Argumentative Essay
Argumentative Essay
Argumentative Essay
Introduction:
For centuries, the shape of the Earth has been a topic of debate among scientists, philosophers, and conspiracy
theorists. While some believe the Earth is flat, the overwhelming evidence supports the theory that the Earth is round.
This essay will explore the evidence for a round Earth and debunk common flat Earth theories.
Body Paragraph 1:
The first evidence for a round Earth is observations of the Earth's shadow during a lunar eclipse. The Earth's shadow
on the moon is always curved, indicating that the Earth must be round. Additionally, the curvature of the Earth can be
seen from high altitudes, such as from an airplane or space shuttle.
Body Paragraph 2:
Another piece of evidence for a round Earth is the behavior of ships at sea. As ships sail away from the shore, they
disappear over the horizon, with the bottom of the ship disappearing first. This phenomenon can only be explained by
the curvature of the Earth.
Body Paragraph 3:
Flat Earth theorists often argue that the horizon appears flat, therefore the Earth must be flat. However, this is due to
the limitations of human vision. The horizon appears flat because the curvature of the Earth is too slight to be detected
by the human eye.
Counterargument:
Flat Earth theorists often argue that the Earth is flat because they do not feel the Earth moving. However, the Earth's
rotation is slow and occurs at a constant speed, making it difficult to detect. Additionally, gravity keeps us firmly
planted on the ground, making it difficult to feel the Earth's movement.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the evidence for a round Earth is overwhelming. Observations of the Earth's shadow, the behavior of
ships at sea, and the curvature of the Earth seen from high altitudes all support the theory that the Earth is round.
While flat Earth theories may be appealing to some, they are not supported by the evidence. It is important to rely on
scientific evidence and critical thinking when exploring the mysteries of the universe.
In this argumentative essay, the evidence for a round Earth is presented and common flat Earth theories are debunked.
The essay follows a clear structure, presents evidence to support the argument, addresses opposing viewpoints, and
provides a conclusion that summarizes the main points of the essay.
Title: The Controversy of Jeepney Phaseout in the Philippines: Balancing Environmental and Economic Concerns
Introduction:
Jeepneys have been an iconic mode of transportation in the Philippines for decades, but their environmental impact
has led to a controversial phaseout plan. While some argue that jeepneys are a source of pollution and must be
replaced with modern vehicles, others argue that the phaseout plan will have negative economic consequences for
jeepney drivers and their families. This essay will explore the controversy of jeepney phaseout in the Philippines and
provide strategies for balancing environmental and economic concerns.
Body Paragraph 1:
The first argument in favor of jeepney phaseout is the need to reduce pollution and improve air quality. Jeepneys are
known for their high emissions and contribute to air pollution in urban areas. Replacing old jeepneys with modern,
low-emission vehicles can help to reduce pollution and improve air quality, which is a major public health concern.
Body Paragraph 2:
Another argument in favor of jeepney phaseout is the need to modernize the transportation system. Jeepneys are often
criticized for their poor safety features, lack of accessibility, and inefficient routes. Replacing jeepneys with modern
vehicles can help to improve safety, accessibility, and efficiency, leading to a better transportation system for all.
Body Paragraph 3:
However, opponents of jeepney phaseout argue that it will have negative economic consequences for jeepney drivers
and their families. Jeepney drivers often rely on their vehicles as a source of income, and the cost of replacing their
vehicles with modern ones may be too high. This can lead to job loss and financial instability for jeepney drivers and
their families.
Counterargument:
Some may argue that jeepney phaseout is not necessary, and that alternative solutions such as retrofitting and
improving the current fleet can be implemented. However, this may not be enough to address the environmental and
safety concerns posed by jeepneys.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the controversy surrounding jeepney phaseout in the Philippines highlights the need to balance
environmental and economic concerns. While jeepneys are an important part of Philippine culture and history, they
also contribute to pollution and safety concerns. It is important to find solutions that address these issues while also
supporting jeepney drivers and their families. This can be achieved through a combination of modernization efforts,
financial support for drivers, and alternative modes of transportation that prioritize sustainability and accessibility.
In this argumentative essay, the controversy of jeepney phaseout in the Philippines is presented, and strategies for
balancing environmental and economic concerns are provided. The essay follows a clear structure, presents evidence
to support the argument, addresses opposing viewpoints, and provides a conclusion that summarizes the main points
of the essay.