Outcomes-Based Institutional Accreditation Instrument

PHILIPPINES COPYRIGHT 2014
by the Accrediting Agency of Chartered Colleges

and Universities in the Philippines (AACCUP), Inc
Survey Instrument for Institutional Accreditation

(Criteria of Evaluation in Institutional Accreditation)
First Year of Publication, September 2014
Published by
The Accrediting Agency of Chartered Colleges
and Universities in the Philippines AACCUP, Inc
Printed in the Philippines by

AACCUP, Inc.
5A-B Future Point Plaza III, Panay Avenue
South Triangle 1103, Quezon City
and
CA MEGAPRINT
88 F. Estrella St. Atlag, Malolos 3000, Bulacan
All rights reserved.

No part of this book may be reproduced
without permission from the publisher.
FOREWORD
One of the key messages this Institutional Outcomes-Based Instrument can bring is the
importance of evaluation. Evaluation is not just a snapshot of outcomes. It is demonstrating
the achievement of results. Results come from good governance, hence this instrument.
This Institutional Outcomes – Based Accreditation Instrument of the Accrediting

Agency of Chartered Colleges and Universities of the Philippines (AACCUP) is its latest major
document which resulted from the former Institutional Accreditation Instrument of this
agency. Said instrument was in use since 2010 for just a few State Universities then.
Combined with the Commission on Higher Education’s Institutional Sustainability
Assessment, the final components are as follows:
1) Governance and Management;
2) Teaching, Learning and Evaluation;
3) Faculty and Staff;
4) Research;
5) Extension and Consultancy and Linkages;
6) Support to Students;
7) Library;
8) Infrastructure and Learning Resources; and
9) Quality Assurance Culture.
The different components have parameters with items classified into Inputs and Processes,
Implementation and Outcome/s. Rubrics of evaluation fall within a range of zero to five to
ascertain objective evaluation. Where items could not be rated within the range, “Not
Applicable “(N/A) may be indicated.
The AACCUP will undertake its institutional accreditation starting the end of 2014 using
this new instrument. This has been made possible in partnership with the Commission on
Higher Education for its financial assistance and the Philippine Association of State Universities
and Colleges to which the AACCUP with the experts and specialist who assisted to finalized the
instrument. To them all, the AACCUP is greatly indebted.
AREA I
GOVERNANCE and MANAGEMENT
PARAMETERS
A. Governance – Organizational Structure
B. Probity
C. Governance – Strategic Vision
D. Governance – Accountability
E. Governance – Awareness and Management of Risk
F. Governance – Effective Monitoring of Performance
G. Management and Financial Control
H. Enabling Feature – Use of Information and Communications
Technology in Management
I. Resource Generation Strategies
J. Other Enabling Features
SUC :
Campus :
Date of Actual Survey :
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
4
AREA I: GOVERNANCE AND MANAGEMENT (including resource generation)
RATING SCALE
NA 0 1 2 3 4 5
- - Poor Fair Satisfactory Very Satisfactory Excellent
Not Missing Criterion is met Criterion is met in Criterion is met in Criterion is fully met Criterion is fully
Applicable minimally in some most respects, but all respects in all respects, at a met with
respects, but much some improvement is level that substantial number
Improvement is needed to overcome demonstrates good of good practices,
needed to overcome weaknesses practice at a level that
weaknesses provides a model
for others
(75% lesser than the (50% lesser than the (100% compliance (50% greater than the (75% greater than
standards) standards) with the standards) standards) the standards)
Parameter Mean
Item Rating (IR)
Implementation –
System –
(PM)
Indicators
PARAMETER A: GOVERNANCE – ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

SYSTEM – INPUTS AND PROCESSES
S.1 The governance of the institution is clearly defined in the
organizational structure.
S.2 The powers, functions/duties and responsibilities of key officials are

clearly delineated.
S.3 Administrative and academic councils/bodies exist to assist in

decision - making as defined in the organizational structure.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1. The policy - making body demonstrates strong leadership and
supports the institution’s programs and operations.
I.2. The key officials follow the functional relationship structure in

decision - making.
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
I.3. The organizational structure is used in defining the lines of
communication and coordination.
I.4. The Administrative and Academic Councils function effectively.
OUTCOME/S
O.1. Functions of various units and implementation of programs and
projects are well-coordinated.
O.2. Conflict in administrative jurisdictions and official relationships are

minimal.
O.3. Stakeholders feel satisfied in the management of the institution.
O.4. Stronger cooperation and coordination among individuals and units

are observable.
O.5. The governing body demonstrates integrity and objectivity in all

transactions in the pursuit of the mission of the institution.
O.6. Various stakeholders express satisfaction with openness and

transparency in the dissemination of the Governing Body’s decisions.
Best Practices:
PARAMETER B: PROBITY
1. Guidelines and protocols are in place.
2. Major policies and decisions are available.
2
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
3. Members of the organization articulate/describe guidelines and
practices, or state where they can be found.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.9. The organization follows institutional processes with respect to
governance because members of the Governing Body and
Management were selected based on clear guidelines and
procedures.
I.11.Administrators clearly articulate, follow, and implement the policies
and guidelines set by the Governing Body.
I.13.The organization follows well-defined lines of communication in the
transaction of business and in its daily operations.
I.15.Stakeholders receive timely information on policies, guidelines and

T major decisions of the Governing Board and/or Management.
OUTCOME/S
1. Stakeholders find Governing Body’s decisions fair and transparent.
2. Management and other stakeholders are able to make sound

decisions or take appropriate actions from the good governance of
the Institution.
Best Practices:
PARAMETER C: GOVERNANCE -STRATEGIC VISION
3
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
S.1. The management is guided by a well-defined institutional vision and
mission, which are in consonance with regional, national, global
trends, goals and objectives.
S.2. There is a strategic plan of the institution, which was approved and
supported by governing body.
S.3. The strategic plan is consistent with the institutional vision/mission.
S.4. There are indicators for the goals/objectives of the strategic plan.
S.5. The plan articulates the means to reach the goals, including human,
financial, and physical resources needed in the implementation.
S.6. Planning system is in place.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1. Planning procedures are followed.
I.3. The implementation of the strategic plan is anchored on the

Institutional mission.
I.5. The institution implements the Strategic Plan and periodically

evaluates it.
I.7. Stakeholders support the Strategic Plan because various sectors

took part in putting it together.
I.9. Programs and projects geared towards achieving the institution’s

vision and mission are clearly planned, implemented, monitored,
evaluated and continuously improved.
4
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
OUTCOME/S
O.1.The Development Plan is well-implemented.
O.2.There is a demonstrable information to indicate continual stability

of, and confidence in, the institution’s ability to pursue its mission.
Best Practices:
PARAMETER D: GOVERNANCE –ACCOUNTABILITY

S.1. There are written policies and guidelines in the use of various funds.
S.3. There are systems for monitoring and evaluation to ensure

compliance with laws and rules on government expenditures.
S.5. Stakeholders are aware of the laws and rules on Government

Expenditures.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1. The HEI follows the processes set in the internal control system to
ensure accountability.
I.3. Appropriate actions are done to address findings in internal/external

audit reports performed by appropriate internal audit office, the
COA and other external independent bodies.
I.5. Funds provided by agencies and individuals are used for the
intended purposes, with the Governing Body ensuring the proper
5
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
use and monitoring of results.
I.7. The Administration ensures that funds are allocated in accordance
with the approved budget of expenditures, and under specified
terms and conditions.
OUTCOME/S
O.1. Fund utilization is effective.
O.3. Accounting of funds is robust
O.5. There is unqualified Annual Audit Report.
O.7. Disallowances are minimal.
O.9. Required reports are prepared and submitted on time.
Best Practices:
PARAMETER E: GOVERNANCE -AWARENESS AND MANAGEMENT OF RISK

S.1. The unit heads are fully aware of the risks encountered in
management.
S.2. A finance team studies, manages, and evaluates major financial

investments.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1. The financial timeliness is regularly observed.
6
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
I.2. The Institution conducts Risk Assessment and Risk Response
activities.
I.3. The Institution implements its financial strategy and spends its
operating and budget through well-defined processes and
administrative structures.
OUTCOME/S
O.1. The HEI is solvent, financially stable, and sustainable because of
appropriate systems and structures that safeguard its assets.
O.2. The financial sustainability of the HEI results from the effective and
efficient fiscal management of persons/teams clearly designated by
the governing body.
Best Practices:
PARAMETER F: GOVERNANCE -EFFECTIVE MONITORING OF

PERFORMANCE
S.1. There is a scheme of periodic monitoring of fund utilization with
planned activities.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1. The schedule of implementation of projects are duly followed
together with the corresponding financial timelines.
7
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
OUTCOME/S
O.1.There is a culture of quality manifested by the regular monitoring of
the performance of the HEI against its planned strategies and
operational targets.
O.2.Programs are kept current and relevant because the governing body
is involved in their approval, performance, and monitoring.
O.3.Institutional sustainability is promoted through:
O.3.1. the strategic management of the institution’s land,

buildings, facilities and other resources;
O.3.2. the institution’s employment policies;
O.3.3. arrangements for consideration of student grievances,

and student discipline; and
O.3.5. procedures to safeguard the health and safety of

employees, students, and other individuals while they
are in the institution’s premises, or in other places
where they may be affected by its operations.
Best Practices:
PARAMETER G: MANAGEMENT AND FINANCIAL CONTROL

S.1. There is a sound system of management and financial control.
S.3. A mechanism for effective monitoring and control of income-

generating projects is in place.
8
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1. Policies and systems of financial management and control are
developed and implemented with the involvement of
administrators, faculty, and, where appropriate, students.
I.2. Concerned officials, faculty, staff and students participate in budget

preparation, allocation, management and control.
I.3. Resources are allocated to authorized expenditures to implement

academic programs, research, extension and other projects as
included in the institutions program of expenditures..
I.4. The institution is able to communicate with its key stakeholders.
OUTCOME/S
O.1.Operations are efficient, effective, and responsive to challenges and
changes.
O.2.The budget of the institution is well-prepared, judiciously allocated,

effectively utilized, clearly accounted and fairly audited.
O.3.Systems and processes reflect sound management, financial control,

and quality assurance.
O.4.Stakeholders are satisfied with the governing body’s and

management’s implementation of their commitments.
Best Practices:
9
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
PARAMETER H: ENABLING FEATURE- USE OF INFORMATION AND
COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY IN MANAGEMENT
S.1. The institution makes effective use of information and
communications technology to manage its operations and academic
affairs. (Separate from ICT for learning)
S.3. There is a responsive link between ICT systems of administrative and

academic offices to ensure optimal communication and use of
information.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1. The use of ICT resources makes it easier and more efficient to
manage operations, including accounting, HR, purchasing, etc.
I.2. The HEI uses the Management Information Systems (MIS) to enable
it to be more efficient in the management of student and faculty
records, as well as in planning for, and implementation of academic
programs, budget, etc.
I.3. Staff, faculty, and administrators are proficient in ICT, with the HEI
providing training and/or support.
OUTCOME/S
O.1.Technologically enhanced system of communication enhances
management coordination and cooperation.
O.2. The institution projects the image of a modern technologically

y enabled academic institution.
Best Practices:
10
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
PARAMETER I: RESOURCE GENERATION STRATEGIES
S.1. There are mechanisms for the institution to actively appraise
potential sources of additional resources to support its development
plans.
S.3. The institution has viable and sustainable income-generating

projects to support and augment the regular budget appropriated by
the government.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1. The HEI implements its development plans, supported by viable,
sustainable, and appropriate resource generation strategies.
I.2. The institution generates resources to supplement its tuition and

other income.
I.3. The HEI avails itself of resources through its links with government
and non-government agencies in the Philippines and overseas.
OUTCOME/S
O.1. The resource generation initiatives are sustainable, with the HEI
taking a prudent attitude toward the management of risk.
O.2. Funds and other resources derived from specific projects produce
the outcomes specified by the funder.
O.3. The monitoring and evaluation of resource generation activities

enable the HEI to enhance further initiatives.
11
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
O.4. Adequate resources plowed into the institution to augment
government subsidy.
Best Practices:
PARAMETER J: OTHER ENABLING FEATURES

S.1. The HEI has other features that enable it to achieve its goals.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1. The enabling features are fully used to enhance efficiency and
effectiveness of administration.
OUTCOME/S
O.1.A high-tech administrative machinery.
Best Practices:
Total Rating:
Area Mean:
12
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
13
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Commendations (Strengths): Omissions (Areas Needing
Improvement):

Recommendations
▪ To be complied with before award of ▪ To be complied with after award of
accreditation status accreditation status
Area Lead Accreditor(s):
1.
2.
AREA II
TEACHING, LEARNING and EVALUATION
PARAMETERS
A. Setting and Achieving Program Standards
B. Program Approval
C. Program Monitoring and Review
D. Action to Strengthen Program
E. ICT Resources
SUC :
Campus :
AREA II: TEACHING, LEARNING AND EVALUATION
RATING SCALE
NA 0 1 2 3 4 5
for others
Parameter Mean
Item Rating (IR)
Implementation –
System –
(PM)
Indicators
PARAMETER A: SETTING AND ACHIEVING PROGRAM STANDARDS

Setting of Objectives and Learning Outcomes
S.1.Academic programs have clearly defined objectives and learning
outcomes.
S.1.1. The objectives and learning outcomes of a program are

aligned with the institution’s Vision, Mission and Goals.
S.1.2. There is a clear articulation of how the programs develop
the attributes/desired competencies of its ideal graduates.
S.2.Degree programs meet the specific program outcomes/
competencies and standards stipulated in the PSG of the CHED.
S. The curricular programs are consistent with the

S.1. institution’s vision and mission and also with local, national
and global development goals.
S.2.
S.2.1.
13
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
S.2.2. The curricular programs are supported with appropriate,
updated and innovative learning processes and resources.
S.3. There is a process being followed in the preparation, deliberation,
and approval of the new/revised curriculum.
S.4. There is a process being followed in the preparation, evaluation,

revision and approval of the syllabi.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1. Program objectives, targets or results are understood by
stakeholders.
I.2. Faculty translate objectives and learning outcomes in the teaching

of their courses.
I.3. The institution establishes and maintains comparability of standards

with other providers of similar/equivalent programs.
OUTCOME/S
O.1. The institution have well-designed academic programs..
O.2. Program objectives and outcomes are achieved.
O.3. Curricular program objectives and outcomes are compliant with

CHED requirements and to the institution’s vision, mission and
goals.
Best Practices:
PARAMETER B: PROGRAM APPROVAL
14
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
S.1. There is a system for approving academic programs, revision and
development.
S.2. The process of approval of academic programs is clear to

stakeholders.
S.3. The system of approval includes alignment of resources to the

Vision, Goals and Objectives.
S.4. The system of approval reflects clear articulation of development

needs of the region, nation and the world articulating the
relationships and development of desired competencies.
S.5. The system accommodates new updates in the approval of

programs.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1. Approval of the academic programs considers:
I.31.1. the HEI’s VMG;
I.31.2. the HEI’s resources;
I.31.3. the development needs of the region/country; and
I.31.4. its ability to ensure that programs enable students to

achieve the specified intended outcomes.
I.3. Committees at various levels are set up to act on proposed

programs.
I.5. Feedback from stakeholders are considered in the approval of

programs.
I.7. Program approval follows a process starting with the plan and
ending with notification of action taken.
I.9. Various committees act on the approval of programs from collegial

academic discussions by the different levels namely department,
college, university, and Board of Trustees/Regents.
15
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
I.11. Academic programs are implemented in accordance with the terms
and conditions set in the approval.
I.13. Well trained faculty members facilitate student learning and are
provided appropriate learning resources, facilities, and
administrative support.
I.15. There is regular evaluation of faculty performance and self

evaluation of individual programs through licensure passing
rates(when applicable), employment rates, and graduates and
stakeholders feedbacks for program enhancement.
I.17. The institution has policies and processes to match students’

abilities and aptitudes to the demands of the programs to which
they are recruited.
I.19. The institution provides academic support to students and faculty
for effective teaching and learning.
I.21. The institution ensures the use of pedagogical skills among faculty
who are not graduates of teacher education.
I.23. Learning process is enhanced through the use of varied teaching

techniques and methodologies, instructional materials, computer-
aided instruction and non-traditional teaching approaches to
produce desirable learning outcomes.
I.25. The institution has programs that allow students to practice their
learned competencies in view of their future careers, such as
practicum, internship and on-the-job training.
I.27. Stakeholders participate in the preparation and periodic review of

syllabi which are distributed to students for effective instruction.
OUTCOME/S
O.1. An effective system of program approval and implementation is
developed.
O.2. The programs are consistent with Vision, Mission and Goals of the
Institution.
O.3. The objectives of the programs are consistent with the desired
16
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
competencies.
O.4. Credibility of the programs is noteworthy due to transparency of
processes.
Best Practices:
PARAMETER C: PROGRAM MONITORING AND REVIEW

S.1. A system of monitoring and evaluation of programs exists in the
institution.
S.3. The institution adopts a mechanism for continuous evaluation and

improvement in the delivery of academic programs.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1. The institution effectively uses monitoring and reviewing the
effectiveness of its programs to ensure that they remain current
and valid in the light of developments in the relevant field of study
and related employment opportunities.
I.3. The institution maintains the coherence of programs by using

alternative modes of delivery system.
I.5. Programs are made to remain current and valid in the light of
developments in the relevant field of study and related
employment.
I.7. The institution ensures effective link between academic planning
and resource allocation
I.9. Graduate programs (when applicable) are supported by relevant

research or other advanced scholarship
I.11.Periodic review, monitoring, and evaluation of curricular programs

by stakeholders are conducted to accommodate recent trends and
17
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
developments.
I.13.Students’ progression is periodically monitored and disseminated to
students and parents for appropriate action, and remedial programs
are made available, if needed.
I.15.The results of the evaluation of student and faculty achievements as

well as monitoring provide decisions on aspects to be revised and
improved.
I.17.Academic policy review and formulation are being done within three
to five years for realignment with the institution’s Strategic or
Development Plan.
I.19. The institution’s monitoring system places content, design,

operation and maintenance of evaluation procedure on expert
designees.
OUTCOME/S
Quality Teaching-Learning
O.1. Student achievements and awards are remarkable.
O.2. High passing rate is evident in the Board and Licensure Exams as
follows:
75% higher than the national passing average
50% higher than the national passing average
Equal to the national passing average
Below the national passing average
O.3. The institution is recognized in the regional and national levels for
the performance of its graduates in the board and bar exams is
apparent.
O.4. Acceptance and recognition of curricular programs are

commendable in the local, national and international level for
producing quality and employable graduates.
18
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
O.5. Graduates demonstrate the programs desired competencies.
O.6. The programs are comparable with similar/equivalent courses of

other HEI’s.
Best Practices:
PARAMETER D: ACTION TO STRENGTHEN PROGRAM

S.1. There are mechanisms for disseminating good practices throughout
the institution.
S.3. There is a system for continuous improvement and innovations to

strengthen programs.
S.5. There are internal bodies (e.g. QA units, or committees) which take
charge of strengthening programs.
S.7. An external system of improving or strengthening program exists.
S.9. The institution has an effective system of student assessment to

determine students’ progress and attainment of learning outcomes.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1. The feedbacks from faculty, students, employers, and other
stakeholders are evaluated and acted upon.
I.2. Weaknesses in student performance are identified and appropriate

actions are promptly taken.
19
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
I.3. The institution adopts self-institutional evaluation of the progress by
inside experts.
I.4. The institution adopts likewise external evaluation and integrates

the results together with the former for strengthening the
programs.
I.5. Mechanisms are utilized through implementing policies on self
evaluation by experts, internal monitoring by officials concerned
and student evaluation.
I.6. The HEI implements improvements that address the formation of

their ideal graduate, which in turn depends on their vision and HEI
type.
I.7. The institution responds to matters that are raised through self-
evaluation, formal internal monitoring, or external review.
OUTCOME/S
O.1. Student Performance is remarkable.
O.2. Employability of graduates is high.
O.3. Feedback, especially effectiveness and impact of changes is

proposed and implemented
Best Practices:
PARAMETER E: ICT RESOURCES
S.1. The institution has provided ICT resources to support student
20
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
learning.
S.2. There is a good ratio of students to terminals and other ICT
equipment.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1. The institution makes effective use of Information and
Communications Technology (ICT) resources to support student
learning and to manage its academic and administrative programs.
I.2.1. There is adequate allocation of state-of-the-art ICT
resources to different units based on need and national
standards.
I.2.2. ICT resources are accessible for use by both faculty and
students.
I.2.3. Training for the use of ICT to support learning is

periodically provided to the faculty.
I.2.4. Training for the use of ICT facilities is made available to

students.
I.3. The established policies regarding the selection and effective use of
information and communication technology resources are
religiously followed.
I.5. Adequate and continual support to effect learning on how to use

ICT resources and access information in different formats are
provided to faculty and students.
OUTCOME/S
O.1. Updated instructional materials are available.
O.2. Students use ICT in the academic activities and are challenged to
create innovative projects/outputs.
O.3. Faculty use ICT for teaching, thus making classes interesting and
challenging.
Best Practices:
21
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
Total Rating:
Area Mean:
22
Improvement):

Recommendations
1.
2.
AREA III
FACULTY and STAFF
PARAMETERS
A. Recruitment, Selection, and Compensation
B. Qualifications and Competence
C. Faculty Development
D. Workload and Performance
SUC :
Campus :
AREA III: FACULTY AND STAFF
RATING SCALE
NA 0 1 2 3 4 5
for others
Parameter Mean
Item Rating (IR)
Implementation –
System –
(PM)
Indicators
PARAMETER A: RECRUITMENT, SELECTION, AND COMPENSATION

S.1. HEI documents show clear criteria for hiring, retention and
promotion.
S.3. Procedures of recruiting the best qualified faculty and staff are
present. The terms and conditions of employment of faculty and
staff are clearly defined in written documents.
S.5. The institution provides a system of compensation and rewards for
the faculty which are embodied in policies / guidelines and covered
by standard procedures.
S.7. There are committees that recruit and select faculty and staff.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1. The recruitment and selection committees strictly follow the criteria
in hiring faculty and staff.
23
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
I.2. The institution provides compensation and rewards as provided in
the policies/guidelines.
I.3. The institution periodically reviews its system of hiring, selection and
compensation of the faculty and staff.
OUTCOME/S
O.1. Qualified faculty and staff are employed.
O.2. High The retention rate of qualified faculty and staff is high.
O.3. The incentive system attracts qualified faculty and staff.
Best Practices:
PARAMETER B: QUALIFICATIONS AND COMPETENCE

Faculty competence is assured:
S.1 The faculty have academic preparation, pedagogical and technical
skills, and experiences relevant to the courses they are assigned to
teach.
S.2 There is an adequate number of faculty and staff with appropriate

qualifications and skills to handle the courses offered and technically
support the research, extension, and production programs.
IMPLEMENTATION
24
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
I.1. Implementation of curricular programs is supported by adequate
number of qualified faculty (vis-à-vis faculty:student ratio) as
prescribed by appropriate bodies.
I.3. Faculty competence is assured as indicated by a good proportion of
faculty who fully update themselves with developments in their
academic field and have mastery of the content and contexts of the
program they teach.
I.5. The Faculty accept willingly the full range of responsibilities of a

higher education faculty to promote and facilitate the learning of
students.
I.7. The Faculty continue to update their instructional competencies.
I.9. The Faculty employ strategies to facilitate learning.
I.11.The faculty employ strategies to make sure that students’ higher

order thinking order skills are developed.
I.13.The faculty are accessible to students for consultancy, mentoring,

etc. to ensure continuity and stability of academic programs.
OUTCOME/S
O.1. The institution maintains a corps of qualified and competent faculty
and staff.
O.2. A high quality of education is maintained as a result of qualified

faculty.
O.3. The faculty are accessible for students’ consultation.
Best Practices:
25
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
PARAMETER C: FACULTY DEVELOPMENT
S.1. The institution adopts and implements an approved faculty and staff
development program.
S.3. There are policies, guidelines, rules and regulations governing faculty
and staff development.
S.5. There are incentives for faculty to undergo professional

development.
S.7. There is a good proportion of faculty active in professional

organizations and inter-agency committees.
S.9. Funding for the Faculty and Staff Development Program is sufficient,
and sustainable.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1. The Faculty Development Program is vigorously implemented by the
institution.
I.2. The institution provides funds to support the Faculty and

Development Program and searches for scholarships and grants from
outside sources.
I.3. Faculty members and staff continue to update themselves to improve

their instructional and administrative competence.
I.4. Faculty join professional organizations relevant to their field of

specialization.
OUTCOME/S
O.1. Faculty and staff competence are matched to the requirements of
the academic, research, extension, and production programs of the
26
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
institution.
Best Practices:
PARAMETER D: WORKLOAD AND PERFORMANCE

S.1. Policies on teaching load allows time to perform academic-related
activities like consultation, research, extension, publication of
scholarly works, etc.
S.3. There is a duly approved faculty and staff evaluation system that is
periodically implemented.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1. The scheme, policies and guidelines governing faculty and staff
workload are judiciously followed.
I.2. Results of evaluation are disseminated and used as inputs in

enhancing work performance and productivity
I.3. The institution adopts, adheres, and disseminates to all members of

the faculty a statement on academic freedom vis-à-vis research,
teaching and publications.
OUTCOME/S
O.1. The faculty are recognized and are highly regarded by their peers.
O.2. Faculty improve their performance because of feedback from regular

evaluation.
O.3. Faculty capability and productivity are manifested in terms of
27
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
learning, research, extension, and production outputs/outcomes.
O.4. Awards and citations received by the faculty are outcomes of
competitive selection and highly regarded evaluation.
Best Practices:
Total Rating:
Area Mean:
28
Improvement):

Recommendations
1.
2.
AREA IV
RESEARCH
PARAMETER
A. Research Strategy and Capacity
SUC :
Campus :
AREA IV: RESEARCH
RATING SCALE
NA 0 1 2 3 4 5
for others
System – Implementation
– Outcome Mean (SIOM)
Parameter Mean
Item Rating (IR)
(PM)
Indicators
PARAMETER A: RESEARCH STRATEGY AND CAPACITY

S.1. The institution has a research agenda/program which is a product of
collaborative efforts among its faculty, students and intended
clientele/stakeholders; and is in consonance with its mission, and also
with local, regional, national and international research thrusts and
priorities.
S.2. Faculty have research experience in other universities/research

institutions in the Philippines and/or abroad.
S.3. The faculty and staff possess the appropriate educational/academic/

training background to conduct research.
S.4. The institution’s research is supported by facilities and resources and

funds available in the institution’s budget and/or from other sources.
S.5. The institution has a mechanism for disseminating significant results

to the various clientele.
IMPLEMENTATION
29
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
I.1. The institution contributes to the discovery of new knowledge
through its overall strategy for managing and developing its research.
I.2. The institution adopts a mechanism for promoting a culture of
inquiry, and research among its faculty, staff, and students.
I.3. The institution’s research addresses regional and national needs and
priorities.
I.4. The institution is successful in securing financial support for its
research activities because it has strong linkages with the local,
regional, national and international agencies (government and
private), in terms of technical and funding support.
I.5. There is support for graduate research students
I.6. The institution conducts group/joint researches in collaboration with

other institutions to address common general or national concerns.
I.7. The institution has established an intellectual property office in order

to address the needs of researches for patent
application/registration-receiving intellectual property rights for
utility model, patented technologies, copyright.
I.8. The institution has a system of providing incentives to researchers

who come up with quality research output(e.g. publication award).
I.9. The institution has implemented/adopted the technology transfer to

encourage R & D where to fully engage themselves.
I.10. The institution supports the scientific career merit system to qualified
non-teaching staff.
OUTCOME/S
O.1. The institution’s research outputs are published in research journals.
O.2. The research program contributes to the development of the
30
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
community/nation by the economic benefits derived by the internal
clientele.
O.3. The institution is recognized for its research capability in the local,
regional, national and/or international level
O.4. The institution’s research is at levels of international excellence as

evidenced by their publication in refereed journals.
O.5. The institution has created/established technology business to

showcase which are ready for commercialization and adoption by
the intended clientele.
O.6. The institution has owned patents (invention or utility models),

copyrights, trademarks and industrial designs.
Best Practices:
Total Rating:
Area Mean:
31
AREA IV: RESEARCH
Improvement):
AREA IV: RESEARCH

Recommendations
1.
2.
AREA V
EXTENSION, CONSULTANCY and LINKAGES
PARAMETERS
A. Extension and Outreach
B. Networking and Linkages
SUC :
Campus :
AREA V: EXTENSION, CONSULTANCY AND LINKAGES
RATING SCALE
NA 0 1 2 3 4 5
for others
Parameter Mean
Item Rating (IR)
Implementation –
System –
(PM)
Indicators
PARAMETER A: EXTENSION AND OUTREACH

S.1. The institution has a well-defined extension program based on
community needs relevant to its mission.
S.2. There is a pool of technical experts that can provide the professional
manpower for extension and other activities.
S.3. An Extension Manual is available.
S.4. The institution provides funding in its annual appropriations and

from other sources for the conduct and sustainability of the extension
program.
S.5. The institution provides technologies for the extension programs.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1. The institution implements the extension agenda.
32
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
I.2. The institution contributes to the achievement of local/ regional/
national priorities (e.g., poverty alleviation, environmental
management, health) through academic and non-academic
programs.
I.3. The institution promotes dialogue with professional organizations,

industry, and other external groups, such as government and non-
government organizations, socio-civic and religious groups.
I.4. The institution responds to changing patterns and requirements of

employment as well as to the needs of the community.
I.5. The faculty and assigned staff, students and the community are
involved in the planning, conduct and evaluation of the activities and
projects to implement the extension agenda.
OUTCOME/S
O.1. Relevant extension/outreach programs/projects are made
available to the community.
O.2. Extension/Outreach programs make an impact in the lives of

beneficiaries.
Best Practices:
PARAMETER B: NETWORKING AND LINKAGES

S.1 The institution has a program for promoting networking and linkages
with local and international agencies/ institutions.
S.2 There are adequate funding and administrative support to pursue

links with other agencies work.
33
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1 The partner agencies and consortium arrangements contribute to the
implementation of the curricular, research and extension programs of
the institutions.
I.3 The institution participates in academic and non-academic networks

at program and institutional levels.
I.5 The institution benefits from its partnerships, e.g., through

acquisition of expertise and funding.
I.7 The institution maintains strong links with industry, peer institutions,
and funding agencies to strengthen its curricular offerings, forge
mutually beneficial arrangements along research, extension,
faculty/student exchange and graduate employability.
I.9 The Institution maintains effective links with local governments,

community organizations and educational institutions, and these are
used to define priorities for extension program.
OUTCOME/S
O.1. Partnerships are sustained.
O.2. The community strongly support the institutions programs.
Best Practices:
Total Rating:
Area Mean:
34
Improvement):
Recommendations
1.
2.
45
AREA VI
SUPPORT to STUDENTS
PARAMETERS
A. Recruitment, Admission and Academic Support
B. Student Scholarships
C. Student Services
D. Placement Support
SUC :
Campus :
AREA VI: SUPPORT TO STUDENTS
RATING SCALE
NA 0 1 2 3 4 5
respects, but much some improvement is level that substantial
Improvement is needed to overcome demonstrates good number of good
needed to overcome weaknesses practice practices, at a
weaknesses level that provides
a model for others
Parameter Mean
Item Rating (IR)
Implementation –
System –
(PM)
Indicators
PARAMETER A: Recruitment, Admission and Academic Support

S.1. The institution adopts a program and procedures for the selection of
prospective students, and the retention of the most deserving.
S.2. There is a well-organized, properly administered and adequately

staffed student services unit.
S.3. The institution has a system to identify the special learning needs of
students.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1. The institution recruits and selects students based on clear policies
and operational guidelines.
I.3. The institution provides counseling, academic advising and other

intervention measures.
35
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
I.5. There are programs that provide for orientation of new and old
students.
I.7. The institution admits students from special groups (e.g., financially
disadvantaged, tribal groups, physically challenged) and ensures that
they are given fair consideration.
OUTCOME/S
O.1. Admission policies provide fair access to education.
O.2. Rate of retention and completion are consistently high.
Best Practices:
PARAMETER B: STUDENT SCHOLARSHIPS
S.1. The institution has a well-defined and sustainable scholarship

program and grants which enable beneficiaries to complete their
studies successfully within the prescribed period.
S.2. Deserving students get an education through the institution’s

scholarship programs, which include various groups of beneficiaries,
including special groups.
S.3. Resources are available to support beneficiaries throughout the

duration of studies.
S.4. There is a system that monitors the performance of graduates to

ensure that the scholarship program is working as expected.
IMPLEMENTATION
36
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
I.1. Deserving students are selected based on eligibility criteria and
procedures for the award of scholarships and study grants.
I.3. Benefits are maximized through guidance and the scholarships
awarded to the students.
I.5. Scholarships facilitate the completion of degrees sometimes even

ahead of the prescribed period.
I.7. Scholarship programs are periodically evaluated and revised as

needed.
OUTCOME/S
O.1. Graduates enter employment that are appropriate to the aims of
the scholarship program.
O.2. Student quality is ascertained because of adherence to scholarship

guidelines.
O.3. Diversity of student population is visible because of the different

interests of the students in activities participated in.
O.4. Rate of completion is higher for scholars.
O.5. Employment rate is 70% higher for high academic performers.
O.6. Performance of graduates as grantees in Board Examinations is

consistently high.
Best Practices:
PARAMETER C: STUDENT SERVICES

37
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
NON - ACADEMIC SUPPORT
S.1. There exists a functional guidance program and services available to
all students needing assistance that ensures maximum benefit
from the support they receive.
S.3. There are structures that address immediate needs of students.
S.5. An effective employment and placement program is available
S.7. A system of monitoring student performance is maintained.
S.9. A publication unit that provides an avenue for students’ expression

and accomplishment exists.
S.11.A system to evaluate and monitor the student services program

implementation is in place.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1. Students are active participants in major committees and policy-
making bodies particularly those affecting student welfare and
development.
I.3. Students avail themselves of the programs offered in the student

services unit.
I.5. Students are active in student organizations and publication.
I.7. The institution provides opportunities for student participation in

program planning and policy formulation.
I.9. The institution adequately provides a variety of services to promote

health, spiritual, and socio-cultural development of the students
while completing their studies.
I.11.Evaluation and monitoring of service program implementation is
38
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
regularly done.
OUTCOME/S
O.1. Special programs help enhance the students’ development, including
management of discipline.
O.2. Leadership qualities of students are demonstrated by the

participation in various fora and awards received in various
competitions.
O.3. A certain level of empowerment is manifested in student

participation in decision - making and opportunities for self-
improvement.
Best Practices:
PARAMETER D: PLACEMENT SUPPORT

S.1. The program is managed by competent staff.
S.3. A system of monitoring the employment and performance of

graduates is maintained.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1. The institution exposes students to a wide range of opportunities to
develop their potential.
I.2. The institution has links with employers to facilitate placement
39
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
opportunities.
OUTCOME/S
O.1. Students are able to plan for their career/future through career
orientation and job placement programs.
O.2. High level of performance of students in schooling and on – the - job

training.
O.3. The placement program improves the percentage of employed

graduates.
Best Practices:
Total Rating:
Area Mean:
40
Improvement):
Recommendations
1.
2.
AREA VII
LIBRARY
PARAMETERS
A. Administration
B. Personnel
C. Collection Development, Organization and Preservation
D. Services and Utilization
E. Physical Set-Up and Facilities
F. Financial Support
G. Linkages
SUC :
Campus :
AREA VII: LIBRARY
RATING SCALE
NA 0 1 2 3 4 5
for others
Parameter Mean
Item Rating (IR)
Implementation –
System –
(PM)
Indicators
PARAMETER A: ADMINISTRATION
S.1. The organizational structure of the institution’s library is well-defined.

1
S.2. The development of the library mission and goals is the responsibility
1 of the library head and staff with the approval of the Head of the
institution.
S.3. There is an institutions Library Board/Committee which:
S.3.1 sets library policies, rules and procedures; and
S.3.2 reviews the same annually.
S.4. There is a duly approved and widely disseminated Library Manual

which contains written policies and procedures covering the library’s
internal administration and operational activities.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.35.The library develops an explicit statement of its mission in conformity
41
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
with the mandate of the institution.
I.37. The library is administered and supervised by:
I.38.1.full-time professional (licensed) librarian; and
I.38.2.at least a master’s degree holder in MS Library and

Information Science or MAEd/MA in Library Science.
I.39. The Head Librarian directs and supervises the total operation of the
library, and is responsible for the administration of its resources and
services.
I.41. The Head Librarian, preferably with a teaching plantilla position ,

actively participates in the academic and administrative activities of
the institution.
I.43. The annual accomplishment and other reports of the library are
promptly submitted to the higher offices concerned.
I.45. An institution’s Library Development Plan is prepared in consultation

with the institution’s officials and stakeholders.
OUTCOME/S
O.1. Evidence that the mission, goals and library objectives are
satisfactorily attained.
O.2. The organizational structure is well-designed and effectively followed.
Best Practices:
42
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
PARAMETER B: PERSONNEL
S.1. The library has staff and personnel with the following qualifications:
S.1.1. BS in Library and Information Science for the Academic

Unit/College Library; and
S.1.2. MS in Library and Information Science or MAED/MA in

Library Science) for the University/Institution Library.
S.4. The library meets the required number of qualified and licensed
librarians and support staff of the SUC as defined in its Qualification
Standards for Personnel to meet the needs of its population,
curricular offerings, teaching methods, research and extension
activities, size and scope of the collection and rate of circulation with
the ratio of:
S. one (1) Professional Librarian with two (2) full time clerical
S.1. staff for the first 500 - student population; and
S.2.
S.2.1.
S.2.2. one (1) additional full time Professional Librarian with one
(1) full time clerical and other support staff for every
additional 1,000 students.
S.3. There is a continuing staff development program with the

corresponding financial assistance from the institution’s GAA and/or
utilization of Income.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.49.The library personnel’s compensation, retirement, and fringe benefits,

as well as other privileges, are granted in accordance with existing
government laws and institutional policies in conformity with CSS.
43
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
OUTCOME/S
O.1. Highly qualified librarians are hired as per institutional recruitment

policies and standards.
Best Practices:
PARAMETER C: COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT, ORGANIZATION AND

PRESERVATION
S.1. There is a written Collection Development Policy which is well defined

in the Library Manual.
S.3. There is a core collection of at least:
S.4.1. 5,000 titles for the Academic Unit Library; or
S.4.2.10,000 titles that support the instruction, research and

other programs for an Institution Library.
S.4.3.For periodical titles

Enrollment No. of periodical titles
Less than 1000 students 50 titles
1001 – 3000 students 75 titles
Over 3000 students 100 titles
S.5. Twenty percent (20%) of the library holdings are of current edition, i.e.
with copyright within the last 5 years.
S.7. There is provision for non-print, digital and electronic resources made
accessible through sufficient hardware/equipment.
44
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
S.9.There is an available integrated library system that facilitates the
organization’s access and retrieval of library resources.
S.11.Provisions are made for the preservation, general care, and upkeep of
library resources.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1. The Collection Development Policy Statement is regularly reviewed

and evaluated by the Institution’s Library Committee.
I.3. The library collection and services support the mission and vision of
the Institution, goals of the Academic Unit and objectives of the
Program.
I.5. The library provides sufficient research books and materials to

supplement the clientele’s curricular needs.
I.7. The library maintains an extensive (15% of the total) Filipiniana

collection.
I.9. The library provides five (5) book titles for professional subjects in the
major fields of specialization and a regular annual subscription of 3
journal titles of undergraduate program, 6 journal titles of graduate
program and 10 journal titles of doctoral program for every major field
of specialization.
I.11.The collection is organized according to an accepted scheme of

classification and standard code of cataloging.
I.13.Conduct of regular weeding program is conducted to maintain a

relevant and updated collection
I.15.The quality and quantity of library materials/resources conform with

the standards set for a particular academic program.
OUTCOME/S
O.1.Core collection is adequate, updated and well-balanced.
45
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
O.2. Professional books, journals and electronic resources for the SUC
library are very adequate particularly in preparation for Licensure
Exam.
Best Practices:
PARAMETER D: SERVICES AND UTILIZATION
S.1. The Library has information services pertinent to the institution’s

information requirements.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.53.The following services/programs are provided:
I.54.1. functional and interactive library web page;
I.55.1. integrated library system;
I.56.1. On-line public access (OPAC);
I.57.1. circulation on-line;
I.58.1. computerized cataloging;
I.59.1. inventory reporting;
46
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
I.60.1. serials control;
I.61.1. internet searching;
I.61.2. CDROM services;
I.61.3. on-line database;
I.61.4. photocopying; and
I.61.5. bar coding.
I.62.The library opens for at least 54 hours per week for the Academic
Unit or 60 hours per week for the Institution with clear budgetary
allocation.
I.64.The library promotes and disseminates its program through a regular

announcement of its new acquisitions of print materials (books,
journals, magazines), resources, facilities, and services.
I.66.Librarians/staff are available during library hours to assist and provide

library services to users in consideration of no noon break policy of the
SUC.
I.68.Annual/Yearly statistical data on the utilization of various resources

and services are compiled and used to improve the library collection
OUTCOME/S
O.1. Effective and efficient utilization of the library services is efficient and
effective.
O.2. User satisfaction is at a high level.
Best Practices:
47
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
PARAMETER E: PHYSICAL SET-UP AND FACILITIES

Location and site
S.1. The library is strategically located and is accessible to students, faculty
and other clientele.
S.3. The library is systematically planned and structured to allow future

expansion of :
S.
S.1.
S.2.
S.2.1. old site; and
S.3.1. new campus/es.
Space Requirement
S.6. The size of the library meets standard requirements considering

present enrollment and future expansion.
S.8. The reading room can accommodate at least 10% of the school
enrollment at any given time.
S.11.Space is provided for print resources as well as work stations for

electronic resources.
S.13.Space is provided for the librarians’ office, staff room, technical room,
etc.
S.16.Ramps for the physically disabled are provided.
48
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
Furniture and Equipment
S.19.The library meets the required and standard-sized furniture and

equipment.
S.21.The following library furniture and equipment are available:
S.23.1. adjustable/movable shelves;
S.24.1. magazine display shelves;
S.25.1. newspaper racks;
S.26.1. standard tables and chairs;
S.27.1. carrels for individual study;
S.28.1. desks and chairs for staff;
S.29.1. charging desk;
S.30.1. dictionary stand;
S.31.1. atlas stand;
S.32.1. bulletin boards and display cabinets;
S.33.1. vertical file cabinets;
49
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
S.34.1. book racks;
S.35.1. map stands/cabinets;
S.36.1. cardex/ rotadex or any filing equipment for periodical

records;
S.37.1. typewriters;
S.38.1. computers with printers; and
S.39.1. others.
Physical Provisions for Reading
S.41. The library is well lighted.
S.43. The library is well-ventilated
S.45. The atmosphere is conducive to learning.
Security/Control
S.47. Fire extinguishers and a local fire alarm system are available.
S.49. The library employs a system for security and control of library
resources.
IMPLEMENTATION
50
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
I.1. IT software and multi-media equipment are utilized.
OUTCOME/S
O.1. Environment is conducive to learning.
O.2. The Library is well maintained and aesthetically designed with state-
of-the-art library facilities
Best Practices:
PARAMETER F: FINANCIAL SUPPORT
S.1. The Institution has a regular and realistic budget for the library.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1. The Head Librarian and staff, in coordination with other officials of the
Institution, prepare and manage the annual library budget.
I.3. All fees and funds allocated for library resources and services are
utilized solely for such purposes and are properly audited.
I.5. Other sources of financial assistance are sought.
OUTCOME/S
51
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
O.1. Financial support is adequate from fiduciary, supplemental and
external funds as follows:
O.1.1. alumni: and
O.3.1. foreign countries/Asia Foundation, others
Best Practices:
PARAMETER G: LINKAGES
S.1. The Library is on the mailing list of agencies, foundations, etc., for
exchange of publications and other books/journals donations.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1. Linkages with other institutions and funding agencies are explored and
established for purposes of enhancing library facilities and resources.
The library establishes consortia, networking, resource sharing and

I.3.
conduct of cooperative activities with other institutions and libraries.
OUTCOME/S
O.1. Resource sharing and linkages are well-established.
52
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
Best Practices:
Total Rating:
Area Mean:
53
AREA VII - LIBRARY
Improvement):
Recommendations
1.
2.
AREA VIII
INFRASTRUCTURE and other LEARNING RESOURCES
PARAMETERS
A. School Campus/Site
B. Infrastructure
C. Laboratories and Shops
D. Non-Print, Digital and Electronic Resources
SUC :
Campus :
AREA VIII: INFRASTRUCTURE AND OTHER LEARNING RESOURCES
RATING SCALE
NA 0 1 2 3 4 5
for others
Parameter Mean
Item Rating (IR)
Implementation –
System –
(PM)
Indicators
PARAMETER A: SCHOOL CAMPUS/SITE

S.46 The school campus/site meets the requirements on location,
accessibility, topography, soil condition, size and disaster/risk
reduction.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1. Current policies on environmental management and sustainable
development approaches are evident and cascaded into the faculty,
students and stakeholders.
I.3. The existing school site complies with the national standard
requirements set by the government
I.5. The institution conducts periodic analysis of water quality and
disposes its wastes properly.
OUTCOME/S
O.1. Campus-related accidents are minimal.
53
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
O.2. Campus is adaptable to changes in climate and resilient to tremors
and storms.
O.3. Campus environment and landscape are impressive and well-

maintained.
O.4. Permanence of the academic campus and buildings in the present

site is ensured.
O.5. Number of guest lecturers/visitors/students visiting the campus or

doing academic work has improved/increased.
O.6. The campus usually gets the praise of everyone who visits it.
Best Practices:
PARAMETER B: INFRASTRUCTURE
NON ACADEMIC SUPPORT
S.1. There are adequate buildings and provisions for classrooms, offices,
staff rooms, study areas, clinics, student center, cafeteria, food
outlets, comfort rooms and other amenities equipped with needed
facilities.
S.1.1. The existing school infrastructure and facilities meet the
academic, administrative and other needs of the
institution.
S.1.2. School infrastructures conform to standards of comfort

to students, faculty, staff and other stakeholders with
special needs.
S.3. The institution has a system for periodic maintenance, repair and
upkeep of its buildings and facilities.
54
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
S.5. There are trained manpower to handle maintenance, repair and
upkeep works.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1. There is optimum utilization of existing infrastructure and facilities by
faculty and students.
I.3. Funds are allocated for the repair and maintenance of buildings and
facilities.
I.5. The institution regularly monitors the condition of its buildings and
facilities to within fully functional status.
I.7. School infrastructures are built in compliance with national standards

in terms of design; strength to withstand earthquakes, typhoons, fire
hazards and other natural and man-made calamities; or other
operational requirements such as sanitary permits, building
certificates, environmental compliance, etc.
I.9. The existing school infrastructures are periodically monitored and

improved to meet the current and emerging needs of education and
training.
I.11.Risk identification and analysis; and control activities are conducted

and properly documented.
OUTCOME/S
O.1. Improved faculty and student performance are based on
student/faculty satisfaction.
O.2. Accidents due to infrastructure are minimal.
O.3. Stakeholders are proud of and happy about the school facilities.
Best Practices:
55
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
PARAMETER C: LABORATORIES AND SHOPS
S.1. There are adequate and properly maintained laboratories and shops
to support the academic programs of the institution.
S.3. Laboratories and shop rooms are equipped with functional tools,
equipment, supplies and materials to support student learning.
S.5. Adequate funds are available for the proper maintenance of

laboratories and shops.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1. Equipment/tools and supplies/materials in the laboratories and
shops are regularly checked and cleaned.
I.2. There are provisions to minimize exposure to risks and to prevent

accidents in the laboratories and workshops.
I.3. A well-placed and marked emergency materials are strategically

located in the laboratories and shops.
I.4. Laboratories and shops have two doors that open out for ease of
movement during emergency.
OUTCOME/S
O.1. Faculty and students’ productivity are improved because of their
access to laboratories and shop room facilities that may be needed to
learn particular skills in the program.
O.2. The good condition of classrooms, offices and laboratories and other
facilities are contributory to the achievement of desired learning outcomes.
56
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
O.3. There is minimal danger of accidents occurring in laboratories and
shop rooms.
Best Practices:
PARAMETER D: NON-PRINT, DIGITAL AND ELECTRONIC RESOURCES

S.1. Provisions for non-print, digital and electronic resources are available
S.2. Funds are budgeted for purchase of non-print, digital and electronic
resources.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1. Memos issued regarding provisions for non-print, digital and
electronic resources are religiously followed.
I.2. Purchase of updated non-print, digital and electronic resources is

regularly done.
OUTCOME/S
O.1. Completed projects and compilation of lectures are promptly
reported and submitted.
O.2. Faculty and staff have better presentations and up-to-date reports.
Best Practices:
57
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
Total Rating:
Area Mean:
58
AREA VIII – INFRASTRUCTURE AND OTHER LEARNING RESOURCES
Improvement):
Recommendations
1.
2.
AREA IX
QUALITY ASSURANCE CULTURE
PARAMETERS
A. Planning
B. Structure of Quality Assurance
C. Monitoring and Evaluation of Quality Assurance
D. Sustainability of Quality Assurance
SUC :
Campus :
AREA IX: QUALITY ASSURANCE CULTURE
RATING SCALE
NA 0 1 2 3 4 5
for others
Parameter Mean
Item Rating (IR)
Implementation –
System –
(PM)
Indicators
PARAMETER A: PLANNING
S.1. The Institution has a definite policy on quality assurance.
S.2. The institution has a broad access and assessment of the external
environment.
S.3. There are defined processes and strategies of quality assurance

based on the policy.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1 The policies are translated into specific plans for improving the
quality of academic programs.
I.3 The quality assurance policies are operationalized for effective
governance and management.
I.5 The policies are operationalized in the form of definite procedures.
59
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
I.7 The quality assurance projects/activities are implemented in
accordance with the quality assurance plan.
OUTCOME/S
O.1. There is a well-designed Quality Assurance Plan.
O.2. Manual of Procedures on Quality Assurance is functional.
O.3. An Institution that blends with the environment and meets the
development of the environment is observed.
O.4. The institution has a well coordinated planning and implementation

of the quality assurance programs.
Best Practices:
PARAMETER B: STRUCTURE OF QUALITY ASSURANCE

S.1. The institution has an Organizational Structure that stipulates the
internalization of positions for the pursuance of mandate.
S.3. The Quality Assurance Office is staffed with qualified personnel.
S.5. There are resources allocated for quality assurance activities.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1. The QA Office regularly prepares the plan, schedules, reports, etc.
needed for operations, quality assurance and related assessment.
I.3. The QA Office initiates the orientation of the University/College

stakeholders on quality assurance matters.
60
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
I.5. The QA Office efficiently manages the quality assurance visits.
OUTCOME/S
O.1. A competent unit that plans and manages quality assurance activities
is institutionalized.
O.2. Stakeholders have high confidence in the SUC’s quality assurance

managers.
O.3. The Institution is viewed as a mirror of high quality education.
Best Practices:
PARAMETER C: MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF QUALITY ASSURANCE

S.1. A unit to monitor and evaluate QA activities and reports is in place.
S.3. There is a well-defined process in monitoring and evaluating QA

reports.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1. The QA Unit or staff receive or solicit QA reports.
I.3. Progress reports are made and submitted to appropriate officials.
I.5. The accreditation reports are periodically evaluated and results are
disseminated to officials concerned.
I.7. Procedures are cross-checked with acceptable standards.
61
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
OUTCOME/S
O.1. Quality assurance activities are up-to-date.
O.2. Stakeholders have confidence in the progress of the Institution’s

march toward the development of a culture of quality.
O.3. The image of the institution is enhanced.
Best Practices:
PARAMETER D: SUSTAINABILITY OF QUALITY ASSURANCE

S.1. A Quality Assurance Unit exists as a regular academic structure in the
SUC organization.
S.3. There are appointed or designated faculty/staff who perform the

functions of the QA unit.
S.5. Funds are regularly allocated for the operation of the Unit.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1. All units adopt and implement QA standards in their respective fields
of specialization.
I.3. The Governing Board and the Administration support the operation
of the QA Unit and the projects on quality assurance.
I.5. The QA staff perform their duties efficiently and effectively.
62
Indicators
PM
SIO
IR
M
I.7. Quality Assurance activities are efficiently managed by its staff.
I.9. Most of the faculty assigned to the QA Body are also External
Accreditors for other educational institutions.
I.11.QA reports are used in decision-making.
OUTCOME/S
O.1. Officials and other stakeholders are well-enlightened on the status of
the quality of the institution and its programs.
O.2. At least 75% of the curricular programs are accredited.
O.3. There is high morale and sense of achievement among the Officials,
Faculty, Staff and students of the SUC.
O.4. Meritorious awards are given to the institution, namely; COD, COE,
Top Performing Institution, etc.
O.5. A culture of quality is discernable as a way of life in the institution.
Best Practices:
Total Rating:
Area Mean:
63
Improvement):
Recommendations
1.
2.

Outcomes-Based Institutional Accreditation Instrument

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Outcomes-Based Institutional Accreditation Instrument

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Outcomes-Based Institutional Accreditation Instrument

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PHILIPPINES COPYRIGHT 2014

by the Accrediting Agency of Chartered Colleges

Survey Instrument for Institutional Accreditation

Printed in the Philippines by

All rights reserved.

This Institutional Outcomes – Based Accreditation Instrument of the Accrediting

1) Governance and Management;

2) Teaching, Learning and Evaluation;

3) Faculty and Staff;

5) Extension and Consultancy and Linkages;

8) Infrastructure and Learning Resources; and

9) Quality Assurance Culture.

- - Poor Fair Satisfactory Very Satisfactory Excellent

PARAMETER A: GOVERNANCE – ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

S.2 The powers, functions/duties and responsibilities of key officials are

S.3 Administrative and academic councils/bodies exist to assist in

I.2. The key officials follow the functional relationship structure in

I.4. The Administrative and Academic Councils function effectively.

O.2. Conflict in administrative jurisdictions and official relationships are

O.3. Stakeholders feel satisfied in the management of the institution.

O.4. Stronger cooperation and coordination among individuals and units

O.5. The governing body demonstrates integrity and objectivity in all

O.6. Various stakeholders express satisfaction with openness and

SYSTEM – INPUTS AND PROCESSES

1. Guidelines and protocols are in place.

2. Major policies and decisions are available.

I.15.Stakeholders receive timely information on policies, guidelines and

2. Management and other stakeholders are able to make sound

PARAMETER C: GOVERNANCE -STRATEGIC VISION

SYSTEM – INPUTS AND PROCESSES

S.3. The strategic plan is consistent with the institutional vision/mission.

S.6. Planning system is in place.

I.3. The implementation of the strategic plan is anchored on the

I.5. The institution implements the Strategic Plan and periodically

I.7. Stakeholders support the Strategic Plan because various sectors

I.9. Programs and projects geared towards achieving the institution’s

O.2.There is a demonstrable information to indicate continual stability

PARAMETER D: GOVERNANCE –ACCOUNTABILITY

S.3. There are systems for monitoring and evaluation to ensure

S.5. Stakeholders are aware of the laws and rules on Government

I.3. Appropriate actions are done to address findings in internal/external

O.3. Accounting of funds is robust

O.5. There is unqualified Annual Audit Report.

O.7. Disallowances are minimal.

O.9. Required reports are prepared and submitted on time.

PARAMETER E: GOVERNANCE -AWARENESS AND MANAGEMENT OF RISK

S.2. A finance team studies, manages, and evaluates major financial

PARAMETER F: GOVERNANCE -EFFECTIVE MONITORING OF

O.3.Institutional sustainability is promoted through:

O.3.1. the strategic management of the institution’s land,

O.3.2. the institution’s employment policies;

O.3.3. arrangements for consideration of student grievances,

O.3.5. procedures to safeguard the health and safety of

PARAMETER G: MANAGEMENT AND FINANCIAL CONTROL

S.3. A mechanism for effective monitoring and control of income-

I.2. Concerned officials, faculty, staff and students participate in budget

I.3. Resources are allocated to authorized expenditures to implement

I.4. The institution is able to communicate with its key stakeholders.

O.2.The budget of the institution is well-prepared, judiciously allocated,

O.3.Systems and processes reflect sound management, financial control,