Quiz in Reliability 1

Name:BELARMINO, LOUIE A.
Date:November 2, 2022
I. Direction: Read and analyze each item. Answer the following questions with your solution and put it in
yellow paper or bond paper.
1. 3 students take a test with a 50 questions and tested twice with the same test. Determine whether
the test is reliable using the test-retest methodology.
Student X Y X² Y² XY
1 43 44 1849 1936 1892
2 40 47 1600 2209 1880
3 45 43 2025 1849 1935
Total:3 ∑X= 128 ∑Y= 134 ∑X²= 5474 ∑Y²= 5994 ∑XY= 5707
Test-retest method using Pearson r
N(∑XY) - (∑X)(∑Y)
r=
√[n(∑X²) - (∑X)²] [ n∑Y² - (∑Y)²]
(3)(5707) - (128)(134)
r=
√[(3)(5474) - (128)²] [ (3)(5994) - (134)²]
17121 - 17152
r=
√[16422 - 16384] [ 17982 - 17956 ]
-31
r=
√[38] [26]
-31
r=
√988
-31
r=
31.43
r=0.99
2. Find out if the test is reliable using parallel form method administered to 6 students which are divided
into two equal groups. The first group will answer Form A and the second group will answer Form B.
Student Form A Form B
N X Y X² Y² XY
1 42 41 1764 1681 1722
2 48 49 2304 2401 2352
3 46 44 2116 1936 2024
Total: 6 ∑X= 136 ∑Y= 134 ∑X²= 6184 ∑Y²= 6018 ∑XY=6098
Parallel form method using Pearson r

N(∑XY) - (∑X)(∑Y)
r=
√[n(∑X²) - (∑X)²] [ n∑Y² - (∑Y)²]
(6)(6098) - (136)(134)
r=
√[(6)(6184) - (136)²] [ (6)(6018) - (134)²]
36588 - 18224
r=
√[37104 - 18496] [ 36108 - 17956 ]
18364
r=
√[18608] [18152]
18364
r=
√337772416
18364
r=
5811.82
r=3.16
3. 3 students take a test with 50 questions. For each student, the total score is recorded along with the
sum of the scores for the even questions and the sum of the scores for the odd question. Determine
whether the test is reliable by using the split-half and spearman-brown methodology.
Student Scores Even Odd X² Y² XY
X Y
1 44 22 22 484 484 484
2 48 25 23 625 529 575
3 43 24 19 576 361 456
Total: 3 ∑X= 71 ∑Y= 64 ∑X²=1685 ∑Y²=1374 ∑XY=1515
Split-half method Spearman-brown formula
2x reliability on half test 2 X 0.053

Whole test reliability = Whole test reliability = =0.1006647673
1+reliability on half test 1+ 0.053
N(∑XY) - (∑X)(∑Y)
r=
√[n(∑X²) - (∑X)²] [ n∑Y² - (∑Y)²]
(3)(1515) - (71)(64)
r=
√[(3)(1685) - (71)²] [ (3)(1374) - (64)²]
4545 - 4544
r=
√[5055 - 5041] [ 4122 - 4096 ]
1
r=
√[14] [26]
1
r=
√364
1
r=
19.08
r=0.053
4. 3 students perform in math and science subject and their scores are shown below. Using spearman
rho formula, determine whether math and science has a strong correlation.
Student science Math Rank 1 Rank 2 D D²
1 85 84 85 84 1 1
2 83 88 83 88 -5 25
3 89 86 89 86 3 9
Total: 4 ΣD²=35
Spearman Rho formula
6 ΣD²
rs= 1-
N³ - N
(6)(35)
rs= 1-
(4)³ - 4
210
rs= 1-
64 - 4
210
rs= 1-
60
Rs=2.5
5. Two judges will decide among the 30 dancers if they are qualified to join the dance group. Using
cohen’s kappa formula, determine the level of agreement between the two judges.
Rater 2
YES NO
YES 10 8 18
Rater 1 NO 7 5 12
Total: 17 13 30
Cohen’s Kappa formula
Pe= [( 18
30
x
17
30
)+( 12
30
x
13
30
)]
=0.34/0.173…
=1.97
Po=15/30= 50%
k = (Po – Pe) / (1 – Pe)
= 0.5 - 1.97 = 1.52

1- 1.97
II. Identify the following
1. It pertains to the extent to which the test covers the entire domain content.
CONTENT-RELATED EVIDENCE
2.It is a tool used in conjunction with lesson and unit planning to help teachers make genuine
connections between planning, instruction, and assessment.
TABLE OF SPECIFICATION (TOS)
3. Refers to the degree to which test scores agree with an external criterion, As such, it is related
to external validity.
CRITEREON-RELATED EVIDENCE
4. The extent that a test measures what it is supposed to measure.
VALIDITY
5. It is a method in construct validity occurs when measures of construct that are related are in
fact observed related.
CONVERGENT
6. It is a method in construct validity occurs when measures of construct that are unrelated are in
reality observed not to be.
DIVERGENT
7. is an assessment of the quality of the instrument used.
CONSTRUCT-RELATED EVIDENCE
8. A test that appears to adequately measure the learning outcomes and content is said to possess.
FACE VALIDITY
9. Pertains to the power or usefulness of test scores to predict future performance.
PREDICTIVE VALIDITY
10. Provides an estimate of a student's current performance in relation to a previously validated
or established measure.
CONCURRENT VALIDITY

Quiz in Reliability 1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Quiz in Reliability 1

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Quiz in Reliability 1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Name:BELARMINO, LOUIE A.

1 43 44 1849 1936 1892

2 40 47 1600 2209 1880

3 45 43 2025 1849 1935

Test-retest method using Pearson r

Student Form A Form B

1 42 41 1764 1681 1722

2 48 49 2304 2401 2352

3 46 44 2116 1936 2024

Parallel form method using Pearson r

Student Scores Even Odd X² Y² XY

1 44 22 22 484 484 484

2 48 25 23 625 529 575

3 43 24 19 576 361 456

Total: 3 ∑X= 71 ∑Y= 64 ∑X²=1685 ∑Y²=1374 ∑XY=1515

Split-half method Spearman-brown formula

2x reliability on half test 2 X 0.053

Student science Math Rank 1 Rank 2 D D²

Spearman Rho formula

Cohen’s Kappa formula

k = (Po – Pe) / (1 – Pe)

= 0.5 - 1.97 = 1.52

TABLE OF SPECIFICATION (TOS)

4. The extent that a test measures what it is supposed to measure.

7. is an assessment of the quality of the instrument used.

9. Pertains to the power or usefulness of test scores to predict future performance.

You might also like