Insights: The Implications of Globalization
Insights: The Implications of Globalization
Insights: The Implications of Globalization
INSIGHTS
2017 issue 2ihs.com/chemical
Subscribe for free at www.ihs.com/insights
Chemicals and globalization
Page 2
Identifying opportunities in
a turbulent time - China’s
chemical industry outlook
Page 6
The implications
liquids
Page 8
of globalization
Speciality chemicals – surfing
the wave of globalization
Page 10
Commercialization
Protectionism versus opportunity opportunities for chemical
technology
Page 12
Trends in Petrochemicals
Futures Markets: Ethylene
hedging is a new option
Page 13
@IHS4Chemical © 2017 IHS: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or
otherwise, or be stored in any retrieval system of any nature, without prior written permission of IHS Global Limited. Any views or opinions expressed do not necessarily represent
the views or opinions of IHS Global Limited or its affiliates. Disclaimer of liability: Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the quality and accuracy of the information contained
linkedin.com/company/ihs in this publication at the time of going to press, IHS Global Limited and its affiliates assume no responsibility as to the accuracy or completeness of and, to the extent permitted by
law, shall not be liable for any errors or omissions or any loss, damage or expense incurred by reliance on information or any statement contained in this publication. Advertisers
are solely responsible for the content of the advertising material which they submit to us and for ensuring that the material complies with applicable laws. IHS Global Limited and
its affiliates are not responsible for any error, omission or inaccuracy in any advertisement and will not be liable for any damages arising from any use of products or services or
any actions or omissions taken in reliance on information or any statement contained in advertising material. Inclusion of any advertisement is not intended to endorse any views
expressed, nor products or services offered, nor the organisations sponsoring the advertisement. Trade marks : IHS Maritime & Trade is a trade mark of IHS Global Limited.
250,000 14%
12 growth for chemicals also showed signs of weakness.
200,000
The most challenging year was 2015 when demand
Million tons
10
150,000 8 growth dropped to the lowest level since global
100,000 6 financial crisis in 2008. Even in olefin value chains
4 which enjoyed the best profitability, the demand
50,000
2 growth for most derivatives has been slow.
0 0 As China gradually enters into a “New Normal”, the
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 demand growth for chemical is expect to slowdown as
well. IHS Markit forecasts the demand growth for key
■ PE ■ PP ■ Caustic ■ MEOH ■ PET ■ PVC ■ SM ■ Soda ash chemicals will be at around 5-7% per year for the next
■ TDI ■ MDI ■ PC ■ Nitrile rubber ■ Polybutadiene ■ SBR Growth rate four years, significantly below the historically growth
rate. This “New Normal” growth rate will likely
Source: IHS Markit. © 2017 IHS
extend beyond 2020. However, even as growth in
China slows, the country continues represents over Chart 2: Aggregated capacity for benzene, PX, ethylene, propylene,
half of global demand growth, and remains to be the MEG, PTA, methanol
largest growing country. It is still the key driver for 180 60%
global chemical demand growth.
In the meantime, China continues to build up 150
Ownership (Percent)
domestic production capacities in both conventional 120 40
Capacities(Million)
petrochemicals and unconventional chemicals. These
unconventional chemicals include coal-to-chemicals, 90
MTO (from imported methanol), propane dehydroge- 60 20
nation (PDH), and coal-to-MEG. Most of these
unconventional investments were committed during 30
the period of high crude oil price when profitability for 0 0
these unconventional routes to chemicals was very 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
attractive. However, after the collapse of crude oil
Foreign Sinopec PetroChina CNOOC
pricing, the profitability of these unconventional
Local provincial Private Private & local
chemicals has been severely compressed. The new
Source: IHS Markit. © 2017 IHS
investment in this area has fallen sharply after 2015.
Conversely, the conventional petrochemical routes
have turned profitable again, and investment in this high quality products.
area has picked up again. Several mega-size integrated In terms of macro policy, the Chinese government
petrochemical complexes are either under construc- is gradually deregulating the chemical industry. The
tion or in the planning phase. entry barriers into the Chinese chemical industry for
On the back of slower demand growth and a private companies is now much lower. The govern-
continuous capacity growth plan, China will become ment has even started to deregulate the upstream
more self-sufficient. The percentage of import refining sector, which used to be tightly control by a
materials will decline, but the absolute import volume few state-owned oil majors. This lays the foundation
will continue to grow. for private companies to enter into petrochemicals. At
One of the major structural shifts that has hap- the same time, the government is tightening
pened over the past decade is a move to private environmental and safety regulations, thereby
ownership. Back in 2000, there were almost no increasing costs incurred by chemical producers. The
privately-owned chemical companies in China. private companies have the highest cost escalation.
During the rapid growth period, particularly from This will narrow the cost gap between SOEs, foreign
2009 to today, there has been a surge in private companies and private companies. The government is
investments into chemical industry. In fact, the also trying restructure the industry to increase
majority of investments over the past six years were industry efficiency, and also combat pollution which
made by private companies. Figure 2 shows the growth has become a major problem in most of China. This
of capacity and percent of share by major State- will lead to industry consolidation mainly among local
Owned-Enterprises (SOEs), local provincial companies provincial companies.
and private companies for the key base chemicals. In Chinese companies have been looking for overseas
2016, private companies and local provincial compa- growth opportunities through acquisition or grass-
nies accounted for over 40% of capacity share. This root investment. The pace of overseas investment will
trend of privatization makes the Chinese market more likely slowdown in the near term due to government
dynamic, and much less dominated by a few major capital outflow control put in place in Q4 2016.
SOEs. The competition will become more intense, However, this trend is unlikely to come to a halt as
drive down profit margins, and put significant companies continue to look to grow their market
pressure on the SOEs. The private companies tend to share outside China, as well as access resources and
be more efficient in capital investment and production technologies in their ambition of becoming global
management. Therefore, privatization will lead to a first-tier companies.
more competitive and more efficient chemical
industry for the country as a whole. Paul has acquired more than 27 years of experience in the
The trend will also benefit the country’s chemical industry in various areas, including technology,
downstream manufacturing sectors. It will force operation, process engineering, business planning and
chemical manufacturers to be more efficient and consultancy. Paul currently serves as vice president with IHS
provide a higher quality of products and better
services. The downstream consumers will benefit
from a diminished supply monopoly, lower costs and
↘↘Current oversupply of NGL is depressing naphtha significant profit advantage. U.S. and Canadian NGL
demand and pricing, but naphtha tightness is production has surged at an average annual growth
possible after 2020 rate of 6.2 percent, from 104 million metric tons
Growing competition from less costly natural gas (MMT) in 2011, to 141 MMT in 2016, due to supplies
liquid (NGL) feedstocks—much of them coming from from both wet gas fields and tight oil production, and
North American shale gas - have dealt a blow to global more growth is expected.
demand for naphtha. Olefins producers with the existing flexible, or new,
Naphtha, a refined petroleum product derived from ethane-feedstock plants in the U.S., are enjoying an
Nick Rados | Global crude oil and marketed in heavy and light varieties, is advantage due to lower feedstock costs, and for
Business Director, Chemical an important feedstock for production of petrochemi- European producers, the access to abundant supplies
Feedstocks IHS Markit cals and blendstock for gasoline. Together, light and of U.S. ethane feedstocks has given their plants new
E [email protected]
heavy naphtha constitute about 40 percent of the life.
T +1 (832) 619-8593
global gasoline pool. Naphtha is no longer the We are headed into an increasingly oversupplied
L Houston
dominant petrochemical feedstock it once was thanks market. Demand growth for petrochemicals and
to competition from the surging production of NGLs, gasoline has slowed due to a global economic slow-
particularly ethane and propane, as reported in our down, while many producers have been adding
recently published IHS Markit report “Light and naphtha production capacity—resulting in excess of
Heavy Naphtha International Market Analysis: naphtha and depressed prices.
Balancing the Naphtha Surplus,” an indepth naphtha Entering 2017, global demand for naphtha (includ-
market analysis. ing natural gasoline) is 1,180 MMT, and the demand
Prior to the U.S. shale gas and tight oil renaissance, growth has been projected to increase to nearly 1,260
naphtha was the leading feedstock for petrochemical MMT by 2020. That translates to an average annual
and gasoline production, but the jump in production growth rate of 1.7 percent—a strong growth rate for a
of ethane and propane feedstocks gave North refined product, but not enough to absorb increasing
American and Western European petrochemical production of both naphtha and NGLs.
producers a cheaper alternative to naphtha and a While the global market for naphtha will be
250.0
Forecast
200.0
Million Metric Tons
150.0
100.0
50.0
0.0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Light Naphtha to Gasoline Light Naphtha to Stm. Cracking Ethane & LPG to Stm. Cracking
1.1
Forecast
Price Ratio vs. Brent, $/bbl / $/bbl
0.9
0.7
0.5
0.3
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
NAM Light Naphtha / Brent NEA Propane / Brent NAM Propane / Brent
oversupplied until at least 2020, the propane market is paraffinic naphtha is still the predominant feedstock
even more oversupplied, with increasing production for production of olefins, such as ethylene and
coming, not only from U.S. shale resources, but also propylene, while heavy naphtha remains the most
from the Middle East and Russia. Propane prices were important feedstock for production of high-octane
sliding before the onslaught of the U.S. shale renais- gasoline and aromatics chain products, such as
sance, but since then, have plummeted, which in turn polystyrene, PET (polyethylene terephthalate) plastic
put downward pressure on prices for naphtha. and polyester fiber. Gasoline blenders are also at an
The current length in the propane shipping fleet, advantage in the current market because they can buy
along with the opening of the Panama Canal expan- cheaper blendstock at lower prices. Naphtha is cheaper
sion supports incremental trade, but anticipated and octane is relatively cheap at present.
increase in crude and naphtha prices will drive even The current market oversupply does not mean that
greater volumes of low-cost propane to Asia. producers will not have investment opportunities in
The abundance of petrochemical feedstocks is the near to mid-term. Starting in 2020, we foresee a
unlikely to end anytime soon, according to our IHS period where some markets could become short of
Markit analysis, with Saudi Arabia, U.A.E., Kuwait, naphtha, particularly heavy naphtha, if investments
and Russia investing in more naphtha production fall off today. Unlike with light naphtha that can be
capacity. For example, the recent addition of just one substituted with NGL feedstocks to make olefins,
large condensate splitter (Novatek in Russia), has heavy naphtha is indispensable for production of PET
added 4 million tons of naphtha supply, or 3.5 percent plastic and polyester fiber, the fastest growing demand
of global naphtha trade. segment for naphtha.
Ethane imports to Western Europe have already
started from both the Enterprise Products Partners Industry-specific insight alone is not sufficient to make
terminal on the U.S. Gulf Coast and the Sunoco decisions of great scale. Connecting the dots to reveal
Logistics terminal on the U.S. East Coast. Those interdependencies between both adjacent and seemingly
shipments will supply the European facilities of unrelated sectors is required. It’s at these connection
INEOS, SABIC, Reliance, ExxonMobil and others. points where the greatest risks and opportunities await.
Companies are essentially making two different
bets on feedstocks in Europe. While some have bet on Nick Rados, Global Business Director, Chemical Feedstock
excess of U.S. ethane (like those just mentioned IHS Markit, provides an overview of the global naphtha
above), others like Dow and BASF have bet on global market
oversupply of cheaper propane coming from Russia,
the U.S. and Algeria.
In spite of strong penetration of NGLs, a lighter,
North Central and Western Central and Middle East Japan China Other Asia World
America South America Europe Eastern Europe and Africa
50
2015 2016
40
30
20
10
0
Industrials Consumer High tech Media Healthcare Real estate Materials Retail Others
Global population in Q1 2017 = 7.5 billion people. World population density (people/km2)
2050
1980 2015
0-10
10-50
50-100
100-500
500+ The economic center of gravity continues to shift eastward
© 2017 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. Provided “as is”, without any warranty. This map is not to be reproduced or disseminated and is not to be used nor cited as evidence in connection with any territorial claim. IHS Markit is impartial and not an authority on international
boundaries which might be subject to unresolved claims by multiple jurisdictions.
With a relatively low consumption per capita of specialty chemicals in India and China, demand has significant room to grow. In China the current drive towards specialty
chemicals can be traced to 3 main factors:
● The slowdown in heavy industries is reducing demand for basic chemicals and prompting a diversification in portfolios.
● Societal factors such as demand for a more environmentally-conscious way of life have resulted in new environmental protection laws requiring increased use of
specialty chemicals for water treatment; chemicals to combat hazardous air pollutants and many new industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals.
● There is a highly consumer-driven shift as the rapidly growing middle classes require more consumer goods such as electronics, personal care, high-end cosmetics
and food & nutrition products stimulating demand for the specialty chemicals which are used to produce them.
All of these factors are encapsulated in China’s 13th 5 year plan which will also shift emphasis from investment and exports to domestic consumption and innovation in
many of these specialty areas. However most Chinese chemical companies are still relatively weak in specialty chemical R&D capabilities. They lack experience in
developing specialty chemicals and have little familiarity with diversifying products and developing close technical partnerships with consumers. All of these factors are
contributing to a critical need for China to partner with, or acquire, specialty chemical producers outside of China in order to obtain not only strategic resources but also to
secure greater advanced technology and market access and we are seeing strong evidence of this externally focused M&A activity. So the geographical shift is turning full
circle as attention turns to the West again, but now it is expertise and people, rather than investments in plant and machinery which is key.
Adrian Beale, Vice President, Specialty Chemicals
[email protected]
25% 27%
World speciality chemical
markets by regions -
2015 vs 2020
23% 24%
17% 15%
14% 2015 total value 2020 total value
15%
7% 6%
5%
$554 $653 5%
5% bn bn 4%
4% 4%
Commercialization opportunities
for chemical technology
↘↘ The greatest advances in technology development in the history of the chemical industry and notable
have occurred during times of commercial disruption research discoveries continue, there have been many
and other great technical challenges. Witness the commercialization disappointments. Those illustrate
dramatic advances during and after the two world the aspects of risk and reward in technology develop-
wars, and also the leaps in technology in the West ment. The risks are amplified by the need to build
after the USSR launched Sputnik I into Earth orbit in plants at a competitive economy of scale, which
1957. The world may now be in another such requires a “large capital expenditure bet” on a new
disruption due to the populistic anti-globalization technology.
political trend in major democracies. However, For these reasons R&D companies frequently lack
Author | Michael Kratochwill disruption alone is not a strategy for successful resources to fully commercialize their technologies.
Managing Director Transaction technology commercialization, since it brings As a result, the most difficult development hurdles for
Advisory Consulting increased economic risks. inventors are frequently to get the first demonstration
E mike.kratochwill Achieving maximum value from new technologies scale plant and then the first commercial scale plant
@ ihsmarkit.com is critical for chemical companies. Developers have successfully built. Except for companies with
T +1 201-476-7904 historically used the build & operate business model substantial financial and management resources, this
L New Jersey to commercialize their research breakthroughs. is extremely difficult without effectively selling the
W www.ihs.com/chemical consulting However, as many products became commoditized invention to either a large investor or a strategic buyer.
starting in the 1980s, some companies have used the
licensing business model. A review of licensed Commercialization Phases:
chemical technologies indicates a wide range of The typical overall pattern of investment and value
licensing revenue: realization, and the role of key parties in each stage,
• As low as 1 to 3% of total product revenue can be viewed as four phases (see Chart 1). The
• As high as 7 to 10% of product revenue challenge of commercialization is frequently termed
The wide range is primarily due to differences in the the “Valley of Death” in the first three phases for new
strengths and advantages of technologies, potential technologies that don’t “make it”. As a result, many
for market growth, and alternatives available. inventors must cede control of their technology to
Risks in commercialization and scale-up are high for successfully commercialize.
many technologies. Furthermore, many inventions Considering the resources required, technology
turn out to have only modest advantages compared to licensing may be a plausible route to commercializa-
competitors. While successful inventions do abound tion, but it is rare for a major undemonstrated process
technology to be licensed under normal arrange-
Chart 1: Project development lifecycle ments, due to the risks incurred by a licensee.
However, there are many examples of successful
Total value= asset
Phase 1: Phase 2: Phase 3: Phase 4: generated value + partnership arrangements for new technologies. A few
Lab scale, Demonstration 1rs Commercial Nthj Commercial ICAP generated
notable examples:
+ + +
scale scale scale value
Fundamental
Engineering and Business
science, Fundamental
construction development r • Houdry, Socony-Vacuum and Sun Company on
Researchers engineering, pe
EPC company Planners elo catalytic cracking in the 1930s
Process d ev
engineers and financial –Commercial to
sponsors –Technical Va
lue • Halcon International and Atlantic Richfield on
–Economic
propylene oxide in the 1960s
d
pe n • Cargill and Dow Chemical on polylactic acid
tal s
capi
se t
As biopolymers in the 1990s
business fluctuations with the commodity Chart 2: Global patent and trademark applications*
chemical cycle and prices that track with raw (In millions of applications per year)
material prices. 10.0
• Specialty companies compete primarily on the
9.0 © Global patent
®™
advantage of their products in-use and continual applications
8.0
application-oriented development research.
7.0 World trademark
Specialties are less vulnerable to industry cycles, applications
6.0
but remain subject to broad economic cycles.
5.0 Total patent and
• In both the commodity and specialty segments, trademark
companies with advantaged proprietary technolo- 4.0 applications
gies build value by managing new plant invest- 3.0
ments to satisfy the market growth, while they 2.0
advance their technology. This supports custom- 1.0
ers paying for value, and gives the technology 0.0
holder early-mover market strength compared to 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
subsequent “me-too” competitors.
Source: WIPO published statistics on global intellectual property filings. © 2017 IHS
↘↘Increasing volatility in global oil prices, dislocation Both are in compliance with rigoros requirements of
between new feedstock supply sources and consumption the International Organization of Securities Commis-
growth of petrochemicals, heightened geopolitics, sions (IOSCO) principles established in 1983.
proclivity towards risk taking in certain markets, are Futures trading in the petrochemical sector is still a
all factors driving the chemicals sector towards greater nascent activity and the volume of trades, or liquidity,
usage of hedging instruments on futures exchanges. is relatively low. However, we believe that this activity
In a world of rapidly changing prices and uncertain will increase because of the new global risk factors and
supply and demand patterns, it is sensible for buyers expanded petrochemicals trade in the future.
and sellers to hedge price risk against fixed bench-
Lyn Tattum | marks offered by bodies such as the USA’s Chicago Asia and China are at the vanguard of petrochemicals
Vice President, Mercantile Exchange (CME) and Intercontinental futures trading
Exchange (ICE), or the newer Singapore Exchange Asia is a particular focus of market volatility. It is
VP, Oil, Mid-Downstream and
(SGX), or Shanghai Clearing house (SHCH). interesting to note that a general trend towards
Chemicals, IHS Markit
These bodies enable a company to buy or sell speculative trade on Chinese exchanges is speeding
E Lyn.Tattum@ ihsmarkit.com
products at a pre-agreed price based on benchmark the development of Chinese commodity futures
T +44203 159 3711
L London
figures supplied by expert price reporting agencies. markets.
W www.ihs.com/mds IHS Markit is one such agency. We have a long The Shanghai Clearing House (SHCH) was estab-
tradition of price discovery across a range of petro- lished in November 2009 and in 2015 styrene
chemicals in different regions and at different monomer and monoethylene glycol (MEG) swaps were
frequencies: monthly, weekly and daily. Lately we have launched. Small styrene lots of 100 metric tons can be
moved deeper into discovering prices on a daily basis, quoted in RMB.
as increasingly required by the market and exchanges. Purified terephthalic acid (PTA) futures trading
It is commonplace in the world of oil and energy, to options are available available in with lots as small as 5
hedge risk via usage of exchanges and futures prices. In metric tons. Holding times can be short and daily
the energy sector IHS Markit has strong positions in volumes high.
coal and gas futures via the (former McCloskey) coal Overall, Chinese PTA makers are successfully using
index and the Oil Price Information Service (OPIS). futures and almost every PTA producer has a futures
team to manage risks, with new dedicated trading In North America the build - up in shale- based
offices opening up in Shanghai. petrochemicals has led to a vast quantity of very
Beyond China, Singapore’s Securities and Deriva- competitive ethylene and a new production base for
tives Exchange, SGX, operates South East Asia’s largest polyolefins and other derivatives - encouraging more
stock market and is increasingly showing interest in consumption, trading activity, market volatility and
petrochemicals markets, as are the exchanges of desire to trade and hedge the trades.
Indonesia, Hong Kong and others. Historically, consumers of ethylene and derivatives
such as polyethylene (PE) might have hedged against
Western markets are becoming more risk aware as West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil. Futures for
volatility grows natural gas liquids (NGLs), currently the dominant
Elsewhere in the world, drivers for growing interest in ethylene feedstock in the United States, became
futures trading have included the spate of outages available through CME in 2008. But a sustainable
experienced in Europe’s polymer plants in summer petrochemical futures market did not emerge until
2015 which caused a surge in prices and unplanned 2009, when CME launched futures for ethylene at the
risk. Williams hub in Mont Belvieu, TX.
Around the same time period, lower global oil prices The hub is crucial to the market because it gathers
led to soaring gasoline and octane demand, plus ethylene from multiple sources into a single pool,
greater US tight oil production, with its lower octane which aggregates market-wide supply and demand
component, also put strain on octane supply. As a signals, although the producer-shared ethylene
result, PX prices surged in the US and Europe, awaken- pipeline delivery system itself acts as a disincentive to
ing further interest in protective tools such as future spot trades.
trading, to lock in prices. As downstream products build up based on the new
Across the range of petrochemicals, benzene has olefins supply, the new trading contracts on offer point
often been regarded as the most likely candidate for to the option of using ethylene as the hedge for
activity in futures trading. In China alone, benzene polyethylene and other products in the olefins value
imports will escalate from 1.5 MMt/year in 2016 to 2.3 chain, in place of oil.
MMt/y in 2020, driven by the demands of 300 million IHS Markit forecasts that the volume of US PE
middle class consumers. exports to China alone will escalate from 487 thou-
Meanwhile, US benzene imports will rise in the sand mt/y in 2016 to 4.2 MMt/y in 2021 – surely a
same period - from 2.1 MMt/ year to 2.3 MM t/year. figure in itself that calls for robust pricing mechanisms
Much of the US supply will be from Asia with a 6-8 to manage the anticipated heightened trading activity
week shipping time providing a large window of and all the accompanied market complexity that
potential price volatility and risk. will arise.
5 A complex balance
Evidently, a simplistic answer to the somewhat
0 simplistic question of whether NAFTA has been good
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% or bad for its members may result in misleading
Share of U.S. Exports
conclusions (e.g. because of unwanted distortions and
potential intentional manipulation). Moreover, any
Canada 2015 Mexico 2015 Canada 1993 Mexico 1993
retrospective that flashes back beyond 2008 will
Canada and Mexico - Relevance for the US as trade partners
Importance of North America as source of imports - evolution inherently capture the dislocations associated with the
X= Share of US exports, Y= Share of US imports, Bubble size proportianate go imports global economic crisis that was ignited that year.
Nonetheless, a few data points on regional evolution
Source: IHS Markit. © 2017 IHS
between 1993, before NAFTA became effective, and
2015 may serve as food for thought for the reader. Chart 2: Evolution of US goods traded with Canada and Mexico
In 1993, goods’ exports made by NAFTA countries
represented slightly more than 23% of the global total.
By 2015, NAFTA’s participation had decreased to Total 1993: 144.0 billion US$
Exports Total 2015: 516.5 billion US$
slightly more than 14%. Imports followed the same,
albeit weaker, trend: they decreased from almost 28%
of the global total to about 19.5%. In other words, the
role of the NAFTA countries in global trade dimin- Imports Total 1993: 15.1 billion US$
Total 2015: 592.6 billion US$
ished—most certainly a NAFTA-agnostic
development.
0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000
Looking at developments within NAFTA, we find
that during the same period, Canada and Mexico have (Million of US$)
repositioned themselves as trade partners of the U.S. ■ Vehicles (2015) ■ Vehicles (1993)
Canada’s share as a destination of U.S. exports and, ■ Oil, mineral fuels, etc (2015) ■ Oil, mineral fuels, etc (1993)
more notably, as a source of imports suffered a contrac- ■ Electronics and electric equipment (2015) ■ Electronics and electric equipment (1993)
tion. Mexico, on the other hand, improved its position ■ Plastics, rubber, articles thereof (2015) ■ Plastics, rubber, articles thereof (1993)
in both cases. In 2015, Mexico received close to 16% of ■ Computers and data processing eq. (2015) ■ Computers and data processing eq. (1993)
exports made by the U.S. and supplied about 13% of ■ Chemicals and fertilizers (2015) ■ Chemicals and fertilizers (1993)
goods imported by the U.S. (a similar share as Canada). ■ Edible vegetables, fruits, nuts (2015) ■ Edible vegetables, fruits, nuts (1993)
Although total goods traded between the U.S. and ■ Pharmaceutical products (2015) ■ Pharmaceutical products (1993)
Canada exceeded the size of the trade between the
Source: IHS with data from Census Bureau. © 2017 IHS
U.S. and Mexico by almost $45 billion in 2015, the U.S.
had a bigger trade deficit with Mexico than with
Canada (roughly $45 billion more). relocation-- regional growth in light vehicle production has not been able to keep
While the participation of NAFTA partners in U.S. pace with growth in light vehicle sales resulting in a higher proportion of extra-
imports has remained basically unchanged (at around regional light vehicle imports.
26%), Canada and, more significantly, Mexico have At this point, it seems fair to ask whether NAFTA’s extra regional goods imports,
reduced the portion of goods that they source from such as vehicles, would not be even higher today, had the local companies not had
within the region (from more than 69% to over 59%, the possibility to equip their supply chains with the most cost-effective and
and from more than 75% to roughly 50%, respectively). efficient elements (or locations) in order respond to global competition
Interestingly, the share of intraregional exports Chemicals trade, saw huge increases—but remained a small portion of total
made by the U.S. increased between 1993 and 2015, trade. The share of Chemicals and Fertilizers in U.S. imports decreased slightly (to
from slightly more than 30% to over 34%, whereas less than 2% of the total, while their participation in U.S. grew (from about 2% to
Canada and Mexico slightly reduced the proportion of more than 2.5%). One may ask: was the shift caused by NAFTA? By the shale
exports made within the region. In 2015 they revolution? By Mexico’s petrochemical stagnation? By none of the above? What-
represented around 78% for Canada and approximately ever one’s point of view on the subject, it is important to be reminded about all
84% for Mexico. positive and negative consequences of NAFTA that are not as palpable. Here are just
A serious evaluation of NAFTA’s impact on its a few of the positive ones:
members is a complex task. On the other hand, it •A stronger region, with a stronger sense of partnership
seems shockingly easy to confirm the arguments of • A model for the rest of the Americas
isolationists through a superficial glance at trade data • Access to a wider variety of affordable products
looks like an easy way. • Level playing field
Shifts in car production are a common topic in • I ncreased flexibility for producers to optimize value chain
debates about NAFTA. U.S. vehicle exports to Canada • Reduced product piracy
and Mexico more than doubled between 1993 and Right now, it is hard to predict what will be next for NAFTA. Whatever its
2015, and imports increased more than three-fold. mid-term destiny, let us hope that when we look back at it many years in the
Other developments have also taken place during this future, we will be able to say that it was as good for all of North America as it was for
time, though. Through this period, the ups and downs each one of its members.
of crude oil prices, and consequently of gasoline, were
followed by shifts in consumer behavior (in the same Raul joined IHS Chemicals Consulting team as a Director in 2013. Before joining IHS, Raul served for
period, car sales dropped by almost 12% while light six years as a Sr. Consultant and Manager for Latin America at Nexant. During his twenty years in the
truck sales grew by more than 84%). During the global industry, Raul was a long-time collaborator of BASF, where he occupied management positions in
economic crisis, the U.S. government had to come to strategic planning, marketing & sales, and as a business unit leader. Raul holds Masters in Engineer-
the rescue of the local auto industry. Foreign brands ing (Plastics) and Mechanical Engineering degrees from RWTH Aachen University in Germany, and an
have strengthened their position in the region. The Industrial Engineering degree from CeNETI, Mexico. He completed the coursework towards an MBA
net result has been that —despite production at UNAM Mexico and was trained in Management in the Plastics Industry at SKZ/IHK, Germany.
7.0
Russian gas industry still remains largely focused on
6.0
pipeline gas (albeit with significant consumption into
(CAGR*) %
The underutilization of relatively economical NGLs chemical complex in Yamal-Nenets Okrug (West
by the Russian petrochemical industry has, in turn, Siberia) and the Amur gas chemical complex in Amur
undermined the competitiveness of petrochemical Oblast (Russian Far East) that partners SIBUR and
products—a key reason Russian consumption of Gazprom in a joint venture. Rosneft is aiming to shift
petrochemicals has lagged well behind the growth to gaseous feedstock for an existing ethylene cracking
seen in other emerging markets, even during periods unit at the Angarsk petrochemical plant. The plant’s
of robust economic growth. Over the past 15 years LPG loading rack and storage capacity were recon-
Russian GDP demonstrated substantial growth overall structed in 2014, enabling the plant to have increased
(notwithstanding two recessions): during an era of LPG consumption from last year.
high commodities prices: its average annual growth These ambitious plans to utilize gas and NGLs as
rate (CAGR) over this period exceeded 3.5%. Moreo- cracker feedstocks significantly redress the historical
ver, since the population of the country slightly balance which favoured heavier feedstocks in Russian
decreased during this period, GDP growth per capita
was quite substantial, even compared with the rapidly
expanding economies of Asia. At the same time,
growth in ethylene consumption in Russia over
The development of Russia as a player in
2000-16, though significant, lagged behind GDP global polymer markets, predicated on its
expansion, unlike the pattern in other emerging new found appetite for lighter
markets. In Northeast and Southeast Asia, for petrochemical feedstocks, is only likely to
example, ethylene consumption grew faster than GDP
during this period, while ethylene production growth
increase over the next decades.
was quite remarkable in the Middle East due to the
availability of abundant and low-cost NGL feedstocks
(see Figure 1. Ethylene consumption and GDP growth crackers. The competitiveness of the new NGL based
per capita in Russia versus other regions of the world, units is allowing them to target export as well as
2000-16) domestic markets and will swing Russia from being a
A growing realization of the poor competitive net importer of polyolefins such as polyethlene and
position of Russian petrochemical assets due partially polypropylene to a net exporter for the first time.
to feedstock choice along with improving infrastruc- Whilst heavy feedstocks continue to be leveraged
ture for NGL separation and transportation has seen where there is seen to be advantage (reflected in
this start to change. Since 2010, the pace of ethylene proposed projects at Nizhnekamskneftekhim and
expansion has picked up: in 2016 total capacity FEPCO’s proposed refinery + naphtha cracker at
amounted to 3.1 million metric tons per year, up 13% Nakhodka in the Russian Far East), the development
from 2010. Even more important than the expansion of Russia as a player in global polymer markets
of plant capacity during this period was the launch of predicated on its new found appetite for lighter
new transportation infrastructure reconstruction of petrochemical feedstocks is only likely to increase
existing pipelines for rising volumes of NGL produc- over the next decades.
tion in West Siberia (Purovsk-Tobolsk raw NGL This article is a condensed and updated version of a 2016
transportation system). IHS research note “Russia’s Petrochemical Feedstocks Shift to
Although the bulk of Russian output of key NGLs with Increasingly Abundant Domestic Supply” by
petrochemical products, including ethylene, remains Aleksandr Scherbakov, Senior Research Analyst and John C.
concentrated in the Volga-Urals region, the emerging Webb, Director of IHS’s Russian and Caspian Energy team.
new centers of petrochemical production are mainly Additional contributions by Sean Stevenson.
in West Siberia and other regions in relatively close
proximity to abundant gaseous feedstock supplies. At Sean Stevenson is a Managing Director of IHS Chemicals
the vanguard of this was SIBUR’s propane dehydroge- Consulting based in London. He has almost 29 years’ experience
nation (PDH) unit supplying a 500kta polypropylene in the Petrochemicals industry including plant operations
plant which became operational in Tobolsk in 2014, management, commercial and business development roles and
consuming propane separated from West Siberian consulting. He has managed numerous consulting engage-
fields. Further investment here includes SIBUR’s huge ments in Russia and the CIS and monitors industry develop-
new Zapsibneftekhim II petrochemical complex, ments in this region closely.
which will be one of the largest crackers in the world
and will become a major consumer of NGLs and is due
for startup in 2020. Other ambitious ventures
centered around light hydrocarbon feedstock supplies
include Gazprom’s planned Noviy Urengoy gas
3424-TS-0117
www.ihs.com/ChemicalEvents