Session 12 PR 5 Resettlement
Session 12 PR 5 Resettlement
Session 12 PR 5 Resettlement
v Involuntary resettlement
v Economic & Physical
v Legal title, customary,
traditional and informal
occupation & use.
RESETTLEMENTS CHALLENGES
Cernea 1998.
AVOIDING AND MINIMIZING RESETTLEMENT
• Avoid resettlement, & when not possible, minimise through alternative project design.
• Mitigate adverse social and economic impacts
• Restore or improve livelihoods & standard of living
AVOIDING RESETTLEMENT – FULL ASSESSMENT OF
ALTERNATIVES
Road
Technical
Environment
Social
Economic
Route
Site
1
Meets
technical
Biodiversity
200
Roma
Road
cost
specifica0ons issue
–
squa@ers
+
€2.7
Bn
endangered
20
houses.
RAP
€300M
wild
goat
5000
small-‐
present holder
parcels
Site
2
Meets
technical
Biodiversity
50
houses
to
Road
cost
specifica0ons issue
–
be
moved.
€2.8
Bn
endangered
2000
parcels
RAP
€300M
moth
present in
large
farms.
Site
3
Significant
More
altered
150 houses all Road
cost
€3
technical
habitat.
No
formal owners Bn
challenges,
hence
endangered.
to be moved. RAP
€400M
extra
cost.
Also
Land
slide
risk 2500 parcels
addi0onal
risk.
in large farms
RESETTLEMENT PRINCIPLES AND COMPENSATION
• Restore or where
possible improve
livelihoods & standard of
living
• Assessing resettlement
impacts fully – temporary
assistance & relocation
allowances
CONSULTATION, PARTICIPATION AND GRIEVANCES
Documen0ng
Consulta0on
Easy access to responsive grievance process
&
Disclosure
is
key
and
oVen
Household negotiations
missed
Early
Participation in decisions that affect households
implemented
grievance
processes
Ongoing consultation process
avoid
many
later
issues
ECONOMIC AND PHYSICAL RESETTLEMENT
Processes
ü Consultation & participation in
decisions
ü Accessible grievance process
ü Detailed census of livelihood &
household assets
ü Determine entitlements
ü Resettlement to better housing /
pay replacement cost
ü Temporary assistance, moving
support & transitional support
ü Assistance to restore livelihood
OUTCOMES FOR PHYSICAL AND ECONOMIC
RESETTLEMENT
• Gap analysis
Rese@le-‐ • Supplementary resettlement and
ment
livelihood restoration plans
• Engagement with government on
resettlement.
GOVERNMENT MANAGED, URBAN RESETTLEMENT
CASE STUDY
Informal Roma communities are frequently
affected by urban regeneration projects of
various types.
A private urban regeneration project will
resettle 123 Roma households and 4
formally owned non-Roma properties. The
government will acquire all land.
• What sort of resettlement entitlements exist?
• What livelihood restoration strategies might
be used?
• What would you advise the company in this
case?What do you think would be key
obstacles to PR 5 conformance in this case?
RESETTLEMENT PLANNING
Conceptual
Framework RAP
RAP
(Builds on conceptual RAP) Based
on baselines, impact assessment &
initial consultations
TAKE AWAY MESSAGES