Block 1

PGPS S4 01
Exam Code: SOM
Social Movements
SEMESTER IV
POLITICAL SCIENCE
BLOCK : 1
KRISHNA KANTA HANDIQUI STATE OPEN UNIVERSITY

Subject Experts
Prof. Jayanta Krishna Sarmah, Gauhati University
Dr. Shantanu Chakravorty, Cotton University
Dr. Dhruba Pratim Sharma, Gauhati University
Course Co-ordinator: Dr. Bipul Das, KKHSOU
SLM Preparation Team

UNITS CONTRIBUTORS
1, 2 Hemasri Devi, Pub Kamrup College, Baihata Chariali
3 Dr. Subhrajit Konwer, Gauhati University.
4 Mallika Pegu, K. R. B. Girls' College, Guwahati.
5&6 Tridib Bharali, Research Scholar, IIIT, Guwahati.
7&8 Mallika Pegu, K. R. B. Girls' College, Guwahati.
Editorial Team
Content : Prof. Jayanta Krishna Sarmah, Gauhati University

Language : Dr. Prasenjit Das, KKHSOU
Structure, Format & Graphics : Pacific Laser Prints, Ganeshguri, Guwahati-781006
January, 2020
ISBN : 978-93-89955-24-83-978-93-89559-05-7
This Self Learning Material (SLM) of the Krishna Kanta Handiqui State Open University
is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0
License (international): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Printed and published by Registrar on behalf of the Krishna Kanta Handiqui State Open
University.
Head Office : Patgaon, Rani Gate, Guwahati-781 017;
City Office : Housefed Complex, Dispur, Guwahati-781 006; Website: www.kkhsou.in
The University acknowledges with thanks the financial support provided by the
Distance Education Bureau, UGC, for the preparation of this study material.
MASTER OF ARTS
POLITICAL SCIENCE
CONTENTS
Page No.
Unit 1 : Social Movement 7-20

Meaning and Definition of Social Movements; Historical Background;
Features of Social Movements; Importance of Social Movements
Unit 2 : Types of Social Movements 21-40
Various phases and types of Social Movements ; Determinants of
Social Movements; Different Approaches to Social Movements;
Causes of Social Movements and their outcomes
Unit 3 : Ideology of Social Movements 41-62
Ideology of Social Movements, Distinguishing Social Movements from
Social Institutions and Social Associations; Organizational and
Leadership dynamics of Social Movement; Role of Leadership in
Social Movements
Unit 4 : Durkheim's Concept of Anomie; Concept of Relative Deprivation 63-78
Theories of Social Movements, Anomie Theory, Durkheim's Concept
of Anomie; Concept of Relative Deprivation
Unit 5 : Social Movements and Social Change 79-98
Meaning and Definition of Social Change; Factors responsible for
Social Change; Different Theories of Social Change; Impact of Social
Change; Reform, Revival, Revolution and Counter Movements
Unit 6 : Marxist and Post-Marxist Theories of Social Movements 99-114
Marxist Theory of Social Movement, State and Societal Revolution
in Capitalist Society; Post-Marxist Theories of Social Movement:
Gramsci's Perception, Louis Althusser's Structural Perspective, Nicos
Poulantzas' perspective on Social Movements
Unit 7 : Weberian Theory of Social Action 115-130
Weberian Theory of Action: Types of Social Action, Features of Social
Action
Unit 8 : Talcott Parsons' Theory of Social Action 131-143
Talcott Parsons' Structural-Functionalism, Parsons' Theory of Social
Action
COURSE INTRODUCTION
The first course of the Fourth Semester of MA Programme in Political Science of KKHSOU is
titled as "Social Movements." It is designed to help the learners to have a clear understanding of the
various dimensions of Social movements. It is supposed that the learners of the Master Degree
Programme in Political Science should have thorough knowledge about the concept of social movements.
Keeping this in view, the course begins with the concept of social movements and its historical background
which have significantly helped in the development of the concept of social movements.
The first unit of the course deals with the concept of social movements. In this unit, the meaning
and definition of social movements; historical background; features of social movements and Importance
of social movements are discussed. The second unit of the course discusses the various phases and
types of social movements, its determinants and different approaches to social movements. In this unit,
the causes of social movements and their outcomes are also discussed. In the third unit, ideology of
social movements, distinguishing social movements from social institutions and social associations;
organizational and leadership dynamics of social movement and role of leadership in social movements
are explained. Through this unit, the learners will be familiarised with the various aspects of ideology
and leadership dynamics. The fourth unit is related to the Durkheim's concept of Anomie; concept of
Relative Deprivation. The theories of social movements, anomie theory, Durkheim's concept of anomie;
concept of relative deprivation are discussed in this unit. Similarly, the meaning and definition of social
change, factors responsible for social change, different theories of social change, impact of social
change, reform, revival, revolution and counter movements are analysed in the fifth unit. The sixth unit
deals with the Marxist and Post-Marxist theories of social movements. It is related with Marxist theory of
social movement, State and Societal Revolution in Capitalist Society, Post-Marxist theories of social
movement: Gramsci's perception, Louis Althusser's Structural Perspective and Nicos Poulantzas'
perspective on social movement. The seventh unit discusses the Weberian theory of action: types of
social action and features of social action. The unit eight is dealt with Talcott Parsons' Structural-
Functionalism and Parsons' Theory of Social Action.
The unit nine deals with the nature and dynamics of new social movements. In this unit, discussions
are made about meaning, nature, dynamics and impact of new social movements. Accordingly, the role
of the peasant movements are discussed in the unit tenth. Here, meaning, nature, organization, origin
and development of the peasant movement are also explained. The eleventh unit deals with the origin
and development, nature, kinds and significance of labour and trade union movements in India. In unit
twelve, discussions are made on meaning and nature of various environmental movements in India
namely- Narmada Bachao Andolon and Chipko movement. The significance of environmental movements
in India are also discussed here. The thirteenth unit highlights the concept of ethnicity, origin and
developments of autonomy movements in Assam and factors responsible for the growth of autonomy
movement in Assam including Karbi-Dimasa and Bodo movement. The fourteenth unit focusses on the
issue of the meaning and nature of identity movement in Assam, origin and development of the Assam
movement and its features and consequences. The fifteenth unit deals with the emergence of women's
movement in north east India, characteristics of women's movements in north east India and role of
Meira Paibis and Naga Mothers' Association (NMA).
The course "Social Movements" is divided into two blocks- Block 1 and Block 2. Block 1 contains
eight units (Unit 1 - 8) and Block 2 contains seven units (Unit 9 - 15).
INTRODUCTION TO BLOCK 1
The first course of the Fourth Semester of MA Programme in Political Science of KKHSOU is titled
as "Social Movements." The first block of this course contains eight units- (Units 1-8).
The first unit of the course deals with the concept of social movements. In this unit, the meaning
and definition of social movements; historical background; features of social movements and Importance
of social movements are discussed. The second unit of the course discusses the various phases and
types of social movements, its determinants and different approaches to social movements. In this unit,
the causes of social movements and their outcomes are also discussed. In the third unit, ideology of
social movements, distinguishing social movements from social institutions and social associations;
organizational and leadership dynamics of social movement and role of leadership in social movements
are explained. Through this unit, the learners will be familiarised with the various aspects of ideology
and leadership dynamics. The fourth unit is related to the Durkheim's concept of Anomie; concept of
Relative Deprivation. The theories of social movements, anomie theory, Durkheim's concept of anomie;
concept of relative deprivation are discussed in this unit. Similarly, the meaning and definition of social
change, factors responsible for social change, different theories of social change, impact of social
change, reform, revival, revolution and counter movements are analysed in the fifth unit. The sixth unit
deals with the Marxist and Post-Marxist theories of social movements. It is related with Marxist theory of
social movement, State and Societal Revolution in Capitalist Society, Post-Marxist theories of social
movement: Gramsci's perception, Louis Althusser's Structural Perspective and Nicos Poulantzas'
perspective on social movement. The seventh unit discusses the Weberian theory of action: types of
social action and features of social action. The unit eight is dealt with Talcott Parsons' Structural-
Functionalism and Parsons' Theory of Social Action.
While going through the units of the block, you will find that the units are further divided into
certain sections and sub-sections, wherever necessary, for your better understanding. Besides, in order
to give you additional information on certain relevant topics, you will find a category called "LET US
KNOW" after the sections in each unit. Another category that has been included at the end of each
section of a particular unit is "CHECK YOUR PROGRESS". The purpose of this category is to help you
to asses for yourself as to how thoroughly you have understood a particular section. You may then
match your answers with "ANSWERS TO CHECK YOUR PROGRESS" given at the end of each unit.
The section "FURTHER READING" in each unit contains the names of a few books which you might
want to consult if you are interested in learning more elaborately about the concepts discussed in a
particular unit. Furthermore, the category called "POSSIBLE QUESTIONS" is intended to give you a
hint of the type of questions you are likely to get in the examination.
6 Social Movements
UNIT 1: SOCIAL MOVEMENT
UNIT STRUCTURE
1.1 Learning Objectives

1.2 Introduction
1.3 Meaning and Definition of Social Movements
1.4 Historical Background of Social Movements
1.5 Features of Social Movements
1.6 Importance of Social Movements
1.7 Let Us Sum Up
1.8 Further Reading
1.9 Answers to Check Your Progress
1.10 Possible Questions
1.1 LEARNING OBJECTIVES
After going through this unit, you will be able to:

l understand the meaning and definition of social movements
l explain the historical background of social movements
l discuss the features of Social Movements
l know about the importance of social movements.
1.2 INTRODUCTION
Social Movements are collective expression of masses against the

political and social authority to bring changes which the common people
inspire for or which might bring common welfare. It aims to develop
consensus regarding certain changes or demands of the population. It is
mostly unorganisational activity or loosely organised activity performed in
a group and administered by a number of people. It is a shared group
activity based mostly on informal networks. It addresses the problems and
evils of society. It requires sustained collective action over a long period of
time. Considering this matter, the chapter tends to develop a comprehensive
deliberation on meaning, historical background, features, types and
importance of social movements.
Social Movements 7
Unit 1 Social Movement
1.3 MEANING AND DEFINITION OF SOCIAL

MOVEMENTS
In general, people indulge in organized dissatisfaction against

inadequate policies, activities and feeling of injustice created by the authority.
This may lead to the emergence of social movements. Collectively social
movements act for bringing changes in the socio-political structure. In order
to implement a good social policy or to prevent the society from a harmful
policy direction, people usually resort to social movement and stand for
better well-being.
In protest against observed inequalities, oppression and unjustified

social, political, economic and cultural demands, a large number of people
mostly in informal grouping come together and raise their demands. At
their core, social movements are not about “polite debate” or “invited spaces”
of interaction between the state and the society.
Thus, different large or informal or unorganized groups protest against

specific socio-political issues and try to reframe them for the greater social
convenience which can be identified as social movements. In other words,
they develop resistance against undue policies and stand for bringing greater
social change.
Different scholars of different fields conceptualize social movements

from their own theoretical formulation. Such as Karl Marx’s view of social
movements tends to nullify capitalism and believes in revolutionary
changes to set up a conducive environment for the labourers, farmers
and socially weaker classes. Max Weber’s concept highlights the role of
a charismatic leader or authority to bring a new height to the aspired
aims.
The term “social movements” was introduced in 1848 by the German

Sociologist Lorenz Von Stein in his book Socialist and Communist
Movements since the Third French Revolution. The term “social movement”
gained currency in European languages in the early 19th century. This was
a period of social upheaval.
8 Social Movements
Social Movement Unit 1
According to Anderson and Parker, social movement is “a form of

dynamic pluralistic behaviour which progressively develops structure
through time and aims at partial or complete modification of the social
order.”
Lundberg and others defined social movement as “a voluntary

association of people engaged in concerted efforts to change attitudes,
behaviour and social relationships in a larger society.”
Charles Tilly defined social movements as a series of contentious

performances, displays and campaigns by which ordinary people make
collective claims on others. For Tilly, social movements are a major vehicle
for ordinary people’s participation in public politics.
Sidney Tarrow defines a social movement as collective challenges

(to elites, authorities, other groups or cultural codes) by people with common
purposes and solidarity in sustained interactions with elites, opponents and
authorities. He specifically distinguishes social movements from political
parties and advocacy groups.
Social movements are not eternal. They have a life cycle: they are
created, they grow, they achieve successes or failures and, eventually,
they dissolve and cease to exist.
Social Movements are “organized efforts to promote or resist change

in society that rely, at least in part, on non-institutionalized forms of political
action” (Marx and McAdam, 1994)
De la Porta & Diani in Social Movements: An Introduction, referred

some characteristics of social movements as they are “involved in conflictual
relations with clearly identified opponents, are linked by dense informal
networks; (and they) share a distinct collective identity.
Turner and Killian (1972) defines social movement as some

continuous and group behaviour to uphold or defy certain change in his/
her society or group. It is initiated, organized and sustained collective action
marked by definite ideology and oriented towards social change.
Social Movements 9
CHECK YOUR PROGRESS
Q.1: State the meaning of social movement?

..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
Q.2: Social movement is ............................ action. (Fill in the blank).
Q.3: Karl Marx's view of social movements tends to nullify capitalism
and it believes in revolutionary changes to set up a conducive
environment for labours, farmers and socially weaker classes. (Write
True or False).
..................................................................................................................
Q.4: Write a few definitions of social movement? (Within 50 words)
..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
1.4 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF SOCIAL

MOVEMENTS
The roots of first documented social movements can be traced back

in the late 18th Century French Revolution and Polish Constitution of May
3rd 1791. Again, the late 19th Century labour movements and socialist
movements are the classical examples of social movements that led to the
formation of communist and social democratic parties and organizations.
Considering the matters of political representation, market

capitalization and proletarianization in the mid-18th century, the early Social
Movements in England were developed. John Wilkes was the figure behind
the first mass social movement. A person from the paper house, he attacked
the new administration and the peace terms by the Government were
accepted at the 1763 Treaty of Paris at the end of the Seven Years’ War.
Consequently, he was suppressed but that led to the growing movement
for popular sovereignty among the middle class people who began chanting
“Wilkes and Liberty” in the streets. Later, an activist group called the Society
for the Supporters of the Bill of Rights began aggressively promoting his
10 Social Movements
policies. This was the first ever sustained social movement involving public
meetings, demonstrations, the distribution of pamphlets on an
unprecedented scale and the mass petition march. Later, Wilkes was
returned to the Parliament and general warrants were declared as
unconstitutional and press freedom was extended to the coverage of
Parliamentary debates.
A much larger movement of anti-Catholic protest was triggered by

the Papists Act 1778, which eliminated a number of the penalties and
disabilities endured by the Roman Catholics in England. In 1780, after a
meeting of the Protestant Association, it’s members subsequently marched
on the House of Commons to deliver a petition demanding the repeal of
the Act, which the government refused to do. It resulted in large riots across
London and embassies and Catholic owned businesses were attacked by
angry mobs.
Other political movements that emerged in the late 18th century

included the British abolitionist movement against slavery (one being the
sugar boycott of 1791 and the other the great petition drive of 1806), and
possibly the upheaval surrounding the French and American Revolutions.
From 1815, Britain after its victory in the Napoleonic Wars entered
into the period of mature social movements. Chartism was the first mass
movement of the growing working class people in the world. It campaigned
for political reform between 1838 and 1848 with the people’s charter of
1838 as its manifesto which called for Universal Suffrage and the
implementation of the secret ballot, amongst other things. The term “social
movements” was introduced in 1848 by the German sociologist Lorenz
Von Stein in his book “Socialist Communist Movements since the Third
French Revolution” (1848) in which he introduced the term “social
movement” into scholarly discussions-actually depicting in this way political
movements fighting for the social rights understood as welfare rights.
The labour movement and socialist movement of the late 19th century
are seen as the prototypical social movements, leading to the formation of
communist and social democratic parties and organizations. These
Social Movements 11
tendencies were seen in poorer countries as the pressure for reform

continued, for example, Russia with the Russian Revolution of 1905 and of
1917, resulting in the collapse of the Czarist regime around the end of the
First World War.
In 1945, Britain following its victory in the Second World War entered
a period of radical reform and change. In the post-war period, feminist
movements, gay rights movement, peace movements, civil rights
movements, anti-nuclear movements and environmental movements and
many more new domains in the field of social movements were developed.
They led to the formation of green parties and organizations, a new global
social movement, the anti-globalization movement etc.
Throughout the history of the United States, social movements have

been a staple in the maturation of the country. From middle class white
women’s desire to be included in the American political process in the 19th
century came the Women’s Suffrage movement. The insurgence of a
generation of African Americans who left they had inalienable rights that
deserved to be acknowledged by their government led to the 1960’s civil
rights movement.
As early as the American Revolution, the sophisticated mobilization

of the American people displayed the characteristics of a modern social
movement. For instance, Philadelphia women proposed to create a national
women’s organizational movement to raise money for the troops and
renounced the use of British tea and fabric. The women helped to ignite
one of the earliest nonprofit organizations in the history of the nation, the
Daughters of Liberty (which continues till today). The women organized
mass spinning bees for wartime clothing, conducted national boycotts and
some women even disguised themselves as men and fought in the army.
Like the other parts of the world, the Indian origin of social
movements can be traced back to 7th and 5th Centuries BC. It was the
period of two socio-religious movements developed; when the Kshatriyas
reacted against the Brahmanical domination and Baishyas were trying to
improve their economic conditions along with the increase of trade.
12 Social Movements
Besides, Bhakti movement was another significant socio-religious

movement to protect Hinduism, originated in South India during the 7th to
8th century. It was spread northwards from Tamil Nadu through Karnataka
and gained wide acceptance in 15th Century in Bengal and Northern India.
At that time, the dominant Islamic rulers pushed general public to religious
conversion from Hinduism to Islam. In the 19th century, India witnessed
reform movements to end evils of society and religion. These are under
the banner of Brahma Samaj, Arya Samaj and some other reformatory
organizations.
Again, in pre-colonial and post-colonial period; India witnessed

peasant’s movements, Dalits movements, backward-caste movements,
tribal movements, students’ movements, women’s movements,
environmental movements and some other new social movements
representing the issues and prospects of Indian socio-political, religious
and economic lives.
1.5 FEATURES OF SOCIAL MOVEMENTS
Social movements are primarily marked by the following

characteristics
l Most of the social movements are carried on the basis of informal

networks of interactions among the people having common beliefs
and solidarity. They are mobilized around contentious themes and
frequently use various forms of protest.
l Social Movements develops via cycles of activities. Only through

protest one cannot affirm the existence of a movement. Because
various movements have diverse strategies, tactics and work-plans.
l Certain social movements propagate definite vision and some others

strive for the rights and liberties of people.
l It is an organized collective act with common objective, philosophy

and organizational leadership.
l They may opt for change or oppose it. But the intensity and coverage
of the change they demand, may vary.
Social Movements 13
l Sometimes, they challenge or defend existing institutional models or

diverse fields of authority.
l They are collective enterprises and display at least some degrees of

continuity over time with at least some degrees of organization.
l Certain social movements reflect people's dissatisfaction and are

much concerned about their matter. They often use 'Propaganda'-to
draw attention from the masses and from different sectors.
l Certain social movements are able to highly influence public opinion

and motivate the masses in a large scale.
l Social Movements can be of Resistance type, Reform type,

Revolutionary type, Expressive type etc. Resistance types refuse to
accept the changes occurred in the system. Reform types demand
reforms in the societal structure and system. Revolutionary types
believe in radical changes via revolution. Expressive types are
concentrating on improving the quality of life of their members for
better changes.
l The goals of Social Movements are like equitable distribution of

material resources, demanding full citizenship rights, re-formation of
values, priorities and norms of a society.
l In most of the social movements, the general mob exercise power by

withholding their consent on the matters like refusing to participate in
everyday life, denying others their labour, refusing to work to force
employer, civil disobedience, marches, parades, rallies, purposefully
and openly violating the law, street protests etc.
l Social movements push the allied community to capitalize socio-

political and economic opportunities and transform them into social
change. Social movements allow people to come together and speak
commonly about their basic issues. Movements are often taken as
tools to upgrade the level of intellectual thinking and logical reasoning
by the educated sections and they generalized the summary of the
movement amongst the poor and illiterates and accordingly mobilize
the whole society for the common cost. Thus, movements bring
14 Social Movements
greater social bonding and unity irrespective of diversities among

social groups as and when the issues carried on by the leaders of
the movement are common for all of them.
l Social movements are seen as instruments for greater social

improvement, awareness building mechanism for greater cohesion
and social articulation. They are collective steps for bringing social
adjustment, change and mobilization.
Thus, a social movement is a network of informal interactions between

a plurality of individuals, groups or organizations, engaged in a political or
cultural conflict, on the basis of a shared collective identity (Diani, 1992:13).
CHECK YOUR PROGRESS
Q.5: The members of social movement share

common objectives. (Write True or False)
..................................................................................................................
Q.6: Identify the first documented social movement.
..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
Q.7: Name the author of the book "Socialist Communist Movements
since the Third French Revolution."
..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
Q.8: Identify two features of social movements.
..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
1.6 IMPORTANCE OF SOCIAL MOVEMENTS
The effectiveness or significance of social movements can be

identified on the following points:
l Social movements can enlighten their members through developing

awareness, improving their level of education, suggesting effective
policy measures, mobilizing, organizing and formalizing collective
Social Movements 15
action and developing non-state civil society groups or actors etc.
l Social movements mostly benefit the weaker, unrepresented,

marginalized groups. Their voice and problems are often highlighted
in the platform of social movements.
l It helps the members of social movements to critically assess the

social reality and offer solutions for their problems.
l It generates collective identity to unstructured masses.
l It tends to satisfy shared interests of the group and enhance support

to their actions in a structured manner.
l It tries to establish a new order of life after a prolonged struggle and

helps people to get benefits from the existing political situations or
demands for social change.
l Actually, social movements raise their questions against the available

inappropriate socio-political policies and structures.
l Most of the social movements are demanding greater changes against

the social problems like Anti-Poverty Movement, Anti-Arrack Movement,
Labour Movement, Environmental protection movement, etc.
From the above discussions, it is clear that the different social

movements have different connotations and length. So, their implications
are also diverse and manifold.
CHECK YOUR PROGRESS
Q.9: Different social movements have different

connotations and length. So, their implications are
also diverse and manifold. (Write True or False).
..................................................................................................................
Q.10: Social movements are associated with voice against social
.................................. (Fill in the Blank)
Q.11: Examine the significance of social movement. (Within 50 words)
..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
16 Social Movements
1.7 LET US SUM UP
l Social Movements are collective action of the people against an

established social order and policies. It collectively acts for bringing
changes in the socio-political structure.
l The term “social movements” was introduced in 1848 by the German
Sociologist Lorenz von Stein in his book Socialist and Communist
Movements since the Third French Revolution (1848).
l Social movements are not eternal. They have a life cycle: they are
created, they grow, they achieve successes or failures and, eventually,
they dissolve and cease to exist.
l Roots of the first documented social movements can be traced back
in the late 18th Century French Revolution and the Polish Constitution
of May 3rd 1791.
l Considering the matters of political representation, market capitalization
and proletarianization, the mid-18th century early social movements in
England were developed. John Wilkes was the figure behind the first
mass social movement.
l From 1815, Britain following its victory in the Napoleonic Wars entered
into the period of mature social movements.
l Social movements develops via cycles of activities. Only through protest
we cannot affirm the existence of a movement. Because various
movements have diverse strategies, tactics and work-plans.
l Certain social movements propagate definite vision and some others
strive for the rights and liberties of people.
l It is an organized collective act with common objective, philosophy
and organizational leadership.
l Social movements can enlighten their members through developing
awareness, improving their level of education, suggesting effective
policy measures, mobilizing, organizing and formalizing collective
action and developing non-state civil society groups or actors etc.
Social Movements 17
Ans to Q No 4: Anderson and Parker defined social movement as a

"form of dynamic pluralistic behaviour which progressively
develops structure through time and aims at a partial or complete
modification of the social order".
Lundberg and others define social movement as "a voluntary
association of people engaged in concerted efforts to change
attitudes, behaviour and social relationships in a larger society.
For, Charles Tilly, social movements are a major vehicle for
ordinary people's participation in public politics.
Ans to Q No 5: True.
Ans to Q No 6: The roots of first documented social movements can
be traced back in the late 18th Century French Revolution and
Polish Constitution of May 3rd 1791.
Ans to Q No 7: Lorenz von Stein.
Ans to Q No 8: Social Movements develop via cycles of activities. Only
through protest one cannot affirm the existence of a movement
because various movements have diverse strategies, tactics and
work-plans. Certain social movements propagate definite vision
and some others strive for the rights and liberties of people. It is
an organized collective act with a common objective, philosophy
and organizational leadership. They may opt for change or
oppose it. But the intensity and coverage of the change they
demand; may vary. Sometimes, they challenge or defend the
existing institutional models or diverse fields of authority.
Ans to Q No 10: Problems.
Ans to Q No 11: A social movement mostly benefits the weaker,
unrepresented, marginalized groups. Their voice and problems
are often highlighted in the platform of a social movement. It
helps the members of social movement to critically assess the
social reality and offer solutions for their problems. It generates
collective identity for the unstructured masses. It tends to satisfy
the shared interests of the group and enhance support to their
actions in a structured manner.
Social Movements 19
1.10 POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
A) Very Short Questions

Q. 1 : What do you mean by social movement?
Q. 2 : Mention one inevitable characteristic of social movement.
Q. 3 : Social movements are combination of both structured and
unstructured population. (Mark true or false).
B) Short Questions (Answer each question in about 150 words)
Q. 1 : Examine the different types of social movements.
Q. 2 : Discuss the historical background behind the development of social
movements.
Q. 3 : Mention the different views regarding the meaning and concept of
social movement.
C) Long Questions (answer each question in about 300-500 words)
Q. 1 : Assess the significance of social movements.
Q. 2 : Comprehensively discuss the features of social movements.
*** ***** ***
20 Social Movements
UNIT 2: TYPES OF SOCIAL MOVEMENTS
UNIT STRUCTURE

2.2 Introduction
2.3 Various Phases and Types of Social Movements
2.4 Determinants of Social Movements: Different Approaches to
Social Movements
2.5 Causes of Social Movements and Their Outcomes
2.6 Let Us Sum Up
2.7 Further Reading

l understand various phases and types of Social Movements
l explain the determinants of Social Movements
l describe different approaches to Social Movements
l discuss the causes of Social Movements and their outcomes.
2.2 INTRODUCTION
Social Movements are the common and shared objectives of

dissatisfied people against the socio-political authority to bring changes
for collective betterment. There are different manifestations of social
movements. Different sections of people with varied objectives, ideological
connotations such as revolution, reformation, resistance in different phases
develops different social movements. The unit thus, aims to discuss different
types and phases of social movements. Again, the determinants of social
movements like personal causes, relative deprivation and others shall also
be discussed in the unit. The different approaches to study social
movements, causes and outcomes of social movements shall also be
included in the unit. Considering all these matters, the chapter tends to
Social Movements 21
Unit 2 Types of Social Movements
develop a comprehensive deliberation on various stages, types,

determinants, causes and outcomes of social movements.
2.3 VARIOUS PHASES AND TYPES OF SOCIAL

MOVEMENTS
Phases of social movements can be distinctly explained by

understanding the life cycle of the movement. It contains the starting, growth
and results of the movement. Different movements occur in different societies
marked by the way of rule, social needs and demands. Rise of demands like
individual and social rights, freedom of expression, and civil disobedience of
19th century offered the seeds for the growth of a number of social movements
throughout the world. Again the people engaged in different social movements
are of different agenda and viewpoints. In ancient times, differences in poverty
and wealth are factors and in modern times, it is the varied customs, ethics
and values. Thus, the origin of social movements are marked by certain
initiating event; that may be individual and specific but that usually followed
chain reaction from the concerned society and develop the movement. Such
as Mahatma Gandhi was thrown out of train in South Africa as he was a
black and that was an event that triggered movement against Apartheid in
South Africa. Hence, social movements are normally created when a large
number of people realized that there are others sharing the same values.
Accordingly they aspire for social change and indulge in movement.
Social movements are in difficult situations in the succeeding stage,

when they have to show existence and acquire mass support. In this regard,
they are often headed by charismatic leaders and they increase mass
popularity. Besides, outside elements like- government, civil society groups
etc. are generally significant in creating awareness and solidarity among
people. Despite having all these issues, many a times, movements faced
the crisis of failure or defunct.
Stages of social movements include the study on the life cycle of social
movements starting from its inception, its growth and maturity and finally
results. Blumer (1969) and Tilly (1978) outline a four-stage process. In the
22 Social Movements
Types of Social Movements Unit 2
initial stage, people develop awareness about a matter and choose a leader
to run the masses. This is followed by the second stage of developing
membership of the movement, its publicity and increasing awareness. In
the third stage, the movement becomes institutionalized and already upgraded
to a well-established organization. At the fourth stage of the movement, people
may fall away and adopt a new movement or may bring another turn to the
movement, sometimes the movement may decline at this stage.
Social movements are of different types marked by their objectives,

ways of protest, expansion and scope. The sociologist David Aberle (1966),
distinguished the social movements based on what they want to change
and how much change they want. Besides, social movements can be seen
in local, national and global level, considering the peripheral span of the
movement. Movements can again be classified into revolutionary type,
religious/redemptive type, alternative type, resistance type etc. Revolutionary
movements seek to completely change every aspect of the society. Religious
or Redemptive movements are attempting to change the inner spiritual
feelings of the individuals. Alternative movements are focused on self-
improvement and limited, specific changes to individual beliefs and behaviour.
Resistance movements seek to prevent or undo change to the social structure.
Another type may be the reactionary movements and they try to block social
change or to reverse social changes that have already been achieved.
Besides, we have seen the self-help movements; where people try to improve
various aspects of their personal lives.
Apart from the aspects discussed above, the types of social

movements can be classified into the following lines:
1. Reform movements are organized to carry out reforms in some

specific areas. Such as Civil rights movement, Women's liberation
movement, Arya Samaj movement and Brahmo Samaj movement
(in Indian context) etc. Here, the participants of the movement attempt
to generate better arrangements for the society as a whole.
2. Revolutionary movements deny the system and are deeply dissatisfied

with the social order and work for radical change. They advocate for
Social Movements 23
replacing the whole existing structure. They try to re-arrange the

society as per their vision. Usually, they resort to violence, such as
the Protestant Reformation Movement, the Socialist Movement, and
the Communist Revolution of China.
3. Resistance movements are arranged to develop voices against the
changes taking place in the society and culture and they are against
the views of the protesters.
4. Utopian movements attempt to take the society or a section of it
towards a state of perfection, and for that, it sometimes support radical
changes. The means and ends of such movements are often abstract
and have less specific programmes to attain them. The movement
for establishing Ram Rajya in India or the establishment of stateless,
classless society by the Communists are the best examples here.
5. The peasant movement can be historically traced back to the colonial
movement in Indian context, when repressive economic policies, the
new land revenue system, the colonial administrative and judicial system
harshly affected the economic life of the peasants. In the feudal system
too, the farmers were suppressed economically, socially as well as
culturally by the landlords. At the unbearable stage, they resisted the
system which gave birth to a situation of unrest, uprising and violence.
Some important peasant uprising are---Sanyasi rebellion (1770),
Wahabi rebellion(1831), Santal rebellion (1855), Indigo revolt (1859),
Champaran Satyagrah (1917-18), Naxalbari Movement (1957) etc.
6. The women's movement in India has been a rich and vibrant movement
which has taken different forms in different parts of the country since
the time of India's freedom struggle. Since 1848, voice for the rights of
women along with men appears in the western countries. Later, different
stages and slogans have appeared in different stages. Personal rights,
political rights, reproductive rights, demands for equal pay, group rights
have been some of the demands by women in different phases.
7. The Backward Caste movements started to make secure the social,
economic, political and religious conditions of the underprivileged.
They were subjected to extreme form of exploitation in the caste
24 Social Movements
system. The colonial rule further developed differences in economic

lines. The atrocities united the lower castes against the upper castes.
E.V. Ramaswamy, started Self-Respect Movement against the
Brahmins in South India. Subsequently, after the Independence,
Backward Class Commission was set up to look into the conditions
and requirements of these classes. Mandal Commission submitted
its report in 1980 recommending reservations for the backward castes
in the educational institutions and government offices. These are some
of the significant examples of backward caste movements.
8. The Dalit Movements started as part of the demands of the

suppressed people in the Caste-based hierarchy. Their ascriptive
status pushes them back to vulnerability in the hands of the upper-
caste people. The organizational efforts made by the Dalit leadership
for uplifting their status are known as the Dalit movement. It is a
protest against issues related to untouchability, casteism, and
discrimination faced by the Dalits. Mahatma Gandhi, in 1923, founded
the All India Harijan Sevak Sangh to start education and schools for
the Dalits. Another most important Dalit leader, Dr. Bhim Rao Ramji
Ambedkar struggled to secure the basic human dignity for the Dalits.
The Mahad Satyagrah for the right of water led by him was one of the
outstanding movements of the dalits to win equal social rights. The
role of the All India Depressed Classes Association and All India
depressed Classed Federation were the Principal organizations which
initiated a movement to improve the conditions of the dalits. They
worked to secure the rights of the Dalits, spread education and ensure
their empowerment, their social and economic security etc.
CHECK YOUR PROGRESS
Q.1: Name one Sociologist who distinguished

among the social movements based on what they
want to change and how much change they want.
..................................................................................................................
Social Movements 25
Q.2: Social movement can be seen in --------, ----------and -------- level

considering the peripheral span of the movement. (Fill in the blanks)
Q.3: Stages of social movements include the study on the life cycle
of social movements. (Write True or False)
..................................................................................................................
Q.4: Examine the various types of social movement? (Within 50
words)
..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
2.4 DETERMINANTS OF SOCIAL MOVEMENTS:

DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO SOCIAL
MOVEMENTS
The different types of social movements discussed above, emerge

due to a number of issues such as- the idea of reformation, resistance,
oppression, dissatisfaction, demands for rights and socio-economic upliftment
etc. Besides, economic and political reasons, technology and development,
population and problems, environmental factors and international issues,
social and racial inequality etc. can also be defined as the determinants of
social movements, which by and large motivate the people to fight for their
growing concerns and needs. Lower economic growth, non-democratic
political regimes are often the causes of social movements. Again, we may
identify a list of the determinants of social movements marked by individual
and psychological factors, ideological dimensions etc. and these can be
studied through different approaches. Relative deprivation and resource
mobilization are two most significant conceptual understanding to examine
the determinants of social movements which are discussed below:
Individual factors can be identified with the help of certain psychological

prospects that either led a person to actively participate in the movement or
to help him to develop disapproval against the same. Alienation, feelings of
powerlessness, hopelessness, and separation from society may influence
an individual to participate in the movements. Deprivation, discontent and
frustration are frequently assumed to be the common causes for initiating or
26 Social Movements
joining a social movement. An individual’s feeling of deprivation may surround

the whole group of society, i.e. relative deprivation may be a social determinant
of social movement. However, the relative deprivation approach seeks to
explain that the persons who are feeling themselves in most terrible situations
develop a feeling of relative deprivation, and usually play a significant role in
social movements. These issues are discussed below.
Relative deprivation approach refers to a situation when the social,

economic and political situations fail to satisfy the masses and generate
frustration, then they opt for changes. This kind of negative feeling brings
people towards the situation of difference between peoples’ wants and
actualities. They may not be deprived in reality but they feel deprived by
comparing with other privileged sections, which we call reference group.
For example, a middle class family may feel relatively deprived when they
compare their house to that of their upper-class professional family.
Accordingly, the members feel that they deserve more rights, wealth, power,
status and many more. Gradually, their frustration reach an upper limit and
they loose their faith in the conventional methods and structures. Therefore,
to attain their aim, the group will organize into a social movement and they
believe that their collective action shall only bring success.
Resource mobilization is another approach to study how the social
movements mobilize their organizational outlet, mass media, person, money
and material etc. Effectiveness and failure of the movement are related to
all the said resources and their fruitful uses. Here, the leadership of the
movement takes the utmost responsibility to mobilize all these aspects.
In addition to it, a number of social movement theories under the
classical and modern approaches are to be studied in order to understand
the factors and issues leading to social movements.
Commonly, the classical approach believes in some casual

mechanism that emerged at the turn of the century. It believes that the
sources of social movements are structural constrains. The structural flaws
of the society put the individuals under certain psychological repression,
such as unemployment, rapid industrialization, urbanization and most of
them are subjective in nature. When that psychological disturbance attains
Social Movements 27
the border line, it ultimately drives the people to movements as they deny
the conventional means. These approaches further believe that peoples’
participation in the movements is mostly irrational, motivational and emotional.
Hardly, the masses follow the protocols and reasoning. These kinds of
psychologically driven approaches are rejected by the contemporary
sociologists and political scientists, though many scholars still gave their
thrust on emotions. The work of Gustav LeBon, Herbert Blumer, William
Kornhauser and Neil Smelser etc. are important in this field. Gustave
LeBon, in his book “The Crowd” (1895), studied the collective behaviour of
crowds and developed the conclusion that once an individual submerges in
a crowd, his behaviour becomes primitive and irrational and he is therefore
capable of spontaneous behaviour. This is the collective behaviour theory
and further developed by theorists like Herbert Blumer and Neil Smelser.
Again, in the 1930’s and 1940’s, the Mass society theory emerged in
the wake of fascist and communist movements. It tries to explore the rise
of extremism abroad. The theory develops the fact that the socially isolated
people are more vulnerable to extremism. On this theoretical ground, Emile
Durkheim developed the analysis of modern society and rise of
individualism. Durkheim argued that the emergence of the industrial society
caused two problems: anomie and egoism. According to Durkheim, these
problems signify the failure of the social network to control an individual’s
behaviour. According to Durkheim, this will lead to dysfunctional behaviour,
such as suicide.
William Kornhauser applied this theory to social movements in his book
The Politics of Mass Society (2008). He pointed out that modern democratic
systems possess a distinct vulnerability to mass movements. He spells out
and identifies the factors that tend to increase or decrease this vulnerability—
not least the health and strength of elites. In this way, the book reveals new
clues to the origin and nature of mass political movements.
Again, the classical approaches cover up two senses of relative

deprivation or feeling of inequality, particularly in relation to others or in
relation to the peoples’ own expectations. In the first view, people see others
having more socio-political and cultural power, economic strength, and
28 Social Movements
accordingly, attempts to acquire all those for themselves too. In the second
view, people are more prone to movements and whenever a situation arises
to improve their existing situation or stops improving, at that juncture, they
will join movements to materialize their expectations. Here, we can discuss
the works of James Davies, Ted Gurr and Denton Morrison.
Since 1960’s, both Europe and the United States witnessed serious
growth in the amount of social movement activities. Accordingly, the
common perception against social movements also changed. People
began to pursue greater demands for healthy democracy and essential
policies to attain the goal of greater political participation. Though the
classical approaches considered the structural issues to examine the
growth of movements, growth also carried forward common welfare, which
was hardly ignored. To consider this second thought, a contemporary
theoretical approach has developed. The more American-centered
structural approaches examined other factors like gender, ethnicity or
sexuality as central to class struggle.
The Structural approaches often consider the political process as an

opportunities that are significant in the field of social movement activity.
Certain political situations stimulate the movement activities. Political
opportunities such as growing political decision making powers, instability
or conflict between the ruling elites, access to elite allies, decline of sate’s
capacity to repress dissent, etc. may be realized through political
concessions, social movement participation, or social movement
organizational founding.
One of the first needs to produce a social movement is organization.
Duty of the organization is to acquire and deploy resources to attain their
concerned objectives. When the participants of a social movement are
highly organized, they are more likely to create organized forms of protests.
They are quite efficient to mobilize and use the resources for their common
goals. Such resources may be of material, moral, socio-organizational,
human and cultural kind. Some versions of this theory state that movements
operate similar to capitalist enterprises that make efficient use of the
available resources.
Social Movements 29
Social Movement Impact theory deals with the individual, institutional,

cultural and socio-political impacts of a social movement on the society.
Methodologically, the theory often focused more on the worth of violent or
non-violent modes, importance of political allies and elites, agencies running
popular movements etc.
Social-constructivist approaches which emerged in Europe admit that
the present movements are different from the past as because instead of
engaging in the issue of labourers, class conflicts they deal more with civil
rights, feminist issues, environmental causes, anti-warfare demands etc.
Participants’ causes are more socio-political today and this kind of motivation
formulates the post-colonial politics, particularly, those created the new
middle class. This scholastic school also influenced the prominent American
scholars like Charles Tilly. In this regard, we will also look at the works of
Ronald Inglehart, Jurgen Habermas, Alberto Melucci, Steve Buechler etc.
The 1990’s social-movement studies developed the significance of
cultures, emotions other than structural factors to analyse the pros and
cons of social movements. Alberto Melucci’s Challenging Codes (1996)
and James M Jasper’s The Art of Moral Protest (1997) are prominent works
in this regard. Melucci focused on the creation of collective identities as the
purpose of social movements, especially “the new social movements”,
whereas Jasper argued that movements provide participants with a chance
to elaborate and articulate their moral intuitions and principles.
Broadly, the approaches of social movements follow either Marxist
or non-Marxist framework for analysis. Again, Gandhian approach is another
powerful approach to discuss social movements.
l Marxian Approach
It believes in revolutionary social change. It believes that class based
social structure developed faulty economic structure. Here, bourgeoisie class
is opposite to the labour class in terms of privileges and wealth. Bourgeoisie
class used the institutions of state and society and their coercive means to
control and exploit the labour class. With the development of this kind of
capitalist structure, the labours unite themselves and launched planned
protests against their capitalist authority and aim to bring radical socio-political
change by removing them from the positions of power.
30 Social Movements
Thus, the adherents of Marxian approach emphasizes only on

conflicting economic interests as vital to social movements. But, a group of
them also admits that factors like ethnic, political, religious, cultural etc. are
other significant issues behind social movements. Marxist school of thought
however, developed that the members of movement have common
consciousness regarding their socio-economic position and that ultimately
lead them to organize social movement to fight for their cause. The subaltern
school, on the other hand criticized the traditional Marxists for their negligence
in history of the masses because they believe that history not always
dependent on the powerful class. Again, the traditional Marxists school
criticized subaltern theory on the ground of ignoring the structural factors
and considers consciousness as independent of structural contradictions.
l Liberal Approach
There is no unanimity among the other non-Marxian schools of social

movements. They have different views regarding the issues like need of
social and political change, role of social movements etc. Liberal scholars
like William Kornhauser, Robert Nisbet, Edward Shils etc. developed the
opinion that mass societies produce mass movements having extremist
and anti-democratic elements. These scholars advocate the exclusion of
the masses from day-to-day involvement in politics, as it hampers the
efficiency of the government.
l Gandhian Approach
Mahatma Gandhi adhered to non-violent means to end the British

rule in India and launched a prolonged freedom movement. But he
disapproved the frequent launching of mass agitations as he believed that
it was dangerous and dysfunctional for civilized society.
Some people disapprove revolutionary change in the socio-political

and economic structures. However, they are not against any political
change to reform government and political institutions. Some people
approve a revolutionary change. However, their analysis of class is
different from that of Marxist scholars. They put thrust on political
institutions and culture.
Social Movements 31
All the above discussion helps us to understand the approaches to

social movements. It is important to develop that while classical approaches
put more stress on structural weaknesses, the contemporary approaches
are more prone to cultural identities, environmental and socio-political issues.
CHECK YOUR PROGRESS
Q.5: The idea of reformation, resistance,

oppression, dissatisfaction, demands for rights and
socio-economic upliftment etc. are certain issues
generating social movements. (Write True or False).
..................................................................................................................
Q.6: What do you mean by relative deprivation?
..................................................................................................................
Q.7: Name the author of the book "The Crowd" (1895).
..................................................................................................................
Q.8: Identify two conceptual approaches of social movements.
..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
2.5 CAUSES OF SOCIAL MOVEMENTS AND THEIR

OUTCOMES
The causes of social movements are significant in the context of

bringing socio-economic reforms, developments, resistance and many
more. Social unrest, discomfort, dissatisfaction, descent, need for better
socio-economic rights and security are certain matters that bring forth social
movements to the limelight. Some of those are discussed in the following:
1. A group of social scientists believes that social movements do not

occur in vacuum. It is social unrest which gives rise to a social
movement. The unrest may be caused by factors such as- cultural
drift. In course of cultural drift, people change their existing values and
ideas and develop new ideas. In order to operationalise those ideas,
people organize social movements. The development of a democratic
society, the emancipation of women, the spread of mass education,
32 Social Movements
the removal of untouchability, equality of opportunity for both the sexes,

growth of secularism are the examples of such movements.
2. Sometimes uneven social developments lead to social
disorganization. It generally happens when one part/region of a
country change more rapidly and other parts are lagging behind.
Industrialization, urbanization are some of the reasons behind the
same. Such reasons cause social discomfort or disorganization and
stimulate the formulation of social movements.
3. In the transitory period between old traditional values shifting towards
the new modern updates, individuals become rootless. They are in
confusion and uncertainly and their feel alienated from the society.
The individuals feel insecure, confused and frustrated. These
conditions produce social movements.
4. The feelings of social injustice lead the people towards frustration
and alienation. Any group, at any status level, may feel that they are
the victim of social injustice. High taxation, protective discrimination
etc. are the examples that create the feelings of social injustice among
different sections. The feelings of injustice may not occur only among
the poor sections and marginalized but among the rich sections too.
Social injustice is a subjective value judgment. A social system is
unjust when it is so perceived by its members and such feelings may
lead to frustration and ultimately social movements to serve their
needs. Thus, it is significant to remember that in a stable, well
integrated society, there are fewer chances of tensions and social
movements are usually rare in such systems. The complex modern
society is more troubled by social movements as the people have
more distress and tensions in comparison to the traditional societies.
5. Some groups of people are more prone to social movements. They
may be alienated or the socially disintegrated groups, marginal groups,
groups isolated from the family, community, groups which face socio-
economic insecurity, groups which are maladjusted etc. They usually
resort more to social movements to satisfy their issues. Thus, the
homeless people or who misfit in the society become the supporters
Social Movements 33
of mass movement. It may also be noted that some people join the
social movements for reasons unrelated to the movements' objectives.
Some of them are like flying bees and others may join movements
for attaining the power or satisfaction of one's own interest rather
than to promote the goals of the movement. It may again be focused
that, the small scale social movements having less foundational
strength mainly face this kind of problems.
However, it is significant to note that each full grown social movement

develops a chain of processes from unrest to excitement, excitement to
formalization and from formation to institutionalization. Relative deprivation,
emotional and cultural identity crisis, need for reforms, resistance etc. are
the causes behind its occurrence and growth.
l The outcomes of social movements
As the social movements are collective attempts to change, restructure

and resist the social order and change, we cannot conclude its outcome
analysis only on the lines of its success and failure. Failure of social
movements may take place due to the aspects like a participants' declining
trust on the leadership of the movement, suppression of the movement,
disintegration among the leadership of the movement, organizational failure
etc. Again, success is vital when the movement enables to grasp
spontaneous and active participation from a strong voiced group for a longer
period. When the movement is run by a legitimized authority and if
successfully manages power relation amongst its members, then there
are very less chance of diversion and failure. Sometimes, the movement
becomes institutionalized and later on it enables to attain or influence the
political system at a large scale. For example, the struggle for Independence
of India led by the Indian National Congress during the British rule enabled
them to hold political power after the Independence. But, this kind of grand
success of social movements only occur when mass participation and faith
on leadership is very strong.
In addition to it, the social movement impact theory also known as

the outcome theory focuses on examining the impacts of the social
34 Social Movements
movements on society, as well as on its different levels. Again, it studies

the factors leading to those effects. The outcomes of social movements
can be again analysed in terms of the following ways:
1. The individuals' psychological and emotional issues are mostly

affected by the aspects of social movements. The participants actively
join in the movement, share the values, ideas as well as burdens.
They foster further activism collectively that develops their
psychological attachment among themselves.
2. At the Institutional level, social movements targeted the non-state

institutions. Some social movements are centered around the
workplace of the labourers such as labour movements or co-operative
movements. Rapid growth in terms of money and members of one
institution, diffuseness or decentralization of organization, strength
of links between clients and professionals and ties with the state etc.
are certain institution specific characters that are more likely to get
involved in movements.
3. Culture in the form of art, literature, writings etc. is mostly used by

the participants of a movement to popularize their ideological
framework and to attain more and more support. It is constantly used
to generate more awareness amongst the participants.
4. Political changes are also achieved through the movements.

Successful social movements are often been able to influence,
reframe political issues and policies in order to attain their movement
objectives.
Besides, we have witnessed social movements both at the individual

and societal level attempting to secure bigger or smaller changes. While
the reformative movements result in social upliftment, upgradation of
available socio-political and economic structure to secure better life
standard, revolutionary movements are aimed to bring radical changes
which deny the state system. Similarly, alternative movements seek certain
changes in the individual and social behaviour and redemptive movements
brings changes in the socio-religious nature.
Social Movements 35
Since the mid-1970's, however, scholars have put immense interest

in studying the ways regarding how the social movements generate changes
at different levels. Political, biographical and cultural outcomes are more
prominent in this regard. Here, political outcomes bring changes in the
political environment of the movement, biographical outcomes consider
the changes brought in the life course of the participants of the movement
and cultural outcomes alter their broad cultural environment in the form of
history, Art, literature etc.
CHECK YOUR PROGRESS
Q.9: The causes of social movements are

significant in the field of bringing socio-economic
reforms, developments, resistance and many
more. (Write True or False).
..................................................................................................................
Q.10: Social unrest may be caused by factors like cultural
………………... (Fill in the Blank).
Q.11: Examine the main causes behind the occurrence of social
movement. (Within 50 words)
..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
2.6 LET US SUM UP
l Social movements are of different types marked by its objectives, way

of protest, expansion and scope. Sociologist David Aberle (1966) made
a distinction among social movements based on what they want to
change and how much change they want.
l Movements can again be classified into revolutionary type, religious/
redemptive type, alternative type, resistance type etc.
l Stages of social movements include the study on the life cycle of social
movements. Generally, in the Indian context, movements are in the form
of reform movement, resistance movement, peasants' movements,
36 Social Movements
women's movement, dalit movement, backward caste movements etc.

l Issues such as the idea of reformation, resistance, oppression,
dissatisfaction, demands for rights and socio-economic upliftment etc.
are significant behind the emergence of social movements.
l We can identify a list of determinants of social movements marked by
individual and psychological factors, ideological dimensions etc. In
addition to it, a number of social movement theories under the classical
and modern approaches are to be talked about to understand the
factors and issues of social movements.
l The classical approaches that believe in some casual mechanism
emerged at the turn of the century. It believes that the sources of
social movements are structural constrains.
l Structural approaches consider the political process and opportunities
which are significant in the field of social movement activity. Certain
political situations stimulate the movement activities.
l It is important to develop that while classical approaches put more stress
on structural weaknesses, the contemporary approaches are more prone
to cultural identities, environmental and socio-political issues.
l Causes of social movements are significant in the field of bringing
socio-economic reforms, developments, resistance and many more.
Social unrest, discomfort, dissatisfaction, descent, opt for better socio-
economic rights and security are certain matters that bring forth social
movements in the limelight.
l Feeling of injustice, alienation, deprivation, cultural drift, social
disintegration, relative deprivation, emotional and cultural identity crisis,
needs to have reforms, resistance etc. are the causes behind the
occurrence and growth of social movements.
2.7 FURTHER READING
1) Blau, J. R. (Ed.). (2004). The Blackwell companion to Sociology. USA:

Blackwell.
2) Chesters, G. and Welsh, I. (2011). Social movements: The key
concepts. London: Routledge.
Social Movements 37
3) De la Porta and Diani (2006). Social movements: An introduction. USA:

Malden MA: Blackwell Published. 2nd Edition.
4) Giugni, M., Bosi, L. and Uba, K. (2013). Outcomes of social movements
and protest activities. In Oxford Bibliographies in “Political Science”.
DOI: 10.1093/OBO/9780199756223-0037
Web links/e-resources:
https://alagappauniversity.ac.in>...PDF
https://courses.lumenlearning.com/alamo-sociology-sociology/chapter/
reading-types-and-stages-of-social-movements/
https://www.sociologyguide.com/social-change/social-movements-
type.php
https://www.britannica.com/topic/social-movement/psychological-
factors
https://www.cliffsnotes.com/study-guides/sociology/social-change-and-
movements/social-movements
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_movement_theory
https://alagappauniversity.ac.in>...PDF
www.britannica.com/topic/social-movement/The-consequences-of-
social-movements
www.britannica.com/topic/social-movement/The-consequences-of-
social-movementshttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Social_movement_impact_theory
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_movement_impact_theory
https:// study.com/academy/lesson/social-movement-definitions-
alternative-redemptive revolutionary.html
Giugni, Marco, Bosi, Lorenzo and Uba, Katrin Outcomes of Social
Movements and Protest Activities. In Oxford Bibliographies in “Political
Science”, 2013. (DOI: 10.1093/OBO/9780199756223-0037
2.8 ANSWERS TO CHECK YOUR PROGRESS
Ans to Q No 1: Sociologist David Aberle (1966)

Ans to Q No 2: Local, national and global level
38 Social Movements
Ans to Q No 3: True
Ans to Q No 4: Movements can be classified into revolutionary type,
religious/redemptive type, alternative type, resistance type etc.
Revolutionary movements seek to completely change every
aspect of a society. Religious or Redemptive movements attempt
to change the inner spiritual feelings of individuals. Alternative
movements are focused on self-improvement and limited, specific
changes to individual beliefs and behaviour. Resistance
movements seek to prevent or undo change to the social
structure. Another type may be the reactionary movements and
they try to block social change or to reverse social changes that
have already been achieved. Besides, we have seen the self-
help movements; where people try to improve aspects of their
personal lives.
Ans to Q No 5: True
Ans to Q No 6: Relative deprivation refers to a situation when the people
feel themselves more deprived in terms of the opportunities and
privileges than others and in terms of one's own expectations.
Ans to Q No 7: Gustave LeBon, is the author of the book The Crowd.
(1895)
Ans to Q No 8: Relative deprivation and resource mobilization are two
significant conceptual formulations to explain social movements.
Relative deprivation is a kind of negative feeling that brings people
towards the situation of difference between people's wants and
actualities. Accordingly, the members feel that they deserve more
rights, wealth, power, status and many more. Gradually, their
frustration reached an upper limit and they lost their faith in
conventional means. Therefore, to attain their aim, the group
will organize into a social movement. Resource mobilization is
another approach to study how the social movements mobilize
their organizational outlet, mass media, person, money and
material etc. Effectiveness and failure of the movement is related
to all the said resources and their fruitful uses. Here, the
Social Movements 39
leadership of the movement takes the utmost responsibility to

mobilize all these aspects.
Ans to Q No 9: True
Ans to Q No 10: Cultural Drift
Ans to Q No 11: Causes of social movements are significant in the field
of bringing socio-economic reforms, developments, resistance
and many more. Social unrest, discomfort, dissatisfaction,
descent, hope for better socio-economic rights and security are
certain matters that bring forth social movements to the limelight.
The feeling of injustice, alienation, deprivation, cultural drift, social
disintegration, relative deprivation, emotional and cultural identity
crisis, need for reforms, resistance etc. are the causes behind
its occurrence and growth.

Q. 1 : What are the stages of social movements?
Q. 2 : Mention one significant determinant of social movement.
Q. 3 : Name one social movement theory that had emerged in the wake
of fascist and communist movements.
Q. 1 : Discuss the stages and types of social movements.
Q. 2 : Discuss the classical and contemporary approaches of social
movements.
Q. 3 : Mention different views about the classical approaches of social
movement.
C) Long Questions (answer each question in about 300-500 words)
Q. 1 : Assess the outcomes of social movements.
Q. 2 : Comprehensively discuss the causes of social movements.
*** ***** ***

40 Social Movements
UNIT 3: IDEOLOGY OF SOCIAL MOVEMENTS
UNIT STRUCTURE

3.2 Introduction
3.3 Ideology of Social Movements
3.3.1 Nature of Social Movements
3.3.2 Classifications of Social Movements
3.3.3 Theories of Social Movements
3.4 Distinguishing Social Movements from Social Institutions and
Social Associations
3.5 Organizational and Leadership Dynamics of Social Movement
3.6 Role of Leadership in Social Movements
3.7 Let Us Sum Up
3.8 Further Reading

l understand the concept of social movements
l discuss the differences between social movements and other
social institutions.
l explain the role of leadership in social movements.
3.2 INTRODUCTION
Social movements are an integral part of any democratic society

because not only they bring about a certain degree of state accountability,
but also provide 'space' to the individuals and groups to advance interests
which are beyond individual concerns. Social movements are more than
just protest movements, but they must be seen in a positive context wherein
Social Movements 41
Unit 3 Ideology of Social Movements
they contribute to the change and reforms of social and political institutions,
hence it will lead to a better future for all. Essentially, a social movement is
a form of collective action where people and communities seek to bring
about change in societal as well as political issues. The nature of social
movements has changed over the years and it plays a critical role in the
protection of individual liberties, addressing social change and community
concerns, redressing public grievances, advancing the cause of 'common
goods' and looking into issues of economic development. This unit will
introduce you to the concept of social movements and their importance in
influencing the society as well as state policies.
3.3 IDEOLOGY OF SOCIAL MOVEMENTS
The study of social movements has gained momentum over the last
few decades. There has been an upsurge in collective action by various
groups and communities across the globe and they seek to address issues
that are varied- which range from anti-globalisation movements, anti-nuclear
movements, peace movements, rights for the LGBTQ , environmental
movements, civil rights movements etc.
Important Social Movements
Civil Rights Movement Perhaps the most famous civil rights activist in the U.S. is Dr.
Martin Luther King, Jr., who led a nonviolent movement for
change in the 1950s and early 1960s. He advocated for

protests, grassroots organizing, and civil disobedience in place
of violent activism.
LGBTQ Rights Brenda Howard is known as the "Mother of Pride." A bisexual
Movement and polyamorous woman from New York City, Brenda
organized the first Pride parade in 1970 and popularized the
use of the word "pride" in LGBT circles.
Internal Resistance Against Also called Madiba, Nelson Mandela is revered in South Africa
Apartheid for his resistance against the apartheid state.
The Environmental The environmental movement began in the 1950s with
Movement concern over water and air safety, as well as nuclear non-
proliferation. After an oil spill in Santa Barbara in 1969, the

U.S. government passed the National Environmental Policy
Act in 1970. In the same year, the Environmental Protection
Agency was created and the first Earth Day took place.
42 Social Movements
Ideology of Social Movements Unit 3
Important Social Movements
Peace movements It encompasses Anti-war movements, Human rights
movements, Anti-Nuclear Movements which have taken place
at different times across the globe.
Such movements have taken place across different continents and

governments of the world and it has been found difficult to ignore as well
as suppress such voices.
Defining social movements:
Social movements can be thought of as collectivities acting with some degree of organization
and continuity outside of institutional or organizational channels for the purpose of challenging
or defending extant authority, whether it is institutionally or culturally based, in the group,

organization, society, culture, or world order of which they are a part.
David A. Snow, Sarah A. Soule, and Hanspeter Kriesi,
The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, Blackwell Publishing, USA, p. 11
Social movements encompass various forms of collective

mobilizations and each of these seek to address change or bring about
reforms in the existing social, economic and political conditions. Therefore,
defining social movements is a laborious and complex task. But, such
movements do reflect people's perceptions towards the system.
3.3.1 Nature of Social Movements
Regarding the nature of social movements, the following points

may be mentioned:
Ø Form of collective action: Social movements are a form of

collective action. It is different from a crowd, gang or an interest
group. As a form of collective action, it is 'goal oriented', in
pursuit of some common goal through joint action.
Ø Collective behaviour: Social movements may be

institutionalized or non-institutionalized. Traditionally, social
movements encompasses non-institutional collective action,
which include protests , marches, demonstrations, dharna and
dissent.
Social Movements 43
Ø Interest groups: Social movements overlap certain interest groups

too. Interests groups often raise important issues which affect
society and politics in a variety of ways. While interest groups are
mainly associated with politics and political processes, social
movements are much wider in scope. Interest groups further their
interests through institutionalized means, but social movements
adopt a variety of methods to achieve their goals, which include
the use of non-institutional means too. However, over a period of
years, social movements become more institutionalized and some
begin to look as well as behave as interest groups too.
Ø 'Challengers to' as well as 'defenders of' status-quo: While
some social movements want to alter the existing conditions,
some are status -quoist by nature. But the bigger debate is
about-change, but at what level? What is the area of change
that social movements try to influence-individual , societal or
institutional or global reforms? Social movements encompass
'contentious politics' wherein 'collective political struggle'
becomes a key tool in achieving political and social reforms.
Ø Organised activity: It involves pursuit of goals through joint

action. It also implies that there has to be an organization
framework which will shape the nature of struggle and will give
direction to the movement. Leadership plays an important role
in social movements. But all social movements need not have
a structure; it is essentially a 'network of interaction between
different actors', and whether it may have an formal institutional
framework or not, largely depends on the goals and the nature
of circumstances.
Ø Temporal continuity: All social movements have some degree

of temporal continuity, rather than being purely ad-hoc or
temporary in character. Social movements tend to last a little
longer and some may continue through phases of 'cycle of
protest'. It is rather a sustained kind of collective activity wherein
larger goals are addressed.
44 Social Movements
Social movements: key features
Social movements are a distinct social process, consisting of the mechanisms through which
actors engaged in collective action. They do the following-
l They are involved in conflictual relations with clearly identified opponents;
l They are linked by dense informal networks;

l They share a distinct collective identity.
Donatella Della Porta & Mario Diani, Social Movements: An Introduction, Blackwell
Publishing, USA, 2006, p.20
Social movements vary in nature, scope, goals and organization.

Some movements may be pure transitory, but some are multifaceted
and often become major players in domestic as well an international
politics.
Key similarities between different movements:
l The campaign: all movements carry out sustained actions with an orientation towards
specific goals ;
l Social movement repertoires: a standard set of actions that are used by social
movements i.e. protests, rallies, etc. and
l Displays of worthiness, unity, numbers and commitment (WUNC): WUNC displays
are carried out by social movements and social movement organizations (SMOs) in order to
legitimize themselves in the eyes of potential adherents and target authorities (Tilly, 2004).
Editors of Salem Press, Theories of Social Movements,
Salem Press, California, 2011 p.4
3.3.2 Classification of Social Movements
Social change occurs at different levels. David Aberle in his

The Peyote Religion Among the Navaho (1966) 'differentiates social
movements based both on the amount of change and the locus or
level of change sought.'
Locus of Change
Individual Social structure
Alternative movements- which Reformative movements-

Amount of Partial
began forming in the 1960s, are work to create partial societal
Change
characterized by countercultural
change in order to address
values, the rejection of
injustices and inequalities.
materialism, and the
Reformative movements tend
development of unconventional
to have as their stated goal a
lifestyles.
Social Movements 45
Locus of Change
Individual Social Structure
Amount of desire to foster and promote
Change positive change and achieve
a just social order.
Reformative movements tend

to be single issue movements.
Example: The Umbanda
religious movement (Brazil).
Total Redemptive movements- Transformative movements-
seek a total change in such as radical political
individuals. Personal recovery groups, work for total or
movements, such as Alcoholics complete structural change.
Anonymous, are popular They may participate in violent
examples of redemptive action to achieve change and
movements. may anticipate the coming of
a cataclysmic change.
Example Ku Klux Klan. (USA)
Although movements seldom fit neatly into one of the four types,
they are typically skewed more in one direction than another along
the two-change dimensions.1
3.3.3 Theories of Social Movements
Ø Relative Deprivation Theory: A common thread in the literature

is that RD is a perceived discrepancy between expectations and
reality.2 Sociologist Samuel A. Stouffer (1900-1960) is credited
with developing relative deprivation theory after World War II.
Relative deprivation theory refers to the idea that feelings of
depriva-tion and discontent are related to a desired point of
reference (i.e. refer-ence groups).
Relative deprivation theory argues that it is not merely

inequality that leads to movement emergence, but subjective
perceptions of inequality. 3 W.G. Runciman in Relative
deprivation and social justice (1966) makes an important
46 Social Movements
distinction between egoistic and fraternal relative deprivation.

‘Egoistic relative deprivation is sensed when individuals feel
unfairly deprived in comparison to other individuals. Fraternal
relative deprivation is felt by members of a social category when
they believe that their group as a whole is denied a deserved
outcome.’4 Relative deprivation theory laid down the foundation
of multiple theories of social psychology including frustration-
aggression theory, social comparison theory, equity theory, and
reference group theory. The civil rights movement in the U.S.
was born because before that movement non-white people were
“deprived” of basic rights and privileges that their white
counterparts enjoyed.
Ø Resource Mobilisation Theory: The three traditional

approaches to understanding social movements - relative
deprivation theory, mass society theory, and collective behavior
theory - are united by their efforts to understand the individual
problems that arise from social change. Developed in the 1960s,
Resource mobilization theory offers an alternative to this view
by focusing on the economic and political variables that can give
rise to social movements. In moving the emphasis from ‘why’
movements mobilise, to ‘how’ they mobilise, resource mobilisation
theorists shifted the emphasis of movement analysis away from
structural factors and towards organisational questions.5
J.C. Jenkins highlights the key arguments:
(a) movement actions are rational, adaptive responses to the

costs and rewards of different lines of action;
(b) the basic goals of movements are defined by conflicts of

interest built into institutionalized power relations;
(c) the grievances generated by such conflicts are sufficiently

ubiquitous and the formation and mobilization of movements
depend on changes in resources, group organization, and
opportunities for collective action;
Social Movements 47
(d) centralized, formally structured movement organizations are

more typical of modem social movements and more effective
at mobilizing resources and mounting sustained challenges
than decentralized, informal movement structures; and
(e) the success of movements is largely determined by strategic
factors and the political processes in which they become
enmeshed.6
Ø Structural-strain Theory: Largely based on Emile Durkheim’s
theory of anomie, the structural-strain theory was further
developed by Robert Merton in the 1930s. This theory argues
that ‘the frustration and stress caused by goal blockage increases
the likelihood of deviance, crimi-nality, and delinquency’. In
conjunction to structural strain theory, there is also a Value added
theory. It argues that:
Strain refers to the cycle of inadequate regulation at the
societal level that negatively impacts how the individual perceives
his or her needs, means, and opportunities. Value-added theory
of collec-tive behavior argues that individuals join hostile and
radical social move-ments because they experience social strain.
Social movements develop to reassure members that action is
being taken to address strain, grievances, and deprivation 67
According to N.J.Smelser ( Theory of Collective Behavior,
1965):
The theory advocates that any nascent social movement
needs six factors to grow. These six factors are: people in a society
experience some type of problem (deprivation); recognition by
people of that society that this problem exists; an ideology
purporting to be a solution for the problem develops and spreads
its influence; an event or events transpire that convert this nascent
movement into a bona fide social movement; the society (and its
government) is open to change for the movement to be effective
(if not, then the movement might die out); and mobilization of
resources takes place as the movement develops further.8
48 Social Movements
Ø New Social Movement Theory: Whereas traditional movements

and Marxian movements were addressing issues of economic
disparities and its challenges, new social movement theories
(NSMT) seek to address issues of collective identity e.g. anti-
war, ethnicity, gender, civil rights and sexuality etc. Largely
influenced by the works of Jurgen Habermas and Alain Touraine,
NSM has gained momentum and it encompasses women’s rights
movement, the environmental movement, and the anti-corporate,
anti-globalization movement.
The growth of NSM have been analysed by eminent scholars.
According to Alberto Melucci, new social movements reach out and
appeal to supporters with offers of identity and belonging. This occurs
primarily because of :
m The transition in the West from industrial to postindustrial
society;
m The rise of the new middle class9
Claus Offe considers new social movements to be non-
institutional in nature and recognizes that new social movements
and tra-ditional social movements continue to compete for
membership and notice.
The rise of a new middle class, comprised of highly educated,
economically secure individuals, is associated with the
development of new social movements. The new middle class
is thought to be particularly sympathetic to the issues advanced
by issue-based movements including the peace movement,
en-vironmental movement, women’s movement and civil-rights
movement.10
Jurgen Habermas argues that new social movements develop
from the tension between system integration (i.e. the steering
mechanisms of a society) and social integration (i.e. forces of
socialization, meaning-production, and val-ue-formation). New social
movements form at the intersection of the larger social and political
system and people’s lived experiences.11
Social Movements 49
Nine Theses on Social Movements
1.The social movements are not new, even if they have some new features, and
the 'classical ones' are relatively new and perhaps temporary;
2. Social movements display much variety and changeability, but have in common
individual mobilization through a sense of morality and (in)justice and social power
through social mobilization against deprivation and for survival and identity;
3. The strength and importance of social movements is cyclical and related to long
political-economic and (perhaps associated) ideological cycles. When the

conditions that give rise to the movements change (through the action of the
movements themselves and/or more usually due to changing circumstances), the
movements tend to disappear;

4. It is important to distinguish the class composition of social movements, which
are mostly middle class in the West, popular/working class in the South, and some
of each in the East;

5. There are many different kinds of social movements. The majority seek more
autonomy rather than state power, and the latter tend to negate themselves as
social movements;
6. Although most social movements are more defensive than offensive and tend
to be temporary, they are important (today and tomorrow perhaps the most
important) agents of social transformation;

7. In particular, social movements appear as the agents and re-interpreters of
delinking from contemporary capitalism and transition to socialism;
8. Some social movements are likely to overlap in membership or be more

compatible and permit coalition with others, and some are likely to conflict and
compete with others. It may be useful to inquire into these relations;
9. However, since social movements, like street theatre, write their own scripts - if
any - as they go along, any prescription of agendas or strategies, let alone tactics,
by outsiders - not to mention intellectuals - is likely to be irrelevant at best and
counterproductive at worst.
Frank, A. G., & Fuentes, M. (1987).
Nine Theses On Social Movements. Thesis Eleven, 18-19(1), pp.143-165.
CHECK YOUR PROGRESS
Q.1: What are the key features of social

movements?
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
50 Social Movements
Q.2: What is collective behaviour?

.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
Q.3: With which sociologist is the 'theory of anomie' associated with?
.................................................................................................................
Q.4: Write a short note on key similarities between different social
movements. (within 50 words).
.................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
3.4 DISTINGUISHING SOCIAL MOVEMENTS FROM

SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS AND SOCIAL
ASSOCIATIONS
Social institutions are a complex set of values and norms that define
roles and relationship between the individual, society and state. Social
institutions act in different ways as they constrain as well as reward behaviour.
'Macro' social institutions like the state can determine the roles as well
influence the socialization process of the individual. 'Micro' social institutions
like the 'family' greatly influence the individual in determining 'life choices'
and upbringing. However, most social institutions largely reflect the interests
of the 'dominant classes' and as such creates unique challenges for all.
Social organizations are a form of social collectivities and they are

identifiable groups that have a specific purpose. They may be 'formal' or
'informal' or organizations. Government organisations are 'formal' entities
for it involves a hierarchical structure, rules and regulations. Another form
of formal organization, utilitarian organizations, are those people join to
gain some material benefit. Taking a job at a bank or hospital constitutes
joining a utilitarian organization.12
However, there are 'informal' organisations which are not based on

any such rules or regulations, but over the years, through norms and value
system, such informal organisations become 'rigid'. There are also voluntary
organisations, example- clubs, unions etc. which are also looking to address
certain issues, which too may have a structure and specialized people may
Social Movements 51
be engaged who are pursuing the goals of such organisations. The

importance of social associations arises from the fact that it encourages
'civic participation' and 'civic engagement'.
What makes social movements distinguishable from social institutions

and social associations is that such movements try to address a bigger
cause and seek to put forward the grievances and needs of the masses in
the public domain. Grievances, resources, and opportunities are important
factors that generate social movements.13 Through active engagement and
negotiations with state agencies, social movements push forward
communitarian goals rather than individual needs. Though voluntary, people
identify with a certain cause or show solidarity towards a particular issue,
and hence they become part of such a movement. People do participate
in social movements because it gives them an opportunity to challenge or
propagate the status quo. Social movements are much broader in scope
when compared to interest or pressure groups. Very often interests and
pressure groups become part of a greater movement.
3.5 ORGANIZATIONAL AND LEADERSHIP DYNAMICS

OF SOCIAL MOVEMENT
Stages of social movement: One of the earliest scholars to study

social movement processes was Herbert Blumer, who identified four stages
of social movements' lifecycles. The four stages he described were: "social
ferment," "popular excitement," "formalization," and "institutionalization".
Scholars have refined and renamed these stages but the underlying themes
have remained relatively constant.
Four Stages of Social Movement
First Stage: l The first stage of the social movement life cycle is also known
Emergence as the "social ferment" stage by Herbert Blumer.
l This is a very preliminary stage and there is little to no

organization;
l Issues are raised by agitators and general awareness is created
amongst the masses.
52 Social Movements
Four Stages of Social Movement
Second Stage: l Also known as the "popular stage", it is clearly characterized by
Coalescence a feeling of discontentment amongst the masses.

l This stage is about finding out 'responsibilities'.
l At this point leadership emerges and strategies for success are
worked out.
l Mass demonstrations may also come to the forefront.
l During this stage, social movements are more organized and
strategic in their outlook.
Third Stage: l H. Blumer defines this stage as "formalization," and is
Bureaucratization characterized by higher levels of organization and coalition based
strategies.
l Specialised staff is appointed.
l During this stage, social movements become more powerful as
regularly they meet with political elites.

l Excessive bureaucratization also leads to emotional disconnect
Fourth Stage:
with the masses. Greater 'institutionalization' can have different
Decline
types of impacts and may decline too.
l According to Miller (1999) -there are four ways in which social
movements can decline: o Repression, o Co-optation, o Success,

and o Failure
l Another critical reason for the decline is that such movements
become part of the mainstream agenda and the issues raised by

such movements is no longer seen as a challenge to the ruling
establishment. Rather the state promotes such causes.
Effectively, their goals or ideologies are adopted by the

mainstream and there is no longer any need for a movement
CHECK YOUR PROGRESS
Q.5: According to Blumer, what are the four stages

of social movements?
..................................................................................................................
Q.6: What is 'social ferment' stage?
..................................................................................................................
Q.7: Differentiate between social movements, social institutions and
social organisations. (50 words).
..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
Social Movements 53
3.6 ROLE OF LEADERSHIP IN SOCIAL MOVEMENTS
Morris and Staggenborg have highlighted that 'Leaders are strategic

decision-makers who inspire and organize others to participate in social
movements'. 'Leaders are critical to social movements because-
l they inspire commitment,
l mobilize resources,
l create and recognize opportunities,
l devise strategies,
l frame demands,
l and influence outcomes.'14
Scholars have pointed out that the importance of the leader in social
movements is because such a person acts a 'mobilizer' that inspires
participants and also an 'articulator' who links the movement to the larger
society.15 The course and success of any social movements is largely
dependent of 'charismatic leadership'. The 'personality' of the leader , the
loyalty of 'followers' towards their leader and to the cause, all play a
significant role in shaping the course of a social movement. Leaders create
the impetus for movements by providing examples of action, directing action,
and defining problems and proposing solutions. However, works done by
several scholars also reflect that the leaders of social movements also
become 'elitist' over a period of years and digress from the original goals.
Robert Michels: Theory of political leadership
Followers willingly cede agency to their leaders. The masses are grateful to leaders for
speaking and acting on their behalf, even though leaders become political elites whose
interests conflict with those of their followers. Leaders become part of the power elite, more
concerned with organizational maintenance than the original goals of the movement.
Effectively, as Morris and Staggenborg note in their work in The

Blackwell Companion to Social Movements (2004) elaborate:
Leaders operate within structures, and they both
influence and are influenced by movement
organization and environment. They are found at
54 Social Movements
different levels, performing numerous and varied

functions. Leaders sometimes pursue their own
interests and maintain organizations at the expense
of movement goals, but different organizational
structures produce different types of leaders,
including some who work to advance movement
goals over their own interests. Different types of
leaders may dominate at different stages of
movement development and sometimes come into
conflict with one another…..
Moreover, we need to be aware that there is a vertical
ordering of leadership in most social movements.
When women are excluded from top positions they
are separated from a considerable amount of power
wielded by top movement leaders.
However, there were leaders like Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela,

Martin Luther King Jr. etc, who were able to push forward the demands of
the community and shape the future of their own country. The literature
on leadership of social movements reflects that-
l Social Background: social movement leaders

tend to come from the educated middle and upper
classes, are disproportionately male, and usually
share the race or ethnicity of their supporters;
l Educational capital: Studies of movement and
revolutionary leaders in poor and non-Western
countries also suggest that a majority of them either
come from the middle and upper classes or have
more education than their followers and 'educational
capital' is the key resource that social movement
leaders derive from their privileged backgrounds.
l Improvisation, innovation and coalition
building: Leaders of social movements are
characterized by creativity and artful experimentation;
Social Movements 55
improvisation of the same with education and

intellectual thinking, leaders play an important role
in 'framing grievances and formulating ideologies,
debating, interfacing with media, writing, orating,
devising strategies and tactics, creatively
synthesizing information gleaned from local, national,
and international venues, dialoguing with internal and
external elites, improvising and innovating,
developing rationales for coalition building.
l Women leaders as 'bridge leaders: Robnett
argues that women often function in the role of
''bridge leader,'' which she defines as ''an
intermediate layer of leadership, whose task includes
bridging potential constituents and adherents, as
well as potential formal leaders to the movement''.
l Political entrepreneurs: Resource mobilization
theorists have viewed leaders as political
entrepreneurs who mobilize resources and found
organizations in response to incentives, risks, and
opportunities; supporters are seen as rational actors
who follow effective leaders.16
l Movements and Protests: With the growth of

social media, communications and new age
technologies, the forms, nature and purpose of
collective action too have undergone a major change.
New methods of protests, new issues to protest over
and resistance to state domination have come to the
forefront. Pro-democracy movements, identity
movements and strengthening of transnational
human right network led by international NGOs have
ensured that states become more accountable to the
people.
56 Social Movements
CHECK YOUR PROGRESS
Q.8: Martin Luther King Jr., the civil right activist, is

from which country?
..................................................................................................................
Q.9: Why are leaders critical to any social movements? Mention any
two reasons.
..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
Q.10: Write very briefly on Robert Michel's 'theory of leadership'.
..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
Anti-establishment movements/ Protest Movements
Tunisia: This movement took place in Tunisia in 2011, where the
Jasmine Revolution people protested against corruption, poverty and political
repression. It finally led forced Pres. Zine al-Abidine Ben Ali to
step down from office in January 2011.This movement inspired

similar movements across the Middle East and North Africa.
2010-11 witnessed the 'Arab Spring' which comprised a

Middle East : series of pro-democracy protests and uprisings in the Middle East
Arab Spring and North Africa. Anti-government protests took part in different
parts of Middle East, which include- Jasmine Revolution (Tunisia),
Egypt Uprising of 2011, Yemen Uprising of 2011-12, Libya Revolt

of 2011, and Syria Uprising of 2011-12. Authoritarian regimes were
challenged and demonstrators faced violent crackdown by their
own security forces.
One Country, Two Systems arrangement (1997) between

Hong Kong: China and Hong Kong never really addressed the issue of political
Pro-democracy protests freedoms and rights of people of Hong Kong. In 2019, the
introduction of extradition amendment law sparked political unrest.
Though this controversial law was withdrawn, tensions still remain

between Hong Kong and China.
Whereas the earlier movements were primarily concerned about

economic injustices and labour rights, contemporary movements question
the existing structures as well as hierarchy of the state. The issue of state
accountability and political reforms has rocked the Middle East as well as
Social Movements 57
Hong Kong. Civil wars and conflict have engulfed many states in the Middle
East. The people who control the political space in the Middle-East and
other such regions of the world, seldom accept the need for reforms and in
most cases reforms have been rather too slow. Protest participation has
come to stay and this has become the dominant mode of resisting the
state authority.
3.7 LET US SUM UP
l Essentially a social movement is a form of collective action where

people and communities seek to bring about change in societal as
well as political issues.
l Social movements may encompass anti-globalisation movements, anti-

nuclear movements, peace movements, rights for the LGBTQ ,
environmental movements, civil rights movements etc.
l Social movements are a form of collective action but it is different

from a crowd, gang or an interest group.
l Herbert Blumer identified four stages of social movements' cycle.
l New social movements have gained momentum and it includes

women's rights movement, the environmental movement, and the anti-
corporate, anti-globalization movement.
l Leaders are strategic decision-makers who inspire and organize others

to participate in social movements.
l Whereas earlier movements were primarily concerned about economic

injustices and labour rights, contemporary movements question the
existing structures as well as hierarchy of the state. Protest movements
have become very dominant today.
58 Social Movements
Ans to Q No 4: The key similarities between different social movements

are:
l The campaign: all movements carry out sustained actions with

an orientation towards specific goals ;
l Social movement repertoires: a standard set of actions that are

used by social movements i.e. protests, rallies, etc. and
l Displays of worthiness, unity, numbers and commitment (WUNC):

Ans to Q No 5: The four stages are social ferment," "popular
excitement," "formalization," and "institutionalization".
Ans to Q No 6: This is a very preliminary stage and there is little to no

organization; Issues are raised by the agitators and general
awareness is created amongst the masses.
Ans to Q No 7: Social institutions are a complex set of values and norms

that define roles and relationship between the individual, society
and state; Social organizations are a form of social collectivities,
formal or informal, and they are identifiable groups that have a
specific purpose. Movements try to address a bigger cause and
seek to put forward the grievances and needs of the masses in
the public domain.
Ans to Q No 8: USA
Ans to Q No 9: Leasers are important because-
l they inspire commitment,

l they mobilize resources
Ans to Q No 10: According to this theory, the masses are grateful to
leaders for speaking and acting on their behalf, even though
leaders become political elites whose interests conflict with those
of their followers. Leaders become part of the power elite, more
concerned with organizational maintenance than the original
goals of the movement.
60 Social Movements

Q. 1 : Write the meaning of Ideology of Social Movements.
Q. 2 : What is the 'Nine Theses on Social Movements"?
B) Short Questions (Answer within 150 words)
Q. 1 : Write a note on the different types of social movements.
Q. 2 : Discuss the nature of social movements.
Q. 3 : Write a note on the relative deprivation theory.
C) Long Questions (Answer within 300-500 words)
Q. 1 : Explain the importance of leadership in social movements.
Q. 2 : Discuss the differences between social movements and other social
institutions.
End notes:
1
Doug McAdam and David A. Snow, Readings on Social Movements, Oxford University Press, New
York, 2010, p.2.
2
J. N. Gurney, & K. J. Tierney, Relative Deprivation and Social Movements: A Critical Look at
Twenty Years of Theory and Research. The Sociological Quarterly, 23(1), 1982,p.34.
3
D. Clayton, 'Peoples Classical and Contemporary Conventional Theories of Social Movements' in
Berch Berberoglu (ed) The Palgrave Handbook of Social Movements, Revolution, and Social
Transformation, Palgrave Macmillan , USA, 2019, p.23
4
M.Schmitt, J.Maes, & K. Widaman, (2010). Longitudinal effects of egoistic and fraternal relative
deprivation on well-being and protest. International Journal of Psychology, 45(2) 2010, p.123; W.
G. Runciman, Relative deprivation and social justice, Routledge, London, 1966.
5
Graeme Chesters and Ian Welsh , Social Movements, The Key Concepts, Routledge , London,
2011, p.148.
6
J. C. Jenkins, 'Resource Mobilization Theory and the Study of Social Movements', Annual Review of
Sociology, 9(1), 1983, p.528.
7
Simone I. Flynn , 'New Social Movement Theories' in Theories of Social Movements, Salem Press,
California, 2011, pp.134- 144. ; S. Weeber, & D. Rodeheaver, 'Militias at the millennium: A test of
Smelser's theory of collective behavior', Sociological Quarterly, 44(2), 2003, pp.181-205.
Social Movements 61
8
Anindya SEN & Ömer AVC , Why Social Movements Occur: Theories of Social Movements , The
Journal of Knowledge Economy & Knowledge Management / Volume: XI SPRING, p.128
9
Ibid., p.93
10
Ibid., pp.92-93
11
Ibid. , pp.94-95
12
Kathy S. Stolley, The Basics of Sociology, Greenwood Press, London, 2005, p.93
13
Bert Klandermans , 'Why Social Movements Come into Being and Why People Join Them' in
Judith R. Blau (ed)The Blackwell Companion to Sociology, 2004, USA, p.276.
14
David A. Snow, Sarah A. Soule, Hanspeter Kriesi (ed) The Blackwell Companion to Social
Movements , Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2004.
15
Aldon D. Morris and Suzanne Staggenborg, Leadership in Social Movements in David A. Snow,
Sarah A. Soule, Hanspeter Kriesi (ed) The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements Blackwell
Publishing Ltd, 2004, p.171-172.
16
Ibid., p.171-178.
*** ***** ***
62 Social Movements
UNIT 4: DURKHEIM'S CONCEPT OF ANOMIE;
CONCEPT OF RELATIVE DEPRIVATION
UNIT STRUCTURE

4.2 Introduction
4.3 Theories of Social Movements
4.4 Anomie Theory and Durkheim's Concept of Anomie
4.5 Concept of Relative Deprivation
4.6 Let Us Sum Up
4.7 Further Reading

l analyse the contribution of Durkheim to sociological theory
l understand the concept of social movements
l comprehend the idea of anomie
l understand the concept of relative deprivation
4.2 INTRODUCTION
This unit will introduce you to Emile Durkheim (15 April 1858 – 15
November 1917), who is recognized as the ‘sire of French scientific
sociology’. The contribution of Durkheim in the development of the discipline
of sociology is unparalleled. He has made considerable contribution to the
field of sociology in general and has analysed key sociological concepts
like Anomie. His major works include: The Division of Labour in
Society (1893) The Rules of Sociological Method (1895), Suicide (1897),
L’Année Sociologique (1898) and The Elementary Forms of the Religious
Life (1912). Durkheim refined the ideas of positivism put forward by Auguste
Comte and regarded sociology as the science of institutions. Largely known
Social Movements 63
Unit 4 Durheim’s Concept of Anomie; Concept of Relative Deprivation
for giving key insights into issues such as social stratification, deviance,
religion and ‘collective consciousness’, Durkheim dominated French
intellectual life. Influenced by works of Charles Bernard Renouvier and Émile
Boutroux, Durkheim sought to analyse the impact of laws, religion and
education on society. He argued that scientific laws could be deduced from
empirical observations and the importance of sociology would be seen
through the ability to discover and understand ‘social facts’.
LET US KNOW
Social movement : A persistent and organized effort

involving the mobilization of large number of people to
work together to either bring about what they believe
to be the beneficial social change or resist or reverse what they believe
to be the harmful social change.
4.3 THEORY OF SOCIAL MOVEMENTS
Social movements as a form of collective action to bring a change in

a society has been debated from various angles. Mainstream writers of
collective action, social movements and social disintegration are invariably
drawn towards ideas put forward by Durkheim who viewed “social
movements as the collective expression of aggregate psychological
dysfunction and anomie, representing a society’s failure to integrate diverse
social constituencies.” Invariably, collective action and collective conscience
are some of the key ingredients of a social movement.
Understanding Social Change: The issue of social change is associated
with the ideas of Emile Durkheim, who argued that collective action and
social consciousness are closely related. According to Durkheim, ‘society
is not just composed of individuals alone, rather it ‘has a structure and
existence of its own, apart from the individuals in it.’ People tend to act
together to achieve some common purposes and in turn it reinforces social
sentiments. Shared symbols, social bonds and representations, create
conditions wherein social consciousness based on moral foundations tends
to become more durable. Durkheim argued that a society is composed of
64 Social Movements
Durheim’s Concept of Anomie; Concept of Relative Deprivation Unit 4
more than just individuals and it encompasses ‘social facts’ which are beyond
personal concerns. Society by and large regulates human behaviour which
is patterned largely because of ‘structures’ and social facts such as religion,
value system, cultural norms affect individual behaviour in a variety of
ways. A society is essentially a complex organism which extends beyond
the individual. But compared to traditional societies, modern societies are
more liberal and social controls over the individual are rather loose.
Mechanical and Organic Society: Durkheim, in The Division of Labour in
Society argued that contemporary society represents the transition from
mechanical solidarity (relations based on closed family ties and religion) to
organic solidarity (relations based on division of labour). This transition is
because of ‘dynamic density’, i.e. it is a product of increase in the number
of individuals and growing interaction among them. The Modern society
essentially consists of relations which are impersonal and individuals being
self–sufficient is not possible. However, the issue of solidarity amongst
different segments of the society seldom exists as each sector pursues its
own interests and goals. Furthermore, a society is fragmented into several
groups and individuals, who have their own narrow interests. For Durkheim,
conflicts between the workers and the manufacturers are inevitable because
of unequal social and economic relations, which hamper any kind of
cooperation between the different segments of the society. Therefore, in
modern societies, there is less stress on ‘moral consensus’ and more on
‘functional interdependence’.
According to Durkheim, the traditional society which is based on
mechanical solidarity is characterized by ‘repressive law’, wherein common
morality and shared values dominate relations among the people. In
contrast, a modern society, where organic solidarity is predominant, is
characterized by ‘restitutive law’, where people are less attached emotionally
to societal norms and its breaches and the compliance to law is stressed
upon and its regulation is done by specialized agencies.
Collective conscience and collective responsibility: Durkheim argues
that there is a symbiotic relationship between collective action and
consciousness. Symbols and social bond strengthen collective
consciousness. Social solidarity amongst different segments of the society
Social Movements 65
are a result of ‘societal networks’. Durkheim focuses on the idea of collective

conscience, which represented a ‘totality’ of people, beliefs and sentiments,
which is less significant in as organic societies. The ‘cult of the individual’ is
a distinctive characteristic of the modern society where organic solidarity is
more prevalent. Anthony Giddens highlights that the issue of collective
conscience in the mechanical and organic societies can be distinguished on
four different dimensions- volume, intensity, rigidity and content. But with
the increased division of labour, occupational subgroups may have some
collective consciousness which is incompatible with that of their traditional
societies. It may lead to subgroups pursuing their own narrow parochial
interests. The idea of collective consciousness however continued to remain
vague because of its all-encompassing character. Collective consciousness
which encompasses ‘shared humanity’ continued to remain vague. Hence,
Durkheim soon moved towards the idea of ‘collective representation’,
represented through the institution of family, state, religious and educational
institutions, which helped him conceptualise the non-material social facts
and was also not reducible to the level of individual consciousness.
As Wray, Colen & Pescosolido note, for Durkheim, “individuals require
moral guidance and external restraint because without them their desires
and expectations will exceed their grasp, with the resulting failures and
frustrations leading to continuous states of despair.” Along with the organic
society came its own share of problems, individualism and growing sense
of disparity. As a consequence of this, anomie is the resultant condition.
Durkheim argues that due to the rise of individualism and modernization of
society, social integration has become a greater challenge. Anomie
essentially is a “condition in which society provides little moral guidance to
individuals.” Anomie signifies the weakening of social institutions, and at
times, it may lead to dysfunctional outcomes, which include suicides.
According to Durkheim, ‘pathologies’ such as anomie could be cured.

Though Durkheim was not a revolutionary or a radical Marxist, he did outline
a scheme of things wherein ‘occupational associations’ could play an important
role. Unlike Marxism, which saw a clash of interests between the workers
and the owners, Durkheim believed that such contradictions arise because
the people involved lacked ‘common morality’ which could be traced in the
66 Social Movements
‘lack of an integrative structure’. As such, occupational associations could

help serve ‘agents of the same industry united and organised into a single
group’. By doing so, ‘common interests’ of people from different categories
could be well recognized and the common need for an ‘integrative moral
system’ could be realized. The problems of modern society could be overcome
by reinforcing ‘collective morality’. Effectively, this integrative moral system
could help fight pathological trait, help prevent decline of ‘collective morality’
and could prevent atomization in modern society.
Durkheim’s contribution to understanding theory of ‘collective
movements’ is acknowledged by theoreticians like Charles Tilly in his book
Useless Durkheim (1981). While Durkheim argued about social change,
division of labour and its implications on the individual in a modern society,
it was primarily related to events taking place in the nineteenth century
Europe. ‘Multiplicity of elements’ shape social action and the actors
internalise the same and the ‘breakdown’ cannot be generalized.
The theories of social movements essentially aim to study the factors
that contribute to the transformation of society or look into conditions that
maintain the status quo. Durkheim’s views on the conflicts among social
classes essentially reflect the idea that ‘solidarity incentives’ are incompatible
with ‘individual convenience’ especially in a modern society. But occupational
groups can play an important role in reminding all the participants of ‘general
interests and reciprocal duties’. These groups may further help in organizing
public opinion as well as act as a bridge between individuals and the state.
The success of any social movement depends upon the relations based
on equal power and partnership. Success is further reflected in the
‘achievement of cultural, social and political change’. But Durkheim’s idea
of occupational groups playing an important role is self-contradictory
because the workers and owners will seldom have common goals and
common needs. However, Durkheim’s contribution to the ideas on social
movements stem from his contribution towards understanding the concepts
such as social and collective consciousness. Furthermore, the need to
have ‘occupational groups’ by Durkheim suggest that the reconciliation of
goals between different groups may be possible in the long run and can
help overcome pathological challenges faced by the members of the society.
Social Movements 67
LET US KNOW
M. Diani, points out that there are four aspects of any

social movements -
a) networks of informal interaction;
b) shared beliefs and solidarity;
c) collective action on conflictual issues;
d) action which displays largely outside the institutional sphere and
the routine procedures of social life.
Source: M. Diani 'The Concept of Social Movement', The Sociological
Review, 40(1), 1992, p.7
Source: James DEFronzo and Jungyun Gill, Social Problems and Social Movements, Women
and Littlefield, 2019, p.30, Available at https://rowman.com/webdocs/SP_CH2.pdf
68 Social Movements
CHECK YOUR PROGRESS
Q.1: What is a Social Movement?

.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
Q.2: What are social facts?
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
Q.3: What is mechanical solidarity?
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
Q.4: What is organic solidarity?
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
Q.5: What is collective conscience?
.................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
4.4 ANOMIE THEORY AND DURKHEIM'S CONCEPT

OF ANOMIE
Durkheim was deeply concerned about the decline of ‘common

morality’ in a modern society. Introduced into Sociology by Durkheim, anomie
“refers to the lack or ineffectiveness of normative regulation in society.”
Initially used to describe the changes in a society during industrial revolution,
it signaled the ‘disruption of values and norms’ of a traditional society. Anomie
has been ‘conceived as the absence or defectiveness of the social regulation
needed to bring about the cooperation between specialized functions.’ For
Durkheim, the French word ‘anomie’ meant ‘without norms’ which was used
to describe the state of societies rather than of individuals that underwent
when they shifted from agrarian village economies to an industrial modern
society. However, the effects of anomie were well felt by the individuals
because of such transition in their economic lifestyle. Individuals are
confronted with anomie when ‘moral constraints’ decline; and the issues of
Social Movements 69
‘acceptable behaviour’ tend to be challenged more frequently by the

individuals concerned. Largely identified with a social-psychological
condition, over a period of time, the term was broadly used and there is
considerable discrepancy in its usage.
The concept of anomie is fluidic in nature and it has been interpreted

by Durkheim differently at different times. In his book, The Division of labor
in Society, he defined it as a ‘condition of inadequate procedural rules to
regulate complementary relationship among the specialized and
interdependent parts of a complex social system.’ In another work, Suicide,
Durkheim described anomie as a condition of inadequate moral norms to
guide and control the actions of people and groups in the interests of the
total social system. DiChrintina in the article ‘Durkheim’s theory of anomie
and crime: A clarification and elaboration’ (2016) highlights the different
ways Durkheim reinterpreted the concept of anomie. In The Division of
Labor, Durkheim discussed anomie in terms of an abnormal form of the
division of labour. In Suicide, Durkheim presented another description of
anomie. There he proposed a distinction between egoistic, anomic, altruistic,
and fatalistic suicide—the first two being more common in modern societies
and the last two more common in pre-modern societies. At times, in
Durkheim’s work, the term anomie appears to represent excessive
imprecision and weakening of the ‘‘collective or common consciousness.’’
Again, Durkheim stated, ‘‘... anomie is the contradiction of all morality.’’
The cause of anomie: For Durkheim, a ‘natural wellspring’ within human

beings brings forth limitless desires and heightened expectations. Durkheim
believed that no person can be happy unless their needs are proportional
to their means at their disposal. Mechanical solidarity that is prevalent in
traditional societies helps constrain such heightened expectations. As a
result, frustrations and deviant behaviour is curbed. But such restraints are
loosened in an organic society.
Ruohui Zhao & Liqun Cao have reflected in their article in Social
Forces (2010) that ‘Durkheim is specifically concerned with the social
transition from a rural society with mechanical solidarity to an urban society
70 Social Movements
with organic solidarity and the spread of anomie during this unique period’.
According to Durkheim, agrarian village economies are governed by certain
norms, values and expectations. This pattern of behaviour is identified as
‘mechanical solidarity’. However, with the emergence of industrialism and
spread of capitalism, mechanical solidarity begins to decline and is replaced
by ‘organic solidarity’. The presence of organic solidarity is largely facilitated
by the presence of the division of labour. But the transition from mechanic
to organic solidarity takes place over a period of time. This transient phase
is characterized by a ‘state of relative normative disorientation’ which is
described as ‘anomic’. In towns and larger cities, social control and moral
constraints and restraints on individuals seem to be less prevalent. As a
result, in an environment where there is ‘inadequate normative direction’,
people are rather confused about what constitutes ‘acceptable behaviour’.
Durkheim sees anomie as a ‘state of social disintegration’ and argued that
the rise of anomie is closely linked to the incompatibility between individual
standards and greater social standards, which then essentially leads to
moral degeneration.
Europe was undergoing economic transformation and Durkheim was

quick to analyse the consequences of this transformation on the society
and the individuals. He was of the view that with the growth of industrialism,
the level of interaction between the different actors decreases. As a result,
owing to mechanization and specialization, the sense of collective solidarity
amongst workers declines. He believed that during times of social transition,
“collective consciousness” is largely weakened and there is slackening of
previously held norms and moral convictions as social control inevitably
become loose.
However, the central ‘pathology’ in modern societies is the ‘anomic

division of labour’. Durkheim’s idea of anomie is not only found in his book
The Division of Labour, but it has also been a major part of Suicide (1897).
Di Christina concludes, “Although Durkheim’s conception of anomie is
somewhat elusive, it is safe to conclude that he viewed it as a phenomenon
that involves different kinds of deregulation, affects different spheres of
Social Movements 71
collective life, often accompanies rapid social change, and has a variety of
unfavorable effects on society.” Durkheim believed that because it is a
pathological problem, curing the same is also possible. Anomie is a
pathological condition associated with an organic society wherein there is
loosening of common morality and individuals become more isolated, which
may lead to suicides. Essentially, anomic suicide is linked with the decline of
collective morality and insufficient external regulation of individual behaviour.
CHECK YOUR PROGRESS
Q.6: Name any two books written by Durkheim.

..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
Q.7: According to Durkheim, what are the different forms of suicide?
..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
Q.8: What does 'anomie' mean?
..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
4.5 CONCEPT OF RELATIVE DEPRIVATION
The concept of relative deprivation “links the individual with the

interpersonal and intergroup levels of analysis.”1 The concept of relative
deprivation in the study of social movements can be traced back to ideas
put forward by Marx, de Tocqueville and Durkheim. The idea of ‘relative
deprivation’ has usually been studied in the context of a reference group.
Since then, there have been studies done by eminent sociologists and
writers like R. Merton, T. Gurr and Denton Morrison, wherein it was identified
with the ‘perception that individual achievements have failed to keep pace
with individual expectations’. Denton Morrison points out that relative
deprivation is ‘that feelings of deprivation, of discontent over one’s situation,
and it depends on what one wants to have; that is, deprivation occurs in
relation to desired points of reference, often ‘reference groups,’ rather than
in relation to how little one has.’2 He further points out that ‘social movements
72 Social Movements
are thought to emerge and flourish when groups of persons experience

relative deprivation.’3 Relative deprivation theory also highlights the ‘potential
gulf separating aspiration and the means to fulfil them, especially in times of
accelerated change.’4Traggot notes, ‘Durkheim observed that the conditions
of low integration produced a variety of symptomatic consequences ranging
from individual disorientation to social conflict.’5 Gurley and Tierney further
note, ‘Essentially it is the perceived discrepancy between expectation and
reality.’6
Koktsidis points out that ‘deprivation theorists prefer to speak of a
“relative”, “comparative” and “proportionate” type of deprivation leading to
frustration and violence, rather than “absolute” and “generalized” levels of
poverty. The term relative points to the essential idea that another person
or group provides the base of comparison of one’s needs and gratification.’7
Through the notion of reference groups, James Geschwender asserts that
‘status inconsistency’ as well as ‘rising expectations’ are very much
associated with the concept of relative deprivation.8 An individual compares
his/her position to others in the group; furthermore, one group may also
compare its status with other groups as well.
Source: Smith, H. J., Pettigrew, T. F., Pippin, G. M., & Bialosiewicz, S. (2011). Relative
Deprivation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(3), 203-232. doi:10.1177/
1088868311430825
Social Movements 73
Durkheim extensively studied the societal problems that were

associated with Industrial Europe. As such, his views on social disintegration,
anomie and forced division of labour have been path breaking. Durkheim
sought to analyse the challenges an individual and communities face during
economic transition, especially when moving from a mechanical to an
organic society. For Durkheim, ‘social groups have structural properties
where norms, values and on-going social relationships place constraints
on the individual’. But invariably, with the emergence of an organic society,
the growing forced division of labour creates conditions of anomie where
the individuals face difficulties in adjusting to the new social environment.
Mueller elucidates, ‘Anomie—the lack of regulation or deregulation of social
life-is the result of rapid and radical social change. But anomie does not
mean a fundamental crisis of the system, but rather a crisis of adaptation.’9
In the Industrial societies, there is a marked contradiction between

individual need and social goals. In such societies, self-interest is dominant
and there is ‘increased division of labour both within and between various
enterprises which lead to greater vulnerability of the productive system’.
Capitalist economies create conditions wherein there is increased bargaining
between the different workers and this results in adhoc and piecemeal
agreements in settlement of interests between groups. Issues of social
integration, lack of cohesion and mismatch between personal ambitions
and means create greater problems for the individuals and the society in
the long run. Ken Thomson in his book Emile Durkheim (2002) points out
that rapid economic changes lead to conflict of interests and it also leads
to growing discrepancies between a group’s expectation and their
achievement. In such a condition of relative deprivation, norms governing
the means of goal attainment break down and it results in anomie and
increased disorder.10 According to Durkheim, if excessive individualism is
to be curbed, forced division of the labour has to be abolished. Durkheim
proposes radical institutional reforms which will help overcome the
distresses that come along when moving from a mechanical to an organic
society. It includes abolition of inheritance of private property, introduction
74 Social Movements
of meritocratic principles of occupational recruitment and regulation of

employment contracts to prevent unfair exploitation.
Durkheim does suggest the importance of occupational groups which

has ‘moral power’ in ‘containing individual egos, of maintaining spirited
sentiment of common solidarity in the consciousness of all the workers, of
preventing the law of the strongest from being brutally applied to industrial
and commercial relations.’
CHECK YOUR PROGRESS
Q.9: What is a 'reference group'?

..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
4.6 LET US SUM UP
l Durkheim has made key contributions to the field of sociology and

has analysed the important sociological concepts like anomie and
suicide.
l According to Durkheim, ‘the importance of sociology lies in its ability
to discover and understand ‘social facts’.’
l In The Division of Labour in Society, ‘Durkheim, argued that the
contemporary society represents the transition from mechanical
solidarity to organic solidarity.’
l According to Durkheim, ‘pathologies’ such as anomie could be cured
and ‘occupational associations’ could play an important role in this
process.
l Relative deprivation and reference groups are closely linked. Durkheim
argued that ‘rapid economic changes lead to the conflict of interests
and it also leads to the growing discrepancies between a group’s
expectation and their achievement.’
Social Movements 75
Ans to Q No 5: Durkheim focuses on the idea of collective conscience,

which represented a 'totality' of people's beliefs and sentiments,
which is less significant in the organic societies.
Ans to Q No 6: a. The Division of Labour in Society (1893)
b. The Rules of Sociological Method (1895)
Ans to Q No 7: The different forms of suicide are- egoistic, anomic,
altruistic, and fatalistic suicide.
Ans to Q No 8: Introduced to sociology by Durkheim, 'anomie refers to
the lack or ineffectiveness of normative regulation in society'.
Initially, used to describe the changes in a society during industrial
revolution, it signaled the 'disruption of values and norms' of a
traditional society.
Ans to Q No 9: Individual or group behaviour is often compared to other
individual and groups. These are known as reference groups.

Q. 1 : What is social change?
Q. 2 : What is the cause of anomie?
Q. 3 : According to Durkheim, what is the cure for pathologies like anomie?
B) Short Questions (Answer within 150 words)
Q. 1 : Write a note on the idea of Anomie.
Q. 2 : Mention the major works of Durkheim.
Q. 3 : Explain the relationship between collective conscience and collective
responsibility.
C) Long Questions (Answer within 300-500 words)
Q. 1 : Discuss the concept of social facts.
Q. 2 : Discuss the concept of relative deprivation.
Q. 3 : Analyse the contribution of Durkheim to sociological theory.
Social Movements 77
End notes:
1
H. J. Smith, T. F. Pettigrew, G. M.Pippin, & S. Bialosiewicz (2011). Relative Deprivation. Personality
and Social Psychology Review, 16(3), 2011, p. 203.
2
Denton E. Morrison, 'Some Notes Toward Theory on Relative Deprivation, Social Movements, and
Social Change', American Behavioral Scientist, Vol.14,5, p.695.

3
ibid., p.695.
4
Mark Trauggot, 'Durkheim and social movements', European Journal of Sociology , Volume 25
Issue 02 November 1984, p.319.

5
ibid., p.321.
6
Joan Neff Gurney and Kathleen J. Tierney , 'Relative Deprivation and Social Movements: A Critical
Look at Twenty Years of Theory and Research', The Sociological Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 1 (Winter,
1982), p.34.
7
P. I. Koktsidis, 'From deprivation to violence? Examining the violent escalation of conflict in the
Republic of Macedonia', Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict, 7(1), 2014, p.3.

8
James Geschwender, 'Social structure and the Negro revolt: an examination of some
hypotheses',Social Forces ,43 (December) , 1964,pp. 248-56.

9
Hans-Peter Müller, 'Social Differentiation and Organic Solidarity: The "Division of Labor" Revisited',
Sociological Forum, Vol. 9, No. 1, Special Issue: The 100th Anniversary of Sociology's First Classic:
Durkheim's "Division of Labor in Society." (Mar., 1994), p.80.

10
Ken Thomson, Emile Durkheim, Routledge, New York, 2002, p.85.
*** ***** ***
78 Social Movements
UNIT 5: SOCIAL MOVEMENTS AND SOCIAL
CHANGE
UNIT STRUCTURE

5.2 Introduction
5.3 Meaning and Definition of Social Change
5.4 Factors Responsible for Social Change
5.5 Different Theories of Social Change
5.6 Impact of Social Change; Reform, Revival, Revolution and
Counter Movements
5.7 Let Us Sum Up
5.8 Further Reading

l know about the meaning and definition of social change
l explain the factors responsible for social change
l discuss the different theories of social change
l describe the impact of social change
5.2 INTRODUCTION
Change is the law of nature. In this world everything changes with

time, so the society. The old order of a society has always been in constant
change and gets replaced by a new order. There are many scholars who
had tried to understand the idea of social change at different periods of
history. There are many definitions of social change, but going through all
these, we can come to a conclusion that social change more or less is
concerned with two levels of changes. The first is that it is associated with
the changes in the social structure of the society and the second, it is
Social Movements 79
Unit 5 Social Movements and Social Change
related to the changes in the values and social norms which is mainly
responsible for social cohesion, or in other words, binding people together
in society in order to maintain a proper social order. There are many factors
as well as theories of social change because of which it is not an isolated
event. With social change there also emerges different consequences or
impact. This chapter therefore deals with the various important concepts
related to social change.
5.3 MEANING AND DEFINITION OF SOCIAL CHANGE
Meaning:
One of the most permanent laws of nature is change. Everything

changes with time because nothing is permanent. All matters in the universe
go through a phase of transition, transformation or substitution, including
the society. The society is under a constant change since its inception. The
old order of a society has always been replaced by a new order. No one on
earth can claim that the society remains as it is, through the history of
mankind. If we keenly observe, we find a large amount of variation in society
of traditional period and the modern or contemporary period. There were
different periods in which man lived in different types of societies and which
significantly evolved from one pattern to another. The growth from the
Paleolithic era up to the Neolithic, then to the Stone Age and subsequently
to the copper age is the finest evidence of social change that took place.
Therefore, the changes in a society take place in different variations which
include the social structure, social institutions, social practices, social
behaviours, social relations, traditions and habits etc. that can be termed
as social change. It is the alteration or change in the earlier or previous
style of continuation. Social change is purely a universal phenomenon.
Definitions:
There are many scholars and thinkers who have put forward
their own perspectives on the idea of social change. As such, it is important
for us to go through some of the popular definitions in order to have a
better insight to the concept of social change.
80 Social Movements
Social Movements and Social Change Unit 5
Ginsberg was of the view that social change has always associated
itself with any change in the social structure.
Kingsley Doris elucidated that social change are those alternations

which mainly take place in the social organization which involves the social
structure and functions of the society.
Merril and Elbridge claimed that social change is the process in which
a large number of people engaged themselves in activities which are
different or vary from their past generations or fore-fathers.
According to Gillin and Gillin, the variations in the accepted way of

life of the people in the society is social change. The social change may
take place due to changes in the geographical locations or the cultural
elements and also due to the composition of the population. Moreover,
social change also involves an ideological perspective of change.
Jones explained that the term social change signifies the variations
or modification of any feature of social activities and process, social
interaction, social patterns or social organization.
M. D. Jenson described that social change is the process of alteration

in people’s ways of doing something or thinking.
According to Maclver and Page, the idea of social change involves

the different level of changes that takes place in man’s life. Primarily, it is
the total change in the condition of life of the man. It also includes the
changes in the beliefs and attitude of the people, and lastly it involves all
the other changes that go beyond the human control to the biological and
physical nature of things.
Morris Ginsberg holds the view that the process of social change is
the modification of the social structure. For example, he put forward the
process of change which brings changes in the size of the society, the
social composition or the sense of balance of its elements and also the
nature of the social organization.
P. Fairchild has defined social change as something which is entirely

associated with the aspects of social process and its modifications and
variations of pattern or form.
Social Movements 81
B. Kuppuswamy elucidated that social change is the process in which

there is visible changes or alternation takes place in the functioning and
structure of a particular social system.
H.M. Johnson claimed that social change is either the change in the
structure or quasi- structural features of a social system.
Anderson and Parker has stated that social change is the

modifications in the social structure or functioning of societal functions and
processes.
H.T. Mazumdar gave the view that social change is a new fashion or
mode related to the social life of the people. It either modifies or replaces
the social practices of the people with regard to the society and its
operations.
By analyzing the above definitions, we can come to a conclusion that
social change more or less is concerned with two levels of changes. The
first is that it is associated with the changes in the social structure of the
society, and the second, it is related with the changes in the values and
social norms which are mainly responsible for social cohesion. But, it is
important at this stage to understand that the two levels of changes must
not be treated as separate. In fact, both are related, a change in one can
lead to a change in the other.
LET US KNOW
One of the basic characteristic of social change is

that it is primarily social. It is entirely related to the
society and is different structures and institutions.
Social relationship is the main area of social change. Social change
is a universal phenomenon. Not a single society in this world is static.
It is a continuous process. There is no value judgment in social
change. It is neutral. Moreover, there are many factors which
contribute to social change.
82 Social Movements
CHECK YOUR PROGRESS
Q.1: One of the most permanent laws of nature is

the change. (True/False)
.................................................................................................................
Q. 2: Social change is purely a ................................... phenomenon.
(Fill in the blank).
Q. 3: What is social change?
.................................................................................................................
Q. 4: What was Gillin and Gillin’s view on social change?
.................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
5.4 FACTORS RESPONSIBLE FOR SOCIAL CHANGE
Social change basically involve two changes- one is the macro

changes and other is the micro changes. The changes which occur at
institutional and structural levels of society are the macro changes whereas
the changes which take place daily are the micro changes. Whatever
may be the type of social change, we must remember that there are
many factors which are responsible for social change. Some of these
include, the demographic, natural, technological, cultural and economic
changes.
l Demographic Factors
One of the most important factors of social change is the demographic

factor. The change in the population of a society drastically leads to different
social changes. The change in the population composition of a society is
directly proportional to the social structural change of the particular society.
It is also natural that the population and its composition of a society are
always changing and therefore social change is obvious. Generally, the
population of an area changes with the migration of people, war, natural
calamities, invasion etc. Now, let us consider the issues responsible for
social change.
Social Movements 83
A reciprocal relationship has always existed between the population

and social structure. The social structure influences population changes
and the changes in population too influence the social structure. For
instance, if we consider the population ratio or sex ratio, a proper ratio for
proper balance between male and female in the society is 1:1. A change in
this ratio definitely leads to changes in the society. The presence of more
numbers of female leads to a different set of law courts, marriage system
and family organizations. Moreover, the presence of more number of women
degenerate the status and position in the community. If the population of
adults is more than others there will be need for more regulations. If the
older population exceeds the general people, then the society will be less
prone for any type of change or new progress. The decline or rise in both
the birth rate and the death rate also brings different social transformation.
Lastly, the migration of people also leads to social change both in case of
internal and external migration.
There is high economic growth in the developed countries which leads

to high social standards of living. On the other hand, the developing countries
with high population have to face many difficulties which include increase
in birth rate, lower standards of health, problem of unemployment, different
sorts of violence and crime. This happens because of low economic growth
in such societies. Therefore, it can be summed up that the effects of
demography on the society are many fold which includes changes in the
society, changes in the economy, changes in the education system and
also in the values, politics and culture of a society.
l Natural Factors
Man is always deeply connected with nature. Social change is

responsible also for natural factors which include different national
calamities like floods, earthquakes, drought, and epidemics. All these
are directly disruptive for the social system. It brings an overall change in
the social conditions of the people affected by the natural problems. It
makes large scale damages not only on the victims but on the overall
social atmosphere. For instance, after a large scale natural devastation,
84 Social Movements
the redevelopment works might deprive the weak or less powerful to avail
the services and opportunity for development. As such, in such a society
where the natural factors create two classes encompassing the privileged
and unprivileged, there would always be different social culture, norms,
values etc., contributing towards a social change for future progress and
development.
Human beings and the physical environment depend on each other.

The physical environment comprises the forests, deserts, mountains, and
everything which nature has provided them. People exploit the physical
environment or natural resources for their own interest. This leads to both
positive and negative impacts. The positive impact may comprise all the
possibilities for development and progress of mankind that human beings
could acquire with the use and exploitation of the physical environment.
On the other hand, the negative actions encompass deforestation, pollution
and misuse of the natural resources. Therefore, the change that occurs in
the physical environment brings about a change in the society and its people
as a whole and the changes of the society would put pressure on the physical
or natural environment.
l Technological Factors
The modern age is the age of technology. Technological development

has drastically brought a change in the lives of all the people around the
globe. Today is the age of globalization and the advancement in technology
has brought dramatic social changes. In this regard, famous thinkers like
Ogburn and Nimkoff have rightly observed that though we consider
capitalism in this modern period to be the driving force behind all the social
changes that are visible, it is not just capitalism. The technological field
and its associated developments are all together responsible for social
changes, and capitalism is just the by-product of the technological
innovations. The economic structure and relations have undergone an all-
round transformation due to the effects of technology. The old values, norms,
culture, traditions etc. have been replaced and a new set of social norms
and values have taken up their place which would lead to the social change.
Social Movements 85
The technological changes have provided better communication

facilities among the people, more job opportunities and advancement in
social security as well as national defense. The advancement in the field of
technology which has been induced in the modern society has led to the
changes in our family system. Nuclear families have now come up.
Cultural Lag: The term
cultural lag refers to the Moreover, there is a transformation in women’s role in the modern societies.
notion that culture takes There are also changes that have been observed in human relationships.
time to catch up with
There is now lack of religious interference in social life of the people. All
technological
these factors have more or less brought a drastic change in the social
innovations, and that
social problems and institutions of people’s social life. But, there is also a negative dimension of
conflicts are caused by the technological development. In many societies, this has led to a cultural
this lag.
lag.
l Cultural Factors
The change in the technology has also brought a change in the

culture of the society. As such different cultural factors are responsible
for social change which has been more profound after its contact with the
technological advancements. It is to be noted here that culture is always
responsive to the changing environment. For instance, the culture of the
people in the medieval age is different from the culture of the modern
age. The people of the modern period are sounder with ideas like equality,
justice, and liberty whereas the ancient people were not so much aware
about such concepts. These ideas and customs lead to social changes.
Therefore, the social systems can be regarded as directly or indirectly a
creation of the culture of the society. Dawson and Gettys have rightly
observed that culture gives a definite speed and definite direction to social
change.
There are two main aspects of the cultural change in the society.
One is by discovery and invention and the other by diffusion and borrowing
which lead to the change of culture. Discovery and invention take place
within a society, it is from inside the system. Different knowledge systems
lead to change in the habits of thinking which later shape values and norms
86 Social Movements
for the society. This in turn becomes an important element of social change.
The second one that is by diffusion and borrowing elucidates the association
of one culture with another from outside the society. Different cultural
patterns have undergone transformation in this process. Cultural trait has
been adopted by the people of a society from another culture with whom
they came in contact. For example, we often say nowadays many cultures
have adopted the western culture. All these would finally lead to social
change.
l Economic Factors
The economic factors are also important factors for social change. In
fact, the existence of the society and its day to day practices solely depend
upon the economic conditions of the people as well as the system. The
modern societies are the creation of the evolution process that started
right from the pre-historic times. As such, the economic system of the
societies have also gone through different phases of transitions. People
who in the past just survived on hunting and food gathering are now a part
of the industrialized world. This is the greatest evidence of social change
where economic influences played major role. In other words, economic
changes are directly proportional to the social changes. Different
components of the society which include the educational, technological,
scientific prosperity and many others are affected by the development in
economy and thus leading to an overall social change. Karl Marx was the
main thinker who emphasized the connection of the economy and society.
According to him, the means of production and distribution determines the
social structure of a nation. Whenever there are changes in the means of
production, the society automatically changes.
ACTIVITY 5.1
Try to list out the major social changes that took place
in the Pre-independent and Post-independent India.
Social Movements 87
CHECK YOUR PROGRESS
Q.5: One of the most important factors of social

change is the demographic factor. (True/False)
..................................................................................................................
Q.6: The social systems can be regarded directly or indirectly as a
creation of the ____________of the society. (Fill in the blank)
Q.7: What is Cultural Lag?
..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
Q.8: Name the different factors of social change?
..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
5.5 DIFFERENT THEORIES OF SOCIAL CHANGE
The idea of social change has been interpreted in many forms and
as such it has led to the emergence of different theories. Now, let us look
at some of the theories of social change which include Determination Theory,
Evolutionary Theory, Cyclical Theory, Economic Theory and Religion Theory.
l Determination Theory
According to the theory of determination, every society is changing

with the passage of time and it actually deteriorates each passing day. It
changes its course from happiness towards dissatisfaction and from peace
to chaos. This makes the demand for social change even sounder and
determined. The people in the society wanted to live in an atmosphere
which could provide them with the opportunities for self-development and
appraisal. As such, people wanted to bring about a change in the old
customs and practices and move towards a newer one. In other words, the
basic human nature makes way for social changes.
l Evolutionary Theory
Social change can be categorically placed under two sorts of

evolutions. One is the uni-dimensional evolution and other is the multi-
88 Social Movements
dimensional evolution. Uni-dimensional evolution held the view that societies

generally process in a single line that is from the simple form to the more
complex one or from the primitive towards more differentiated one. Whereas
the multi-dimensional evolution took the structural, institutional, and cultural
development of a society into account. They argue that these developments
of a society actually pass through many evolutionary phases.
The idea of evolution basically came into the domain of social sciences
from the biological evolution concept put forwarded by Charles Darwin. He
elucidated that all species of organisms have aroused and developed
through a natural process which teaches the individuals to increase their
ability to reproduce, survive, and compete. Auguste Comte was another
thinker who explains that society passed through three different stages
which include the theological, metaphysical and positive stage. The first
type of stage stressed on supernatural beliefs. The second stage was the
stage of metaphysics. The third stage was empirical and paved way for
cyclic studies. Then it was Herbert Spencer who described the concept of
social change by comparing societies with organism. The prior society was
a militant society that focused mainly on survival, and then came the
industrialism in which differentiation was evolved, and finally, the societies
moved towards integration.
l Irregular Social Changes Theory
Similar to the Darwin’s idea of evolution based on biology, it was

William Ogbur who introduced this particular theory of social change. The
irregular theory of social change asserts that the culture is divided into
two main kinds which include the material culture or non-material or
adaptive culture. In case of material culture, the social changes take place
at a very fast speed. While on the other hand, social changes in terms of
non-material domain responds slowly to any kind of change. The gap
between material and non-material culture is basically the cultural lag
which is the source of all kinds of disharmony and maladjustment in the
society. Forest, for instance, may be destroyed because conservation
policies lag behind modern agriculture, new industrial needs may not be
Social Movements 89
met by antiquated educational systems, and traffic regulation may be

ineffectual as far as the latest means of transportation are concerned.
However, this theory has its own weakness as nothing is presented clearly
portraying changes or causes of changes in the material culture itself.
However, the thinker is credited for highlighting the cultural lag and
showing how technology could leave an impact on the society, thus giving
impetus to different social changes.
l Theory of Systematic Efforts
Ludwig Stein and Hobhouse are the ones who belong to this school
of thought. According to them, social change does not come of its own.
They reject the idea of materialistic and non-materialistic factors of social
change. On the other hand, they believed that there are certain systematic
efforts which are actually responsible for social change. These include the
spreads of knowledge and literacy which in the long run is responsible for
bringing up changes in the society. According to them, our conscious efforts
in a planned way are more effective for bringing a social change than
unplanned and unsystematic efforts because in the latter processes, social
process is very slow.
l Cyclical Theory
The main assumption of the cyclical theory is that a society is similar

to a living being which possess a life cycle. Oswald Spengler and Arnold J.
Toynbee are the ones who are credited for the development of the theory.
They elucidated that the societies and civilizations actually change according
to a cycles which comprise the rise, decline and finally fall just similar to a
human being who is born, mature, grow old, and finally die. According to
German thinker Spengler, the life cycle of every society is also
predetermined life. The society after passing through the different stages
do not stop at the end but it returns back to the original position and the
style starts again. For example, J.B. Bury’s analysis on social change and
society came to the conclusion that great civilizations like Roman, Greek
and Egyptian civilizations went through the similar fashion and finally met
their end of the cycle.
90 Social Movements
It was also August Comte who portrayed change in a cyclic order. He

said that the society has undergone three main stage. These are theological,
metaphysical and positive. In the theological stage, society believes in the
existence of supernatural powers and accepted the idea that these powers
are essential and important which control our social behaviour. The next
stage is the metaphysical stage in which Comte’s ideas on supernatural
powers has changed and from God, he came to abstraction and tried to
explain social behavior through abstraction. In the third stage which is called
positive stage, everything is being empirically studied and all this is going
on in a cyclical order.
l Economic Theory
The economic theory of social change assumes that the economic

conditions of the society are mainly responsible for social changes that
take place in the society. In order to explain the economic interpretation of
social changes we must refer to the Marxian analysis of society in terms of
economy. It divides the society into two structures. One is the infra-structure
and other the super-structure. The first one consists of the forces and
relations of productions. The second one consists of those elements of the
social system, which include the legal, ideological, political and religious
institutors, which is responsible in maintaining the infra-structure and which
are changed by it.
The main founder and advocate of this theory, Karl Marx argues that
the state of productive forces determines the socio-economic structure of
society. This had led to the creation of two classes in the society, have and
have-not, and in each social transition there has been a class struggle
between the two contradicting classes. According to Marx, the driving force
of social change is nothing but the class struggle. He therefore remarked
that ‘the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles’.
Conflict in societies is inevitable. There is no single society where there is
no conflict. As such, these are the factors altogether which lead to the
changes of the societies.
Social Movements 91
l Religious Theory
Religious theory was supported by many who actually did not agree
with the arguments of Karl Marx on economic determinism. According to
the opponents, economic factor is not the sole factor for social change. It is
religion rather than economics which is mainly responsible for social change.
It was mainly Max Weber who greatly contributed to the idea that religion is
solely responsible for bringing about a change in society. He justified his
arguments on grounds that the emergence of religions like Hinduism, Islam,
Christianity or Judaism has brought substantial social changes in the past
as well as present and this is the sole reason why thinkers like Weber gave
more importance to religion rather than to the economic aspects of life with
regard to the social changes.
CHECK YOUR PROGRESS
Q.9: The main founder and advocate of economic

theory is Karl Marx (True/False)
..................................................................................................................
Q.10: According to the theory of determination, every society is
changing with the passage of _________ (Fill in the blank)
Q.11: What are the different theories of social change?
..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
5.6 IMPACT OF SOCIAL CHANGE
The term social change itself reflects that it is the alteration of the
existing order of the society. When there is a social change, it always leaves
its traces in the society. There are different impacts that social change can
bring along with them. Some of them include reform, revival, revolution
and counter movements.
l Reform
The first impact of social change is that it seeks to reform the present
structure or institutions or practices of the society in order to improve it.
92 Social Movements
However, we must understand that there is a difference between social

change and social reform and one must not consider both on the same
line. When we refer to social change, it signifies that it can be either positive
or negative alteration of the society. For instance, there can be social change
in different phases and each phase might experience a difference in terms
of women’s position in the society. It is not that the position would improve
with social changes. It might get degraded at some point and might revive
at the other. As such, social change has been always considered a value-
neutral term.
On the other hand, social reform is a positive concept and is

desirable in the society to make it more stable and orderly. For instance,
if women’s participation in politics or economy has significantly increased
as compared to the preceding years, then it would be considered a positive
aspect of social change which is nothing but a social reform. Social change
therefore, brings along with them both negative and positive changes.
The positive changes bring prosperity to the society and reform the entire
society in such a way that it provides ample scope to the individuals to
grow and make progress in various spheres of life. If we look into the
history of mankind, we would find that different social changes have led
to different social reforms or reform movements. One such popular reforms
which the changing Indian society has observed has been Mahatma
Gandhi’s model of self-sufficient villages through the means of the spinning
wheel.
l Revival
The prominent impact of social change is the revival. Revival generally

refers to the religious reawakening or transformation that social change
brings about. We all know that religion has always been an active torch
bearer of social change. But the social change also affects religion in
different ways. We can easily observe that many nations have been built
up on the basis of religion and there are many who did not make religion
their base in nation building. But, the changes in a society always lead to
religious revival.
Social Movements 93
When a new religion in a colony is introduced, we must understand

that it is not introduced into a vacuum. The society already has exciting
beliefs, traditions and practices which are responsible for performing certain
social responsibilities within the society. An all new set of values and attitudes
come in place in the society when a new religion is received by a society.
But, the existing religions are challenged on the basis of their stability in the
society. There are five functions which a religion performs- social solidarity,
social control, social change, psychological support, and provision of meaning.
However, all these functions go through a phase of transition when a new
and alternative religion comes into the society. The new religion would start
to dictate many of the social functions and the existing religions would start
to face complexities as their power and control in the society diminishes.
l Revolution
Social Change and social revolution have a close relationship with

each other. There is always essential change in a society associated with
a social revolution. It entirely changes the power dynamics in the society.
Generally, revolutions in a society occur when there is a wider dissatisfaction
of the people with the existing system or order and when people become
determined that change is important. This generally takes place when
there is a social change and people become more aware of their existing
system and their drawbacks. This particular change of the mindset of the
people in the society leads to revolution. It is also important for us to
understand that revolution is not reform. Reform is mainly narrow in their
scope and affect whereas revolution is something more wide and believes
in the overthrowing of the existing order of the State and society. It brings
another social, political and economic change in the society.
There are different causes for which revolution occurs. One of the
important cause is the class conflict or struggle in the society. Karl Marx
was one of the thinkers who has given a proper explanation of the
revolutionary change through his dialectical and historical materialism.
Moreover, the cultural changes in the society are also responsible for
revolution. The presence of dominant cultural values or practices in the
society may threaten the existence of a certain group of people. In due
94 Social Movements
course of time, this leads to a revolution. A popular revolution which had

grabbed the world’s attention was the French Revolution of the 1700’s.
l Counter Movements
Counter Movements are those movements which generally take place

in opposition to other social movements. Generally, when there is an
emergence of a particular social movement, there also emerges a counter
movement. The main agenda of such counter movements are basically to
undermine the social movements which they are opposing. A prominent
example of counter movements are the movements which are raised against
movements for the global warming. While one group demands actions for
global warming from the states, the other groups reject the idea that there
is anything negative associated with the current problem of global warming.
Likewise, the feminist movement in different parts of the world has also led
to the emergence of different counter movements as well.
CHECK YOUR PROGRESS
Q.12: The term social change itself reflects that it

is the alteration of the existing order of the society.
(True/False)
..................................................................................................................
Q.13: Social Change and social ...................... have a close
relationship with each other. (Fill in the blank)
Q.14: Mention the different impact of social change?
..................................................................................................................
5.7 LET US SUM UP
l Change is one of the most permanent laws of nature. Everything

changes with time. Nothing is permanent. All matters in the universe
go through a phase of transition, transformation or substitution,
including the society. A society has been under a constant change
since its inception.
Social Movements 95
Ans to Q No 3: The process of change of the society in different

variations which includes the social structure, social institutions,
social practices, social behaviors, social relations, traditions and
habits and etc. can be termed as the social change.
Ans to Q No 4: According to Gillin and Gillin, the variations in the
accepted way of life of the people in the society is social change.
The social change may take place due to the changes in the
geographical locations or the cultural elements and also due to
the composition of the population.
Ans to Q No 5: True
Ans to Q No 6: Culture
Ans to Q No 7: The term cultural lag refers to the notion that culture
takes time to catch up with technological innovations, and that
social problems and conflicts are caused by this lag.
Ans to Q No 8: The different factors of social change are the
demographic, natural, technological, cultural and economic
factor.
Ans to Q No 9: True
Ans to Q No 10: Time
Ans to Q No 11: The theories of social change include the Determination
Theory, Evolutionary Theory, Cyclical Theory, Economic Theory
and Religion Theory.
Ans to Q No 12: True
Ans to Q No 13: Revolution
Ans to Q No 14: Major impacts of social change include reform, revival,
revolution, and counter movements.

Q. 1 : It was mainly __________ who greatly contributed to the idea that
religion is solely responsible for bringing about a change in society.
(Fill in the blank)
Social Movements 97
Q. 2 : Human beings and the physical environment depend on each other.

(True/False)
Q. 3 : What is the difference between social movement and social change?
Q. 1 : Describe in brief any four factors of social change.
Q. 2 : Define social change.
Q. 3 : Describe in your own words any of the contemporary social
movement in the Indian society.
Q. 4 : What do you understand by counter movement?
C) Long Questions (Answer each question in about 300-500 words)
Q. 1 : Explain the different impacts of social change.
Q. 2 : Critically discuss the different factors of social change.
*** ***** ***
98 Social Movements
UNIT 6: MARXIST AND POST-MARXIST
THEORIES OF SOCIAL MOVEMENTS
UNIT STRUCTURE

6.2 Introduction
6.3 Marxist Theory of Social Movement
6.4 State and Societal Revolution in Capitalist Society
6.5 Post-Marxist Theory of Social Movement: Gramsci's
Perspective, Louis Althusser's Structural Perspective, Nicos
Poulantzas Perspective on Social Movement
6.6 Let Us Sum Up
6.7 Further Reading

l know about the Marxist Theory of Social Movement
l explain the State and Societal Revolution in Capitalist Society
l discuss the Post-Marxist Theory of Social Movement
6.2 INTRODUCTION
A social movement is basically a mass movement or can be regarded

as a collective effort of the people in order to bring a change or resist a
change. We have already learnt that change is inevitable. But, the changes
could be positive or negative for a society and its people. When there
prevails a negative change which contradicts the interest and welfare of
the masses people come together and try to change the existing order
through the means of social movement. The concept of social movement
has been theorized by many thinkers. This chapter therefore will provide
an effective insight to the Marxist Theory of social movement. Moreover, it
also deals in understanding some of the prominent post-Marxist theories.
Social Movements 99
Unit 6 Marxist and Post-Marxist Theories of Social Movements
6.3 MARXIST THEORY OF SOCIAL MOVEMENT
Marx was a famous German philosopher of nineteenth century. The

theories of Marx actually appeared at the middle of the nineteenth century
due to the oppressive conditions which prevailed in the society as a result
of the capitalism system. Coming to the main point, we must mention that
Karl Marx, did not specifically put forward a theory of social movement. His
analysis of the relationship between the have and have not in society that
existed in different phases of history produces the ideas which in turn also
substantiates concept to the problem of social movement. The left
revolutionary movements are all based on the ideas generated from
Marxism. In fact, there are so many elements present in the theories of
Marx that provides impetus towards social movements.
Marx borrowed from Hegel the concept of historical materialism

or what is known as materialistic interpretation of history. He applied this
concept to social and economic conditions of life. It became the basis of
his subsequent political philosophy. Marx believed that the character of a
man was formulated by the way in which he earned money. He believed
that the basis of the whole economic system was the system of production
and exchanges of products. It was a regular and continued process and
also a historical fact which could not be denied. According to him, matter
is the main element of the universe. It is something which gives shape to
the social institutions. This matter undergoes a dialectical process due to
the inherent tensions and the process continues until and unless a perfect
material condition is achieved or come into existence. Class conflict is
also another by product of this entire process.
Social change is the central analysis of the Marxian thought.

Marxist theory of social change is closely associated with class struggle,
which is deeply rooted in the economic structure of the society. In every
society which emerged during different phases of time, there are two
classes and the struggles and contradictions between them lead to social
change. During different phases of time, these two classes were known
by different names. But, there is a point which is common and this is the
100 Social Movements
Marxist and Post-Marxist Theories of Social Movements Unit 6
relationship between them i.e. of domination and exploitation. As Karl

Marx rightly remarked that ‘freeman and slave, patrician and plebian,
lord and serf, guild-master and journeyman, in a word, oppressor and
oppressed, stood in constant opposition to one another’.
Karl Marx always believed that history of the hitherto existing

struggle is nothing else but that of class struggle or class warfare. In this
class struggle, the poor are always fighting for their very existence. They
are not properly rewarded and are even not paid for the work which they
do. The rich are exploiting the poor by keeping with themselves what
should actually belong to the poor workers. This exploitation is not of
recent origin but is continuing since time immemorial. The poor are
struggling for their very existence in this world and this is bound to go as
long as the classes exist in this world. He further clarified that with the
development in the forces of production, one mode of production is being
replaced by another but the class conflict is not abolished. In fact, it again
reappears under the new social order. Therefore, the ancient slave owing
society was characterized by class conflict between the master and the
slave, the medieval feudal society by class conflict between the lord and
the serf, and the modern capitalist society by class conflict between the
capitalist and the proletariat.
Now, coming to the production part, production mode are

communally owned during primitive communism. Ancient slave-owning
society in which the means of production are owned by masters and labour
for production is done by the slaves. The medieval feudal society was one
in which the means of production are owned by feudal lords and labour for
production is done by serfs and the modern capitalist society in which the
means of production are owned by capitalists and labour for production is
done by the proletariat.
Marxism also viewed another factor which paved the way for social
movement- that is the ‘surplus value’. According to this concept, the working
classes are not paid as much as they produce but are paid for their very
existence so that they should work and always depend upon the capitalists.
Social Movements 101

The capitalists have a tendency to save something from the labour of every
labourers which they claim as their legitimate right or profit. This surplus of
labour makes the rich richer and the poor poorer. It is through this surplus
value that monopolistic tendencies develop and each capitalist tries to
capture either one market or the other on monopolistic lines. Marxism
provides a glaring example of exploitation of the workers under the capitalist
model of state and society.
Marx was of the opinion that with the passage of time small
capitalist will disappear as they shall not be in a position to compete with
the rich and shall become proletariat. Generally, the number of preliterate
will increase and the forces of production will be controlled by a few
capitalist on monopolistic basis. This monopoly will in turn create troubles
for the proletariat converting their life into a miserable one. In this condition,
the workers will have no alternative but to rise in revolt against the
capitalists. Marx believed that the rich will be crushed and the proletariat
will finally establish their rule. The rule of the proletariat however will not
disregard the interests of the rich but will always safeguard the poor as
well.
A classless society was the ultimate objective of Marxism. Karl Marx’s

ideal society was one in which there was neither class distinction nor disparity
between the rich and poor. It was a society in which all will get according to
their needs. He believed that since power corrupts man, the power could
also be misused by the proletariat. But, he was convinced that once the
means of production comes under the control of the working class, it could
safely be presumed that class distinction would disappear. This will build a
classless society. But, for this he insisted to carry forward the proletarian
revolution.
Marxist theory of social movement is an important element of the

dialectical materialism. According to the dialectical framework of analysis,
the development of the thesis and antithesis is always slow and steady.
But, the nature of the appearance of the synthesis is something sudden

due to the clash between the thesis and antithesis. No stage of historical
development would come to an end until it restrains the forces of
production. Therefore, before any particular change in any society, the
productive forces develop full. This something which the Marxist terms
as revolutionary change in which the entire structure of the society
transformed itself until a new society in its place is overthrown. Revolution
is therefore regarded as the midwife of social change in Marxist sense.
For any important social change, the epoch making is always the outcome
of a revolution.
CHECK YOUR PROGRESS
Q.1: Marx borrowed from Hegel the concept of

historical materialism or what is known as the
materialistic interpretation of history. (True/False)
.................................................................................................................
Q.2: A _____________ was the ultimate objective of Marx. (Fill in the
blank)
Q.3: Marx was of the opinion that with the passage of time small
capitalists will disappear as they shall not be in a position to compete
with the rich and shall become proletariat. Elucidate.
.................................................................................................................
Q.4: Briefly explain how Marxism has viewed 'surplus value' as the
factor which paves the way for social movement.
.................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
6.4 STATE AND SOCIETAL REVOLUTION IN

CAPITALIST SOCIETY
Marxism provides ample light on the nature of the State and how the
State in a capitalist society undergoes a societal revolution, what factors
are responsible for the revolution and what are the final goals of the
revolution.

Marxism view did not believe in the existence of State was from a
very long time. It believed that there was presence of societies in which
there was actually no State. It was only at a particular stage of history when
there was division created in the society. The people were divided between
two groups, the haves or the privileged and the have-nots or the non-
privileged. The State was then created in order to keep the interests of the
haves intact and to create conditions of dominance and exploitations for
the have nots. The state emerged as an organized body of power of the
privileged class. The State is therefore neither a natural nor an essential
body but, in the capitalist society, it was created intentionally and alienated
accordingly.
In the capitalist society, the State always serves as an instrument of
domination and coercion for the capitalist who is the main owner of the
forces of productions. The State is responsible for performing different
political, economic and ideological functions. But, these functions always
intended to benefit the capitalist. It uses its coercive and repressive power
through a mechanism of law, police and bureaucracy in order to resolve
any conflict that emerges between the capitalists and workers. It contains
the class struggle so that it does not make any harm to the capitalists.
Moreover, the State makes necessary arrangement to secure the property
interests of the capitalist. The economic policies of the State and all the
decisions that are made by the State are actually the decisions of the
capitalists who wanted to make their hold stronger by manipulating all the
legislations and laws in their favour. All the policies of the State governing
wages, prices, taxes, profits, trade unions, press, radio and television are
designed in such a way as to serve the interests and profits of the capitalists.
In other words, we can refer the State as the hand-maid of the capitalist in
a capitalist society. Marx viewed that the State maintains armies, prison,
and similar other institutions simply to protect and safeguard the rich or
ruling classes. The privileged classes of the past maintain their privilege
only through these arms of oppression and with the solid backing of the
State. The State in the capitalist society therefore works to exploit the poor.

However, as mentioned above, with the passage of time, the small

capitalists will disappear as they shall not be in a position to compete with
the rich and shall become proletariat. Generally, the number of preliterate
will increase and the whole forces of production will be controlled by a few
capitalist on monopolistic basis. This monopoly will in turn create troubles
for the proletariat converting their life into a miserable one. In this condition,
the workers will have no alternative but to rise in revolt against the capitalists.
Marx believed that the rich will be crushed and proletariat will finally establish
their rule. The rule of the proletariat however will not disregard the interests
of the rich but will always safeguard the poor as well. In other words, this is
the stage in which there would be a societal revolution in the capitalist
society.
The need for societal revolution is very much strong according to
Marxism because the present society and State can be changed only when
there would be a societal revolution which will throw away the existing system
of dominance and exploitation by the use of force and not by peaceful
means. Marx believes that when the proletariat will capture power from
the capitalists and the means of production will come under their control, a
new system of production will emerge The new society will hand over the
means of production to the community as a whole and not to any individual.
He believes that in the last phase of the revolution, the capitalists are bound
to be thrown out of power and the proletariat shall then capture authority. It
is then alone that a classless society will emerge and the existing class
distinction will disappear. When the proletariat will capture power, the means
of production will come in the hands of the working class and then there
shall be none to be exploited. It will be a society which will strive towards a
common welfare of the masses.
ACTIVITY 6.1
Try to list out and figure out whether the Indian society
has experienced any new form of such transformation
of the society in the past.

CHECK YOUR PROGRESS
Q.5: Marx did not believe that the State was

created to fulfill the interest of the capitalist class.
(True/False)
..................................................................................................................
Q.6: Marx believed that when the ___________ will capture power
from the capitalists and the means of production will come under
their control. (Fill in the blank)
Q.7: Briefly explain how Marx views social movements and their
emergence.
..................................................................................................................
Q.8: What is the nature of the State according to Marx?
..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
6.5 POST-MARXIST THEORIES OF SOCIAL

MOVEMENT
Marxist Theories have provided a view on social movement by

focusing on two contradicting social class, the capitalist and workers.
However, there emerged post-Marxist theories which reinterpreted the ideas
and provided new vision to social movement. Some of the prominent thinkers
who fall under the category are Antonia Gramsci, Louis Atthusser, and
Nicos Poulantzas.
l Antonio Gramsci:
Gramsci (1891-1937) was an Italian Marxist. He was the one who

reinterpreted Marxism. He revised the strategy of entire strategy of the
socialist revolution and provided an alternative one, which according to
him is more appropriate. Through his theory, he builds an important
connection between Classical Marxism and Neo-Marxism. He dealt in a
deep analysis of the capitalist society. It must be noted here that he was
an adherent supporter of the Russian Revolution but he was at the same

time critical of the approach of the movement initiated by the communist

party of Italy. He was very much vocal with his thoughts for which he was
even considered a threat to his authority. He was put under prison in
1926 and died finally in 1937. During his last days at prison, he did
remarkable works which were later published after his death as the Prison
Notebooks.
Gramsci through his political thought tried to convince the Marxists

that mere focusing on the economic domain to understand the problems of
society is a half served approach. He wanted the Marxist to come out from
the confinement of the analysis of the economic sphere and continue their
ideological warfare in the field of culture, art, and literature and philosophical
questions. The revolutionaries must break into the autonomous institutions
like the civil society. This will help them to create an atmosphere where
there would prevail new mass consciousness which will be informed by the
socialist value system. Moreover, Gramsci was also opposed to any form
of dictatorship either of the bourgeoisie or the proletariat. He did not support
the idea of using social revolution as a tool to establish a State which is
based on coercive forces, rather he wanted to democratize all the institutions
of the society and State. This can be done, according to Gramsci when the
State will be regulated by the society and where the decision making would
be based on consensus. He strived towards inculcating socialist values in
the minds of the people.
According to him, hegemony prevents the society from thinking freely

and makes life and thoughts homogeneous. This is done through structures
of domination in the culture of the capitalist society. According to him, the
civil society, prescribes certain rules of behaviour and asked the people to
follow the authority or commands of the ruling class. This structure is
misused by the capitalist and makes it work for their own interest. Therefore,
at the time of any injustice in the society and its people, impression of
justice prevails due to the presence of the structures. Therefore, hegemony
as regarded by Gramsci as the condition in which power is exercised with
the consent of its subject.

l Louis Althusser:
In order to understand Louis Althusser’s structural perspective of

social movement, first we need to understand what neo-Marxism is. Basically
neo-Marxism is not a static doctrine, it is concerned with different issues
which includes humanism, structuralism, existentialism, inequality of status
and power, psycho-analysis, and economic imperialism. It is a study which
is based on the fundamental principles of Marxism but also tends to move
towards new aspects. It does not limit itself to just class conflict between
the capitalist and workers on economic issues but also try to understand
the nature of dominance of the ruling class over the ruled class or dependent
class. Some of the neo-Marxist support Hegel’s interpretation of alienation
and dialect or dialectic. Whereas some have departed from Hegel and
have associated with existentialism or structuralism.
In the neo-Marxist theory, it is Louis Althusser (1918-80) who is the

chief advocate of structuralism. Althusser, was a French Philosopher who
provided an idea that the nature and form of any entity or actions of any
human being are determined by their underlying structures. The main aim
of the structural approach is to identify the structures which are basically
hidden and remain underneath. Examples are language, behaviour, culture
and psychology. But, these structures have a large influence on human
beings thus determining the nature of dominance. Althusser therefore, put
forwarded a new idea of interdependence of base and superstructure. He
advocated that for social revolution, the base is not all the time necessary.
Revolution can be started from any part of superstructure and then it will
spread slowly to other parts of the superstructure as well as to the base.
For example, revolution can be started from literature, folklore, mass media,
religion and then it will be spread to legal and political structures, morals,
social practices and economic structures.
l Nicos Poulantzas:
Poulantzas (1936-1979) was a Greek-French philosopher and

sociologist. He was an ardent supporter of Marxist principles and was a
well-known figure next to Louis Althusser. He was popularly recognized as

a structural Marxist too. He was famous for his work on the State and
Marxist analysis of fascism and social class of the contemporary world
system. Through his ideas, he had also provided deep insight to the study
of social movement.
The theory of the State is significant. According to the instrumental

Marxists, the State is nothing but an instrument which is owned by a particular
class and which uses it for their own interests. But, this particular idea of
State being a mere instrument is rejected by him. He believed that the capitalist
class narrowly focuses on short-term profit and do not indulge in maintaining
the power of a class as a whole. But, Poulantzas argued that the State is an
autonomous body and free from the influences of the capitalist class but still
the State ensures the smooth operation of the capitalist society, and as a
result, it benefits or serves the interests of the capitalists’ class. He further
strived that the State must always take into consideration the interest of the
oppressed class. And according to him, it is done by making class alliances,
where the dominating class associate themselves with the oppressed class
and this itself is necessary for the existence of capitalism. Poulantzas strongly
believed that if such an alliance is not established then attempts are made to
suppress any opposing movements by the ruling class. Then, there could be
possibility of the outbreak of a socialist movement.
LET US KNOW
Neo-Marxism refers to some new trends in Marxist

theory which seek to review the conditions prevailing
in the contemporary world in the light of relevant tenets
of Marxism. Neo-Marxism may be distinguished from the Classical
Marxism or Orthodox Marxism as it does not subscribe to Economic
Determinism, nor confines its attention to securing economic welfare
of people. It undertakes an analysis of the subtle methods of
dominance and dependence at various levels of contemporary
society- such as economic, sociological, political, cultural, and
psychological levels and strives to work out the way of human
emancipation.

CHECK YOUR PROGRESS
Q.9: Gramsci established a connection between

Classical Marxism and Neo-Marxism. (True/False)
..................................................................................................................
Q. 10: In the neo-Marxist theory, it is ____________ who is the chief
advocate of structuralism. (Fill in the blank)
Q. 11: What is the main argument of Poulantzas regarding the State?
..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
6.6 LET US SUM UP
l A social movement is basically a mass movement or can be regarded

as a collective effort of the people in order to bring a change or resist
a change. The changes may be positive or negative for a society and
its people. When there prevails a negative change which contradict
the interest and welfare of the masses, people come together and try
to change the existing order through the means of social movement.
l Marx was a famous German philosopher of the nineteenth century.

The theories of Marx actually appeared at the middle of the nineteenth
century due to the oppressive conditions which prevailed in the society
as a result of the capitalist system.
l Marx borrowed from Hegel the concept of historical materialism or

what is known as materialistic interpretation of history. He applied this
concept to social and economic conditions of life. It became the basis
of his subsequent political philosophy.
l Karl Marx always believed that history of the hitherto existing struggle
is nothing else but that of class struggle or class warfare. In this class
struggle, the poor are always fighting for their very existence. The rich
are exploiting the poor by keeping with themselves what should actually

belong to the poor workers. This exploitation is not of recent origin but
is continuing since time immemorial.
l A classless society was the ultimate objective of Marx. Karl Marx’s
ideal society was one in which there was neither class distinction nor
disparity between the rich and poor. It was a society in which all will
get according to their needs.
l Marx provides ample light on the nature of the State and how the State
in a capitalist society undergoes a societal revolution, what factors are
responsible for the revolution and what are the final goals of the
revolution.
l In the capitalist society, the State always serves as an instrument of
domination and coercion for the capitalist who is the main owner of
the forces of productions. The State is responsible for performing
different political, economic and ideological functions. But, these
functions are always intended to benefit the capitalist.
l The need for societal revolution is very much strong according to Marx
because the present society and State can be changed only when
there would be a societal revolution which will throw away the existing
system of dominance and exploitation by the use of force and not by
peaceful means.
l Marxist Theories have provided a view on social movement by focusing
on two contradicting social class, the capitalist and workers.
l Many post-Marxist theories reinterpreted the ideas of Marx and
provided new vision to social movement. Some of the prominent
thinkers who fall under the category are- Antonia Gramsci, Louis
Atthusser, and Nicos Poulantzas.
6.7 FURTHER READING
1) Barker, C., Laurence C., John, K. and Ali, G.N. (2013). Marxism and
social movements. Leiden: Brill Press.
2) Therborn, G. (2010). From Marxism to post-Marxism. London: Verso.
Ans to Q No 2: Classless society.
Ans to Q No 3: According to Marx, the number of preliterate will
increase and the whole forces of production will be controlled by
a few capitalist on monopolistic basis. This monopoly will in turn
create troubles for the proletariat converting their life into a
miserable one. In this condition, the workers will have no
alternative but to rise in revolt against capitalists. Thus, Marx
believed that the rich will be crushed and proletariat will finally
establish their rule.
Ans to Q No 4: According to this concept, the working classes are not
paid as much as they produce but are paid for their very existence
so that they should work and always depend upon the capitalists.
The capitalists have a tendency to save something from the
labour of every labourers which they claim as their legitimate
right or profit. This surplus of labour makes the rich richer and
the poor poorer. It is through this surplus value that monopolistic
tendencies develop and each capitalist tries to capture either
one market or the other on monopolistic lines.
Ans to Q No 5: False.
Ans to Q No 6: Proletariat.
Ans to Q No 7: The need for societal revolution is very much strong
according to Marx because the present society and State can
be changed only when there would be a societal revolution which
will throw away the existing system of dominance and exploitation
by the use of force and not by peaceful means. Marx believes
that when the proletariat will capture power from the capitalists
and the means of production will come under their control, a
new system of production will emerge The new society will hand
over the means of production to the community as a whole and

not to any individual. He believes that in the last phase of the
revolution, capitalists are bound to be thrown out of power and
the proletariat shall then capture authority. It is then alone that a
classless society will emerge and the existing class distinction
will disappear.
Ans to Q No 8: In the capitalist society, the State always serves as an
instrument of domination and coercion for the capitalist who is
the main owner of the forces of productions. The State is
responsible for performing different political, economic and
ideological functions. But, these functions are always intended
to benefit the capitalist.
Ans to Q No 10: Louis Althusser.
Ans to Q No 11: Poulantzas argued that the State is an autonomous body
and free from the influences of the capitalist class but still the
State ensures the smooth operation of the capitalist society, and
as a result, it benefits or serves the interests of the capitalists’
class.

Q. 1 : According to __________ Marxist, the State is nothing but an
instrument which is owned by a particular class and uses it for their
own interests. (Fill in the blank)
Q. 2 : Karl Marx always believed that the history of hitherto existing struggle
is nothing else but that of class struggle or class warfare. (True/
False)
Q. 3 : What is the difference between Marxism and neo-Marxism?
Q. 1 : Describe in brief the Marxist Theory of Social Movement.
Q. 2 : Explain the State and societal revolution in a capitalist society.

Q. 3 : Describe in your own words whether the post-Marxist theories are
justified in their arguments.
Q. 1 : Explain the perspectives of Gramsci and Althusser towards social
movement.
Q. 2 : Critically discuss the Marxist as well as post-Marxist theories of
social movement.
*** ***** ***

UNIT 7: WEBERIAN THEORY OF SOCIAL ACTION
UNIT STRUCTURE

7.2 Introduction
7.3 Theory of Social Action
7.4 Types of Social Action
7.5 Features of Social Action
7.6 Let Us Sum Up
7.7 Further Reading

l understand the theory of social action
l analyse the features and types of social action
l understand the concept of 'ideal type'
l analyse the contribution of Max Weber to sociological theory.
7.2 INTRODUCTION
Max Weber, a German sociologist, is regarded as one of the founders

of modern sociology. Weber focused on the basic features of a modern
industrial society. Largely known for his views on ideal types and on religion
and protestant ethics, Weber also scrutinizes the issue of social action.
Weber conceived of sociology as the science with the task of “the interpretive
understanding of social action in order thereby to arrive at a causal
explanation of its course and effects.”1 For Weber the concept of ‘social
action’ was the “central subject matter” of his sociology.2 As you finish reading
the unit, you will be able to discuss the different aspects of Weberian theory
of social action.

Unit 7 Weberian Theory of Social Action
7.3 THEORY OF SOCIAL ACTION
According to Weber, human behaviour is qualitatively very different

from other biological organisms. The question is, what makes human
behaviour so different? What factors influence such behaviour? The answer
is probably the presence of meanings and motives that underlie social
behaviour.
The influence of ‘neo-Kantian’ ideas on Weber is well documented

and it largely influences his views on social life. Wagner and Harpfer note-
Weber developed a social science that is grounded in Neo-

Kantian premises and proceeds in either a generalizing or an
individualizing direction, depending on its scientific objective.
By individualizing, social science becomes a cultural science.
By generalizing, it becomes sociology, which is emancipated
from its roots in the philosophy of history.
Therefore, the objective of sociology is very different from the positive

sciences which seek to discover the patterns and uniformity of behaviour.
In social sciences, understanding the motives and meanings of social action
is very important. Explanation of any phenomenon will have to be linked
with human motives. According to Weber, Swedberg notes:
The social sciences, or as he called them the cultural sciences,

differ from the natural sciences on two crucial points. The first
is that they have to deal with something that the natural sciences
do not have to take into consideration, namely, that their objects
of study – human beings – have values and assign meaning to
what they do, and that this influences their actions.
Hence, the positivist methodology is not enough to study and analyse

human behaviour. It must be highlighted that Weber was not against
generalisations in social sciences, but he did point out that understanding
any social phenomenon is bound to be a complex issue for there are a
number of variables involved. Only limited generalisations can be made in
social sciences.

Weberian Theory of Social Action Unit 7
The influence of society and its structures on shaping the behaviour

of individuals is well documented through the writings of Durkheim and
Marx. While most of Weber’s writing deal with structures such as religion,
authority and capitalism, he also emphasizes the actions of the individuals
and social interaction among individuals and groups.
Thus, according to Weber, “Social action is that action of an individual

which is influenced by the actions and behaviour of other persons and by
which its direction determined.” In other words, it is somehow influenced,
guided or determined by the actions of other individuals.
CHECK YOUR PROGRESS
Q.1: What is social action?

.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
Q.2: What is the objective of sociology?
.................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
7.4 TYPES OF SOCIAL ACTION
Action is “social” in so far as its subjective meaning takes account

of the behaviour of others and is thereby oriented in its course.1 Social
action had two important components. Firstly, every action taken by an
individual has a reason attached to it. Therefore, it is important to
understand the meaning associated with every such action. Secondly,
social action is not something which is random or unplanned. Rather,
over a period of time, certain actions and interactions become patterned
behaviour. There are regularities involved in social action, which in turn
become associated with laws and customs. Therefore, a sociologist must
understand the factors which contribute to such patterned behaviour and
meanings individuals attach to them. Cohen, Ira J., “Theories of Action
and Praxis” in Bryan S. Turner, The Blackwell Companion to Social Theory,
reflects upon the book Economy and Society, wherein Weber argued

that every social action has three important aspects- Firstly, there is a
‘subjective meaning’, wherein all aspects of the social world must be
considered from the actor’s point of view. Cohen further substantiates
that for Weber, ‘inanimate objects, birth and death, and the environment
may be considered constants and nothing more than elements of a
material world,’ but these are interpreted by individuals differently at various
times and places. Secondly, social relationships where there is plurality
of actors matter. Social action may be individual acts, but it can only be
meaningful in nature if ‘social relationships’ is considered. Plurality of
actors will mean that every social action is bound to be interpreted in
different ways leading to agreements and disagreements. Thirdly, in the
long run, social relationships are ‘stable’. Longevity of social relationships
will depend upon the results that are being met through regular social
actions. Its longevity helps in the continuity of traditions besides
consolidating social institutions. Norms and rules get strengthened through
the longevity of social relationships.
Ideal type
Weber advanced the verstehen method of analysis to understand

any social behaviour; ‘it is a methodological tool to explain not all behaviour,
but behaviour which is of a social nature.’ While explaining social action,
this method gives importance to ‘meanings’ and ‘sequence of motives’.
Social reality is rather complex which cannot be comprehended by the
human mind in totality. Therefore, the issue of ‘ideal types’ becomes very
important in explaining social reality. For Weber, ‘an ideal type is not a
“schema” into which reality should be fitted as a “specimen”. Rather, it “has
the status of a purely ideal limiting concept against which reality is measured
– with which it is compared”’. ‘Ideal types’ is a social construct which is
equivalent to experimentation in natural and physical sciences. Cahnman
points out that –
‘the ideal type, then, is not a description of concrete reality,

or even of the essential features of such a ; it is not a hypothesis;
it is not a schema under which a real situation, or action, is

subsumed as one instance; it is not a generic concept or a

statistical average. Rather, it is “an ideal limiting concept with
which the real situation or action, is compared,” so that it may
be properly appraised in line with the categories of “objective
possibility” and “adequate causation.”’
Swedberg highlights that Weber’s model of ‘ideal types’ helps explain

reality in different ways-
l It allows the social scientist to take a first step in the analysis of a

topic that is little known or explored. The ideal type may function as
an “emergency safe havens until one has learned to find one’s
bearings while navigating the immense sea of empirical facts” .
l It helps the social scientist to get a better handle on empirical reality,

and this is done primarily through a comparison of reality with the
ideal type.
l When such a comparison is made, the social scientist may also make
discoveries. Weber repeatedly says that the use of the ideal type is
heuristic, and that this constitutes the most important reason for using
this kind of concept.
Social action is different from behaviour. According to Weber,

sociology is a comprehensive science of social action and he used his
ideal type methodology to elucidate the meaning of ‘action’. According
to Max Weber, ”An Action is ‘social’ if the acting individual takes account
of the behaviour of others and is thereby oriented in its course”. In order
to qualify for any action to be social, presence of meanings and existence
of other individuals is imperative. A social act cannot be an isolated act or
be done in isolation. Essentially, in society what exists is a chain of
reciprocal social actions. Such social actions can be classified into four
major types-
Types of action Description
Goal rational action When individuals pursue specific goals which are decided
rationally and efficient means are used to achieve the same, it is
known as 'goal oriented action'.

Types of action Description
Value rational action Sometimes, individuals seek goals which may not be rational, but
may be pursued through rational means; such social actions are
known as value rational action.
Traditional action Customary action constitutes traditional action. There is continuity
of behaviour based on the traditions and norms of the society and
community.
Affective action Sometimes, human behaviour is very much determined by
particular situations. At times, such behaviour is very much
emotionally expressed, it expresses the emotional state of the

individual.
Christian Etzrodt in his article ‘Advanced Modern Versions of Max Weber’s Action Concepts’ (2005)
neat identifies the key features of different types of social action.4
An action is instrumentally rational if the actor is evaluating different

anticipated alternative results of possible actions and chooses the best of
these alternatives. The evaluation of the alternatives is based on a judgment
of the desired positive results minus the undesired secondary results, and
all alternatives are compared simultaneously. And the choice of a specific
action depends on its usefulness or its utility. Therefore, the value is in this
action type, the end or result of the action. Instrumentally, rational social
action is not only oriented to objects but also to the expected reactions of
other actors to the performed act.
Value-rational action is on the other hand, for Max Weber, an action
which is motivated by values that are not equivalent to the ends or results
of actions. The reason for their performance “does not lie in the achievement
of a result ulterior to it, but in carrying out the specific type of action for its
own sake”.
Affectual behaviour is therefore characterized by a utility-based
evaluation of the ends or results of the behaviour but without a completely
rational simultaneous selection procedure. Affectual behaviour can therefore
be differentiated from instrumentally rational action, because of its chaotic
nature based on a sequential selection procedure instead of a simultaneous
selection mechanism. And affectual social action can be demarcated from
instrumentally rational action, because of its altruistic criterion of evaluating

the alternatives instead of an egoistic criterion which modulates the strong

emotional bonds between the actors.
For Weber, traditional behaviour is no longer a reasonable or
meaningful action, because it is carried out automatically as a habitual
reflex to a known stimulus. Traditional behaviour is as a result not a less
“meaningful” behaviour as Weber stated. It is in contrast to the original
type of meaningful action, because of its reliance on the traditional meaning
structure, especially understandable.
Weber focuses on the patterns and regularities of individual action
and rather than on collective behaviour. He was however well aware that
any social action may involve a combination of all or any of the four ideal
types of action.
l Weber’s contribution to Symbolic Interaction
Sociologists trace the theoretical roots of the interactionist perspective
in Max Weber, who in his book The Protestant Ethic and Spirit of Capitalism
highlighted that individuals act according to their interpretation of the
meaning of their world. Developed by in the latter half of the 19th century by
the Chicago School, symbolic interactionism is a theoretical approach that
sought to understand the relationship between humans and society and
emphasized the importance of individual motives and their actions in
understand social behaviour. According to this perspective, ‘society and
these larger social structures must be understood through studying social
interactions that are based on shared understandings, languages, and
symbols.’5 Denzin points out that-
The term “symbolic” in the phrase symbolic interaction
refers to the underlying linguistic foundations of human group
life, just as the word “interaction” refers to the fact that people
do not act toward one another, but interact with each other. By
using the term “interaction” symbolic interactionists commit
themselves to the study and analysis of the developmental
course of action that occurs when two or more persons (or
agents) with agency (reflexivity) join their individual lines of
action together into joint action.
This school emphasized that symbols play an important role in

understanding social relationships. Symbols convey meanings, motives
and attitude of an individual towards others.
Symbolic Interactionism
Key people Key works Main ideas
W.I.Thomas The Polish Peasants Thomas and Znaniecki explored the relationship
and Znaniecki in Europe and between individuals and society, focusing on
America (1918) groups such as families and neighborhoods, and
community ties, which they believed were key

to social change. They argued that 'under the
impulse of industrialisation processes in Poland
and emigration to the United States- peasants

were increasingly becoming economically
rational workers and drifting away from
traditional modes of social organisation and

behaviour.6
Mead explains that the 'individual is also a

G.H.Mead Mind, Self and
subject, not merely an object. The self, then,
Society (1934)
consists of an internalization of an overt
obstructed social process, and it mediates

between the old and the new, between the
traditional and the newly initiated, between the
past and the demands of a future, or between

an ideology and a utopia'.7
'The first premise is that human beings act

Herbert Blumer Symbolic Interaction:
toward things on the basis of the meanings that
Perspective and
the things have for them…. The second premise
Method (1969)
is that the meaning of such things is derived
from, or arises out of, the social interaction that

one has with one's fellows. The third premise is
that these meanings are handled in, and
modified through, an interpretative process used

by the person in dealing with the things he
8
encounters.'
Herbert Blumer argues that symbolic interactionism rests on three

important premises-
1. Human beings act towards things on the basis of the meanings that
the things have for them;
2. Meanings of such things derive from the social interaction that one
has with one’s fellows;
3. Meanings are handled in, modified through, an interactive process
used by the person in dealing with things he encounters.9
According to Carter and Fuller, the basic tenets of symbolic
interactionism would state that:
l individuals act based on the meanings objects have for them;
l interaction occurs within a particular social and cultural context in
which physical and social objects (persons), as well as situations,
must be defined or categorized based on individual meanings;
l meanings emerge from interactions with other individuals and with

society; and
l meanings are continuously created and recreated through the

interpreting processes during interaction with others.
l Acts Explained
Hewitt examines the different phases of a social act as identified

by G.H. Mead who meant to call attention to the interplay between the
internal processes and external manifestations exhibited in human
behaviour. The individual’s act does not consist merely of what may be
observed by others, but also entails an internal process of control in
which the individual directs conduct toward some goal or object.10
Basic Concepts of Symbolic Interactionism-Phases of the social acts
Impulse An act starts with an impulse, which occurs when our existing adjustment or
line of activity is disturbed. In other words, we might simply suggest that an
act begins with a problem to be solved, a goal to be reached, something to be
overcome by the human being in the environment.
Perception Here, we begin to name or designate objects and thus give our acts direction.
The important point that must not be lost is that human beings define their
situations. This is the second stage of the act.
Manipulation At this stage, we take concrete steps to reach our goal.
Consummation Finally, the act ends with consummation, when our original adjustment or line
of activity is restored.
John Hewitt, Self & Society, 9th Edition, Allyn & Bacon, 2002.

l Implications and Conclusions
Fararo argues that ‘for sociology, the events of interest are

those that involve complexes of social actions. These events are
behaviours with subjective meaning, thereby calling for interpretive
understanding in order to provide causal explanations.11 Weber’s
aim was to analyse the meanings and motives of individual
behaviour. By clearly identifying different types of ideal types of
social action, Weber thought that sociology as a subject could
understand social action during particular historical periods as well
as in contemporary times. While Weber focused his attention on
individual behaviour, he was well aware that norms, rules and
traditions play an important role in shaping social actions. Weber
sought to explain how social structures are rooted in individual social
action. This interpretive sociology led to research methods like
participant observation, ethnography studies and phenomenological
analysis.
Wolfgang J. Mommsen has highlighted that by the 1970S there

was sudden revival in Max Weber studies. His contribution to
sociology and beyond can be identified by the fact that the following
avenues of inquiry in and beyond are being pursued:
l research into his ideal typical reconstruction of Western history

and the process of rationalization;
l research into the relationship between religious attitudes, social

conduct and economic activities in both Western and non-
Western cultures;
l concept of social change and the dichotomy of value-oriented

and instrumental social action which is closely linked to problem
of formal and substantive rationality;
l Weber’s contribution to the study of history and his theory of

politics and legitimacy, which attaches priority to the question
of how individual freedom can survive in modern bureaucratic
societies, whether capitalist or socialist.12
Weber’s contribution to sociological theory and interpretive analysis
has been well summed up by Patrick Gunn, who pointed out that ‘interpretive
understanding, interpretive sociology, and other modern forms of ‘Verstehen’
have allowed all of the social sciences to move away from positivist,
determinist endeavors—all of which have fallen flat in social and behavioural
science—and toward a more nuanced, humanized form of study.13
CHECK YOUR PROGRESS
Q.3: What is 'affectual behaviour'?

..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
Q.4: Name two major works of Max Weber.
..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
Q.5: What is 'symbolic interactionism'?
..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
7.5 FEATURES OF SOCIAL ACTION
From the analysis of the Weberian theory of social action, the following
features can be mentioned:
l Social action occur among individuals. It is possible only in the

society. In other words, social action cannot occur in isolation.
l Subjective attitudes constitute social action only so far as they are

oriented to the behaviour of others.
l Social action may be influenced by an act of past, present or future.

It is the result or modification of some actions of some other individual
but the modifying action may be occur in the past, present or future.
l Not every type of contact of human beings has a social character;

this is rather confined to cases where the actor’s behaviour is
meaningfully oriented to that of others.

l Social action should have subjective meaning to another particular

social action. For example, if two persons collide accidentally and
without any motive, the collision will not be a social action. So,
sociology is the study of social action and human behaviour which
studies not only the behaviour but meaning. Thus, social action is
the new name of sociology.
l Social action is that action of an individual which is influenced by the

actions and behaviour of other persons and by which its direction
determined. In other words, it is somehow influenced, guided or
determined by the actions of other individuals.
l Social action is not identical either with the similar actions of many
persons or with every action influenced by other persons.14
Ø Concept of Verstehen
According to Weber, “interpretative sociology considers the

individual and his actions as the basic social unit,” and he felt that the
task of sociology was “to reduce [certain categories of human
interaction] to ‘understandable’ action.”15 ‘Verstehen’ was originally
developed by Wilhelm Dilthey and Georg Simmel as the method of
‘Geisteswissenschaften’( i.e. humanities, which encompass
philosophy, (art) history, philologies, musicology and religious studies)
. According to Dilthey, ‘Verstehen’ explains the psychological reality
of the individual, the ultimate basis of all human actions. While Dilthey
and Simmel maintained that social actions must be understood in
terms of the ‘inner-motives’ of the acting individuals, Weber defined
‘Verstehen’ as a method of empirical science which attempts to
understand the ’meaning’ of action, not the motives of acting
individuals. 16 Weber argued that the sociologists should use
‘Verstehen’ (“to grasp by insight”) in order to see beyond the social
facts to the subjective meanings that people attach to their own
behaviour.17

CHECK YOUR PROGRESS
Q.6: What is the meaning of ‘Verstehen’?

..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
Q. 7: What is interpretive sociology?
..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
7.6 LET US SUM UP
l The concept of 'social action' was the "central subject matter" of

Weber's sociology.
l Most of Weber's writing deal with structures such as religion, authority
and capitalism. He also emphasizes actions of the individuals and
social interaction among individuals and groups.
l According to Weber, "interpretative sociology considers the individual
and his actions as the basic social unit," and he felt that the task of
sociology was "to reduce [certain categories of human interaction] to
'understandable' action."
l Weber defined 'Verstehen' as a method of empirical science which
attempts to understand the 'meaning' of action, not the motives of
acting individuals.
l Weber focuses on the patterns and regularities of individual action
rather than on collective behaviour. He was however well aware that
any social action may involve a combination of all or any of the four
ideal types of action.
l Weber's aim was to analyse the meaning and motives of individual
behaviour. By clearly identifying different types of ideal types of social
action, Weber thought that sociology as a subject could understand
social action during particular historical periods as well as in
contemporary times.

society and emphasized the importance of individual motives

and their actions in understand social behaviour.
Ans to Q No 6: 'Verstehen' as a method of empirical science attempts
to understand the' meaning' of action'. Weber argued that the
sociologists should use 'Verstehen' ("to grasp by insight") in order
to see beyond the social facts to the subjective meanings that
people attach to their own behaviour.
Ans to Q No 7: According to Weber, "interpretative sociology considers
the individual and his actions as the basic social unit".

Q. 1 : Mention two features of social action.
Q. 2 : For Weber, the concept of _____ _____ was the central subject
matter of his sociology. (Fill in the blanks)
Q. 1 : What are the different types of social action?
Q. 2 : Briefly explain the concept of 'Verstehen'.

Q. 1 : Discuss weber's contribution to symbolic interactionism.
Q. 2 : Discuss the concept of 'ideal type'.
Q. 3 : Discuss Max Weber's theory of social action.
End notes:
1
W. T. Tucker, ‘Max Weber’s Verstehen’ , The Sociological Quarterly, 6(2), 1965, pp.157–165.
2
Rob Stones, Theories of Social Action, Edited by Bryan S. Turner, The New Blackwell
Companion To Social Theory, 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, USA, p.83.

3
Craig Calhoun, Joseph Gerteis, James Moody, Steven Pfaff and Indermohan Virk, Classical
Sociological Theory, Blackwell Publishing, 2007, p. 218.
4
For more details see Christian Etzrodt, Advanced Modern Versions of Max Weber’s Action
Concepts, Ritsumeikan Social Sciences Review , 2005.

5
Kathy S. Stolley, The Basics of Sociology, Greenwood Press, Westport, 2005, p.28.
6
Giulia Sinatti, The Polish Peasant Revisited. Thomas and Znaniecki’s Classic in the Light of
Contemporary Transnational Migration Theory, Acta Sociologica 2(2) · February 2008, p.1.
7
D. L. Miller, ‘George Herbert Mead: Symbolic Interaction and Social Change’, The Psychological
Record, 23(3),1973, p.303.

8
Herbert Blumer, Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method, Prentice Hall, New Jersey
1969, p. 2.
9
ibid. p.2.
10
John Hewitt, Self & Society, 9th Edition, Allyn & Bacon, 2002.
11
Thomas J. Fararo, Social action systems : foundation and synthesis in sociological theory, Praeger
Publishers,USA, 2002, p.49

12
Wolfgang J. Mommsen, The Political and Social Theory of Max Weber, University of Chicago
Press, 1989, p.194

13
Patrick Gann, ‘An Explication and Application of Max Weber’s Theoretical Construct of
Verstehen’, Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics, Volume 14, Number 2 (2017) , p.33
14
Craig Calhoun, Joseph Gerteis, James Moody, Steven Pfaff and Indermohan Virk, Classical
Sociological Theory, Blackwell Publishing, 2007, p. 218-228.

15
W. T. Tucker, ‘Max Weber’s Verstehen’, The Sociological Quarterly, 6(2), 1965, p.157.
16
S. Herva,‘The Genesis of Max Weber’s Verstehende Soziologie’, Acta Sociologica, 31(2),1988,
p.143.
17
The sociological perspective, available at http://www.csun.edu/~hbsoc126/soc1/
chapter%201%20outline.pdf, accessed on 18.9.2019.
*** ***** ***

UNIT 8: TALCOTT PARSONS' THEORY OF
SOCIAL ACTION
UNIT STRUCTURE

8.2 Introduction
8.3 Talcott Parsons' Structural-Functionalism
8.4 Parsons' Theory of Social Action
8.5 Let Us Sum Up
8.6 Further Reading
8.7. Answers to Check Your Progress

l understand the concept of social action
l comprehend the concept of structural functionalism forwarded
by Parsons
l understand the concept of AGIL.
8.2 INTRODUCTION
Talcott Parsons (1902-1979), born in Colorado Springs (Colorado),

became an instructor in Harvard University in 1927. He is considered to be
one of foremost contributors to the development of sociological theory. By
the 1960s, Parsons had become the dominant figure in American sociology.
Often labeled as a 'grand theorist' his major works include- The Structure
of Social Action (1937) The Social System (1951) and Towards a General
Theory of Action (1951). He was greatly influenced by Max weber, Emile
Durkheim, W. Pareto and Alfred Marshal. Parsons sought to build an
'ecology of sociology' wherein a general theoretical structure for sociology
would integrate all the social sciences. Parsons concluded that ideas
represent only particle truth and there is a need for a more holistic
understanding of a phenomenon.
Unit 8 Talcott Parsons’ Theory of Social Action
8.3 TALCOTT PARSONS' STRUCTURAL

FUNCTIONALISM
Talcott Parsons’ work The Structure of Social Action serves as the

basic reference point of all his subsequent theoretical works. Employing
the method of ‘analytical realism’, wherein ‘the scientist commits himself to
developing “systems of concepts” that ‘adequately grasp’ the central
features of the world, Parsons elaborates on the issues of structures,
functions and the need for equilibrium.1 Kevin Dew in The Wiley Blackwell
Encyclopedia of Health, Illness, Behavior, and Society (2014) highlights
that ‘a structural functionalist approach represents society as a system
consisting of various subsystems.’ Effectively, this theory focuses on two
important things-‘functions’ and ‘structures’. By “functions,” theorists in the
perspective generally mean consequences that benefit society as a whole,
contribute to its operation, or increase its stability. “Structure,” in its broadest
sense, can refer to social arrangements ‘such as stratification systems
therefore are social structures, as are social institutions such as marriage’.
According to the structural function, social systems are composed of
interconnected parts. This theory argues that a society is a complex entity
wherein different parts play an intricate role. The smoothness of functioning
and greater coordination between the interdependent parts will lead to
increased stability. The importance of various parts of a system can be
analysed in terms of how each contributes to meeting the needs of the
whole, thereby maintain stability and equilibrium. Any change in any part of
the system will greatly affect the working of the system.
Why are there variations in cultural patterns? The answer to this

question lies in the functioning of the system. Cultural patterns consist of
norms, customs, traditions and institutions, and each of them play a key
role in shaping individual as well as collective behaviour. Any disruption of
such pattern will have a major impact on the society. Therefore, how does
a system maintain itself or how is equilibrium maintained? This is what
structural functionalism tries to answer. Structural functionalism largely
argues that a society consists of structures and interrelated parts.
Talcott Parsons’ Theory of Social Action Unit 8
For Parsons, adoption of the structural functional approach was

required to understand social reality. It must be recalled that Durkheim,
through his concept of ‘social facts’, and later on Radcliffe -Brown had
stretched upon this idea. Robert Merton also argues about functionalism
through the concepts of power and coercion. For Parsons, the social system
consists of actions of individuals. Social behaviour is about choices, and
while responding to an act by another person, an individual is influenced
as well as constrained by physical and cultural factors.
Allan in his book The Social Lens: An Invitation to Social and
Sociological Theory (2007) points out that there are sanctions attached to
our behaviour and social interaction are guided by certain motivations and
values which impose certain role expectations on the individual concerned.
Therefore, each person acts according to acceptable norms which they
inhabit. As behaviour gets repeated, it becomes institutionalized, and a
role is created. Thus, the role of a person emerges through a social
interaction process, but that individual is expected to conform to certain
norms governing their roles. If every person fulfills their roles and
expectations are consistently met, it is the state of equilibrium. Therefore,
socialization and social control become very important. Adaptation to new
roles is possible through ‘role bargaining’, which then creates new norms
and it guides social action. Thus, Talcott Parsons constructed a theory of
social action which argued that individual action is rooted in the norms of
society and constrained by its values.
l AGIL model
Talcott Parsons believed that just like human beings, who perform
certain functions to survive, society too has to perform certain things
in order to function properly. The issue of maintenance of equilibrium
depends on many factors. Change in any one part of the system will
impact the other parts and subsequently affect stability and equilibrium
of the system. According to Parsons, social roles and cultural
expectations play an important part in influencing individual behaviour.
Relations are interactive because every action of the individual has
meanings and motivations attached to it.
In collaboration with Robert F. Bales and Edward A. Shils, Parsons

formulated the AGIL schema in the Working Papers in the Theory of Action
(1953). He argued that the system of action could be further broken down
into subsystems of action. The behavioural organism helps in adaptation
and transformation; the social system helps in integration; the personality
system helps in goal attainment; and the cultural system helps pattern
maintenance. Also known as the four function paradigm, Parsons believed
that there are four functional imperatives that are necessary for all systems
to survive.
l Adaptation (A) is an instrumental function by which a system adapts

to its external environment or adapts the external environment to the
system.
l Goal attainment (G) is a consummatory function that defines the

goals and ends of a system and mobilizes resources to attain them.
Goal attainment is generally oriented externally.
l Integration (I) is a consummatory function that manages the

interrelationships of the parts of a system. The integration function
maintains internal coherence and solidarity within the system.
l Latent pattern maintenance (L) is an instrumental function that

supplies all actors in the system with a source of motivation. It provides
normative patterns and manages the tensions of actors internal to
the system.
Effectively, ‘the four component parts or subsystems in the action

frame of reference—culture, society, personality, and behaviour/organic
energy— bring meaning to situations.’ While these subsystems are distinct
from one another, they help emphasise the fact that the system is an
interactive whole where very part plays an important role. In advanced
industrial societies, schools, courts, work place and families, all contribute
to the maintenance of stability of the system. Analysing Parsons theory,
Feuer and Black in their article The Social Theories of Talcott Parsons: A
Critical Examination (1962) have further elaborated that ‘every society, as
a social system, must, according to the Parsonians, solve these four basic
system problems through subsystems of special roles: the polity provides

the goal; the economy achieves the adaptation; and the integrative and
tension management subsystems resolve emotional conflicts.’ Furthermore,
elucidating Parsons ideas, Turner argues that ‘when actors from different
sectors—and in this case, from differentiated institutional domains like
economy, polity, law, family, and religion in the societal social system—
interact, they often exchange their symbolic medium for that of another
sector’.
‘Functions of Key Institutional Domains in a Societal Social System and Their Inter-
changes’ by Jonathan H. Turner, Theoretical Sociology: A Concise Introduction to Twelve
Sociological Theories, Sage 2014.

Highlighting Parsonian framework, Sharrock, Hughes and Martin in

their book Understanding Modern Sociology (2003) reflect that ‘the society
will have to be organised in ways that both sustain and disseminate its
main values throughout the sub-systems, so ensuring broad compatibility
between them, and in ways that articulate them with the practical
requirements of the various sub-systems themselves.1 The society as a
whole is centrally structured around a main set of ‘shared values’. Issues
of stability and cooperation are based on ‘value consensus’ that exists in a
society. The pursuit of certain goals and values is essential for every society.
Evaluating Parsons’ theory, T. Burger in the article Talcott Parsons, the
Problem of Order in Society, and the Program of an Analytical Sociology
(1977) highlights that ‘maintenance of equilibrium will be difficult because
there is constant production of new norms as well as values and also there
are is ‘variety and competition in the normative realm’. Effectively, all order
cannot be maintained through brute force alone, rather shared values and
‘value consensuses will go to play an important role in promoting stability
on the society.
CHECK YOUR PROGRESS
Q.1: What is 'function'?

.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
Q.2: What does AGIL stand for?
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
Q.3: What is 'value consensuses?
.................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
8.4 PARSONS' THEORY OF SOCIAL ACTION
Parsons’ central concern was to develop a comprehensive and coherent

conceptual scheme for sociology that could be applied to every society and
historical epoch and to address every aspect of human social organization.3

For Parsons, classical economic theory assumes that human beings are
rational and largely ignores the non-rational aspects of human behaviour.
Likewise, he thought that positivism ignores the subjective elements of human
action. While Parsons appreciated the efforts of the idealists for it attempted
to study human qualities, values and morals, the problem was that it also
explained issues of a society according to its uniqueness. Therefore,
generalization could not have been possible. For Parsons, sociological
theories must take into account the subjective dimensions but at the same
time, it should also be able to develop general laws.
1. Sociological theory should be an adequately general theory which

could be applied to different societies;
2. Sociological theory must be based on the ‘principle of emergence’,

i.e. systems emerge with certain properties which cannot be solely
explained through the interaction of its parts.
3. Based on voluntaristic principles, sociological theory must be an action

theory. Essentially, it must take into account values, norms, goals
and action choices of the individual.
Parsons in his book The Structure of Social Action (1937) proposed

a general conceptual scheme for social action and subsequently analyses
the concept of system. For him social action consists of the following-
l Social action is that behaviour by which an individual interacts with

external forces after understanding and interpreting its action.
l For Parsons, all action is behaviour, but not all behaviour constitute
social action. It is closely linked with an actor’s perception about things
and their meanings. Action is an outcome of what an actor perceives
about an event and how he or she responds. Action is defined by its
meaningfulness and it must be interpreted from the actor’s point of
view.
l The environment plays an important role in an actor’s behaviour. The

environment consists of social objects-i.e. other actors, cultural

environment (symbols, norms, values, signs etv) and the physical

environment.
l Human action is bounded by the physical environment and it acts as
a constraint on the actor’s behaviour.
To summarise, social action consists of three basic elements-
1. The subject- Actor, which can be an individual, group or a
collectivity;
2. The situation: Physical and social objects to which the actor
relates to;
3. Cultural symbols: norms, values etc, which influence an actors’
behaviour.
System of Social action:
For Parsons, human action exhibits the characteristics of a system.
System helps us understand reality. If sociology has to be a science, to
understand a behaviour, it must resort to a systemic analysis. Therefore, a
system is-
l A unified whole made up of interdependent parts. Each part is a sub-
system in its own and may also be treated as a system;
l Units or subsystems are relatively stable and there is a definite pattern
of relationship;
l Each system operates within a boundary; there is symbiotic
relationship between a system and the environment;
l A system is not fixed but rather dynamic; every system has certain
needs -certain imperatives or functional pre-requisites and derived
needs which are peculiar to each system only.
l Every social action is a system in its own and it consists of a complex
act which can be broken down into smaller units.
l For Parsons, the idea of human behaviour is culturally shaped. Norms,
values, symbols, beliefs etc. largely shape the cultural patterns and
it influences individual behaviour as well as collective action.
l Cultural patterns are dualistic in nature-it creates a dilemma, for it
forces the actor to make a decision. Others too have explained this
form of duality in a variety of ways, the most prominent being

Ferdinand Tonnies whose ideas on the dichotomy of ‘gemeinschaft’
(applicable to community life, usually associated with rural life) and
‘gesellschaft’(applicable to individual centred society, especially urban
life) worth mentioning. Durkheim too argues about the distinction
between mechanical and organic society in his book The Division of
Labour (1893). For Parsons, the duality of cultural patterns in
manifested in different ways-
1. Universalism versus particularism: actors relate to

others on the basis of general criteria or criteria unique
or specific to the individual concerned;
2. Ascribed versus achieved: actors relate to others

on the basis of criteria of performance or ‘achievement’
or criteria of some form of endowment of ‘ascription’;
3. Specificity versus diffuseness: actors relate to

others for a specific, restricted purpose or in a general
or holistic manner;
4. Affective neutrality versus affectivity: actors relate

to each other in a detached or instrumental fashion or
with the engagement of affect and emotion.4
For Parsons, the choice of one pattern over another depends largely
on the culture, but cultural patters of both ‘gemeinschaft’ and ‘gesellschaft’
can co-exist.
LET US KNOW
Gemeinschaft signifies a system of social relations

where the concept of kinship, blood ties, friendship
and neighbourhood are predominant.
Gemeinschaft types of society is mostly found in the villages. In
contrast, 'gesellschaft' system is prevalent in cities and industrial hubs
where individuals become bound only by contract and commercial
exchange.
CHECK YOUR PROGRESS
Q.4: What is the 'principle of emergence'?

..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
Q.5: Name two major works of Talcott Parsons.
..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
Q.6: What is social action?
..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
8.5 LET US SUM UP
l Parsons sought to build an 'ecology of sociology' wherein a general

theoretical structure for sociology would integrate all the social
sciences.
l Parsons' central concern was to develop a comprehensive and

coherent conceptual scheme for sociology that could be applied to
every society.
l For Parsons, sociological theories must take into account the subjective
dimensions but should also be able to develop general laws.
l Parsons argued that all action is behaviour, but not all behaviour
constitutes social action. It is closely linked with an actor's perception
about things and their meanings.
l According to Parsons, human action exhibits the characteristics of a

system. System helps us understand reality.
l Cultural patterns are dualistic in nature-it creates a dilemma, for it

forces the actor to make a decision.
l For Parsons, adoption of the structural functional approach was

required to understand social reality.

l Through AGIL model, known as the four function paradigm, Parsons

believed that there are four functional imperatives that are necessary
for all systems to survive.
8.6 FURTHER READING
1) Allan, K. (2007). The Social Lens: An Invitation to Social and

Sociological Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2) Burger, T. (1977). ‘Talcott Parsons, the Problem of Order in Society,
and the Program of an Analytical Sociology’. American Journal of
Sociology, 83(2), 320–339. doi:10.1086/226549
3) Dew, K. (2014). ‘Structural Functionalism’. The Wiley Blackwell
Encyclopedia of Health, Illness, Behavior, and Society, 2390–
2394. doi:10.1002/9781118410868.wbehibs305
4) Feuer, L. S., & Black, M. (1962). ‘The Social Theories of Talcott
Parsons: A Critical Examination’. The Journal of Philosophy, 59(7),
182. doi:10.2307/2023735.
5) Hier, S.P. (Ed) (2005). Contemporary Sociological Thought: Themes
and Theories. Ontario: Canadian Scholars’ Press Inc.
6) Kamenka, E. (1965). ‘Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft’. Political
Science, 17(1), 3–12. doi:10.1177/003231876501700101.
7) Lucas, J. W. (2007). ‘Structural Functional Theory’. The Blackwell
Encyclopedia of Sociology. doi:10.1002/9781405165518.wbeoss289.
8) Ormerod, R. (2019). ‘The history and ideas of sociological
functionalism: Talcott Parsons, modern sociological theory, and the
relevance for OR’. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1–
27. doi:10.1080/01605682.2019.1640590.
9) Turner, J.H. (2014). Theoretical Sociology: A concise introduction to
twelve sociological theories. Sage.
10) Valone, J. J. (1980). ‘Parsons’ contributions to sociological theory:
Reflections on the Schutz-Parsons correspondence’. Human Studies,
3(1), 375–386. doi:10.1007/bf02331823.
Ans to Q No 1: By "functions," generally mean consequences that

benefit society as a whole, contribute to its operation, or increase
its stability.
Ans to Q No 2: Adaptation (A), Goal Attainment (G) Integration (I) and
Latent pattern maintenance (L)
Ans to Q No 3: Value consensus means that the society as a whole is
centrally structured around a main set of 'shared values' and
maintenance of the same is important to achieve stability in
society.
Ans to Q No 4: According to Parsons, sociological theory must be
based on the 'principle of emergence', i.e. systems emerge with
certain properties which cannot be solely explained through the
interaction of its parts; values, norms, goals and action choices
also matter.
Ans to Q No 5: a. The Structure of Social Action (1937)
b. The Social System (1951)
Ans to Q No 6: Social action is that behaviour by which an individual
interacts with external forces after understanding and interpreting
its action.

Q. 1 : State the meaning of the concept of social action.
Q. 2 : Who wrote the book The Structure of Social Action (1937)?
Q. 1 : What is duality of cultural patterns?
Q. 2 : Write a note on the concept of AGIL?


Q. 1 : Discuss Parsons' framework of social action.
Q. 2 : According to Parsons, how is equilibrium in society maintained?
End notes:
1
Valone, J. J. (1980). Parsons’ contributions to sociological theory: Reflections on the Schutz-
Parsons correspondence. Human Studies, 3(1), 375–386. doi:10.1007/bf02331823 , p.376

2
Sharrock, W.W., Hughes, J.A. and Martin,P.J. (2003). Understanding Modern Sociology , Sage,
London, 2003. p.33.
3
Introduction Renée C. Fox, Victor M. Lidz, and Harold J. Bershady , available at https://
www.russellsage.org/sites/default/files/fox_chapter1_pdf.pdf,p.2
4
Sociological Theorists: Talcott Parsons, available at http://www.grahamscambler.com/
sociological-theorists-talcott-parsons/, accessed on 27.9.2019
*** ***** ***

# ○
Name of the Paper: ..............................................

○
○
Course Code: .......................................................

○
○
Centre for Internal Quality Assurance (CIQA)

○
○
Krishna Kanta Handiqui State Open University

○
○
City Office: Housefed Complex, Guwahati-781006

○
○
Learner’s Feedback on Course

○
○
Dear Learner,
○
○
Regarding the course as mentioned above, we would like to know your opinions and comments so
○
○
as to improve the quality of self learning materials in future. Please respond to the following statements
○
○
by ticking the number you feel most reflect your opinion. After completion of the additional comments,
○
○
please detach the page and send/mail the same to us at the address given below.
○
○
The Director, Centre for Internal Quality Assurance, KKHandiqui State Open University
○
○
Housefed Complex, Dispur, Guwahati-781006

○
○
(E-mail id: [email protected])

○
○
1) Approximately how many hours did you spend for studying the units in the course?
○
2) Please give your opinions (by ü mark) to the following items based on your reading of the block:
○
○
○
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Strongly
Disagree
Neither
Sl.
○
Agree
Agree
Agree
nor
Statements
○
No.
○
○
○
○
I) The SLMs of the course fulfil the learning objectives set

○
○
out in the beginning of each unit

○
II) The units of the SLM could satisfy my academic needs

○
○
and expectations
○
○
III) The Unit writers have excellent knowledge about the

○
○
course contents
○
○
IV) Language and contents of the units were presented at a

○
○
level which I could readily understand

○
V) Ample opportunity for participation in the activities

○
○
provided in the units

○
○
VI) Used enough Illustrations (Diagrams, tables etc.) for

○
○
conceptual clarity
○
○
VII) Quality of content is engaging, relevant, and up-to-date

○
○
VIII) The self check questions are very helpful

○
○
IX) The Possible/model questions and the answers to check

○
my progress have benefited me a lot

○
○
○
Additional Comments: (Please feel free to provide your open comments)

○
1) Which aspects of the SLM, according to you, worked well?

○
○
......................................................................................................................................................
○
○
......................................................................................................................................................
○
○
2) What sort of changes/improvements do you feel KKHSOU could implement to improve the overall
○
○
quality of the SLM?

○
○
......................................................................................................................................................
○
#○
......................................................................................................................................................
○

○
○
Thank you for taking the time to complete this form.

○
○

Block 1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Block 1

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Block 1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PGPS S4 01

Exam Code: SOM

KRISHNA KANTA HANDIQUI STATE OPEN UNIVERSITY

SLM Preparation Team

Content : Prof. Jayanta Krishna Sarmah, Gauhati University

Unit 1 : Social Movement 7-20

1.1 Learning Objectives

1.1 LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After going through this unit, you will be able to:

Social Movements are collective expression of masses against the

1.3 MEANING AND DEFINITION OF SOCIAL

In general, people indulge in organized dissatisfaction against

In protest against observed inequalities, oppression and unjustified

Thus, different large or informal or unorganized groups protest against

Different scholars of different fields conceptualize social movements

The term “social movements” was introduced in 1848 by the German

According to Anderson and Parker, social movement is “a form of

Lundberg and others defined social movement as “a voluntary

Charles Tilly defined social movements as a series of contentious

Sidney Tarrow defines a social movement as collective challenges

Social Movements are “organized efforts to promote or resist change

De la Porta & Diani in Social Movements: An Introduction, referred

Turner and Killian (1972) defines social movement as some

CHECK YOUR PROGRESS

Q.1: State the meaning of social movement?

1.4 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF SOCIAL

The roots of first documented social movements can be traced back

Considering the matters of political representation, market

A much larger movement of anti-Catholic protest was triggered by

Other political movements that emerged in the late 18th century

tendencies were seen in poorer countries as the pressure for reform

Throughout the history of the United States, social movements have

As early as the American Revolution, the sophisticated mobilization

Besides, Bhakti movement was another significant socio-religious

Again, in pre-colonial and post-colonial period; India witnessed

1.5 FEATURES OF SOCIAL MOVEMENTS

Social movements are primarily marked by the following

l Most of the social movements are carried on the basis of informal

l Social Movements develops via cycles of activities. Only through

l Certain social movements propagate definite vision and some others

l It is an organized collective act with common objective, philosophy

l Sometimes, they challenge or defend existing institutional models or

l They are collective enterprises and display at least some degrees of

l Certain social movements reflect people's dissatisfaction and are

l Certain social movements are able to highly influence public opinion

l Social Movements can be of Resistance type, Reform type,

l The goals of Social Movements are like equitable distribution of

l In most of the social movements, the general mob exercise power by

l Social movements push the allied community to capitalize socio-

greater social bonding and unity irrespective of diversities among

l Social movements are seen as instruments for greater social

Thus, a social movement is a network of informal interactions between

CHECK YOUR PROGRESS

Q.5: The members of social movement share

1.6 IMPORTANCE OF SOCIAL MOVEMENTS

The effectiveness or significance of social movements can be

l Social movements can enlighten their members through developing

action and developing non-state civil society groups or actors etc.

l Social movements mostly benefit the weaker, unrepresented,

* * *