Testing AGN Outflow and Accretion Models With C IV and He II Emission Line Demographics in 2 Quasars
Testing AGN Outflow and Accretion Models With C IV and He II Emission Line Demographics in 2 Quasars
Testing AGN Outflow and Accretion Models With C IV and He II Emission Line Demographics in 2 Quasars
Matthew J. Temple ,1★ James H. Matthews ,2,3 Paul C. Hewett ,3 Amy L. Rankine ,4
Gordon T. Richards ,5 Manda Banerji ,6 Gary J. Ferland ,7 Christian Knigge 6 and Matthew Stepney 6
1 Instituto de Estudios Astrofísicos, Universidad Diego Portales, Av. Ejército Libertador 441, Santiago 8370191, Chile
2 Department of Physics, Astrophysics, University of Oxford, Denys Wilkinson Building, Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3RH, UK
3 Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK
arXiv:2301.02675v1 [astro-ph.GA] 6 Jan 2023
4 Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UK
5 Department of Physics, Drexel University, 32 S. 32nd Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
6 School of Physics & Astronomy, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
7 Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA
ABSTRACT
Using ≈190,000 spectra from the seventeenth data release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, we investigate the ultraviolet
emission line properties in 𝑧 ≈ 2 quasars. Specifically, we quantify how the shape of C iv 𝜆1549 and the equivalent width (EW)
of He ii 𝜆1640 depend on the black hole mass and Eddington ratio inferred from Mg ii 𝜆2800. Above 𝐿/𝐿 Edd & 0.2, there is a
strong mass dependence in both C iv blueshift and He ii EW. Large C iv blueshifts are observed only in regions with both high
mass and high accretion rate. Including X-ray measurements for a subsample of 5,300 objects, we interpret our observations in
the context of AGN accretion and outflow mechanisms. The observed trends in He ii and 2 keV strength are broadly consistent
with theoretical qsosed models of AGN spectral energy distributions (SEDs) for low spin black holes, where the ionizing
SED depends on the accretion disc temperature and the strength of the soft excess. High spin models are not consistent with
observations, suggesting SDSS quasars at 𝑧 ≈ 2 may in general have low spins. We find a dramatic switch in behaviour at
𝐿/𝐿 Edd . 0.2: the ultraviolet emission properties show much weaker trends, and no longer agree with qsosed predictions,
hinting at changes in the structure of the broad line region. Overall the observed emission line trends are generally consistent
with predictions for radiation line driving where quasar outflows are governed by the SED, which itself results from the accretion
flow and hence depends on both the SMBH mass and accretion rate.
Key words: quasars: emission lines
1 INTRODUCTION ploring the properties which are observed to vary the most. Such
diversity in the observed quantities must ultimately be driven by
1.1 Observational context: spectroscopic properties of quasars some of the physics which we would like to use to better constrain
The spectroscopic properties of type-1 quasars have long been appre- both the growth of SMBHs and their effect on the galactic ecosystems
ciated for their potential to provide insight into the physical processes in which they reside. The most famous result of these investigations
responsible for luminous active galactic nuclei (AGN; Baldwin & is arguably the identification of the so-called ‘eigenvector 1’ (EV1),
Netzer 1978; Davidson & Netzer 1979; Kwan & Krolik 1981; Krolik which accounts for the largest amount of correlated variance in the
& Kallman 1988; Elvis 2000). These processes include the excitation optical spectra of low-redshift (𝑧 < 1) type-1 AGN spectra. Most
of various line- and continuum-emitting regions, and mechanisms authors now agree that the EV1 is driven by the mass-normalised
for launching outflows which might ‘feed back’ energy to their host accretion rate (the Eddington ratio), possibly convolved with some
galaxies. Such processes are ultimately powered by accretion onto orientation effect (Boroson & Green 1992; Wills et al. 1999; Sulentic
supermassive black holes (SMBHs; Lynden-Bell 1969), and thus de- et al. 2000; Shen & Ho 2014; Sun & Shen 2015; Sulentic & Marziani
pend primarily on the mass of the SMBH and the accretion rate, with 2015; Wolf et al. 2020).
potential second-order drivers including the spin of the SMBH and
Similarly, the ultraviolet emission features in quasar spectra also
the metal content of the accreting material.
show a rich phenomenology (Croom et al. 2002; Jensen et al. 2016;
The search for insight has gained much from identifying and ex-
Brodzeller & Dawson 2022). Early work by Baldwin (1977) showed
that the equivalent widths (EWs) of various ultraviolet lines, most
notably C iv 𝜆1549, were anti-correlated with the ultraviolet contin-
★ E-mail: [email protected] uum luminosity. Shang et al. (2003) showed that this ‘Baldwin effect’
1044
100
200
10−1
100 10−1.1 < L/LEdd < 10−1.0
1043 109.7 < MBH /M < 109.8
1042
3 CIV HeII
1700Å
fλ /f
2
HeII
10−1.6 < L/LEdd < 10−1.5
CIV 108.9 < MBH /M < 109.0 MgII
1
41
1500 1550 1600 1650 10
1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000
Rest Wavelength [Å] Rest Wavelength [Å]
Figure 1. Top left panel: the distribution of our sample of 191 391 quasars with redshifts 1.5 < 𝑧 < 2.65 in the 𝑀BH –𝐿/𝐿Edd plane. Throughout this work, we
only consider hexagonal bins where there are five or more quasars per bin. By construction, the FWHM of Mg ii 𝜆2800 increases from top-left to bottom-right
of this parameter space, while the 3000 Å continuum luminosity increases from bottom-left to top-right. Right panel: composite spectra taken from different
regions of the 𝑀BH –𝐿/𝐿Edd plane, as indicated by coloured boxes in the top left panel. A diversity of emission line properties is seen with changing SMBH
mass and Eddington ratio. Bottom left panel: comparing the composite spectra in the region around C iv 𝜆1549 and He ii 𝜆1640. Here the spectra have been
normalised at 1700 Å and plotted on a linear y-axis. The EW of He ii can be seen to correlate with the profile of C iv: the high-mass, high-Eddington composite
in blue displays weak lines and blueshifted C iv while the low-mass, high-Eddington composite in green shows much stronger line emission with no blue excess
in C iv, consistent with fig. 11 of Richards et al. (2011) and fig. A2 of Rankine et al. (2020). The difference here is that, instead of being constructed from C iv
or C iii] emission properties, objects were included based on the FWHM of Mg ii and 𝐿3000 to represent regions of the 𝑀BH –𝐿/𝐿Edd plane, and also that the
larger sample from SDSS DR17 includes fainter objects such as those contributing to the composite in red. Composite spectra spanning the full range of the
𝑀BH –𝐿/𝐿Edd space will be made available as supplemental online-only material with the journal.
shifts are calculated as described in section 3 of Rankine et al. (2020). ≥3.0 over the rest-frame interval 1700-2200 Å. These criteria leave
Our redshift estimation routine uses the rest-frame 1600-3000 Å re- a sample of 191 391 quasars.
gion, deliberately excluding the C iv emission line, which is a key To compute the EW of C iv emission, a power law continuum is de-
difference compared to the approach employed in the SDSS quasar fined using the median flux in the 1445-1465 and 1700-1705 Å wave-
catalogues. The improved redshifts and sky-subtracted spectra will be length windows. This continuum is then subtracted from the spec-
described in a forthcoming publication by P. C. Hewett. To measure trum to isolate the line flux in the 1500-1600 Å wavelength region.
the emission line properties, we employ the spectral reconstructions The He ii EW is measured in the same way across the 1620-1650 Å
from the Mean-Field Independent Component Analysis (ICA) car- wavelength region, using windows at 1610-1620 and 1700-1705 Å to
ried out by Rankine et al. (2020), which we have successfully used in define the continuum model. The C iv emission line ‘blueshift’ is de-
our previous investigations into quasar emission line physics (Tem- fined as the Doppler shift of the wavelength bisecting the continuum-
ple et al. 2020, 2021a,b). The ICA-reconstructions provide a signif- subtracted line flux:
icant improvement in the measurement of emission line properties,
𝜆 rest − 𝜆 median
reducing the impact of the modest signal-to-noise ratio in the origi- C iv blueshift ≡ 𝑐 × (1)
𝜆rest
nal spectra and the effect of weak absorption lines (e.g. intervening
or outflowing C iv 𝜆𝜆1548,1550 doublets). We exclude objects with where 𝑐 is the speed of light, 𝜆median is the rest-frame wavelength
broad low-ionization absorption features (LoBALs) and poor ICA of the observed line centroid, and 𝜆rest = 1549.48 Å is the mean
reconstructions. To include both C iv and Mg ii in the observed spec- rest-frame wavelength of the C iv 𝜆𝜆1548.19,1550.77 doublet.
trum, we limit our sample to redshifts 1.5 < 𝑧 < 2.65. Spectra from
before the start of the BOSS survey (MJD 55000) were observed 2.2 X-ray data
using the original SDSS spectrograph which had a more limited
wavelength coverage; for these objects we require 1.6 < 𝑧 < 2.2 to In addition to the rest-frame ultraviolet emission features, we can
ensure coverage of C iv and Mg ii. The spectra of quasars are required use the rest-frame 2 keV X-ray continuum emission to gain further
to possess a mean signal-to-noise ratio (per 69 km s−1 SDSS pixel) insight into the spectral energy distributions of the quasars in our
sample. We therefore cross-match our sample of 191 391 objects
to various X-ray catalogues from the literature, in order to build a
of this paper change if the original DR17 reductions of the spectra are used large sample of rest-frame 2 keV measurements. 4189 objects from
instead. our sample of 1.5 < 𝑧 < 2.65 objects with ultraviolet spectra are
ṁ
1045
Although the emission line properties must depend on the ioniz-
ing SED, the exact relationship between, for example, C iv EW and 10−1
the SED is complex due to a number of confounding factors such as
BLR geometry, density and radiative transfer. The relationship to any 1044
kinematic signatures such as C iv blueshift is even more complicated
and would require a physical model for the line formation region and
associated flow dynamics. A somewhat simpler case is the EW of
He ii 𝜆1640, which is a recombination line and therefore a reasonable 1047 1010
MBH [M ]
indicative of a strong X-ray continuum. Assuming Case B recombi-
nation, Mathews & Ferland (1987) give the He ii 𝜆1640 EW in terms 109
1045
of the 228 Å continuum flux. Their equation can be inverted to give
the proportionality
𝐹𝜈 (𝜆228) Ω 1044
He II
∝ EW(He ii 𝜆1640) , (5)
𝐹𝜈 (𝜆1640) 4𝜋
αox
where Ω/4𝜋 is the covering fraction and the proportionality constant
is dependent on the shape of the SED (Mathews & Ferland 1987 108
1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019
considered a power law in 𝐹𝜈 at 228 Å). In this work we assume, ν (Hz)
based on the above equation, that the observed He ii 𝜆1640 EW is a
reasonable proxy for the ratio of continuum luminosities 𝐿 228 /𝐿 1640 . Figure 2. Output SEDs in 𝜈𝐿𝜈 units from qsosed for 𝑎∗ = 0 and cos 𝑖 = 0.5.
In Fig. 2 we present output SEDs from qsosed, in which the three The vertical lines show, from left to right, the frequencies at 2500 Å, 1640 Å,
radially stratified components can be seen as separate ‘bumps’ in 228 Å (= 54 eV) and 2 keV which together determine 𝛼ox and the EW of
the spectrum. In these plots, we show how the model SEDs change He ii 𝜆1640. The He ii ionization edge at 54 eV (1.3×1016 Hz) lies in the EUV
as a function of Eddington-scaled accretion rate, 𝑚¤ (for fixed mass, regime where the intermediate warm Comptonising component in qsosed is
top panel) and SMBH mass, 𝑀BH (for fixed 𝑚, ¤ bottom panel). The most important, but the EW of He ii can also be seen to depend on the location
important frequencies for determining He ii EW (corresponding to of the peak of the ionizing SED. Top panel: SEDs with fixed SMBH mass of
228 Å and 1640 Å) and 𝛼ox (corresponding to 2500 Å and 2 keV) are 109 𝑀 and varying 𝑚 ¤ in logarithmic intervals. As 𝑚 ¤ increases the peak of
the SED moves to the blue, the luminosity increases, and the hard X-ray power
marked. Increasing 𝑚¤ increases the overall luminosity of the system
law spectral index becomes softer. Bottom panel: SEDs with fixed 𝑚 ¤ = 0.15
and pushes the peak of the outer thermal disc component to higher
and varying 𝑀BH in logarithmic intervals. As SMBH mass increases the peak
frequencies. Simultaneously, the hard X-ray slope becomes signifi- of the SED moves to the red, and the luminosity increases. A maximal spin
cantly softer and 𝐿 2keV only increases slowly. As a result, the higher analogue to this plot is shown in Fig. D1.
Eddington fraction objects are more X-ray weak relative to their ul-
traviolet flux. Increasing 𝑀BH also increases the total luminosity, but
now the peak of the thermal component moves to lower frequencies stronger emission line blueshifts. However, when considering the
and the hard X-ray slope stays fairly constant. In both panels of the observed C iv properties as a function of both 𝑀BH and 𝐿/𝐿 Edd
plot the peak of the SED can be found on either side of the low (bottom panel), we see a more complicated behaviour. To observe
frequency pivot points for both He ii EW and 𝛼ox , resulting in an the strongest C iv blueshifts (which are associated with the smallest
interesting interplay between these quantities and the fundamental EWs), we need to look at objects with both 𝑀BH & 109 𝑀 and
AGN parameters. 𝐿/𝐿 Edd & 0.2. Moreover, the contours of constant C iv blueshift
follow acute-angled ‘wedge’ shapes, which are somewhat orthogonal
to lines of constant luminosity (running diagonally top-left to bottom-
4 RESULTS right in the 𝑀BH –𝐿/𝐿 Edd space). At the same time, objects with the
strongest C iv EWs & 100 Å, which have strong symmetric emission
4.1 Observed properties in 𝑀BH –𝐿/𝐿 Edd space
with little or no blueshift, are found at high 𝐿/𝐿 Edd & 0.2 and
The first observational result from this work is the behaviour of relatively low 𝑀BH . 109 𝑀 .
the C iv 𝜆1549 emission line morphology as a function of SMBH To help us to understand the physical drivers behind the trends
mass (𝑀BH ) and Eddington ratio (𝐿/𝐿 Edd ), shown in Fig. 3. In the seen in C iv, in Figs. 4 and 5 we also show 𝛼ox and He ii EW across
left panel, we show the C iv emission line blueshift (as defined in the same 𝑀BH –𝐿/𝐿 Edd parameter space. The 𝛼ox behaviour is as
Eq. 1) and in the right panel the EW of C iv. In the top panels, expected from previous works (e.g. Mitchell et al. 2022), largely with
consistent with previous works, we find that more luminous quasars more luminous objects displaying relatively weaker X-ray emission
show weaker emission line strengths relative to the continuum and which is quantified by a more negative 𝛼ox . A more interesting result
0
1047 1047
200
120
[erg s−1 ]
[erg s−1 ]
0
175
1046 1046
3000Å
3000Å
100
0
150
νLν |
νLν |
CIV λ1550 blueshift [km s ]
−1
1045 1045
0
100
100 100
60
750
L/LEdd
L/LEdd
500
10−1 10−1
40
250
10−2 10−2 20
0
Figure 3. The median observed C iv blueshift (left) and EW (right) in bins of SMBH mass, 3000 Å ultraviolet continuum luminosity (top) and Eddington ratio
(bottom). Data are shown only for bins which contain five or more objects. The C iv blueshift and EW are seen to anti-correlate: areas of parameter space with
strong blueshifts have weak EW and vice versa. 𝐿/𝐿Edd & 0.2 is a necessary but not sufficient condition for observing the largest C iv blueshifts. The strongest
C iv blueshifts are observed only at large SMBH mass and large Eddington ratio, while high EW C iv emission is observed at large Eddington ratio and smaller
mass. The Baldwin effect can be observed in the sense that objects with brighter 3000 Å luminosities tend to have weaker C iv EWs on average. However, the
C iv EW behaviour as a function of 𝑀BH and 𝐿/𝐿Edd shows that the underlying drivers of the Baldwin effect are more complicated than a simple dependence
on the ultraviolet luminosity.
is seen in the EW of He ii, which is even more striking than the 4.2 Comparison with model SEDs
behaviour seen in C iv. With the He ii EW, there is a clear transition
In the right-hand panels of Figs. 4 and 5 we show how 𝛼ox and
around 𝐿/𝐿 Edd ≈ 0.2, with both the strongest and weakest line
𝐿 228 /𝐿 1640 , respectively, vary with mass and Eddington fraction, as
emission only seen above this threshold. Below this Eddington limit,
modeled by qsosed. These plots can be compared to the respective
there is little change in the average line properties as a function
plots from the observational sample (left-hand panels), albeit with
of mass, but at 𝐿/𝐿 Edd & 0.2 there is a strong mass dependence
some caveats regarding bolometric corrections (Section 5.1.1) and
with diagonal wedge-shaped contours similar to those observed in
𝑀BH estimates (Section 5.1.2). In a qualitative sense, the models do
C iv. By contrast, the contours of constant 𝛼ox are much less closely
a reasonably good job of reproducing the trends observed in the data.
aligned with contours of constant C iv blueshift.
Focusing first on 𝛼ox , we can see that the general trend of decreasing
To test the robustness of these trends, we divide the 𝑀BH –𝐿/𝐿 Edd 𝛼ox with Eddington fraction is reproduced, and, in addition, the
into square bins of 0.1 by 0.1 dex and compute the median absolute gradient is stronger at high 𝑀BH , as observed in the data. To put
deviation (MAD) in each bin. The typical MAD is 290 km s−1 in this another way, in both the data and model results, the contour of
C iv blueshift, 13 Å in C iv EW and 0.5 Å in He ii EW. The typical fixed 𝛼ox curves around, from being nearly horizontal at high 𝑀BH
scatter within each bin is therefore significantly less than the dynamic to being closer to vertical at low 𝑀BH . The dynamic range of model
range in the average emission line properties shown in Figs. 3 and 𝛼ox values is comparable to that observed, but the models do not
5, meaning that one is unlikely to find individual objects which go produce soft enough spectra to match the data; 𝛼ox ≈ −1.9 can be
against the overall trend of the population. Dividing through by the found in some bins in the quasar sample but the minimum value of
median in each bin, the typical MAD/median in each bin is 0.29 𝛼ox in the models is −1.79.
and 0.24 for the He ii and C iv EWs respectively, meaning that the The comparison of the model 𝐿 228 /𝐿 1640 ratio and the observed
typical range of emission line EW within each 𝑀BH –𝐿/𝐿 Edd bin is He ii 𝜆1640 EW is also broadly encouraging, at least at relatively
a factor of 3.5 and 4 for He ii and C iv respectively, compared with high Eddington fractions. This finding is perhaps more interesting as
the dynamic range of more than a factor of six seen in the median the He ii EW is probing a portion of the SED that is not accessible
per-bin line properties. directly. The basic behaviour, of decreasing He ii EW with 𝑀BH at
−1.2 −1.2
1047 1047
[erg s−1 ]
[erg s−1 ]
−1.3 −1.3
1046 1046
3000Å
3000Å
−1.4 −1.4
ν Lν |
νLν |
1045 1045
−1.5 −1.5
αox
αox
100 100
−1.6 −1.6
L/LEdd
L/LEdd
−1.7 −1.7
10−1 10−1
−1.8 −1.8
10−2 10−2
108 109 1010 −1.9 108 109 1010 −1.9
MBH [M ] MBH [M ]
Figure 4. Left panel: The median observed 𝛼ox in bins of SMBH mass, 3000 Å ultraviolet continuum luminosity (top) and Eddington ratio (bottom) for the
5325 objects from our sample with 2 keV X-ray measurements. Data are shown only for bins which contain five or more objects. Right panel: the predicted 𝛼ox
from low spin qsosed models in the same parameter space. The observations show good agreement with the models, with 𝛼ox more negative (i.e. more X-ray
weak) in objects with brighter ultraviolet luminosities. In Fig. D1 we show equivalent models but with high spin, which do not show such agreement with the
observations, suggesting that the 𝑧 ≈ 2 SDSS quasar population may be more consistent with low SMBH spins on average.
high Eddington fractions, is well matched by the models. The models 5.1 Key assumptions and limitations
also capture the diagonal contours of constant He ii EW, in which
the transition to low He ii EWs occurs at higher masses for higher 5.1.1 Bolometric corrections
Eddington fractions. As discussed above, at low Eddington fractions A large part of this work has attempted to quantify the ‘unseen’ ex-
(𝐿/𝐿 Edd . 0.2), something fundamentally switches in the data, with treme ultraviolet (EUV) portion of the SED which is not directly
gradients generally being shallower and along a different direction in observable, but which can instead be probed via the He ii emission
the parameter space. This relatively sharp change is not reproduced line. This portion of the SED contributes a significant amount to the
by the models, and may be telling us something fundamental about bolometric luminosity of a quasar. To estimate bolometric luminosi-
the quasar accretion process (see Section 5.2.1 for a discussion). ties (and Eddington ratios 𝐿 bol /𝐿 Edd ), we have assumed a constant
bolometric correction 𝑓bol ≡ 𝐿 bol /𝐿 3000 of 5.15, consistent with
previous works in the literature (e.g. Richards et al. 2006; Krawczyk
et al. 2013). However, we have also shown that the He ii strength
is changing as a function of 𝑀BH and 𝐿/𝐿 Edd , so we expect the
strength of the EUV continuum and hence the bolometric correction
to be varying with 𝑀BH and 𝐿/𝐿 Edd . Using our qsosed models,
5 DISCUSSION
we attempt to quantify this effect in Fig. 6. While our chosen value
We have quantified the average behaviour of C iv 𝜆1549, He ii 𝜆1640 of 𝑓bol = 5.15 lies within the range of values spanned by our grid
and 𝛼ox as a function of both 𝑀BH and 𝐿/𝐿 Edd , and compared our of model SEDs, there is variation of around a factor of two in 𝑓bol
observations with predictions from qsosed models. In this section depending on the values of 𝑀BH and 𝐿/𝐿 Edd we consider. While
we now discuss these results. We first outline the key caveats in this could in principle lead to systematic biases in our estimation of
our findings (Sections 5.1.1 and 5.1.2), before discussing possible 𝐿/𝐿 Edd , we show in Appendix C that these biases are likely to be
interpretations of our results within the context of AGN accretion and small compared to the magnitude of the trends we observe.
outflow theories (Sections 5.2.1 and 5.2.2). Finally, we discuss some We can however, briefly describe what might happen if we were to
wider implications and possible future applications (Section 5.3), adopt a non-constant bolometric correction when inferring 𝐿/𝐿 Edd
before summarizing our key conclusions in Section 6. from our observations. For two objects, both at 𝑚¤ = 0.2, the 𝑓bol
1047 1047
[erg s−1 ]
[erg s−1 ]
0.1
4
1046 1046
3000Å
3000Å
ν Lν |
νLν |
1045 1045
L228 /L1640
2
0.06
100 100
L/LEdd
L/LEdd
1 0.04
10−1 10−1
0.03
10−2 10−2
108 109 1010 0.5 108 109 1010
MBH [M ] MBH [M ]
Figure 5. Left panel: The median observed He ii EW in bins of SMBH mass, 3000 Å ultraviolet continuum luminosity (top) and Eddington ratio (bottom).
Data are shown only for bins which contain five or more objects. Right panel: the predicted strength of He ii ionizing photons at 228 Å relative to the 1640 Å
continuum from qsosed models. Above an Eddington ratio of ≈0.2, there is a strong trend as a function of SMBH mass, with high mass objects showing the
weakest He ii emission and low mass objects showing the strongest He ii emission. The model predictions show qualitatively similar behaviour in this region of
parameter space, explaining the diagonal contours in constant He ii. Below 𝐿/𝐿Edd . 0.2, the observed He ii displays much weaker trends, and does not agree
with the model predictions, suggesting that in this regime either the SED models are less accurate or the structure of the BLR is changing.
inferred from the qsosed models would be ≈6 and ≈3 for 𝑀BH = us that any random scatter or noise in our 𝑀BH estimates is small
108 𝑀 and 1010 𝑀 respectively. This would skew the observations enough not to ‘wash out’ the observed trends.
in Fig. 5, moving the location of the strongest He ii EW (at low
We used the FWHM of the Mg ii line to estimate 𝑀BH . Shen
𝑀BH ) to larger 𝐿/𝐿 Edd , more in line with the 𝐿/𝐿 Edd threshold at
et al. (2008) showed that such Mg ii-derived 𝑀BH estimates corre-
high 𝑀BH above which we see the weakest He ii and largest C iv
late tightly with those derived from H𝛽 across the full 108−10 𝑀
blueshifts.
H𝛽 Mg ii
mass range, with the distribution of log 𝑀BH 𝑀BH following
a Gaussian with mean 0.034 and dispersion 0.22 dex. Shen & Liu
(2012) extended this analysis to higher redshifts and higher lumi-
5.1.2 Black hole mass estimates nosities, more appropriate for the objects in this work, and again
found that the Mg ii properties remained well correlated with those
As well as the assumption of a constant bolometric correction, we
of H𝛽. The Mg ii-derived 𝑀BH estimates we use in this work are
have used a single-epoch virial estimator to estimate SMBH masses
therefore unlikely to be biased compared to those which we would
throughout this work. The caveats associated with such estimates
have derived from a single-epoch H𝛽 measurement. The possibility
are numerous and have been reviewed by Shen (2013). Here we
remains, however, that such estimates are biased as a function of the
discuss some of the issues which are most relevant to our method
SED, or equivalently, as a function of 𝑀BH and 𝐿/𝐿 Edd .
and results. Most notably, the BLR radius–luminosity relation (as
encoded through the virial 𝑓 factor) may depend on the shape of the Early concerns about the universality of the BLR radius–
SED. Other uncertainties arising from (for example) orientation are luminosity relation were discussed by Kaspi et al. (2005) and Collin
likely to be random, in the sense that they will add scatter to our et al. (2006). More recently, various authors have tried to account
𝑀BH estimates but should not bias our results. While it is possible for possible SED-dependent biases in single-epoch 𝑀BH estimates
that our observed distribution of quasars in the 𝑀BH –𝐿/𝐿 Edd plane (Du & Wang 2019; Dalla Bontà et al. 2020; Fonseca Alvarez et al.
is not the same as the intrinsic distribution, the fact that we do still 2020; Martínez-Aldama et al. 2020), either using the accretion rate
observe such striking behaviour in the He ii and C iv emission line directly or by using the strength of optical iron emission 𝑅Fe ii as a
properties as a function of our inferred 𝑀BH and 𝐿/𝐿 Edd is telling proxy. However, Khadka et al. (2022a,b) and Yu et al. (2022a) find
1010 𝐿/𝐿 Edd & 0.2) the strength of He ii emission is set directly by the
ionizing photon luminosity at 54 eV, and thus that He ii is providing
12 a probe of the EUV which is not directly observable. Moreover, the
observed He ii EW behaviour provides further evidence for the soft
excess to be an intermediate, warm Comptonising component which
10
behaves in the way in which the qsosed models predict. The strongest
and weakest 228 Å emission (relative to the 1640 Å continuum) are
MBH [M ]
both produced at high Eddington ratios, at low (≈ 108 𝑀 ) and high
fbol
8
109
(≈ 1010 𝑀 ) SMBH mass respectively.
However, the match between the observed He ii and the predicted
6 strength of the 54 eV ionizing luminosity is not perfect, especially
fbol = 5.15 in the 𝐿/𝐿 Edd . 0.2 regime. This mismatch might suggest a decou-
pling between the He ii EW and the 228 Å continuum flux at these
4 Eddington ratios, perhaps if changes in the BLR covering factor lead
to differences in the fraction of the continuum source which is re-
108 processed into emission lines. Another possibility is that the He ii
1044 1045 1046 1047
−1 continuum becomes optically thin, for instance if the density of the
νLν | [erg s ]
3000Å BLR were to decrease (which could indicate the absence of a dense
outflow). Alternatively, the mismatch could suggest that the SED
Figure 6. The predicted bolometric correction, 𝑓bol ≡ 𝐿bol /𝐿3000 , as a func- models are inaccurate in this Eddington ratio regime. Intriguingly,
tion of 𝐿3000 , from qsosed models. The points are colour-coded by 𝑀BH with this regime is similar to the region of the 𝑀BH –𝐿 2500 Å space where
a logarithmic normalisation, and points of constant mass are joined with solid Mitchell et al. (2022) find a mismatch between the observed and pre-
lines so that the trends with Eddington ratio can be understood by following dicted 𝛼ox . Either way, the observed switch in He ii behaviour above
individual lines from left to right. The adopted bolometric correction in this and below 𝐿/𝐿 Edd ≈ 0.2 (which is not reflected in the qsosed mod-
work, 𝑓bol = 5.15, is shown as a horizontal dashed line. 𝑓bol ranges from els) suggests that something fundamental is changing in the structure
≈ 3 − 10, and our adopted 𝑓bol is bounded by this range; however 𝑓bol does
of either the BLR or the accretion flow.
have a clear dependence on mass and luminosity in the model SEDs. Our
assumption of a fixed 𝑓bol could lead to an artificially reduced dynamic range
C iv is a resonant doublet with a more complicated ionic structure
in the inferred 𝐿bol at 𝑀BH = 108 𝑀 and an artificially increased range of than He ii. However, the close correspondence of the C iv blueshift
𝐿bol at 𝑀BH = 1010 𝑀 . and EW with the He ii EW, allied with the fact that the He ii behaviour
can be consistently explained with trends in the SED, suggests that the
C iv morphology is governed by accretion physics - specifically the
the opposite result, with the inclusion of 𝑅Fe ii having no effect on shape of the SED in the near and extreme ultraviolet regions. Given
the scatter in either the Mg ii or H𝛽 radius–luminosity relations. the proximity of the C iv and He ii ionization edges, at 64 eV and
While the literature remains divided, we argue it is still true that 54 eV respectively, this result is perhaps unsurprising. More notable
any SED-dependent bias in our single-epoch 𝑀BH estimates must be is the fact that the observed 𝛼ox behaviour does not correspond so
contained within the scatter on the BLR radius–luminosity relation, well to the C iv morphology, as demonstrated by the differing trends
i.e. within 0.3-0.5 dex. This scatter is smaller than the range spanned in Figs. 3 and 4. This shows how the 2 keV X-ray emission is a weaker
by our sample by a factor of ≈3, meaning that SED-dependent bi- proxy than He ii for the physical mechanisms which control the C iv
ases in our 𝑀BH cannot explain the observed trends presented in emission.
Section 4.1. Finally, the fact that our 𝐿/𝐿 Edd & 0.2 observations of He ii and
𝛼ox can be well explained by changes in the predicted model SEDs is
significant. The qsosed models were calibrated using observations
5.2 Quasar physics of just three objects with 𝑀BH = 108 𝑀 (Kubota & Done 2018), and
had not been critically assessed at higher SMBH masses prior to the
5.2.1 AGN accretion models recent work of Mitchell et al. (2022). The fact that the models agree
In Section 4.2, we compared our observations with predictions from with our observations across a relatively wide range of parameter
the qsosed models of Kubota & Done (2018). The predictions for 𝛼ox space was not necessarily to be expected. Moreover, the theoretical
made by these models have recently been tested over a much broader models show that the different phenomenological behaviours ob-
parameter space (𝑀BH ≈ 107−10 𝑀 and 𝐿 3000 ≈ 1043.5−47 erg s−1 ) served in 𝛼ox and He ii (Figs. 4 and 5) have natural origins in the
by Mitchell et al. (2022), who find that the qsosed model predicts SED, and that the observations presented in this work are broadly in
the optical and X-ray SED fairly well for 𝑀BH . 109 𝑀 , but that agreement with our current understanding of the accretion physics in
at higher masses the outer accretion disc spectra are predicted to be AGN.
too cool to match the observed data, especially at lower Eddington
ratios. This finding is consistent with our result (in Fig. 4) that the
5.2.2 AGN outflow models
2 keV emission is predicted to be slightly stronger (relative to the
2500 Å emission) than observed at 𝑀BH ≈ 109.5 𝑀 . In this subsection we test the predictions made by Giustini & Proga
In this work we have also quantified the He ii emission, which (2019), who summarize current understanding of AGN accretion and
provides a new, complementary probe of the ionizing SED across outflow mechanisms with a particular focus on the physical condi-
the 𝑀BH –𝐿/𝐿 Edd space. In Section 4.2 we found that, for 𝐿/𝐿 Edd & tions required to drive powerful winds from the accretion disc through
0.2, the observed He ii EW is qualitatively similar to the behaviour radiation line driving. We note again that the picture described by
of the 54 eV ionizing SED predicted by the qsosed models. The Giustini & Proga (2019) might not be the only plausible model for
observations are consistent with a scenario in which (at least for AGN outflows, but we choose to compare with their picture as it pro-
109
Timlin John D. I., Brandt W. N., Laor A., 2021, MNRAS, 504, 5556
Titarchuk L., 1994, ApJ, 434, 570
4πν Jν
Vanden Berk D. E., Wesolowski S. C., Yeckley M. J., Marcinik J. M., Quash-
nock J. M., Machia L. M., Wu J., 2020, MNRAS, 493, 2745
Vasudevan R. V., Fabian A. C., 2007, MNRAS, 381, 1235
Vasudevan R. V., Fabian A. C., 2009, MNRAS, 392, 1124 108
φν
York D. G., et al., 2000, AJ, 120, 1579
Yu Z., et al., 2022a, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2208.05491
Yu W., Richards G. T., Vogeley M. S., Moreno J., Graham M. J., 2022b, ApJ,
936, 132 1000
Zakamska N. L., Greene J. E., 2014, MNRAS, 442, 784
φν [cm-2 Hz-1 s-1]
10−3
APPENDIX A: THE ROLE OF X-RAYS IN φν Softest SED (αox=-2.05)
PHOTOIONIZATION φν Hardest SED (αox=-0.05)
This appendix shows that the X-ray portion of the SED is an insignif- He, C L
H 2 keV
icant source of ionization for typical AGN emission line regions. 10−6
C K
This is surprising since the SEDs shown in Fig. 2 have a signifi-
1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019
cant fraction of their power at high energies. The ultraviolet–X-ray
hardness ratio (𝛼ox ) does correlate with emission line properties, as Hz
summarized above, but this is not likely a direct relation with the
observed X-rays.
To illustrate this point, we use the hardest and softest SEDs from Figure A1. The upper panel shows the hardest and softest SEDs presented in
this paper. The lower panel shows the flux of photons 𝜙𝜈 for the same models.
our model grid (Section 3), corresponding to 𝑚¤ = 0.027 and 𝑚¤ =
Some important energies are indicated by the hashed lines near the bottom
1.000 at 𝑀BH = 1010 𝑀 . These SEDs are shown in the top panel of
of each panel. These show the ionization potentials of ground-state H0 and
Figure A1, and have 𝛼ox = −0.05 in the hardest and 𝛼ox = −2.05 in He2+ , the L and K shells of C2+ , and 2 keV. The flux of ionizing photons is
the softest cases. orders of magnitude smaller at 2 keV compared to the flux at the He ii and
The photoionization rate for a given shell 𝑛 is C iv photoionization edges even for the hardest SED.
∫ ∞
Γ𝑛 = 𝜎𝜈 𝜙 𝜈 𝑑𝜈[s−1 ] (A1)
𝜈0 ∼6 dex fainter than the value near the peak. Photoionization is photon-
where 𝜈0 , 𝜎𝜈 , and 𝜙 𝜈 are the photoionization threshold of shell 𝑛, its counting and there are relatively few high-energy photons despite
energy-dependent photoionization cross section [cm2 ] , and the flux their significant energy.
of ionizing photons [cm−2 s−1 Hz−1 ] (Osterbrock & Ferland 2006). The photon flux is multiplied by the photoionization cross section
The total photoionization rate is the sum over all shells, to derive the photoionization rate (Eq. A1). We concentrate on C2+
∑︁ since photoionization of that ion produces C3+ and C iv 𝜆1549 emis-
Γtotal = Γ𝑛 [s−1 ] (A2) sion. The shell-dependent cross sections for photoionization of C2+ ,
𝑛 taken from Verner et al. (1996), are shown in Fig. A2. Both the 1s2 K
The flux of ionizing photons 𝜙 𝜈 enters in the photoionization shell in the X-ray and the lower energy 2s2 L shell are shown. Both
rate (Eq. A1). This is the ratio 𝜙 𝜈 = 4𝜋𝜈𝐽𝜈 /(ℎ𝜈 2 ) and is shown in shells have two electrons and, as expected, the peak photoionization
the lower panel of Fig. A1. The photon flux near 2 keV is typically cross sections are similar.
φν σν [s-1]
10−19
1
10−20
φν σν Softest SED (αox=-2.05)
φν σν Hardest SED (αox=-0.05)
10−3
He, C L
H 2 keV
−21
10 C K
1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019
Hz Hz
Figure A3. This shows the rate that photons interact with matter, the product
Figure A2. The K and L shell photoionization cross sections for C2+ are
of the flux of photons and the total gas opacity. X-rays interact with matter
shown as a function of energy. The cross section are from the calculations by
with a rate about ∼ 7 dex slower than the rate near the peak rate around
Verner et al. (1996). These, together with the flux of photons (lower panel of
50 − 912Å.
Figure A1), determine the photoionization rate (Equation A1) and the effects
of light upon matter.
since emission from the gas which absorbed the softer radiation
would be far stronger. This is discussed in Section 4.1 of Ferland
Table A1. Photoionization rates for H0 and the K and L shells of C2+ . et al. (2013). The ultraviolet luminosity of a realistic SED has more
power than the relatively hard X-ray portion that drives an XDR.
The full SED striking a cloud produces successive H+ /H0 /H2 layers,
Shell ΓSoftest [s−1 ] ΓHardest [s−1 ] which are brighter than the deep X-ray heated regions. Emission
from regions powered by lower-energy light would dominate over
H0 K 8.24e+00 5.52e+00 the XDR.
C2+ L 2.66e-01 4.66e-01
C2+ K 4.49e-03 2.71e-02
Correlations between the X-ray portion of the SED and emission-
line properties are observed. These are likely due to other correlations
with the softer portions of the SED, as evident in Figure 2, and not
the X-rays themselves.
The photoionization rates for H0 and the two shells of C2+ are
listed in Table A1. The C2+ K-shell rate is 17 to 60 times smaller
then the L-shell rate. Both are ∼ 10 − 30 times smaller than the H0
photoionization rate. From this comparison we expect that the effects APPENDIX B: ADDITIONAL OBSERVATIONS
of the EUV and XUV will be more important than the X-ray, mainly
In this Appendix we present additional observational results. First,
due to the larger number of softer photons.
in Fig. B1 we present the He ii EW, the C iv blueshift and 𝛼ox as a
Figure A3 shows the rate at which photons interact with matter for
function of the FWHM of Mg ii 𝜆2800 and the 3000 Å continuum
our two reference SEDs and a solar composition. Calculations are
luminosity. These two parameters are measured directly from the
done with Cloudy version 22.01, as last described by Ferland et al.
SDSS spectroscopy and photometry respectively. By contrast, the
(2017). Cloud parameters are typical of the C iv emitting region of
plots in the main text show observed properties as a function of
an AGN. The vertical axis is the total light-matter interaction rate at
0.5
a particular frequency and is the product of the photon flux and the 𝑀BH ∝ 𝐿 3000 FWHM2Mg ii (B1)
total gas opacity, evaluated for the appropriate chemical composition
and degree of ionization. The 50-912 Å ultraviolet region is ∼7 dex and
more interactive than 2 keV X-rays. 0.5
𝐿/𝐿 Edd ∝ 𝐿 3000 /𝑀BH ∝ 𝐿 3000 FWHM−2
Mg ii . (B2)
The result that the X-rays hardly matter at all is surprising given the
shape of the SEDs in the upper panel of Figure A1. This is because Given that both 𝑀BH and 𝐿/𝐿 Edd depend on the observed parameters
photoionization is photon counting, and the paucity of X-ray photons FWHMMg ii and 𝐿 3000 , this might lead to induced correlations in the
cannot make up for their great energy. High-energy photons would 𝑀BH –𝐿/𝐿 Edd space. However, in practice our inferred 𝑀BH –𝐿/𝐿 Edd
dominate the physics if softer parts of the SED were extinguished space is simply a rotation and reflection of the FWHMMg ii –𝐿 3000
so only X-rays strike the gas. Indeed, this is the ‘XDR’ model of space, where we (reassuringly) still see clear trends. Furthermore, we
atomic and molecular regions of clouds exposed to ionizing radiation see the same He ii behaviour as a function of FWHMMg ii and 𝐿 3000
(Wolfire et al. 2022). It would be difficult to detect this XDR emission in the X-ray detected sub-sample as in our full sample, meaning that
4 4
[erg s−1 ]
1046 2 1046 2
3000Å
3000Å
νLν |
νLν |
1 1
1045 1045
0.5 0.5
−1.2
0
125 150 175 200
47 47
10 10
0
[erg s−1 ]
[erg s−1 ]
−1.4
αox
0
100
3000Å
3000Å
−1.6
750
νLν |
νLν | −1.7
500
1045 1045
250
−1.8
0
−1.9
2500 5000 7500 10000 2500 5000 7500 10000
−1 −1
FWHM(MgII) [km s ] FWHM(MgII) [km s ]
Figure B1. Observed quasar properties as a function of the FWHM of Mg ii 𝜆2800 and the 3000 Å continuum luminosity. Left panel: The median He ii EW
(top) and C iv blueshift (bottom) in our full sample of 191 391 objects. Right panel: The median He ii EW (top) and 𝛼ox (bottom) in our sub-sample of 5325
X-ray detected sources. The He ii behaviour is identical in both panels (modulo the sample size), suggesting that our X-ray detected sub-sample is not biased
in terms of its ultraviolet emission properties. Moreover, clear differences are seen in the behaviour of He ii and 𝛼ox within the X-ray subsample: the strongest
He ii emission is seen only at low Mg ii FWHM while the strongest 2 keV X-ray emission is seen only at the lowest 3000 Å luminosities.
our X-ray detected objects are not obviously biased compared to our paring our qsosed models with data we tried to match scalings and
full sample. biases in the data introduced by the fixed bolometric correction by
Second, we show the 2 keV X-ray continuum and He ii 𝜆1640 line applying appropriate transformations to the qsosed outputs. For the
luminosities in Fig. B2. Assuming no changes in the BLR covering SMBH mass, the estimate in the data from the Mg ii line width but
factor, and that the He ii continuum is optically thick, 𝐿 He ii can also requires an estimate of the line formation radius, for which we
be taken as a proxy for the continuum luminosity at 54 eV. These follow the usual method and assume that the BLR radius scales as
two observables show qualitatively different behaviour: contours of 𝑅BLR ∝ 𝐿 1/2 . The 𝐿 in this expression should really be some appro-
constant 𝐿 2 keV are largely aligned with lines of constant 𝑀BH , which priate ionizing luminosity, but 𝐿 bol is normally used and we follow
is consistent with the assumption in qsosed that the hard X-ray power this convention. As a result, the bolometric correction enters into the
law component emits a constant fraction of the Eddington luminosity. SMBH mass estimate and implies a bias in the SMBH mass estimates
He ii behaves in a much more complex manner, with the gradient with respect to the true SMBH mass by factor of ( 𝑓bol /5.15) −1/2 .
vector of increasing 𝐿 He ii changing depending on the location in the As a result, when plotting 𝑀BH along the 𝑥-axis of Figs. 5 and 4, we
𝑀BH –𝐿/𝐿 Edd space. apply the scaling
APPENDIX C: BOLOMETRIC CORRECTIONS where 𝑀BH, q denotes the input qsosed grid value (the ‘true’ SMBH
mass). For 𝐿/𝐿 Edd , correction factors appear in both the numer-
In the data, we apply a fixed bolometric correction of 5.15 to estimate ator and denominator. 𝐿 Edd ∝ 𝑀BH , introducing a bias factor
𝐿 bol from 𝜈𝐿 𝜈 at 𝜈 = 3000Å. In reality, the bolometric correction ( 𝑓bol /5.15) −1/2 into the Eddington ratio estimate, while the numera-
will vary as a function of 𝑀BH and 𝐿/𝐿 Edd . We discussed the vari- tor is 𝐿 bol and so contains a straightforward bias factor of 𝑓bol /5.15.
ation of the bolometric correction from the qsosed model grid in As a result, the relationship between the 𝐿/𝐿 Edd plotted in Figs. 5
Section 5.1.1, showing a range in 𝑓bol by a factor of ≈ 2 − 3, where and 4, and the dimensionless, Eddington-scaled accretion rate used
𝑓bol ≡ 𝜈𝐿 𝜈 | 3000Å /𝐿 bol is calculated from each individual qsosed as input to qsosed is given by
model. Although a true ‘Apples versus Apples’ comparison is only
really possible with full knowledge of the intrinsic SED, in com- 𝐿/𝐿 Edd = 𝑚¤ × ( 𝑓bol /5.15) × ( 𝑓bol /5.15) −1/2 . (C2)
1047 1047
1045
[erg s−1 ]
[erg s−1 ]
1046 1046
3000Å
3000Å
νLν |
νLν |
1045 1045
L/LEdd
10−1 10−1
1044
10−2 10−2
1042
108 109 1010 108 109 1010
MBH [M ] MBH [M ]
Figure B2. He ii line luminosity (left) and 2 keV X-ray continuum luminosity (right) as a function of SMBH mass, luminosity and Eddington ratio. Contours of
constant 𝐿2 keV are largely aligned with lines of constant 𝑀BH , consistent with the assumption in qsosed that the hard X-ray emission is equal to 2 per cent of
the Eddington limit.
L/LEdd
L228 /L1640
10−1 10−1 10−1 0.06
3000Å,q
(ν Lν |
0.04
Figure C1. An illustration of how the qsosed predictions change with differing treatments of the bolometric correction, focusing on the bottom-right panel of
Fig. 4. Left panel: the model outputs plotted as a function of the intrinsic, input values of 𝑚¤ and 𝑀BH, q . Centre panel: as in the left panel, but with the 𝑦-axis
is replaced with 𝐿bol /𝐿Edd where 𝐿bol is calculated from 𝐿3000 using a constant bolometric correction of 5.15. Right panel: as in the centre panel, but with the
𝑥-axis scaled by ( 𝑓bol /5.15) −1/2 and the 𝑦-axis scaled by ( 𝑓bol /5.15) 1/2 to capture the impact of the bolometric correction on SMBH mass estimates in the
observed data. See the main Appendix text for details.
The effect of introducing these scaling factors as transformations APPENDIX D: BLACK HOLE SPIN
from the initial qsosed grid is shown in Fig. C1, to show how the
right-hand panels of Figs. 4 and 5 would change if we had made a In Fig. D1 we show how the predictions of 𝛼ox and our He ii 𝜆1640
different presentation choice. The scale factors twist and distort the EW proxy (𝐿 228 /𝐿 1640 ) from qsosed change if we instead con-
simulation grid slightly from the original uniform parameter space, sider a maximally spinning SMBH. While the qualitative trends
but, overall, the effects are fairly modest because only square-root in the 𝐿 228 /𝐿 1640 are broadly in line with the low spin case, the
terms distinguish the rightmost panel from the original input grid. 𝑎 ∗ = 1 models fail to reproduce the observed low values of 𝛼ox at
high Eddington fractions and SMBH masses (see discussion in Sec-
1046
[erg s−1 ]
[erg s−1 ]
−1.3
νLν (erg s−1 )
1046 1046
ṁ
1045
3000Å
3000Å
−1.4
10−1
ν Lν |
ν Lν |
1044 1045 1045
−1.5
L228 /L1640
αox
1047 1010
100 100
ṁ = 0.15 −1.6
1046
νLν (erg s−1 )
MBH [M ]
L/LEdd
L/LEdd
−1.7
0.1
1045 109 10−1 10−1
−1.8
1044
He II
0.06
αox
10−2 10−2
108 108 109 1010 −1.9 108 109 1010
1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019
ν (Hz) MBH [M ] MBH [M ]
Figure D1. Left panel: As Fig. 2, but for the maximally spinning case, 𝑎∗ = 0.998. The grey shaded area shows the range of the SEDs shown in Fig. 2 for the
non-spinning case. Centre and right panels: qsosed predictions for 𝛼ox and 𝐿228 /𝐿1640 for a maximally spinning SMBH with 𝑎∗ = 0.998 (cf. Figs. 4 and 5).
tion 5.2.3). The reason for this can be understood from the left-hand
panel of Fig. D1, where we show the qsosed broadband spectrum
(the analogue to Fig. 2) for the maximally spinning case. Inspection
of the high 𝑚¤ models in the top-panel reveals that the 𝛼ox behaviour
is driven by a combination of stronger X-rays and the movement of
the peak of the thermal component. At high spin, the thermal peak
moves blueward to higher energies, such that the lower frequency
pivot point falls further from the peak and has lower flux compared
to the low spin model. In qsosed, this behaviour comes about in
a slightly convoluted way, but is driven by the decrease of the ra-
dius 𝑅warm (and corresponding temperature increase). This decrease
happens because 𝑅warm = 2𝑅hot , and 𝑅hot must move inwards as
spin increases, because 𝑅ISCO moves closer to the SMBH so 𝑅hot
must also decrease from eq. 2 of Kubota & Done (2018) to maintain
the model assumption that the dissipated power is 2 per cent of the
Eddington luminosity. One could clearly construct other models in
which the critical radii change in different ways when the spin is
changed, which is partly why we caution against over-interpreting
the fact that maximally spins appear difficult to reconcile with the
data.
This paper has been typeset from a TEX/LATEX file prepared by the author.