOCALIZED/


    INDIGENIZED LEARNING
    RESOURCES (Kindly
    identify)

    VIII. Log

    Prepared by: Checked by: Noted by:

    RACEPER ROMULUS B. DE VILLA ESTRELA E. MANUEL, MAEd MARILYN V. RAMOS, MAEd


    Special Science Teacher I Master Teacher II Head Teacher III – OIC, Office of the Principal

    You might also like