Cambridge International AS & A Level: Geography 9696/22 May/June 2022
Cambridge International AS & A Level: Geography 9696/22 May/June 2022
Cambridge International AS & A Level: Geography 9696/22 May/June 2022
GEOGRAPHY 9696/22
Paper 2 Core Human Geography May/June 2022
MARK SCHEME
Maximum Mark: 60
Published
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the
examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the
details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have
considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for
Teachers.
Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes for the May/June 2022 series for most
Cambridge IGCSE, Cambridge International A and AS Level and Cambridge Pre-U components, and some
Cambridge O Level components.
These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers.
They should be applied alongside the specific content of the mark scheme or generic level descriptors
for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these marking principles.
the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question
the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question
the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts.
Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions).
marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However, credit
is given for valid answers which go beyond the scope of the syllabus and mark scheme,
referring to your Team Leader as appropriate
marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do
marks are not deducted for errors
marks are not deducted for omissions
answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar when these
features are specifically assessed by the question as indicated by the mark scheme. The
meaning, however, should be unambiguous.
Rules must be applied consistently, e.g. in situations where candidates have not followed
instructions or in the application of generic level descriptors.
Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the question
(however; the use of the full mark range may be limited according to the quality of the candidate
responses seen).
Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should
not be awarded with grade thresholds or grade descriptors in mind.
Section A
Answer all questions in this section. All questions are worth 10 marks.
Population
1(a) Fig. 1.1 shows average calorie consumption per person per day, for 1
USA and China, 1968–2018.
Using Fig. 1.1, state the number of years China had an average calorie
consumption per person per day below 2000 kcal.
9 or 10
1(b) Compare the changes in average calorie consumption per person per 4
day for USA and China shown in Fig. 1.1.
Indicative:
Both have increased since 1968 – although the starting points are very
different
China has increased at a faster rate than USA – China is catching USA
up
USA has never been below 3000 kcal – China only got above that in
2009
Overall increase for China (1750 to 3200 est.) is more significant than
USA (3000 to 3750 est.)
USA seems to be levelling-off, but China is continuing to increase
1(c) Suggest why an increase in calorie consumption per person per day 5
may create problems for a country.
Indicative:
Obesity with resulting health issues e.g. diabetes
Health issues creating a strain on health services
Limited amount of food production so where will it come from + impact
on farming/environment
Increased costs of supplying the extra calories
Need to import more food – increased costs, potential debt problems
Could increase global warming e.g. increased consumption of beef
Population/Migration
2(a) Table 2.1 shows the reasons for internal migration for males and 3
females in India, an MIC in Asia, in 2011.
Compare the reasons for internal migration for males and females
shown in Table 2.1.
Indicative:
The reasons for migration vary significantly between males and females
Men are more likely to migrate for work, 23.9% vs 2.1% for women. The
majority of migration for women is due to marriage (66.5%), this is
relatively low % for men, around 3.7%.
Both sexes have a fairly low % migrating for education, but again slightly
higher in men.
Males undertake more migration to be with family at 34%, nearly twice
as much as females.
2(b) Suggest two reasons for the difference in percentage between males 3
and females moving for work in India as shown in Table 2.1.
Indicative:
Indicative:
Reduces the friction of distance
Reduces travel costs (in time/effort)
Supplies more information on destinations to better inform choices
Greater feedback from existing migrants; promotes chain migration
Enables migrants to keep in touch with friends and family
Settlement dynamics
State three different pieces of evidence from Fig. 3.1 which suggest
that this is a recently developed manufacturing site.
Indicative:
Still building – vacant areas to the top right
Buildings look new (clean and fresh)
Vegetation not regrown – bottom left
Not all car storage/parking spaces filled – suggests more to come
Nothing old appears in photograph
Modern layout and design
3(b) Suggest why the location of the manufacturing site shown in Fig. 3.1 is 3
suitable for modern-day manufacturing.
Indicative:
Large-scale site with room for expansion
Large area of flat land to accommodate the big modern buildings
Good road communications – highway top right
Appears to be distant from housing to minimise impact on residential
areas (less pollution/congestion)
Space for parking
Can build on greenfield site – no pre-existing buildings to remove or
incorporate
Land may be cheaper
Other
3(c) Explain why services might locate in the central business district 4
(CBD) of urban areas.
Indicative:
Good access for both workers and customers (transport hub)
Complementarity – services interlink
High demand
High cost of sites can be offset by building upwards
Access to a large number and range of customers
(workers/residents/tourists)
Could be near universities etc. to supply skilled workers and/or use
services
Anti-pollution laws which improve CBD environment
Demand from government for services
Government incentives/zoning/grants
Section B
Answer one question from this section. All questions are worth 30 marks.
Population
4(a) Describe the changes in the birth rate in the demographic transition 7
model (DTM).
Indicative:
Stage 1 (High stationary) – BR is high and fluctuates
Stage 2 (Early expanding) – BR remains high
Stage 3 (Late expanding) – BR falling but slowing
Stage 4 (Low stationary) – BR is low
Stage 5 (Declining) – BR falls further or remains low
Candidates may not answer with reference to stages, but this may be self-
limiting.
4(b) With the aid of examples, explain why infant mortality rates fall with 8
the increased economic development of an area.
Candidates may answer this stage by stage of the DTM or consider the
various factors that come with increased economic development:
Improvement in diets (quality and quantity) – farming improves
Improved health – medical advances, more hospitals, better health care
Greater security so fewer wars, violence
Improved water supply (quality and quantity)
Greater education on safer living for mothers – anti-smoking, better
hygiene etc.
Improved housing – so fewer fires, fewer bugs etc.
Cultural shift such that female children more valued and protected
More years in education means women may have fewer children – fewer
children mean a lower IMR
Improved transport so aid can reach problem areas
Level 3 (6–8)
Response clearly explains in detail why infant mortality rates fall with the
increased economic development of an area. Response is well founded in
detailed knowledge and strong conceptual understanding of the topic.
Examples used are appropriate and integrated effectively into the response.
Level 2 (3–5)
Response offers some explanation of why infant mortality rates fall with the
increased economic development of an area. Response develops on a
largely secure base of knowledge and understanding. Examples may lack
detail or development.
Level 1 (1–2)
Response is largely descriptive with limited, if any, explanation of why infant
mortality rates fall with the increased economic development of an area.
Knowledge is basic and understanding may be inaccurate. Examples are in
name only or lacking entirely.
Level 0 (0)
No creditable response.
Candidates are free to develop their own approach to the question and
responses will vary depending on the approach chosen. Whichever
approach is chosen, essays which address the question and support their
argument with relevant examples will be credited. There may be detailed
consideration of a case study/one or more examples, or a broadly conceived
response, drawing on several examples to illustrate the factors involved.
So is economic the main impact? Are all impacts negative – are there some
positives? e.g. increased employment in education.
Award marks based on the quality of the response using the marking levels
below.
Level 4 (12–15)
Response thoroughly discusses the extent to which the main impact of a
youthful population on a country is an economic one. Examples used are
appropriate and integrated effectively into the response. Response is well
founded in detailed knowledge and strong conceptual understanding of the
topic.
Level 3 (8–11)
Response discusses the extent to which the main impact of a youthful
population on a country is an economic one but may be unbalanced.
Examples may lack detail or development. Response develops on a largely
secure base of knowledge and understanding.
Level 2 (4–7)
Response shows general knowledge and understanding of the extent to
which the main impact of a youthful population on a country is an economic
one. Response is mainly descriptive or explanatory with limited use of
examples and understanding of the topic may be partial or inaccurate. Some
concluding remarks. General responses without the use of example(s) will
not get above the middle of Level 2 (6 marks).
Level 1 (1–3)
Response may broadly discuss the role of a youthful population but does
not address the question and does not come to a convincing conclusion.
Response is descriptive, knowledge is basic and understanding is poor.
Level 0 (0)
No creditable response.
Population/Migration
Indicative:
On cause/reason/motivation: employment, education, forced vs
voluntary, pushed vs pulled
On distance: international vs internal (or regional, local etc.)
On direction: rural to urban, intra-urban etc.
On duration: migration vs circulation
On nature of people moving e.g. refugees, legal/illegal
On demographic characteristics e.g. age, sex
On social factors e.g. level of education, family status
5(b) With the aid of examples, explain why the level of internal migration 8
has increased in many HICs.
Level 3 (6–8)
Response clearly explains in detail why the level of internal migration has
increased in many HICs. Response is well founded in detailed knowledge
and strong conceptual understanding of the topic. Examples used are
appropriate and integrated effectively into the response.
Level 2 (3–5)
Response offers some explanation of why the level of internal migration has
increased in many HICs. Response develops on a largely secure base of
knowledge and understanding. Examples may lack detail or development.
Level 1 (1–2)
Response is largely descriptive with limited, if any, explanation of why the
level of internal migration has increased in many HICs. Knowledge is basic
and understanding may be inaccurate. Examples are in name only or
lacking entirely.
Level 0 (0)
No creditable response.
With the aid of examples, to what extent do you agree with this view?
Candidates are free to develop their own approach to the question and
responses will vary depending on the approach chosen. Whichever
approach is chosen, essays which address the question and support their
argument with relevant examples will be credited. There may be detailed
consideration of a case study/one or more examples, or a broadly conceived
response, drawing on several examples to illustrate the factors involved.
Examples can be national or international.
Indicative:
In-migration can be negative for the receiving/destination area
depending on the volume and characteristics (e.g. young or old) of the
migrants
Economic – strain on services, jobs, housing, food supply etc.
Demographic – higher BR, sex imbalance
Social – unrest, friction with locals
Cultural – differences in religion, diet etc.
Political – may change local voting patterns
In-migration often involves the young, better educated, healthy or
wealthy population so can have a positive economic, social and cultural
impact
Award marks based on the quality of the response using the marking levels
below.
Level 4 (12–15)
Response thoroughly discusses the extent to which the impact of the
migration of a population into an area is always negative for the
receiving/destination area. Examples used are appropriate and integrated
effectively into the response. Response is well founded in detailed
knowledge and strong conceptual understanding of the topic.
Level 3 (8–11)
Response discusses the extent to which the impact of the migration of a
population into an area is always negative for the receiving/destination area
but may be unbalanced. Examples may lack detail or development.
Response develops on a largely secure base of knowledge and
understanding.
Level 2 (4–7)
Response shows general knowledge and understanding of the extent to
which the impact of the migration of a population into an area is always
negative for the receiving/destination area. Response is mainly descriptive
or explanatory with limited use of examples and understanding of the topic
may be partial or inaccurate. Some concluding remarks. General responses
without the use of example(s) will not get above the middle of Level 2 (6
marks).
Level 0 (0)
No creditable response.
Population/Migration/Settlement dynamics
This is about the causes that lead to re-urbanisation (a movement back into
urban areas) rather than an explanation of the process as such although
these may overlap.
Indicative:
Older population moving into urban areas for services/facilities –
especially accessible ones
Wealthy moving into older areas – gentrification
Students moving in to be near universities
Young population looking for bright lights/entertainment
Government policy e.g. investment in housing and services
Redevelopment leading to re-imaging of an area
Disadvantages of rural areas
Point mark. 1 mark per correct statement + 2 marks available for use of
examples.
Consequences occur both for the urban area and the rural area and can be
positive or negative although this may vary between groups/locations.
Indicative:
Environmental e.g. levels of pollution, congestion levels etc.
Demographic e.g. age/sex ratios, birth rates etc.
Economic e.g. employment, house prices, transport facilities
Social e.g. demand for services, crime levels etc.
Political e.g. voting patterns, type and direction of government
investments
Level 3 (6–8)
Response clearly explains in detail the consequences of re-urbanisation.
Response is well founded in detailed knowledge and strong conceptual
understanding of the topic. Examples used are appropriate and integrated
effectively into the response.
Level 2 (3–5)
Response offers some explanation of the consequences of re-urbanisation.
Response develops on a largely secure base of knowledge and
understanding. Examples may lack detail or development.
Level 1 (1–2)
Response is largely descriptive with limited, if any, explanation of the
consequences of re-urbanisation. Knowledge is basic and understanding
may be inaccurate. Examples are in name only or lacking entirely.
Level 0 (0)
No creditable response.
6(c) With the aid of examples, to what extent do political factors affect the 15
location of activities within urban areas?
Candidates are free to develop their own approach to the question and
responses will vary depending on the approach chosen. Whichever
approach is chosen, essays which address the question and support their
argument with relevant examples will be credited. There may be detailed
consideration of a case study/one or more examples, or a broadly conceived
response, drawing on several examples to illustrate the factors involved.
Political factors cover a wide range of influences and scales e.g. local vs
national. Factors could include:
Financial e.g. taxation/rates
Planning restrictions/land use zoning
Transport policy e.g. investment in roads/public transport
Investment in services e.g. education
Level of security/safety e.g. policing policy
Development schemes e.g. re-imaging/conservation projects
Impact of conflict
The key element is how these affect the location of activities such as
residential, retail, manufacturing etc. within urban areas.
Award marks based on the quality of the response using the marking levels
below.
Level 4 (12–15)
Response thoroughly discusses the extent to which political factors affect
the location of activities within urban areas. Examples used are appropriate
and integrated effectively into the response. Response is well founded in
detailed knowledge and strong conceptual understanding of the topic.
Level 3 (8–11)
Response discusses the extent to which political factors affect the location
of activities within urban areas but may be unbalanced. Examples may lack
detail or development. Response develops on a largely secure base of
knowledge and understanding.
Level 1 (1–3)
Response may broadly discuss the role of a limited number of political
factors but does not address the question and does not come to a
convincing conclusion. Response is descriptive, knowledge is basic and
understanding is poor.
Level 0 (0)
No creditable response.