Shipping Container Analysis

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 08 Issue: 05 | May 2021 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072

Feasibility of using Recycled Shipping Container Material in Building


Construction, Design and Analysis using STAAD-Pro
Raksha Khandare1, Nilesh Chotaliya2, Devang Gediya3, Jaimin Gohel4, Dipesh Hingu5
1Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, A.P. Shah Institute of Technology, Thane,
Maharashtra, India.
2-5Under Graduate Student, Department of Civil Engineering, A.P. Shah Institute of Technology, Thane,

Maharashtra, India.
---------------------------------------------------------------------***----------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract - Recently, a new concept has been developed 200000 individual pieces of SCs and take about a week to
over the world followed by many attempts in order to load and unload.
achieve sustainable and eco-friendly buildings. It depends on
using shipping containers (SCs) blocks as structural Countries’ trade globally uses shipping containers for a
worldwide transportation network which produces lots of
components with a lot of advantages, such as energy
empty containers at the destination ports. While returning
efficiency, flexibility, sustainability and economy. Although
them to the home country may not be economical, leaving
architecture in India is subjected to continuous change and them in their new home could take lot of space. So, there are
proposing solutions for many unresolved problems such as tons of empty containers out there waiting to be reused or
population inflation, low land area and slums, shipping recycled. Due to recent development of technological
containers have not been commonly used in India. As innovation, reuse of shipping containers for home building
containers blocks are widely available in the India coastal usage might deserve further investigation between its other
zone; it has been selected to be our case study. usages.

In this paper, an outline of the usage of SCs as flexible Promising cases of transforming containers to youth center,
components for residential buildings has been presented. classroom, emergency shelter, office, house and hotel are
Besides, some residential design solutions have been emerging around the world each year. This would be a kind
suggested for the coastal zone in India. Then, a comparative of offset in a way, which could result in greener and healthier
assessment for their predicted environmental performance coastlines without creating another issue in landfill.
has been done. Finally, the most suitable design form with However, the matter is how to transform those containers
the highest energy performance based on SCs in the coastal sustainably for homebuilding purposes in a way that makes
zone in India has been concluded. our society greener and healthier.

1.INTRODUCTION Throughout history, Concepts of shipping container


architecture which uses wasted shipping container blocks as
Shipping containers are used for cargo, goods transportation building components.
and for next transportation either buy new container or
reuse old container (better to get new), so generally new 1.2 Advantages of shipping container home
containers are used. Old one becomes waste (no reuse),so
we can use it as building material.  Cheap: - Shipping container houses are significantly
very resource efficient and can be made to look like
Shipping containers can withstand shipment,storage. They regular house.
are steel or corrugated boxes. Container homes are building  Strong: - Shipping containers/cargos are much
erected with these containers.
stronger than traditional wood light frame
construction, this is simply because shipping
Usual length are 6 or 12 meters, 2.6 meters high and 2.6
meters wide and also varies sizes are available. containers are made from steel.
 Green: - As opposed to traditional brick and cement,
Shipping containers can carry the maximum gross weight of shipping containers allay cost and availability
30480 kg /67200 lbs for general purpose containers and up concerns and boast an eco-friendly edge.
to 45,000 kg (99,207 lbs) for flatracks.  Independent: - We know that different material is
used to construct traditional houses but in the case
1.1 History of shipping container houses, container is used to
construct comfortable houses.
In 1956, Malcom Mclean presented the first container to  Durable: - life span of shipping container is 10 – 12
international trade knowing as the cargo shipping container. years. A used container can easily surpass another
The achieved success allowed him to enter marine 10+ years of use.
transportation business. Ships in average can carry about

© 2021, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.529 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 3489
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 08 Issue: 05 | May 2021 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072

 Fast construction: - Total construction process form Table-1: Loading scenario on shipping container.
starts to end about 30% faster than a conventional
build.

2. PROBLEM STATEMENT

This is new innovation in building construction. In India,


shipping container is used mostly for storage purpose and in
construction industry it is used for temporary office. The
literature shows that returning of empty containers is costly.
So using them in construction as a building material could be Table-2: Size, capacity and payload of various
a better option. So, we proposed to construct home from
shipping containers in coastal area of India.
shipping container.

3. REPORT ON PRESENT INVESTIGATION

3.1.1 Data collection: - From various literature review,


data required for design of home from shipping
container i.e. weight of container, size of shipping
container, materials used for shipping container,
properties of material used for shipping container,
common load point, young’s modulus, shear
modulus, thermal coefficient, density etc. is
collected which is mentioned below.
Table-3: Properties of corten steel.
3.1.2 Payload: - The payload or net weight is the weight
of the cargo or contents that a container can hold. Sr. no. Properties of corten steel value
1. Young’s modulus 190 * 106 KN/m2
2. Poisson’s ratio 0.29
3.1.3 Container gross weight: - The container gross 3. density 77.50 KN/m3
weight is the weight of the container plus the 4. Thermal coefficient 12 * 10-6 /°C
maximum payload it can hold. 5. Critical damping 0.03
6. Shear modulus 73 * 106 KN/m2
7. Yield stress 275 * 103 KN/m2
8. Tensile strength 430 * 103 KN/m2
9. Yield strength ratio 1.5
10. Tensile strength ratio 1.2

3.2 AutoCAD Plan of Shipping container

The following figure shows plan of shipping container


home as well as schedule of door and window which we
have proposed for our project. we have used 40 fts two
container and 20 fts two shipping container.

Fig-1: Schematic diagram of a 20 ft standard shipping


container.

© 2021, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.529 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 3490
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 08 Issue: 05 | May 2021 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072

Fig-2 : AutoCAD Plan of Shipping container.

Fig-4 : Property.
In corner post, ISMC 300H (face to face) and other than
corner post, ISMC 250H (face to face) is provided which
3.3 Design of shipping container home in STAAD PRO: make the structure safe to transmit the load.
3.3.1 Geometry: -We have done geometry of shipping Material of corten steel is to be made from property of
container home according to requirement of loading and corten steel table. The following figure shows making of
according to manufacturing of shipping container. corten steel material.

Fig-5 : Making of material of corten steel.


3.3.3 Supporting &loading: -
The following figure shows types of dead load, live
load and combination of loads which applied on
shipping container.
Fig-3 : Geometry of shipping container.
3.3.2 Property:
The following figure shows property of corner post,
beam and cross member of shipping container.

Fig-6 : Loading.

© 2021, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.529 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 3491
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 08 Issue: 05 | May 2021 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072

3.3.4 Analysis 3.3.6 Design of welding: -

Analysis is to be done in STAAD Pro to check that Fig-10 : Weld joint


geometry, property, support and loading is done
properly. If error is zero, then structure is proper.
The following fig Show the different views of STAAD
Pro after application of load.
Fig-7 : Plan Viev Fig-6 : Left side View

Table-3: Design of weld.

t 14mm
Apȳp 228.629*106mm3
Izz 323.655*109 mm4
V 242.89 KN

Fig-8 : Right Side View Fig-9 : Front View Ʈv = 6.128 N/mm2


Strength of weld 198.46N/mm2

We show here one sample of weld similarly done for


the all wall location. Thus, we have done design of
weld which is done to place partition wall in shipping
container.

4 Methods for Thermal Comfort Assessment


It can be found that the envelope design is one of
the most effective strategies to increase interior
3.3.5 Design: - insulation. Specifically, Vacuum Insulation Panels
(VIP) have been used providing higher thermal
Designing is done to check element i.e. beam, corner
resistance and inner space saving with respect to
post, cross member is safe in carrying load. We have
conventional insulation materials.
designed beam, column of shipping container by
taking command and define parameter.
Moreover, the additional use of wood strip and
Again analysis is done, This analysis is done to check wooden frame can take full advantage of the limited
applied property is capable of carrying applied load space on the container wall bases, adequate
or not. protection of vacuum insulation panels, and work as
The following figure shows no member is fail in the fixed framework for interior wall panels’
carrying load.Thus, we have designed the shipping installation. Fig is shown for roof n side wall.
container home in STAAD Pro and found that is safe
to use for human beings. In order to meet the generic container building
design through the three different location seach
external part of the envelope with the minimum U-
values has been proposed and estimated according
to ISO 10456, ISO 6946.

© 2021, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.529 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 3492
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 08 Issue: 05 | May 2021 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072

Fig-11 : Partition Wall.


REFERENCES

[1] Dave Ryan,2017, Feasibility Study Affordable Housing


Development Using Growth Point Shipping Containers.
[2] Xiaoxiong Zha and yang zuo,2017, Finite element study
of container structure under normal and high
temperature.
[3] Mohammad Ataei, 2016, Exploring the Potential of
Climate-Adaptive Container Building Design under
Future Climates Scenarios in Three Different Climate
Zones.
[4] Edric king hui wong, cher siang tan, philip chie hui lin
,2015, Feasibility of using ISO shipping container to
build low cost house in Malaysia.
[5] L.F.A.Bernardo,2013,Use of refurbished shipping
Fig-12 : Roof. containers for construction of housing buildings: details
for structural project.

5. RESULT : -
From this design of shipping container, we can conclude
that it is safe for use as all members are safe i.e. no
member is failed in design.

6. CONCLUSIONS: -

• The proposed conceptual design responds to new


challenges with the feature of a future built
environment.(low energy use, low carbon footprint and
construction practices under different climatic
scenarios.)
• That can be easily constructed and relevantly in a
low budget within a short time, in addition to the
flexibility and possibility of been reconstructed in other
locations or sites.
• This study shows that the calculation of structural
projects with this construction system by using the
resources currently available for the structural engineer
(structural codes).

© 2021, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.529 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 3493

You might also like