Nuisance Meaning and Implication Under Nigerian Law
Nuisance Meaning and Implication Under Nigerian Law
Nuisance Meaning and Implication Under Nigerian Law
C IVIL L AW C R IMIN AL L AW
Ad removed. Details
Table of Contents
1. What is Nuisance?
1.1. When is Nuisance Actionable?
1.2. Types of Nuisance
1.2.1. Private Nuisance
1.2.1.1. Categories of Private Nuisance
1.2.1.2. What to Prove when Suing under Private Nuisance
1.2.2. Public Nuisance
1.3. Section 234 of the Criminal Code Act in Nigeria:
1.4. Differences between Public and Private Nuisance
2. Conclusion
What is Nuisance?
In ordinary parlance, Nuisance may be termed a disturbance, an inconvenience or
obstruction from the quite enjoyment of ones environment.
According to Black’s Law Dictionary 9th Edition, Nuisance is defined as a condition,
activity, or situation (such as a loud noise or foul odor) that interferes with the use or
enjoyment of property.
Nuisance was also defined by the Supreme Court in the case of IPADEOLA & ANOR. v.
OSHOWOLE. (1987) LPELR-1531 (SC) to be;
In the case of ADEDIRAN & ANOR v. INTERLAND TRANSPORT LTD (1991) LPELR-
88(SC), the Supreme Court held that;
1. Public Nuisance;
2. Private Nuisance.
Private Nuisance
The tort of private nuisance essentially arises wherever an individual takes up
residence. It is important to understand that acts taken on ones land may negatively
affect the private and peaceful enjoyment of the land of another individual.
In other words, private nuisance involves the use of one’s property in a manner that
causes significant harm to another individual’s use or enjoyment of their private land.
In other words, Private nuisance, unlike Public nuisance, is designed to protect the
interest of owners or occupiers of land from any form of impediment to the enjoyment
of their land that may arise as a result of another party’s substantial interference.
1. Physical injury to plaintiff ’s property: e.g., where the plaintiff’s harm is affected
by the fumes from the defendant’s factory.
2. Substantial Interference with the plaintiff ’s use and enjoyment of his land: for
example, when the loud sound of machines emanating from the defendant’s
factory can be heard in the plaintiff’s residence.
3. Interference with easements and profits: e.g., where the defendant wrongfully
obstructs the plaintiff’s right of way or right to light.
2. That the interference was unreasonable. For instance; caused out of malice;
Public Nuisance
Public nuisance is a crime, but in certain situations, can also create a cause of action
in tort. It applies where a nuisance ‘materially affects the reasonable comfort and
convenience’ of a class of people. Claimants must prove they have suffered special
damage, other than that suffered by the affected group.
Public nuisance occurs when a person by his action or inaction causes inconvenience
to the general public. This could be in the form of blocking the road, the release of
fumes from a factory, the making of loud noise and so on. Public nuisance is generally a
crime under common law, it is actionable only by the Attorney General (this has been
made void by the provision of section 6(6)(b) of the 1999 Constitution).
In Nigeria, public nuisance has been made criminal by the provision of S.234 of the
Criminal Code.
(a) obstructs any highway, by any permanent work or erection thereon or injury thereto,
which renders the highway less commodious to the public than it would otherwise be; or
(b) prevents the public from having access to any part of a highway by an excessive and
unreasonable temporary use thereof, or by so dealing with the land in the immediate
neighbourhood of the highway as to prevent the public from using and enjoying it
securely; or
(e) willfully diverts or obstructs the course of any navigable river so as to appreciably
diminish its convenience for purposes of navigation; or
( f) does any act not warranted by law, or omits to discharge any legal duty, which act or
omission obstructs or causes inconvenience or damage to the public in the exercise of
rights common to the public,
The owner of a vessel wrecked in a navigable river is not guilty of a common nuisance
because he does not remove it.
An individual can bring an action to court against a public nuisance, when he has
suffered ‘particular damages’ by the interference. This ‘particular damages’ must be
such that is over and beyond the ordinary damages suffered by other members of the
society.
This was decision of the Court in Amos vs. Shell BP Nigeria Ltd, it was held by the
court that;
“a private individual would have a right of action when it comes to public nuisance if he
can establish before the court that by the defendant’s action, he has suffered damage over
and above other members of the society“.
Remedies awarded to a claimant in the tort of Nuisance both public and private are
mostly injunctions and damages.
From the foregoing, let us now consider some differences between Public and Private
Nuisance.
1. A public nuisance affects the public generally, while a private nuisance affects a
party privately.
2. Public nuisance is a crime, and a tort when particular damage is proved by an
individual. However, private nuisance is solely tortious.
3. Public nuisance is actionable by the Attorney General, while private nuisance is
not.
4. To succeed in Private Nuisance, the plaintiff must have an interest in the land.
Such an interest is unnecessary in an action arising under public nuisance.
Conclusion
In Nigeria where we encounter situations that constitute Nuisance, it is better to be
armed with the law to know that which is actionable and entitle one to the remedies
accruing to an aggrieved party.
+3
LEAVE A REPLY
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Comment
Name *
Email *
Website
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
POST COMMENT
PR EVIO U S PO S T
N EXT PO S T
FE A T UR E D PO ST S
Section 23 & 24 of the 1999 Constitution: National Ethics & Duties of a Nigerian Citizens
March 27, 2021
A D V E R T I SE ME N T