Asset Management Plan Fleet

Norfolk County – Asset
Management Plan – Fleet
An overview of the County’s

Asset Management Practices
based on the Ontario Ministry of
Infrastructure’s Building Together
Initiative
Prepared for:
Norfolk County
183 Main St.
Delhi, Ontario N4B 2M3
Prepared by:
Stantec Consulting Ltd.
49 Frederick St.
Kitchener, Ontario
August 23, 2016

Sign-off Sheet
This document entitled Norfolk County – Asset Management Plan – Fleet was prepared by Stantec
Consulting Ltd. (“Stantec”) for the account of Norfolk County (the “Client”). Any reliance on this
document by any third party is strictly prohibited. The material in it reflects Stantec’s professional
judgment in light of the scope, schedule and other limitations stated in the document and in the
contract between Stantec and the Client. The opinions in the document are based on conditions
and information existing at the time the document was published and do not take into account any
subsequent changes. In preparing the document, Stantec did not verify information supplied to it by
others. Any use which a third party makes of this document is the responsibility of such third party.
Such third party agrees that Stantec shall not be responsible for costs or damages of any kind, if any,
suffered by it or any other third party as a result of decisions made or actions taken based on this
document.
Prepared by
(signature)
Mohamed Hegazi, M.A.Sc.
Engineering Intern
Infrastructure Management & Pavement Engineering
Reviewed by
(signature)
Amir Abd El Halim, Ph.D., P.Eng.,
Managing Principal, Infrastructure Management & Pavement Engineering
NORFOLK COUNTY – ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN – FLEET
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................ I
1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1.1

1.1 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES.............................................................................................................. 1.1
1.2 SCOPE OF WORK ........................................................................................................................... 1.1
2.0 STATE OF THE LOCAL INFRASTRUCTURE .................................................................................... 2.1

2.1 FLEET VEHICLES ............................................................................................................................... 2.2
2.1.1 Replacement Cost Valuation ................................................................................. 2.2
2.1.2 Age and Remaining Service Life ............................................................................ 2.3
3.0 DESIRED LEVELS OF SERVICE ..................................................................................................... 3.1
4.0 ASSET MANAGEMENT STRATEGY .............................................................................................. 4.1

4.1 NON-INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS ............................................................................................. 4.1
4.2 MAINTENANCE AND REFURBISHMENT ACTIVITIES ...................................................................... 4.1
4.3 DISPOSAL ACTIVITIES ..................................................................................................................... 4.2
4.4 EXPANSION ACTIVITIES .................................................................................................................. 4.2
4.5 PROCUREMENT METHODS ............................................................................................................ 4.2
4.6 RISKS................................................................................................................................................. 4.3
4.7 ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN FUTURE UPDATES............................................................................ 4.3
5.0 FINANCING STRATEGY .............................................................................................................. 5.1

5.1 HISTORICAL INVESTMENTS ............................................................................................................. 5.1
5.2 FLEET ASSETS REVENUE REQUIREMENTS ....................................................................................... 5.1
iii
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2.1: Fleet and Vehicle Assets.......................................................................................................... 2.1
Table 2.2: Fleet Asset Inventory ................................................................................................................ 2.2
Table 2.3: Current Fleet Replacement Values ....................................................................................... 2.3
Table 2.4: Fleet Vehicle Useful Life ........................................................................................................... 2.4
Table 4.1: Fleet Work Activities ................................................................................................................. 4.1
Table 4.2: Risks Associated with Not Reaching Defined Level of Service Targets ............................ 4.3
Table 5.1: FIR Schedule of Operating Expenses (Schedule 40) ........................................................... 5.1
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2.1: Fleets Estimated Life Consumed ........................................................................................... 2.5
Figure 2.2: Number of Fleet Vehicles by Year – Replacement Profile ................................................ 2.5
Figure 5.1: Fleet 50-Year Capital Cost Distribution................................................................................. 5.2
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX A: FLEET LIST ................................................................................................................ A.1
iv ch w:\active\162010337\facilities_fleet_amp\phase\report\rpt_norfolk_amp_fleet_20160823_fin.docx
Executive Summary
Municipalities are stewards of Community infrastructure. Well-managed infrastructure fosters

prosperity, growth, and quality of life for a Community’s residents, businesses, and visitors.
Most Canadian municipalities are struggling to maintain existing infrastructure under current tax
and rate levels. They continue to deal with downloaded responsibilities and, at the same time,
face growing needs to maintain and renew aged and decaying infrastructure.
The subject of asset management has been gaining increasing public awareness as a result of
the introduction of Bill 175, the Sustainable Water and Sewage Systems Act in 2002, and the
implementation of “Full Cost Accounting” through the Public Sector Accounting Board (PSAB).
The emphasis is now being placed on not only knowing the true cost of providing services to
your customers today, but also understanding what will be required to maintain the services
virtually in perpetuity (or as long as they are required), through the use of life cycle costing. In
other words, we are moving towards Sustainable Asset Management.
Ontario’s Ministry of Infrastructure has also recently released guidelines for the development of
Municipal Asset Management Plans, which support the Province’s 10-year infrastructure plan
“Building Together”. The objective of these guidelines is to provide a basis for the standardization
and consistency of asset management practices across Ontario’s municipalities.
This document follows the Ministry’s guidelines for the development of an Asset Management
Plan for Norfolk County’s Fleet assets.
i
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

This Asset Management Plan has been prepared in response to the Ontario Ministry of
Infrastructure’s Building Together initiative, and provides the County with a medium-term
business plan that will set the path toward long-term sustainability of the County’s infrastructure
and other assets.
1.2 SCOPE OF WORK

The scope and format of this document follows the Ministry of Infrastructure’s Building Together:
Guide for Municipal Asset Management Plans. The Guide outlines the specific elements of a
detailed asset management plan, which includes:
1. Summary
2. Introduction
3. State of Local Infrastructure
4. Desired Levels of Service
5. Asset Management Strategy
6. Financing Strategy
The County has developed individual Asset Management Plans following the Ministry’s guidelines
and suggested format for roads, bridges, and water and wastewater networks.
This document focuses on the County’s vehicle fleet.
ch w:\active\162010337\facilities_fleet_amp\phase\report\rpt_norfolk_amp_fleet_20160823_fin.docx 1.1
2.0 STATE OF THE LOCAL INFRASTRUCTURE
A State of the Infrastructure report provides the County with an understanding of the true cost of
maintaining the assets that are required to provide services to the Community. The following
State of the Infrastructure (SotI) assessment was developed through a Life Cycle Analysis,
covering the County’s vehicle fleet.
The SotI was based on a high-level analysis of the replacement needs of the County’s fleet and
vehicle assets. This included the preparation of a report on the current and assumed future state
of these assets. The following fleet asset types were included in the study.
Table 2.1: Fleet and Vehicle Assets
Heavy Trucks
Medium Trucks
Light Trucks
Fleets/Vehicles
Cars
Construction Equipment
Lawn Equipment
Fire/EMS
Trailers
Miscellaneous
In November 2003, the National Guide for Sustainable Municipal Infrastructure published a Best
Practices for Municipal Infrastructure Asset Management. This publication included a listing of
seven questions, which could be used as a framework for an asset management plan. The SotI
assessment employs this framework:
1. What do you have and where is it?

(Inventory)
2. What is it worth?
(Costs/Replacement Rates)
3. What is its condition and expected remaining service life?
(Condition and Capability Analysis)
4. What is the level of service expectation, and what needs to be done?
(Capital and Operating Plans)
5. When do you need to do it?
(Capital and Operating Plans)
6. How much will it cost and what is the acceptable level of risk(s)?
(Short- and Long-term Financial Plan)
7. How do you ensure long-term affordability?
(Short- and Long-term Financial Plan)
State of the Local Infrastructure

August 23, 2016
The County’s fleet assets include both licensed and unlicensed vehicles, trailers, mowers,
construction equipment, fire and ems vehicles, and shop tools. The total replacement value for
the County’s fleets, including the fire and ems vehicles, is approximately $36.0 million.
2.1 FLEET VEHICLES

The County’s fleet consists of many vehicle types, including trucks, construction equipment, lawn
equipment, trailers, etc. The State of the Infrastructure analysis was based on inventories that
were provided by the County’s Fleet Manager, and what currently exists in the PEARL asset
management system. Table 2.2 summarizes the inventory for each of the fleet types.
Table 2.2: Fleet Asset Inventory
Asset Type Asset Component Inventory

Heavy Trucks 36 vehicles
Medium Trucks 1 vehicle
Light Trucks 84 vehicles
Cars 7 vehicles
Fleet Construction Equipment 35 vehicles
Lawn Equipment 28 vehicles
Fire/EMS 80 vehicles
Trailers 24 vehicles
Miscellaneous 7 vehicles
It is important to note, that while the County does not own the Fire and EMS vehicles, it does
carry out their maintenance.
2.1.1 Replacement Cost Valuation
The County’s analysis for the State of the Infrastructure report did not include an inflation factor
or Net Present Value calculation; therefore, all future investments are expressed in 2015 dollars.
The current replacement value for the Fleet assets is approximately $36.0 million. Table 2.3 shows
a breakdown of the fleet components and the current replacement value for each component.
The current replacement values were obtained from the PEARL asset management system, and
verified with discussions with the County’s fleet staff.
2.2 ch w:\active\162010337\facilities_fleet_amp\phase\report\rpt_norfolk_amp_fleet_20160823_fin.docx

August 23, 2016
Table 2.3: Current Fleet Replacement Values
Current
Asset Asset
Inventory Replacement Value
Type Component
($ millions)
Heavy Trucks 36 vehicles 8.1
Medium Trucks 1 vehicle 0.1
Light Trucks 84 vehicles 2.5
Cars 7 vehicles 0.2
Construction Equipment 35 vehicles 5.7
Fleet
Lawn Equipment 28 vehicles 0.9
Fire/EMS 80 vehicles 17.6
Trailers 24 vehicles 0.4
Miscellaneous 7 vehicles 0.5
Shop Tools 0 vehicles 0.0
$36.0 Million
2.1.2 Age and Remaining Service Life
A useful life span can be assigned to an asset type, such as 12 years of useful life for a heavy
truck. However, there are many conditions that can affect the true life of an asset, such as:
design, and manufacture quality, maintenance standards, and so forth.
The replacement interval for vehicles will vary significantly over the life cycle of the asset. The
process of maintenance and failure is a very dynamic system. Therefore, it is essential that we
take a life cycle approach to assessing the financial needs for the future.
This dynamic process of fleet aging has a significant financial impact attached to it that can be
quantified. Therefore, our financial analysis is based upon a life cycle model that identifies
upcoming trends in fleet replacement and, hence, funding needs.
County staff have the best understanding of the local variables that impact the useful lives of
the fleet vehicles.
As a result, the range of values provided for the typical useful life of a vehicle was adjusted for
the purposes of this Report, based on discussions with County staff, internationally recognized
standards, and Canadian climate and conditions. These values can be refined over time, as
more specific data becomes available. These values do, however, serve a purpose in planning
financial investment requirements on a life cycle basis, with specific projects being identified as
part of the regular budget preparation process. Table 2.4 identifies the useful life used within the
analysis for each Fleet Asset.

August 23, 2016
Table 2.4: Fleet Vehicle Useful Life
Asset Asset Typical Useful Life

Type Component (years)
Heavy Trucks 12
Medium Trucks 10
Light Trucks 7
Cars 7
Construction Equipment 14
Fleet
Lawn Equipment 7
Fire/EMS 12
Trailers 15
Miscellaneous 10
Shop Tools 5
As can be seen from Figure 2.1, over 60% of the Norfolk County’s fleet assets are either reaching
or have exceeded the end of their expected life. In addition, the 64% of the network identified
as being in the last half of their life, suggests that within the next 10 - 15 years, the replacement
requirements will increase significantly. Therefore, within the next 10 -15 years, the County will
need to assess the overall condition of the fleet in more detail, to determine the level of effort
and associated funding required to meet the fleet replacement needs.
There are 124 fleet vehicles that are beyond their expected life.
A key component of this high-level analysis required to estimate the timing of the major
interventions, specifically the refurbishment and/or replacement of the fleet, is the age of the
fleet, which would be based on the purchase year. This data was provided by the County
through data populated in the PEARL system, and formed the basis of the analysis to develop
the 50-year replacement profile for the fleet assets, shown in Figure 2.2.
The profile displayed represents the replacement of the fleet vehicles, and does not include any
form of maintenance or refurbishment. However, while maintenance or refurbishment of the
vehicles may appear to be an attractive option to reduce the cost associated with maintaining
the vehicles, in some cases, the cumulative cost of the maintenance can be similar to that of
replacement. Maintenance costs are dependent upon other factors such as the age of the
vehicle, along with vehicle class or type, as some fleet classes require more maintenance or
refurbishment than others do, where the cost of maintaining the vehicle can amount to a similar
cost as replacing it.

August 23, 2016
Figure 2.1: Fleets Estimated Life Consumed
140
120
100
Fleet Replacements
80
60
40
20
0
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024
2026
2028
2030
2032
2034
2036
2038
2040
2042
2044
2046
2048
2050
2052
2054
2056
2058
2060
2062
2064
2066
Annual Replacement
Figure 2.2: Number of Fleet Vehicles by Year – Replacement Profile
3.0 DESIRED LEVELS OF SERVICE
Levels of Service for the fleets are a combination of the utilization of the fleet vehicles without
interruption and the County’s required and desired maintenance and performance targets to
meet legislative requirements.
It is important that the County first establish performance objectives for the Asset Management
Program (AMP). Some typical examples of performance objectives are listed below:
• Provide safe, functional, and efficient fleet vehicles to accommodate the needs of the
County.
• Maximize functionality and utilization
• Minimize user complaints
• Reduce accelerated deterioration and operational problems due to poor maintenance
• Conduct vehicle replacements at the optimum point in the deterioration cycle
• Conducting benchmarking both internally and with other similar communities
Performance objectives may be based upon legislative requirements, or industry best practices,
and values/goals are agreed upon by the County and User Departments, through Council
policies.
Some suggested levels of service are as follows.
• Less than (x%) of downtime due to mechanical failure

• Fewer than (x) complaints per (time) from County Staff, regarding the condition or safety of
County fleet
• (x%) of vehicles maintained up to the manufacturer’s suggested maintenance schedule
• (x%) of the fleet assets meeting or exceeding recommended safety levels, as prescribed by
the County/Manufacturer/etc.
• Fleet assets are running with (x%) reliability
4.0 ASSET MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
4.1 NON-INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS

Accurate and reasonable population growth forecasting allows the County to adequately plan
the fleet expansions, and ensure that fleet vehicles are purchased only to meet reasonable
demands.
On a project-by-project basis, the County will explore various options, including alternatives to
building new assets, for any major developments being considered in the County.
4.2 MAINTENANCE AND REFURBISHMENT ACTIVITIES

This report deals only with the capital investments associated with purchasing, maintaining, and
replacing the fleet vehicles. It is also important to note that the operating and maintenance
(O&M) costs are not necessarily at the appropriate level for Norfolk County, but for the purpose
of this report, it is assumed that it is.
The various stages in an asset’s life cycle can be split into four distinct phases of activity. These
activities are described in Table 4.1 below for the fleets.
Table 4.1: Fleet Work Activities
Fleet Asset
Activity Definition
Age
Minor Planned activities such as condition assessments, scheduled general 0-25% of

Maintenance vehicle maintenance, cleaning, and so forth. asset life
Maintenance and repair activities are generally unplanned; however,

they can be anticipated and would generally be accounted for with the
Major 25-100% of
County’s annual operating budget. These would include such events as
Maintenance asset life
repairing or replacing specific components of a vehicle, such as brakes,
tires, major components, and so forth.
Major activity required to rehabilitate the vehicle so that it can continue

50-75% of
Refurbishment to provide service for an additional time period, which would mainly be
asset life
conducted on larger vehicles.
Some vehicles will reach the end of their useful life and require
replacement. Experience has shown that the expected life of a vehicle
75-100% of
Replacement can vary, depending upon a number of factors; however, by
asset life
conducting condition assessments periodically, a better understanding
can be gained of the performance of these vehicles.
Asset Management Strategy

August 23, 2016
Refurbishment of a fleet asset may include activities such as engine refurbishment/replacement

and the refurbishment/replacement of other major components of, a vehicle.
Maintenance and refurbishment of the fleet assets should not be limited to when a fleet asset
has failed. Proper maintenance of the fleet assets including carrying out the manufacturer’s
recommended maintenance schedule, periodic condition assessments, proper cleaning, and so
forth, can help with not only increasing the useful life of the fleet, but also keeping the
operational costs of the fleets minimized.
As the fleet asset ages, different repair and maintenance strategies are required to keep the
fleet running safely, efficiently, and reliably. As an example, light trucks, at the beginning of their
useful lives, require periodic oil changes. As the light truck ages, more costly maintenance would
be required to run the vehicle safely, such as brakes, tires, and other components of the truck
that wear with use would need replacing. For heavier machinery and equipment in the fleet
assets, refurbishment can include transmission replacements, engine refurbishments, etc.
The cost of the repair and maintenance of the fleet also increases with age, and therefore,
condition assessments, along with periodic reviews of the cost of operating the fleet should be
conducted in order to assess the optimum point where a fleet asset is replaced.
4.3 DISPOSAL ACTIVITIES

It is recommended for the County to review annual costs to maintain the fleet assets, specifically
fleet vehicles that may be aging beyond the expected life, and vehicles that may be
underutilized, and decide on an optimal point where disposal may be an option.
4.4 EXPANSION ACTIVITIES

The County expects modest growth in the foreseeable future. Expansion activities are reflected
in the County’s master plan. All major purchases of new vehicles should be reviewed to assess
the requirements for the new vehicles, evaluate the necessity of expansion of the fleet asset
portfolio, and assess overall impact on the Community, environment, and so forth, for the various
options available.
4.5 PROCUREMENT METHODS

To ensure the most efficient allocation of resources and funds, the County will consider:
• Bundling vehicle purchases, when appropriate, when issuing tenders, to realize cost-benefits
of economy of scale
Asset Management Strategy

August 23, 2016
4.6 RISKS
Several risks could prevent the County from reaching/maintaining its target level of service for
fleets:
Table 4.2: Risks Associated with Not Reaching Defined Level of Service Targets
Potential Risk Potential Impact Mitigation
• The fleet deteriorates further

• Fleet vehicles show a condition Ensure that annual funding is
decrease maintained at a level that is
Required Funding Not • Fleet vehicles deteriorate beyond a consistent with the investment
Secured condition where required to sustain the County’s fleet
repair/refurbishment is a viable assets
option
• Backlog of work increases
Ensure that sufficient reserve funds
• Fleet condition decreases are available to provide additional
• Fleet vehicles deteriorate beyond a funding required to meet increased
Substantial Increase in
condition where refurbishment is a funding needs resulting from
M&R Unit Costs in Future
viable option exceptional increases in the unit
• Backlog of work increases costs of maintenance/replacements
• Underestimated funding needs Ensure that sufficient reserve funds
Environment Change • More costly maintenance and are available to provide additional
(e.g., severe weather, refurbishment or replacements are funding required to meet increased
high population required to increase useful life funding needs resulting impacts
growth) • More fleet vehicles are needed for associated with population growth,
expansion etc.
4.7 ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN FUTURE UPDATES

The Asset Management Plan for the County’s fleet assets is a living document, and will require
regular review and refinement. Specifically, the County will:
• Review the Asset Management Plan annually and confirm validity of assumptions
• Update the Asset Management Plan every five years
• Further refine its level of service targets by engaging in a Community outreach program, to
help identify the desired levels of service of County’s residents.
5.0 FINANCING STRATEGY
5.1 HISTORICAL INVESTMENTS

The County’s investment in fleet maintenance for the period 2011-2012 is summarized in Table 5.1
below:
Table 5.1: FIR Schedule of Operating Expenses (Schedule 40)
2013 1 2014 1
Asset Type Asset Component
(million) (million)
Fleet Assets Fleets $7.9 $8.0
1 Excludes amortization expense & interest on long term debt
This data was derived from the Financial Information Return (FIR) filed with the Ministry of
Municipal Affairs and Housing (http://oraweb.mah.gov.on.ca/fir/welcome.htm).
5.2 FLEET ASSETS REVENUE REQUIREMENTS

The analysis, which was completed to identify Capital and Operating revenue requirements,
was based upon the following assumptions:
1. All values are calculated in current dollars (2015).

2. Replacement costs were based upon unit costs identified within Appendix A.
An allowance was made in the analysis for Engineering (15%) and Contingencies (5%). No
allowance was included for Utility Costs and Overhead, and Administration.
Therefore, based upon these assumptions, for the period 2016 to 2066, the average annual
revenue required to sustain the County’s Fleets is $4.0 million. Over this same period, and
excluding growth, this represents 11% of the Fleet’s replacement value of $36 million. Figure 5.1
illustrates the revenue profile from 2016 to 2066 derived from the analysis for all the fleet assets.
Financing Strategy
August 23, 2016
$18
$16
$14
$12
$10
Millions
$8
$6
$4
$2
$0
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024
2026
2028
2030
2032
2034
2036
2038
2040
2042
2044
2046
2048
2050
2052
2054
2056
2058
2060
2062
2064
2066
Total Capital Requirements Sustainable Capital Funding
Figure 5.1: Fleet 50-Year Capital Cost Distribution
APPENDIX A
FLEET LIST
FLEET LIST
Vehicle Acquisition
Analysis
Index Asset Name Unit Type: Owner Replacement Year
Life
Value (YYYY):
1 2002 Ford 450 Goshen mini bus Medium Trucks COUNTY $100,000 10 2002
2 2010 Dodge Grnd Caravan SXT Cars COUNTY $61,000 7 2010
3 2010 Dodge Grnd Caravan SE Cars COUNTY $25,099 7 2010
4 2012 Chev. Orlando 1LT Cars COUNTY $25,000 7 2012
5 2013 Chev. Express 2500 Light Trucks COUNTY $25,000 7 2013
8 2005 GMC 2500 Savana Light Trucks COUNTY $35,000 7 2005
9 2006 Dodge Caravan Cars COUNTY $31,330 7 2006
10 2006 Dodge Caravan Cars COUNTY $27,650 7 2006
11 2008 Chev. Express 2500 Light Trucks COUNTY $28,000 7 2008
12 2008 Ford Econoline 2500 Light Trucks COUNTY $33,000 7 2008
13 2010 Ford F150 Light Trucks COUNTY $19,500 7 2010
21 2010 Ford Ranger Light Trucks COUNTY $23,044 7 2010
26 2010 Ford Ranger 4x4 sport Light Trucks COUNTY $28,000 7 2010
27 2010 Dodge Ram 1500 Light Trucks COUNTY $21,000 7 2010
30 2010 Dodge Ram 4x4 Light Trucks COUNTY $25,000 7 2010
31 2010 Ford Ranger Sport 'S' Light Trucks COUNTY $20,200 7 2010
32 2010 Ford Ranger Sport 'S' Light Trucks COUNTY $20,200 7 2010
33 2012 Chev. Silverado Light Trucks COUNTY $19,100 7 2012
35 2012 Ford F150 XLT crew 4x4 Light Trucks COUNTY $20,000 7 2012
36 2013 GMC Sierra Light Trucks COUNTY $27,000 7 2013
ch w:\active\162010337\facilities_fleet_amp\phase\report\rpt_norfolk_amp_fleet_20160823_fin.docx A.1
Appendix A: Fleet List

August 23, 2016
Vehicle Acquisition
Analysis
Life
Value (YYYY):
40 2006 Dodge Ram 1500 ST Light Trucks COUNTY $27,000 7 2006
43 2006 Ford F150 XL Triton Light Trucks COUNTY $27,000 7 2006
48 2008 GMC Sierra WT 1500 Light Trucks COUNTY $27,000 7 2008
65 2009 GMC Sierra 4x4 Light Trucks COUNTY $31,000 7 2009
67 2010 Ford F150 ext cab XL Light Trucks COUNTY $25,900 7 2010
68 2014 Chev. Silverado 1WT Light Trucks COUNTY $22,714 7 2014
69 2014 Chev. Silverado 1WT Light Trucks COUNTY $23,000 7 2014
70 2014 Dodge Ram STR 4x4 Light Trucks COUNTY $26,500 7 2014
71 2015 Chev. Silverado WT 2WC Light Trucks COUNTY $23,500 7 2015
A.2

August 23, 2016
Vehicle Acquisition
Analysis
Life
Value (YYYY):
75 2010 International 7600 p&d Heavy Trucks COUNTY $250,000 12 2010
76 2011 Mack Granite p & d Heavy Trucks COUNTY $245,000 12 2011
79 2002 Sterling LT9500p & d Heavy Trucks COUNTY $240,000 12 2002
81 2003 Sterling p&d Heavy Trucks COUNTY $240,000 12 2003
88 2005 Sterling LT9513 p&d Heavy Trucks COUNTY $240,000 12 2005
96 2007 Sterling LT9513 2wp&d Heavy Trucks COUNTY $240,000 12 2007
103 2010 Freightliner M2 106 Heavy Trucks COUNTY $113,000 12 2010
104 2011 International 7400 SBA Heavy Trucks COUNTY $108,000 12 2011
105 2013 Freightliner 108 SD Heavy Trucks COUNTY $182,900 12 2013
106 2013 Freightliner 108 SD Heavy Trucks COUNTY $182,900 12 2013
109 2007 Sterling L8513 sin. p&d. Heavy Trucks COUNTY $199,000 12 2007
110 2013 Int. 7400 SBA 6x4 Tar dist. Heavy Trucks COUNTY $190,000 12 2013
111 2010 Dodge Ram 3500 4x4 Light Trucks COUNTY $57,000 7 2010
112 2011 Dodge Light Trucks COUNTY $46,000 7 2011
113 2002 Ford F350 4x4 Light Trucks COUNTY $69,000 7 2002
A.3

August 23, 2016
Vehicle Acquisition
Analysis
Life
Value (YYYY):
114 2013 Ford F350 Super cab 4x4 Light Trucks COUNTY $95,000 7 2013
117 2005 Chev Silverado 4x4 3500 Light Trucks COUNTY $69,000 7 2005
120 2015 Ford F350 4x4 p&d Light Trucks COUNTY $69,000 7 2015
122 2007 Ford F350 XL 1t d/box Light Trucks COUNTY $51,000 7 2007
125 2008 Dodge Ram 3500 4x4 Light Trucks COUNTY $63,000 7 2008
126 2009 Dodge Ram 3500 4dc Light Trucks COUNTY $44,000 7 2009
127 2009 Dodge Ram 3500 4dc Light Trucks COUNTY $41,000 7 2009
128 2009 GMC Sierra 3500 HD Light Trucks COUNTY $37,400 7 2009
129 2010 Ont. Inc.UT720-7K Trailers COUNTY $4,000 15 2010
130 1991 Hudson HSE trailer Trailers COUNTY $4,500 15 1991
131 2011 Ezlo Trailer EZB Boat Trailers COUNTY $900 15 2011
132 2011 Ezlo Trailer EZB Boat Trailers COUNTY $900 15 2011
133 2012 Cramero trl 20 ton Trailers COUNTY $21,000 15 2012
134 1993 Cramero Bros. trl Trailers COUNTY $6,500 15 1993
135 2003 Wabash 53' dry van trailer Trailers COUNTY $7,500 15 2003
136 2013 Canada Trailer Trailers COUNTY $3,523 15 2013
137 2004 Meltrail TY1 trailer Trailers COUNTY $2,500 15 2004
138 2004 Meltrail T12 trailer Trailers COUNTY $2,500 15 2004
139 1987 WPC tandem trailer Trailers COUNTY $3,500 15 1987
140 2013 Compact valve maint. trl. Trailers COUNTY $34,631 15 2013
141 2006 Hyland tandem trailer Trailers COUNTY $5,000 15 2006
142 2006 Hytrail 16 tandem trailer Trailers COUNTY $3,880 15 2006
143 2007 Hyland tandem trailer Trailers COUNTY $6,600 15 2007
145 1997 EECO generator trailer Trailers COUNTY $10,000 15 1997
146 2000 Super 261 tandem trailer Trailers COUNTY $4,500 15 2000
147 1988 Homemade trailer Trailers COUNTY $2,500 15 1988
148 1998 Meltrail F16 tandem trailer Trailers COUNTY $15,000 15 1998
149 2008 JCTR tag trl 30t w/l axle Trailers COUNTY $38,000 15 2008
150 2008 STRM washroom trailer Trailers COUNTY $140,000 15 2008
151 1999 Hitchman trailer Trailers COUNTY $6,500 15 1999
152 1990 Hudson trailer Trailers COUNTY $6,500 15 1990
A.4

August 23, 2016
Vehicle Acquisition
Analysis
Life
Value (YYYY):
153 2001 Freightliner FL80 flusher Construction Equipment COUNTY $350,000 14 2001
154 2010 John Deere 770G grader Construction Equipment COUNTY $300,000 14 2010
155 2014 John Deere 770G grader Construction Equipment COUNTY $267,724 14 2014
156 1984 Champion 730A gr/chpr Construction Equipment COUNTY $300,000 14 1984
157 1995 Champion C70A C-ser. Construction Equipment COUNTY $150,000 14 1995
158 1996 Champion 740R grader Construction Equipment COUNTY $300,000 14 1996
159 1996 Champion 740 grader Construction Equipment COUNTY $300,000 14 1996
160 1987 Champion 740 grader Construction Equipment COUNTY $300,000 14 1987
161 2002 New Holland brush chpr Construction Equipment COUNTY $85,000 14 2002
162 2010 John Deere 644K ldr Construction Equipment COUNTY $266,000 14 2010
163 1991 John Deere 644E loader Construction Equipment COUNTY $165,000 14 1991
164 1991 John Deere 210C 4x4 ldr Construction Equipment COUNTY $95,000 14 1991
165 2011 Case 621E loader Construction Equipment COUNTY $154,000 14 2011
166 2012 Volvo L45GS loader Construction Equipment COUNTY $122,050 14 2012
167 1993 John Deere 644G loader Construction Equipment COUNTY $165,000 14 1993
168 2014 Case 821FXR loader Construction Equipment COUNTY $225,400 14 2014
169 1996 Komatsu WA180-1 loader Construction Equipment COUNTY $112,000 14 1996
170 1976 Hough 100 loader Construction Equipment COUNTY $390,600 14 1976
171 2007 Terex TL160 loader Construction Equipment COUNTY $110,000 14 2007
172 2007 Terex TL160 ldr & swpr Construction Equipment COUNTY $110,000 14 2007
173 2009 John Deere 644K ldr Construction Equipment COUNTY $266,000 14 2009
174 2003 JCB 212S backhoe Construction Equipment COUNTY $90,000 14 2003
175 2005 John Deere 4106 bhoe Construction Equipment COUNTY $110,000 14 2005
176 2005 John Deere 4106 bhoe Construction Equipment COUNTY $110,000 14 2005
177 2009 Terex 760B b/hoe Construction Equipment COUNTY $104,000 14 2009
178 1994 Nissan fork lift truck Construction Equipment COUNTY $40,000 14 1994
179 2012 Frtlnr/Elgin swpr MV-3423-D Miscellaneous COUNTY $205,005 10 2012
180 2007 Allianz sweeper M4CHS Miscellaneous COUNTY $186,000 10 2007
181 1992 DynaPack pkr/vbrtr Construction Equipment COUNTY $117,000 14 1992
182 2002 Hamm HD110 road roller Construction Equipment COUNTY $130,000 14 2002
183 19?? Ferguson RWR Construction Equipment COUNTY $80,000 14 1987
184 1993 Super Pac steel rlr 320 Construction Equipment COUNTY $15,000 14 1993
185 2010 Etnyre chip spreader Construction Equipment COUNTY $175,500 14 2010
186 2010 Kubota B3200 HSD Lawn COUNTY $21,500 7 2010
187 2010 Kubota GF1800 4x4 Lawn COUNTY $15,950 7 2010
188 2010 New Holland 4x4 G6030 Lawn COUNTY $20,170 7 2010
189 2010 Kubota GF1800 4x4 Lawn COUNTY $15,950 7 2010
190 2011 Kubota ZD323 (zero turn) Lawn COUNTY $13,000 7 2011
191 2011 Kubota F3680 Lawn COUNTY $23,500 7 2011
A.5

August 23, 2016
Vehicle Acquisition
Analysis
Life
Value (YYYY):
193 2003 Kubota 4wd F3060 Lawn COUNTY $20,000 7 2003
195 2014 Kubota F3990 V1505 Lawn COUNTY $25,000 7 2014
197 2005 Kubota 4x4 B7800 72" Lawn COUNTY $32,000 7 2005
198 2005 Kubota 4x4 B7800 72" Lawn COUNTY $32,000 7 2005
200 2015 Kubota B2650 HSD tractor Lawn COUNTY $33,466 7 2015
201 2006 Smithco Sweep Star 60 Lawn COUNTY $50,000 7 2006
202 2006 Kubota B7800 HST 4x4 Lawn COUNTY $33,000 7 2006
203 2007 Kubota L3940 HST tra. Lawn COUNTY $30,000 7 2007
204 1998 Kubota 4x4 tractor Lawn COUNTY $22,000 7 1998
205 2008 Kubota L3940D Lawn COUNTY $27,000 7 2008
208 2009 Trackless MT6 Lawn COUNTY $154,000 7 2009
209 2014 Kubota B3200 HSD Miscellaneous COUNTY $16,000 10 2014
210 2005 Woodchuck chpr 19G Construction Equipment COUNTY $45,000 14 2005
211 2008 Bandit 150Xp chpr Construction Equipment COUNTY $45,000 14 2008
212 2009 Carlton 2012 chpr Construction Equipment COUNTY $42,000 14 2009
213 2013 Seca 866 rodder trl. Miscellaneous COUNTY $54,184 10 2013
214 19?? Sullivan D1750Q cmprsr Miscellaneous COUNTY $15,000 10 1985
215 1995 Midland road Widener WA Construction Equipment COUNTY $55,000 14 1995
216 2008 Chev. Suburban Fire_EMS EMS $95,000 12 2008
217 2009 Ford Type 3 Fire_EMS EMS $112,000 12 2009
220 2009 Ford Expedition Fire_EMS EMS $70,000 12 2009
221 2010 Ford Expedition Fire_EMS EMS $70,000 12 2010
227 2013 Duratrail Trl. Fire_EMS EMS $4,000 12 2013
228 2013 John Deere gator Fire_EMS EMS $26,000 12 2013
A.6

August 23, 2016
Vehicle Acquisition
Analysis
Life
Value (YYYY):
230 2013 Dodge Caravan Fire_EMS EMS $39,000 12 2013
233 1995 Volvo FE Fire_EMS Fire $350,000 12 1995
234 19?? Boat trailer Fire_EMS Fire $2,500 12 1985
235 1988 Ford Cargo Fire_EMS Fire $310,000 12 1988
236 1993 Ford F700 Rescue Fire_EMS Fire $300,000 12 1993
237 1974 Wiscot Boat trailer Fire_EMS Fire $1,500 12 1974
238 1996 Freightliner FL80 Fire_EMS Fire $350,000 12 1996
242 1991 Ford E350 Rescue Fire_EMS Fire $200,000 12 1991
243 1995 Meltrail Ice Res trlr Fire_EMS Fire $2,500 12 1995
245 1998 International 4900 Fire_EMS Fire $350,000 12 1998
246 1999 GMC C8500 Res Fire_EMS Fire $300,000 12 1999
248 2001 Meltrail Boat trlr Fire_EMS Fire $2,500 12 2001
249 2004 Superior Aeriel Fire_EMS Fire $1,100,000 12 2004
250 2004 Freightliner FM2 Fire_EMS Fire $350,000 12 2004
252 2005 Freightliner M2 Fire_EMS Fire $325,000 12 2005
253 2005 Freightliner res Fire_EMS Fire $210,000 12 2005
255 2006 Meltrail trailer Fire_EMS Fire $2,800 12 2006
258 2004 Chev. Suburban Fire_EMS Fire $60,000 12 2004
259 2006 Kubota RTV 900 Fire_EMS Fire $27,000 12 2006
260 2005 Ford F150 XLT Fire_EMS Fire $42,000 12 2005
261 2007 Surrey 36BLTB Fire_EMS Fire $45,000 12 2007
262 2006 Freightliner FM 2112 Fire_EMS Fire $350,000 12 2006
266 ???? Honda Pump Fire_EMS Fire $1,500 12 1987
267 2000 Ford E350 Fire_EMS Fire $40,000 12 2000
269 2008 E-ONE C2 Fire_EMS Fire $500,000 12 2008
A.7

August 23, 2016
Vehicle Acquisition
Analysis
Life
Value (YYYY):
270 2008 E-ONE C2 Fire_EMS Fire $480,000 12 2008
271 2009 Duratrail tan trl. Fire_EMS Fire $3,000 12 2009
272 2009 Polaris RangerRTV Fire_EMS Fire $16,700 12 2009
273 2009 Dodge Durango SL Fire_EMS Fire $45,000 12 2009
274 2010 Dodge Grand Cvan Fire_EMS Fire $35,000 12 2010
275 2010 Dodge Grand Cvan Fire_EMS Fire $35,000 12 2010
276 2010 E-ONE Typhoon Fire_EMS Fire $480,000 12 2010
283 2012 Spartan TK Fire_EMS Fire $350,000 12 2012
285 2010 Polaris Ranger RTV Fire_EMS Fire $24,000 12 2010
286 2011 Duratrail 12' trl Fire_EMS Fire $4,000 12 2011
289 2012 Argo 750 AP Fire_EMS Fire $26,000 12 2012
290 2014 Pace JV8 trl.(for Argo) Fire_EMS Fire $6,000 12 2014
291 2014 Spartan pumper Fire_EMS Fire $500,000 12 2014
292 2014 Spartan rescue Fire_EMS Fire $425,000 12 2014
293 2002 Meltrail trailer Fire_EMS Fire $2,000 12 2002
294 2015 Spartan LA2 pumper Fire_EMS Fire $500,000 12 2015
295 2013 Vilt 125 trailer & gen Fire_EMS Fire $45,000 12 2013
296 2014 Dodge Ram 1500 Fire_EMS Fire $27,500 12 2014
PD
300 2007 Trailer (Aqua Harvester) Trailers $80,000 15 2007
Marina
Comm.
301 2007 Harvester Lawn $80,000 7 2007
Svcs
Comm.
302 2007 Harvester conveyor Lawn $40,000 7 2007
Svcs
304 1991 John Deere 855 tractor Lawn W&WW $16,000 7 1991
305 1995 John Deere 455 Lawn Norview $15,000 7 1995
306 1985 Bolens 5017H mower Lawn Norview $1,000 7 1985
2002 E-Z-GO Shuttle 954G golf
307 Miscellaneous Norview $2,000 10 2002
cart
308 2005 E-Z-GO G01-TMI golf cart Miscellaneous Norview $2,000 10 2005
A.8

Asset Management Plan Fleet

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Asset Management Plan Fleet

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Asset Management Plan Fleet

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Norfolk County – Asset

Management Plan – Fleet

An overview of the County’s

August 23, 2016

1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1.1

2.0 STATE OF THE LOCAL INFRASTRUCTURE .................................................................................... 2.1

3.0 DESIRED LEVELS OF SERVICE ..................................................................................................... 3.1

4.0 ASSET MANAGEMENT STRATEGY .............................................................................................. 4.1

5.0 FINANCING STRATEGY .............................................................................................................. 5.1

APPENDIX A: FLEET LIST ................................................................................................................ A.1

Municipalities are stewards of Community infrastructure. Well-managed infrastructure fosters

1.1 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

1.2 SCOPE OF WORK

This document focuses on the County’s vehicle fleet.

2.0 STATE OF THE LOCAL INFRASTRUCTURE

Table 2.1: Fleet and Vehicle Assets

1. What do you have and where is it?

State of the Local Infrastructure

2.1 FLEET VEHICLES

Table 2.2: Fleet Asset Inventory

Asset Type Asset Component Inventory

2.1.1 Replacement Cost Valuation

State of the Local Infrastructure

Table 2.3: Current Fleet Replacement Values

2.1.2 Age and Remaining Service Life

State of the Local Infrastructure

Table 2.4: Fleet Vehicle Useful Life

Asset Asset Typical Useful Life

State of the Local Infrastructure

Figure 2.1: Fleets Estimated Life Consumed

Figure 2.2: Number of Fleet Vehicles by Year – Replacement Profile

3.0 DESIRED LEVELS OF SERVICE

Some suggested levels of service are as follows.

• Less than (x%) of downtime due to mechanical failure

4.0 ASSET MANAGEMENT STRATEGY

4.1 NON-INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS

4.2 MAINTENANCE AND REFURBISHMENT ACTIVITIES

Table 4.1: Fleet Work Activities

Minor Planned activities such as condition assessments, scheduled general 0-25% of

Maintenance and repair activities are generally unplanned; however,

Major activity required to rehabilitate the vehicle so that it can continue

Asset Management Strategy

Refurbishment of a fleet asset may include activities such as engine refurbishment/replacement

4.3 DISPOSAL ACTIVITIES

4.4 EXPANSION ACTIVITIES

4.5 PROCUREMENT METHODS

Asset Management Strategy

Potential Risk Potential Impact Mitigation

• The fleet deteriorates further

4.7 ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN FUTURE UPDATES

5.0 FINANCING STRATEGY

5.1 HISTORICAL INVESTMENTS

Table 5.1: FIR Schedule of Operating Expenses (Schedule 40)

5.2 FLEET ASSETS REVENUE REQUIREMENTS

1. All values are calculated in current dollars (2015).

Figure 5.1: Fleet 50-Year Capital Cost Distribution

Appendix A: Fleet List

Appendix A: Fleet List

Appendix A: Fleet List

Appendix A: Fleet List