Political Science Vi

POLITICAL SCIENCE VI
Q. Discuss the purposes and principles of United Nations Organisation. What are its principal organs?
Obviously the urgent and fundamental needs of the peoples are freedom from war and from fear of war. The first
purpose of the United Nations is defined as the maintenance of international peace and security.
The organisation is to employ all peaceful means to prevent or remove threats to peace and suppress acts of
aggression and other breaches of peace.
It is required to adjust or settle in accordance with justice and international law, international disputes and
situations which may lead to conflict. To achieve these results, the United Nations was required to take effective
measures.
The second aim of the United Nations is to adopt means to develop friendly relations among the peoples of all
nations so as to cement the ties of international brotherhood. This friendship among nations should be based on
respect for the principle of the equal rights of and equal self-determination by peoples.
The most fruitful cause of international conflicts is the economic rivalries between nations and other
maladjustments. The United Nations aims to strive for cooperation among countries for solving international
problems of an economic, social, cultural and humanitarian character. This is the third purpose of the United
Nations.
Closely connected with it is the object of promoting and encouraging basic human rights and freedoms for all
peoples without distinction of race, sex, language or religion.
Finally, the United Nations, as the principal world organisation, shall work as a centre for harmonising national
action in order to achieve these common ends. This is described as the fourth purpose of the United Nations.
The above four purposes are the cause and object of the Charter to which the member-States collectively and
severally subscribe. The Charter, then, defines the basic principles on which the United Nations Organisation is
based. These principles are the seven general obligations which bind member-States and the United Nations
Organisation as a whole. The seven obligations are:
1. The United Nations Organisation is based on the sovereign equality of all its members;
2. Each member-State shall fulfill its obligations under the Charter in good faith;
3. All member-States shall settle disputes by peaceful means and in such a manner that peace, security and justice
are not endangered;
4. No member-State shall use force or the threat of force against the territory or independence of any State or in
any manner not consistent with the purpose of the United Nations;
5. No member-State shall help any State against which the United Nations is taking enforcement actions, and every
member-State shall support the Organisation in any action that it takes in accordance with the Charter.
Page 1 of 44
Compiled by Rahul Kumar Singh
6. The United Nations shall ensure that States which are not members act in accordance with these principles as
far as it is necessary for the maintenance of peace and security; and
7. The United Nations shall not intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any
State, or compel any member-State to submit any matter to settlement by the United Nations a principle which
will not apply when coercive measures are applied in order to deal with threats to the peace, breaches of the
peace and acts of aggression.
Principal Organs: The organization operates through its six major organs. They are the General Assembly, the
Security Council, the Economic and Social Council, the Trusteeship Council, the International Court of Justice, and
the Secretariat. Each is represented by a delegation of not more than five representatives.
The General Assembly: The General Assembly is composed of all the member nations. Its members meet annually
at UN Headquarters in New York City. The General Assembly can discuss and make recommendations on any
matter within the scope of the charter. It has been called the "town meeting of the world." Its specific duties
include the election of the members of the Economic and Social Council, the board of the UN Industrial
Development Organization, and some members of the Trusteeship Council. With the Security Council, it elects the
judges of the International Court of Justice. The General Assembly appoints the UN secretary-general on
recommendation of the Security Council. It adopts rules governing the administration of the Secretariat. It als o
approves the United Nations budget. And it decides how much money each member nation should pay to run the
organization. Decisions in the General Assembly may be made by a simple majority vote or, on important
questions, by a two-thirds vote. Smaller nations have a great deal of influence in the General Assembly because
each country casts one vote.
The Security Council: The UN Charter established a Security Council made up of the five nations that in 1945 were
considered the most powerful in the world. The council's primary function was to maintain international peace and
security. The five permanent member nations are the United States, the Russian Federation (in place of the former
Soviet Union), the United Kingdom, France, and China. The UN Charter requires that the permanent members
agree on all decisions made by the council, except for questions of procedure. If even one permanent member
vetoes (rejects) a council decision, that decision is defeated.
The Security Council also has ten nonpermanent members. They serve 2-year terms. Each year the General
Assembly elects five new nations. These nations are chosen from all over the world. This helps ensure fair
representation of all regions. The Security Council is considered always in session. Each council nation must have a
permanent representative at headquarters in New York, so the council can meet on short notice.
The Economic and Social Council: The Economic and Social Council works under the general guidance and control
of the General Assembly. It is composed of 54 member nations that serve 3-year terms. (Eighteen are elected per
year). There are no permanent members. But it has been customary for the nations of major economic
importance, such as the United States and the Russian Federation, to be re-elected. The council deals with major
economic and social concerns. These include economic development, land reform, and control of narcotics. The
council also coordinates the policies and activities of the United Nations and the various specialized agencies.
The Trusteeship Council: The Trusteeship Council was established to help the General Assembly supervise the
administration of territories placed under trusteeship. These territories were primarily former colonies of
European nations. All the territories originally placed under United Nations trusteeship are now independent. The
council is composed of the five permanent members of the Security Council. It meets as circumstances demand.
Page 2 of 44
The International Court of Justice: The International Court of Justice is the principal judicial organ of the United
Nations. It is composed of 15 judges. They are elected to 9-year terms by the General Assembly and the Security
Council. The judges are chosen based on their qualifications rather than their nationalities. However, no nation
may have more than one judge on the court at any given time. The International Court meets at The Hague in the
Netherlands.
The court has two major jobs. It settles disputes submitted by nations for final decision. And it gives advice to
other UN organs and agencies. Its advisory opinions do not have to be accepted. But they carry great weight. In
disputes submitted to the court, however, its judgments are supposed to be followed by all the parties.
The Secretariat The secretary-general heads up the Secretariat, the administrative organ of the UN The secretary-
general may bring any matter to the Security Council that seems likely to endanger international peace. The
General Assembly and the Security Council, as well as the other two councils, may give the secretary-general
special duties to perform.
The secretary-general appoints the staff of the Secretariat under rules approved by the General Assembly. The
staff must be international. That is, each one of the many member nations must be represented. However,
member governments are not allowed to influence the staff. In general the UN Charter emphasizes that the
Secretariat of the United Nations should be an international civil service. It should serve the interests of the
organization and only those interests.
Q. Write down the composition, powers, functions and voting procedure of the General Assembly. Write down
the expanding role of the General Assembly in contemporary world politics.
United Nations General Assembly, one of the six principal organs of the United Nations (UN) and the
only body in which every member of the organization is represented and allowed to vote. The first
session of the assembly convened on Jan. 10, 1946, in London, with 51 countries represented. As of
2006 there were 192 members of the General Assembly. Numerous nonmembers, such as states,
organizations, and other entities (e.g., the Vatican, the African Union, the International Committee of
the Red Cross, and Palestine), maintain observer status, enabling them to participate in the work of the
General Assembly.
Membership:
• All the members of UN are members of General Assembly
• Each member nation is permitted to send 5 representatives out of which only one is entitled to
vote.
• Assembly meets once a year.
• Special sessions may be held during emergencies.
• Decisions are taken by a simple majority and in important cases by a two-thirds majority.
Page 3 of 44
The General Assembly convenes annually and in special sessions, electing a new president each year
from among five regional groups of states. At the beginning of each regular session, the General
Assembly also holds a general debate, in which all members participate and may raise any issue of
international concern. Most work, however, is delegated to six main committees, known as (1)
Disarmament and International Security, (2) Economic and Financial, (3) Social, Humanitarian, and
Cultural, (4) Special Political and Decolonization, (5) Administrative and Budgetary, and (6) Legal.
Forum for multilateral negotiation
Established in 1945 under the Charter of the United Nations, the General Assembly occupies a central
position as the chief deliberative, policymaking and representative organ of the United Nations.
Comprising all 192 Members of the United Nations, it provides a unique forum for multilateral
discussion of the full spectrum of international issues covered by the Charter.
It also plays a significant role in the process of standard-setting and the codification of international law.
The Assembly meets in regular session intensively from September to December each year, and
thereafter as required.
Functions and powers of the General Assembly
According to the Charter of the United Nations, the General Assembly may:
• Consider and make recommendations on the general principles of cooperation for maintaining
international peace and security, including disarmament;
• Discuss any question relating to international peace and security and, except where a dispute or
situation is currently being discussed by the Security Council, make recommendations on it;
• Discuss, with the same exception, and make recommendations on any questions within the
scope of the Charter or affecting the powers and functions of any organ of the United Nations;
• Initiate studies and make recommendations to promote international political cooperation, the
development and codification of international law, the realization of human rights and
fundamental freedoms, and international collaboration in the economic, social, humanitarian,
cultural, educational and health fields;
• Make recommendations for the peaceful settlement of any situation that might impair friendly
relations among nations;
• Receive and consider reports from the Security Council and other United Nations organs;
• Consider and approve the United Nations budget and establish the financial assessments of
Member States;
Page 4 of 44
• Elect the non-permanent members of the Security Council and the members of other United
Nations councils and organs and, on the recommendation of the Security Council, appoint the
Secretary-General.
Pursuant to its “Uniting for Peace” resolution of November 1950 (resolution 377 (V)), the Assembly may
also take action if the Security Council fails to act, owing to the negative vote of a permanent member,
in a case where there appears to be a threat to the peace, breach of the peace or act of aggression. The
Assembly can consider the matter immediately with a view to making recommendations to Members for
collective measures to maintain or restore international peace and security (see "Special
sessions and emergency special sessions”).
While the Assembly is empowered to make only non-binding recommendations to States on

international issues within its competence, it has, nonetheless, initiated actions—political, economic,
humanitarian, social and legal—which have affected the lives of millions of people throughout the
world.
The landmark Millennium Declaration, adopted in 2000, and the 2005 World Summit Outcome
Document reflect the commitment of Member States to reach specific goals to attain peace, security
and disarmament along with development and poverty eradication; safeguard human rights and
promote the rule of law; protect our common environment; meet the special needs of Africa; and
strengthen the United Nations.
The search for consensus
Each Member State in the Assembly has one vote. Votes taken on designated important issues, such as
recommendations on peace and security and the election of Security Council members, require a two-
thirds majority of Member States, but other questions are decided by simple majority.
In recent years, a special effort has been made to achieve consensus on issues, rather than deciding by a
formal vote, thus strengthening support for the Assembly’s decisions. The President, after having
consulted and reached agreement with delegations, can propose that a resolution be adopted without a
vote.
Voting Procedure: Voting in the General Assembly on certain important questions, namely,
recommendations on peace and security, budgetary concerns, and the election, admission, suspension
or expulsion of members is by a two-thirds majority of those present and voting. Other questions are
decided by a straightforward majority. Each member country has one vote. Apart from approval of
budgetary matters, including adoption of a scale of assessment, Assembly resolutions are not binding on
the members. The Assembly may make recommendations on any matters within the scope of the UN,
except matters of peace and security under Security Council consideration.[4] The one state, one
vote power structure potentially allows states comprising just five percent of the world population to
pass a resolution by a two-thirds vote.
Page 5 of 44
Expanding role of General Assembly: The improved geographical inclusion and increasing membership
of the General Assembly is positive change for both the Organisation and the international community
as a whole. The independence of so many former colonies has brought the Assembly a fresh and needed
perspective. With a broader membership, the needs of more people can be addressed and met. Their
human rights can be helped to be insured and their voices heard in the most important world forum.
The post-cold war inclusion and participation of former USSR states has also been a positive change for
the General Assembly and the Organisation. This is because the people of these states can now choose
where to align themselves on the international stage and can make their unique voices heard apart from
traditional alliances.
The global preoccupation with terrorism, whether well-grounded or good-intentioned, has been an
obstacle to the guarantee of human rights. Although the General Assembly has at times attempted to
temper and monitor the machinations of the Security Council in this area, it must remain vigilant in the
protection of individual human rights worldwide. The steps taken by the General Assembly to insure
human rights in these instances has been a positive move and hopefully they will continue to adapt and
respond to the powerful steps taken by states and the Security Council during the worldwide so-called
“war on terror.”
The General Assembly would be well served to be more vocal about international issues and conflicts
conventionally thought of to be within only the Security Council’s purview. Regarding the invasion of
Iraq by the United States, it would have been prudent and appropriate for the General Assembly to
declare that the use of force against Iraq was a violation of Article 2(4) of the Organisation Charter and
request that the Secretary-General keep member states informed as to the progress of the
implementation of such a resolution.
The General Assembly’s firm stance against racism and discrimination has been a necessary and
fantastic example to the rest of the world. Their disdain for racism and discrimination sets a helpful tone
within the organisation as a whole in regards to the United Nation’s commitment to monitor, prevent
and punish genocide and ethnic cleansing. General Assembly would be more consistent and credible in
this goal if they were to properly rebuke Israel for their apartheid-like treatment and racist
discrimination against their Arab and Muslim population. If the General Assembly were to reinstate
some version of Resolution 3379 with nuanced language that would be a positive step towards letting
the world know that the condemnation of racism, hatred and discrimination is indeed a universal
condemnation applicable to all states, and for the protection of all people.
The General Assembly’s commitment to development, the fight to end poverty and other pressing social
and cultural issues is a change that has certainly been for the better. With the numerous bodies they
have established to work towards such goals, the future of the poverty and education initiatives looks
optimistic.
One positive move that the General Assembly can make is to continue to bear in mind the 1950 Uniting
For Peace resolution that potentially allows for the General Assembly to take up security matters left
unresolved by the Security Council. It would also be productive and helpful if the General Assembly were
Page 6 of 44
to more closely evaluate the doings of the Security Council other than by simply reading their annual
report.
The further inclusion of NGOs into the processes and work of the General Assembly has been a positive
change that reflects a commitment in seeking truth and acting competently in all matters. The General
Assembly would be well served to continue to consult with and listen to NGOs while at the same time
retaining their impartiality and commitment to the truth of a matter besides the potential biases of the
NGO itself. It is true that NGOs can be biased and that certain NGOs can be driven by an agenda not in
total accordance with international peace, friendship and equality. However, many NGOs are a
wonderful asset to the UN and should be valued as such.
Is the General Assembly in need of reform?
Yes, say many experts on the United Nations and leading donor nations. Efforts to revitalize the
assembly’s work focus on increasing its power vis-à-vis the Security Council, as well as improving the
quality of debate within the body. But the assembly has continued to resist deep-seated reforms, a
reflection of the rift between its many members from the developing world, who want to retain a strong
say in deliberations, and the wealthy nations that serve as the United Nations’ main donors.
In 2005, Secretary-General Kofi Annan presented a report that criticized the assembly for focusing
excessively on reaching consensus and passing resolutions that reflected “the lowest common
denominator” of opinions. Michael W. Doyle, an international affairs expert at Columbia University, says
the assembly is “an important institution that has never quite sorted out its role” in terms of being a
truly deliberative and functional body, and has “insufficient deliberation and not enough genuine
discussion.” Doyle, who was an aide to Annan, says that the assembly could enhance its relevance by
holding hearings with expert testimony. The assembly has made an effort in recent years to make its
work more substantive and relevant. Resolution 59/313, adopted in 2005, established a more influential
role for the assembly’s president to help achieve this goal by authorizing the president to propose
interactive debates and expanding the resources available to this office.
Q. Write down the composition, functions, voting procedure of the Security Council. Is there any real need of
changing its composition? Why Security Council is called the “Enforcement Wing" of UNO?
The Security Council of the United Nations has primary responsibility under the UN Charter for the
maintenance of international peace and security, and its resolutions are binding on all member states.
During the first forty-five years of its existence, the Council was largely paralysed by the Cold War, but
since 1990 and the thawing of the global political climate, it has been very active.
Composition
The Security Council is composed of fifteen UN member States, five of which are permanent members --
United States, the United Kingdom, France, the Russian Federation, and China. The permanent members
have the power to ‘veto’ a substantive decision of the Council by voting against it. The veto is cast much
Page 7 of 44
less often now than it was during the Cold War, but it is still very much in use as a threat which blocks
Council action.
The other ten members of the Council are elected by the General Assembly to two-year non-renewable
terms, with five new members elected each year. The ten elected members, known in Charter language
as "non-permanent members," are selected according to a distribution formula from each of the world's
major regions. The non-permanent members are not eligible for immediate re-election. The Security
Council meets formally in both private and public sessions. The meetings normally take place in the
Security Council Chamber at UN headquarters in New York and there the Council votes on resolutions
and conducts other official business. The Security Council meets occasionally in private, mainly to decide
on its recommendation of a candidate for the position of the UN Secretary-General. Since 1990, the
Council has conducted most of its business in private "consultations" (informal and off-the-record
meetings) which are held on most weekdays during the year. Meetings are chaired by the President, an
office that rotates each month on an alphabetical basis among the Council's membership.
Need of Change in Security Council's composition
The question of the size of the Security Council has become more important again of late, especially
because the number of UN member states has grown since the Security Council's last reform in 1965.
And as it has the authority to interfere with the sovereignty of a country, as an intstitution it needs an
increased democratic legitimation.
In addition, most of the new conflicts the UN Security Council deals with originate in developing or
emerging nations. Another new tendency is that countries from the southern hemisphere supply the
largest detachments of troops for peacekeeping missions and in this way contribute repeatedly to the
diplomatic solution of conflicts. These aspects have lead to increased importance for a reform of the
Security Council.
A more fundamental problem is that the composition of the P5 reflects the world dynamic at the war's
end in 1945. But that balance of economic and political power has changed significantly. The Soviet
Union has disintegrated — its seat is now held by the Russian Federation — and China's nationalist
government was toppled by the communist regime four years after the U.N. was founded. Meanwhile,
vanquished nations Germany and Japan have rebounded as leading economic powers, along with
developing nations India and Brazil, all of which have pressed for permanent status on the Security
Council.
Whether those nations, or others such as South Africa, get such status, and whether permanent
members should retain their individual veto, are delicate and difficult questions, in part because each of
the P5 would have to agree to cede power, which doesn't seem likely (the U.S. and Russia seem
particularly resistant). But as former U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan argued recently, the Security
Council risks losing relevance if it doesn't adapt. And that could make an already unstable world even
more dangerous.
Page 8 of 44
Functions and powers of the Security Council: Under the Charter, the functions and powers of the
Security Council include the following:
I. To maintain international peace and security: The primary responsibility of the Security Council is to
maintain world peace and security. In order to maintain world peace and security the Security Council
acts on behalf of the all member states and all Member States are obligated to comply with Council
decisions. The Security Council is bound by the principle and purposes of the organization and can not
work arbitrarily. The primary responsibilities of the Security Council are as follows:
• To maintain world peace and security in accordance with the principles and purposes of the UN.
• To formulate plans for establishing a system to regulate armaments.
The primary powers and functions of the Security Council in regard to maintain world peace and security
are to be exercised by two means:
A. Specific settlement of disputes by peaceful means.
B. Taking enforcement action.
A. Specific settlement of disputes by peaceful means: The Council may assist in the settlement of
disputes by friendly relations through mutual understanding and partnerships among nations based on
respect for the principle of justice and to bring all the worlds nations together to work in solving
international problems. The Security Council has following power in this respect:
• To call upon the parties to a dispute to settle it by peaceful means.
• To investigate any dispute or situation which might lead to international friction and to
recommend methods of adjusting such disputes or the terms of settlement.
• To encourage the peaceful settlement of local disputes through regional arrangements and to
use such regional arrangements for enforcement action under its authority.
B. Taking enforcement action: Under the Charter, the Security Council deals with the action with
respect to threat or breach of peace, acts of aggression. The Security Council has following power in this
respect:
• To determine the existence of a threat to the peace or act of aggression and to recommend
what action should be taken e.g.
· Economic sanctions, arms embargoes, financial penalties and restrictions, and travel bans,
severance of diplomatic relations or Blockade.
• To call upon the parties concerned to comply with such provisional measures as it deems
necessary or desirable to prevent an aggravation of the situation.
Page 9 of 44
• To call on members of the United Nations to take measures not involving the use of armed force
— such as sanctions — to give effect to the Council’s decisions.
• To resort to or authorize the use of force to maintain or restore international peace and
security.
II. Function relating to election process: The Security Council also performs some elective functions. The
Security Council and the general assembly separately elect the judges of international court of justice
and also recommend the appointment of the secretary general of the United Nations. The secretary
general shall be appointment on the basis of recommendation of the Security Council. The Security
Council elects its own president for presiding the meetings.
III. Supervisory functions: The Security Council also performs some supervisory functions. The Security
Council supervises the function of the organization as a whole although its supervisory functions are not
wide as that of the general assembly but it has been conferred upon some very important functions in
regard to the expulsion and suspension of the members. The Security Council has following power in this
respect:
• To request the International Court of Justice to give an advisory opinion on any legal question.
• To recommend to the General Assembly the admission of new members to the United Nations.
• To recommend to the General Assembly to suspended membership against whom preventive or

enforcement action has been taken and to restored membership to the United Nations.
IV. Constituent functions: The Security Council also performs some Constituent functions. The Security
Council amends the charter of united nation. According to Article 108 'Amendment to the present
charter shall come into force for all members of General Assembly and ratified in accordance with their
respective constitutional processes by two third of the members of the United Nations, including the
permanent members of the security council. No Amendment to the present charter is possible unless
and until all the permanent members of the security council give affirmative vote on it subsequently
ratified by their respective government. In respect of the Constituent power of the Security Council is an
important organ then the General Assembly.
Conclusion: To conclude I can say that, the Security Council is one of the principal organs of the United
Nations with vast power for the maintenance of international peace and security. But due to non co-
operation and conflict among Big powers the Security Council has not found desire results to restore
peace and security in the disturbed areas of the world.
Voting procedure of Security Council:
UN Security Council takes actions on any matters by voting to issue resolution. Each member of the
Security Council shall have one vote. There are two kinds of matters that the UN Security Council must
vote on. One is calling procedural matters that require any nine votes from the 15 members of the UN
Security Council. The other one is substantive matters. On substantive matters, too, the affirmative
Page 10 of 44
majority of the nine members, as against seven before 1 January, 1966, are required, but the affirmative
majority of nine votes must include the concurring votes of all the permanent members that is, there
should not be any negative vote (veto) from any of the permanent members (Under Article 27 of the
UN Charter).
A negative vote (veto) by a permanent member prevents adoption of a proposal even if it has received
the required number of affirmative votes. Because of this procedure, resolutions on substantive matters
are hard to get pass. There are many criticisms around this matter and there are also calls for a reform
of the voting procedure especially on the veto power of the permanent members.
Any decision to impose sanctions, either economic or military, must be taken with the concurrence of
the five permanent members even if one of them is a party to the dispute which is before the Council.
It means that any permanent member, by disagreeing with the majority, can veto the proposition. This
process of obtaining concurring votes of all permanent members is known as the unanimity of the “Big
Five.”
There is, however, one exception to this rule. When the Security Council is considering peaceful
settlement of a dispute, a member-State which is a party to the dispute abstains from voting.
Only the members participate and vote in the proceedings of the Security Council, but in certain
circumstances countries not represented on the Council and even countries not members of the United
Nations may participate in the proceedings without the right of voting.
This may happen, first, whenever the Council considers that the interests of any particular member-
State are specially affected in the discussion of any question. Secondly, if a member is a party to a
dispute under consideration of the Security Council, it must be invited to participate in the discussion
without a vote.
Even States which are not members of the United Nations may be invited to participate in the discussion
of any dispute to which they are a party on just conditions to be laid down by the Council. The Security
Council elects its own President and that office rotates month by month among members
Q. What are the principal responsibilities of the Secretary General of the United Nations Organization? What
kind of a role does he play in world politics today? What are the importance of the position of the Secretary
General is increasing the present day international political situation?
The Secretary-General of the United Nations plays a very critical role in international relations and maintenance of
a peaceful world order. Perhaps the most important of such critical roles is the use of his “good offices” 1 to serve
as a mediator in conflict situations. The Secretary-General through the usage of his good offices takes steps
Page 11 of 44
publicly and in private, drawing upon his independence, impartiality and integrity, to prevent international
disputes from arising, escalating or spreading.
As the symbolic head of the UN, the Secretary-General is equal parts diplomat and advocate, civil servant and chief
executive officer. He is a symbol of United Nations ideals and spokesman for the interest of the world’s people, in
particular the poor and vulnerable. As the chief administrative officer of the UN, the Secretary-General is
responsible for a wide range of administrative, managerial and substantive tasks. As noted above, one of the
Secretary-General’s most important roles is the ability to use his good offices to serve as a mediator in conflict
situations. While the Security Council authorises the peacekeeping missions and the General Assembly approves
fund, it is the Secretary-General who often play the essential role of engaging with and mediating between the
conflicting parties. But the basic duties of the Secretary-General are comprised in attending sessions of UN bodies;
consulting with world leaders, governments and others; and carrying out country visit to meet with people, stayed
informed on issues and report on various conditions. He thus issues an annual report on the work of the UN which
appraises its activities and outlines future priorities.
THE SECRETARY GENERAL AS A LEGAL ACTOR
On the face of it, it would seem that the UN Charter does not clearly spell out the roles or powers of the Secretary-
General of the Organisation. Thus, Article 7 simply prepares the ground for his pre-eminence by listing the
Secretariat, where he presides as the chief administrative officer, among the 6 “principal organs” of the United
Nations. Following this is Article 97 which merely describes him as the “chief administrative officer” of the UN. It
must be pointed out however that he is not merely the chief administrative officer of the Secretariat; he is indeed
the “chief administrative officer” of the UN as a whole. Article 98 goes further than that by providing that he may
be entrusted with “other functions” by the main intergovernmental bodies- other deliberative organs of the UN.
Article 99 however authorises him to bring to the attention of the Security Council “any matter which in his
opinion may threaten the maintenance of international peace and security.” Article 100 secures his independence
by shielding him from any influence that is external to the UN itself. In sum, therefore, the legal basis of the
authority and/or roles of the Secretary-General can be said to lie in Articles 7, 97 and 98 through 101 of the UN
Charter.
THE SECRETARY-GENERAL AS A POLITICAL AND MORAL ACTOR: The Secretary-General’s ability to persuade and
hence influence global affairs also depends, no less, on the formal authority of the office and in part on the
normative acceptability of positions he pushes or takes. His political and moral authority is therefore not exclusive
from his legal role. As we have earlier noted of Trygve Lie, successive Secretaries-General from his time have
cultivated the habit of venturing legal opinions, albeit cautiously. The Secretary-General plays this role cautiously
because, members of the Security Council, particularly the powerful ones, do not typically subscribe to the idea of
the Secretary-General weighing in on interpretive disputes among them. Yet, “legal positions taken by the
Secretary-General are in no way determinative, but they do lend political comfort to those on whose side the
Secretary-General comes down and can complicate the efforts of those he goes against.”
The political activities of the Secretary-Generalship of Dag Hammarskjöld as the second secretary-general of the
UN (1953-1961) were numerous and far reaching than Lie, his immediate predecessor, had been. It was to his
credit as Secretary-General that both the General Assembly and the Security Council had to repeatedly rely on his
initiatives and advice and entrusted important assignments to him. Thus in 1954, the General Assembly set a
precedent when it asked Hammarskjöld to seek the release of 11 US fliers held prisoners by mainland China. The
Assembly resolution left the course of action entirely to the secretary-general’s judgement. Also in 1958,
Hammarskjöld took an active hand in the Jordan-Lebanon crisis. Thus, after a resolution for stronger UN action
Page 12 of 44
failed to carry in the Security Council, he announced that he would nevertheless strengthen the UN action in
Lebanon and “accept the consequences” if members of the Security Council were to disapprove; none did.
Secretary-General Perez de Cuellar, the fifth in that row (1982 – 1991), also helped, rather ingeniously, to
incorporate human rights concerns into peace keeping. Indeed, this has been ranked as one of the greatest
innovations of his time as Secretary-General.
In 1997, Kofi Annan succeeded Boutros-Ghali as the seventh Secretary-General (1997-2006) of the United Nations.
He came into power at a time of the differences between the UN and the U.S governments concerning financial
matters. Annan took steps to reform the Organisation. Thus in 1998, the UN announced that it stood “poised,
finally, to undertake sweeping structural change.” The then 185 member gave strong backing to the reform in
order, according to them, to overhaul the UN and make it more efficient and responsive to the world scene in the
post-Cold War era. Annan’s “sweeping” reform efforts eventually helped straighten and strengthen the relations
between the US. President Clinton praised the reforms and issued strong statements of support for the Secretary-
General.
Clearly, the highlights in the foregoing paragraphs on how different secretaries-general have acted in different
circumstances have illustrated the point that the role and political influence exerts by the Secretary-General, both
within and without the interpretive environment, depends, to a very large extent, not on any material power from
the Charter but on the authority he is able to command using the instrument of persuasion (his good offices) and
the cult of his personality.
CONCLUSION
As we have noted earlier, the political influence that the Secretary-General exerts, both within and without the
interpretive environment, depends, to a very large extent, not on any material power from the Charter but on the
authority he is able to command using the instrument of persuasion and the cult of his personality. And this is why
we have said that, the legal role the Secretary-General plays and the exercise of his political powers of persuasion -
steeped in well-coordinated diplomacy - have always been an oscillation between his normative legal standing and
persuasive moral influence (using his good offices). Moreover, the Secretary-General's ability to influence global
affairs often depends on how the international community regards his moral authority. In relation to such moral
authority, however, past secretaries-general have drawn on their own ethics and religious backgrounds, amongst
others, to straddle the murky waters of national and international politics undergirding the operation of the
Organisation. In sum, the Secretary-General’s ability to persuade, and hence influence, global affairs also depends,
no less, on the formal authority of the office as well as the normative acceptability of positions he pushes or takes.
His political and moral authority is therefore not exclusive from his legal role. They are intertwined.
Finally, it must also be pointed out, that the exercise of international leadership by the Secretary-General of the
UN is still hugely under the influence of the systemic and structural constraints of a unipolar world order whose
bedrock is the principle of state sovereignty. Thus, the Secretary-General does not have the luxury to act in
isolation from the shifting power structures of world politics. Therefore, while he can “unquestionably” use his
good offices to shape policy and shift norms, the latitude and impact of such efforts will always depend as much on
the “exogenous forces” beyond his control.
Q. Discuss the composition, function and role of the ECOSOC. How can it promote functional co-operation in
International Society?
Page 13 of 44
The most striking feature of the Charter is the emphasis it lays on the constructive tasks of peace.
But the authors of the Charter were also aware “that economic and social maladjustments are often the diseases
of which war is the final symptom and they envisaged peace not merely as a period of non-shooting but as the
zestful pursuit of the common good of all mankind.”
This purpose of the United Nations finds a prominent place in the Preamble of the Charter which proclaims that
the peoples of the United Nations are determined “to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger
freedom.”
Article 1 state that it is a primary purpose of the United Nations to achieve cooperation in solving international
problems of economic social, cultural or human rights and fundamental freedoms without distinction of race or
sex, language or religion.
These purposes of the United Nations are realized through the Economic and Social Council, ECOSOC. The
delegates at the San Francisco Conference described the Council as potentially the most important of the organs of
the United Nations.
It consists of fifty four members all elected by the General Assembly.
Eighteen are elected each year and the normal term of office is three years, that is, one-third members retiring
every year. Retiring members are eligible for re-election. Each country elected to the Council has one
representative with one vote and all decisions are taken by a simple majority of those present and voting.
The Council is required to invite any member of the United Nations to participate, without a vote, in its
deliberations on any question which is of particular interest to that member.
It may also make arrangements for representatives of international specialised agencies to participate, without a
vote, in the activities of the Council and its discussions. The Council elects its own President for one year and meets
at least three times in a year.
The Council (Article 45 of the Charter) is responsible for promoting:
(a) Higher standards of living, full employment, and conditions of economic and social progress and development;
(b) Solutions of international economic, social, health and related problems, and international cultural and
educational cooperation;
(c) Universal respect for, and observance of, human rights and fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as
to race sex, language and religion.
For the realization of its purposes the Economic and Social Council performs the following special functions:
1. It makes and initiates studies and reports on all matters within its scope either directly or through an expert
commission.
2. After its investigations are complete, the Council makes its recommendations to the General Assembly or to the
member-States or the specialised agencies.
Page 14 of 44
3. The Council may also submit draft conventions to the General Assembly which are sent, after ratification, to the
member-States for their acceptance and implementation.
4. The Council makes arrangements with the member-States to obtain their reports on the steps taken to give
effect to its recommendations, and to communicate its observations to the General Assembly.
5. The Council is entrusted with the duty of submitting information to the Security Council whenever demanded
and assist in the discharge of its functions.
The Council works through several Commissions, Standing Committees, ad hoc Committees, and Special Bodies.
The Commissions are of two types: functional and regional. Under the first come Economic and Employment,
Transport and Communications, Statistical, Human Rights, Social Status of Women, Narcotic Drugs and Fiscal and
Population problems.
The Regional Commissions are: the Economic Commission for Europe, the Economic Commission for Asia and the
Far East, the Economic Commission for Latin America, the Economic Commission for Africa, etc.
There are four Standing Committees and four special bodies: The Permanent Central Opium Board, the Supervisory
Body, the International Children’s Emergency Fund, and the United Nations Appeal for Children.
Q. Discuss the objectives, composition, powers and functions of the Trusteeship Council of the United Nations
Organization.
The Trusteeship Council is one of the six principal organs of the United Nations. From 1947-1994 it was
instrumental in the decolonization and subsequent independence of territories in Africa and the Pacific.
Trusteeship Council currently only meets "as and where occasion may require".
Chapters XI-XII of the UN Charter concern the work of the Trusteeship Council.
Membership of the Trusteeship Council varied over time, in accordance with Article 86 of the UN Charter.
Members included:
• UN Member States administering trust territories
• Permanent Members of the Security Council not administering trust territories
• "As many other Members elected for three-year terms by the General Assembly as may be necessary to
ensure that the total number of members of the Trusteeship Council is equally divided between those
Members of the United Nations which administer trust territories and those which do not."
Currently, the permanent members of the Security Council serve as members of the Trusteeship Council in
accordance with Article 86 of the Charter.
The Trusteeship Council provides for an international trusteeship system for the administration and supervision of:
1. The territories placed under it by means of trusteeship agreements submitted by the administering powers and
approved by the United Nations;
Page 15 of 44
2. The territories, held under the mandate system of the League of Nations, and territories detached from enemy
States as a result of the Second World War; and
3. The territories voluntarily placed under the trusteeship system.
The aims of the trusteeship system are fourfold:
(i) To further international peace and security;
(ii) To promote advancement of the people and their development towards self- government or independence
depending on the circumstances of each country, the freely expressed wishes of the people and the terms of each
trusteeship agreement;
(iii) To encourage respect for basic human rights and the recognition of the interdependence of the people of the
world
(iv) To ensure equal treatment for all members of the United Nations and equal treatment and justice for their
nationals in social, economic and commercial matters so long as this does not conflict with the welfare of the
inhabitants. The Trusteeship Council functions under the authority of the General Assembly.
Supervision over the administration of the trust territories is exercised by the General Assembly, but in reality it is
carried on by the Trusteeship Council.
It receives reports from the administrations of trust territories, receives complaints and petitions from the peoples
of the trust territories and examines them in consultation with the administering authority, makes annual
inspections of the trust territories, and takes such actions as are in conformity with the terms of the trusteeship
agreements.
The Council is also charged with the formulation of a questionnaire on the political, economic, social and
educational advancement of the inhabitants of each trust territory within the competence of the General
Assembly and is required to make an annual report to the General Assembly upon the basis of such a
questionnaire.
The Trusteeship Council suspended operations on Nov. 1, 1994, after the October independence of Palau, the last
UN territory. In a May 1994 resolution, the Trusteeship Council amended its rules of procedure, agreeing to meet
only as occasion required (by its decision or by request of a majority of its own General Assembly/Security Council
members) rather than annually.
Q. How are the Judges of the I.C.J elected? Explain the functions and Jurisdiction of the I.C.J. What measures
have been taken to preserve the impartiality of Judges? Evaluate the present role of the ICJ in the brief.
International Court of Justice (ICJ) is the successor of the Permanent Court of International Justice. The statute of
Permanent Court of Justice has been adopted for the International Court of Justice (hereinafter referred as
‘Court’). The establishment of the Court became necessary because to attain the end of International law there
must be a judicial organ. So, the Court is the ‘Principle Judicial Organ’ of the International Organization.
Composition- It comprises of 15 members regardless of their nationality from person among high moral character,
who posse’s qualification required in their respective countries for appointment to the highest judicial offices. The
Page 16 of 44
term of members is nine year. They are elected by United Nations General Assembly and the Security Council. Out
of fifteen, five judges are elected every three years and continuity is maintained. They enjoy diplomatic privileges
and immunities when on official business. A judge cannot be dismissed unless it is the unanimous opinion of the
other members of the court that he has ceased to fulfill the required conditions. No judge of ICJ can exercise any
political or administrative function or engage in any other professional work. No judge can act as agent, advocate
or counsel in any case. The ICJ elects a President and the Vice President for a three year term, which can be
renewed. Judges come from very different professional backgrounds and have varying expertise. Some are
professors, others national judges, former diplomats or former legal advisers to their national governments. This
mix of professional experience is enriching for the Court in its decisions making processes. In situations where the
Court does not include a judge possessing the nationality of a State party to a case that State may appoint a person
to sit as a judge ad hoc for the purpose of the case. Judges ad hoc sit on terms of complete equality with elected
judges for those particular proceedings.
Election procedure- The judges of ICJ are elected on the basis of the Root-Phililmore Plan given in 1920. All States
parties to the Statute of the Court have the right to propose candidates. These proposals are made not by the
government of the State concerned, but by a group consisting of the members of the Permanent Court of
Arbitration designated by that State. Each group can put forward up to four candidates, of whom not more than
two may be of its own nationality, whilst the others may be from any other country. The Court may not include
more than one national of the same State. In addition to which, the Court as a whole must reflect the main types
of civilization and the principal legal systems of the world. This principle is reflected in the distribution of
membership of the Court among the principal regions of the world.
Function of court- Function of ICJ is to resolve the dispute between the sovereign states. Disputes may be placed
before the court by parties upon conditions prescribed by the U.N. Security Council. No state, however, may be
subject to the jurisdiction of the court without the state’s consent. Consent may be given by express agreement at
the time the dispute is presented to the court, by prior agreement to accept the jurisdiction of the court in
particular categories of cases, or by treaty provisions with respect to disputes arising from matters covered by the
treaty.
Article 6(2) of the court’s statute, known as the Optional Clause, allows states to make a unilateral declaration
recognizing “as compulsory ipso facto and without special agreement, in relation to any other state accepting the
same obligation, the jurisdiction of the Court in all legal disputes.”
The court has two fold roles:- 1)Contentious Function 2)Advisory Function
Contentious Functions- Only states (member of the UN) can be parties to contentious case.
The Court is competent to entertain a dispute only if the States concerned have accepted its jurisdiction in one or
more of the following ways:
• by entering into a special agreement to submit the dispute to the Court;
• by virtue of a jurisdictional clause, i.e., typically, when they are parties to a treaty containing a provision
whereby, in the event of a dispute of a given type or disagreement over the interpretation or application of the
treaty, one of them may refer the dispute to the Court;
• Through the reciprocal effect of declarations made by them under the Statute whereby each has accepted the
jurisdiction of the Court as compulsory in the event of a dispute with another State having made a similar
Page 17 of 44
declaration. A number of these declarations, which must be deposited with the United Nations Secretary-General,
contain reservations excluding certain categories of dispute.
The Court discharges its duties as a full court but, at the request of the parties, it may also establish ad hoc
chambers to examine specific cases. A Chamber of Summary Procedure is elected every year by the Court in
accordance with its Statute.
Advisory Function- Advisory proceedings before the Court are open solely to five organs of the United Nations and
to 16 specialized agencies of the United Nations family.
The United Nations General Assembly and Security Council may request advisory opinions on “any legal question”.
Other United Nations organs and specialized agencies which have been authorized to seek advisory opinions can
only do so with respect to “legal questions arising within the scope of their activities”.
When it receives a request for an advisory opinion, the Court, in order that it may give its opinion with full
knowledge of the facts, is empowered to hold written and oral proceedings, certain aspects of which recall the
proceedings in contentious cases. In theory, the Court may do without such proceedings, but it has never
dispensed with them entirely.
Advisory proceedings are concluded by the delivery of the advisory opinion at a public sitting.
JURISDICTION: –
Broadly speaking there are two kinds of jurisdiction of the Court – Contentious Jurisdiction, and Advisory
Jurisdiction.
Contentious Jurisdiction: – That jurisdiction of the Court on the basis of which the Court decides any case with the
consent of the parties to the case, is called ‘Contentious Jurisdiction.’ It is fundamental principle of international
law that without the consent of any party to a case, the same shall not be referred to mediation or arbitration. The
same rule is, with some restriction, is applicable to the jurisdiction of the Court. In other words, the Court is not
entitled to initiate any proceeding merely because one party files a case, rather the consent of both the parties are
necessary that dependent is also required to give consent to the case. Contentious Jurisdiction is of three kinds
which may be given as under: a.Voluntary Jurisdiction. b. Ad hoc Jurisdiction. c. Compulsory Jurisdiction.
i). Voluntary Jurisdiction: – That jurisdiction which the parties by virtue of an agreement or treaty confer on Court
is called Voluntary Jurisdiction. In other words, when the parties to a treaty or a contract stipulate that if any
dispute arise in respect of such treaty or contract the dispute shall be referred to the Court for settlement, this
type of jurisdiction of the Court is said to voluntary jurisdiction. So, in voluntary jurisdiction the parties to a dispute
give their assent for the jurisdiction of the Court in advance.
ii). Ad hoc Jurisdiction: – That jurisdiction of the Court when the parties, after the occurrence of the dispute,
confers on Court and in which the Court has no right to take up the case, is said to be Ad hoc Jurisdiction.
iii). Compulsory Jurisdiction: – Compulsory Jurisdiction means that type of jurisdiction which the Court enjoys
without the consent of the parties. In classic international law there is no concept of the Compulsory Jurisdiction of
the Court, but recently it has been contended that no the time has reached to confide the Court with compulsory
jurisdiction. In case of Compulsory Jurisdiction, the Court is to be empowered to take up a case with out the
consent of the parties like municipal Courts. But once again, the application of the Compulsory Jurisdiction at
Page 18 of 44
universal level, depends on the approval of the Nation States. The procedure for the Compulsory Jurisdiction of the
Court has also been laid down.
Advisory Jurisdiction: – Advisory Jurisdiction means that the jurisdiction of the Court by which it may only give an
advisory opinion on a question of law. This does not require the consent of the parties to a case but when any
International Institute (General Assembly or Security Council) ask the Court to give an advisory opinion on the
question. This opinion is not binding on the parties. So, the case may be referred by an international organization
or by any organs within the scope of their activities.
THE REQUIREMENTS OF IMPARTIALITY AND INDEPENDENCE
The ideals of judicial impartiality and independence are complementary but distinct: the former generally seeks to
ensure justice in particular cases, while the latter aims to avoid the influence of external pressures in all disputes
presided over by the judiciary. Judicial “impartiality” requires that a judges have no vested interest (pecuniary or
otherwise) or prejudice in cases over which they preside. Judicial “independence” would prohibit interference by
political or governmental Executives and Assemblies, so as to avoid the danger of political tyranny and to enable
government under the rule of law. A second and equally important aspect of judicial independence is often
overlooked: that of a diversity of ideas, cultures, gender and class represented among members of the judiciary.
This diversity is essential to ensuring that judges do not, inadvertently or otherwise, become instrumental in (or at
least ineffective against) the dominance of already powerful sections of a community.
In principle and to a large extent, in practice, international law demonstrates an impressive commitment to both
ideals of impartiality and independence. Articles 16 and 17 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice (“the
Statute”), for example, are aimed at preserving the impartiality of ICJ judges. Article 16 prohibits any of the fifteen
standing judges of the ICJ from exercising any political or administrative function, or engaging in any other
occupation of a professional nature. Judges may also not act as agent or counsel in any case, or participate in the
decision of a case in which they have previously been connected with in some other capacity (Article 17). Similarly,
there are worthy attempts to protect the independence of ICJ judges from political interference and domination.
As stipulated by Article 18 of the Statute, dismissal of a judge can only occur on the unanimous vote by the other
members of the Court that the judge has ceased to fulfill the required conditions for judicial office. This provision
arguably protects judicial office in the ICJ to an even greater extent than many municipal legal systems where
judges can be removed by the legislative and executive arms of government. There is also some protection against
the tacit undermining of judicial independence by the restriction of financial resources: Article 32 prohibits the
salaries of ICJ judges being decreased during their term in office. An appreciation of the importance of diversity to
judicial independence is evident in Articles 2, 3(1) and 9 of the Statute. Respectively, they stipulate that the Court
shall consist of independent judges elected regardless of their nationality, that no two members of the Court be of
the same nationality and that the “main forms of civilization” and “the principal legal systems of the world” should
be represented in the composition of the Court.
Q. Who coined the name ‘United Nations’? When United Nations officially came into existence? Write a note on
expulsion of U.N. membership.
The name "United Nations", coined by United States President Franklin D. Roosevelt was first used in
the Declaration by United Nations of 1 January 1942, during the Second World War, when representatives of 26
nations pledged their Governments to continue fighting together against the Axis Powers.
Page 19 of 44
In 1945, representatives of 50 countries met in San Francisco at the United Nations Conference on International
Organization to draw up the United Nations Charter. Those delegates deliberated on the basis of proposals worked
out by the representatives of China, the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom and the United States at Dumbarton
Oaks, United States in August-October 1944.
The Charter was signed on 26 June 1945 by the representatives of the 50 countries. Poland, which was not
represented at the Conference, signed it later and became one of the original 51 Member States.
The United Nations officially came into existence on 24 October 1945, when the Charter had been ratified by
China, France, the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, the United States and by a majority of other
signatories. United Nations Day is celebrated on 24th October each year.
Expulsion of Members: provides that a member against which the Security Council has taken preventive or
enforcement action may be suspended from the exercise of the rights and privileges of membership by the
General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council. However, only the Security Council, not the
General Assembly, has the power to restore these rights. Any member that "has persistently violated the
Principles" of the Charter may be expelled from the UN by the same procedure. Up to the end of 2002, no cases of
suspension of rights or expulsion had been recommended by the Security Council.
The case of South Africa: Many states called for the expulsion of South Africa because of its apartheid policies, but
no formal proposal to this effect was made. In 1974, the General Assembly called upon the Security Council to
review the relationship between the UN and South Africa in the light of the constant violation by South Africa of
the principles of the Charter and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The Security Council considered a
draft resolution submitted by Cameroon, Iraq, Kenya, and Mauritania that would have recommended to the
General Assembly the immediate expulsion of South Africa under Article 6 of the Charter. Owing to the negative
votes of three permanent members (France, UK, US), the draft resolution was not adopted. After the council had
reported back to the General Assembly on its failure to adopt a resolution, the president of the General Assembly,
Abdelaziz Bouteflika of Algeria, ruled that the delegation of South Africa should be refused participation in the
work of the General Assembly. His ruling was upheld by 91 votes to 22, with 19 abstentions. Although remaining a
member of the UN, South Africa was not represented at subsequent sessions of the General Assembly. Following
South Africa's successful democratic elections of May 1994, after 24 years of refusing to accept the credentials of
the South African delegation, the General Assembly unanimously welcomed South Africa back to full participation
in the United Nations on 23 June 1994. It also deleted its agenda item on "the elimination of apartheid and the
establishment of a united, democratic and nonracial South Africa."
Q. Write down the importance of “The Universal Declaration of Human Rights”. Discuss how far the United
Nation Organisations has been successful in protecting Human Rights.
On 10 December 1948 the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted and proclaimed the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights. The Assembly called upon all Member countries to publicize the text of the
Declaration and “to cause it to be disseminated, displayed, read and expounded principally in schools and other
educational institutions, without distinction based on the political status of countries or territories.” The Universal
Declaration of Human Rights is the cornerstone for modern day human rights within the framework of the United
Nations.
History and Importance of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Page 20 of 44
Response to the Terrors of World War II: The 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights is probably the most
famous human rights document and at the same time is the cornerstone of international human rights protection.
Up until World War II human rights and its protection were almost exclusively a matter for national constitutions
and only very few questions were ruled on at an international level. The effects of the war and fear of communism
however led to a turnaround. During the war the Allies explained that they were willing to create conditions for all
humans to live in freedom and free from any fear and shortage. Therefore the UN Charter of 1945 contains the
clear order to the community of states to encourage the respect and realisation of human and basic rights.
Breakthrough: In December 1948, following two years of talks within the newly founded UN Human Rights
Commission, where representatives of 18 states under the chairmanship of American Eleanor Roosevelt were in
session, a breakthrough in human rights occurred. The general explanation of the concept of human rights for all
was adopted by the UN General Assembly. 48 states voted in favour of the explanation and 8 abstained. In the
process of emergence came in one part the western tradition of human rights explanations and in the other part
new accentuations particularly in the field of social rights.
Content: The universal declaration is the first comprehensive human rights instrument that elaborates equal
rights with the nation of equality. The preamble recognizes the inherent dignity and “the equal and inalienable
rights of all as the member of family, as the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in world,” and reaffirms
“faith in equal rights of men and women”.
“Article 28, everyone is entitled to social and the international order in which right and freedom set forth in this
declaration can be fully realized.” Everyone have right to liberty, right to equality, and freedom of movement for
all. The universal declaration and UN Charter are the basic provision of international human right law.
It proclaimed the civil, political and social rights, international covenant on economic, social and cultural rights,
international covenant on Elimination all type of Racial discrimination, convention on elimination of all
discrimination against women, convention on the elimination of all form religious tolerance, other agreement deal
with slavery, apartheid, genocide, it deals with specialized agency such as ILO, UNESCO.
This declaration proclaim right to life, liberty and security of all human being and make prohibition of slavery, of
torture and cruel, inhuman treatment, right to fair trial in both civil and criminal matter. It also recognizes the right
to property, privacy, freedom of speech, expression, assembly, Movement. All the people have freedom of speech
and expression as it provision declares “will of people shall be basis of authority of government and requires
“periodic and general election” by universal suffrage.
Article 21 of Declaration provides that “to take part in government of his country directly or indirectly through
chosen representative.” It also provides various rights like equal pay for equal work, right to social security, right to
work, protection against unemployment and to just and favorable remuneration, ensuring for himself and his
family for existence of human dignity and supplemented if necessary, by other means of social protection, right to
standard of living and good health, well being of family and himself.
Article 25 of the declaration provides that “education shall be free” at least in elementary and fundamental stage.
It provides that education shall be directed to full development of human personality and to strengthening of
respect for human right and fundamental freedom.
It shall promote understanding, tolerance and the friendship among all nations, racial groups and shall further the
activities of United Nations for maintenance of peace. Article 24 includes right to rest and leisure which includes
reasonable limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay.
Page 21 of 44
Article 27 deals with cultural rights include “right to freely participate in cultural life of community, to enjoy art and
to share in scientific advancement and its benefit. Article 30, government authority impose lawful restriction of
exercise of certain rights.
SUCCESS OF UNO IN PROTECTING HUMAN RIGHTS
Every December 10, the United Nations observes the anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, in
which the institution affirmed that all human beings should enjoy certain unequivocal rights, including “security of
person…freedom of thought…and education.” On this day, the global community is called on to acknowledge
contemporary human rights issues and achievements.
Since its establishment in 2006, the Human Rights Council has carried out its mission to promote universal respect
for the protection of all human rights in a myriad of both traditional and innovative ways. These include public
scrutiny of every country’s human rights performance in accordance with their international obligations; special
sessions devoted to addressing gross and systematic violations in countries like Syria; fact-finding investigations;
country visits by independent experts charged with monitoring issues ranging from violence against women to
freedom of expression; and technical assistance and capacity-building. As a political body representing the United
Nation’s highly diverse member states, it is both an invaluable instrument for human rights, and an imperfect one.
1. Universal Periodic Review: The Council has recently completed its second round of publicly examining the
human rights record of every member of the United Nations. This unique mechanism allows, for the first time,
an opportunity for any government to raise questions and make recommendations about any other
government’s human rights behavior. It brings recommendations from UN treaty bodies, independent experts
and civil society to the table for discussion in public hearings webcast around the world. The results so far are
encouraging. Over time, more governments are making more action-oriented recommendations, and
governments are accepting more of them. Notably, the five governments receiving the most UPR
recommendations are among the most repressive in the world – Cuba, Iran, Egypt, North Korea and Vietnam.
This process provides a key point of leverage for human rights defenders on the ground and internationally to
hold governments accountable to their promises. It also universalizes and depoliticizes human rights as a core
obligation of international law. This is a vast improvement on its predecessor, the Commission on Human
Rights, which scrutinized only a fraction of UN member states during its existence and only with great effort
and controversy. Systematic follow-up and implementation, along with tying human rights diplomacy and
assistance to the most important recommendations, are needed to continue this progress.
2. Country-specific Scrutiny: While the UPR is an important step in the right direction, it certainly is not enough
to fulfill the Council’s mandate to address dire situations involving gross and systematic violations of human
rights. To that end, the Council has dispatched more independent experts, known as special procedures, as
well as fact-finding missions and commissions of inquiry to examine human rights abuses in some of the most
urgent situations around the world. These include Iran, North Korea, Syria, Burundi, South Sudan, Sri Lanka,
Burma, Cambodia, Libya and Eritrea. Their reports provide authoritative findings on the complex patterns of
violations, identification of responsible actors, and recommendations for accountability and reform. Between
2006 and 2015, the number of country-specific reports submitted by special procedures increased by 104
percent and the number of governments issuing standing invitations to these independent experts almost
doubled to 114. Since 2006, the Council has convened 26 special sessions devoted to urgent cases of human
rights, which one-third of the Council’s members can call at any time. These include two recent sessions on
Syria and on South Sudan and one in 2014 on the atrocities committed by ISIS. Nonetheless, the Council has
failed to act in the face of other urgent crises. To address this problem, the UNGA could allow the Secretary
Page 22 of 44
General, the High Commissioner for Human Rights, or the Security Council to request Council action on
particularly urgent country situations.
3. Commissions of Inquiry: The Council is establishing a growing number of commissions of inquiry to serve as
independent fact-finding bodies to investigate grave violations of human rights, including crimes against
humanity, and to identify perpetrators for the purpose of holding them accountable. This instrument is
designed to document violations and victims quickly, before evidence is destroyed or witnesses lost, and to
begin a process of accountability in situations where national authorities are unwilling or incapable of
conducting proper investigations or trials. Since 2011, the Council has created 17 such commissions covering a
diverse array of countries from Cote d’Ivoire to Sri Lanka. The commission on North Korea delivered a
trailblazing 400-page report in 2014 documenting crimes against humanity – including murder, torture, rape,
enslavement, forced abortions and knowingly causing prolonged starvation – carried out at the highest levels
of government. The report triggered unprecedented attention by the UN Security Council, creation of a UN
human rights field office in Seoul and, more recently, targeted sanctions by the U.S. government. The
commission of inquiry on Syria, with support from a new supplemental body of experts recently established by
the UN General Assembly, is preparing files on specific individuals responsible for massive human rights
violations in that conflict so that, one day, there might be accountability for the victims under international
criminal law.
4. Access to Civil Society: The Human Rights Council is known as the most open and accessible body in the entire
UN structure. This is precisely as it should be given that every human being is entitled to human rights under
international law and deserves a chance to be heard. With the Council meeting three times a year in regular
session, plus UPR and special sessions, side events, expert panels and a regular call for submissions from
nongovernmental organizations, civil society has a special year-round place in the Council’s activities. With
the support of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), the Council’s programs are
ever more transparent through its website and webcasting facilities. Special rapporteurs routinely reach out
to civil society activists and experts on their country missions, a key ingredient for ensuring their work is
relevant to human rights defenders on the ground. UPR is also opening new doors for human rights activists
to make their case directly to government officials for reforms that meet international standards and
establishing systematic follow-up reviews.
Q. Write in brief the peace keeping role of the United Nations Organizations. Discuss various problems of peace
keeping in the present world situation.
The UN Security Council is the main organization of the United Nations dedicated to the resolution of conflicts and
peacekeeping.
It is composed of fifteen members, five of whom are permanent, namely China, France, the Russian Federation,
the United Kingdom and the United States, and ten of which are elected by the General Assembly every two years.
When the Security Council is confronted with a problem that can represent a threat for international peace and
safety, it must first try to resolve the problem peacefully. In die past, the Security Council has acted as mediator or,
in cases of armed conflict, proposed a cease-fire. The Council can also reinforce its decisions by enacting sanctions.
Sanctions are a way for the Council to apply its decisions, constituting a step between a simple condemnation and
armed intervention. Sanctions can include an arms embargo, trade and finance restrictions, the ceasing of air and
Page 23 of 44
sea contact, or diplomatic isolation. Furthermore, the council can also opt for measures that call for more people
and material.
Peacekeeping missions allow the Security Council to watch over the cease-fire and participate in the creation of
conditions for peace. On a few occasions, the Security Council has authorized member States to use all the
necessary’ means to keep the peace, including collective military action.
General Indar Jit Rktye, the former president of the International Peace Academy who has participated in several
peacekeeping missions, defines peace keeping as being ”the prevention, limitation, moderation and cessation of
hostilities between or within States due to the intervention of a third party, which is organized and directed at the
international level and which calls upon military, police and civilian personnel to restore peace.”
Up until the end of the Cold War, the UN only intervened in the majority of cases if the conflict involved two or
more States. This is known as the principle of non-interference. The principle of State sovereignty was ‘officially’
jeered to more than it is today. The first UN mission was in 1948 in Palestine and is still in place. The United
Nations is the truce supervising organization in Palestine. The missions have changed considerably since then.
Indeed, UNTSO was only made up of observers mandated to observe whether the truce was obeyed. However,
with the insistence of Lester B. Pearson, UNEF I, the fist United Nations Emergency Force, was set up during the
Suez Canal crisis in 1956. It was the start of veritable peacekeeping missions supported by military, police and
civilian contingents.
Since the end of the Cold War, peacekeeping has undergone a new change. The operations now occur more and
more often within one country. There are several reasons behind this. First of all, due to a greater access to
information, international public opinion and governments are more aware of what is happening in a country than
in die past. Now when images of extraordinary violence reach us, we no longer accept that such barbarous
conflicts take place, be they religious or ethnic in origin and whether or not they occur within a single country This
was the case for Rwanda, Bosnia, Kosovo, East Timor and, more recently, Sierra Leone. Not so long ago, we would
not even have been aware of conflicts such as these, which occur within a single country.
The other reason comes from the establishment of former colonial powers of State models in countries that had
tradition of this kind. Totally arbitrary borders were laid down, bringing together different ethnic groups, some of
which were able to impose their will on others due their number and education. We can no longer allow the
powers that be of a State to dictate to other minorities. We must establish or impose peace so as to stop
belligerents from committing greater massacres. However, this demands a stronger, more interventionist
approach in defiance of State sovereignty and the principle of non-interference. To accomplish this, peacekeeping
missions must have greater capabilities.
They must be able to rebuild, disarm, supervise elections and ensure that human rights are respected. Intervening
is no longer enough. After such missions, democratic institutions that have never existed or that were destroyed
must be rebuilt and be capable of ensuring equal rights for all citizens. This is the type of mission that took place in
Kosovo and East Timor.
Still, it may be very difficult to establish a durable peace if justice has not first been obtained. There is often no
judicial apparatus left in a country coming out of a conflict. The UN is therefore working to equip itself with the
effective institutions needed to fill the institutional void in countries that are rebuilding after a conflict.
Page 24 of 44
Q. Give a brief account of the efforts of the U.N. towards disarmament since 1980. Do these efforts contribute to
‘arms control’ rather than disarmament?
Arms have remained a crucial (if not the sole) cause of destructive wars that the late twentieth century witnessed.
The race for armaments and claims for arms control or disarmament have become a bone of contention between
many regimes. As M.R. Srinivasan observes “.
The United States and Britain justified war in Iraq on the ground that its ousted President, Saddam Hussem,
possessed Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) and that he would not hesitate to use them against the coalition
forces”.
According to Schelicher “Arms control is used by some writers as a generic term to include any kind of cooperation
with respect to armaments which could curtail the arms race, reduce the probability of war, or limit the scope and
violence.
It includes unilateral decisions of states, informal understanding among them and formally negotiated and
institutionalized agreements. The stress is on reducing the incentives rather than the capacity for war.
Arms control entails the limitation of certain types of weaponry or reduction of armaments”. Arms control
indicates reduction and control of armament. Disarmament is concerned with appeal to continue efforts for
continuous reduction of armaments.
It is concerned with reduction of severe dangers occurring out of arms race. However, it must be noted that the
two are complementary. Arms control is essentially a move towards disarmament.
United Nations Disarmament Commission
In 1952, the General Assembly, by its resolution 502 (VI) of January 1952, created the United Nations Disarmament
Commission (UNDC) under the Security Council with a mandate to prepare proposals for a treaty for the
regulation, limitation and balanced reduction of all armed forces and all armaments, including the elimination of
all weapons of mass destruction. However, it met only occasionally after 1959.
From 1960 onward, disarmament negotiations were carried out by a succession of bodies, starting with the Ten-
Nation Disarmament Committee. This body became the Eighteen-Nation Disarmament Committee in 1962, the
Conference of the Committee on Disarmament in 1969 and ultimately the Conference on Disarmament from 1978.
In 1978, the first special session of the General Assembly devoted to disarmament established a successor
Disarmament Commission as a subsidiary organ of the Assembly, composed of all Member States of the
United Nations. It was created as a deliberative body, with the function of considering and making
recommendations on various issues in the field of disarmament and of following up on the relevant decisions
and recommendations of the special session. It reports annually to the General Assembly.
In light of its function, the UNDC focuses on a limited number of agenda items at each session. In 1989, to allow for
in-depth consideration, it decided that its substantive agenda should be limited to a maximum of four items. From
1993, it has, in practice, dealt with two or three items, each of which has usually been considered for
three consecutive years. In 1998, by its decision 52/492, the General Assembly decided that the UNDC’s agenda, as
of 2000, would normally comprise two substantive items per year from the whole range of disarmament issues,
including one on nuclear disarmament.
Page 25 of 44
The UNDC, which meets for three weeks in the spring, operates in plenary meetings and working groups, the
number of working groups depending on the number of substantive items on its agenda. The five geographical
groups take turns assuming the chairmanship of the UNDC and its working groups.
Over the years, the UNDC has formulated consensus principles, guidelines and recommendations (see below) on
a number of subjects, which have been endorsed by the General Assembly. After 1999 and until 2017, it was
unable to agree on any substantial outcome. In 2017 it succeeded in adopting consensus recommendations
on “Practical confidence-building measures in the field of conventional weapons”.
The UNDC is serviced substantively by the Office for Disarmament Affairs and technically by the Department of
General Assembly Affairs and Conference Services.
The last 20 years have seen mixed results for disarmament negotiations at the United Nations. Nationalist tactics
and vetoes from a handful of States with high levels of dependency on weapons production and trade have
stymied multilateral attempts to strengthen existing treaties such as NPT, BTWC and CCW, and paralyzed CD since
1998. Two highly effective treaties were achieved through humanitarian processes led by cross-regional groups of
enlightened Governments in partnership with transnational civil society exerting pressure and providing
information and strategies. By reframing prohibition treaty imperatives in humanitarian terms rather than in terms
of control and non-proliferation, it became possible to ban anti-personnel landmines and cluster munitions
through treaties that entered into force in 1999 and 2010, respectively. Meanwhile negotiations under United
Nations auspices developed the 2001 Programme of Action on Small Arms and the 2013 Arms Trade Treaty (ATT).
Drawing on these histories and evaluating the role of the United Nations and the comparative effectiveness of
multilateral agreements on disarmament, the treaties with universal humanitarian as well as disarmament
objectives have proved more successful in concrete and security terms than partial treaties limited by the military
interests of dominant States. Regardless of a treaty’s origins and negotiating process, some Governments will
always try to stay outside disarmament agreements. That does not invalidate multilateral disarmament, since hold-
out States become increasingly drawn into compliance (whether or not they formally accede) as treaties become
embedded and respected in international law.
Looking forward, three humanitarian disarmament objectives are being put on the United Nations agenda: a
nuclear ban treaty that would prohibit the use, deployment, production, stockpiling and transfer of nuclear
weapons and require their total elimination; a ban on autonomous weapons intended to preventively ban “killer
robots” before they are deployed and become unstoppable; and a treaty or protocol to prohibit the military use of
highly toxic depleted uranium. Momentum is building to achieve all three treaties. Opposition is limited to a
handful of weapons-dependent Governments—the same few in most cases. As some but not all are in the Security
Council of the United Nations, they are recognized to be influential—but not decisive, as other successful treaties
have demonstrated.
The United Nations was founded for “We the Peoples”. Modern disarmament diplomacy has shown that
prohibiting weapons that a few dominating States want to deploy is feasible, as long as the humanitarian
arguments are persuasive, the ground is prepared well, and an influential cross section of Governments,
humanitarian agencies and civil society actors are willing to move forward, initiate negotiations and achieve
effective treaties.
Page 26 of 44
Q. Examine the success and the failure of the United Nations Organization. Give your own suggestions for the
improvement of the role of United Nations Organizations.
“The United Nations was created 73 years ago to move the world towards peace and cooperation. The
new millennium presents the most appropriate time to review the history of this institution, its
successes and failures, and expectations for its future.” Opinions may differ about the successes and
failure of the United Nations as an instrument for world peace and security. But everyone will agree that
it has played a crucial role in the economic and social advancement of the people. United Nation’s
efforts in the early Cold War era concentrated on the relationships between nations and the issues of
war and peace. Not long into its existence, however, the UN was confronted with the challenges arising
from global interdependence and social and economic inequalities. These new realities served to
broaden the scope of UN activities and chart the future course of its global involvements. For, with the
end of the Cold War, international concerns expanded to include the increasing economic competition
between developed countries, problems of development, environmental degradation, population
growth, and the threat of nuclear proliferation, the violation of human rights, and political
fragmentation or civil wars within national boundaries. It is the Un that is called upon to confront these
new challenges and to develop solutions. Some, concerned with a potential loss of national autonomy,
prefer unilateral to multilateral action. But, because of its mandated principles, many believe that the
UN is the only actor capable of tackling such daunting problems, although they are aware of the UN’s
inadequacies in putting its principles into action.
The Iraq war represents the failure to resolve an international problem through multilateral channels.
For the critics of the United Nations, it represents a failure of that organization. In fact, the UN has been
buried many times by critics, but it has survived. It has survived because the world does need a
multilateral forum and a framework of international rules to create order and assist security. Whatever
difficulty the UN has had in trying to manage divided international opinion over the use of force against
Iraq, it is the belief that the UN will be found once more to be essential in managing the post-conflict
situation in Iraq. It will be essential firstly in addressing Iraq’s humanitarian needs. While the UN may
have been sidelined by countries opting for unilateral action against Iraq, it is somewhat ironic that it
may be called upon to pick up the pieces after the conflict. A range of UN agencies –the World Food
Programme, UNICEF, the UN High Commission for Refugees, the UNDP and the Mine Action Service –
will spring into action to alleviate hardship and suffering of the civilian population. There will also be the
need for UN action to re-establish post-conflict governance and civil functions in Iraq. Those challenging
the relevance of the UN, also, of course, ignore the critical role it plays in wider areas of development,
human rights, refugees and the environment. No other organization is able to confront the plethora of
cross-border challenges: global diseases including HIV/AIDS, malaria and TB, climate change,
environmental degradation, refugee issues, people smuggling, human right, poverty and hunger. It is
how it responds to these cross-border challenges. The UN system continues to the international norms
by which every member state should abide. In today’s globalizing world, no member state, no matter
how powerful it is, can disengage from multilateralism entirely. The UN remains a relevant organisation
and will continue to have a central role to play in the 21st century. Notwithstanding media criticism of
the United Nations, what seems to be forgotten is that the organisation is only as strong as the will of its
member states. The United Nations system relies on the collective will of all its members. It is these
Page 27 of 44
member states that set its priorities. The UN cannot act without their consent. It falls therefore upon us
all to make the UN relevant in today’s world. In this regard, the United Nations and its members are very
aware of the shortcomings of the organisation. For the UN to meet its potential it needs to reform. It
needs to better prioritise its work to meet the needs of member states. This was the essence of the
Secretary-General’s second term reform initiative, which seeks to strengthen the organisation to batter
respond to the priorities established in the Millennium Declaration and to meet the needs of Member
States. The United Nations is not a perfect organisation, but it remains true that any nation-state can
achieve far less in isolation than it can working collectively with other states under UN auspices. The
Secretary-General envisaged his role as an intermediary and a person who manages peace institutions
and also brought about new techniques to the process of peacekeeping. The UN elucidated what human
rights is for the international community. It played an important part in the decolonisation process by
giving formal recognitions to the newly independent and formed countries, and also by aiding them in
their economic and social development. The UN also played a huge role in the formation of international
law. By conducting many international conferences, the UN progressed towards building an
international consensus on major global problems such as population, environment, women’s status,
development, human rights and such other basic concerns. The UN specialised agencies steered major
normative and regulatory arrangements in their respective fields of activities and also gave
humanitarian aid in many crisis-riddled parts of the globe. More recently, in spite of many limitations on
resources and manpower, the UN has somehow responded to a considerable rise in the demand for
peacekeeping forces and other emergency operations in the world. However, in spite of the reasonably
good record of the UN, it is the organisation’s drawbacks that receive the highest attention. Many
members have remarked about the UN’s disappointing performance but without acknowledging the fact
that the organisation can only be as effective as the governments’ allowance of it. No doubt the UN has
deficiencies, but it is generally made a scapegoat of the pitfalls of the member states. Today,
safeguarding human security in its broadest sense mandates a fresh approach both by the UN and the
governments. In the context of enhancing the capacity of the UN to tackle emergencies, there is a need
to clarify and rethink its use of military force. Also, the UN response to many problems like resource
exhaustion, population explosion, environmental degradation and migration is yet to be completely
articulated. Many grave social problems such as women’s position, unemployment of youth, cultural
diversity, education and technology impact are being addressed only now.
The UN has not as yet been able to deal effectively with such global economic issues as currency
instability, indebtedness, protectionism, and inequitable commercial relations. It the Organization is to
realize its potential in the world of the twenty-first century, its members must recognize and resolve a
paradox caused by the altered condition of the world. The association of sovereign states set up half-
century ago to “save succeeding generations from the scourge of war” is now expected to function as
the public service sector of a world community that does not exist as a political entity. In virtually all of
its activities, from peacekeeping to development, from human rights to environmental accords, the
United Nations is being asked to play a larger role and to assume fresh responsibilities at a time when
governments are increasingly anxious to reduce their financial contributions, and increasingly reluctant
to provide the necessary political, military and material support. Governments will only give the needed
support if they see the United Nations as essential for advancing their interests in an effective and
Page 28 of 44
appropriate manner. Grappling with their current concerns, governments con not be expected to invest
in totally new formulas of international organization or world government. The Independent Working
Group on the Future of the United Nations was convened by the Ford Foundation in late 1993 at the
request of Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali to reassess the role, mission, and function of the
United Nations. The Working Group’s Report, The United Nations in Its Second Half –century was
presented to the Secretary-General and released to the public in 1995. The working group was chaired
by Moeen Qureshi, former Prime Minister of Pakistan, and Richard von Weiszacker, former President of
Germany. Throughout these Report, it has been repeatedly stressed the need for the Member States to
provide the leadership, common will and purpose which are necessary to create a more effective United
Nations as it enters its next fifty years. The future United Nations System Change will not come easily. A
great gulf often exists between what is ideal and what is politically possible. For now, the key to
progress is to understand the paradox which confronts the UN, and to work more effectively through
existing mechanisms or, where further change is necessary, to improve those mechanisms. The UN’s
galaxy of organizations must be made to operate as an integrated system within the framework of
agreed policies. Its activities, including peacekeeping, development and social programs, must
complement each other. Its work has to gain a greater understanding among the private and
nongovernmental sectors, the public and the media. These goals are reachable. Indeed, they must be
reached soon, if the United Nations is the fulfill the hopes and aspirations of the peoples of the world
whom it was set up to serve. What might a successful UN system look like some decades hence, when
our children and grandchildren confront these global challenges? Such a vision need not imply a total
transformation of today’s world.
Q. Explain the methods of amending and revision of the charter of U.N. What are the proposals put forward for
revision of the UN Charter? What type of revision of the charter is necessary in contemporary international political
situation
Amendments to the United Nations Charter can be made by a procedure set out in Chapter XVIII of the UN
Charter. The UN Charter has been amended five times since 1945
Amendment Process: Article 108 provides: Amendments to the present Charter shall come into force for all
Members of the United Nations when they have been adopted by a vote of two thirds of the members of the
General Assembly and ratified in accordance with their respective constitutional processes by two thirds of the
Members of the United Nations, including all the permanent members of the Security Council.
Because Charter amendments require the consent of all five permanent members of the United Nations Security
Council—defined in Article 23 of the Charter as "The Republic of China, France, the Union of Soviet Socialist
Republics, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the United States"—it is impossible for
other UN member states to force the permanent five to give up their Security Council 'veto power', by means of a
Charter amendment. Many reformers have described this situation as a Catch-22. According to Global Policy
Forum, "the P-5 are content with the present arrangements and oppose any changes that might dilute or challenge
their power or expand their 'club.' China has already announced it will block permanent membership for Japan,
and the United States has suggested that it will only support Council reform that commands an implausibly 'broad
consensus'".
Page 29 of 44
Article 109 provides for the convening of a "General Conference of the Members of the United Nations" to
consider amendments. In 1955, the UN General Assembly established a committee to meet and report on this
possibility annually. The committee did so until 1967. The requirement that a "proposal to call such a conference
shall be placed on the agenda" of the 1955 General Assembly reflects the intent of the UN Charter's framers that
the original charter would only be a provisional document, until the establishment of a more perfect union within
a decade or two. Many organizations have launched lobbying efforts and petition drives in an attempt to invoke
the provisions of Article 109.
According to the Commission on Global Governance's 1995 report Our Global Neighborhood, "Article 109 of the
UN Charter envisaged Charter revision. A mandatory revision was one idea canvassed at San Francisco, in the
context of the objections to the provision for a veto by countries that were not great powers
The amendments that have been adopted are essentially adjustments made to take account of the huge increase
in UN membership, which has almost quadrupled since 1945. As originally constituted, the 11-member Security
Council and the 18-member Economic and Social Council were considered adequate to reflect the different
interests of the various geographical groupings of states within the organization. However, the admission to the
UN during the late 1950s and early 1960s of large numbers of newly independent African, Asian, and Caribbean
countries created additional groupings. To accommodate their interests without jeopardizing those of the older
groups, the General Assembly, in 1963, adopted amendments to Articles 23, 27, and 61 of the Charter. The first
amendment enlarged the membership of the Security Council to 15; the second required that decisions of the
Security Council be made by an affirmative vote of nine members (formerly seven); the third enlarged the
membership of the Economic and Social Council to 27. All three amendments officially came into force on 31
August 1965.
The Economic and Social Council was enlarged to 54 by an amendment to Article 61 of the Charter, which was
adopted by the General Assembly in 1971 and became operative on 24 September 1973.
Charter Review. Under the Charter, a general conference of UN members "for the purpose of reviewing the
Charter may be held at a date and place to be fixed by a two-thirds vote of the members of the General Assembly
and a vote of any seven members [amended to nine, as of 1965] of the Security Council." In addition, the Charter
provided that if such a conference was not held by the tenth regular assembly session (in 1955), the proposal to
call such a conference should be placed on the agenda. Accordingly, the 1955 General Assembly considered the
matter and decided that a general review conference should be held at an "appropriate" but unspecified date in
the future. A committee consisting of the full UN membership was established to consider the time and place at
which the conference should be held. The Security Council concurred in the General Assembly's decision by a vote
of 9 to 1, with 1 abstention. The committee met every two years until September 1967 without recommending a
conference. It then became inactive, recommending that any member state might request it to meet.
At its 1974 session, the General Assembly established a 42-member Ad Hoc Committee on the Charter to consider
specific proposals from governments for "enhancing the ability of the United Nations to achieve its purposes." The
committee reported to the 1975 Assembly session that there was a fundamental divergence of opinion on the
necessity for carrying out a review of the Charter and made no recommendations for action. The General Assembly
decided, however, to continue the committee as a Special Committee on the Charter of the UN and on the
Strengthening of the Role of the Organization and increased its membership to 47. In pursuit of its mandate, the
committee has met every year since 1975 and has reported to each session of the General Assembly.
For example, in 1988 the Special Committee recommended, and the General Assembly adopted, a "Body of
Principles for the Protection of All Persons under Any Form of Detention or Imprisonment"; in 1990 it proposed the
Page 30 of 44
rationalization of existing UN procedures, which were adopted by the General Assembly; and in 1991, the Special
Committee considered the final text of the Handbook on the Peaceful Settlement of Disputes between States. That
same year the General Assembly requested that the Secretary-General publish and disseminate the handbook.
The Special Committee also considers proposals concerning cooperation between the United Nations and regional
organizations in the maintenance of international peace and security, conciliation rules of the United Nations, and
assistance to other states affected by the imposition of sanctions by the decision of the Security Council, pursuant
to Article 50 of the Charter.
PROPOSALS TO THE UNITED NATIONS FOR CHARTER REVISION
In order to insure the realization of the principles proclaimed in the Preamble of the Charter of the United Nations,
that organization must be given real authority and military power to maintain Peace and uphold international
Justice; it must operate in accordance with the principle of equality of nations large and small; it must become the
guarantor of human rights, faith in which was so eloquently proclaimed in the Preamble.
The authors of the Charter foresaw a time when its terms would need revision and provided, in
articles 108 and 109, for changes and revisions. In this connection, a number of specific and general suggestions
listed below.
I. Membership in the United Nations being an indispensable condition for the preservation of international peace,
no nation should be allowed to leave the organization. It is therefore proposed that Article 6 of the Charter be
amended to read:
A member of the United Nations which has persistently violated the Principles contained in the present Charter may
be subjected by the General Assembly, upon recommendation of the Security Council, to economic and other
sanctions, and, in extreme cases, may be compelled by force to abide by the principles of the Charter.
II. In order to give the General Assembly more freedom of discussion, it is suggested that Article 12 of the Charter
and all references to it which occur in any other Article (such as Articles 10, 11, 35, etc.) be eliminated.
III. It is suggested that membership in the General Assembly be apportioned according to some form of
proportionate representation and Paragraph 1, of Article 18 of the Charter, be amended accordingly.
IV. The Principle of the equality of nations large and small, proclaimed in the Preamble, must not be disregarded or
contradicted in any article of the Charter. Therefore, it is suggested that Article 23 be changed to read:
1. The Security Council shall consist of eleven Members of the United Nations elected by the General Assembly for
a term of two years, no retiring member being eligible for immediate reelection.
2. Each member of the Security Council shall have one representative.
All reference to permanent members of the Security Council found in any of the articles of the Charter to be
eliminated.
V. In conformity with Article 23 (as revised), Paragraph 2 of Article 27 shall read:
Decisions of the Security Council shall be made by an affirmative vote of seven members; provided that in
decisions made under Charter VI , and under Paragraph 3 Article 52, a party to the dispute shall abstain from
voting.
Page 31 of 44
Paragraph 3 of Article 27 to be eliminated.
VI. The maintenance of peace being a task incumbent upon all members of the United Nations, it is proposed that
the first sentence of Paragraph 2, Article 47, be amended to read:
The Military Staff Committee shall consist of the Chiefs of Staff of the members of the Security Council or their
representatives.
VII. In the interest of justice, it is proposed that Article 50 be amended to read:
If preventive or enforcement measures against any state are taken by the Security Council, any other state,
whether a member of the United Nations or not, which finds itself confronted with special economic problems
arising from the carrying out of those measures, shall have the right to ask the Security Council for a solution of its
problems.
VIII. Having been written and adopted during the course of the Second World War, the United Nations Charter at
times reflects the feelings and conditions which prevailed then and which do not exist any longer. It is
inappropriate to perpetuate the use of the term enemy in relation to certain states must inevitably cooperate in
the establishment and the maintenance of world peace. It is suggested that Paragraph 2 of Article 53, as well as
references to "enemy states" in any other article of the Charter, be eliminated.
IX. In the interests of Justice, which is the only principle upon which the edifice of durable peace can be raised, it is
proposed that the International Court of Justice be given compulsory jurisdiction in all legal disputes between
states and Article 35 of the "Statute of the International Court of Justice" be amended to read:
1. The jurisdiction of the Court comprises all cases and all matters especially provided for in the Charter of the
United Nations or in treaties and conventions in force.
2. The states parties to the present Statute declare that they recognizes compulsory ipso facto and without special
agreement, the jurisdiction of the Court in all legal disputes concerning:
a. the interpretation of a treaty;
b. any questions of international law;
c. the existence of any fact which, if established, would constitute a breach of an international obligation
d. the nature or extend of the reparation to be made for the breach of an international obligation;
3. In the event of a dispute as to whether the Court has jurisdiction, the matter shall be settled by the decision of
the Court.
X. It is recommended that United Nations adopt a Bill of Rights, which guarantees to every individual freedom of
speech, of the press, of religion, and of thought, as well as freedom from racial and religious discrimination,
freedom from arbitrary arrest and imprisonment, equality of sexes, equality before law, equality of opportunity,
and other basic human rights. The individual human being is a spiritual as well as a physical creation and the
purpose of society is to provide for the evolution of spiritual qualities in a framework of unity sustained by law.
Page 32 of 44
Areas in which reform of UN is necessary
Seventy two years ago, the United Nations was founded “to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war.”
Looking around the world today, the least one can say is that it is not fully succeeding in this mission. From Nigeria
through the Middle East to Afghanistan and Ukraine, millions are suffering and dying from that scourge, or are
imminently threatened by it, and the United Nations seems powerless to save them.
We have four ideas for making the organization stronger and more effective.
A big part of the problem is that the Security Council, which is supposed to maintain world peace and security on
behalf of all member states, no longer commands respect — certainly not from armed insurgents operating across
borders, and often not from the United Nations’ own members.
Throughout the world, and especially in the Global South, people struggle to understand why, in 2015, the Council
is still dominated by the five powers that won World War II. They are more and more inclined to question its
authority, and the legitimacy of its decisions.
We ignore this threat at our peril. Times have changed since 1945, and the Security Council must adapt.
Almost everyone claims to favor expanding the Council to include new permanent members, but for decades now
states have been unable to agree who these should be, or whether, like the existing ones, they should have the
power to veto agreements reached by their fellow members.
Our first idea aims to break this stalemate. Instead of new permanent members, let us have a new category of
members, serving a much longer term than the nonpermanent ones and eligible for immediate re-election. In
other words they would be permanent, provided they retained the confidence of other member states. Surely that
is more democratic?
Secondly, we call on the five existing permanent members to give a solemn pledge. They must no longer allow
their disagreements to mean that the Council fails to act, even when — for instance, as currently in Syria — people
are threatened with atrocious crimes.
Let the five permanent members promise never to use the veto just to defend their national interests, but only
when they genuinely fear that the proposed action will do more harm than good to world peace and to the people
concerned. In that case, let them give a full and clear explanation of the alternative they propose, as a more
credible and efficient way to protect the victims. And when one or more of them do use the veto in that way, let
the others promise not to abandon the search for common ground, but to work even harder to find an effective
solution on which all can agree.
Thirdly, let the Council listen more carefully to those affected by its decisions. When they can agree, the
permanent members too often deliberate behind closed doors, without listening to those whom their decisions
most directly affect. From now on, let them — and the whole Council — give groups representing people in zones
of conflict a real chance to inform and influence their decisions.
And finally, let the Council, and especially its permanent members, make sure the United Nations gets the kind of
leader it needs. Let them respect the spirit as well as the letter of what the United Nations Charter says about
choosing a new secretary general, and no longer settle it by negotiating among themselves behind closed doors.
Under current procedures, governments nominate their own citizens as candidates for the position. Members of
the Security Council then conduct rounds of secret voting known as “straw polls” to ascertain who has broadest
Page 33 of 44
and deepest support; crucially, the five permanent members use different colored voting slips so that their
preferences — and those they do not favor — are made clear to the other 10 temporary members.
Let us have a thorough and open search for the best qualified candidates, irrespective of gender or region; let the
Council then recommend more than one candidate for the General Assembly to choose from; and let the
successful candidate be appointed for a single, nonrenewable term of seven years. He or she (and after eight
“he’s” it’s surely time for a “she”) must not be under pressure to give jobs or concessions to any member state in
return for its support. This new process should be adopted without delay, so that it can be used to find the best
person to take over in January 2017.
Q. Write short notes on the following:
a. WHO
The Constitution of the World Health Organization (WHO) came into force on 7 April 1948. Since then, WHO is the
directing and coordinating authority for health within the United Nations system. It is responsible for providing
leadership on global health matters, shaping the health research agenda, setting norms and standards, articulating
evidence- based policy options, providing technical support to countries and monitoring and assessing health
trends. In the 21st century, health is being considered a shared responsibility that involves equitable access to
essential care and collective defence against transnational threats.
With the boundaries of public health action becoming blurred, WHO is increasingly operating in a complex and
rapidly changing landscape that extends into other sectors that influence health opportunities and outcomes.
WHO responds to these challenges using a six-point agenda that addresses two health objectives, two strategic
needs, and two operational approaches. The six points in the agenda are promoting development; fostering health
security; strengthening health systems; harnessing research, information and evidence; enhancing partnerships;
and improving performance.
WHO's agenda of health development is directed by the ethical principle of equity: Access to life-saving or health-
promoting interventions should not be denied for unfair reasons, including those with economic or social roots.
WHO activities aimed at health development give priority to health outcomes in poor, disadvantaged or vulnerable
groups.
Its health and development agenda includes attainment of the health-related Millennium Development Goals,
preventing and treating chronic diseases and addressing the neglected tropical diseases. It has fostered health
security by strengthening the world's ability to defend itself collectively against outbreaks by enforcing the revised
International Health Regulations since June 2007.
Strengthening of health systems is a high priority for WHO and it ensures that health systems reach poor and
underserved populations of the world. It addresses areas such as the provision of adequate numbers of
appropriately trained staff, sufficient financing, suitable systems for collecting vital statistics, and access to
appropriate technology including essential drugs. It generates authoritative health information, in consultation
with leading experts, to set norms and standards, articulate evidence-based policy options and monitor the
evolving global heath situation.
WHO carries out its work with the support and collaboration of many partners, including UN agencies and other
international organizations, donors, civil society and the private sector. By using the strategic power of evidence,
Page 34 of 44
WHO encourages partners implementing programmes within countries to align their activities with best technical
guidelines and practices, as well as with the priorities established by countries.
As a means of improving its performance, WHO participates in ongoing reforms aimed at improving its efficiency
and effectiveness, both at the international level and within countries.
Entitled "Engaging for Health", the 11th General Programme of Work provides the framework for organization-
wide programme of work, budget, resources and results for the 10-year period from 2006 to 2015. The General
Programme of Work sets out core functions of WHO as: providing leadership on matters critical to health and
engaging in partnerships where joint action is needed; shaping the research agenda and stimulating the
generation, translation and dissemination of valuable knowledge; setting norms and standards and promoting and
monitoring their implementation; articulating ethical and evidence-based policy options; providing technical
support, catalyzing change, and building sustainable institutional capacity; and monitoring the health situation and
assessing health trends.
WHO's objective, as set out in its Constitution, is the attainment by all peoples of the highest possible level of
health. The Constitution defines health as a state of complete physical, mental and social well- being and not
merely the absence of disease or infirmity. The World Health Assembly the supreme decision-making body for
WHO meets each year in May in Geneva, and is attended by delegations from all 193 Member States. While the
headquarters of WHO are in Geneva, Switzerland, it has six regional offices and 147 country offices in which more
than 8000 people from more than 150 countries work.
In addition to medical doctors, public health specialists, scientists and epidemiologists, WHO staff include people
trained to manage administrative, financial, and information systems, as well as experts in the fields of health
statistics, economics and emergency relief.
To mark the founding of the World Health Organization, a "World Health Day" has been celebrated on the 7th of
April annually since 1950. Each year a theme is selected for World Health Day that highlights a priority area of
concern for WHO. The celebration is a worldwide opportunity to focus on key public health issues that affect the
international community. On this day, WHO launches longer-term advocacy programmes that continue well
beyond 7 April.
The themes adopted by WHO since 2001 were: mental health, move for health, shape the future of life, road
safety, make every mother and child count, working together for health, international health security, protecting
health from climate change, and make hospitals safe in emergencies.
World Health Day 2010 focuses on urbanization and health. The theme was selected in recognition of the effect
urbanization has on our collective health globally and for us all individually. Some facts on urbanization, released
by WHO are: over 3 billion people live in cities; In 2007, the world's population living in cities surpassed 50 per cent
for the first time in history; and by 2030, six out of every 10 people will be city dwellers, rising to seven out of
every 10 people by 2050.
With the campaign "1000 cities 1000 lives", WHO has given a call for a global movement to make cities healthier.
Events are being organized worldwide calling on cities to open up streets for health activities. Stories of urban
health champions are being gathered to illustrate what people are doing to improve health in their cities.
The global goal of the campaign is to open up public spaces to health, whether it be activities in parks, town hall
meetings, clean-up campaigns, or closing off portions of streets to motorized vehicles in 1000 cities. Another goal
Page 35 of 44
is to collect 1000 stories of urban health champions who have taken action and had a significant impact on health
in their cities.
b. UNESCO
UNESCO, acronym for United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, specialized agency of
the United Nations (UN) that was outlined in a constitution signed November 16, 1945. The constitution, which
entered into force in 1946, called for the promotion of international collaboration in education, science,
and culture. The agency’s permanent headquarters are in Paris, France.
UNESCO’s initial emphasis was on rebuilding schools, libraries, and museums that had been destroyed in Europe
during World War II. Since then its activities have been mainly facilitative, aimed at assisting, supporting, and
complementing the national efforts of member states to eliminate illiteracy and to extend free education. UNESCO
also seeks to encourage the free exchange of ideas and knowledge by organizing conferences and providing
clearinghouse and exchange services.
As many less-developed countries joined the UN beginning in the 1950s, UNESCO began to devote more resources
to their problems, which included poverty, high rates of illiteracy, and underdevelopment. During the 1980s
UNESCO was criticized by the United States and other countries for its alleged anti-Western approach to cultural
issues and for the sustained expansion of its budget. These issues prompted the United States to withdraw from
the organization in 1984, and the United Kingdom and Singapore withdrew a year later. After the election victory
of the Labour Party in 1997, the United Kingdom rejoined UNESCO, and the United States and Singapore followed
suit in 2003 and 2007, respectively. In 2011 UNESCO approved full membership for Palestine. Following the vote,
the United States announced that it would no longer pay dues to the organization, because of congressional
legislation that prohibited the financing of any UN agency that admitted Palestine as a full member. Because of its
unpaid dues, the United States lost its voting rights in UNESCO in 2013. In 2017 U.S. officials, citing “anti-Israel
bias” and the size of U.S. arrears to the organization, announced that the United States would leave UNESCO again
at year’s end. Israel itself remained a member.
Besides its support of educational and science programs, UNESCO is also involved in efforts to protect the
natural environment and humanity’s common cultural heritage. For example, in the 1960s UNESCO helped sponsor
efforts to save ancient Egyptian monuments from the waters of the Aswan High Dam, and in 1972 it sponsored
an international agreement to establish a World Heritage List of cultural sites and natural areas that would enjoy
government protection. In the 1980s a controversial study by UNESCO’s International Commission for the Study of
Communication Problems, headed by the Irish statesman and Nobel Peace laureate Seán MacBride, proposed a
New World Information and Communication Order that would treat communication and freedom of
information as basic human rights and seek to eliminate the gap in communications capabilities between
developing and developed countries.
Each member state has one vote in UNESCO’s General Conference, which meets every two years to set the
agency’s budget, its program of activities, and the scale of contributions made by member states to the agency.
The 58-member Executive Board, which is elected by the General Conference, generally meets twice each year to
give advice and direction to the agency’s work. The Secretariat is the agency’s backbone and is headed by a
director general appointed by the General Conference for a six-year term. About 200 national commissions,
composed of local experts, serve as governmental advisory bodies in their respective states. Most work occurs in
special commissions and committees convened with expert participation. Prominent examples include the
Page 36 of 44
Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (1961– ), the World Commission on Culture and Development
(1992–99), and the World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology (1998– ). The findings
of these commissions are regularly published by UNESCO.
c. UNICEF
UNICEF began its mission in 1946 as a relief organization for children after World War II. Its mandate soon expanded
to helping children whose lives were at risk in developing countries. Almost 60 years later, UNICEF is more than 7,000
people in 157 countries and territories around the world. Nine of 10 staff members work closely with national and
local governments and other partners around the world.
Throughout, UNICEF’s priorities have been realizing the intrinsic rights of children to a basic quality of life, rights
world leaders further defined in the Convention on the Rights of the Child. UNICEF bases its actions on up-to-date
substantial research and experience on what works to help give children the best start in life, to survive and thrive --
especially in emergencies -- and to go to school.
This work correlates closely with the Millennium Development Goals set by United Nations States in 2000 – and is
central to meeting them. Of the 48 indicators of progress toward the Goals, UNICEF is chiefly responsible for progress
in 13.
UNICEF’s Priorities are Essential for Development
UNICEF’s work can be grouped into five main strategic areas. They are all interrelated; progress in any one leads to
progress in the others.
Together, they make a difference for children by supporting implementation of the Millennium Summit Declaration
and the world’s work toward the Goals.
They also ensure that UNICEF contributes effectively to reducing poverty, through advocacy and partnerships that
create sustained investments in children’s survival, development and protection.
These strategic areas are:
Young Child Survival and Development: In support of Millennium Goal 4 – reducing child mortality – and Goal 6,
malaria control, among others, UNICEF works toward comprehensive child health care in the earliest years, including
the antenatal period before birth.
Toward helping young children survive and have a healthy, productive future, UNICEF advocates for and gives
financial and technical support to national- and community-based education and intervention programmes on health
care and nutrition. Priority areas include immunization, preventing and controlling malaria, controlling and treating
diarrhoeal and respiratory diseases, eradicating guinea worm and preventing anaemia.
Health programmes ideally include antenatal care of pregnant women, and neonatal care in the first four weeks after
birth, including promoting breastfeeding. UNICEF also shares advocacy, social mobilization, and research work in a
supporting role to help other agencies provide emergency obstetrics.
Building upon a decades-long commitment on health, UNICEF provides vaccines to 40 per cent of children in
developing countries, and provides technical support on the complicated process of delivering them. Millions are
Page 37 of 44
protected from diseases like measles, polio, diphtheria and tuberculosis with vaccines that cost an average of only 50
cents per child. Vaccination programs ideally include supplements of vitamin A and micronutrients that further
boost immunity and help prevent malnutrition-related disorders.
UNICEF is also often first on the ground in declared emergencies to deliver these and other life-saving interventions,
like fresh water and basic medical supplies.
Along with the World Health Organization (WHO), UNICEF supports local programmes that improve access to basic
water and sanitation, which are in turn vital for health, development and education initiatives.
Basic Education and Gender Equality: In support of MDG 2 and 3, UNICEF collaborates with countries, donor
governments and other UN agencies to promote, fund and facilitate universal primary education and gender
equality.
This includes improving children’s developmental readiness for school, especially for excluded children and among
disadvantaged groups, via community-sponsored childhood education and health initiatives.
In all stages of this process, through advocacy and local programmes, UNICEF works to reduce the gender gap and
other disparities in access to, participation in and completion of basic schooling. This includes` supporting water,
sanitation and hygiene improvement in schools to create a child-friendly environment for learning.
Using practical demonstrations and evidence-based advocacy, UNICEF seeks to help national and local governments
and groups improve educational quality and retention.
Finally, UNICEF also delivers school supplies and tents in emergencies as part of its Back-to-School programme,
helping children return to a more normal, safe environment and protecting their right to basic education.
HIV/AIDS and Children: This disease crisis brings poverty and social devastation along with death. To combat it –
which helps reach MDG 6 -- UNICEF works with nations, non-profit organizations and religious groups, youth
organizations and many other partners to organize gender-sensitive prevention education, skills and service
campaigns aimed particularly at adolescents.
UNICEF also works via advocacy and community outreach to help governments, communities and families support
children orphaned by HIV/AIDS.
UNICEF also supports programmes that help prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV/AIDS and that increase the
number and proportion of women and children receiving antiretroviral drugs.
Child Protection: In support of Millennium Summit Declaration Section 6 – Protecting the Vulnerable UNICEF
advances protective environments to help prevent and respond to violence, exploitation, abuse and discrimination,
and for children made vulnerable by emergencies.
Focus areas include raising government awareness of child protection rights and situation analysis, as well as
promoting laws that punish child exploiters. Working through advocacy and its local offices worldwide, UNICEF helps
strengthen the resources of schools, communities and families to care for marginalized children, including those
orphaned by HIV/AIDS.
Policy Analysis, Advocacy and Partnerships for Children’s Rights: This UNICEF focus area centres on Goal 8 –
establish global development partnerships -- and also on strengthening national and local policies that fulfil
Page 38 of 44
children’s rights to survive and flourish.
Reducing child poverty is a critical part of fulfilling these rights. To that end, and to accomplish MDG 1, UNICEF
promotes sustained national and global investments that leverage resources and results for children’s well being,
including in emergency situations. Working with a wide range of partnerships including governments, regional
bodies, and private and civil society groups, UNICEF provides input and participates in developing sector-wide
approaches (SWAPs), Poverty Reduction Strategy Plans (PRSPs)and budgets.
Supporting its stand on critical issues, UNICEF also takes the lead in knowledge management: researching needs,
monitoring results and keeping open records of lessons learned. Among others, UNICEF has helped to develop the
following two data tools, acknowledged by governments and development agencies worldwide as leading indicators,
and is itself the lead agency for monitoring global and country data on the six Goals related to children.
UNICEF devised The Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS) method in the mid-1990s. An inexpensive and effective
tool, MICS is a major source of data for monitoring the fulfilment of human rights and progress toward the Goals.
UNICEF promotes its use, trains and assists governments in implementing the method, and presents collected data.
UNICEF has also invested significantly in the development of DevInfo, software for effectively storing and presenting
data in tables, graphs and maps.
Further, UNICEF promotes the active participation of children and young people in decision-making on matters
concerning their own well-being. This includes activities from advocating for children’s rights to freedom of thought
and expression, to creating a Web site for them to share ideas.
Progress and Challenges: The world is behind schedule for meeting almost all of the Goals. And the consequences
will be suffered most by children. Millions will die or sicken from preventable diseases. Millions will see their futures
dim because their governments have not provided them with basic education. Experts agree, however, that meeting
the Millennium Goals is achievable by 2015. Reaching them will require a stronger commitment and focus from all
countries on realizing the rights of children, and therefore toward achieving global development and peace.
d. FAO
The Food and Agriculture Organization came into being in October 1945, with a view to collecting, analysing,
interpreting and disseminating information relating to nutrition, food and agriculture.
The founder nations of FAO expressed the wish to raise levels of nutrition and standards of living, to improve
production and distribution of agricultural products to secure improvements in the efficiency of the production
and distribution of all food and agricultural products, to better the condition of rural population and to contribute
towards an expanding world economy.
In 1965, it was decided to add to the FAO’s mission, at the instance of the then Director- General, Dr. B.R. Sen of
India, the goal of ensuring humanity’s freedom from hunger.
To help members reach these goals, FAO provides an intelligence service, including not only facts and figures
relating to nutrition, agriculture, forestry and fisheries, but also appraisals and forecasts of production, distribution
and consumption in these fields; promotes national and international action to improve production, marketing,
processing and distribution of the products of agriculture (including fisheries and forestry), conservation of natural
Page 39 of 44
resources, and credit and commodity arrangement policies; and furnishes, on request, technical assistance in any
of the above fields.
FAO works through a Conference, a Council and a staff. The Conference is the policy-making body, in which each
member-State has one vote. Associate members have the right to attend and to take part in the discussions, but
without the right to vote.
The Conference normally meets biennially. Between sessions of the Conference, the Council supervises the work of
the FAO, reviews the world food and agricultural situation and makes recommendations to member-governments,
and to international bodies, on measures to improve the situation. The Council consists of thirty-one member-
governments elected by the Conference.
e. IBRD
During 1940s, the biggest problem before the world economy was the reconstruction of the economies, the war
had devastated.
It was realised that not merely achieving a sound financial system with balance of payments aid would be
necessary for accelerated growth but arranging long term finance was also required.
Long term finance would not only help countries to globally compete but ultimately also result in liberalisation of
trade.
The current emphasis of IBRD is to support the less developed countries as most of the developed countries’
economies recovered quickly. The IBRD, known as the World Bank, came into force on July 1, 1944, during the
Bretton Woods Conference. It is a sister institution to the IMF, but has s separate, distinct objective. Its head office
is located in Washington D.C., USA.
Presently there are 185 members of the Bank. Membership is allowed only to those countries who are also
members of the IMF. A member country’s voting power is dependent on the capital contribution. Like the IMF, the
World Bank is also being dominated by the major Western countries.
Objectives: The main objectives of IBRD are to assist the less developed countries in their development process
through the provision of:
i. Loans (particularly the guaranteeing of loans) for development projects, like infrastructure and/or industry.
ii. Technical assistance, being not available with the less developed countries, is being provided by the Bank. The
Bank finances the cost of outside and domestic experts for preparation of feasibility and impact analysis of the
projects.
Organisational Structure: Like IMF, at the top is the Board of Governors. Each member nation appoints a Governor
and an Alternate Governor. The Chairperson of the Board of Governors is the President of the World Bank. The
Board of Governors is the main organ of the Bank to take policy decisions on the Bank’s activities, admission or
suspension of any member, changes in the authorised capital stock, distribution of income, and endorsement of
financial statements and budgets. The Board meets once a year.
Page 40 of 44
Since the Board of Governors meets once a year, the bulk of the powers of the Board are delegated to the Board of
Executive directors, who are responsible for operationalising the policy measures. The Executive Board comprises
of five executive directors appointed by largest shareholders and 19 executive directors are elected by rest of the
members. This Board meets twice a week to oversee loan applications and guarantees, new policies, the
administrative budget, country assistance strategies, and borrowing and financial decisions.
The President of the Bank, elected by the executive directors, is responsible for the management of the operations
of the Bank. It employs 8,000 staff at the head quarters and 2000 in the field.
f. ILO
The International Labour Organization was established in 1919 as an autonomous institution associated with the
League of Nations.
Its original constitution formed part of the Treaty of Versailles. In 1946, ILO became the first specialised agency
associated with the United Nations.
The ILO was founded to advance the cause of social justice and, in so doing, to contribute to the establishment of
universal and lasting peace.
The Declaration of Philadelphia, adopted by the International Labour Conference in 1944 and later annexed to the
ILO Constitution, reaffirms the principles to which the organization is dedicated.
It states that “all human beings, irrespective of race, creed or sex, have the right to pursue both their material well-
being and their spiritual development in conditions of freedom and dignity, of economic security and equal
opportunity.”
The ILO’s motto is: “Poverty anywhere constitutes a danger to prosperity everywhere.” Its aim, therefore, is to
improve labour conditions in regard to wages, hours of work and conditions of work.
Organization: It consists of three main organs.
1. The International Labour Conference: It consists of the representatives of all the member states of U.N.O. Every
member state sends four delegates to attend the conference.
Two delegates represent the government and the other two represent the employers and the workers. The
Conference discusses various labour problems of the world and takes certain decisions. These decisions are known
as conventions- The government of the member states may or may not ratify such conventions.
The Conference meets at least once a year. The Conference frames the policy of the Organization in the form of
conventions.
The Governing Body: It consists of 32 members, representing the government and 8 each representing the
employers and the workers. The governing body carries out the policy framed by the conference.
The International Labour Office: It is the secretariat of the I.L.O. Its head quarters are at Geneva. The Office
collects and supplies information regarding labour conditions all over the world. It prepares agenda for every
Conference and publishes regular bulletins and periodicals regarding the condition of workers all over the world.
Page 41 of 44
Functions: The I.L.O. seeks to promote social justice by improving the conditions of the workers all over the world.
It further affirms that labour is not a commodity; freedom of expression and of association are essential to human
progress; poverty anywhere constitutes a danger to prosperity everywhere; and that war against want should be
carried on everywhere.
For the achievement of these purposes I.L.O. is concerned with (1) regulation of hours of work, (2) the prevention
of unemployment, (3) provision of adequate living wages, (4) protection of workers against sickness, diseases,
injury arising out of their employment, (5) the protection of children and women, (6) provision for old age and
injury, (7) organization of technical and vocational education, (8) provision for child welfare and maternity
protection, (9) housing and other facilities for workers.
g. UNCTAD
The developing countries were greatly dissatisfied with the working of the GATT. The principles and procedures
underlying it were regarded as the fundamental cause of the weak bargaining position (in tariff reduction
negotiations) of the less developed countries.
Thus, though, GATT had made a very significant contribution to the liberalization of international trade in the
postwar era, it was condemned since most of its benefits accrued to the advanced nations. Hence, it was desired
to have some new institutional arrangements of international economic co-operation to deal with problems of
world trade and development, especially, those which may reduce the 'trade gap' of developing countries.
Consequently, the UNCTAD was created.
The first United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) met in March 1964 in Geneva. It was an
ad hoc gathering of representatives of about 120 states which were members of the United Nations.
It, however, marked a turning point in international economic relations and ushered a new era in the evolution of
world trade and development, since it represented the first major endeavour to examine all the problems of
international economic relations, with special reference to the needs of developing countries.
Organisation of the UNCTAD
The UNCTAD is established as a permanent organ of General Assembly of the United Nations. However, it has its
own subsidiary bodies and also a fulltime secretariat to service it.
It has a permanent organ called Trade and Development Board as the main executive body. The Board
functions between the plenary sessions of the Conference. It meets twice annually. It is composed of 55 members,
elected by the Conference from among its members on the basis of equitable geographical distribution.
The Trade and Development Board has four subsidiary organs to assist it in its functions. These are: (1) The
Committee on Commodities; (2) The Committee on Manufactures; (3) The Committee on Shipping; and (4) The
Committee on Invisible Items and Financing related to Trade.
Generally, these committees meet annually. However, they may be called in special session to consider urgent
matters.
Main Functions of UNCTAD
Page 42 of 44
The main intention of the Conference was to assist the developing countries achieve accelerated economic
development by helping them to control economic forces instead of being dominated by them.
The principal functions of the Conference are:
1. To promote international trade all over the world - between developed and developing countries with different
socio-economic systems, and thus, to accelerate economic development.
2. To formulate principles and policies on international trade and related problems of economic development.
3. To make proposals for putting the said principles and policies into effect.
4. Generally, to review and facilitate the co-ordination of activities of the other institutions within the U.N. system
in the field of international trade.
5. To be available as a centre for harmonious trade and related documents in development policies of
governments.
h. IMF
The IMF was established on December 27, 1945 in Washington on the recommendations of Bretton Woods
Conference. But it started working on March 1, 1947. The fund has 189 member countries accounting for more
than 80 per cent of total world production and 90 per cent of world trade.
The purpose of the Fund is to promote international monetary cooperation, to facilitate the expansion and
balanced growth of international trade, to promote exchange stability and to prevent unnecessary exchange
depreciations, to remove all exchange controls and restrictions and to establish multi-convertibility of all
currencies and lastly to help member countries with funds to correct maladjustments in their balance of payments.
The fund of the IMF is SDRs 216.75 billion and to replenish its resources it borrows from the world financial
markets and member countries. IMF’s own fund is contributed by member countries.
Each member country has a quota based on its economic and financial strength its national income, share in world
trade and monetary gold held by it. The quota also determines the voting power of a member country and its
borrowing power.
India is a founder member of the fund. India’s original subscription quota was SDR (Special Drawing Rights) 400
million. The initial par value of rupee was Rs 3.30 per US dollar but, subsequently, the rupee was devalued a
number of times till it stood at Rs 8.25 in 1978. At present, the external value of the rupee is not fixed but allowed
to fluctuate according to market condition of demand and supply.
India has been able to borrow from the fund to overcome her balance of payments difficulties. India borrowed $
100 million from the fund during 1948-49 but paid back the amount by 1956- 57.
Since then India has been borrowing from IMF at regular intervals in order to overcome its balance of payments
difficulties. In 1981, India borrowed a massive amount of SDR 5,000 million (or Rs 5,000 crore) to overcome its
external balance of payments arising basically from oil imports. India had to borrow again from IMF because of
serious adverse balance of payments during 1990-91. After 1994-95 India’s loan from IMF has been declining.
Page 43 of 44
i. IMFC
The IMF Board of Governors is advised by two ministerial committees, the International Monetary and Financial
Committee (IMFC) and the Development Committee.
• The IMFC advises and reports to the IMF Board of Governors on the supervision and management of the
international monetary and financial system, including on responses to unfolding events that may disrupt the
system.
• The size and the composition of the IMFC mirrors that of the Executive Board.
• The IMFC has 24 members who are central bank governors, ministers, or others of comparable rank and who
are usually drawn from the governors of the Fund’s 189 member countries.
• Each member country that appoints an Executive Director and each group of member countries that elects an
Executive Director appoints a member of the IMFC.
• The group is currently chaired by Agustín Carstens, Governor of Banco de México, who was selected to head
the Committee in March 2015.
• A number of international institutions, including the World Bank, participate as observers in the IMFC’s
meeting.
The IMFC meets twice a year, during the Spring and Annual Meetings. The Committee discusses matters of
common concern affecting the global economy and also advises the IMF on the direction its work. At the end of
the Meetings, the Committee issues a joint communiqué summarizing its views. These communiqués provide
guidance for the IMF's work program during the six months leading up to the next Spring or Annual Meetings.
There is no formal voting at the IMFC, which operates by consensus.
Page 44 of 44

Political Science Vi - 6th Semester

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Political Science Vi - 6th Semester

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Political Science Vi - 6th Semester

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

• All the members of UN are members of General Assembly

• Assembly meets once a year.

• Special sessions may be held during emergencies.

Forum for multilateral negotiation

Functions and powers of the General Assembly

While the Assembly is empowered to make only non-binding recommendations to States on

The search for consensus

Is the General Assembly in need of reform?

Need of Change in Security Council's composition

• To formulate plans for establishing a system to regulate armaments.

A. Specific settlement of disputes by peaceful means.

B. Taking enforcement action.

• To call upon the parties to a dispute to settle it by peaceful means.

• To recommend to the General Assembly to suspended membership against whom preventive or

Voting procedure of Security Council:

THE SECRETARY GENERAL AS A LEGAL ACTOR

It consists of fifty four members all elected by the General Assembly.

The Council (Article 45 of the Charter) is responsible for promoting:

• UN Member States administering trust territories

• Permanent Members of the Security Council not administering trust territories

3. The territories voluntarily placed under the trusteeship system.

The aims of the trusteeship system are fourfold:

(i) To further international peace and security;

• by entering into a special agreement to submit the dispute to the Court;

THE REQUIREMENTS OF IMPARTIALITY AND INDEPENDENCE

History and Importance of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights

SUCCESS OF UNO IN PROTECTING HUMAN RIGHTS

United Nations Disarmament Commission

PROPOSALS TO THE UNITED NATIONS FOR CHARTER REVISION

2. Each member of the Security Council shall have one representative.

V. In conformity with Article 23 (as revised), Paragraph 2 of Article 27 shall read:

VII. In the interest of justice, it is proposed that Article 50 be amended to read:

a. the interpretation of a treaty;

b. any questions of international law;

Q. Write short notes on the following:

UNICEF’s Priorities are Essential for Development

These strategic areas are:

Organization: It consists of three main organs.

Organisation of the UNCTAD

Main Functions of UNCTAD

The principal functions of the Conference are:

You might also like